We all should transition and have transsexual kids and and marry only with an transexual partner or same sex partner. And definitely not ban this gender affirming care they are protected in the constitution and in New York
i was just listening to your compatriots, sisters in law, among others expounding on what is likely in store as the landscape of our society undergoes radical revision. unbound by norms, laws, accountability and certainly not any internal moral compass; self-consciousness, shame, responsibility nor even an ability to foresee consequences. i despair. but i am truly grateful that despite no doubt busy lives, careers, and legitimate concern for your personal security, you guys continue to produce these enlightening, informative and humorous episodes...thank you
Right? It's great that they will support males lactating and breast feeding babies. We don't want sex based rights or discrimination, and we want males in all our female spaces to feel comfortable. We welcome them. We are kind, and we know they really are women. La Leche will be in court soon. Males have a right to join support group for breastfeeding mothers, and a right to have babies suckle their nipples. It is a great pleasure, and gender affirming, and we cannot deny them this euphoric experience.
this SCOTUS case makes me v nervous 🙃🙃🙃 I'm a gay trans man myself and I work as a therapist for primarily queer and trans youth; and I'm worried for my own healthcare, the healthcare of the kids I work with, and my ability to even do my job helping these kids. I just don't see it ending well, and I fear that any decision that hurts the trans community will further empower legislative or executive action to continue targeting the trans community 🙃🙃🙃
Nobody is being ‘targeted’. It’s about protecting children from medical experimentation and highly dubious ‘science’ in an area where minors can’t reasonably have informed consent. Destransitioners matter. Funny how the liberal media ignores them. Almost like they are in denial that detransitioners exist, because it undermines the very idea of a fixed gender identity. And if it’s not fixed, it’s not a meaningful class worthy under the 14th Amendment, as was argued in court. Strangio could not deny the basic logic that transgender identities are not necessarily fixed. Refuted.
In April 2024 the four-year, NHS England-commissioned review of pediatric gender medicine was submitted by Dr. Hilary Cass. The Cass Review has been fully accepted by the NHS, supported by the U.K. major political parties, and broadly embraced by the U.K. clinical community. As a result, the TAVISTOCK gender clinic was closed down.
And it is thoroughly fraudulent. Cherry picked data, absurd and laughable study design, many examples of direct lying in the report itself. The transphobes have no morals.
Oh what a missed opportunity for Judge Vladek to play Billy Paul singing Me and Mrs Jones. Not only would it mess with copyright playback but also slaps some levity on yet more eye-rolling discourse from the radical right. We got a thang goin on…😂
I love that show! Ladies you are awesome!!! It feel like I’m in Dejavu from Brazil - where I used to be a lawyer . I’m sad to see all of this here and around the world, actually. Btw, Melissa, I love your room decor 😍
Thank you for referring to Alexis Carrington Colby. The actress portraying Alexis perfectly inhabited both Lady Macbeth and a hilarious, campy send-up of the same character.😂
You question how SCOTUS can use logic to uphold a law against gender affirming care, when that logic was used to invalidate Loving v. Virginia. What makes you think they do not want to invalidate Loving?
There was an irony in watching them consume a beverage in celebration of the weakening of regulatory agencies, some of which regulate beverages similar to the very thing they were consuming.
Dear Strict Scrutiny and Strict Scrutiny Listeners... a question that has always been on my mind: how does one become a legal scholar / top legal mind in a particular area of law? I have always just been curious on what criteria, loose or well defined, it gets based off of.
By publishing articles and other scholarly works with law journals and other reputable publishers of legal literary works. This requires detailed legal research as such publications usually have high standards of articles being well sourced. ChatGPT will not cut it.
You can either go the normal route of being at a top law school and get in good with the woke DEI liberal professors. It helps to be gay, trans, a woman or a minority. OR, if you’re just a boring cis hetero white man, then you can join the Federalist Society. Helps if you like beer and guns. Either way, ‘legal scholars’ are pretty pathetic lot and largely irrelevant. People with the real brains go into private practice to make the big bucks, or the judiciary, or DOJ. If you earn your credentials by actually working, then you can be a talking head if you toe the line of whatever ideological bent you surround yourself by. Again, pretty pathetic. A ‘legal scholar’ is nothing a decent person would aspire to.
Omfg please explain 47:43 much slower if you have time in another episode lol no matter how many times I try to listen through this I can't seem to follow all the threads. The USA vs Miller sovreingty bankruptcy case too, same issue. 😅 Would love elaboration
No, b/c Bostock is Title VII for employment, Skrmetti is 14th Amendment. Different language, different law, different policy purpose/context. They COULD use the same reasoning as Bostock, but Bostock isn’t an applicable ‘precedent’.
The only reason they euthanized the squirrel was because it bit someone, and they needed to check if the squirrel had rabies.If the owner of the squirrel had registered it and made sure it was updated on it's vaccinations then they wouldn't have had to euthanize it. But the only way to check for rabies is taking out it's brain and checking. As a lover a squirrels I still wouldn't want to mess with rabies. They can stay outside.Or if injured taken to a wildlife rehabilitation center.
I’ve been thinking about how not legally-logical the decisions of the current Court have been. I was trying to explain why certain arguments don’t make sense, and shared this video with my teen. What if we framed more of our criticisms of these decisions based on calling out good old-fashioned logical fallacies? ua-cam.com/video/pCg-SNOteQQ/v-deo.html
help! 562 blah blah blah 888 blah blah blah 3248 blah blah blah help me please, this is an sos I am trapped I need help please please please this is not a joke
I really wish you guys wouldn’t laugh about the squirrel being killed. It’s a terrible story and like the old saying even a broken clock is right twice a day, MAGA can be too. They have so little empathy, laughing at one of the few times they do is simply not helpful. The story of the squirrel is heart breaking. The guy had filed the paper work to be allowed to have them as pets, someone online filed a complaint and they were taken. The guy told the authorities he was in the process of the licensing and they told him to call and work it out but they had to do their job. They were then immediately euthanized. The guy is broken. This is a sad story. Laughing at maga for the hell of it is not always required
I don't think the coverage is to make light of the squirrel situation. It's more to call out the hypocrisy of Maga (them focusing on small meme-fueled edge stories instead of stuff that actually matters). If they truly wanted to "Make America Great Again",. the logical thing to do would be to focus on areas of the country where the problems are the worst. They want to shut down the Dept of Education, but Red States have lowest literacy. They want to up-end the HHS and FDA and complain about Obesity, but the most obese states are Red States. They want to do mass deportations, but barring California as number-1,.. Texas and Florida are 2nd and 3rd. Red States tend to take more in Federal funding, where Blue states tend on average to contribute more. So it's just hypocrisy through and through. The squirrel meme (or the "eating cats and dogs") are just ways for them to spin up hyperbolic fear about edge cases to keep people disinformed and fearful of problems that are actually small or in some cases don't even exist.
It's a terrible story because the unqualified guy took the squirrel from the wild to keep as a pet. He was not a licensed wildlife rehabilitator so had no business taking the animal from the wild to house. It was blatantly illegal for the owner to have Peanut. The euthanasia was also completely necessary because Peanut bit someone- and it is only possible to test for rabies on an animal that is deceased. Furthermore, the MAGA people angry about this have been using their anger to send death threats and bomb threats to DEC officials, including people who had no involvement in this case- it's completely messed up to be targeting individuals who were doing their job and acting in accordance to NY state law.
A little context on the Peanut the Squirrel that a lot of people are missing. He never had the squirrel vaccinated for rabies, nor did he the raccoon. It is widely known and accepted that raccoons are vectors for rabies. He had the squirrel for 8 years and seemingly never took it to a vet OR attempted to fill the paperwork out at any time in the years prior -- all of which are completely standard practice in any rehabilitation practice and are in no way obscure or hard to find. When the authorities were on site, . When questioned whether either the squirrel or raccoon had current rabies vaccinations, the answer was "no" because *he never took them to the vet*. As is standard procedure because rabies is 100% fatal if contracted, the animals were seized, euthanized, and tested for rabies. The worker then still had to receive a series of 5 injections to prevent any possible contraction of rabies. I'll agree that it is sad that the squirrel and raccoon had to be euthanized... BUT it is more sad that their owner was too careless to take the proper steps and instead chose to exploit the animal to profit, internet fame, and to drive traffic to his OnlyFans account. It is 100% his own fault and he is trying to create a false narrative around the incident and trying to make it a "culture war" for his own profit just as he did the squirrel.
help! 562 blah blah blah 888 blah blah blah 3248 blah blah blah help me please, this is an sos I am trapped I need help please please please this is not a joke ikjd
help! 562 blah blah blah 888 blah blah blah 3248 blah blah blah help me please, this is an sos I am trapped I need help please please please this is not a joke
help! 562 blah blah blah 888 blah blah blah 3248 blah blah blah help me please, this is an sos I am trapped I need help please please please this is not a joke
We all should transition and have transsexual kids and and marry only with an transexual partner or same sex partner. And definitely not ban this gender affirming care they are protected in the constitution and in New York
i was just listening to your compatriots, sisters in law, among others expounding on what is likely in store as the landscape of our society undergoes radical revision. unbound by norms, laws, accountability and certainly not any internal moral compass; self-consciousness, shame, responsibility nor even an ability to foresee consequences. i despair. but i am truly grateful that despite no doubt busy lives, careers, and legitimate concern for your personal security, you guys continue to produce these enlightening, informative and humorous episodes...thank you
Mitch McConnell accusing others of undermining the judiciary is hilarious
Vladek is an intellectual powerhouse and national treasure. I learn so much from him, and from you. Thank you all.
You ladies are awesome, thank you for your time, knowledge, education and truth 💙💙💙
Right? It's great that they will support males lactating and breast feeding babies. We don't want sex based rights or discrimination, and we want males in all our female spaces to feel comfortable. We welcome them. We are kind, and we know they really are women. La Leche will be in court soon. Males have a right to join support group for breastfeeding mothers, and a right to have babies suckle their nipples. It is a great pleasure, and gender affirming, and we cannot deny them this euphoric experience.
RIP FRED 😭
this SCOTUS case makes me v nervous 🙃🙃🙃 I'm a gay trans man myself and I work as a therapist for primarily queer and trans youth; and I'm worried for my own healthcare, the healthcare of the kids I work with, and my ability to even do my job helping these kids. I just don't see it ending well, and I fear that any decision that hurts the trans community will further empower legislative or executive action to continue targeting the trans community 🙃🙃🙃
Nobody is being ‘targeted’. It’s about protecting children from medical experimentation and highly dubious ‘science’ in an area where minors can’t reasonably have informed consent. Destransitioners matter. Funny how the liberal media ignores them. Almost like they are in denial that detransitioners exist, because it undermines the very idea of a fixed gender identity. And if it’s not fixed, it’s not a meaningful class worthy under the 14th Amendment, as was argued in court. Strangio could not deny the basic logic that transgender identities are not necessarily fixed. Refuted.
Are they all high in the Federalist society? Jeeze…
In April 2024 the four-year, NHS England-commissioned review of pediatric gender medicine was submitted by Dr. Hilary Cass. The Cass Review has been fully accepted by the NHS, supported by the U.K. major political parties, and broadly embraced by the U.K. clinical community. As a result, the TAVISTOCK gender clinic was closed down.
And it is thoroughly fraudulent. Cherry picked data, absurd and laughable study design, many examples of direct lying in the report itself. The transphobes have no morals.
Shhhh… this is a fact-free zone. Only choir-preaching allowed here.
Leah: Lots of us do not drink coffee but would "mainline" sugar. Glad to see you are in the club. 😘
Im with the right on Peanut the Squirrel
Ah the Federalist Society ... making it extremely easy for the contrarian mediocre law student to become embedded in the Judiciary since 1982.
Yes, it is appalling that they are not anti-natalist, and we want them to call us "birthers" and "people with a uterus."
I am with you Leah on the sugar!
12/4/24 Prelogar proves beyond a reasonable doubt that SHE is a liar.
Oh what a missed opportunity for Judge Vladek to play Billy Paul singing Me and Mrs Jones. Not only would it mess with copyright playback but also slaps some levity on yet more eye-rolling discourse from the radical right.
We got a thang goin on…😂
I love that show! Ladies you are awesome!!! It feel like I’m in Dejavu from Brazil - where I used to be a lawyer . I’m sad to see all of this here and around the world, actually.
Btw, Melissa, I love your room decor 😍
Thank you for referring to Alexis Carrington Colby. The actress portraying Alexis perfectly inhabited both Lady Macbeth and a hilarious, campy send-up of the same character.😂
You question how SCOTUS can use logic to uphold a law against gender affirming care, when that logic was used to invalidate Loving v. Virginia. What makes you think they do not want to invalidate Loving?
We have sex segregation right now, in sports, locker rooms, and other female only spaces. Why allow males in female only spaces?
There was an irony in watching them consume a beverage in celebration of the weakening of regulatory agencies, some of which regulate beverages similar to the very thing they were consuming.
Leah needs to try Duplin muscadine wine. 😂
Ostensibly is my favorite word.
Unfortunately sugar can be much more harmful than caffeine and its benefits.
Bob Ross would be very sad about the squirrel.
Not Sex discrimination? Fine--- Biological discrimination!
These laws are clearly discriminatory. They simply don't care.
'bed socks senior members'😄
Dear Strict Scrutiny and Strict Scrutiny Listeners... a question that has always been on my mind: how does one become a legal scholar / top legal mind in a particular area of law? I have always just been curious on what criteria, loose or well defined, it gets based off of.
By publishing articles and other scholarly works with law journals and other reputable publishers of legal literary works. This requires detailed legal research as such publications usually have high standards of articles being well sourced. ChatGPT will not cut it.
You can either go the normal route of being at a top law school and get in good with the woke DEI liberal professors. It helps to be gay, trans, a woman or a minority. OR, if you’re just a boring cis hetero white man, then you can join the Federalist Society. Helps if you like beer and guns. Either way, ‘legal scholars’ are pretty pathetic lot and largely irrelevant. People with the real brains go into private practice to make the big bucks, or the judiciary, or DOJ. If you earn your credentials by actually working, then you can be a talking head if you toe the line of whatever ideological bent you surround yourself by. Again, pretty pathetic. A ‘legal scholar’ is nothing a decent person would aspire to.
Peanut and Fred.....(SC is falling off the bridge)
As an 80 year old, I recognized only the mitt romney reference. Please stick to the "meat" of your topic (I'm also vegan).
I love this , though the courts are depressing me with their deviant behaviour , you guys made me laugh about it.
38:40 “They would be reviving a previously rejected precedent”
SCOTUS conservative justices: Did someone say there existed a precedent?!?
I know right, like the precedent of "A Woman is an Adult Human Female." That is so passe!
Omfg please explain 47:43 much slower if you have time in another episode lol no matter how many times I try to listen through this I can't seem to follow all the threads.
The USA vs Miller sovreingty bankruptcy case too, same issue. 😅 Would love elaboration
Wasn't she already investigated for bias and misconduct? (1913)
help!
On the Skrmetti case, could the precedent in Bostock apply here?
No, b/c Bostock is Title VII for employment, Skrmetti is 14th Amendment. Different language, different law, different policy purpose/context. They COULD use the same reasoning as Bostock, but Bostock isn’t an applicable ‘precedent’.
"I am familiar with Drake"
😢😢
The only reason they euthanized the squirrel was because it bit someone, and they needed to check if the squirrel had rabies.If the owner of the squirrel had registered it and made sure it was updated on it's vaccinations then they wouldn't have had to euthanize it. But the only way to check for rabies is taking out it's brain and checking. As a lover a squirrels I still wouldn't want to mess with rabies. They can stay outside.Or if injured taken to a wildlife rehabilitation center.
We have more regulations for squirrels than we do for gender affirming care.
If i didn’t have flavored vapes, I would still be smoking.
I really thought these ladies were part of the gilded elite until the wine discussion.
The whine discussion should have given you a clue!
I’ve been thinking about how not legally-logical the decisions of the current Court have been. I was trying to explain why certain arguments don’t make sense, and shared this video with my teen. What if we framed more of our criticisms of these decisions based on calling out good old-fashioned logical fallacies?
ua-cam.com/video/pCg-SNOteQQ/v-deo.html
please please please
Judge Jones is not too young to rremember.
Why are hierarchies pro natalist? Answer further the hierarchy and inequality
help me!
Happy December all...🎉😂🤷♀️
i need your help
help!
562 blah blah blah
888 blah blah blah
3248 blah blah blah
help me please, this is an sos I am trapped I need help please please please
this is not a joke
help me
please help me
I really wish you guys wouldn’t laugh about the squirrel being killed. It’s a terrible story and like the old saying even a broken clock is right twice a day,
MAGA can be too. They have so little empathy, laughing at one of the few times they do is simply not helpful.
The story of the squirrel is heart breaking. The guy had filed the paper work to be allowed to have them as pets, someone online filed a complaint and they were taken. The guy told the authorities he was in the process of the licensing and they told him to call and work it out but they had to do their job. They were then immediately euthanized. The guy is broken. This is a sad story. Laughing at maga for the hell of it is not always required
I don't think the coverage is to make light of the squirrel situation. It's more to call out the hypocrisy of Maga (them focusing on small meme-fueled edge stories instead of stuff that actually matters). If they truly wanted to "Make America Great Again",. the logical thing to do would be to focus on areas of the country where the problems are the worst. They want to shut down the Dept of Education, but Red States have lowest literacy. They want to up-end the HHS and FDA and complain about Obesity, but the most obese states are Red States. They want to do mass deportations, but barring California as number-1,.. Texas and Florida are 2nd and 3rd. Red States tend to take more in Federal funding, where Blue states tend on average to contribute more. So it's just hypocrisy through and through. The squirrel meme (or the "eating cats and dogs") are just ways for them to spin up hyperbolic fear about edge cases to keep people disinformed and fearful of problems that are actually small or in some cases don't even exist.
It's a terrible story because the unqualified guy took the squirrel from the wild to keep as a pet. He was not a licensed wildlife rehabilitator so had no business taking the animal from the wild to house. It was blatantly illegal for the owner to have Peanut. The euthanasia was also completely necessary because Peanut bit someone- and it is only possible to test for rabies on an animal that is deceased.
Furthermore, the MAGA people angry about this have been using their anger to send death threats and bomb threats to DEC officials, including people who had no involvement in this case- it's completely messed up to be targeting individuals who were doing their job and acting in accordance to NY state law.
A little context on the Peanut the Squirrel that a lot of people are missing. He never had the squirrel vaccinated for rabies, nor did he the raccoon. It is widely known and accepted that raccoons are vectors for rabies. He had the squirrel for 8 years and seemingly never took it to a vet OR attempted to fill the paperwork out at any time in the years prior -- all of which are completely standard practice in any rehabilitation practice and are in no way obscure or hard to find. When the authorities were on site, . When questioned whether either the squirrel or raccoon had current rabies vaccinations, the answer was "no" because *he never took them to the vet*. As is standard procedure because rabies is 100% fatal if contracted, the animals were seized, euthanized, and tested for rabies. The worker then still had to receive a series of 5 injections to prevent any possible contraction of rabies.
I'll agree that it is sad that the squirrel and raccoon had to be euthanized... BUT it is more sad that their owner was too careless to take the proper steps and instead chose to exploit the animal to profit, internet fame, and to drive traffic to his OnlyFans account. It is 100% his own fault and he is trying to create a false narrative around the incident and trying to make it a "culture war" for his own profit just as he did the squirrel.
@ that’s fine, it’s still not something to have belly laughs over as they’ve done on two shows.
help!
562 blah blah blah
888 blah blah blah
3248 blah blah blah
help me please, this is an sos I am trapped I need help please please please
this is not a joke ikjd
40:07 Puppy!
help me!
help!
562 blah blah blah
888 blah blah blah
3248 blah blah blah
help me please, this is an sos I am trapped I need help please please please
this is not a joke
help me!
help!
562 blah blah blah
888 blah blah blah
3248 blah blah blah
help me please, this is an sos I am trapped I need help please please please
this is not a joke
help me!