2005 Raiders at Patriots Week 1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 46

  • @chrisuncleahmad666
    @chrisuncleahmad666 3 роки тому +12

    2005, the end of an era in the NFL
    Last year of ABC MNF, ESPN SNF, only two Thanksgiving Games, and no more AstroTurf (all dome teams now have fieldturf)

    • @scottgreenberg1596
      @scottgreenberg1596 3 роки тому +5

      Last year of regular NFL Primetime too.

    • @Dud512
      @Dud512 3 роки тому +1

      I miss MNF on ABC

    • @finchborat
      @finchborat 3 роки тому +5

      @@Dud512 At least they opted to simulcast the Wildcard game on both ESPN and ABC. I always watch on ABC for the nostalgia.
      I'm also glad they simulcast an MNF game every now and then. I wish they did more.

    • @finchborat
      @finchborat 3 роки тому

      2005 was also the last year of ABC Sports.

    • @astrostar49
      @astrostar49 3 роки тому +3

      Last year of my key wheelhouse of 1979 to 2005. After that the sport just hasn't been as good in my mind.

  • @marcusmcgraw3519
    @marcusmcgraw3519 3 роки тому +9

    This was such an interesting MNF scoreboard. Most people forget about it since it only lasted 1 season

  • @jcarreon1983jc
    @jcarreon1983jc 3 роки тому +10

    This is it for ABC.

  • @JahNuhThunDeeTheOneAndOnly
    @JahNuhThunDeeTheOneAndOnly 3 роки тому +11

    Randy Moss, welcome to the Raiders.
    You’re already playing against the next team you’ll be on.

    • @tylerm5774
      @tylerm5774 3 роки тому +1

      Such a beast. Should have went to a contender.

    • @californiaman4000
      @californiaman4000 3 роки тому +3

      Why'd Randy Moss leave Minnesota in the first place?

    • @ManiaxOnYT
      @ManiaxOnYT 3 роки тому +3

      @@californiaman4000 He was traded I think

    • @chrisuncleahmad666
      @chrisuncleahmad666 3 роки тому +5

      @@californiaman4000 he didn't sign as a free agent. vikings traded him.

  • @californiaman4000
    @californiaman4000 3 роки тому +11

    Life without Rich Gannon.

    • @JahNuhThunDeeTheOneAndOnly
      @JahNuhThunDeeTheOneAndOnly 3 роки тому +4

      Well the Raiders got to enjoy life without him the past two seasons for the most part due to age and injuries

  • @chrisuncleahmad666
    @chrisuncleahmad666 3 роки тому +7

    Oakland played better than most expected but still an inevitabile outcome
    They have an absolutely brutal September schedule- Pats here, Chiefs next week, and at Philly

    • @JahNuhThunDeeTheOneAndOnly
      @JahNuhThunDeeTheOneAndOnly 3 роки тому +3

      But at least they have Randy Moss this time, right?

    • @chrisuncleahmad666
      @chrisuncleahmad666 3 роки тому +4

      @@JahNuhThunDeeTheOneAndOnly OAK was sneaky compeititive in most of their games from November onwards last year. They can't do any worse with Moss

    • @AmirKhan-yv8jm
      @AmirKhan-yv8jm 6 місяців тому +1

      @@chrisuncleahmad666yea no way they go winless in their division ! 😂

  • @Mark-xl1ze
    @Mark-xl1ze 3 роки тому +9

    MNF hasn't been the same since ABC dropped it in favor of their little brother, ESPN.

  • @JahNuhThunDeeTheOneAndOnly
    @JahNuhThunDeeTheOneAndOnly 3 роки тому +6

    How odd was it that the two-time defending champions were hosting a last place team from the year before to start the season, in primetime no less?

    • @xboxgamer5258
      @xboxgamer5258 3 роки тому +3

      Why did they even choose the Raiders? When they could have chosen the Chargers, maybe Colts again, Jets based off their 2004 Season

    • @chrisuncleahmad666
      @chrisuncleahmad666 3 роки тому +6

      Patriots had more marquee games on the road (at PIT, DEN, KC, ATL, CAR) than at home
      They were not going to do a Colts rematch on opening Thursday night. Only other option would have been the Chargers and CBS wanted that

    • @TB-vz8xg
      @TB-vz8xg 3 роки тому +7

      They probably didn't want the Colts two straight years. It should have been the Chargers, but I guess the Randy Moss Raiders created more drama.

    • @chrisuncleahmad666
      @chrisuncleahmad666 3 роки тому +4

      @@TB-vz8xg CBS wanted that SD game

    • @finchborat
      @finchborat 3 роки тому +4

      I think it was because this was the first meeting between the 2 in Foxboro since the Tuck Rule game. That was the game that launched the dynasty.

  • @KyleCaughlin
    @KyleCaughlin 3 роки тому +5

    At least this time there was no controversy in New England for the Raiders. They flat out loss.

  • @SMP1993
    @SMP1993 3 роки тому +9

    Randy Moss showing Oakland he’s going to be worth every asset and penny spent on him. Surely that continues……

  • @TB-vz8xg
    @TB-vz8xg 3 роки тому +7

    The Patriots quest for the NFL's first threepeat since the Lombardi Packers begins. However they now have two new Coordinators, an aging roster, and a brutal schedule.

    • @AmirKhan-yv8jm
      @AmirKhan-yv8jm 3 місяці тому

      It was not meant to be, no team will ever 3 peat SBs!

  • @Dud512
    @Dud512 3 роки тому +4

    Randy Moss playing his future team

  • @chrisuncleahmad666
    @chrisuncleahmad666 3 роки тому +3

    Pats just keep on keeping on
    But New England has a ROUGH schedule on deck looming- at Carolina, at Pittsburgh, home for San Diego, at Falcons, at Broncos
    Their next easy game- October 30th vs post-Bledsoe Buffalo .

  • @chrisuncleahmad666
    @chrisuncleahmad666 3 роки тому +4

    Not an instant classic Patriots primetime opened ala last year vs the Colts nor a blowout like September 2002 vs Pittsburgh
    Still a decent game

    • @finchborat
      @finchborat 3 роки тому +4

      It was more competitive than expected. Maybe the Raiders will get over the 2 yr slump with Moss in the mix.

  • @rollinstonemoula9689
    @rollinstonemoula9689 Рік тому

    Lamount Jordan sound like he was callin tha Pats Cheaters 😎😂😂😂✌✊

  • @chrisuncleahmad666
    @chrisuncleahmad666 3 роки тому +4

    So does anyone think New England can win 3 straight SB’s?

  • @arodgefan589
    @arodgefan589 3 роки тому +5

    New England wasn't that sharp in 2005. 10-6 is fine, but after 2 straight years of going 14-2?

    • @chrisuncleahmad666
      @chrisuncleahmad666 3 роки тому +8

      Injuries and a brutal schedule. That and the pressure of trying to threepeat

    • @playoffexpert3938
      @playoffexpert3938 3 роки тому +3

      Their depth seems kinda weak for some reason

    • @NYG5
      @NYG5 3 роки тому +4

      @@playoffexpert3938 they're a rapidly aging team

    • @playoffexpert3938
      @playoffexpert3938 2 роки тому +1

      @@BillyBob-ti2fz at least the receiving core was better than the next year’s.

    • @AmirKhan-yv8jm
      @AmirKhan-yv8jm 3 місяці тому

      Post SB hangover! They went 16-0 only 2 years later.

  • @Dud512
    @Dud512 3 роки тому +4

    Richard Seymour playing his future team