When watching the movie, I suspect that when Marion suggests a place for Mrs. Bates, she's probably thinking of a nursing home or retirement community. People can get crazy as they get older. However, Norman looks at Marion and says, "You mean an institution?" The way he describes a mental hospital in grim detail while not even blinking at Marion suggests he's seen this before. Gives me the creeps every time I watch that.
Jessica Jayes That's exactly the impression I got too. I always thought Marion was suggesting a nursing home or something of the like, and Norman's reaction gives an interesting insight into how he perceives reality. Everyone's out to get him. He immediately assumes that she means a mental asylum, and the way he goes into detail about them suggests that he has had prior experiences involving them. Very well written film.
This was not mentioned in the video, but in the book Norman was briefly put in a mental hospital after he murdered his mother and her boyfriend. He had managed to successfully pass off his crime as a murder/suicide committed by his mom, but suffered severe shock. If I remember correctly, the authorities found him in a catatonic state. Norman was released after a month and then dug up his mother.
I’ve been watching Psycho every October and intermediately throughout the year for around five years now, and I finally got around to watching the entire Psycho franchise. After, I read the books. You cannot believe how hard it was to try and picture somebody other than Anthony Perkins as Norman Bates. Honestly, so many people have oversimplified Norman’s story. I always felt like the three personalities were clear. Too many people think Norman is a ‘crazy transvestite’ because they heard the word at the end and couldn’t retain anything else from the movie.
it's shown in Bates Motel that Norman's psyche is really broken into the three personalities, but is in a sweet akward teenager kinda way, they really explain the character and his complex psyche
My mother let me see this when I was 7-8. Yea.... I didn't shower for like a month, and when I eventually did, I kept the curtain open the whole time staring at the door. Good times....
I kind of feel so bad for Norman. A man abused by his own mother and insanity caused by it. I would want to give him a hug as long as he doesn't stab me.
2:06 - The reason the character's name Mary Crane was changed to Marion is because there was an actual woman named Mary Crane living in Phoenix, Arizona - where the film is set in the opening scenes - at the time production began.
Just received my copy of the book today and finished it in one sitting. Highly recommend, Bloch is a great writer and he keeps the short book moving along at a pretty good clip. Every single line keeps you hooked, even knowing the twist, the prose is just that good.
I would like to point out how heavily Norman is into psychology in the book. He even self-analyzes himself and comes quite close to diagnosing his own schizophrenia, but only the adult norman and little boy norman part of him. He also tries to talk to his mother about how he might have an Oedipus complex. Which she scolds him and calls him disgusting for it.
For some reason, I also want Cinefix to talk "What's the Difference" between original films and remakes. A Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th, Halloween, The Thing, The Fly, The Blob, etc.
another curious fact is that Bloch was one of Lovecraft's proteges way back in the day... so one master of horror who educated another who created a psychopath who couldn't pick up a decapitated head
Watched the original Psycho with my son when he was 10. The scene with Norman and Mary talking in the back office of the hotel had him freaked out. He literally asked me "Which ones the psycho?" Hicthcock really knew how to pluck at the primal fears of humans.
Incas didn’t have ziggurats, they made their homes out of stone and thatched roofs. Also, they weren’t naked or wearing teeth necklace, they were familiar with gold and high level members would wear masks and jewelry out of gold
The comments are about a weird movie, taken from a weird teleplay, taken from a weird book, taken from an actual criminal case, of an actual psychopath's crimes. So, why wouldn't, at least, some of these comments be weird?!
I forgot it was originally a book, and I prefer to stick with memories of movie version, which really creeped me out. Poor Janet Leigh, she revealed that she could never take showers after making that movie
I never got that the bound volume contained pornography. They buried sex in such subtle innuendo back then that I completely missed it. I think I thought it was a diary or something. Dammit, now I have to watch the movie again.
Humans at least us Americans hate being reminded how truly disgusting we are that's why married couples slept in two twin sized beds in television shows...
Yeah, the first 25 minutes of the movie is basically a mini Hitchcock TM movie. All those little one-in-a-million bad luck moments that bite the immoral protagonist in the ass are a common theme in the standard Hitchcock movie, though they're normally spread out a little thinner, making them a bit more plausible. But it seems like Hitchcock specifically wanted to trick the audience into thinking they were in for more of the same old trademark Hitchcock shtick, before he pulled the rug out from under them. That meant having to rush to get his little standard mini-movie over and done with so he could interrupt it with the invention of the slasher flick. So, consequently he had to pile on a lot of those tension-building bad-luck "coincidences" in a row... almost to the point of absurdity.
I always thought it was a little bit excessive how many forced-coincidence moments Marion had on her way to the motel (to ratchet up the trademark Hitchcock tension extra fast), seeing her boss and running into the same cop twice. And the fact that the cop doesn't do more to check out this cartoonishly suspicious person is almost farcical. That cop would have to be like Chief Wiggum to shrug off such obvious warning signs.
There is one other minor difference: In the book, Arbogast reassures Lila that his investigation led him to Fairvale independently, while movie Arbogast brags that he followed them from Phoenix.
Can you make "The silence of the lamb" what´s the difference? My Husband just saw it for the first time ever and really like it, I just watch it again with him and still amazed that is so good... :D Thanks!
They are very similar expect for part of Jame's back story and Hannibals appearance some of his dialogue and the Jack Crawford subplot I would like to see it though since the Hannibal books are my favorite.
mothafuckathomaselliot And its glorious that was my main problem with the movie Hannibal besides Julianne Moore but they still find because of his hand x-ray but most people have five fingers.
My parents knew Ed. They were teenagers when all this happened and all lived in plainfield. My grandmas house was across the street from the hardware store too....its pretty cool.
its funny to hear what movies were panned by critics back when they were released but are now considered classic films that everyone must see. i wonder what films will be like that from our generation
Psycho might have had mixed reviews but listening to the commentary many times - the shower scene was electrifying for something perceived diabolical for its day.
Artist Film I was talking about your comment with my mother and she told me that what you said was true for her. She refused to shower unless someone else was in the house after watching the film for about a month. I've never seen Psycho but after comment I still debate on watching it.
ThatDork Oh I see, well it is always interesting to hear about how other people thought of the film when it was released in that day and how other people have perceived it. It is one of my favourite horror films to this day. I like it a lot because it was also the inspiration for John Carpenters Halloween, believe it or not. I’ve listened to the commentary many times and is always quite intriguing one way or another. Thanks for your input!
There's one major difference you neglected to mention. Both the book and the film end explaining that the Mother personality has taken over, and both monologues include the phrase "wouldn't hurt a fly" but they exist in different contexts: When Mother thinks it at the end of the book, she's essentially thinking that Norman was the murderous part of their joint personality and she took over for his own good. That's why she wouldn't hurt a fly. At the end of the movie, it's more insidious, like she isn't hurting the fly on camera for the benefit of the doctors. That way she'll enjoy a prompt release; the audience is still left to wonder whether or not she's sincerely passive.
Which ending do you prefer? I haven't read the book, but the way you made it explain, the Mother in the book sounds more nefarious while in the movie she's smarter. I think I might prefer the movie ending, but both are really good in their own way.
+UberNeuman interesting fact - his ascent up the stairs was actually him walking backwards down them, then the footage played in reverse, which gives a subtly unreal feel to the scene. Personally though, my favourite of the series is Psycho II. A hugely underrated film.
The killer who inspired psycho is the same guy who was the inspiration for buffalo bill in silence of the lambs. Speaking of which, that would make a very good what's the difference episode.
"you have got to flush your math women!, or else we will know you are smart!" i dont know why it makes me laugh my ass of so hard. the sexism back in the day 1950s was really similar.
Just a note - the movie does indeed ignore the novel's subplot about Sam being attracted to Lila, but in the film "Psycho II" it is revealed that the two later got married.
I have heard that they put that long explanation of Norman's mental state at the end of the movie, because it was quite controverrial having a man dressed like a woman at that time. So they explained everything to state clearly that Norman was mentally ill.
2:36-2:45 Also, the novel versions of Norman Bates and his mother sound eerily similar to Danny DeVito and Anne Ramsey in "Throw Mama From the Train" (1987) Wonder who remembers *that* weird piece of movie...
Anne Ramsey genuinely scared me. Maybe it's her voice and looks idk but something about her scared me as a kid. There was also that movie with her and Kristy Swanson where Kristy throws a basketball at her head and it explodes.
Southern Deplorable I know what you're talking about! It was Wes Craven's "Deadly Friend" (1986). I thought that "death by basketball" was hilarious. It's the ending that scared the shit out of me.
When watching the movie, I suspect that when Marion suggests a place for Mrs. Bates, she's probably thinking of a nursing home or retirement community. People can get crazy as they get older. However, Norman looks at Marion and says, "You mean an institution?" The way he describes a mental hospital in grim detail while not even blinking at Marion suggests he's seen this before. Gives me the creeps every time I watch that.
Jessica Jayes That's exactly the impression I got too. I always thought Marion was suggesting a nursing home or something of the like, and Norman's reaction gives an interesting insight into how he perceives reality. Everyone's out to get him. He immediately assumes that she means a mental asylum, and the way he goes into detail about them suggests that he has had prior experiences involving them. Very well written film.
This was not mentioned in the video, but in the book Norman was briefly put in a mental hospital after he murdered his mother and her boyfriend. He had managed to successfully pass off his crime as a murder/suicide committed by his mom, but suffered severe shock. If I remember correctly, the authorities found him in a catatonic state. Norman was released after a month and then dug up his mother.
@@mphylo2296 can
That talking skull face at the shower reveal scared the hell out of me!
+BanditIncorporated BAM! YOU GOT NORMA'D!!
CineFix I did! Thankfully I haven't been decapitated, which I now know is a Normad thing. Thanx for the amazing vide, as always :D
I jumped out of my skin! Love your vids
BANDIT
Me too
I’ve been watching Psycho every October and intermediately throughout the year for around five years now, and I finally got around to watching the entire Psycho franchise. After, I read the books. You cannot believe how hard it was to try and picture somebody other than Anthony Perkins as Norman Bates.
Honestly, so many people have oversimplified Norman’s story. I always felt like the three personalities were clear. Too many people think Norman is a ‘crazy transvestite’ because they heard the word at the end and couldn’t retain anything else from the movie.
it's shown in Bates Motel that Norman's psyche is really broken into the three personalities, but is in a sweet akward teenager kinda way, they really explain the character and his complex psyche
My mother let me see this when I was 7-8. Yea.... I didn't shower for like a month, and when I eventually did, I kept the curtain open the whole time staring at the door. Good times....
I was much younger than that D:
If you kept the curtain open, did any water splash on the floor?
I kind of feel so bad for Norman. A man abused by his own mother and insanity caused by it. I would want to give him a hug as long as he doesn't stab me.
Boo Rhyne long as you're not a young hot girl he ain't stabbin u. Unless u mess with his mommy.
Boo Rhyne he’s a creep I don’t feel bad for him
2:06 - The reason the character's name Mary Crane was changed to Marion is because there was an actual woman named Mary Crane living in Phoenix, Arizona - where the film is set in the opening scenes - at the time production began.
Just received my copy of the book today and finished it in one sitting. Highly recommend, Bloch is a great writer and he keeps the short book moving along at a pretty good clip. Every single line keeps you hooked, even knowing the twist, the prose is just that good.
I think the book is underrated.
I'm amazed at how many novels have a reference to someones love for reading books. It always seems like a standard part of any plot.
Well, normally writers put parts of themselves in their books, and normally writers love reading books, so there it is :)
It's about time someone on UA-cam gave some acknowledgement of the A&E show. That show is really underrated.
If anyone finds the clip at 9:11,you'll greatly rewarded
Hyde Rants Still no luck?
dude what?
who else was disturbed in some way when one character gets a knife stuck in her mouth
I know right!? That was Psycho II, it went from a mildly violent film, too... that!
BTW Sam Loomis is the doctor's name in Halloween.
Book Norman Bates looks a lot like Pat from Super Best Friends Play.
I would like to point out how heavily Norman is into psychology in the book. He even self-analyzes himself and comes quite close to diagnosing his own schizophrenia, but only the adult norman and little boy norman part of him. He also tries to talk to his mother about how he might have an Oedipus complex. Which she scolds him and calls him disgusting for it.
For some reason, I also want Cinefix to talk "What's the Difference" between original films and remakes. A Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th, Halloween, The Thing, The Fly, The Blob, etc.
"It was the knife that a few seconds later cut off her scream, and her head." Bloch does not get much better than that.
Dammit I just realized that Andrew Garfield looks like Anthony Perkins
Lol same
Now THERE’S someone to cast Norman in the remake
@@KBGVideos1 Yup and considering that Garfield is a versatile actor, he could play the part perfectly.
@@EternalRoman I fully agree
@@EternalRoman In case they go book accurate, they can cast Joaquin Phoenix. Just my suggestion.
I do find it really interesting that Psycho was the first movie with a flushing toilet
Right, and "Leave It To Beaver" was the first TV series to show a part of a toilet bowl (the tank).
another curious fact is that Bloch was one of Lovecraft's proteges way back in the day... so one master of horror who educated another who created a psychopath who couldn't pick up a decapitated head
Clever using Norman saying “no not really... anyway”
Watched the original Psycho with my son when he was 10. The scene with Norman and Mary talking in the back office of the hotel had him freaked out. He literally asked me "Which ones the psycho?" Hicthcock really knew how to pluck at the primal fears of humans.
When I watched this, and the famous Birds, I was completely unphased.
😂😂😂😂 awww
do a what's the difference of "John carpenter's the thing" and it's book counterpart "who goes there?"
i'll be honest these have gotten me to read the books
In the book, Norman was a compulsive alcohol drinker. In the film, Norman is a compulsive candy muncher. Interesting.
I think it's linked to the eternal childhood that the movie is trying to portray
can we appreciate the beautiful cinematography of this movie? 🎥
who ever edited this deserves a gold star good job XD i died to all the visual gags!
Incas didn’t have ziggurats, they made their homes out of stone and thatched roofs. Also, they weren’t naked or wearing teeth necklace, they were familiar with gold and high level members would wear masks and jewelry out of gold
All south american civilizations are Aztecs for them
$10 for a woman suit is a great deal. The amount of time and money I had to put into making my own almost wasn't worth it.
Why is this comment section so weird?
sorted by newest instead of most popular, someone wanted to censor unfavorable opinions :/
Why do people keep asking that 😆 I can’t see nothing
Serial Killer flicks attact weird comentators
@@Jeffrey314159 Good point
The comments are about a weird movie, taken from a weird teleplay, taken from a weird book, taken from an actual criminal case, of an actual psychopath's crimes. So, why wouldn't, at least, some of these comments be weird?!
Suggestion: American Psycho - What´s the difference, also: thanks for the videos, they´re great.
I forgot it was originally a book, and I prefer to stick with memories of movie version, which really creeped me out. Poor Janet Leigh, she revealed that she could never take showers after making that movie
I never got that the bound volume contained pornography. They buried sex in such subtle innuendo back then that I completely missed it. I think I thought it was a diary or something. Dammit, now I have to watch the movie again.
WalterLiddy yeah, there was trouble bc of a flushing toilet of all things 😂
Y'all need to do The Exorcist
Having read The Exorcist, I think there's not a lot to pick apart. The movie is a very faithful adaptation.
What's The Difference:
A Clockwork Orange
I'm so happy to have come across this channel, you guys are awesome!! I especially love this series!!
Please make What's the difference between "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" and the "Blade Runner".
Please Please Please
please do Stephen king "IT"
"...because apparently Hitchcock has a shred of human decency!"
Tippi Hedren: X Doubt
Have you read/heard what Stanly Kubrick put Shelly Duvall thru while making THE SHINING? Hitchcock was a gentleman by contrast
2:16 Book about Incas but shows a Maya Pyramid.
do murder on the orient express and Death on the Nile
Seconding! We need some Poirot!
thanks
I listen to videos in the shower and I almost listened to this before remembering the shower scene. I’d rather not be paranoid while in the shower
Man I fell in love with your series
To think that showing a toilet was controversial in 1960.
A very different era. Cinefix has a video about movies during the Haye's Code era
Humans at least us Americans hate being reminded how truly disgusting we are that's why married couples slept in two twin sized beds in television shows...
the skeleton face scared the crap out of me lol.....
Same😂
SAME I WAS TERRIFIED
After, when bates came down in the wig... That scared the crap out of me.... And i was 10!!!!
yeah the skeleton didn't get me but the music and norman entering with the knife did lmao
they changed the name from Mary to Marion, obviously the most important of all changes
I actually used this for a paper that I had write about this . And I got an A on it.
I think I like movie Norman more, it's much more creepy for him to be a young handsome man and much more disarming
6:57 Scared the fucking shit out of me!..
what a ridiculous statement from the New York Times about this film on it's release. that critic probably had a brief career.
no better than the crap they put out now!
@@Timic83tc you're a clueless idiot
Just subscribed. Nice channel yall, very fun and compelling content :)
I've heard a theory that Sam from Halloween is Sam from psycho
Slasher Fan he was named after him from the script writing perspective
*"You've gotta flush your math women! Otherwise we'll know you're smart!"*
LOL. Noted. Thanks for the tip. XD
Might have to read the novel after watching bates motel and psycho
Yeah, the first 25 minutes of the movie is basically a mini Hitchcock TM movie.
All those little one-in-a-million bad luck moments that bite the immoral protagonist in the ass are a common theme in the standard Hitchcock movie, though they're normally spread out a little thinner, making them a bit more plausible. But it seems like Hitchcock specifically wanted to trick the audience into thinking they were in for more of the same old trademark Hitchcock shtick, before he pulled the rug out from under them. That meant having to rush to get his little standard mini-movie over and done with so he could interrupt it with the invention of the slasher flick. So, consequently he had to pile on a lot of those tension-building bad-luck "coincidences" in a row... almost to the point of absurdity.
I always thought it was a little bit excessive how many forced-coincidence moments Marion had on her way to the motel (to ratchet up the trademark Hitchcock tension extra fast), seeing her boss and running into the same cop twice. And the fact that the cop doesn't do more to check out this cartoonishly suspicious person is almost farcical. That cop would have to be like Chief Wiggum to shrug off such obvious warning signs.
RIP to Anthony Perkins and Janet Leigh
There is one other minor difference: In the book, Arbogast reassures Lila that his investigation led him to Fairvale independently, while movie Arbogast brags that he followed them from Phoenix.
Bates Motel is really great too.
Can you make "The silence of the lamb" what´s the difference? My Husband just saw it for the first time ever and really like it, I just watch it again with him and still amazed that is so good... :D Thanks!
+alejandra reyes Nice one!
+CineFix YES please do silence of the lambs
They are very similar expect for part of Jame's back story and Hannibals appearance some of his dialogue and the Jack Crawford subplot I would like to see it though since the Hannibal books are my favorite.
The only real difference is that hannibal actually gets real facial surgery and that he has 2 middle fingers.
mothafuckathomaselliot And its glorious that was my main problem with the movie Hannibal besides Julianne Moore but they still find because of his hand x-ray but most people have five fingers.
Leatherface: Hey, I also was inspired by Ed Gein.
Buffalo Bill too right?
@@takingtheshot9830 Yes
Where's the dancing lady at 9:10 from?
You know.....for scientific research purposes.
Still searching lol
In the novel, Marion Crane lives in Fort Worth, Texas, not San Antonio, Texas as this video mistakenly states
Yeah. In the movie, she lives in Phoenix, AZ.
If you need a Spoiler Alert for Psycho, I'm glad you're outta that 50 year coma. Time for Leg Day
6:56 Holy crap, that scared the shit outta me!!
found this channel a month ago, gotta say, this is my favourite channel about movies n stuff! keep up the awesome job!
+Temuulen Altangerel Thanks! We love movies n stuff!
@6:57 Important.
The rare case when the movie is better than book.
You should do the Hannibal Lecter novels.
multitudeofidols The TV series isn't based on the novels.
Wow look how many new comments are. Woah.
2:36-2:45
I laughed at that animation a bit harder than I should've.
I loved book Norman's portrayal in this video! Great video
What's the difference: The Silence of the Lambs I hope ya'll do it
you should do a video about forest gump. it's crazy how different the movie is compared to the book.
My parents knew Ed. They were teenagers when all this happened and all lived in plainfield. My grandmas house was across the street from the hardware store too....its pretty cool.
its funny to hear what movies were panned by critics back when they were released but are now considered classic films that everyone must see. i wonder what films will be like that from our generation
Watchmen
i shit you not, batman v superman will be praised 5 years from now, remember the word...
There's an old Bates Motel outside loami, Illinois.
I'm trying to figure out why didn't the 1998 version follow the book
Psycho might have had mixed reviews but listening to the commentary many times - the shower scene was electrifying for something perceived diabolical for its day.
Artist Film I was talking about your comment with my mother and she told me that what you said was true for her. She refused to shower unless someone else was in the house after watching the film for about a month. I've never seen Psycho but after comment I still debate on watching it.
ThatDork Oh I see, well it is always interesting to hear about how other people thought of the film when it was released in that day and how other people have perceived it. It is one of my favourite horror films to this day. I like it a lot because it was also the inspiration for John Carpenters Halloween, believe it or not. I’ve listened to the commentary many times and is always quite intriguing one way or another. Thanks for your input!
"But in the film...Oooh yah yah yah yah!" 😭😭😂
Marion and Norman have dinner in the parlor next to the motel office, not his house. Cheers
Thank you! I was about to mention this also, but you beat me to it.
There's one major difference you neglected to mention. Both the book and the film end explaining that the Mother personality has taken over, and both monologues include the phrase "wouldn't hurt a fly" but they exist in different contexts:
When Mother thinks it at the end of the book, she's essentially thinking that Norman was the murderous part of their joint personality and she took over for his own good. That's why she wouldn't hurt a fly. At the end of the movie, it's more insidious, like she isn't hurting the fly on camera for the benefit of the doctors. That way she'll enjoy a prompt release; the audience is still left to wonder whether or not she's sincerely passive.
Which ending do you prefer? I haven't read the book, but the way you made it explain, the Mother in the book sounds more nefarious while in the movie she's smarter. I think I might prefer the movie ending, but both are really good in their own way.
I say I'd prefer the movie as well, both because its a master example of its medium, and because the characters are more compelling.
So many great scenes in the film, but the one with Arbogast getting knifed and falling down the stairs still haunts me.
+UberNeuman interesting fact - his ascent up the stairs was actually him walking backwards down them, then the footage played in reverse, which gives a subtly unreal feel to the scene.
Personally though, my favourite of the series is Psycho II. A hugely underrated film.
The killer who inspired psycho is the same guy who was the inspiration for buffalo bill in silence of the lambs. Speaking of which, that would make a very good what's the difference episode.
How did I not see this coming?
"you have got to flush your math women!, or else we will know you are smart!"
i dont know why it makes me laugh my ass of so hard. the sexism back in the day 1950s was really similar.
Is it me or do the images of book Norman look like Rich Evans from Red Letter Media?
Rudy Salas book norm look like that collagehumor Guy
I read the book first then watched, good to know what was going on in Norma's head
Just a note - the movie does indeed ignore the novel's subplot about Sam being attracted to Lila, but in the film "Psycho II" it is revealed that the two later got married.
If I were Marion Crane's ghost I'd haunt the shit out of them like a japanese horror movie
Can we get “I know what you did last summer” what’s the difference?
wasn’t that movie based on a story from scary stories to tell in the dark
Lila dies in the second movie
Thank you
I have heard that they put that long explanation of Norman's mental state at the end of the movie, because it was quite controverrial having a man dressed like a woman at that time. So they explained everything to state clearly that Norman was mentally ill.
The explanation in the movie is still mostly the same as the explanation at the end of the book, including a mention of tranvestism.
You should do One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest
In the psycho 2 book, Norman never made it to Hollywood...
Safe bet you're going to spot as many differences you can. had a giggle at that one.
2:36-2:45
Also, the novel versions of Norman Bates and his mother sound eerily similar to Danny DeVito and Anne Ramsey in "Throw Mama From the Train" (1987)
Wonder who remembers *that* weird piece of movie...
Now that you mention it you've got a point.
Joe Parrigen Oh shit! Someone else remembers lol
Anne Ramsey genuinely scared me. Maybe it's her voice and looks idk but something about her scared me as a kid. There was also that movie with her and Kristy Swanson where Kristy throws a basketball at her head and it explodes.
Southern Deplorable I know what you're talking about! It was Wes Craven's "Deadly Friend" (1986).
I thought that "death by basketball" was hilarious. It's the ending that scared the shit out of me.
That movie is actually based on Patricia Highsmith's "Strangers On A Train" - a book that, oddly enough, Hitchcock adapted but butchered.
There was a movie with Anthony Hopkins that was pretty good about Hitchcock
Jacob Staten Yes!
Didn't look much like him but the influx was spot in
Do one about American psycho
I'd like to see a
what's the difference: fear and loathing in Las Vegas!!!!!!
Please!!!
+RadieschenVonOben It is firmly on our list!
Casey Redmon, oh thank you cinefix
I will pay this youtube channel to do this series on the lord of the rings books.
Do Percy Jackson both