Turing Machine - How To Play

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 лип 2024
  • In this video, we're going to learn how to play Turing Machine! If you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to post them in the UA-cam comments below, ensuring you abide by our Code of Conduct: watchitplayed.tv/code-of-conduct.
    Become a member of the Watch It Played Patreon Team! watchitplayed.tv/patreon/v=Ao...
    Find more Turing Machine problems or download new sheets at: www.turingmachine.info/
    The correct example for Card 25 in the first printing of the game should read: "The Verifier verifies that there are either increasing or decreasing values in a 2-digit consecutive sequence (e.g.: 312 or 254), a 3-digit consecutive sequence (e.g.: 345 or 321), or none at all. (e.g.: 135 or 531 - in this example the 1-3 sequence is increasing, but 1 and 3 are not consecutive numbers). The Verifier does not know if the sequence is increasing or decreasing."
    Support us by picking up some promos here: watchitplayed.tv/promo-store/...
    Our TeeSpring Store (get your shirts, mugs and other items!): watchitplayed.tv/teespring/v=...
    This game's BoardGameGeek Page: boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/3...
    Check out my personal vlog here: ‪@RodneyJSmith‬
    Get A Watch It Played Microbadge: watchitplayed.tv/bgg-microbad...
    Email: watchitplayed(at)live(dot)com
    Twitter: @watchitplayed
    Twitch: / watchitplayed
    Facebook: / watchitplayed
    Instagram: @watchitplayed
    We truly appreciate your views, feedback and subscriptions.
    00:00 - Introduction
    00:35 - The Setup
    04:12 - Game Play Overview
    04:41 - Step 1: Composing Your Proposal
    06:20 - Step 2: Questioning
    06:44 - A Questioning Example
    10:31 - Marking Your Question On The Sheet
    11:03 - Testing Limitations
    11:35 - Using Your Sheet To Organize Other Deductions
    12:38 - Another Questioning Example
    13:24 - And Another Questioning Example
    15:01 - Asking An Invalid Question
    15:35 - Criteria Card Reference
    16:38 - Step 3: Deduction
    16:59 - Step 4: End Of Round
    17:38 - The Verification And End Of Game Step
    18:11 - Continuing Or Ending The Game
    19:11 - Starting A New Game
    19:23 - Solo and Co-Op Modes
    19:47 - Conclusion
    #watchitplayed #boardgames #tutorial
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 170

  • @byjennortega
    @byjennortega Рік тому +20

    Thank you for making learning a new board game easy!

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      I hope you have a great time playing Jennifer - thank you for the kind support!

  • @Saturn2888
    @Saturn2888 Рік тому +217

    How in the world did they figure out how to make this mechanism work? That deserves its own video.

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому +33

      It’s really something, isn’t it?

    • @y0tub
      @y0tub Рік тому +3

      Totaly

    • @alldoitthesame
      @alldoitthesame Рік тому +9

      You can do it this way: each validator sheet has 125 different boxes (5 ^ 3 because there are 3 sets of 5 numbers). The validator then has to answer yes or no for each of these boxes. In turn, each of the numbered card combinations reveals a differently positioned box

    • @DavidGlaude
      @DavidGlaude Рік тому +5

      @@alldoitthesame
      Every combo of 2 cards of 2 different colors reveal 5 spots.
      Every combo of 3 cards of the 3 different colors reveal 1 single spot.
      So yes, there are 5*5*5=125 possibilities on each answer card.
      ... but on the answer card you can spot 133 locations with X or V, so why 133 and not 155 ...
      I believe not all spot are used, and maybe some combinaison of holes were not acceptable as it would make the digit card too weak so some spreading is needed.
      Also some randomization to avoid having pattern visible.
      Once the holes locations are defined, and the question to answer are specified in a formal way, it is easy to create the truth table to generated the answer card.

    • @Dr_C_Smith
      @Dr_C_Smith Рік тому +21

      The theory is one thing… the execution is still another.

  • @Dr_C_Smith
    @Dr_C_Smith Рік тому +64

    I’m very impressed with this. It has taken some fairly complicated mathematics and logic and combined it with an antiquated technology to make an intriguing game. I’m a mathematics professor and I’m genuinely interested in sharing this with not only my colleagues, but my classes!

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому +2

      It's really an impressive design, isn't it?

    • @mongoose6685
      @mongoose6685 Рік тому

      Original punch card programming was done on 80 character cards, so this is a simplified system obviously to fit the game.

    • @Dr_C_Smith
      @Dr_C_Smith Рік тому +1

      @@mongoose6685 No offense, but your comment added absolutely nothing.

  • @HachetteBoardgamesUSA
    @HachetteBoardgamesUSA Рік тому +6

    Excellent teach, as always!

  • @jonkirk2118
    @jonkirk2118 Рік тому +5

    Wow, what a lovely game and what a fab tutorial. Rodney, you've done it again. Many thanks.

  • @adventure_hannah3841
    @adventure_hannah3841 Рік тому +15

    This looks amazing! I love that it has solo, comp, and co-op mode! My game group loves Decorum, Forbidden Desert, and Paleo, so this looks like a game we'd also love!

  • @AnthonyFrancisJones
    @AnthonyFrancisJones 3 місяці тому +1

    Truly fantastic explanation which makes the 'rule' book much clearer. Isn't it funny that with many games the hardest part it getting to understand how to play it and with this game it can be a bit frustrating without a bit of help! You have answered all of my questions with a great video! Just what UA-cam should be and be for! Many thanks.

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  3 місяці тому +1

      Very glad to know this was helpful!

  • @javier505mx
    @javier505mx Рік тому +19

    This game looks like it was created by a software developer, I love it!

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому +1

      It seems like it would need that kind of mindset!

  • @DMZub13
    @DMZub13 Рік тому +15

    Thank you very much for actually walking us through the initial setup. I just got this game today and have been looking at playthrough videos all afternoon. This is the first video to explain everything clearly and show a new player how to select the cards and get ready to play. Your videos are always so clear and helpful, you have become my go-to whenever I'm learning a new board game.

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому +1

      So glad to know this was helpful!

    • @manncz
      @manncz 3 місяці тому +1

      Precisely, the only video I could actually understand the hameplay from. Thank you for making it!

  • @Mockingjay1986
    @Mockingjay1986 Рік тому +3

    Just picked this up in my local game shop and am just delighted by it! Great concept, so well executed. Once the methodology clicks it’s very satisfying. Definitely recommend! Thanks Rodney.

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      Hey, glad you enjoyed - thanks for checking out the video!

  • @adib.7545
    @adib.7545 Рік тому +2

    First time I've seen this type of game and it looks great! Your explanation is also spot on, thank you.

  • @SirNichosis
    @SirNichosis Рік тому +10

    What a fascinating, well engineered game! 😮 definitely want to try this

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому +1

      Hard to wrap my head around what went into designing something like this - pretty cool, right?

  • @Vikingblood801
    @Vikingblood801 11 місяців тому +1

    Excellent teaching - as always. 👍🏻 Much appreciated.

  • @sterling1489
    @sterling1489 Рік тому +2

    Just picked this up at Origins Game Fair, and I was already excited to try it, and this has just solidified my desire to try it with my group. Thanks for always making understanding so many different games and mechanics so easy to understand, Rodney. You’re a treasure to the gaming community.

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому +1

      Thanks for the kind words, Sterling! We hope that you and your friends enjoy playing Turing Machine together. Cheers!
      -Chaz

  • @teejleague3838
    @teejleague3838 Рік тому +2

    Still waiting on this, but not giving up!!! It's great to know it was so well received!

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      Still not available yet? Here's hoping it comes in soon!

  • @henriwhitehead
    @henriwhitehead Рік тому +1

    Great Video, Rodney! This game is so clever!

  • @teejleague3838
    @teejleague3838 Рік тому +3

    This was a game on my radar for Ben. I think he would really enjoy this one! Thank you for the teach!

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      My pleasure! Hope you both enjoy if you get a chance to try it :)

    • @teejleague3838
      @teejleague3838 Рік тому

      I think it will be in stock again pretty soon. It has been very popular, which is always a good thing for a game company! :)

  • @TemujinReads
    @TemujinReads Рік тому +1

    I've played a few rounds of this game. I like it quite a lot!

  • @lasocietedesjeux
    @lasocietedesjeux Рік тому

    Really great explanation for a incredible great game! Thanks

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      Glad to hear you've been enjoying this game!

  • @fabiengridel
    @fabiengridel Рік тому +2

    Amazing explanation !

  • @blnichol7
    @blnichol7 11 місяців тому

    That was very clear. Thanks Rodney!

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  11 місяців тому

      You bet Ben - have fun playing!

  • @cubist12
    @cubist12 Рік тому +2

    Great video. We attempted to play the game the other day and got a little lost in terms of what we were actually trying to determine. Your examples cleared it up for me.

  • @kaseyschertenleib
    @kaseyschertenleib Рік тому

    Thank you for clearly explaining a game that was difficult to wrap my head around from reading the rule book.

  • @tinstargames
    @tinstargames Рік тому

    Excellent penmanship Rodney

  • @jessactor
    @jessactor Рік тому +2

    My wife and I still play Wordle every day and compete against each other, so I think this would be an AMAZING addition as something we could play after dinner and not take up too much time! I love that!

  • @PocketPet
    @PocketPet Рік тому

    Clear and easy -thank you!

  • @nightwishpower
    @nightwishpower Рік тому

    You are the best at explaining

  • @TheFlood2009
    @TheFlood2009 Рік тому

    Whoa. This game looks amazing. I am now searching the internet for a copy. Thanks again for another amazing video!

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      Glad you enjoyed what you saw Daniel!

    • @TheFlood2009
      @TheFlood2009 Рік тому

      Got the game today and played a game already. My daughter and I love it!! Thanks again.

  • @josyuen4207
    @josyuen4207 Рік тому +7

    Thanks so much for this. I hope you and your family are doing well and are safe after the storm. I was watching the news and am devastated with people losing their homes. 🙏 for a speedy recovery on the island.

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому +2

      Thanks Jos. We were fortunate to avoid damage directly to our home. No power will be available for days I expect, and lots of cleanup to do here for sure.

  • @Krispe
    @Krispe Рік тому

    Just ordered this after it’s been on my wishlist and out of stock since this video’s creation. I’m so excited I can’t even explain it

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      Finally in stock again? Great!

    • @Krispe
      @Krispe Рік тому

      @@WatchItPlayed Boardlandia is the best

  • @aba_dab_o
    @aba_dab_o Рік тому +2

    Thanks for the video! I'm not into many deduction games, but this one feels rather simple and without deception. (I'm hardly good at deceiving/lying.) Definitely one of the hit purchases at Gen Con. Got my preorder in at my FLGS. (Hearing around a Nov'22 release?)
    I hope you and the fam are doing well post-Fiona. Do take care, and we will see you soon!

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому +1

      Thanks Aba, we’re doing lots of cleanup here at the moment!

  • @Veggieman87
    @Veggieman87 Рік тому +3

    This is a really clever design for a puzzle! Hope I can find it at my FLGS!

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      It will be releasing this year, if all goes well!

  • @fabienleger5757
    @fabienleger5757 Рік тому +1

    andddddddddddd, that's the setup! Looks fun!

  • @felipealvarez1982
    @felipealvarez1982 Рік тому

    Thank you Rodney. Such a cool game and theme. I would love to see you do a video on Dominant Species Marine 🐟

  • @Oxirador
    @Oxirador Рік тому +4

    After watching this, i regret even more not having played this during this weekend Delirium Ludique, where it was available as a demo. :( Looks awesome.

  • @wyz1324
    @wyz1324 Рік тому +3

    I love to see new games from Le scorpion masqué 😁

  • @brickisland6353
    @brickisland6353 6 місяців тому

    Will try this tonight.

  • @Sem5626
    @Sem5626 Рік тому +3

    this one finally turned up after a long search… holy smokes what a great game, both in a group and solo
    such a simple yet complex game, I’m a software engineer and it definitely has a vibe that a software engineer or computer scientist came up with this one
    hats off Rodney, you’re a legend of the board gaming community, one watch of this and I am off to solve millions of codes 😊

  • @JohnSmith-ef2rn
    @JohnSmith-ef2rn Рік тому

    This looks like a lot of fun! If only I had someone also willing to play this....

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      Hopeful,y you’ll find someone! Thanks for checking out the video.

    • @raphaeld9270
      @raphaeld9270 Рік тому +2

      The game also offers a solo mode, which is one of the reason I might get it too.

  • @heavy_dice
    @heavy_dice Рік тому +1

    This game is amazing, what’s more amazing is the other games on Rodney’s shelves! Pax Pamir and COIN with mansions of madness and Catan. All the hallmarks of a guy who appreciates all games, love it!

  • @teejleague3838
    @teejleague3838 Рік тому +3

    This one has been tough to find for months except through pre-orders. Hopefully by spring it'll be out more readily. Ben is a computer programmer and he's very interested in it.

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      I think the first print run sold fast!

    • @AA-xy9lr
      @AA-xy9lr 10 місяців тому +1

      I just found it at Barnes and noble today 😊

  • @colococolo
    @colococolo Рік тому +1

    This game is gonna win some prizes.

  • @teejleague3838
    @teejleague3838 Рік тому

    One of these days, I'm gonna find this in stock somewhere and get it for Ben! As a computer programmer, he is super interested. I've heard it plays excellent solo.

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      Here’s hoping it’s back in stock soon!

  • @SraTacoMal
    @SraTacoMal 6 місяців тому

    Thanks so much for saying the sheets are available online, I want to play on BGA.

  • @MrRubixscube
    @MrRubixscube Рік тому

    that game looks purely amazing

  • @warrentutwiler8297
    @warrentutwiler8297 Рік тому

    Thanks for the video, very clear. It seems the game could be quite portable, particularly for solo, with a smaller box and using the app, too.

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      And the box is already not too big, so I think you're right.

  • @mighty9435
    @mighty9435 Рік тому +1

    Hi, just got this game and I love it already. Thank you for this video. I do have a question though. I wonder if there is something that I did not understand. What is the point for each verification card to have a green, a blue, a purple and an orange number if we always put them behind our number cards with the green number up… (matching the circle, triangle and square). They could have used the green number only?

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому +2

      I wondered the same thing - in short it's meant to make it harder to people to memorize combinations of cards (but I cannot fathom a world where that would ever really be an issue).

  • @mrten9664
    @mrten9664 Рік тому

    Well if your red green colorblind this game set up should be fun. Game look fun though. Love the channel most games I own I have but after watching your learn to play

  • @danewiskow3680
    @danewiskow3680 11 місяців тому

    Just finished watching the movie The Imitation Game and now I want this game!

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  11 місяців тому

      I hope you enjoy it, if you get a chance to play!

  • @yawn74
    @yawn74 Рік тому

    Just saw this ! Hope I can purchase it outside USA :D

  • @teejleague3838
    @teejleague3838 Рік тому

    Believe it or not, I am still trying to find this game for Benjy!

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому +1

      It should be back in stock soon (hopefully!)

  • @gyped
    @gyped Рік тому

    Cool game!

  • @albertolopes829
    @albertolopes829 Рік тому

    Just curious, how would you rank the four COINS on your shelf, based on your personal preference? I have played Cuba Libre and Gandhi and liked both, and I recently bought Pendragon but it is yet to be played (would love a how-to-play video for it!).

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому +2

      I actually have all of the COINS. But they may not all be in view. I haven’t played all of them (currently learning Falling Sky). I tend to avoid general rankings of games though. I can say Cuba Libre has been played the most.

  • @MandyFilet
    @MandyFilet Рік тому +2

    Loved the video! One question:
    - Will the secret number always return a green checkmark to all verifications used in the scenario? In other words, say the scenario contains criterium card 14 ("Which of the colors is the smallest?"), does that imply that one of the colors is in fact strictly smaller than the other two (thus eliminating numbers like 322 or 115 right off the bat, even before the first round)? Or would it still be possible for the secret number to be 322, in which case it would just always return an X for criterium card 14 (since it would be an invalid question)?

    • @jernmon
      @jernmon Рік тому

      15:01 - Asking An Invalid Question

    • @MandyFilet
      @MandyFilet Рік тому

      @@jernmon I saw this part too, but my question still stands. :) Would the inclusion of such a criterium card imply that there hás to be one single smallest number? Or would something like 322 still be a possible solution?

    • @jernmon
      @jernmon Рік тому +6

      @@MandyFilet I would think that the secret number determines what criterium cards can be used it. Card 14 loses meaning if the smallest digit is repeated, so the designer of the scenario shouldn't choose that card for those secret numbers. So, I would think that yes, the card itself can imply some information without ever being consumed. This is an intro scenario and I believe they are rated with a difficulty, so it makes sense that some cards could give information by merely being chosen

    • @JorWat25
      @JorWat25 Рік тому +1

      @@MandyFilet One of the three conditions is true in the final code, so yes, there will be a smallest digit, else none of the conditions will be true. And yes, the correct code will satisfy all the verifiers' conditions. It should be the only code that satisfies all conditions, in fact.

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому +3

      The inclusion of a verifier does imply that it’s condition does apply directly.

  • @frankdetank9126
    @frankdetank9126 Рік тому

    Rodney is a master class in awesome. 🥓🥓

  • @MsGinahidesout
    @MsGinahidesout Рік тому

    This is interesting. I've never seen anything like it.

  • @PaulYoung-hn5ir
    @PaulYoung-hn5ir 7 місяців тому

    I’m confused on how there are millions of solutions when there are only 444 3-digit numbers available using 1-5?
    That said, what an incredibly designed game. I enjoy logic puzzles so I’m looking forward to giving this a shot.

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  7 місяців тому

      I'll leave the statistics to the mathematicians, but either way, glad you enjoyed what you saw :)

  • @board_with_games
    @board_with_games Рік тому

    Hope you're doing well!

  • @MisterNorthernCanuck
    @MisterNorthernCanuck Рік тому +1

    This is an absolutely incredible solo game. Marvel of game desigh as well...... woah.

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      Yeah, I can’t imagine what went into this!

  • @gagnonjoel2
    @gagnonjoel2 Рік тому

    This game will became de definitive deduction game! :D

  • @blind_surgeon
    @blind_surgeon Рік тому +4

    So honest question, if you fail the box flip do you really keep doing the intro over and over until it's perfect?

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому +3

      Are you suggesting I ever fail the box flip?!?! *gasp*

  • @MoniYakova
    @MoniYakova Рік тому

    Impressive game

  • @laskarisb8528
    @laskarisb8528 Рік тому

    Two things you got to know about this game!
    There is always exactly one answer! If you can ask a question where one answer would give an exact result and the other answer would give many opportunities as the final result, it is always! the answer which gives an exact answer. You can always find an exact number, the game does not let you down, you never have to guess the answer. (This is not an information given by the game, it is the result of playing some rounds, so there is a very low chance that I am wrong)
    Also I figured after some rounds that there is always a possible answer which will give a checkmark. Means if the card offers to find out if one of the symbol is a 4, there is a minimum of one 4 in the answer. (This was always right, but again: There is still a chance this could be wrong).
    This is what I tried to ask earlier #WatchItPlay. I just couldn't ask understandable.

  • @maverickdelta
    @maverickdelta Рік тому +1

    What is the point of a verification card have 4 numbers? For example, the card displayed at 2:40 has numbers 201, 204/, 796 and 798#. Why would the side matter if we still need to align the circle, square and triangle with the punch cards?

    • @nyobari
      @nyobari Рік тому +1

      The reason there is four numbers is to help prevent memorization of which card has which marks. Verification cards will be reused by puzzles, so if you associate question card 4 with verifier card 457, then you'd already know which question is being asked.

  • @chayashida
    @chayashida Рік тому

    If I understand this right, for a given validator, it's possible that none of the options has a checkmark, right?
    Like in the "blue is smallest / yellow is smallest / purple is smallest" example, if the right number was 121, then all three options would have Xs, right?

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      I believe "technically" that's right (in other words that's how the machine SHOULD reply to a situation like that), however if I understand correctly, the machine will not create situations like that. IN other words if it has a "X is the smallest number" checker, then it means there will be one number that is smaller than all the rest.

  • @DrMcFly28
    @DrMcFly28 Рік тому

    This looks awesome. Will it be available in EU soon?

    • @JorWat25
      @JorWat25 Рік тому +1

      Last I heard, it'll be available at the end of October.

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому +1

      Let’s hope so!

  • @Z-Strike026
    @Z-Strike026 Рік тому +2

    At 4:56 you said to write a proposal of any number from 111 to 555. Wouldn't any number with a 6 or higher (like 116 or 117) be disqualified?

    • @codeaccuna
      @codeaccuna Рік тому +4

      My understanding is that you compose your number within the available punch cards (1-5) so a number with 6 or 7 would be invalid as there is no corresponding punch card and you would not be able to test

    • @LeScorpionmasque
      @LeScorpionmasque Рік тому +3

      @@codeaccuna Absolutely 🙂

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      Code has it right!

  • @Gruso57
    @Gruso57 Рік тому

    since you're making a vid on this does that mean this will be more widely available?

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      I believe it’s releasing soon, which will make it much more available :)

  • @laskarisb8528
    @laskarisb8528 Рік тому

    Thanks to you, I as a german can play my french version of "turing machine" now.
    One question:
    I assume your explanation means that all solutions must be numbers, which are clearly findable with the answers giving by the machine. If the solution was 111 this turn the answers would have been the same as for 222, therefore it couldn't be neither 111 or 222, right?

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      I'm sorry Laskaris, I'm really not sure what you're asking. Sometimes logic questions can be hard to communicate over text.

    • @laskarisb8528
      @laskarisb8528 Рік тому

      @@WatchItPlayed Imagine the right number in your example was 1111. And than imagine it was 2222. The answers would have been the same.
      The game says that you lose, if you pick the wrong number. If the game gives you the same answers for different numbers, that you cannot tell them apart, it does not seem fair to lose like that. Therefore they likely only pick numbers, with no answer-twin like 1111 to 2222. Which gives you a whole lot of information.

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому

      @@laskarisb8528 Could you please time stamp me to the example you are referring to? I shot this long enough ago I don't know exactly which part you are referring to, and I want to be sure we're both talking about the same thing.

  • @toontalk4258
    @toontalk4258 6 місяців тому

    One slight comment - at around 5:00 it's not the numbers from 111 to 555... it's limited to containing only the first 5 numbers as digits. So 116, for example, isn't in there.

  • @groza528
    @groza528 4 місяці тому

    So going back to the section D test... Suppose that the actual secret number was 131. The actual answer has no lowest number. But that isn't one of the possible results. Would we get a checkmark when we test a code that has no lowest number? Or is this an impossible situation-- i.e. the game would not use this test for this number, and therefore we can deduce without testing anything that there *is* a lowest number (but still have no idea which one it is)?

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  4 місяці тому

      Do you have a time stamp for that? I shot this long enough ago I don't recall the example (I also MIGHT not recall the specific machine reaction for that scenario even if I was to check it).

    • @groza528
      @groza528 4 місяці тому

      @@WatchItPlayed Of course, sorry! Starts around 13:30

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  4 місяці тому +1

      Thanks! From my memory (which isn't perfect), I believe the game doesn't use that test for that kind of number, so you don't have to worry about that. If I'm wrong, please do come back and let me know if you experience it differently.

  • @maverickdelta
    @maverickdelta Рік тому

    Does the tray have to be dismantled each time you store the game?

  • @justenaallen1020
    @justenaallen1020 Рік тому

    Alan Turing

  • @EmanuelsWorkbench
    @EmanuelsWorkbench Рік тому

    Here's to hoping that the family is safe and that you didn't suffer to much damage from the storm....

    • @WatchItPlayed
      @WatchItPlayed  Рік тому +1

      We’re fortunate that nothing hit our house. No power for several days, and lots of fallen trees to clear out. We’re doing well though!

  • @jefferychow4765
    @jefferychow4765 5 місяців тому

    Yup he's canadian

  • @y0tub
    @y0tub Рік тому

    70th🎉

  • @deeza85za
    @deeza85za Рік тому +5

    First