Do you really need that Fujifilm 40 megapixel sensor?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 лис 2022
- In today's exciting video, we check out the Fujifilm 40-megapixel sensor vs. all the other Fujifilm sensors. 16, 24, and 26!
Fun.
Holiday time photo deals: bhpho.to/2JudrbQ
You didn't win anything, and I will never ask you to contact me in the comments. It's a scam. And stop messaging me about it. I know. Thanks!
Subscribe, please.
First time here? Hi, I'm Omar Gonzalez, a professional portrait and event photographer in the NYC/NJ area. On this channel, we talk about cameras, lenses, and techniques to improve our photography.
My business:
www.omargonzalezphotography.com
Gear I use for business: • The Event Photography ...
Social Follow/Contact me
Instagram: ogonzilla
ogonzilla
***********************************************************************
upgrade if you want:
bhpho.to/3DRiGfs - Розваги
This is such a good reminder how amazing even a 16mp image can be in the right situation
That's why I'm keeping my Fuji x-m1. It still does the job.
Some of us were still shooting weddings with Nikon D3s at 12.1 MP and getting paid for it. Megapixels mean absolutely nothing!
@@Caballeroshot og Canon 5D 12 mp as well and does the job to this day besides of course the high iso which a good flash can handle. And yep that Nikon D3s also has wonderful colors. The Fuji X100 12mp was another gem.
I keep shooting with my D4 and my D700 ( 16 and 12 mp ) ... None has ever complained about anything. This mega pixel race is just a way to sell new stuff pretending it will be " the best " ...
@@danieldiggs9574 Yep, original 5D is still my main camera, looking at getting something newsoonish but will still keep it as it's a tank and has done me well. From fashion and portraits back in the day to landscapes in Iceland, its never failed me.
I agree with all of that Omar .
I shoot 16mm and trust me, I have no regrets for my street ; historic gardens and homes and travel to need more megapixels . In fact , it wasn’t all that long ago when I gave up using my 6 megapixel camera to my nephew as he wanted to learn photography .
As somebody once said : the gear doesn’t matter . Just train your eye to see and go out there to capture a story in one or a sequence of images .
Omar, this was another great lesson you have put out there to educate those who might need it.
If you want to spend money then get a lens , produce a book or save up for a trip that will give you loads of fabulous pictures . Regarding the latter point , those places are way closer to home than you might think .
Finally - always carry a camera and we all do that these days : it’s our phone .
Big thanks once again for another first class video .
For me it will be the newer sensor, the improved autofocus, the IBIS and the larger battery. It made no sense to upgrade my X-T3 to the X-T4 but the X-T5 is too appealing :)
I’m exactly the same. I love my X-T3 but can’t wait for the X-T5 preorders to ship
I have xt3. I so want the xt5. Going to keep my xt3 though when the job doesn't require a larger file
I had the XT-1, upgraded to the XT-2 when it came out and have stuck with it - I didn’t need the video-centric improvements of the 3 and 4. I'll switch now for the sensor in the 5
You can add another to the list of X-T3 users upgrading. The IBIS, sensor, autofocus advancements, size. Can’t wait!
Same!
I’m not upgrading from my XT3 for the 40mp sensor. I want the in-body stabilization, the supposed improvements in auto focus, and better battery life. With my old eyes, I’m not even sure I could see the difference between 26 and 40. 😊
I’m in the same spot but not sure if that warrants an early purchase when my X-T3 works just fine. The things you and I both want will improve the quality of life though so I’m pretty stuck on the decision right now.
@@jamestonbellajo Same! I might travel to Italy next year, and it seems way more compelling to invest in a Tamron 17-70 (or Fuji 16-55 perhaps) and the Fuji 55-200 over the camera upgrade. 🤔
Same for me tim stahmer ! And I keep my cameras for a long time before I get a new one.. it will be 5 years. And in a few years time, 40 mp will be quite ordinary. Computers are getting faster, lightroom will be more efficient etc..
I think I’m in the same boat. I had the x-t5 in my cart and was about to make the purchase complete, but I think I’ll hold off for now and stay with my x-t3 for now.
I hoped they had stayed with 26mp, 40mp might be a little rough on my old decrepit PC
You have quickly become my favorite you tuber when it comes to things photography never negative always positive and great attitude.
I love that you make these videos to help combat our gear addiction!
Actual reasons 40mp helps. Cropability. I'm sorry, even as a professional, sometimes I need to crop into my photos for the composition I was trying for. With 40mp, you have an unbelievable amount of room to crop in as you proved with the 16 vs 40. So, I can crop into 25% of the image and still have a wonderful photo to deliver. That means, I can digitally zoom 2x and reach farther. Shooting the rings being exchanged for example, I can get tighter without blocking everyone's view. 40mp is extremely useful. Not to mention the AF improvement.
If you're almost always cropping less than a certain percentage, though, it might not be worth it.
I think I made this point. I'll have to rewatch.
Did you and me watch the same video? He mentioned that.
@@ogonzilla you definitely did mention this point! I was more responding to the general comments about not needing the resolution. I think it's still a worthwhile upgrade, as I just upgraded from XT2's.
This ^^. I have the Leica M11 (61mp sensor) and this has totally 'opened up' much longer focal lengths, especially on the street. I can crop to a 1/3rd of the image and still have >20mp end result. We don't *need* high megapixel sensors, but boy oh boy do they help ++.
That was simple and eye-opening, thanks for bringing us back to earth Omar!
Thank you for putting out a comparison! I noticed the difference the most in the detail of the camera body. I was semi-questioning my decision to preorder the X-T5 (as one does with big purchases, or at least me anyway), and this actually solidified for me that the upgrade is warranted! My wildlife photography benefits greatly from cropping and I hate losing too many small details. I also have a few of the lenses that can take full advantage of the higher resolution, so I won't have to buy any lenses for the full advantage here. I'm not sure if you mentioned in this video what lens you were using, but hopefully it was one of the ones Fuji has said can utilize the full 40mp.
Very helpful indeed! Thank you very much for your insights and for covering some of my, and many others, questions on the matter.
I am very disappointed that Fuji aren’t supplying a battery grip - for me it’s quite a necessity when using the heavier zooms.
For now I’m still very happy with my X-T3, though admittedly IBIS would be handy in low light!
Thank you again for all of your wonderful work and thoughtful videos - they are of huge help and greatly appreciated.
X-T6 will have battery grip.
I started shooting runway models and the ability to crop is a game changer for me. I don’t always get a great spot at these events, but being able to crop in (even with the 50-140’s reach) can make a stunning close up portrait out of a full body shot. I also love the ability to use the sports finder mode and still get a nice 24mp image! I shoot with both the X-H2 and the X-T5. I gotta have my dials!
Great video , Omar. Thanks for cutting through all the hype about newer not necessarily being better.
Great insight and honest video, Omar! Thanks for making this. 👊🏽
I agree that 40 Mpix is not all it takes to make photography fun. Often it could be the other way around. Some of my favorite Fuji cameras are 16 Mpis X-Trans II cameras. I review older Fuji cameras and I've been amazed at how all of them hold their ground. One of the biggest surprises for me has been Fuji X-A1. Such a small package and so much might! Thank you! I'm always looking forward to your new videos.
I think the question should be which one (sensor) has the better dynamic range.
Well done, nice to see the side by side comparisons 😊
Have been using my XH2 now for about a week. I do like it, coming from DSLR Canon. Definite a learning curve as I was very comfortable with my old DSLR, but the fuji works well. Everything you would expect from a high end camera. Yes there is a slight difference in perceptible resolution but comes with negatives as well. Not enjoying the file sizes, going to be problematic for sure.
I totally agree. Sure, a higher megapixel count could be useful if you need to cropping in... like a lot! Otherwise, there is not really a practical necessity for tons of megapixels. Actually, one of my favorite cameras is the Nikon D700. Only 12 mp but the colors coming out from that sensor are just beautiful. As always, a very entertaining and informative content from you! Keep it up!
Sold My D700 a couple years ago because I got accustomed to the lighter weight and much smaller Fuji cameras. But that D700 had the best colors. It was my workhorse for weddings.
Try telling that to gear-driven nerds with deep pockets! But genuine toggers will agree with you.
Thanks for the video. Upgrading from x-t2 primarily for better cropping birds, as you mentioned, and also to have IBIS. But plan to keep my x-t2 for landscape photos when I ride by motorcycle.
Good video as always. I'd like to add disadvantages of the 40 MP compared to the 24 MP: you'll need more storage space, more money for SD cards, you'll have to wait longer for your computer to process the files when editing them, and you need very good and expensive lenses to actually use the high resolution sensor.
I think all the 'fujicron' lenses are optimized? The f2 primes, which are the cheapest lenses Fuji sells.
You don't need "very good and expensive lenses" to use the new sensor. You need Fujifilm's more recent lenses to _optimize_ the resolving power of the new sensor. Older lenses will continue to produce images that look just as good as they do via the 26MP sensor.
Dude, I have an old laptop with an i3 processor and 16 GB memory ram i use a Nikon d850 and all this works fine . About storage yes and no. Even then I use d200 I don't have enough space on my hard drive. So, time to time I use to select the most important picture to store and delete others.
I've been using the A7r3 for a few years now and although I might take allot of shots in macro photography to get the perfect one. I still cull allot so not so bad on the HD space to be honest. As for processing time I do find that my X-T2 raws take longer to render in Capture one than the larger sony 42mp raws but I think that's down to fuji's sensor array. So, yes 40mp fuji raws are going to take longer to render I think... Nothing my M1 Mac Pro can't handle though :-) I'm a bit miffed that my XF16 1.4 lens didn't make the recomended list...
40MP provide a choice for original size or drop to lower MP. 24MP cannot provide a higher upscale photo by physically.
Nice comparison, I am stil happy with my X-T3.
Thanks for sharing.
Brilliant video Omar. Best channel on UA-cam.
I'm soooo tempted to buy the X-T5. However, this video has just clarified what I already knew. My X-T3 is just fine for my landscape photography. I'll wait a year or two and pick one up used.
I was hoping Fuji launches 12MP(for good low light performance), 26 MP (sweet spot) alongside 40MP X-T5
I'm with you. My X-T3 will continue to be just fine for landscape and travel pics. Come Xmas 2023 and beyond, that will be the time to move up to the X-T5.
For upgrading my X-T3, I'm waiting for the XH-3, so I can use my old one as a b-cam and travel light cam. If the X-H3 is a stacked 40MP, that would give me enough reason to upgrade, as I shoot some birds as well as landscapes.
@@amitkrupal1234 This will never happen and here's why.
MP is largely irrelevant when it comes to noise/low light performance. Sensor size determines that. Downsize the 40MP image to 12MP and you will have the same result as a 12MP sensor.
Use AI based noise reduction algorithms and the 40MP sensor will come out ahead of the the 12MP sensor.
Thanks !!! Great video. As an owner of X100T, X-T20 and X-T2, I've started to wonder if I'm getting too far behind the times. So this has relieved my anxiety. I mostly shoot people (documentary, street and portraits), so I think I'm good untill one of my X-T bodies break. Keep up the great content.
After I bought a X100T my X-T3 is collecting dust. There is a magic in this sensor that can't be found in later sensors.
Thanks Omar,another thoughtful video. I shoot with and love an XT3. I probably will upgrade to the XT5 for the better autofocus,IBIS and occasional wild life and landscape. If I had a choice between a 40 mp and 26 mp XT5 I would go for the 40mp just a bit more vesitile. Most importantly now I don't need the GFX100S I've been lusting after(or do I?).
I immediately fell in love. D-pad and joystick in this small housing with image stabilisation and then in this phenomenal design. can’t wait to get my x-t5. 🤞
Great video, and a great reality check for those of us with FOMO! Thanks
For me the important advantage is cropping. Right now, when shooting birds they're often a bit far away for the 150-600mm still. Cropping to just the "good bits" of an image doesn't leave many pixels, so I cannot make the image very large. Not printable anymore. But getting closer was not an option either, and putting on a teleconverter would have just resulted in loss of light, and poorer AF.
And for macro, well macro is "all about the details", isn't it? 😉 I hope that I can extract more details out of a 40mp sensor vs a 24mp sensor. And again, can make tight crops and still get nice details for an image which is printable at reasonable size.
So I expect an X-T5 will give me better AF than the X-H1/X-T3, and also allow me to crop a bit more.
For landscape shots or portraits it won't really matter indeed.
If there would have been 2 X-T5s, one with the 40mp sensor and one with the stacked 26mp sensor, then... I might have preferred the faster stacked sensor for better bird / wildlife AF, maybe not. The choice would have been a lot harder for me!
For me personally the X-H2(s) has too many compromises to enjoy shooting with it, so the choice between the X-H2 and X-H2s has for me already been answered with "no".
So yeah, I've like more megapixels. For certain uses.
Another improvement of the 40mp sensor btw, is the lower base-ISO which, according to the numbers, should give a somewhat increased dynamic range. This could be a benefit for landscape photography, and perhaps also for other types of photography where high contrast can be expected.
Excellent juxtapositions and MPX analysis. Thank you.
I think for me, doing bird photography the xt5 will be good upgrade from my XT2 due to eye auto focus improvements. Good points and illustration, thanks Omar
I've been a graphic designer for 20 years, and a photographer for 10, and I've never needed any more than 24mp. Even for billboards. But I needed a second body and bought an X-H2 for better AF, IBIS, and battery. And coming from the X-T3, it's nice to have a camera with a chunky grip. The 40mp is just an added bonus.
Super video. I didn't need to hear all the specs all over again. You presented a lot of great information for someone to make a decision that is best for them. I appreciate the intelligent approach. I have an X-T3 and decided to skip the X-T4, thinking that the X-T5 (two years later) would be a better upgrade. Your parting comments about the true benefits ring true for me. The X-T3 doesn't have IBIS and I didn't feel I needed that. But given that the X-T5 essentially has a second-generation and I have read that it's gotten smaller (ish), I think IBIS is probably worth having. I will take the plunge no doubt but my eyes are wide open now about the benefits (or not) of 40 megapixels vs. 26.
The most helpful review of the megapixel "upgrade" or "wars" I have seen.
X-T2 24mp sensor is great! thanks for the great video :)
I have an X-Pro2 and loving it. But the IBIS, tilt screen and more megapixels on the X-T5, is really compelling to me. I've been doing a lot of macro stuff with the 65mm Laowa 2:1 lens and I'm so curious to see how that would look with 40 MP. Already looks crazy at 24!
Nice bro. Thanks for sharing. My xt20 can still last for another few years.
I have loved my X-T20 since the day I bought it (I blame you for that, Omar) and I have absolutely no reason to even think about "upgrading".
Excellent Omar...I think you upgrade for better AF, better feature, but not for just pixel.
Ohhhh. All looks great, better battery sensor ibis processor to xt3 or lower, BUT!!! the limitations of lenses which support the new sensor is knife in the heart. 35 f1.4 auuuutch. Would be great topic to try those lenses on those new bodies with higher pixels. Thanks for your videos. Always thumbs up.
I will be upgrading to the XT5 from the XT3, but for features, like IBIS rather than the MPs. Having said that, I frequently crop in very tight on an image and having those extra pixels makes a difference.
Throw my XT-2 away? NEVER! I would like having the IBIS and larger battery.....Thank you, Omar for talking me into waiting.
Spot on video, totally agree!
Thank you. You answered my question. I will continue to shoot with and enjoy my XT-30 that serves me veery well.
Thanks I was wanting an xe2 this helped me so I will get it
Still with an old faithful Nikon dslr. However, The XT5 ticks all the boxes. Thanks Omar!
the difference will probably be more noticeable when youre using studio lighting on the subject or doing macro product work. Pixel Shift Multi-Shot feature on the xt5 is a nice upgrade aswell.
Thank you, very helpful!
The major reason for 40 MP is the ability to crop an image and maintain the image quality after a crop. Rarely can I use an image that doesn't require some cropping, so with an increase in MP you can assurance that the quality will remain high.
I rarely crop and focus tightly to fit subject to fill the frame . I did this when I took up photography when I was way younger than I am now .
Sure , there are occasions when a crop makes sense , but I try to avoid doing so; but recognise its value and the impact it can have in telling the story .
In short : there is no right way , but I avoid the crop to ensure maximising the picture sharpness , but will sacrifice that to produce a powerful image that is arresting when telling a story .
@@carmenfissenden2530 Not always easy during live events such as concerts, or bird photography, not everything is static or almost static as in landscapes which I also love to shoot as well
@@carmenfissenden2530 HC Bresson never cropped he just took the picture at the right distance...all said most people will never take a notable picture, or when they do, they will not notice it so it doesn't really matter if its 6 million pixels of a poor picture or 60 million pixels
Thanks Omar appreciate the real world sense check I hav=vent upgraded my XT-3 because the XT-4 wasn’t enough of am improvement but was thinking of XT-5 but maybe not just yet. I agree re the older sensors still being great I have an X100V but still love shooting my X100T it has so much character especially for B&W
Two reasons for me to "upgrade" from X-S10. 1) Cropping. I don't have to buy (and carry) some incredibly high-priced lense (sic) to photograph boats on the lake. 2) Autofocus. Today, I shot a lot of faces, and a lot of scenes with no faces. According to the X-S10, some of the faces weren't faces, and some of the non-faces were. I understand that the X-T5 fixes this.
Great common sense look at megapixels. Thank you
Love both of those sideshow statues. I used to have the hulk in green
Yeap... great to have options and fun plus the newer tech. "Upgrading" from the XT2.
Your videos are so helpful. Im thinkin about the coming XS20, assuming it will be 26mp. Depending on price difference i may choose xt5.
Hi Omar, nice video. I do have X Pro2/XH1 and Im very happy with those two cameras but since XH2 is out now with 40 mpx. there is one area where I would see my self like to have those 40 mpx and those are post production flexibility of skin tones in Photoshop thats probably it. Most of the time its about what we want and not what we need good photographer will do magic with 24mpx camera. I do remember my wedding was shot with 12mpx camera and pictures come out very nice.
I will buy X-T5 and shoot jpg in M size which is around 20MP, I don't need 40MP but I like its retro design, improved autofocus
Interesting. What about the resolving power of the lens used? Much ado is being made about the new 56mm f1.2 WR, I have the original 56mm F1.2 non WR. If you tested it with the new glass which fuji seems to be championing what would a side by side look like then. Every time fuji launches a new camera Im wondering should I upgrade? My last upgrade was from Xpro1 to a Xpro2 and XT2. They do the job and do it well, 40 MP is tempting but….does it make fiscal sense. I’ll probably still be debating this question when the XT 9 comes out 😮
This might be a huge upgrade for me, i will be going from rebel t5i to either a used X-T3 or X-T5. With mixed use cases and lots of street ops.
I am in love with Fuji look and I don't think any camera comes close. My only consideration is used A7RIII for 1,600 usd
Third day with the X-H2 from xt4 and finding I'm really happy with it!....first day was not is much, lol.
About the megapixels you right but I’m al lot on the street and if something happen my XT3 starting up so slow. And also the focus is not so good. But I’m still in love with it. But I want a quick start up and good focus.
I actually need it. I used the Canon R5 (45 MP) for half a year and for what I do, commercial product/food and portraits, switching back to Fujifilm means I need to get the XH2. I also do high-end retouching.
I’m pretty much prepared for the big files post process and storage wise.
Seriously, one will just have to check his budget and what he usually shoots to make the purchase decision.
Nice comparison video. What lens did you use on the X-H2?
Oh, I am definitely looking to upgrade.... to the XT4. Hopefully the X-T5 generation of releases is adequately exciting for enough people that it will lead to a jump in people selling their X-T4 cameras at a nicely 'discounted' rate. The only appeal to me even for the X-T4 is essentially the IBIS. Otherwise I can stay with my X-T3 as long as it continues working nicely. It's a fantastic camera, with so many lovely features :)
Nice review. Here is my perspective. I really enjoy bird photography and in my case, my Canon R5 allowed much deeper cropping than the Canon R6 so I upgraded. In all other cases, it simply did not matter. For me, the absolutely most critical capability for a modern camera is the accuracy, speed and stickiness of eye auto focus when tracking a person or animal. It the focus is soft, then the photo opportunity is generally lost. Most other issues can be fixed in post processing.
I'm about halfway through the video as I write this question: Does the greater resolution give better dynamic range or other editing benefits. The 40 megapixel would produce better options for cropping, but I'm thinking about the average photo.
Your right your right your really really right. One of my cameras the Sony DSC R1 (10mp) prints 20" x something on the wall look "Spectacular"
It would be great to see a comparison X-H2 vs Z7II too. Thanks Omar J
Question: is it possible to shoot with the X-T5 at 24/26 or similar mpx? Is there a setting to use the camera with that resolution?
I have the X-T3, the higher MP is not my main reason for considering an upgrade, it's the IBIS. As I'm getting older, I'm unfortunately developing a slight tremor in my hands, although the OIS has helped, when I'm using manual lenes I notice it more. It's not all the time mind you, mostly when it's cold or when I'm getting tired. Of course, the improved AF and overall faster processor is a big boon too. My friend has the X-H2 with IBIS, but I was never a fan of its aesthetics.
I bought the X-T3 and then found the X-S10 on sale which has become my favourite camera. For me, I find it a shame Fuji changed the all-rounder formula of the X-T4 to a very heavily photo centric formula on the X-T5 and also removed the flippy screen. I'm sticking with my X-S10 until there is a mark 2 maybe :)
My wish list for the X-S10 II is the new sensor/autofocus, 10 bit and no more 30 min record limit! - the X-H2 looks great, but it's far too big for my daily carry.
is it really that photo centric? it can do video pretty well
Excellent comparisons. I really want a body with IBIS otherwise my XT2 is just great.
One comparison I'd like to see (sensor size aside) is something like the gfx 50r vs the x-t5 when it comes to dynamic range and low light performance. Can the new technology overcome old performance issues
funny as always and good points. People always feel like they need the latest tech or bigger megapixel etc when they don't even need it. Though, the new camera tech itself offers better usage and experience.
Great video. Now throw crop sensor vs full frame into the mix. Is it the same story?
I still have the X-E2 and although it produces great images, I feel like it's a bit behind already. Mainly focusing. I'm looking to upgrade but not to the newest models. What would be a good upgrade to an X-E2? Looking to buy used due to budget constraints.
7 минут и всё по существу. Без воды на 17-20 минут, СПАСИБО!
Nice comparison. Maybe you should indulge us with some different sensor size comparison detail-wise. Cheers
I notice that my XF 18-55 f2.8-4 isn’t on Fuji’s optimised lens list for this new sensor. I know a lot of people think this is a great kit zoom but Fiji is saying it’s not quite up to making the most of this sensor. But I see the XF 27 mm is and that’s a common kit prime
Thank you, Omar! What lens did you use on those comparison shots?
So... I had convinced myself that since I want to do portraits, the X-T5/X-H2 and it's 14mp bump over my X-T3 would help with that. I watched a ton of videos on it and this one broke me. I am surprised by how little difference it makes to image clarity and detail. Which are exactly the things I wanted it for. If you did complex landscapes or city-scapes which had lots of distant details. You will notice the difference, (Gordon Laing has a good example of this). But for what I do/want to do, I'm now not sure that it really matters.
Yes ! I want to see your results in low light 🙂
printers do 300 dpi for a reason. we can see that amount of detail. A 24 Mpex camera 6000x4000 pixels can be printed at 20x13 inches maximum. But there is a medium format, leica look that has to do with tonal graduation that is retained even when you downsample the image for a screen. I believe that is a reason to go for 40 mpex, the pictures may look more alive than others even when you don't need more detail you may need better tonal resolution.
Yes. 🙂
It's the fine detail in leaves on trees 1/4 mile away where you will see the improvements. Landscapes are the most demanding subjects for resolution. A 2mp camera will take a great shot of Spiderman in your bedroom... 🤩
Do you know if the q button can be reassigned for back button focusing?
Thank you for this comparison. I guess I am a pixel peeper. I often wonder how a 40mpx crop sensor would compare to 24mpx full frame of a similar generation. Bigger pixels vs more pixels.
How about low light situations? How will it compare with the XT2? Is it better handling noise? The same? I do landscape with my XT2 and ocasionally astrolandscape.
Great videos Omar, thanks!!
XT-5 is not just a new sensor. It has a very improved autofocus system, which is a main concern for me (as per previous models).
I feel like I need therapy after getting an X-T4 earlier this year! Love it - but jealous of that X-T4 spec. But mainly because I heard the X-T4 is lighter and with faster focus.
Muy Bueno video, Si, todo depende del uso que le vas a dar a la foto. Yo ahora ago wild live and Birds y como tu bien dices los megapixels cuentan, Thank you for your magnifique Video.
New film simulations! It’s all about Nostalgic Negative. And trying to keep up with Moe’s birding photography. Lol
Very true, pixel peeping always looks better, but it can't make a 'uninteresting' image 'interesting'. I figured that the extra crop factor would be the main reason for an X-T5. With the 16-80mm, at the long end it is 80 * 1.5 = 120 mm (35mm equiv). If you crop down the X-T5 to 10 MPIX that gives you an extra crop factor of 2X, so that 80mm can be used as a 120 * 2 = 240mm (35mm equiv). I thought that would be useful.
Not really 🤣🤣 But adding the IBIS and 6K video is really tempting.
The fact that you can further crop the photos is also great. Sometimes the lens just needed that extra reach, especially primes.
Obviously it’s not the same, but imagine you have the XF35mm F2 prime. Effectively you can use it like a 50-80mm equivalent zoom! That’s so cool.
And the 18-55 can be used like a 28-100 equivalent zoom and still get great photos!
Have wondered about the real advantage to this for (me) the amateur. Wonder if it has, at times a disadvantages effect on the pro if the client is looking for the newest (not necessarily best) gear. For me, I've found my level and niche in using the XPRO-3 - right eye shooter loving the optical feel that takes me back to the early 60's onward when I started at 14 - except without the hassle & expense of film - you now - carrying three cameras with varying ASA loaded so you could meet whatever can up! 26 mega luxury
Omar rocks!
Many thanks for your sanity. I've always resisted additional megapixels. Some of my best photos were taken with only 6 and they still look great on my computer screen. I might still buy the X-T5 though, because I would like IBIS, the last remaining film sims (not on my x-T30), smarter AF, and the other good things you touched on. My biggest question is around the subjective one of out-of-camera colour rendition (my t shirts proudly proclaim the motto 'I SHOOT JPEG'). I sitll think the older cameras have the most 'artistic' look. How do you think the 40 megapixel sensor compares?
Very nice comparison. A Fujifilm X-T2 shooter.
Not for everyday weddings (that my main job) but for the cropability factor for wedding portraits tes.
To Omar’s point, enhancing with either Lightroom Super Resolution or the Topaz Gigapixel AI, will double your image size without issue or artifacts. It’s really amazing. You can do that without the new camera. If you need the other wiz bang features, ok. But don’t do it for the resolution alone.
Thank you for bringing rationality to the discussion. 🙃
I am perfectly happy with my XT4. Of course, my spouse upgraded an XH1 to the XH2 with File Transfer grip. 😉
Oh, I'm getting the XT5 lol. ;)
@@ogonzilla 🙃 Hmmm...XT6 ...would be like xt5 but with flip+tilt screen, headphone jack, file transfer grip... 😃
I'm watching on a 80 inch TV in my living room perhaps 4 meter away I cant tell any difference.
Only time I want more resolution is when I work on images in photoshop on my 4k display its just slightly easier to work on an images with higher resolution.
An option is ofc to change the display resolution to something lower.