AXISFLYING CineON C35 Cinewhoop Review 🛸

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 65

  • @AlbertKimTV
    @AlbertKimTV  2 роки тому +8

    CineON C35/C30 BNF - bit.ly/3EfDv58
    Frame Kits - bit.ly/3Cv8mZZ
    Frame/Motor Combos - bit.ly/3SCJCVi
    Prop Guards - bit.ly/3Cwv5Fd
    AxisGrips - bit.ly/3Eh2h4Q
    C157 Motors for DJI AVATA - bit.ly/3RyrsCO
    Hero 11 Hyperview Flight - ua-cam.com/video/Zds1qF6Te0Y/v-deo.html
    🙏 Please support with a 👍 and don’t forget to hit the 🔔 thanks!
    💲 If you enjoy my content, please support my channel through these links
    Patreon - www.patreon.com/albertkim
    Amazon - amzn.to/3zq84zp
    RaceDayQuads - bit.ly/RDQ-BF
    GetFPV - bit.ly/3wWbziq
    Banggood - bit.ly/3imXlie
    Airblade - bit.ly/3ilYVRr
    NewBeeDrone - bit.ly/3BhFdPu
    Makerfire - bit.ly/2VGI3Kg
    Aliexpress - bit.ly/3im17IF
    XT-XINTE - bit.ly/3inl7KQ
    Insta360 - bit.ly/2VRDNe5
    PayPal - paypal.me/marblekit
    👉 Old gear for sale here - bit.ly/AlbertGearFS
    👉 Follow me on social
    🐤 twitter.com/albertkim
    📸 instagram.com/marblekit/

  • @SimplyGod100
    @SimplyGod100 2 роки тому +1

    Looks like a really powerful cinewhoop, I enjoyed this video so much, after this might actually consider to get a cinewhoop like this one!
    Great video as always, Albert!

  • @nuno5125
    @nuno5125 2 роки тому +2

    The sticky ends look great, they might work for my hybrid style.
    I don't have an Avata, but someone who has one would appreciate it
    The carbon frame kit looks really high end, with a lot of details.
    The design looks very similar to the cinelog35, but axisflying tends to be higher end.
    This cinewhoop style drones are always heavy, but as it has bigger motors it shouldn't be a problem.
    Hopefully they send this drone with a PID tune, not everybody wants to tune.
    It flies great and it is a great contender to make the slow cinematic videos.
    Awesome video Albert, lots of new products with great quality

    • @MCsCreations
      @MCsCreations 2 роки тому +1

      That's exactly what I was thinking about the stick ends as well! I'm going to search for them. 😃

  • @jlarson42
    @jlarson42 2 роки тому +1

    Great review of a well designed Cinewhoop. Easy to rebuild, flies very well on default tune. Pretty good flight time. Happy flying everyone 😎

  • @MCsCreations
    @MCsCreations 2 роки тому +1

    Fantastic flying and review, Albert! 😃
    It really flies well! Even the acro looked great!
    Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊

  • @vanlifefpv6340
    @vanlifefpv6340 2 роки тому +3

    I'd like to see that Hyperview vs Superview video.

  • @pandrews01
    @pandrews01 2 роки тому +1

    Nice products!!!! I am actually looking at axis 1404 motors for my next build. I know of them, but am unfamiliar with their reputation. I'm guessing "now" they are a relatively solid brand. Great comparison review. I was all for the GEPRC Cinelog 35, but now, I'm not so convinced. Replacing the prop guards is a much less demanding process on the CineON C35. Nice sample video. It fly's smooth on "no tune." This appears to be a great quad. I did notice that "motor exposure" and it did seem concerning (nothing to protect the motors from dust an debris) I suspect they will have time to correct or provide a simple remedy to that issue. Love the video. Excellent comparison. I like that fact that their are more choices for 3.5" cinewhoops and companies have to step up their game to attract customers. Thanks for the introduction to this cinewhoop.

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  2 роки тому +1

      I'm impressed they are able to come out with new products very quickly. For example, the mold needed for the prop guards isn't cheap to make but they've been able to do these things which probably means they have significant backing from investors into their company. Little things like this people don't know but I think they will be around for a while.

    • @pandrews01
      @pandrews01 2 роки тому

      @@AlbertKimTV I do like how they, (I suspect) see the flaws in other manufacturers then make changes accordingly to make their product better.

  • @aziadah1
    @aziadah1 2 роки тому +1

    had to replace CL35 prop guards, they are different. one side has standoff holes and if you broke the right side, it requires removing the whole frame. nothing crazy and the frame is solid imo but i use it for cinematic exclusively

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  2 роки тому

      That's too bad those are symmetrical... more points for the AXISFlying C35

    • @pandrews01
      @pandrews01 2 роки тому

      Good to know.

  • @CraigValadares
    @CraigValadares 2 роки тому +1

    Love how sleek the new cinewhoops are compared to my diatone taycan

    • @CraigValadares
      @CraigValadares 2 роки тому +1

      @@Adam_Carbone I think it's the original one. It's 4s with the 1408 mamba motors

  • @mattfly6143
    @mattfly6143 2 роки тому

    Hi, nice review, I will receive my cineon c35 Friday, do you have nice tune ? Thks

  • @velocistafpv
    @velocistafpv 2 роки тому +2

    The CL35's propguards aren't interchangeable between L & R as the standoff parts are different. The CL35 is fiddly to work with although I can imagine not more than BlueCat35.
    But after a few rounds of changing propguards and working on the CL35, it isn't that much harder than working with any quads. I'll be putting the 2105.5 motors on soon, replacing the stock 2004 on my non-Performance CL35. Loving it!
    Good review on the CineOn bro, as always. :)

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  2 роки тому

      Thanks

    • @pandrews01
      @pandrews01 2 роки тому

      I got a question, perhaps you could help. What is the biggest motor I could put on a 2.5" cinewhoop? Planning on flying with 4S batteries.

    • @velocistafpv
      @velocistafpv 2 роки тому

      @@pandrews01At least a 2004 and probably even a 2205 I think.

  • @deadlazlo
    @deadlazlo 2 роки тому +1

    Too bad about the lack of tune. Personally I find that cinewhoops need that tune to be perfect or the video suffers. Thanks Albert

    • @deadlazlo
      @deadlazlo 2 роки тому +1

      @@Adam_Carbone no arguments. Albert is a good pilot to compensate for a lackluster tune.

  • @fpvfanatic
    @fpvfanatic 2 роки тому

    Always wanted to get one of these.

  • @zonaskate
    @zonaskate 2 роки тому

    Greetings. Thanks for your videos. You who have flown the bluecat c35 and now this CineOn, which one do you think is better for cinematic flights?

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  2 роки тому

      This one will be better if you're going for a full gopro. If you're using a naked gopro the bluecat is OK for less weight. It performs less with more weight which the bigger motors of the CineON can handle with ease.

  • @rgglenn150
    @rgglenn150 Рік тому

    what pwm frequency should i choose for c35? 48khz or 24khz?

  • @jaechoe
    @jaechoe 2 роки тому +1

    Very nice looking cinewhoop, the motor exposure is a bit of a concern. After you mention that, the motor windings are all I see now. 😆 As for the GoPro comparison, Yes please!!!!! Great review Albert!!!!!

    • @nuno5125
      @nuno5125 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah the motor is more exposed, but this way the motor can cooldown way more as the wind passes in the windings.

    • @jaechoe
      @jaechoe 2 роки тому +1

      @@nuno5125 agree but because of the pusher configuration, dirt and other small things can more easily get in the motor. Just means more motor maintenance. Non-pusher style motors have the windings exposure facing down so less of an issue but eventually motors still get dirty.

    • @nuno5125
      @nuno5125 2 роки тому +1

      @@jaechoe yes that is also true, i guess it all depends on where to fly this quad.

    • @jaechoe
      @jaechoe 2 роки тому

      @@nuno5125 think in most cases it will be fine, just don't launch or land in sandy areas. This is something we don't do anyways now, so should be OK.

    • @nuno5125
      @nuno5125 2 роки тому

      @@jaechoe yeah, i totally agree with you 😀

  • @ChrisParayno
    @ChrisParayno 2 роки тому

    Interesting stickends for sure, I like those bulbus ones for sure. I also am interested in those c157 motors for sure! I got caught up in the hype but haven't felt the dip of death just yet but I've heard these will help!

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  2 роки тому +1

      You've got an AVATA?

    • @ChrisParayno
      @ChrisParayno 2 роки тому

      @@AlbertKimTV yes I have, had it for about a month or so and been using it for shots I have to be around fragile/sensitive settings and/or people. So far no issues, except some random resonance sound though I do fear of that flip of death, luckily none so far but then again I'm not cliff diving with this thing.

  • @dronemacha
    @dronemacha 2 роки тому

    The propguard is definitely looking better and durable compared to the cinelog35, and just 4 screws to replace, damn. I'm definitely ordering the frame once it's available at my country

  • @WildCaptures
    @WildCaptures 2 роки тому

    Good timing it’s lunchtime break 🍽👍

  • @grisvianbrudlie6093
    @grisvianbrudlie6093 2 роки тому

    A pretty good cinewhoop ngl. I think 6s for a cinewhoop like the protek 35 is kinda overkill but oh well.....thanks for the review Albert

    • @nuno5125
      @nuno5125 2 роки тому +1

      As this cinewhoop style drones are heavy and have big motors the 6s power is needed.

    • @grisvianbrudlie6093
      @grisvianbrudlie6093 2 роки тому +1

      @@nuno5125 i am learning more from Albert's comment section than any youtube video lmao

  • @Juicyfpv
    @Juicyfpv 2 роки тому

    I will test motors on my Avata!

  • @miguelt.7997
    @miguelt.7997 2 роки тому

    Main issue with Cinewhoops are oscillations / jello. I've built 3' and 2.5', both suffer from this.

  • @rgglenn150
    @rgglenn150 Рік тому

    do you have a tune for c35? or what's a good preset to use?

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  Рік тому +1

      I just fly whatever came from the factory. I never tune any BNF quad for a review. However, I heard they updated the tune so you should contact Axisflying for the latest tune that matches your hardware. I think there are three versions of the FC for this model now.

  • @zimmy1958
    @zimmy1958 2 роки тому

    👍

  • @chewthis5805
    @chewthis5805 5 місяців тому

    Can i use stack fc and vista?

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  5 місяців тому +1

      They are standard parts so you can use them on other frames.

    • @chewthis5805
      @chewthis5805 5 місяців тому

      @@AlbertKimTV i love this frame, just wondering it fit or not to put my old stack and vista there. So far i know only speedybee35 can do it.

  • @21y1ihuangzhongyi6
    @21y1ihuangzhongyi6 Рік тому

    How does this compare to the cinebot30?

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  Рік тому

      This one is better. Can carry more weight, has bigger more powerful motors.

  • @mikeesculto7953
    @mikeesculto7953 2 роки тому

    Do you experience any jello from your fpv camera? I tried this frame with 5 props and it shakes alot😢

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  2 роки тому

      I did not have any jello. Try different props. The props you have might be unbalanced.

  • @YorkyPoo_UAV
    @YorkyPoo_UAV 2 роки тому

    There are companies building the Shendrone Terraplane 3" and they put 2207.5 2500kv’s motors in it for their 6s.

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  2 роки тому +1

      Sounds like a one-off custom build to me... that design has a lot of the prop blocked by a huge motor. Total trash IMO.

    • @YorkyPoo_UAV
      @YorkyPoo_UAV 2 роки тому

      @@AlbertKimTV it's the same build Nurk uses. It's a pain to tune and has power but also holds a line really well. Not good at diving with ducts though.

    • @vanlifefpv6340
      @vanlifefpv6340 2 роки тому +1

      Shendrones designs are outdated and have not evolved to the current times. Dinosaurs will go extinct.