Topaz Video Frame Interpolation Comparison AI Apollo VS Chronos VS Chronos Fast Model

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Buy Topaz: topazlabs.com/ref/2213/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
In this video, you'll see my comparison test on Frame Interpolation using All three Model AI available in Topaz Video AI Ver 3.1.9 to see whic AI model is the best.
New comparison with more ways to check the difference: • Topaz video AI Frame I...
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Upgrade your storage while nvme SSDs are at their lowest price:
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB - amzn.to/3JtDe02
Samsung 980 pro 1TB - amzn.to/43TfudS
Samsung 990 pro 2TB - amzn.to/3NKjlUV
WD sn770 1TB - amzn.to/3CImeiQ
Pretty much all SSDs are heavily discounted on amazon right now. I would appreciate it if you could use my link when you buy on the platform, it gives me a tiny comission fee if you did: amzn.to/3NnkPTF
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Amazon prime free 30 days trial:
amzn.to/3MFnfNf
Topaz Video AI focuses solely on completing a few video enhancement tasks really well: deinterlacing, upscaling, and motion interpolation. We've taken five years to craft AI models robust enough for natural results on real-world footage.
‍
Topaz Video AI will also take full advantage of your modern workstation, as we partner directly with hardware manufacturers to optimize processing times. (Many of them already use Topaz Video AI to benchmark AI inference.) Own the software and use it for as many projects as you like, right in your existing workflow.
System Information:
CPU: 13th Gen Intel Core i5-13500
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
Render Time:
Apollo: 21m40s
Chronos: 13m31s
Chronos Fast: 8m42s
#topaz #frameinterpolation #AI

[@StrongzGame]

i appreciate you making this man

[@Ecstfx]

Chronos Fast is smoother

[@clearstoryimaging]

Apollo is the clear winner, but Chronos is a close second and considerably faster.

[@Graff_Zeppelin]

but i think Chronos more smooth than Apollo, the only problem render Chronos Fast take 1 hour to render 1.30 minute.

[@sensible4170]

New comparison with more ways to check the difference: ua-cam.com/video/axQ25O8E-MQ/v-deo.html

[@marcus_ohreallyus]

Thats a horrible way to show the difference. Bad choice of footage and showing all of those examples at once is confusing and distracting.

[@TheInvoker78]

name of the song?

[@the_turan]

"Moon Halo" from Honkai Impact 3rd

[@estudiantes68]

Chronos fast produces terrible artifacts when there's a fixed logo over moving scenes. I avoid Chronos fast like the pest.
Apollo is for fixing choppy video (it analizes 4 consecutive frames to recreate one frame). For this reason, Apollo takes much longer to process. For perfect motion 25 fps videos I always choose the normal Chronos (not Fast Chronos) to convert the video to 50 fps. Then, if I'm creating a DVD, I use Adobe Premiere to render the 50 fps output to 25 fps interlaced, and I get very smooth motion videos.

[@marcocalado78]

Frame interpolation it's not the Topaz hot spot yet. I prefer leave it for premiere optical flow. Stable better results and lot faster.

[@vuminhquan2011ify]

Are you sure ? Topaz is use TensorRT AI to interpolate the frame ,premiere optical flow just use filter to make the smoother video , not real 60 fps and higher

[@marcocalado78]

@@vuminhquan2011ify There is no Ai miracle on frame interpolation. All of them do the same thing. The difference is that some leave artifacts and motion blur on ghosted frames, Like topaz. Just bake 2 videos and test frame by frame. You can go through all the neat topaz methods, but optical flow it's still the best. You got to use all the tools wisely, or your videos will look like oil paintings.

[@marcocalado78]

@stylezzzz5595 Forget about ghosting, none remove it well unless you want your scenes to look like a paranormal movie.

[@mickey_sensei]

Everything is same

[@cmoneytheman]

no

[@Mutherite]

😂