5 Reasons Excel Tables Save Time: Why You Need MS Excel Tables to Work Productively
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
- Sign up for our Excel webinar, times added weekly: www.excelcampu...
Are you tired of wasting time on repetitive and tedious tasks in Excel? Look no further than this video on "5 Reasons Excel Tables Save Time: Why You Need MS Excel Tables to Work Productively".
In this tutorial, you'll learn how using Excel tables can streamline your workflow and boost your productivity by automating tasks like sorting, filtering, and formatting.
With clear and concise explanations, this video is perfect for both beginners and advanced users who want to take their Excel skills to the next level. So if you're ready to save time and work more efficiently, click play now and discover the power of Excel tables!
Check out our @ExcelCampus playlist on shortcuts here: • Tips & Shortcuts
MS Access is way better. The reason the average person doesn't use it is because they are afraid of it. I started using Access in '95, and it's been my go to data analytics tool. Excel is okay for small datasets but it has little muscle, comparatively, in Data Analytics....
How to prevent #SPILL in tables?
With table field names on, to reference a single cell, it's [@FieldName], vs [FieldName] for the whole list of data in that table's column.
Great
I agreed before but I saw some new stuff I did not know, thanks
You're welcome, Carnis! 😀
I always use tables now since completing Excel Campus training. It has saved me tons of time.
great! good to know!. 👍💯
Thanks for watching, Brent! 😀
short format is nice.
You can also put custom calculations in the "total" row, and when you add new rows, they'll be automatically calculated as well.
like👍82
As an accountant, I use Excel everyday..
but I think I only used I already knew..😌
I should utilize this good function Excel Tables👍
Thank you Jon!
You're very much welcome, Jessica! 😀
Excellent! Thank You
When using Excel Tables, remind me of the most convenient way to show the Totals row (or a copy of the Totals row) above the column headers. At the moment, I recall adding rows above the headings row of the Excel Table, then using an "=" formula referring to the Totals row cells at the bottom of the Excel Table.
Reason number 0 is the reliability of maintaining data in the table, without as much danger of lines getting lost outside or others included in calculations, leading to disastrous errors. Even so, I suspect that this is just a small gloss on top of the essentially wrong notion that all the calculations are really in the individual cells. Works for many things, not so much for all. Longstanding issue. But congrats to Excel for at least finally admitting that people like to group things into larger identifiable objects than the individual data entry space.
I am a huge fan of tables, BUT...
I have a bad experience with the speed of tables. When I use a big table (no so much a lot of rows, but with a lot of columns) with quite extensive formulas and XLookUp() (no, I don't use volatile functions), adding or removing or dragging cells/ranges in the workbook, or entering a new formula in a column, really really really slows everything to a grinding halt. Excel seems to be locked (while it is not, it is still working) and it takes up to 6 minutes before it comes back alive. It's just not doable. I tried lots of stuff, but nothing worked, until...
... I converted the tables to ranges and it completely (!) fixed that. (such a shame I lots the Tables of course)
Who has the same experience ? Has anyone found a solution that makes it possible to still use tables in large and complicated Excel models? I really would like to know.
Hi Eddy! Have you tried to turn off the *Auto Calculate* feature in the *Excel --> Options --> Formulas --> Calculation Options*::
There, change the Workbook calculation option from *Automatic* to *Automatic except for data tables* or to *Manual / Recalculate workbook before saving.*
It is not a great solution, yet it can save you the headache of waiting up to 6 minutes every time you enter a new value in any given cell.
@@excelgazialimuhiddinhacibekir thank you for your suggestion, and I indeed tried that (and lots of other stuff), but to no avail. It helps a little, but it's just a patch, not a real solution. I converted the table to a regular range and, bam, problem solved. So it seems to me that I can confidently conclude that the table itself was the problem. And I would just like to know a solution where I can keep tables as well as speed not negatively impacted by using tables.
I think Excel Tables are valuable when a person has a small amount of data and wants to quickly make it presentable over a short number of incremental updates. I also use Ranges and Conditional Formatting to handle larger sets of data, to keep response times quicker.
Thanks, Jon. This is a gamechanger for me.
That's good to know, Diane! 😀