Ladies and gentleman welcome back to "People Pretend To Not Understand Pragmatics" the show in which people pretend that context doesn't give any information to purposefully make incorrect assumptions! Today we have Clb9000. So Clb why did you choose to ignore pragmatics today?
He took one more hour because the chess actors union were undergoing negotiations with Simp for today's video. As we have seen, it must've went well for both sides.
@@jakethebeest2376 The two rooks I saw, but the pawn and queen I missed. That's probably the better approach, though, as the Queen is much stronger in the middle of the board than off in a corner.
I was incorrect, but for anyone wondering Bottled Lightning is: You must move your king if able. I assumed that's why the opponent wasn't moving anything touching his king.
Guessing your opponent's drawbacks based on their play when they don't reveal them seems like an amusement, maybe there's something you can do around that for content purposes.
6:28 calling black's drawback "easy" ?? i think someone has hacked the system ... 9:29 again, black has been given a drawback that is IMPOSSIBLE to manage ... literally will be dead in THREE turns, no escape
Wait a moment. Didn't you say in the beginning of the speedrun that you would only increase the rating if you won 2/3 games? Like, yes, it's funny that you always find a way to say 100% winrate, but what is the point of winning, if your rating is increased either way? Isn't that the fun of a chess rating speedrun? To get high rating with as few games as possible? Why not just resign every game then?
I don't understand why everyone picks on SIMP's math. He never gets the math wrong. He just always does the wrong math. It's the English language that he's failing at. And yes, I did end that last sentence with a preposition.
simp should invest in some bank, after having 300% winrate loaning his 200% winrate in case of cheating oponents on future videos to take back his loan and get the winrate right
Bro skipped past the part where he won a free rook…
Title is a lie, you reveal your drawback!
300% hundred is normal so?
Yes 300 % is normal
Becouse the real name of simp is "no one"
Ladies and gentleman welcome back to "People Pretend To Not Understand Pragmatics" the show in which people pretend that context doesn't give any information to purposefully make incorrect assumptions! Today we have Clb9000. So Clb why did you choose to ignore pragmatics today?
Simp is not a one, he's a ten
6:38 I love how quick he was like "Probably a mouse slip, anyway next game."
>The series where I always get 100% winrate
>Grants himself 300%
He took one more hour because the chess actors union were undergoing negotiations with Simp for today's video.
As we have seen, it must've went well for both sides.
CAG-AFTY
chess actors guild - all for the youtubers
8:32 blunders a Queen. After Nh3, opponent could have gone Qxc2. Next move, Simp was forced to go Kf3, so opponent could win a Queen
could've even taken the knight on A3
it's not a blunder if your opponent doesn't see it
It actually also blunders both rooks. Because you can't recapture after taking one of them
@@jakethebeest2376 The two rooks I saw, but the pawn and queen I missed. That's probably the better approach, though, as the Queen is much stronger in the middle of the board than off in a corner.
can't opponent go qxd4 and then simp is forced to advance to kf3 then qg4#? haven't played chess in a couple of years, so i could be wrong
8:34 if Qxc2 ,you're cooked.
Or even Qxa3
@bee_irl have to remove queen's defender. Qxa3 doesn't work
Qxd4, Kf3 is forced, Qg4#
Man, had you randomly gone after the last opponent's pawns, you'd have eviscerated him.
2:03 I'm predicting his drawback is bottled lightning
I was incorrect, but for anyone wondering Bottled Lightning is: You must move your king if able. I assumed that's why the opponent wasn't moving anything touching his king.
8:33 your opponent could have played Qxc2 winning the queen, as your king was forced to move to f3 due of the drawback, leaving the queen undefended.
Guessing your opponent's drawbacks based on their play when they don't reveal them seems like an amusement, maybe there's something you can do around that for content purposes.
“If you don’t correctly identify the opponents drawback before the end of the game, you lose”
There were no uploads for 2 days, we thought something happened, like Magnus Carlsen winning over you
Or simp winning over Magnus Carlsen.
100 rated chess, but I play Magnus Carlsen.
But how can Magnus Carlsen win over himself?
Slow opening
Takes enemy rook on turn 5
These statements don't seem to match up lol
6:27 omg couldn’t stop laughing
8:34 You blundered Qxc2, sir
You liar! You said always 100% winrate. And now you got 300%. I trusted you man 😭😭
Enjoyable content once again❤
3:40 i literally thought he had bottled lightning
What is bottled lightning?
@@SoujiOkitaTwo Bottled Lightning is: You must move your king if able
Ok but in that last one, if your king had been in the red when taking the enemy king, would you have won or lost?
Today's correct winrate: 100%
Let me guess: you’re not an Asian?
another complaint about estrogen
bro on daylight saving today, one hour later than usual
His country doesn’t do daylight savings.
Hey, wait wait wait, I thought you always got a 100% win rate!
Skipping the free rook? What!!
simp is a nobody confirmed
Reveal Drawback only after you move a queen or rook.
You must checkmate your opponent in 20-(the number of moves you have already played).
And without any further ado, let's all comment on this video on how this video is awesome
8:34 Opponent missed Qxd4, Kf3 is forced, Qg4#
3:45
black's drawback is so insanely hard to manage, i would resign out of pure annoyance
6:28
calling black's drawback "easy" ?? i think someone has hacked the system ...
9:29 again, black has been given a drawback that is IMPOSSIBLE to manage ... literally will be dead in THREE turns, no escape
4:00 I guess you could also say that it's super easy
I love me a good 10 min simp video
Wait a moment. Didn't you say in the beginning of the speedrun that you would only increase the rating if you won 2/3 games? Like, yes, it's funny that you always find a way to say 100% winrate, but what is the point of winning, if your rating is increased either way? Isn't that the fun of a chess rating speedrun? To get high rating with as few games as possible? Why not just resign every game then?
I don't understand why everyone picks on SIMP's math. He never gets the math wrong. He just always does the wrong math. It's the English language that he's failing at. And yes, I did end that last sentence with a preposition.
Hello No One, when did you change your name?
I think his win rate is a bit off, he won far more games, so it should be way higher than 300%
Thank you for entertaining content
simp should invest in some bank, after having 300% winrate loaning his 200% winrate in case of cheating oponents on future videos to take back his loan and get the winrate right
sigma video, well done.
stop lying about your winrate
Noice
Not 300%, 100%. Still outstanding regardless, not a single game lost. Very rewarding.