New HYBRID DESTROYS Jet Engines

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 гру 2023
  • General Electric released a crossover ramjet and rotating detonation to make a full-scale, propulsion system feasible at speeds faster than Mach 6. But what is RDE and how is this going to change aviation?
    Sources & Credits:
    • Simulating Supersonic ...
    • Simulating Methane-Oxy...
    • Transparent RDE : High...
    • Velo3D Qualified Mater...
    • ROTODET Rotating Deton...
    • NASA’s 3D-printed Rota...
    • The Mighty J58 - The S...
    • Venus Stargazer™ Space...
    • How a Gas Turbine Work...
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 146

  • @bishopdredd5349
    @bishopdredd5349 5 місяців тому +164

    “Destroys” mandatory keyword in a headline to trigger dopamine in teenagers and tickle the UA-cam algorithm.

    • @re-plainsman
      @re-plainsman 5 місяців тому +6

      Just like "takes the world by storm' cliché

    • @michaeldanmosley4169
      @michaeldanmosley4169 5 місяців тому +1

      what about DREDD ?? 😂

    • @alpacker2741
      @alpacker2741 5 місяців тому

      Exactly...the kids have taken control.

    • @fasted8468
      @fasted8468 5 місяців тому +2

      Made me click not gonna lie

    • @Sirbadone
      @Sirbadone 5 місяців тому +1

      Lmao u are so right
      "In the future, there wont be click baiting"

  • @Scottx125Productions
    @Scottx125Productions 5 місяців тому +15

    Yeah, the big problem with aerospikes is they don't conduct heat away and are also quite heavy. But if we can make advances in material science that eliminate those issues. Plus make advancements in rotating detonation engines. It's gonna be an amazing future, not just for more powerful engines, but more efficient and clean.

    • @ss-to7ii
      @ss-to7ii 5 місяців тому +1

      I have read of AI be used for the sole purpose of novel materials. What do you think of that?

    • @mnomadvfx
      @mnomadvfx 5 місяців тому +1

      "Yeah, the big problem with aerospikes is they don't conduct heat away and are also quite heavy"
      That assumes the aerospike is solid metal, which isn't sensible on any rocket engine where weight is a concern as you multiply them to create the total rocket vehicle thrust.
      Better to make it hollow, but filled with pipes so the cryo-cooled fuel can be pumped through the engine to cool it down before it is used for thrust.

    • @kingarthurthe5th
      @kingarthurthe5th 5 місяців тому

      @@mnomadvfx To my knowledge, that's why 3d printing was used to make NASA's aerospike, since the cooling channels can be built-in the spike itself and they can use better geometry to channel the heat out faster. (My guess would be some form of gyroid, or tesla valve)

  • @fasted8468
    @fasted8468 5 місяців тому +2

    My friend showed me a picture of this theory 3 years ago. He was a certifiable genius, cold fusion, transmutation, biology, photo-chemistry, mycology, electricity, everything.
    RIP Rush Steve, thanks for showing me this before you took off. Love you man.

  • @williamlloyd3769
    @williamlloyd3769 5 місяців тому +34

    Incredible engineering not to mention the manufacturing process.

    • @WarkWarbly
      @WarkWarbly 5 місяців тому +3

      Old news. Integza did a deep dive on this a year ago:
      ua-cam.com/video/fRMMSyCcTDI/v-deo.html

    • @matthewmcintosh4925
      @matthewmcintosh4925 5 місяців тому

      ​@@WarkWarblycongratulations, give that man a tomato. Ah what the hell have a 1kg bag.

  • @D2_Papaya
    @D2_Papaya 5 місяців тому +17

    would love to see a video where all the different rocket and jet types are simplistically explained like in here, would be good to get outsiders into this stuff because it all sounds very exciting but difficult to get into.

    • @Tech_Planet
      @Tech_Planet  5 місяців тому +3

      I can definitely make one in the future when there is more turbine based rde's. It's a relatively new engine being tested and lots of exciting developments coming up.

    • @fasted8468
      @fasted8468 5 місяців тому

      Those videos do incredibly well.
      Steam engine VS Sterling engine VS gasoline 4 cycle, 2 cycle, VS diesel VS electric, VS experimental etc. I'd watch that in a heartbeat and I pretty much know the difference already.
      Something to fall asleep to.

  • @effingsix3825
    @effingsix3825 5 місяців тому +9

    Here’s a good idea. You take an aero spike cone, split it in half, put the halves at the ends of a linear aerospike, making rotating detonation possible around the whole linear aerospike.(The rotating detonation wave would have to get around the ends of the linear aerospike continuously)You also use a very large 3-D printing machine to make the fuel tank possible, which wasn’t available at the time that SSTO vehicles were being developed.

    • @larrybrown8180
      @larrybrown8180 5 місяців тому

      Yes! Why is a circular (cylindrical) geometry necessary?

    • @effingsix3825
      @effingsix3825 5 місяців тому +3

      You could have multiple ‘waves’ of detonation operating concomitantly around the entire course, rather than say, having two opposed in a circular tube.

  • @sabercruiser.7053
    @sabercruiser.7053 5 місяців тому +1

    Outstanding work flawless great editing and technical explanation 🙌🙌👏👏👍👍🔥🔥 keep it up

  • @judgecowartjr5317
    @judgecowartjr5317 5 місяців тому +1

    Excellent thread and great technical advice and information to improve efficiency of Turbine and Rocket engines 🎉

  • @kodiakmkv
    @kodiakmkv 5 місяців тому +1

    Thanks for the great explanatory video👍😮

  • @mikehughesdesigns
    @mikehughesdesigns 5 місяців тому +2

    Good info. (Hey, was that a magnetic motor I saw on your shelf?)

  • @mlmccollum100
    @mlmccollum100 5 місяців тому

    Great video first of yours i have seen. Subscribed and will watch more

  • @GuardianLords
    @GuardianLords 5 місяців тому +1

    High Tolerances = Loose Tolerances
    Low Tolerances = Tight Tolerances
    Don't confuse high tolerance with high precision.
    Use the term 'loose' and 'tight' to prevent confusing.

  • @Charlie-Oooooo
    @Charlie-Oooooo 5 місяців тому +9

    Great presentation! Would also add afterburner as a perfect place for RDE 👍

  • @garrettburrows442
    @garrettburrows442 5 місяців тому

    25 years ago I never would have thought I would see the things you only see in movies, drones, jetpacks, etc etc

  • @human_isomer
    @human_isomer 5 місяців тому +7

    0:40 pressure _always_ increases during detonation, no matter whether it is a jet engine or an RDE. That's the basis of jet propulsion.

    • @rikipatel4340
      @rikipatel4340 5 місяців тому +1

      Doesn't pressure decrease in the turbine?

    • @human_isomer
      @human_isomer 5 місяців тому

      @@rikipatel4340 first unit in a jet turbine is a compressor. Further down the compressed gas is mixed with fuel and ignited. That's where the energy to drive the compressor comes from. And in a turbojet, that's where the propulsion is generated.
      So, pressure always increases. Otherwise it would be fly backwards.

    • @msnpass2004
      @msnpass2004 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@@rikipatel4340 That's what I've always heard. It slows the air down to introduce fuel.

    • @TheMooseOnTheLeft
      @TheMooseOnTheLeft 5 місяців тому +1

      Pressure does increase during detonation, but conventional jet and rocket engines do not detonate, they deflagrate. The injector pressure in a jet or rocket engine must be higher than the combustion chamber pressure, usually by at least 20%, because fluid only flows from higher pressure to lower pressure.
      In a rotating detonation engine, the detonation pressure is higher than the injection pressure, but only temporarily as the detonation wave passes by a given injector. This can cause backflow into the injector as the wave passes. The net pressure in the combustion chamber must still be lower than the injector pressure so that everything flows in the right direction.

    • @human_isomer
      @human_isomer 5 місяців тому

      @@TheMooseOnTheLeft I don't see what your point is. There's an increase in pressure in all thermal expansion systems, not "unlike in a jet engine...".

  • @MrJdsenior
    @MrJdsenior 5 місяців тому +1

    That race began many decades ago. The pressure increases in both cases, or else there wouldn't be thrust. The difference is that in the RDE it is a detonation, where a shock front is created, otherwise known as an explosion.

  • @augustinep6193
    @augustinep6193 5 місяців тому +2

    Thanks. Merry Christmas. Happy 2024.

  • @justsayin3600
    @justsayin3600 5 місяців тому

    What strikes me the most is now A.I. is being used in numerous applications. Applications that have been on a multi- millennium slow grind, i.e., math, science, language, art, music, etc.
    I think we are about to see EVERYTHING through the lens of A.I. that will exponentially speed up technology in every aspect of life on planet earth.

  • @symplafly
    @symplafly 5 місяців тому

    Absolutely amazing stuff. Someone needs to look at the cracking threshold of compressed air. I'm going to model a simple flat plane pulsed model n see if simple combustion can occur at the barrier between the sonic wave

  • @michaelmorrison1873
    @michaelmorrison1873 5 місяців тому

    I built a drying machine which unexpectedly produced syngas and set up rotory ignition all in one fortunitly it was at low levels and I turned it off before it blew up interesting thanks for the video Mike

  • @RonLWilson
    @RonLWilson 5 місяців тому +4

    Just a dumb question but when I was a kid (long ago) I had a toy model helicopter that had jet engines at the end of the rotors that presumably depicted some futuristic helicopter that the toy manufacturer concocted.
    So my question is could one put ram jets on the tips of a rotor blade and then spin the rotor blades to get the supersonic flow needed for the ramjets and if so would there be any reason for anyone to want to do that?

    • @mikeconnery4652
      @mikeconnery4652 5 місяців тому

      The noise and power is the problem. But I was thinking an air intake through the roters might work.

    • @lohithreddy6629
      @lohithreddy6629 5 місяців тому +1

      first of all i dont think any rotor can acheive supersonic speeds

    • @Tech_Planet
      @Tech_Planet  5 місяців тому +2

      Never a dumb question, it has been tried multiple times but not really practical. ua-cam.com/video/qs7WlNrHRmA/v-deo.html

    • @rogerroth7782
      @rogerroth7782 5 місяців тому

      In the Los Angeles area there were experiments with jet engines at the end of helicopter rotors. Inglewood area.

    • @StormwatchNZ
      @StormwatchNZ 5 місяців тому

      @@lohithreddy6629rotors and propellers can reach supersonic speeds at the blade tips, however this causes a massive drop off in lift efficiency

  • @richardbriansmith8562
    @richardbriansmith8562 5 місяців тому

    Awesome Video 😊

  • @hasmukhbhai3313
    @hasmukhbhai3313 Місяць тому

    This is the future of jet and rocket engines.

  • @Triring65
    @Triring65 5 місяців тому

    You forgot JAXA's actual utilization of RDE two years ago on the S-520-31 flight mission. It generated approx. 500N of thrust for 6 seconds.

  • @magnitudematrix2653
    @magnitudematrix2653 5 місяців тому +1

    This is exciting for research and data to apply to AI and algorithms for future jet engines, expecting a 17% efficiency increase. Maintaining a burn for 210 seconds was a huge step.

  • @timothy8426
    @timothy8426 5 місяців тому +2

    It would have to fire outside of mass without disrupting the quatum magnetic fields of the material as decay. Mass is at the cosmic speed limit as mass now. Disrupting the flow of thermaldynamics singularities passing through mass increases decay of mass. Distance increases as mass decays into singularities. Heat singularities are waves of decay or renewable energy. Quatum magnetic fields are the strongest magnetic fields, but expansion weakens the magnetic fields holding materials together. The cooling system would have to be extremely colder to disrupt decay. Heat singularities passing through mass now as renewable energy striking out singularities in resistance are in equalization to thermaldynamics increasing distance increases decay and by rapidly increasing exchanging singularities as renewable energy also increases decay.Stars decay as heat loss of waves of thermaldynamics singularities as heat singularities outside of entanglement of mass as dark energy throughout space as perpetual motion. These singularities are always at the cosmic speed limit in resistance in and out of entanglement of mass. Quatum magnetic fields of redirected trajectories of thermaldynamics singularities passing through mass reduce distance of perpetual motion as force fields holding mass together in cycling circulation patterns. To increase distance of forward momentum, these renewable energy singularities strike our atmosphere in equilibrium now. The earth's magnetic field redirects quatum magnetic fields of grounding as weight of force towards the greater magnetic field of earth's center force of flow. Aging increases as decay increases. If renewable energy can't keep up with distance of equalization of exchanges of cold and thermaldynamics singularities cycling circulation then magnetic fields break down and more thermaldynamics singularities of heat loss. Cold stripping thermaldynamics singularities away faster than replacement of pressure.

  • @pointblank1978
    @pointblank1978 5 місяців тому

    Sr72 has been in operation for at least 10 years. Made public bout 5 years ago.

  • @adinb6876
    @adinb6876 5 місяців тому +1

    More hard info on the ge dual mode design, if it’s available from anywhere, puhleeeze!

  • @0neIntangible
    @0neIntangible 5 місяців тому +1

    Water injection for superheated steam > adding to nozzle thrust & cooling.

  • @minedminemind5656
    @minedminemind5656 5 місяців тому

    What progress has been made in the combating of inertia?

  • @bowieinc
    @bowieinc 5 місяців тому

    I had an idea for a RDE. Probably been thought of but, imagine a circular Tesla valve set up but all channels are twisted like gun rifling. Could be several layers towards center with “twist” angle it self variable reducing and expanding pinch points in Tesla valve. Also defeats the no moving parts idea, but unit itself could spin within a stationary cylinder. 3/4 of the way twist, valve shapes are reduced before exit to kickstart fluid centrifugal motion.

  • @helmutzollner5496
    @helmutzollner5496 5 місяців тому

    Very interesting

  • @jeffcziranka6349
    @jeffcziranka6349 5 місяців тому

    The future looks bright. Just keep watching forward looking channels and everything will be okay.

  • @userunfriendly9304
    @userunfriendly9304 5 місяців тому

    Mach 17 would create a noticeable change in felt gravity, which is just and absurd thing to think about.

  • @fortyfour6626
    @fortyfour6626 5 місяців тому

    I like the power generation idea. Would it create more energy even with cheaper lesser quality fuel?

  • @jdlessl
    @jdlessl 5 місяців тому

    I'm still salty about the cancellation of the X-43 program, I've always thought that line of research had great potential as an alternative for orbital rockets. So an engine that drastically simplifies the process of getting up to the speed regimes required for scramjets to operate is great news!

  • @peeweebarney
    @peeweebarney 5 місяців тому +2

    Why is it taking them so darn longq to make it into production? I would probably be dead by then by the time that they incorporate Mach 6 speeds to commercial airlines. I want to experience it.

    • @yggdrasil9039
      @yggdrasil9039 5 місяців тому

      Same.

    • @mnomadvfx
      @mnomadvfx 5 місяців тому +1

      Perhaps you missed the part where it's called a DETONATION engine.
      The physical stresses implied in such engines are the reason engineers have shied away from them for reliability sake until material science and newer techniques (like rotating detonation) was able to produce a viable design.

  • @lazyassbum
    @lazyassbum 5 місяців тому +1

    Nuclear detonation engine might achieve warp speed.

  • @SCKAPEE
    @SCKAPEE 5 місяців тому

    Nice😊

  • @CB27
    @CB27 5 місяців тому

    How do the exhaust gases only ever flow out the back?
    Why doesn’t the ignition of the compressed mixture expand forwards also?

    • @user-sh8cl3it2m
      @user-sh8cl3it2m 5 місяців тому

      Because the airflow into the engine directs the explosion back into the engine.

  • @jello_cudgel9213
    @jello_cudgel9213 15 годин тому

    0:22 I believe you mean “simple” design, not “simplistic”

  • @pholdway5801
    @pholdway5801 Місяць тому

    Theory is sometimes SO far ahead of useful alloys that it gets judged as IMPOSSIBLE THEN some smart Alec has an idea and it becomes OBVIOUS

  • @M3e36-99
    @M3e36-99 4 місяці тому

    Material science continues to be the limiting factor.

  • @d4untless261
    @d4untless261 5 місяців тому

    Bet the coffet of discharge is far greater... The jet age has never stopped...

  • @michaelpell2104
    @michaelpell2104 5 місяців тому

    For Internal Combustion Engines exhaust Anti-Reversion increases efficiency.

  • @justinbieber12373
    @justinbieber12373 5 місяців тому

    Still needs MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF FUEL ...... ⛽️

  • @stoiannitu2994
    @stoiannitu2994 5 місяців тому

    What about vacuum transport machine?

  • @DaveWoods-ku5em
    @DaveWoods-ku5em 5 місяців тому

    If they used a combination of titanium and hi temp alloys and ceramics then ?

  • @yoog
    @yoog 5 місяців тому

    Jet engines have technically not changed since Inception in the early 1900s. The RDE would be a brilliant step fwd. I can see them being used for rockets and scram jets /hybrids. But i don't see a place for them on commercial flights. Too noisy not enough thrust but it's definitely early days

  • @boredgrass
    @boredgrass 5 місяців тому

    I am surprised that the compression/ explosion chamber is made out of a copper alloy. My *"couch-expertise" tells me that the properties of the members of an alloy contribute to the properties of the alloy. Or, if so, is the goal a heat resistance combined with a certain flexibility? *I am really speculating here!

  • @wikkid1show569
    @wikkid1show569 5 місяців тому

    A common problem still hasn't been addressed. Even having a small amount of efficiency it doesn't have enough impact. I have studied this for many years and missing a key component. A recoil action is required for more than 75% efficiency. Using less fuel is the goal and gains in displacement.
    I'm calculating speeds way beyond mach 10 because I also studied this by observing what characteristics was employed in the Orion project. The detonation was raw but it only captured a pie cut from the explosion and wasn't really effective or efficient due to a mass that was equally lost because it wasn't contained. I came to the very same conclusion and by having the engine 3D printed and yeah this one has moving parts. We can't contain a Nuclear explosion of that caliber but here's how I captured the pie . A study of Naval Destroyers with very big guns , when fired the recoil is absorbed by the entire ship , moving this mass a degree or so of actual.
    My recoil wouldn't be firing shells but just fuel and oxidation but what became important is the ignition system and the best would be Plasma which is provided by laser's and disk which also offers a boost as well . If you need to know what's happening just take a look at the Orion's pistons and absorption plate .
    Pistons are the keys because a recoil by any action in space is a way of free thrust granted.
    The day I get a contract is when they all lose . I took on what Wernher Von Braun signed on to the Orion project and did what he did , he studied the characteristics because it would be effective but not with the current technology during his time . After all he did bring forth the Saturn V and the hand made F1 engines that put humanity's first step on the moon . I figured out how and why this is important to make an effective pulse detonation propulsion system that allows for greater travel throughout our solar system
    Cheers

  • @fasted8468
    @fasted8468 5 місяців тому

    Please do a GEET engine and Malcom Brendalls thunderstorm generator?
    "Martin Flesichman Memorial Project" "Bob Greenyer" would be the ones to contact. To prove it true or false, one way or another :)
    thanks for all you do.

  • @yggdrasil9039
    @yggdrasil9039 5 місяців тому

    You could basically create a space plane that went to the lower stratosphere at Mach 6, glided for a bit, then dropped back into the troposphere to your desired destination.

    • @johnbash-on-ger
      @johnbash-on-ger 4 місяці тому

      Wouldn't that be a stratospheric plane or stratoplane instead of a spaceplane?

  • @clairmorrill8660
    @clairmorrill8660 5 місяців тому

    I had a little bit complicated theory idea, is the high operating temperature caused when burning liquid fuels? The operating temperature could be lowered by burning gaseous fuels instead of liquid fuels, however this would need more research later on

    • @Gary91511
      @Gary91511 5 місяців тому +1

      No, jet engines work by spraying the fuel and creating a vapor that ignites, kind of a mix between a liquid and a gas

    • @TheMooseOnTheLeft
      @TheMooseOnTheLeft 5 місяців тому

      This is commonly done for a few reasons. In jet engines, the oxidizer is already a gas, and in rocket engines, the fuel and sometimes oxidizer are used as coolants which boil and become a gas during the cooling process.

  • @tenlittleindians
    @tenlittleindians 5 місяців тому

    This engine will never see Mach 16 or even close to that number, that's my prediction.
    To achieve this speed you need to be at the edge of space or in space where there is little or no air friction.
    And if your flying that high already, it makes more sense to just orbit like a satellite and setup a reentry glide path back down to your destination. That coming down wouldn't need any engine at all. A small motor at that point for course correction is all that would be needed.
    H.G. Wells predicted we would be shooting spacecraft into space with a giant cannon. The movie version of his predictions came out in 1936 and his prediction date was 2036 for the moon.

  • @gonzalomorenoandonaegui2052
    @gonzalomorenoandonaegui2052 5 місяців тому +2

    RDEs are the the peak of combustion based power generation, but I will bet on nuclear electric for the near future of propulsion tech.

  • @rogerroth7782
    @rogerroth7782 5 місяців тому

    My initial thought that the information was fluff.

  • @terryhutchinson6503
    @terryhutchinson6503 4 місяці тому

    Copper, high temperature?

  • @westmassdave7354
    @westmassdave7354 4 місяці тому

    If it doesn’t work in space it’s worthless

  • @DanFrederiksen
    @DanFrederiksen 5 місяців тому

    ram and scram works without whatever RDE is and you never explained RDE. Unless it can replace a normal jet engine it's hard to spot the use

  • @re-plainsman
    @re-plainsman 5 місяців тому

    Why does this guy sound like the Honey Badger guy?

  • @michalhaubner2104
    @michalhaubner2104 5 місяців тому

    Sketchy on the technicalities.

  • @whytrimmed6930
    @whytrimmed6930 4 місяці тому

    How long before some rich kids buys one and puts it on his car?

  • @AflacMan13
    @AflacMan13 5 місяців тому

    Isn't anything over Mach 3.5 melting?

    • @zachmoyer1849
      @zachmoyer1849 5 місяців тому

      has to be designed like the shuttle with ceramic tile protection they did this with x43

  • @JoshuaCollins
    @JoshuaCollins 5 місяців тому

    "there is no moving parts"
    🙄

  • @MilushevGeorgi
    @MilushevGeorgi 5 місяців тому

    Good channel too bad the clicky title

  • @cwilliams1194
    @cwilliams1194 4 місяці тому

    Shit toss on a 426 Hemi with a supercharger that'll get her.

  • @elvispressedtalot9899
    @elvispressedtalot9899 5 місяців тому

    That's.gonna be awesome !.
    Seeing a normal plane have this engine.
    Climbing to 15000ft and just zoom through airless atmosphere! And reach Mach 8 . Landing 4mins after take off.
    That's the future ! I'd enjoy flying an airline.
    Jet engines ! I don't trust . Because 2 fail and we go falling from the sky

  • @kennethhicks2113
    @kennethhicks2113 5 місяців тому +2

    I think hobbist's with new 3D printing methods will overcome the politics of companies/gov and discover some very innovative stuff with these engines. SpaceX was just first.
    What would be a miracle is a business redesign... the bureaucracies and agenda's of the large companies...the true barrier.

  • @DaveWoods-ku5em
    @DaveWoods-ku5em 5 місяців тому

    Does destroy engines the sonic bom would do that

  • @ekspatriat
    @ekspatriat 5 місяців тому

    How the F does this thing destroy jet engines?

  • @j.c.9461
    @j.c.9461 5 місяців тому

    Just build SEGs

  • @justinmillard3595
    @justinmillard3595 5 місяців тому +1

    RDE, 4,000 pounds of thrust
    F-135, 43,000 pounds of thrust

  • @curtisbanks1136
    @curtisbanks1136 5 місяців тому

    AMEN , AND AI , PROGRAMED WITH THOSES IDEAS WILL WORK.

  • @jeffreyspinner9720
    @jeffreyspinner9720 5 місяців тому

    Just ask Russia's engineers, they've already solved the issue. Alternatively, you could have the MIC ask OpenAI nicely GPT 5 could solve that and you don't have to hold its beer.

  • @patricknintemann924
    @patricknintemann924 5 місяців тому

    Toyota Prius rams Airplane

  • @kalliste23
    @kalliste23 5 місяців тому

    Use an RDE to get a Ramjet up to speed. The RDE becomes the inlet at Ramjet speeds.

  • @azarahwagner2749
    @azarahwagner2749 2 місяці тому

    😂😂😂😂
    Hypersonic tech has been around for years. Only thing is it is not viable for anything but missiles

  • @chasewhiteman2501
    @chasewhiteman2501 5 місяців тому +1

    ⚡️🇺🇸⚡️

  • @murraybevan1721
    @murraybevan1721 5 місяців тому

    It will never work!

  • @ah244895
    @ah244895 5 місяців тому +1

    Almost didn’t watch it because of click baity title

  • @calledout4437
    @calledout4437 5 місяців тому

    More things ai will solve for us.

  • @matthewwrynn8595
    @matthewwrynn8595 4 місяці тому

    For all the haters of the rotating engine for the last 3 years suck it.

  • @anjaandrepoulin1769
    @anjaandrepoulin1769 5 місяців тому

    David Adair has a way better engine but they/ Cabal don't want it because it's too advanced and it all comes down about making money.if they don't make money

  • @jonmajarucon51
    @jonmajarucon51 5 місяців тому

    Doesn’t destroy anything.

  • @TeamStevers
    @TeamStevers 5 місяців тому

    This is one of the AI channels that need to go.

  • @whiffingherbs
    @whiffingherbs 5 місяців тому

    goofy ahh ai generated thumbnail using the caption "space jet engine irliner realistic"

  • @animalbird9436
    @animalbird9436 5 місяців тому

    Click bait

  • @mattmunroe4928
    @mattmunroe4928 5 місяців тому

    I almost flagged you as one of those SPAM fake AI channels...

  • @kelleysimonds5945
    @kelleysimonds5945 4 місяці тому

    Clickbait

  • @Neon-ws8er
    @Neon-ws8er 4 місяці тому

    the ai thumbnails make me sick

  • @ericvanvlandren8987
    @ericvanvlandren8987 5 місяців тому

    What a stupid headline

  • @raywhitehead730
    @raywhitehead730 5 місяців тому

    Bunch if crap

  • @TheSkytherMod
    @TheSkytherMod 5 місяців тому +1

    Very dissapointed in this creator. Classic clickbait title and an AI generated image as a thumbnail.
    Zero skill required to run a youtube channel i see

  • @surrindernayar
    @surrindernayar 5 місяців тому

    Tired of watching utter BS on UA-cam.

  • @aaronogawa8339
    @aaronogawa8339 5 місяців тому

    The narrator has a very boring. Voice

  • @alexandremilk3020
    @alexandremilk3020 4 місяці тому

    Woa they created the first jet engine inverter like the a.c. lol

  • @wokeaf9531
    @wokeaf9531 4 місяці тому

    If I fly a plane it better have the above whatever speed engine in it.

  • @W1nd3yWHISTL3
    @W1nd3yWHISTL3 5 місяців тому

    In a dying world with cranking c02ppm we always need more pollution !