Doppler Effect

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 35

  • @turbocpt1
    @turbocpt1 2 роки тому +3

    I am so proud of you that you continued to make this video during an earthquake.

  • @matthewbrennan3127
    @matthewbrennan3127 5 років тому +1

    simplest and most concise explanation of the Doppler Effect I have ever come across, including textbooks, teachers, and all of youtube

  • @Leveneyter
    @Leveneyter 6 років тому +23

    A good trick to know the +/- sign in the formula: draw an arrow from the observer to the source of the sound. When the source moves opposite to this arrow you get v(sound)-v(source) and when the source moves in the direction of the arrow you get v(sound)+v(source). Same with the observer: if the observer moves opposite to the arrow you get v(sound) - v(observer).
    To be clear; v(sound)-v(observer) is just a part of the formula, the formula is (like in the video) f(observer) = f(source) * (v(sound) +/- v(observer)) / (v(sound) +/- v(source))

    • @lewishoanglong1610
      @lewishoanglong1610 5 років тому +1

      thank you so much! It takes me a lot of time for confusing which one is +/- sign

  • @joshprice3730
    @joshprice3730 6 років тому

    I have a Physics midterm tomorrow and you just saved me. thank you!

  • @mrkjguy
    @mrkjguy 6 років тому

    This video taught me the Doppler effect. Thank you

  • @AL-le7nr
    @AL-le7nr 7 років тому +4

    thank you so much this was so helpful! it helped me with my exam

  • @fcolo
    @fcolo 7 років тому

    Thanks for helping me with learning about the Doppler Effect.

  • @butomo3031
    @butomo3031 7 років тому +2

    Thanks you helped me with my exam

  • @ganeshseen1135
    @ganeshseen1135 6 років тому

    U r the physics tiger. Very helpful video thank you so much

  • @HarshaAntony
    @HarshaAntony 8 років тому +1

    Thank you! This video helped a lot!

  • @KJ_1611
    @KJ_1611 8 років тому

    Epic dude..... thanks now I clearly understood the concept 😁😁

  • @prasannavenkatesh8994
    @prasannavenkatesh8994 7 років тому

    Thank u so much. tom morning is my exam nd im watching this at 1.00am 🙏🙏

  • @ditamayo7095
    @ditamayo7095 8 років тому

    Super helpful video! Thank you

  • @ajeem.m820
    @ajeem.m820 5 років тому +1

    Thanks for this video sir 🙏

  • @treemanfan7718
    @treemanfan7718 4 роки тому

    I have a question, I thought the equation was f(observer)=f(source) (v(sound) +/- v(observer)) / (v(sound) +/- v(source)) why did he switch the source and observer around. Im basing it off my text book.

  • @juliajohaness2688
    @juliajohaness2688 2 роки тому

    Hallo sir
    Am little bit confused so in the question the observer is stationary and the source is moving towards the observer so that means we are using Case 1 of( Vf/V-Vo) so why did you use case 5 to find the answer in the first question?

  • @marklaurence5983
    @marklaurence5983 3 роки тому

    What math did you do to get that 878 Hz sir? Thank you in advance😇

  • @devsinha8683
    @devsinha8683 4 роки тому

    Can we use relative motion in the egale question

  • @saeviahtani
    @saeviahtani 7 років тому

    can you explain to me, please, in a video if you want, why if the doppler effect refers to sound the age of the universe it is calculated by observing the light? because: 1. the light is not sound 2. the light dose not depend on acceleration or the velocity of the emiter or reciver --- if you will make a video plese responde to this quastion here allso in my coment so the youtube will anounce me and I will see your video --- thank you!

  • @craigcoates6247
    @craigcoates6247 9 років тому +2

    good video, but on last problem shouldnt it be 15m/s over 20m/s not the other way around? and also shouldnt the answer be rounded up to 3561 Hz?

    • @dough_ha
      @dough_ha 7 років тому

      I was thinking the same thing.

    • @wxrocks
      @wxrocks 7 років тому +6

      No, the process is correct. He calculated the answer wrong (or said it wrong). It should be 3556 Hz.

    • @mrjollyguy25
      @mrjollyguy25 7 років тому +2

      For anyone who may read this comment, 20 is on the numerator because 20 m/s is the velocity of the eagle observing. 15 m/s is the velocity of the eagle emitting the sound (source). It's all in the subscripts.

    • @prasannavenkatesh8994
      @prasannavenkatesh8994 7 років тому

      +Matthew Enriquez nope bro is corct

    • @mrjollyguy25
      @mrjollyguy25 7 років тому

      prasanna franklin Wait what? I never said he was wrong.

  • @jayadevan973
    @jayadevan973 7 років тому

    thank u very much.....really helpful

  • @abegaillegaspi2956
    @abegaillegaspi2956 Рік тому

    how did that become 878??

  • @chrisminnie8323
    @chrisminnie8323 3 роки тому

    Safety factor?

  • @juhabach6371
    @juhabach6371 6 років тому

    U can search the entire UA-cam...but the formula isnt the precise one..
    Try to solve this:
    What happens when the air current speed is also there

  • @zimbabwe5489
    @zimbabwe5489 6 років тому

    Vry nice sir

  • @parsahf8560
    @parsahf8560 6 років тому

    Thanks man

  • @عبدالرحمن2018-ل6ف
    @عبدالرحمن2018-ل6ف 6 років тому

    Thx doc

  • @walusimbimoses4729
    @walusimbimoses4729 3 роки тому

    great i like what am seeing this wow