Why Don't The Channel Islands Belong to France?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 549

  • @mbd501
    @mbd501 15 днів тому +167

    Ironically, France still owns some islands off the coast of Canada, but the British Crown still owns these islands off the coast of France.

    • @noelgenoway9360
      @noelgenoway9360 15 днів тому +18

      Saint Pierre and Miquelon should be part of Canada and not France!!!

    • @lokensicarius9347
      @lokensicarius9347 14 днів тому +20

      @@noelgenoway9360 and Canada should belong to the US!!!

    • @goatuy
      @goatuy 14 днів тому +40

      @@lokensicarius9347 And the US should belong to Britain!!!

    • @lokensicarius9347
      @lokensicarius9347 14 днів тому +5

      @goatuy *I AGREEEE!!!!!!!!!!!*

    • @stanley5543
      @stanley5543 14 днів тому +13

      @goatuy US should belong to native american.

  • @derecklelliott3271
    @derecklelliott3271 13 днів тому +67

    As a Jersey man, I am proud to be British and know the history of my home, we have forts and had our own army to see the French off .. the battle of Jersey 🇯🇪 is also something to be proud of, yes, the Jersey 🇯🇪 flight went around the world 🌎 not only that we Boult sail ships for the British navy! .. Jersey has a good history, and I am proud to be British

    • @blueballbag3588
      @blueballbag3588 13 днів тому +6

      Proud partnership with our Jersey friends!

    • @ianbaker8225
      @ianbaker8225 12 днів тому +2

      You'll always be British,my friend. 🇬🇧

    • @leebrown4049
      @leebrown4049 11 днів тому

      My Nanna was from St Helier, she was evacuated to The North of England, she lived here until her death.

    • @semensimon1266
      @semensimon1266 10 днів тому

      @@derecklelliott3271 good for you! And Brits are very proud of our strong partnership throughout history 🇬🇧

    • @allanmatch6858
      @allanmatch6858 8 днів тому

      @@derecklelliott3271 les vrais jersiens parlent coûtencais

  • @johnrenouf5739
    @johnrenouf5739 14 днів тому +22

    The Channel Island are NOT part of the UK. They are independent Crown Dependencies of the English Crown … to this day

  • @curiosityofpod
    @curiosityofpod 15 днів тому +93

    Hi from Guernsey!

    • @lasakau272
      @lasakau272 15 днів тому

      @GARTEN-KATZEN-SACHSENLANDwho are the invaders?

    • @Baddy187
      @Baddy187 15 днів тому

      ​@@lasakau272Muslims, duh.

    • @XennialTV
      @XennialTV 15 днів тому

      @GARTEN-KATZEN-SACHSENLAND They speak French in the Channel Islands.

    • @keatonarcher1071
      @keatonarcher1071 15 днів тому +2

      Haha same here

    • @tudung348
      @tudung348 15 днів тому

      ​@GARTEN-KATZEN-SACHSENLAND lmao, they were never a part of the Kingdom of England. They're initially part of a French fief held by the English king. Even until now, it has no representation in England.

  • @Waterford1992
    @Waterford1992 15 днів тому +80

    Very first thing that was said was completely wrong as the Channel islands are not part of the UK but are crown dependencies.

    • @ura9390
      @ura9390 13 днів тому +10

      Yes AI generated content, AI doesn’t understand subtleties

    • @blueballbag3588
      @blueballbag3588 13 днів тому +2

      AI

    • @edwardwilcox8982
      @edwardwilcox8982 12 днів тому +1

      The first that was said wrongly was the date of the invasion. The invasion of England was in 1066. Utter......

    • @deldia
      @deldia 11 днів тому +3

      That's more a matter of context. In everyday life, they are not considered part of the UK, but it depends how you want to define things. If you want a specific answer on something, you need an authority. The recognised authority on sovereignty in the world is generally the United Nations and I guarantee they would say the channel islands are sovereign territory of the United Kingdom and ultimate (and I mean ultimate) control in law does lie with the UK.

    • @networkcobbler
      @networkcobbler 11 днів тому +2

      @@deldia Yes they are sovereign territories of the UK but they are not part of the UK. There is a distinction under UK law, and they were not included in the acts that created the UK. They have their own parliaments and laws. Nor are places such as Gibraltar, etc.

  • @geistlos333
    @geistlos333 15 днів тому +88

    5:45 - the Huguenots were not fleeing "prosecution" they were fleeing "persecution" -.

    • @geoms6263
      @geoms6263 15 днів тому +2

      prosecco-tion

    • @ura9390
      @ura9390 15 днів тому +5

      AI rubbish

    • @aravindk.s2330
      @aravindk.s2330 15 днів тому +7

      He also said continent instead of contingent

    • @etherospike3936
      @etherospike3936 15 днів тому +2

      Many of the Huguenots ended up in South Africa, where they have been assimilated in the Afrikaans culture.The most well known of them being Charlize Theron.

    • @semensimon1266
      @semensimon1266 15 днів тому

      Its because the channel is AI, it cannot read

  • @GaryJohnWalker1
    @GaryJohnWalker1 15 днів тому +63

    The occupation by Germany during WW2 was barely mentioned - a lot of info skipped that would've been interesting as the only part of 'Britain' to be so occupied

    • @DT-wp4hk
      @DT-wp4hk 15 днів тому +3

      They build famous things there😊

    • @oml81mm
      @oml81mm 15 днів тому +2

      The Channel Islands were never part of 'Britain' and are still not.

    • @mattjames88
      @mattjames88 13 днів тому

      Another mother's son - great film

    • @alexone8338
      @alexone8338 13 днів тому +2

      This video is about the Channel Islands and their relationship with France (as you can see in the title), not about the Channel Islands in general.
      I agree it would have been interesting, though.

    • @SirZanZa
      @SirZanZa 10 днів тому

      @@oml81mm They are part of the British isles. its a geographical term not a political one. they are British but they are not part of Great Britain. but collectively together with Ireland the isle of mann and many Scottish islands form part of the British isles.

  • @The_Devotee
    @The_Devotee 15 днів тому +101

    Title Typo! Shouldn't it be "Channel Islands"?

    • @travelingman2452
      @travelingman2452 15 днів тому +10

      Quite a few little mistakes like that in this video think it needed checked a bit longer before release.

    • @kobebrooks3179
      @kobebrooks3179 15 днів тому +7

      It says it now, what did it say before?

    • @raymondyu412
      @raymondyu412 15 днів тому +20

      Chanel Islands. The birth place of luxury bags and perfume!

    • @PhansiKhongoloza
      @PhansiKhongoloza 15 днів тому +4

      ​@@raymondyu412😂😂😂

    • @The_Devotee
      @The_Devotee 15 днів тому

      @@kobebrooks3179 "Why Don't The Channel Island Belong to France?"

  • @helloworld0911
    @helloworld0911 14 днів тому +8

    I think you'll find the Channel Islands aren't part of the UK, but Crown Dependencies.

  • @Ygddhgrd
    @Ygddhgrd 15 днів тому +17

    For all the Americans asking about corn not being in Europe at this time, the word corn in Britain is used as a general term for all cereal grains, especially wheat.

    • @oml81mm
      @oml81mm 15 днів тому +4

      Correct, American 'corn' is actually maize.

    • @ChristopherSobieniak
      @ChristopherSobieniak 15 днів тому

      ​@@oml81mmWe should just call it maize and leave it there.

    • @MichaelScheele
      @MichaelScheele 15 днів тому

      I remember learning about the British Corn laws of the 19th century in my European history class in high school. I was therefore not fazed by the usage in the video.
      Is the usage of "corn" as a generic term for grains fading away in the UK? Or is "maize" used instead?

    • @oml81mm
      @oml81mm 15 днів тому

      @MichaelScheele In the UK maize is known as maize (not corn).
      When corn is used it generally refers to wheat. It is, again generally, not usually used as a generic for all grains.

    • @MichaelScheele
      @MichaelScheele 15 днів тому

      @@oml81mm, is there an aversion to using "wheat?"

  • @thegoon33
    @thegoon33 13 днів тому +4

    I love how the channel islands keep their Scandinavian names from the Norman period: Geirrs Island (Jersey), Grons Island (Guernsey), Sekr (Sark) and Alda's Island (Alderney)

  • @8thLegio
    @8thLegio 15 днів тому +108

    Because some people are strong enough to choose to not be French.

    • @DT-wp4hk
      @DT-wp4hk 15 днів тому +13

      Like the Africans and Arabs arriving in England?

    • @the0ne809
      @the0ne809 15 днів тому +11

      @@DT-wp4hk you are in the wrong website. this is not 4chan or twitter.

    • @jomas07
      @jomas07 15 днів тому +4

      Sure, they chose it while being backed by English cannons.

    • @DT-wp4hk
      @DT-wp4hk 15 днів тому +1

      @@the0ne809 lol. Can't cope with it?

    • @the0ne809
      @the0ne809 14 днів тому

      @@DT-wp4hk there's nothing to cope for. just pointing out the obvious. lol

  • @benleno
    @benleno 15 днів тому +9

    They are not part of the UK. However, they are British.

  • @semensimon1266
    @semensimon1266 15 днів тому +16

    My goodness, the AI and errors are really awful in this upload.

    • @ura9390
      @ura9390 13 днів тому +3

      Yes the quality is disappointing, clearly not well researched

    • @blueballbag3588
      @blueballbag3588 13 днів тому +1

      Sadly true!

    • @SeverityOne
      @SeverityOne 12 днів тому +2

      I managed six seconds.

    • @SeverityOne
      @SeverityOne 12 днів тому

      @@ura9390 You're assuming that it was researched by a human, and not written by an AI.

    • @ura9390
      @ura9390 12 днів тому +2

      @@SeverityOne I'm not assuming anything. It is full of factual errors and presents them as gospel. The very first sentence is completely false! The Channel Islands are not part of the UK, that alone shows it has not been well researched.

  • @richardcrowell284
    @richardcrowell284 9 днів тому +1

    Both my parents were Jersey born, Dad's parents are mainly Jersey with a bit of Guernsey (most of the ancestors go back to Cornwall) mixed in. Mums parents were French her Father from Normandy and her Mother from Brittany. I lived in Jersey from the age of six months old to the age of six.

  • @od5699
    @od5699 6 днів тому +1

    Nobody owns land but a title gives an impression for a bully brigade to uphold, for a while.

  • @Lingist081
    @Lingist081 15 днів тому +32

    France didn’t own Brittany until the 1500s

    • @thehum1000
      @thehum1000 13 днів тому +1

      England should claim back northern france to protect its boarders

    • @philhawley1219
      @philhawley1219 11 днів тому

      @@thehum1000 Borders.

  • @dantetre
    @dantetre 15 днів тому +31

    3:12 in 1338 how can they burn the corn crop?!
    Corn was brought in to Europe almost 200 years later...

    • @dave1994jones
      @dave1994jones 15 днів тому +7

      Probably meant wheat

    • @Granbalam
      @Granbalam 15 днів тому +11

      Maybe it is an error taken from sources, as "corn" was also used to refer to grains in general.

    • @uncleelias
      @uncleelias 15 днів тому +8

      Maize was called corn because corn is the traditional word for a head of wheat and barley grain. Because maize became so popular amongst the English colonists in North America the English speaking "Americans" called it corn and the word stuck and the use of maize became less popular. Maize is still the word of choice in Latin America.

    • @thostaylor
      @thostaylor 15 днів тому +7

      ​@@Granbalam It's no error. As you said, in British English 'corn' refers to all grain.

    • @Ygddhgrd
      @Ygddhgrd 15 днів тому +6

      Wheat is called corn in parts of the Britain/corn is used as general term for all cereals. They're not referring to the american vegetable plant.

  • @globalflow8
    @globalflow8 15 днів тому +3

    Cool video! I never knew the Channel Islands were so interesting. Thanks for posting this!"

  • @leohorstmeier
    @leohorstmeier 15 днів тому +25

    The opening line contains an error. The Channel Islands are not part of the UK.

    • @iandodds3218
      @iandodds3218 15 днів тому +7

      ​@GARTEN-KATZEN-SACHSENLANDthey are crown possessions like the isle of man is they are independent of the UK

    • @Criispy___
      @Criispy___ 15 днів тому +4

      ​@GARTEN-KATZEN-SACHSENLAND it's a dependency, not part of the UK. If you were a "real English patriot" like you claimed, you would know this.

    • @ura9390
      @ura9390 15 днів тому +4

      Crown dependencies. This video is full of errors

    • @abobfunk
      @abobfunk 15 днів тому +1

      Also don't know about corn crop in 1300s Europe. Thought corn was new world only

    • @ura9390
      @ura9390 15 днів тому +1

      @@abobfunk “knowledge” vid called England “Britain” during the war of the roses

  • @30yearsagonow
    @30yearsagonow 15 днів тому +5

    The idea of a local militia rallying 3,000 men in 24 hours during the Napoleonic era shows just how determined and organized the Islanders were.

    • @McKeeNJackson
      @McKeeNJackson 11 днів тому

      Or how lame n weak France is and always has been.

  • @firstlas9647
    @firstlas9647 15 днів тому +4

    You're here for the explanation:
    "The Channel Islands became English possessions when William the Conqueror crossed the channel to invade England. Subsequent wars and marriages resulted in the Crown of England owning huge swathes of France - English King Henry II in the 12th Century ruled right the way to the French border with what later became Spain."

    • @leenorman853
      @leenorman853 10 днів тому

      That's ridiculous! They were part of the Duchy of Normandy long before William became King of England! Technically, England is a dependency of the Duchy of Normandy (the islands are all that's left of it). And "English" King Henry II spoke Norman French.

  • @mrglayden1690
    @mrglayden1690 3 дні тому

    Good to see my islands get recognised in a full video by a big channel instead of the sometimes sidenote, even better to see a lot of the names getting pronounced correctly

    • @Knowledgia
      @Knowledgia  3 дні тому

      Thanks for the appreciation!

  • @SuperSagittaria
    @SuperSagittaria 15 днів тому +40

    The opening line is incorrect, the Channel Islands are definitely not part of the United Kingdom. They’re part of the British Isles and share the same head of state as the United Kingdom but they’re self-governing

    • @tonylove4800
      @tonylove4800 15 днів тому +5

      The UK is responsible for defence and international relations.

    • @semensimon1266
      @semensimon1266 15 днів тому +1

      Yes AI dumbs things down a bit and therefore gets it wrong

    • @mikeainsworth4504
      @mikeainsworth4504 14 днів тому

      Yes they are Crown Dependencies (as is the Isle of Man); but, not part of the United Kingdom.

    • @GroteGeer
      @GroteGeer 14 днів тому

      Which currency are they using?

    • @PatrickCotter-lv7zb
      @PatrickCotter-lv7zb 14 днів тому +1

      There’s no such thing as the British Isles

  • @brIceni-x4w
    @brIceni-x4w 15 днів тому +10

    As an Englishman , it's a part of our history that's never occurred to me to look into, so tanks for putting this out. Very informative. Please do note though that Huguenot is pronounced Hugen-oh. The T is silent.

    • @ThierryDixon
      @ThierryDixon 14 днів тому +2

      As a Frenchman I appreciate the silent T ❤

    • @liveinhope
      @liveinhope 12 днів тому

      This so wrong youve learned nothing

  • @edmundprice5276
    @edmundprice5276 7 днів тому +1

    1:00 Duchy is not spelled with a T

  • @loneprimate
    @loneprimate 15 днів тому +10

    The Channel Islands are not part of the UK. They don't have representation in Parliament. They share the same monarch and Britain de facto looks after some of their international affairs.

    • @GroteGeer
      @GroteGeer 14 днів тому

      but dependent on the British army for its defense.

    • @AppNetEnt
      @AppNetEnt 14 днів тому

      @@GroteGeerirrelevant. They are literally not part of the UK.

    • @JohnGeorgeBauerBuis
      @JohnGeorgeBauerBuis 14 днів тому

      Basically a colony.

    • @AppNetEnt
      @AppNetEnt 14 днів тому

      @@JohnGeorgeBauerBuis nope. A colony has a very specific legal status, subservient in every way with absolutely no local authority to rule.
      The Jersey and Guernsey are effectively two separate countries, the sovereign of the UK is also head of state for both. They have full self rule with their own parliaments but have no individual representation in foreign affairs.
      The UK has no legal authority over the islands - they have no representation in the UK parliament as they are totally separate jurisdictions.
      Think of the UK, Guernsey, Jersey and the Isle of Man as sister countries. None are subservient over any of the others but the UK is big sister looking after the others’ welfare.

  • @andrewnelson4057
    @andrewnelson4057 13 днів тому +6

    They are NOT part of the UK.

  • @HughSheehy
    @HughSheehy 14 днів тому +6

    The islands are not part of the UK.
    They are "Crown Dependencies", and are part of the British Isles. They are not in the UK.
    They're also a nice illustration that the term "British Isles" is a political term. Which also illustrates that Ireland is not in the British isles. Not any more.

    • @BenDavies-on4hr
      @BenDavies-on4hr 13 днів тому +2

      British isles is a geographical name, I believe Ireland is part of the British Isles which is an Archipelago in North West Europe

    • @ura9390
      @ura9390 13 днів тому +2

      British Isles is geographical not political, it’s literally the islands off the continent loosely surrounding the island of Great Britain which includes Ireland which obviously isn’t politically British

    • @PatrickCotter-lv7zb
      @PatrickCotter-lv7zb 12 днів тому +1

      @@ura9390 The ‘British Isles’ is an imperialist construct and deeply offensive.

    • @ura9390
      @ura9390 12 днів тому

      @ no it isn’t, look it up. It is a geographical term, google it and see endless definitions that are nothing to do with your misconceptions

    • @blueballbag3588
      @blueballbag3588 10 днів тому

      @@PatrickCotter-lv7zb British Isles is not offensive. Thats the name of the Islands in that region centred around the biggest one, Great Britain

  • @AppNetEnt
    @AppNetEnt 14 днів тому +4

    I stopped watching after one minute after you said the Channel Islands are part of the UK. They are not.

  • @thehum1000
    @thehum1000 13 днів тому +2

    Northern france should all be given back to England as written in the old charter.

    • @tibsky1396
      @tibsky1396 10 днів тому +1

      You have to stop taking drugs, my friend.

  • @boulevard14
    @boulevard14 15 днів тому +8

    A lot of incorrect information here.

  • @RandallWest-g9u
    @RandallWest-g9u 15 днів тому

    Islands are fascinating features of world geography, scattered across oceans and seas. They come in various shapes and sizes, from tiny islets to large landmasses like Greenland. Some islands were formed by volcanic activity, while others emerged due to rising sea levels. Exploring the diverse types of islands in world geography reveals not only their unique landscapes but also the cultures and ecosystems they sustain.

  • @philippekogler
    @philippekogler 14 днів тому +4

    The Channel Islands belong to the Crown and are not part of the UK.

    • @leenorman853
      @leenorman853 10 днів тому

      That would be the tail wagging the dog. The islands are all that's left of the Duchy of Normandy, which (technically) has owned England since 1066.

  • @lerneanlion
    @lerneanlion 15 днів тому +2

    So the reason why Napoleon ultimately decided not to invade the Channel Islands is because it will be such a predictable move due to the fact that British heavily fortified it and even reinforced it? Am I correct with that in a sense?

  • @MrAsullivan12
    @MrAsullivan12 15 днів тому +16

    That grammar isn’t grammaring

  • @Mejox
    @Mejox 13 днів тому +2

    They are not "part of the UK", as you state after 3 seconds, switched off.

  • @beepboop204
    @beepboop204 11 днів тому

    as a Canadian, we love us some Maj. Gen. Sir Isaac Brock, and he was born in Guernsey

  • @robertbodell55
    @robertbodell55 15 днів тому +1

    5:11 the image for king Henry VII is one of King Henry II

  • @SantaFe19484
    @SantaFe19484 5 днів тому

    The island of Jersey is what New Jersey is named after, so there is a connection between the aforementioned state and the jersey that you wear.

  • @lezking5060
    @lezking5060 9 днів тому

    I think a more important question, arising from this video's thumbnail, is...
    Why are the Channel Islands almost completely surrounded by giant sausages?
    :-)

  • @kevanhubbard9673
    @kevanhubbard9673 13 днів тому

    A couple of Channel Islands are French of which Chausey is the best known but there are a few others like Cezembre.I believe that these 'other Channel Islands'use to come under Jersey but at some point became part of France.With the main Channel Islands French is technically an official language but English and Portuguese seem to be the main languages you'll hear on the street.

  • @stevenr2463
    @stevenr2463 14 днів тому +3

    The Channel Islands are NOT part of the UK.

  • @aranisle
    @aranisle 14 днів тому +2

    What yoke makes these videos? These islands are not in or part of the UK

  • @maryhook9478
    @maryhook9478 13 днів тому +2

    William the Conqueror brought them with him when he invaded England

  • @philroberts7238
    @philroberts7238 12 днів тому +1

    Alderney? Herm? Sark? Their history is similar to that of Jersey and, in particular, Guernsey, but is not identical.

  • @thalmoragent9344
    @thalmoragent9344 15 днів тому +2

    Everyone should know; anything on the sea or on an island within the UK's general area simply MUST be British 😅

  • @steverobbins4274
    @steverobbins4274 9 днів тому +1

    The only reason the UK owns the channel islands is because the lords wanted to remain with England and not France. England owned Brittany Aquitaine and Calais. all now french

  • @overkix
    @overkix 15 днів тому

    8:50 importing or exporting?

  • @Conorguill
    @Conorguill 10 днів тому

    Interesting suggestion that the Channel Islands are a ‘fiercely loyal part of the UK’

  • @godfreyjackson2138
    @godfreyjackson2138 11 днів тому +1

    Sark and Alderney were also occupied.

  • @CrazyCrapaud
    @CrazyCrapaud 15 днів тому +1

    Good video, but sorry to say the first words are incorrect. The Channel Islands are not part of the UK.

  • @NunyaFookenBusiness
    @NunyaFookenBusiness 7 днів тому

    Didn’t do enough research, most in the battle of Jersey were Scottish as the English were home for Christmas/New Year and that most Scots were drunk

  • @bob_the_bomb4508
    @bob_the_bomb4508 8 днів тому

    They’re not part of the UK. They hold allegiance to the Duke of Normandy. Who also happens to be the King of England.

  • @Savetime101
    @Savetime101 11 днів тому

    Interesting fact:
    My in-law's have dated their relation back to the 'Quartermain'. They were best relatives/friends with William the Conqueror. In short, I've married into royalty 😉🤣

  • @videoprotectedcom
    @videoprotectedcom 15 днів тому +3

    Humans doing what they know best, fighting.

    • @blueballbag3588
      @blueballbag3588 13 днів тому

      And AI does what it does best - compile sentences with no understanding of the topic!

  • @Vraelir
    @Vraelir 9 днів тому

    Jerseyman here. Your opening question unfortunately contains an error - these islands are not, in fact, part of the UK, but instead fall into the category of Crown Dependencies as you later correctly point out, and are self-governing. Easy mistake to make, British geography / politics is a confusing mess!

  • @tibsky1396
    @tibsky1396 10 днів тому

    0:54 The Duchy of Normandy's map is too huge. You included the Counties of Maine and Anjou 90 years too soon.

  • @8563robbie
    @8563robbie 6 днів тому

    The Channel Islands own England. We conquered it in 1066 and nobody has ever taken it back...

  • @yindao2830
    @yindao2830 15 днів тому +2

    Better question, why isn’t France under the British crown?

    • @mbd501
      @mbd501 14 днів тому

      Because of The Hundred Years' War.

  • @jaywalker1233
    @jaywalker1233 4 дні тому

    the UK does *NOT* ‘own’ the Channel Islands - they are independent except for foreign policy under which they are protected by the U.K.

  • @PSHomebrew
    @PSHomebrew 9 днів тому

    imagine looking out and seeing france knowing u stopped that country from invading u.. pride right there.

  • @johnavery3941
    @johnavery3941 15 днів тому +1

    I stopped watching after the first sentence.... as someone who has is lived in Jersey, the Channel Island I can confirm are and and never been part of the United Kingdom... they are a Crown Dependency. Have another go.

    • @ura9390
      @ura9390 15 днів тому

      Vid full of errors, AI garbage

  • @Buckminster.Fullerene
    @Buckminster.Fullerene 15 днів тому +3

    Spelled Vichy not Vishy

  • @operationretribution1263
    @operationretribution1263 15 днів тому +3

    Um, the Germans DID occupy the islands during WW2.

    • @ura9390
      @ura9390 15 днів тому +4

      Vid full of errors, AI junk

    • @GroteGeer
      @GroteGeer 14 днів тому

      Churchill's focus was on the mainland. He let Hitler believe that the islands were heavily defended - this caused Hitler to over-deploy the islands. There was never any serious fighting for them. After D-Day the islands with their inhabitants and German soldiers became isolated from everything.

  • @SkepticalChris
    @SkepticalChris 14 днів тому

    The island of Jersey also has given mankind the apex example of the pinnacle of masculinity, Henry Cavill

  • @natheriver8910
    @natheriver8910 14 днів тому

    very enlightening

  • @lochlandean7518
    @lochlandean7518 15 днів тому +1

    Are you using AI for your voice overs now?

    • @Knowledgia
      @Knowledgia  15 днів тому +2

      There is no AI narration on our channel. We collaborate with 2 amazing narrators. Please check the previous videos as well :)

    • @ura9390
      @ura9390 15 днів тому

      @@Knowledgiawell they cant pronounce words properly and talk like AI robots, get someone else

    • @ura9390
      @ura9390 15 днів тому +1

      Yes it’s clearly AI, cant pronounce words properly

    • @semensimon1266
      @semensimon1266 15 днів тому

      Yeah they are

    • @blueballbag3588
      @blueballbag3588 13 днів тому

      @@Knowledgiaplease dont do AI! Thank you

  • @archiebald4717
    @archiebald4717 12 днів тому +1

    They are not a part of the UK.

  • @Jack-xo2zp
    @Jack-xo2zp 15 днів тому +2

    These videos would be much more watchable if you would quit zooming in and out and constantly moving the views of the camera. Your video antics are just irritating eyeballs. Otherwise, thanks for the history lessons.

    • @blueballbag3588
      @blueballbag3588 13 днів тому

      But the history lesson is AI and actually a lot is wrong in this vid!

  • @m.e.k.5342
    @m.e.k.5342 11 днів тому

    At these times, BRITTANY was FREE and INDEPENDANT.
    And even, gave a help to William to invade England!
    Further more, the Channel Islands belonged to BRITTANY before the Vikings raids.

  • @bilborocky2423
    @bilborocky2423 8 днів тому

    It’s called the English Channel. Anything in it is and should always be just that, English.

  • @andrewtwinam8528
    @andrewtwinam8528 11 днів тому

    When the King visited back in 2024, he changed his title to the Duke Of Normandy, not King.

    • @leenorman853
      @leenorman853 10 днів тому

      He didn't "change his title"! As the heir of William the Bastard, he has been Duke of Normandy since his mother died. Every English monarch since 1066 has been Duke of Normandy.

  • @faenethlorhalien
    @faenethlorhalien 15 днів тому +7

    I mean, they're basically occupied French territory... Or I'd rather say, Normand territory. If they were to go back to France, well, we all know what has happened to all regional identities in France that are not in line with the Napoleonian ideal of French-ness.

    • @alphaomegon3683
      @alphaomegon3683 15 днів тому

      That’s very true and very untrue. Untrue inasmuch the local identity, notably the different languages, has largely been weakening over the decades, since 1940 notably and the relocation of thousands of children to the safety of England.

    • @Ygddhgrd
      @Ygddhgrd 15 днів тому +2

      They're not occupied French territory, they were Norman, which was not part of France it was it own thing. Then England technically became part of Normandy/they merged. The France invaded/retook Normandy but not the Channel Islands or England etc

    • @ura9390
      @ura9390 15 днів тому

      “Back to France” 🤡

  • @leenorman853
    @leenorman853 10 днів тому

    "Why are these islands a part of the UK?" Because THEY'RE NOT PART OF THE UK! England (not the UK) became a possession of the Duchy of Normandy in 1066. Technically, these islands (all that's left of the Duchy of Normandy) own England. They are self-governing and have a feudal relationship with the monarch, aka the Duke of Normandy, King of England (and the rest of the UK, not to mentiion many other countries).

  • @juanrodriguezforero557
    @juanrodriguezforero557 15 днів тому

    There are tough still the Chausey islands who are to this day belong to France.
    Who belong geographicly to the name Channel Islands

  • @PSI-qf8bq
    @PSI-qf8bq 6 днів тому

    What about other islands in Baliwick's and not forgetting Sark. I thought both Guernsey and Jersey were crown dependencies?
    They have their own legislative bodies, and neither have ever joined the EU.
    Lived and worked on Guernsey for a few years. Very pleasant place to both live and work. Kings representative is a Governor, like the Falklands Islands.

  • @Sam-gr5ij
    @Sam-gr5ij 13 днів тому +1

    well they are not part of the UK

  • @mrfrisky6501
    @mrfrisky6501 14 днів тому +1

    If you were an island and wanted security who would you choose..😂😂

    • @ura9390
      @ura9390 13 днів тому +3

      Any country with a robust navy that respects self determination and self governance. Britain actually is not bad at this

  • @PhilLewis-xg7iv
    @PhilLewis-xg7iv 8 днів тому

    AI ruining our history before your very eyes, and yet we do nothing, how very obedient we've become. That is worrying.

  • @aleddave
    @aleddave 12 днів тому

    Because the islands are surrounded by waves, and Britain rules the waves.

  • @james_baker
    @james_baker 15 днів тому +2

    They'll be fine until the argies come sniffing around

  • @anthonywatts2033
    @anthonywatts2033 14 днів тому +1

    The corruption of the english language is sometimes laughable, other times cringeworthy.....

    • @ura9390
      @ura9390 13 днів тому

      AI does its best! Not too bad of you think about it though still has some way to go

  • @liveinhope
    @liveinhope 12 днів тому

    This video is so wrong. The northern island, Alderney is coloured as if it is part of France but it is part of the Bailiwick of Guernsey

  • @juanpablo681
    @juanpablo681 12 днів тому

    Crops of corn? Before Columbus brought it from the American territories? Something isn’t right or I am missing somethin

  • @stanley5543
    @stanley5543 5 днів тому

    La france devrait les revendiquer et leur donner un statut particulier comme pour les départements et les collectivités d'outre-mer.

  • @SB-qm5wg
    @SB-qm5wg 12 днів тому

    To be fair the US has New Jersey, which has contributed to the World classics like uh.. Jersey Shore.

  • @benformoney
    @benformoney 15 днів тому +1

    Always wondered this...

  • @drdeadred851
    @drdeadred851 12 днів тому +1

    Rather off topic, but its pretty mindblowing to think that even back in the 1600s people were sailing from the channel islands in small fishing boats all the way to the Hudson bay just to then come all the way back to sell the fish.
    Meanwhile in the modern day with massive cargo ships with diesel engines and refrigeration it was a massive point of contention and often considered insane to suggest that the UK could trade with countries OUTSIDE of the EU. That importing food from anywhere else was seemingly impossible.
    Even then less than a century prior we'd been regularly importing food from places like New Zealand and Oz, lamb and butter from the other side of the world. But for some reason people just considered it totally insane, even then it was all under the hyper unrealistic idea that the UK would just totally stop all trade from/to the EU. (which also never happened shockingly)
    All of this just goes to show how monumentally ignorant people will wilfully be just to try and win a political argument.

  • @Porkcylinder
    @Porkcylinder 12 днів тому

    Because Britain has consistently kicked their arses

  • @PASTRAMIKick
    @PASTRAMIKick 15 днів тому

    They're de jure part of the Duchy of Normandy, but that title no longer exists so they're English by de facto

    • @Ygddhgrd
      @Ygddhgrd 15 днів тому

      They're not English, as they're not in England/part of England. They also aren't part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. They are each crown dependencies, which is a very unique situation, but in reality essentially makes the islands independent.

    • @johnavery3941
      @johnavery3941 15 днів тому +1

      @@Ygddhgrd correct they are no more English than Scotland or the Isle of Man

    • @stevebarlow3154
      @stevebarlow3154 14 днів тому

      @PASTRAMIKick The title of Duke of Normandy still exists, it is one of the titles of the British monarch. And it is always Duke of Normandy, the loyal toast by Channel Islanders, even for the late Queen Elizabeth, it was to 'The Queen, our Duke'.

    • @ChrisCrossClash
      @ChrisCrossClash 13 днів тому

      @@johnavery3941 We English just have another thing to laugh at the French for. 😂😂

  • @jonglewongle3438
    @jonglewongle3438 15 днів тому

    The nazis could have offered the channel islands to the french to curry cred with the french, but the nazis considered the french to be racially inferior to the british, so that they were too inperious and thus too clever by half

    • @alainprostbis
      @alainprostbis 14 днів тому

      and yet after the battle of Bir HAkeim, Hitler reiterated:
      "Bir Hakeim is new evidence of the thesis I always defended: the French are, after us, the best soldiers in Europe. Even with its current birth rate, France will always be able to field a hundred divisions."
      AH had lost a lot of respect for England when they fled the battlefield at Dunlirk in 1940, protected by the French...

    • @ChrisCrossClash
      @ChrisCrossClash 13 днів тому

      @@alainprostbis Hitler did not say that at all you liar, Hitler likes the British a hell of lot more than the French that's for sure.

  • @theshadow5800
    @theshadow5800 14 днів тому

    The better question is why doesn't France belong to England like most of it did in the olden days?

  • @ghollidge
    @ghollidge 10 днів тому

    Why isnt France apart of Britain? That is the question

  • @TheBandit025Nova
    @TheBandit025Nova 15 днів тому +4

    Short Answer because Britinana rules the Waves

  • @appalachianridgerunners6571
    @appalachianridgerunners6571 12 днів тому

    A Corn Crop in 1338? What king of corn was this corn? Isn’t corn an American crop?

  • @memazov6601
    @memazov6601 15 днів тому +12

    Because its a f you to france in olden days

  • @garymcguire8529
    @garymcguire8529 13 днів тому

    A deeper question to ask, is why have they never been part of the EU and why can't mainland British people go and live there?

    • @blueballbag3588
      @blueballbag3588 13 днів тому +1

      Because they are crown dependencies and not part of the UK

    • @stuartdelamare4072
      @stuartdelamare4072 6 днів тому +2

      Sadly plenty of rich English and foreigners live in Guernsey now. so much the way of life has changed for the worse. there’s actually nowhere for the locals to afford a house. while the rich can get up to 30% tax relief. there only here to launder their money. Through companies and banks. It won’t be long before it looks like Birmingham or Luton 👍🇬🇬

  • @michaelbolger745
    @michaelbolger745 3 дні тому

    When you talk about the Channel islands, call them the English channel islands. the use of English/british and uk doesnt make sense, unless you mean england is all of the. Which it's not

  • @jamesjenner8159
    @jamesjenner8159 11 днів тому

    The Channel Islands are not part of the UK and part of the archipelago, Chausey, is French!