S3.3 Justice: Rawls

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @eeshakay5246
    @eeshakay5246 6 років тому +6

    studying for my LLB finals today and just covered all of Rawls by this video. Thank you so much. x

  • @asingh1174
    @asingh1174 2 роки тому

    thank you so much sir for this, you've explained really well :')

  • @tenda9965
    @tenda9965 4 роки тому

    Thank you, for making me understand in an easy way. you were not vague and u were understandable.

  • @arpanasingh8790
    @arpanasingh8790 6 років тому +1

    elucidated very well ,thank you

  • @tsegwaymidson7373
    @tsegwaymidson7373 2 роки тому

    This was the best!!!

  • @Ankit-wx5sk
    @Ankit-wx5sk 6 років тому +3

    Thank You for such an comprehensive analysis. I know this is long past but would you mind doing Fuller's Theory Of Justice Also. Thank You so much again.

  • @Behindyouu
    @Behindyouu 7 років тому

    Great Video! Thumbs Up

  • @mangalisoalexmathenjwa5349
    @mangalisoalexmathenjwa5349 6 років тому +1

    Thanks a lot for the video, I now can write my test.

  • @muhammadamirbinmustapha7454
    @muhammadamirbinmustapha7454 3 роки тому

    Secara keseluruhan saya faham penjelasan berkenaan teori keadilan Rawls ini, cuma bahagian kritikan oleh Nozick tu masih kurang jelas. Terima kasih tuan untuk video ini.

  • @ancyjohn7750
    @ancyjohn7750 4 роки тому

    that was a really quick sum up...

  • @sanjeevpatelrewam.p3613
    @sanjeevpatelrewam.p3613 5 років тому +1

    Such a good job sir ,salute to ur video,,,,,,pr kuch samajh nhi aaya

  • @nomcebomdlangathi3052
    @nomcebomdlangathi3052 7 років тому

    very useful, thanks.

  • @dhanushkasilva2340
    @dhanushkasilva2340 6 років тому

    well explained.

  • @rajeev572
    @rajeev572 7 років тому +1

    Really cvrd al topics

  • @mysterysonaa372
    @mysterysonaa372 2 роки тому

    🤔🤔🤔🤔

  • @jannetiktak9367
    @jannetiktak9367 6 років тому +1

    You say, in the first principle of justice, that everyone should have as much liberties as possible, but wasn't rawls saying that everyone should get all general liberties? So not all liberties?