U.N. Neutrality Enables Evil Regimes | New Ideal Podcast
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 кві 2024
- The UN's open-door policy allows dictatorial and theocratic regimes to gain credibility and power within the organization. Elan and Ben explain how its neutrality enables evil. Watch the full video here: • The Shameful UN Resolu...
Subscribe to ARI’s UA-cam channel to make sure you never miss a video:
ua-cam.com/users/subscription_...
Download or stream free courses on Ayn Rand’s works and ideas with the Ayn Rand University app:
- App Store itunes.apple.com/us/app/ayn-r...
- Google Play play.google.com/store/apps/de...
ARI is funded by donor contributions. You can support our work by becoming an ARI Member or making a one-time contribution: ari.aynrand.org/donate
******
Keep in Touch! Sign up to receive email updates from ARI: aynrand.org/signup
Follow ARI on Twitter: / aynrandinst
Follow ARI on Facebook: / aynrandinstitute
Follow ARI on Instagram: / aynrandorg
Subscribe to the ARI Live! podcast: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
******
Explore these ideas further! ARI's online publication, New Ideal, explores pressing cultural issues from the perspective of Ayn Rand’s philosophy, Objectivism: newideal.aynrand.org/
Join an upcoming virtual or in-person event: ari.aynrand.org/events/
Visit ARI’s website for more about our content and programs: ari.aynrand.org/
All decent countries should leave UN.
Read "The Anatomy of Compromise" and how it "hastnens the victory of evil"
Excellent condensation to core principles by ARI as typical.
Spot on as usual
There’s an objective problem of evil in the world, yes
Problem is people with fake morelity known as leftist ideology don’t tolerate people with mind
So true!
Amen
You're beating a dead horse. Over 50 years ago. Rand inquired of the moral nature of a body that includes the worst dictatorships. However, there is one nation that is worse than the dictatorships. That would be the nation that claims moral leadership while being is that body
She didn't "inquire," she condemned the UN and moral neutrality. Why try to deflect the evil of the UN by condemning one particular member?
ALL rights-respecting and rights-protecting nations should leave, especially the US. But are there any rights-respecting nations, anymore?
@@volition51 I used the term "inquired" because she stated it in the from of a question "What is the moral status of...that includes the worst dictatorships?"" She know the answer, it was the "Socratic method"; putting the thesis in the form of a question to cause the other prrson to think. It used to be done in school and detective novels (meaning just after Columbo said "I hate to bother you, but just one more thing...")
@@SpacePatrollerLaser
You said the US was worse than a dictatorship. We aren't, at least not yet. But we do use the law to force a particular morality, so we may get there one day.
@@volition51 Read "The Anatomy of Compromise" the part oabout "hastens the victory of..." by conceding the opponents premises but being inconsistent, therefore incoherent therefore lacking integrity
@@SpacePatrollerLaser
If I do that, will you take back your slur against the United States? By "United States" I don't mean just the current government, but everything subsumed under that concept.
None listens to God, should be focusing on community getting together and working together and stop dividing amongst one another and take power and tax money control back, better look in to the name of the land and understand/innerstand whose in control of every thing and that is God with our interfering with our free will/choice