He mostly was hated when his actions helped team Harvey and loved when it helped team Harvey,he never did anything that surprised all of us, including the characters.
Harvey, Donna, and Lewis needed to take more responsibility for their role. Despite always calling the firm their "family," it must have been a slap in the face to spend years in law school and investing time/money in the firm, only to be working with a disbarred name partner and a fraud. The trust they built with clients, their reputation, their hard work is all gone. Harvey calling it "his firm" proves how removed he is from his colleagues and from his role in their predicament.
About those partners, let's make sure we have the opposite side clear. Harvey had Jessica waive their noncompetes to see how far their camaraderie, their sense of family as a firm, went. From top to bottom, the answer was "jackshit." To Harvey, it is his, and maybe Louis's and Donna's firm, because they're the only ones who fought for it. And at least with the new generation, he was taking responsibility. Alex Williams, he fought to protect him, and I'm willing to bet at this point in the story if Katrina was in trouble he wouldn't hesitate either.
I like jack soloff, he say to Mike he has being working hard for twenty years, and everything comes so easy to Harvey he say. Remember when Louis went to Benjamin, about looking for all information on Jack soloff. He was going through the memory stick, he was getting mad because he couldn't find one thing he had done wrong. He didn't get fair chance, he was nice to Mike, when Mike came to see him about Harvey and fortsman, jack was being nice, giving Mike friendly advice, and Mike wasn't one bit nice to him. I like his scene in season six he comes honestly to Robert Zane, with his cap in hand, to tell him, he doesn't have the money for the buy in.
It just became unbelievable. The show started to die when Mike went to prison because it could never realistically be explained. Then it just turned into more of the same. Pearson Specter Litt Whatever got sued more times than their clients.
@@RylanStorm very true plus the whole allure was Mike getting away with the lie.. when that burst they should of been creative enough to shut the show down with dignity but they went as far as to make Donna the COO..yeassshh!
This episode was the perfect one for the writers to have put Jack on the show for the rest of it as a team member. He was a great character and the actor was believable.
one thing about harvey is he might do some bad stuff to win but at the end of the day you dont wanna go up against him if you mess with someone or somethnig he cares about
For all of the talk about "Best Closer in the City", we never see a single instance of Harvey's supposed "Brilliance". He has never really displayed any great legal acumen. When we do see him win cases, it's mostly because the script says so, and because he is saved by some ridiculous ex-machina. He's typically petulant, childish, and usually starts screaming and yelling when things aren't going his way, like he does here with Louis. As much as I do like this show, and usually like his character, it's annoying that they constantly show him to be incompetent, while TELLING us he's brilliant.
If you recall,from season one,when Jessica went to the person who gave her the role to run Pearson hardmen at the time,she said he didn’t care about his employee’s and that he could betray her,the whole point of this show was to make him care and not do certain things to win.
@@PabloEscobar-yd8yc I appreciate that, but again, they tell us and not show us. We definitely see that he's a caring guy, but we also see that he does those "certain things". That's actually one of the funniest things about this series. We are all squarely behind the main characters, yet every antagonist that ever comes up through the whole series is actually right. They do commit fraud at this firm on a grand level. We never want them to get caught, but they are actually the ones breaking the law all of the time.
@TonyPerez It was the same repetitive theme every episode. First they will be trailing and then out of nowhere Mike or harvey found weakness to bend the opposition their way
Wrong, 1st episode ( the abuse case ), Episode 5 ( patent issue ), Epi 6 ( motors ). And a lot of episodes he uses his experience to make a way to the solution. On real world, the loyer gonna sit, study, find a way... But harvey not just know the nature of the issue, but he knows strings to pull. And i dont need to remind you that " don't play the game, play the man "... Mike Ross with his skill in other hand is what you said about Ex-machina or script thing.. And when Harvey turn it in tactics make very realistic.
For some reason I can't stop watching this show. But then again the files fly like back to the world. And I just can't understand why cuz there's no insects in the room
Replay from first scene and follow how fast the old white beard partner is speaking It's like they didnt give him space to breath, to fit the storyline in the limited time.
This doesn't make any sense. Of course, the suit is for recovering their buy-in amount. How does validating your opponent's claim lead to the dismissal of their suit? On the contrary, it actually strengthens their case...
Because they're pretending it's for something else. I don't know much about the law, but I imagine you can sue for one thing, while secretly trying to get something else out of it.
Because when they left to go somewhere else, they forfeited their buy-in, now they're looking for a reason to scoop the money back despite having no legit claim other then "you threw Jessica under the bus". For them, they think itll be easy money and remove competition at the same time.
Soloff was a great character. Complex and conflicted. Sometimes you hated him, sometimes you wanted to see him succeed.
He went after Jessica, but he was also the one who did what no one else could; make Mike Ross a Junior Partner
couldn't agree more
Helps add to the story when non villain antagonists make the protags work extra hard
He mostly was hated when his actions helped team Harvey and loved when it helped team Harvey,he never did anything that surprised all of us, including the characters.
We should have seen more of him
Harvey, Donna, and Lewis needed to take more responsibility for their role. Despite always calling the firm their "family," it must have been a slap in the face to spend years in law school and investing time/money in the firm, only to be working with a disbarred name partner and a fraud. The trust they built with clients, their reputation, their hard work is all gone. Harvey calling it "his firm" proves how removed he is from his colleagues and from his role in their predicament.
About those partners, let's make sure we have the opposite side clear. Harvey had Jessica waive their noncompetes to see how far their camaraderie, their sense of family as a firm, went. From top to bottom, the answer was "jackshit." To Harvey, it is his, and maybe Louis's and Donna's firm, because they're the only ones who fought for it.
And at least with the new generation, he was taking responsibility. Alex Williams, he fought to protect him, and I'm willing to bet at this point in the story if Katrina was in trouble he wouldn't hesitate either.
I like jack soloff, he say to Mike he has being working hard for twenty years, and everything comes so easy to Harvey he say. Remember when Louis went to Benjamin, about looking for all information on Jack soloff. He was going through the memory stick, he was getting mad because he couldn't find one thing he had done wrong. He didn't get fair chance, he was nice to Mike, when Mike came to see him about Harvey and fortsman, jack was being nice, giving Mike friendly advice, and Mike wasn't one bit nice to him. I like his scene in season six he comes honestly to Robert Zane, with his cap in hand, to tell him, he doesn't have the money for the buy in.
i wish soloff never left the firm
Great season I say 👏 bravo. Harvey being a boss as per usual.
Never get tired of these. Shame it didn't continue
Gotta admit it got really bad in the end. Missed the first few seasons though
Meghan went from destroying Suits to destroying a monarchy 🙊
@@bllardw says the man with lard in his username
It just became unbelievable.
The show started to die when Mike went to prison because it could never realistically be explained.
Then it just turned into more of the same. Pearson Specter Litt Whatever got sued more times than their clients.
@@RylanStorm very true plus the whole allure was Mike getting away with the lie.. when that burst they should of been creative enough to shut the show down with dignity but they went as far as to make Donna the COO..yeassshh!
0:53 I love when they get together to take down Cousin Stanley.
Seems like with this show that lawyers are suing lawyers lol 😆
are these supposed to be lawyers? or children?
They fail at both
Jobs: There is an app for that ...
Suits: There is a lawsuit for that ...
how to make this more dramatic? let's make characters go see each other after every single development and passionately argue
This episode was the perfect one for the writers to have put Jack on the show for the rest of it as a team member. He was a great character and the actor was believable.
Harvey is so arrogant that I wanna fire him
There should be a spinoff of Jack
one thing about harvey is he might do some bad stuff to win but at the end of the day you dont wanna go up against him if you mess with someone or somethnig he cares about
Mayor Teale?
For all of the talk about "Best Closer in the City", we never see a single instance of Harvey's supposed "Brilliance". He has never really displayed any great legal acumen. When we do see him win cases, it's mostly because the script says so, and because he is saved by some ridiculous ex-machina. He's typically petulant, childish, and usually starts screaming and yelling when things aren't going his way, like he does here with Louis. As much as I do like this show, and usually like his character, it's annoying that they constantly show him to be incompetent, while TELLING us he's brilliant.
I agree but to be fair, it would be boring af if he wins all the cases cause of brilliance.
If you recall,from season one,when Jessica went to the person who gave her the role to run Pearson hardmen at the time,she said he didn’t care about his employee’s and that he could betray her,the whole point of this show was to make him care and not do certain things to win.
@@PabloEscobar-yd8yc I appreciate that, but again, they tell us and not show us. We definitely see that he's a caring guy, but we also see that he does those "certain things". That's actually one of the funniest things about this series. We are all squarely behind the main characters, yet every antagonist that ever comes up through the whole series is actually right. They do commit fraud at this firm on a grand level. We never want them to get caught, but they are actually the ones breaking the law all of the time.
@TonyPerez It was the same repetitive theme every episode. First they will be trailing and then out of nowhere Mike or harvey found weakness to bend the opposition their way
Wrong, 1st episode ( the abuse case ), Episode 5 ( patent issue ), Epi 6 ( motors ). And a lot of episodes he uses his experience to make a way to the solution. On real world, the loyer gonna sit, study, find a way... But harvey not just know the nature of the issue, but he knows strings to pull. And i dont need to remind you that " don't play the game, play the man "... Mike Ross with his skill in other hand is what you said about Ex-machina or script thing.. And when Harvey turn it in tactics make very realistic.
If I was a partner I'd want my money back too
For some reason I can't stop watching this show. But then again the files fly like back to the world. And I just can't understand why cuz there's no insects in the room
Replay from first scene and follow how fast the old white beard partner is speaking
It's like they didnt give him space to breath, to fit the storyline in the limited time.
This doesn't make any sense. Of course, the suit is for recovering their buy-in amount. How does validating your opponent's claim lead to the dismissal of their suit? On the contrary, it actually strengthens their case...
Because they're pretending it's for something else. I don't know much about the law, but I imagine you can sue for one thing, while secretly trying to get something else out of it.
Because when they left to go somewhere else, they forfeited their buy-in, now they're looking for a reason to scoop the money back despite having no legit claim other then "you threw Jessica under the bus".
For them, they think itll be easy money and remove competition at the same time.
The censored "son of a " and left out BS. Smh!