suella braverman failing on GBNews
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 тра 2024
- 🛒 Explore my unique, fun political merch at our new store! Click the link below.
etsy.com/shop/ProfessorTimsCa... !
Join me, Professor Tim Wilson, as I dissect today's headlines, offering my insights and perspectives on the latest in British politics and global affairs. With a keen eye and a bit of wit, we delve into the news that shapes our world.
🔔 Subscribe to our channel to stay up-to-date with my latest reactions and analyses. Join our community of informed viewers who value depth, nuance, and a sprinkle of humour in their news consumption.
🎥 Must-Watch: Explore My Most Popular Video Ever (5.5m+ views) on How To Write A Good Essay: • How to write a good essay
🌍 My Shorts provide concise insights and reactions to keep you informed: www.youtube.com/@ProfessorTim...
This channel serves as your go-to source for thoughtful and sometimes slightly satirical commentary on current events, political shifts, and the stories that matter. From deep dives into the mechanics of the UK government to global political dynamics and everything in between, we cover it all with the aim of enlightening, entertaining, and encouraging informed discussions.
#News #PoliticalCommentary #TalkTV #GBNews #DailyMirror #WorldPolitics #GuidoFawkes #DailyMail #TalkTV
I’d give you a million thumbs up! What a brave and smart woman is the lady on the right.
Suella is on the right! 😊
It depends on, from what point of view you look at them.
I don't think the Student was ill prepared, I think she was absolutely brilliant.
@@paulsmith2855 At what..? Everything she said was incorrect.
Braverman is a cockroach as are all tories.
Hate is all Tories like Braverman have to offer.
Just connect the links with Truus, Braverman, Farage and the Americans.
@@jonzu217 The Tory extremists are praying Trump wins in November. We are clearly seeing the far right in both countries seeking to seize power. If they succeed, we will have a new "Evil Empire". The US and Britain.
F ar l eft the same.
How on earth did that spiteful woman end up so jaded?
@@RichardPonsford-kv2uy How did she come so close to being PM lol
Crikey! Braverman totally outclassed by our nation's future. What a wonderfully impressive young lady. And isn't it any wonder the Tories dislike universities, when these well educated students are so morally superior to them.
@@massivehero4871 So you support mass immigration and genocide against indigenous people
@@massivehero4871I am not a communist, but recently they've been putting forward a better argument than the status quo does
I don't want pure communism, but we need to involve them in the discussion, as excluding them has not been good for our political debate
@@massivehero4871 As opposed to a xenophobic bunch who use divisiveness to hide self-interest!
@massivehero???? if being a communist means standing up against genocide and being pro peace then I'm in!!!
That lassie did very well to not be sucked into the tory rhetoric.
Held her ground very well and spoke with honesty whilst she basically upheld public opinion!
Surprised Braverman never accused her of being anti semitic, if that was the case, then we all would be anti semitic!
Calling Braverman a war criminal was brilliant. Especially since it was not disputed.
@@massivehero4871 , the British Government is complicit in genocide. She herself went to Israel to personally provide het support. Then she went to the protestors to do a PR job for genocidal murderers.
@massivehero4871 technically "apologist and propagandist for war criminals", but that can be a bit too wordy if it's not a formal statement in a court of law!
@@massivehero4871 It may be argued Braverman is supporting Israels actions, and therefore may be complicit if Israel is found guilty of Genocide, War crimes, Ethnic cleansing or perhaps crimes to Humanity.
@@massivehero4871she and the government are complicit with war criminals/genocide by selling Israel arm's and not calling for a ceasefire.
That young lady was fantastic.
I agree. She represented the others in her cause perfectly. Her level of ig noranc e was reassuring. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
@@lamestreammedia3154 it brightened my day to see the wizened and desperate sue verbally beaten into tiz with truth and a very clever young lady.
@@RegHoldsworth-ri7hh So why was the professor so embar rassed by her being allowed on TV? It's because she represents an ign or a nce he doesn't want the country to see. Our most Educated people protesting for the wrong reasons. Marvellous. Finally he may work out these ppl are just silly young fo ols.
She was ridiculous - she chatted a load of untrue bollocks. 'Genocide' - give it a rest.
@@lamestreammedia3154 Sad is who was in charge of the country is so dim and can't conduct a conversation.
I thought Fiona was brilliant and very courageous to appear on tv.
She had good arguments and explained herself clearly.
She also managed to annoy mr christy ..a plus factor ....as for suella.......same old same old.....😅
Braverman looks like she's losing her marbles.... the stress is getting to her.
Definitely a sandwich 🥪 or two short of a picnic 100% . I do wish they'd remember to shut the asylum windows, such an embarrassment when this one's let lose on the public.
Lightweight fascist
She never had any marbles to lose.......total clown.
Maybe better to stick to Kuennsberg, Sue Ellen!?!
The problem with most politicians and Braverman is a prime example, is they have forgotten completely they are their to serve the public, that is their role.
Somewhere along the line they acquired this preposterous notion that they should be talking at people.
They are so used to being surrounded by fawning echo chambers, when spoken to directly with common sense and truth, they all end up looking hopelessly out of touch and way out of their depth, as was so beautifully played out by Braverman.
Key question is who is picking these people to go on candidate lists?
@@jonzu217
Hard work and aptitude often comes second to cliques and nepotism.
@@pauln6803 So True
What an articulate and intelligent young woman. Let’s hope she doesn’t go into politics and is ruined by our awful system.
Sorry you must of been watching something different this student not only wiped the floor with her she totally made her look incompetent.
Braverman is much weaker in her arguments than this excellent student!
Braverman seems utterly vacuous.
Dear sir Suella Braverman is herself employing slogans, straight from the handbook of the conservative friends of Israel.
Her husband spent time in Israel and is a Zionist. So no surprise to see that Cruella is not waving a Palestinian flag.
Yes the establishment view of Israel is silly. As to is the university students that do not understand what is going on. Getting drunk and living in tents just doesn't cut it. It's not an echo chamber, it's become an echo tent.
@@lamestreammedia3154
Well, the problem is that the students are right, they have the evidence of history on their side.
@@jimtripman9002 What do you think about what happened on October the 7th?
Refused to answer the question.
“The Pale stine movement can bring down a government”
No it can't, it's a minority view. which is why labour sit on the fence over it.
“So your view is detached from what happened on October 7th and the reaction to it.?”
Again refuses to answer the actual question.
She claims the majority of the country supports her.
Wrong. Recent yougov poll 80% sympathise with both sides.Little has changed.
What's your view of ham as?
I don't want to talk about Ham as
The majority want to stop arms being sold to Israel. Correct 56%.
Thats first 2 mins.
@@jimtripman9002 one of her very first questions is she refused to answer. What do you think of a ham as. By doing that , it undermines everything else.
I'll be looking out for more of Fiona Lali with keen interest. Quite the rising star politically speaking. I think she did a great job, calling Braverman a racist, a war criminal and a backer of genocide. I don't believe those allegations are absurd at all Prof.
When did Suella take refuge at GB news.?
She was awful because she had her potlitical blikners on and was only intrested in the terrorist link that she belives the student has in supporting non violence.
Even though the student is young and not an experienced politician, she's got the skill and smartness to navigate the political swamp 😂
Sorry but the student's "I don’t want to talk about Hamas" makes her just as bad. Hamas is very much part of the argument. Not defending or attacking anyone. It is all quite awful. However if one is going to debate it (which I’m not it is all too deep for me) one should not be ignoring important contributors to the problem. It also suggests that the student IS prepared on the aspects she does wish to engage in.
She wiped the floor with her
The only surprise was that Braverman didn't bring up Corbyn's name when talking about Hamas.
The student won hands down..because she told her what most people..feel about her and she can't handle it
Oh sue, not again. And again.and again.....
1) Do you condemn HAMAS?
2) Does Israel have the right to defend itself
The problem is, these are loaded questions. .
Stock questions now along with are you anti semite.
They are not though. It should be really simple to answer and then everyone can move on. The reason it keeps being asked is because it reveals whether the person thinks it is justifiable to murder civilians and whether the person has a bias. They keep repeating that the IDF are committing war crimes, yet ignoring the fact that Hamas themselves committed war crimes on that day. It reveals a double standard.
@@darrenb3830 Nothing is black and white, that's the, with us or against us trope.
@@darrenb3830 I don't agree with the premise of the questions.
The questions in the context presupposes that the resistance, which involved acts of violence, is inherently wrong or unjustifiable, without considering the context of resisting a brutal and genocidal regime.
This question can be problematic because it simplifies a complex situation, ignoring the moral and ethical dimensions of resisting oppression and defending one's life. By framing the question this way, it pressures the respondent to either reject the resistance or to appear as if they support violence in general, without acknowledging the specific circumstances of the oppression.
@@darrenb3830 It's an irrelevant question designed to distract away from the central point . It wouldn't matter how she answered Suella Braverman would simply have twisted any answer she gave to try and paint her as pro Hamas which is her only goal in this debate.
Bravo young lady
I hope to see and hear more from Fiona . So intelligent so able .
Suella to homeless people "Let Them Eat Cake "!
The student was prepared. I would disagree that the student was ill prepared.
I agree wholeheartedly. She was brilliant.
She was absolutely hopeless - factually incorrect immature talking head lefty posturing - and I'm a lefty I voted for Corbyn.
Only to people like you. 🤡
@@spooky1304 Odd, since your language and your online "posture" don't come across as of the left. Haven't seen any criticism of Suella, either. Most odd, for a "lefty!".
@@charleshayes2528 What language do 'the left' use Charles..?
I made a comment about Braverman in this very thread.
Intresting take. Sadely tbe young Lady let herself down by refusing to answer direct questions in favour of receiting pre planned talking points. Eloquent and skillful as she was, I personally turn of when any individual refusses to address any legitimate question.
She should have responded by asking who is defending the Palastinians?
Braverman is complicit and she knows it and the guilt shows on her face.
Without a doubt, she's not the only one. The more time passes the doubling down and increased veiled venom the more they just look like an affectation.
How about the phrase 'mass murder' instead of 'genocide'? I think there can be little dispute that the IDF have and are continuing to commit mass murder.
Hostage taking is a war crime. And many haven't come back alive. That is mass murder too.
@BritProgJazz "Genocide" has a very specific meaning. See the excellent book "East West Street" by Philippe Sands. This book is both the story of a once multi-ethnic community and the battle to define the crimes of WWII. At one point, there was a struggle to establish the concept of "genocide" as distinct from "crimes against humanity".
Mass murder is a crime, even a crime against humanity, but "genocide" involves violence against the members of a particular ethnic or religious group precisely because of their membership of that group. Thus, the murders during the so-called "Rwandan Genocide" are identified as genocide because Hutu militias were targeting people on the basis of their ethnicity - that is, as Tutsi. They also killed moderate Hutu and Twa people, presumably because they did not support the violence.
While I understand oppressed peoples using the term "cultural genocide" to refer to the suppression of their language and culture, I feel it risks diluting the intensity of the original term, as referring to killing. While the deliberate suppression of a group and their culture is evil, there are plenty of instances where particular ethnic groups have survived such suppression or have been subsumed into the dominant culture only to recover their language, culture and identity later on. Literal genocide intends that there be no one to come back and nothing for them to come back to.
I don't think that woman was unprepared. Braverman obviously thought this was a fluffer appearance, and was taken aback when she found it wasn't.
The young woman in this interview was articulate and very clever in coping with Braverman's nonsense.
The world does not need to rely on the courts to establish genocide. I recall when the Serbs were slaughtering the ethnic Albanians in Kosovo, the world did not wait for a legal judgement on that genocide. Your rather shifty analysis, that genocide must be enunciated by the Courts before we can call it genocide is absurd. Israel is indeed engaged in genocide and I merely ask that you see the papers lodged by the South African Govt to see all the statements by the Israeli leadership demonstrating precisely that. This young lady did a fine job in resisting the Tory talking points to get her views across.
Hard for Suella to win when the facts are against her
Suella looks completely unhinged.
OMG the young lady is brilliant and her responses are outstanding. Well done
Politicians can be complicit in war crimes. Aiding and abetting is within the Geneva Convention. I don’t know why you presume Suella can’t be in violation.
If the student is so ill prepared I cant wait to hear her when she's on top of her game.
In the meantime let's hear more from these young protesters. They are proving to be a far more effective opposition than the LP.
Establishment politics continues to fail us.
That student was well prepared sir, you are wrong 😢!!!
she was mistaken about the genocide and the wsar criminal- alot of what she said was repeated slogans and that was weak... yet Suella was unable to deal with this. The student was VERY good- but this was at a level of student politics and Braverman was unable to respond. That is the point. It was no reflection on the student's effort which was stunning.
@@ProfessorTimWilsonShe was absolutely right about the genocide,call it whatever you like,mass murder,mass slaughter whatever name you give it,and yes braverman is a war criminal
@@ProfessorTimWilsonis that because there's no point engaging in nuanced discussion with Braverman, as she has never shown any interest or capability in doing so?
@@ProfessorTimWilson we didn't know for sure about the extent of the nazi war crimes until WW2 was over, they did not invite inspectors.
likewise the IDF is killing the press in Gaza to prevent independent reporting, we do not know ' for sure ' yet the cutting of food, water, medical supplies against a country as a war tactic is classed as a war crime.
Student destroyed Braverman.
Did not the ICJ state genocide case was "Plausible" SA offered many pages of evidence of Genocide, If you go with innocent till proven guilty, then yes, Israel isn't proven guilty. (YET). The student may have been better saying " I feel your complicit with genocide"
I think we can understand an as yet immature, though clever mind, failing to use accurate language, some imprecision is both understandable and in my mind, forgivable. The sentiment is clear her point is too. Braverman's weak attempt to deflect/dodge the issue in a shamefully patronising manner, just illustrated that she had no substantive defence against the girl's actual point.
Give the kid a break Tim, she's quite right and entitled to feel as she does. We're all aware that it's a hideously complex and complicated problem. However, Braverman understood what she was actually being challenged about, and yet again, failed to address the matter satisfactorily.
Someone who repeats rhetoric based on Marxist ideology and nonsensically calls someone a war criminal and a liar while refusing to answer questions because she claims they are "silly" and "distracting" cannot be described as clever. She wasn't able to discuss things "off script" and revealed her ignorance if not arrogance in thinking she spoke for the majority. Braverman was unable to discuss things fully with Fiona because it was Fiona who deflected/dodged issues, so I'm not sure how you expected Braverman to "address the matter satisfactorily" and she certainly wasn't patronising. She also dealt well with Fiona's rude and condescending attitude. Fiona needs to learn some manners, be better informed and develop some humility.
Absolutely fantastic young lady what a brilliant public spokesperson she is and 100% correct about braverman being out of touch with what everybody else thinks in this country . Brilliant well done young lady 🙏 war criminal is correct and don’t forget she was up against 2 people WTF Israel targeting Hamas and killing 40,000 civilians
Braverman didn't do much else but ask a few questions and Patrick Christy only spoke twice and one of those times was to repeat a question that Fiona avoided answering. So no, she wasn't "up against 2 people". Fiona doesn't know how to participate in a discussion. Fiona stated she wasn't going to answer questions because they were the "wrong questions", but in a discussion you don’t dictate the questions asked, you don’t do all the talking (without listening), you don’t avoid answering questions by claiming they are a “distraction” and then detract from the question asked about Israel, by talking about Tory policies such as austerity. She also needs to display some civility and not call people liars, stop repeating ridiculous claims such as Braverman is a war criminal, and drop the ‘know it all’ attitude by claiming she knows what the public thinks.
@@maryjones4029 how anyone on this planet can agree with braverman and sending bombs to Israel to kill innocent woman and civilians needs to look in the mirror and look at the reception she got at Cambridge university where no one spoke to her, but you have your opinions I have mine so give me that truthful young lady any day of the week , and she’s 100% correct when she says that she’s complicit in war crimes and a liar.
@@davidthomas450 They didn't speak to Braverman at Cambridge University because the 'organisers' tell them not to because they don't want to be identified because most of them are not students. That's why they wear face masks. They do this to others not just Braverman. I didn't say I agreed or disagreed with Braverman's views, I said Fiona doesn't know how to participate in a discussion for the reasons I stated and she needs to learn some humility. She doesn't know what the majority of the public think so she shouldn't assume she can speak for them. If you agree with Fiona that Braverman is a war criminal and a liar then why don't you back up your opinion with facts?
@@maryjones4029 braverman doesn’t even recognise the official war casualties and who has been supporting and supplying weapons to Israel as they are all complicit with this blatant attempt to eradicate the Palestinian people as for the students situation I don’t know them individually but even if they are not students they have a right to protest even thou the likes of braverman and her party have labelled protests as hate marches, get braverman and Fiona lali on question time and we will see who come across as the caring person as Fiona is imo 100% correct in this government puts profits above plight
@@maryjones4029 listen mary jones it’s pretty obvious that we see things from a different view so I think best leave it at that .
In my opinion, Fiona did wipe the floor with Bravermen, so much so, you couldn't help but notice, SB looking at the presenter wanting him to interject when she was being soaked!
This young lady is brilliant.
And stands for election better prepared than Braverman.
Suella Braverman comes across as someone trying to impersonate a stupid politician, like a character from The Thick of It. I think the student did well against a prominent political figure, but it’s a shame they can’t answer a simple question like “should Israel have a right to exist?” I think it undermines her argument even though it’s one I generally agree with.
She can’t answer that question because we all know the accepted ‘correct’ answer is yes, but of course it don’t have that right, but folks are very reluctant to accept that because we’re all mostly hamstrung by the Holocaust and the dread accusations of antisemitism. No violent settler colonial country has the right to exist.
@@Turnipstalk It is a simple question to answer. We don't know why Fiona refused to answer, but if she didn't on the basis you state Fiona could have asked Braverman to clarify "what Israel". That would have been the more mature response, or she could have stated why it was't a simple question to answer. However, I'm pretty certain Braverman would have been asking about the present Israel.
Israel has the right to exist to the same extent that the founders of Israel recognised the rights of the original Arab inhabitants of Palestine.
@@Turnipstalk I agree the situation can be considered complicated with regard to who has the right to what land. But I meant Fiona had no reason not to answer the question because either she believes Israel has a right to exist or she doesn't.
@@maryjones4029there's no point giving Braverman a nuanced, complex answer as she has repeatedly shown she's incapable of engaging at that level
Short, simple sentences are the only level she can manage, so you have to engage at that level
I think the student did really well.
07:26 I propose that if investigators are allowed in to find out the truth, which is not anywhere because of the lack of access, fog of war and belief from Our government that Israel government IS telling them the truth, then attitudes may change.
@SirKeefyKeef Of course the government know precisely what's going on, indeed they are complicit in it. Just like Russia/Ukraine I have heard nothing about PEACE coming from the government.
My reply has vanished again!
@@boota1979 Always annoying when that happens, I try to see which words are ‘’offensive’’ and omit them, or reword entirely my response.
@@SirKeefyKeef YT do not want debate, it's happening way to often. There is no reason why YT should remove comments that are not breaking any rules.
I remember back in the day there were some great debates on YT. It's some sort of MSM promoting channel, now it's gotten rid of the real independent researchers.
I’m convinced Bravernman is a Harry Potter dementor without the cloak. Remember to eat a biscuit.
the biscuit game
Braverman has always worked off prepared scripts whether in the Commons or, on very rare occasions, in sensitised environments (i.e. Joan Salter, Jan 2023). All her other articulations have been courtesy of Tory media outlets, typically the Telegraph.
That she couldn't hold her own against Fiona Lali, or her staged walkabout in Cambridge for that matter, shouldn't come as surprise to anyone.
Whatever you call is going on in Gaza, this may sound terribly clichéd, two wrongs don't make a right and Suella was simply barking Hamas bad ipso facto anything Israel does is justified, just ignoring the situation as is as if it were some unavoidable collateral damage in it's defense. It's pathetic.
Which is moronic as a vast swathe of the Israeli population themselves would like this horror show over, never mind students in the UK!
Mad Witch .
It wasn't a constructive debate. Mostly rooted in perceptions and narratives.
Incompetent braverman.
"The majority"? 🤔
Does anyone watch GBTV ?
The Marsh Family, NAIL IT, (again) with thier adaptation of the sound of silence, by simon and garfunkel,😂.
Fiona.. " I think that is a silly question"...
Vacuous cliche ridden Braverman defeated by a student... lol
The student was brilliant, Braverman less so.
She's maintained a steady head without drawing into "support for Hamas" etc. the way someone who's spirited and has a heart is going into the debate;she outflanked Suella Braverman on every aspect the cherry on the top was calling her a "war criminal" but I believe it belittles that term-I couldn't find the syllables to describe Suella Braverman.
I can’t help wonder that if Suella had married someone of a different faith would she be such a strong supporter of Israel? I say this because she often cites her husband’s faith to justify her outrage at these protesters. (A good job his surname wasn’t Solomon as that would imply a certain level of intellect that she clearly doesn’t have!)
Very agree
the student is bang on
Why do GB News insist on dropping the 'F' after the 'B'??? Strange...
This interview was the best video iv watched in a month schooled by brains and beauty...and this girl is a legend ...❤
The student held her own. This should be embarrassing for SB. Stuck on pause.
Take a look at the Marsh family singing 'sound of silence!
ah they are wonderful
How do people write comments on UA-cam that criticise Israel's action without them being deleted? (Asking for a friend.)
Get your thumb off the scale! The ad that came on during this broadcast was about, wait for it.
Braverman made a complete prat of herself trying to engage students at Cambridge. No insight and no ability to learn!
We should appreciate GB news for bringing to our attention the brilliant Fiona who absolutely made a fool of suella the war criminal.
Whilst the student was sloppy on the facts regarding Israel being proved to be committing genocide, and Braverman being a war criminal. But apart from that, she was brilliant and did better than I would have done.
Braverman is unfit for debating and lacks the skills needed for high office.
Professor I think you need to check the definition of interim measures. South Africa was in court yesterday in relation to the further risk of genocide. Why do you think interim measures were imposed ? There’s a duty to protect innocent civilians. To try and twist and think the aid and the cutting of water and food is justified is a complete misunderstanding of interim measures and the breach of international humanitarian law. Please also look at West Bank and tell me your thoughts on the further breach of international humanitarian law. Settlements are illegal. Israel is an occupying state. Don’t ignore the facts and give the student some latitude. She’s not a lawyer and the clown KC suella purports to be. She is supporting war crimes ergo war criminal.
Wrong again Tim saying student was ill prepared, you only finish up with splinters in your backside from sitting on the fence.
The student wasn't that ill prepared mate. SB was unprepared, and quite frankly is a bit thick. As for slogans, SB's weren't better, they were worse than the commie lass. I'm still to witness anyone successfully rebute the genocide accusation in the face of 40k deaths (murders), and many 10s of thousands with serious life changing injuries. On the occassions when someone appears to do well in such debates with a pro israeli stance, its because they shout the other person down or a biased moderator steps in. Its a genocide, and has been called a probable genocide by the highest court in the world. That will eventually be changed to a genocide.....unless the fix is in of course.
It's not a genocide because contrary to what many people believe they are not fighting Palestinians they are fighting Ha mas. They have also given warnings to civilians before they attack and called for the temporary evacuation of the local population in the northern part of the Gaza Strip.
Ha mas’ actions are designed to cause harm to Palestinian civilians and blame Israel
And, I hope you condemn hostage taking for the war crimes they are.
It's not a genocide because contrary to what many people believe they are not fighting Palestinians they are fighting Ha mas. They have also given warnings to civilians before they attack and called for the temporary evacuation of the local population in the northern part of the Gaza Strip.
Ha mas’ actions are designed to cause harm to Palestinian civilians and blame Israel
@djbogz1921 absolutely...... and no country on earth should slaughter 15k+ children under the pretence of getting back hostages (hostages they will also be killing with their bombs).
Was that actually your best reply?
Prof you may enjoy the marshes family version of the sound of silence with video of suella in you tube , the marsh family
Thanks for reminding me about the Marsh Family, that's got to be one of thier best.
Hopefully, one day, they can get back to making daft sausage videos, for fun🎉
Student answers in `Politico-speak`. Bet she stands for election within five years.
No one has yet taken Israel to court... Nor Hamas, for that matter...
South Africa raised a case of possible genocide against Israel with the International Court of Justice in January. The case is still being heard.
Didn't south Africa take Israel to court
...And now the ICC charges both sides...
I can't stand Braverman or her awful party but the young lady is absolutely hapless - horribly 'informed' talking head.
So, what would you have said to Suella Braverman then? Because apart from slating the student, you are not telling us what you would have said.
Braverman is not one of the sharpest tools in the box of spoons.
Fair points Professor but Braverman is supposed to be a professional, timeserved in a political environment and the student is doing this because she has morals. I agree that Braveman is ill suited to anything beyond standing on a soapbox and shouting indiscriminately at passers-by. As a qualified lawyer - she should have done better. She makes the mistake of her beliefs trumping her training. Ideology over practical approaches. Party over country. We all see it. You are right, though. This was not about one person overachieving but rather an overachiever very much producing an underwhelming performance. However, denuded of position and the ability to bully - this is Braverman in all her glory.
I always thought. The end of Suella was the outrageously silly
Ride on the Chinook she flew too far too soon her
Temper takes over she does not debate very well she has had a
Big part in the down fall of her party she is finished I suggest
An anger management course may help but would have to listen
For a change
You call that " unprepared " ? She was eloquent, well-informed & dignified in the delivery of her stone-cold serious arguments. I've listened to the entire clip & all I heard were logical, factual statements in response to the specific questions being asked & not a single word wasted on a throwaway-line nor vapid exclamation that might be considered a "slogan" so I don't know what you mean Professor when you say she is somehow thoughtless, indecipherable or somehow unfit to debate. You should debate her then.
I’m sorry I don’t think that student is very smart. She just regurgitates the empty phrases of her “bubble”. I don’t like Braverman, I think she is a horrible person, but from her point of view, she did rather well there. She didn’t interrupt the girl when she was making a fool of herself. Nevertheless, I feel sorry for the student who - in a few year’s time - will probably realize that she had been brainwashed.
That young lady is speaking for alot of the public as well as students. She did such a good job and spoke simple facts. Braverman and the cons are complicit in genocide and with war criminals.
Maybe you are missing the point: If I understand correctly, the student is saying to the woman that said the pro Palestinian marches were hate marches is a war criminal (very clever and humorous). It will stick with students...
Dear professor, you seem to be one of those who choose to see no evil hear no evil with regards to what is happening in Palestine. So, at what point does the atrocities becomes a genocide in your view? When you provide cover and make excuses for a genocidal regime like the current one in Israel, like Suella et all do, the student is right, she can be tared with the same brush as the people she is making excuses for.
How can Israel stop genocide if they have not already started it?????
If I did to you what Israel is doing to palistine what would you call it then ?
@@joeblog-yw9tn
It's not a genocide because contrary to what many people believe they are not fighting Palestinians they are fighting Ha mas. They have also given warnings to civilians before they attack and called for the temporary evacuation of the local population in the northern part of the Gaza Strip.
Ha mas’ actions are designed to cause harm to Palestinian civilians and blame Israel
I thought the student done a great job, but I am not as knowledgeable on the subject as you are
the issue is not whether the student did a good job- she did well enough but she relied on labour slogans rather than review the facts- the real issue is that suella braverman could not deal with any of it.
Two against one, the young lady done well.
The students argument was brilliant. Suella asks questions to inflame, and deflect.
Great job not falling for that Tory dross.
If we want to maintain our way of life we need an army to protect it. Russia is winning.
Sorry Professor, I thought the young Lady did well.
Braverman, worse than having no skill to debate, was like a "stuck record". "Hamas! Hamas!"
Painful. .
Fiona doesn’t need your back handed comments prof. What silly slogans has she been repeating?
Ones that got her banned from college campuses.
If the student thinks her opinion reflect `the majority` then just ask us. No one agrees with her `Oopp North`, outside of renowned regions. Where I wouldn't walk at night...
Which regions are those? Because I live "Oop North" and virtually everyone I know would broadly agree with the student.
Recent polls have shown a majority support ending arms sales to Israel. That doesn’t mean you’re part of that majority or that your neighbours are, but it’s what the polls say so she’s not wrong to cite them.
@@StormhavenGaming At the end of the day Fiona can't claim she knows what the majority think and assume she speaks for them. She needs to learn some humility.
@@maryjones4029 I was merely responding to the OPs assertion that "no one" agrees with her in the North. I would suggest that such an assertion is as lacking in "humility" as the student's.
😂👍👏👏👏👏