2018 Omega Seamaster vs Rolex Submariner (Diver 300M 210.30.42.20.01.001 vs 116610LN

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 799

  • @ralentinovossi8081
    @ralentinovossi8081 6 років тому +555

    You forgot about availability, that alone makes the Omega the winner lol. Nobody with dignity and self-respect has got time to play Rolex's game.

    • @the1916companywatchreviews
      @the1916companywatchreviews  6 років тому +46

      Another vote for Omega!
      - WatchBox Team

    • @Mohammedalyafeimusic
      @Mohammedalyafeimusic 6 років тому +8

      Great comment 👍🏼

    • @Makul-rt4sz
      @Makul-rt4sz 5 років тому +74

      true...I'm just switching from Rolex to Omega because of this..not going to beg someone to let me buy some expensive jewerlly

    • @nicholasdavies8795
      @nicholasdavies8795 5 років тому +12

      Totally agree ! More availability more sales .

    • @kingarchnyc
      @kingarchnyc 5 років тому +1

      Carter Lamont shouldn’t that be a benefit? XD popularity!

  • @thebeardedyorkshireman8368
    @thebeardedyorkshireman8368 5 років тому +108

    I’ve had 3 Rolex’s and 2 Omega’s. What I have found is the dealer experience with Rolex is nowhere near as good as Omega. Rolex are up there own arse at the minute, they decide if your worthy where Omega treat you as a valued customer or potential customer. I got better looked after by Patek than Rolex. It’s discrimination.

    • @Craig0935
      @Craig0935 4 роки тому

      Pretty funny. I hear lot's of rumblings about Rolex treating you this way or that way.. never my personal experience. Maybe people are a bit nervous and defensive when they walk in

    • @svfutbol20
      @svfutbol20 3 роки тому +8

      I walked into an Omega boutique in full summer music festival gear, obviously looking like a young, broke college student. Everyone in the Chicago boutique was unbelievably nice and let me check out whatever I wanted. That experience alone helped shape my decision to buy a Seamaster years later.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 3 роки тому

      So let us get this straight are you saying a watch shop that sells both Rolex and Omega are going to treat you differently because you are buying one over the other?

    • @svfutbol20
      @svfutbol20 3 роки тому +7

      @@bighands69 How could you possibly infer that from his comment? He’s obviously talking about ADs that sell one versus the other. Obviously a store that sells both will have the same staff.

    • @CaptCanuck4444
      @CaptCanuck4444 3 роки тому

      Totally agree. Went to an Omega Boutique just down the road from a Rolex AD, and the difference was night and day. Omega all the way. I've visited 5 Rolex ADs in 4 countries, and I've only been impressed with one of them.

  • @mrbud8524
    @mrbud8524 6 років тому +187

    I own both. Omega 42m case size and a see thru case back is a killer of a watch for the price. Also half the price than the mighty Submariner. SEAMASTER is a must buy

    • @Mohammedalyafeimusic
      @Mohammedalyafeimusic 6 років тому +5

      Aftab Husan 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

    • @rafftime9831
      @rafftime9831 5 років тому +2

      Which one do you own and recommend blue or black dial

    • @XFHU
      @XFHU 5 років тому +1

      @@rafftime9831 i got the blue one, but they just published the black ceramic bezel with a white dial just amazing...

    • @mrbud8524
      @mrbud8524 5 років тому

      @@rafftime9831 both are nice l own the blue dail its beautiful and stunning watch

    • @simondouglas3519
      @simondouglas3519 5 років тому

      And a 3rd of the price on grey market! £6k more.. Ridiculous!!

  • @macmac8122
    @macmac8122 6 років тому +192

    Very easy: Omega: technically more advanced (better movement), cheaper (far better value), more modern design, sportier, probably more accurate (?), cheaper to service.

    • @the1916companywatchreviews
      @the1916companywatchreviews  6 років тому +14

      The love for Omega is near unanimous in these comments!
      - WatchBox Team

    • @lukeventers4755
      @lukeventers4755 5 років тому +9

      Not from me, I'd rather have the Rolex. And do. @@the1916companywatchreviews

    • @lukeventers4755
      @lukeventers4755 5 років тому +3

      @@the1916companywatchreviews I subscribed to your channel today. Your diction is world-class. You're a pleasure to listen (to.) One can tell you know what you're talking (about.)
      Cheers, and hello from Polson, MT, USA. Near Glacier National Park.

    • @stockholmpublishings2937
      @stockholmpublishings2937 5 років тому +3

      It's ugly. Ok. I'd like to see how you dress.

    • @robertn3121
      @robertn3121 5 років тому +6

      I agree with Guitar. I own each which are both fine watches. My Sub has added almost 33%in value and my Omega dropped 25%the ,omens I left the AD. It certainly seems as if many viewers are trashing the Sub either because they can’t afford one or can’t get one. Understood. The Omega is a great watch and easy to buy/afford, but the Sub is iconic for a reason.

  • @JarvisMod
    @JarvisMod 5 років тому +71

    Picked up this omega today. My first high end watch. Been saving for a very long time.
    On the way out i spotted an iwc387903 and tried it on.
    I loved it and i gotta say it looks soo much better in person. Photos make it look kind of dull in my opinion but wow it was incredible.
    Im new to this watch world but ive loved and been drawn to watches ever since i was about 6 years old.
    My grandmother used to tell me i used to ask to see everyones watch when i was a little boy.
    Very happy with my purchase

  • @ripperx444
    @ripperx444 6 років тому +139

    Omega all day long. Amazing watch and ..... you can actually buy one lol..

    • @phillippugh2161
      @phillippugh2161 6 років тому +3

      And for half the price

    • @the1916companywatchreviews
      @the1916companywatchreviews  6 років тому +3

      Solid points! Thanks for your input!
      - WatchBox Team

    • @ripperx444
      @ripperx444 6 років тому +5

      WatchBox Reviews you know I always thought the seamaster is closer to the discontinued 40mm seadweller. Both have the bezel with markings at every minute. Both have helium escape valves. Size is bigger than sub. I also love that Rolex guys still think omega is crap!

    • @mattpeters6224
      @mattpeters6224 5 років тому

      $9500 with box and papers all day long. How many do you need?

    • @ripperx444
      @ripperx444 5 років тому +10

      Matt Peters I don't need any. Owned plenty before. They are over priced and can't even be compared to omega at this point unless you only care about brands and what others think!!!
      Also now that the seamaster comes with a WHITE DIAL.... it's a game changer. Best looking diver out there!

  • @mduncan1424
    @mduncan1424 6 років тому +63

    Rolex sub. hasn't changed in too long. That may make it "classic," but by staying still it fell behind. This Omega is impressive on a number of levels. And in person, it looks even better.

    • @mattpeters6224
      @mattpeters6224 5 років тому +1

      I believe some updates have been made with the Ceramic version. Goodness.

    • @RB-xv4si
      @RB-xv4si 5 років тому +2

      Sub has used the same movement for over 30 years. Most of the other Rolex sports watches already have the updated 32XX series movements. They’re taking so freaking long to drop it in the Sub.

    • @tpsin713
      @tpsin713 2 роки тому

      Yeah man by far the fanboys hold rolex up to a standard that it really doesn't have!!! But this is today's society the hype is real.

  • @Mohammedalyafeimusic
    @Mohammedalyafeimusic 6 років тому +95

    Simply both are known, well recognised watches. However, OMEGA has the upper hand in technology and accuracy, Rolex has resale value. With OMEGA you enjoy every angle of the design but with Rolex you’ll keep thinking why I paid twice the price and don’t have this or that!! During the time of owning the watch you’ll care less about people impression on your Rolex but you’ll enjoy each single moment you look at your OMEGA. The double AR coating in OMEGA is amazing as if there is no glass to stop you looking at the dial and hands beauty. James Bond is wearing OMEGA and that makes you feel safe :p I bought the OMEGA silver dial with blue strap with a big smile to my Rolex friends hahahaha live in the past 😂❤️ love you all

    • @romulus1300
      @romulus1300 5 років тому +9

      Mohammed Alyafei - I totally agree. The wave dial was the selling point for me. I know some people complain about availability, but in Dubai, it’s no issue. I bought the Omega and am not looking back.

    • @ArmandoXGG1
      @ArmandoXGG1 5 років тому +2

      Dwayne Dibley Ian Fleming was the one that mention Rolex in his novels about James Bond. But since all 00 agents came from the SAS, they wear Omega too. It was actually that Barbara Brocolli that choose Omega and make a deal with Hayek. Brocolli think that Rolex was much “common” and the Seamaster looks more “European”.

    • @sunilsanthumayor6683
      @sunilsanthumayor6683 5 років тому

      Mohammed Alyafei Just got mine in Black 😍

    • @Mohammedalyafeimusic
      @Mohammedalyafeimusic 4 роки тому +1

      A. B. Does Rolex lose time “confirmed -2 sec)? Yes. Does Rolex have lower magnetic resistance? Yes. Does Rolex have only 5 positions adjustments? Yes. With OMEGA it’s just “Simply better”.
      Don’t relay on +2/-2 of Rolex nor the 0/+5 of OMEGA, just try it.

    • @Mohammedalyafeimusic
      @Mohammedalyafeimusic 4 роки тому +2

      A. B. I had two Rolex watch that are working crazy.. isn’t this an experience? I also don’t care about misleading information like “superlative chronometer” that Rolex gave it to itself 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @Justinpiano1987
    @Justinpiano1987 6 років тому +28

    Been waiting for this comparison! Thanks Tim!

  • @WorldsWorstFishing
    @WorldsWorstFishing 6 років тому +76

    Omega the new top dog

    • @the1916companywatchreviews
      @the1916companywatchreviews  6 років тому +23

      It's hard to argue otherwise. The pricing is shocking given the features, and Omega's own Planet Ocean seems clumsy by comparison. Rolex had better have a new Sub ready for Basel; I don't expect that this new Omega will cut into Submariner waitlists at dealers, but the existence of a superior Omega Seamaster for a fraction of the price is a public image challenge for Rolex.
      Best,
      Tim

    • @csabah.6251
      @csabah.6251 6 років тому +14

      Omega, all day, every day!

    • @csabah.6251
      @csabah.6251 6 років тому +2

      Thanks for the video Tim. Good stuff as always!

    • @WorldsWorstFishing
      @WorldsWorstFishing 6 років тому +2

      @@the1916companywatchreviews agree man!

    • @macmac8122
      @macmac8122 6 років тому +6

      @@the1916companywatchreviews Can't believe people are waiting for a sub when they can get an Omega and even finer things like JLC und Glashütte Original for less. It just shows that having a lot of money in our society does not mean that one possesses just as much sense/taste/style/intelligence.

  • @EJ4u
    @EJ4u 6 років тому +53

    Omega!! Rolex had its day! They have some nerve holding back inventory, as well as charging insane prices! I had 3 and sold them all!
    I’m buying the Omega 2018 300 diver 🌟

  • @apexhunter109
    @apexhunter109 5 років тому +24

    I've always liked Omega better, Rolex is too plain for me and seems like the watch everyone wants simply because of a name but, that's just my opinion. I also like the history Omega has with the British Navy and SAS as well as the moon landing.

    • @Tonkybro3
      @Tonkybro3 5 років тому +2

      Dont forget the Omega Marine being the world's first dive watch.

    • @Hadzie
      @Hadzie 3 роки тому +1

      Spitfire pilots (and all RAF at that) also wore Omegas in WW2

  • @mindoftribe
    @mindoftribe 5 років тому +72

    Omega. No doubt.

  • @chrislutz5485
    @chrislutz5485 6 років тому +21

    Great video. After I watched this video last month. I went out to an omega dealer in Walnut Creek and picked up a new 300m for 4200 out the door. I am happy every morning when I put on my watch.

    • @Aramis_Production
      @Aramis_Production 5 років тому

      Oj, FFS, you;re just a paid troll. I bet you wear a Casio.

  • @sed6
    @sed6 5 років тому +21

    3:50 My jaw dropped! Important distinction indeed! I thought I wanted a Submariner until I saw that exposed case back. Beautiful!

    • @ogu796
      @ogu796 4 роки тому +2

      @A. B. Both watches are nice. At least I wouldn't mind owning both. One is classier the other sportier. But if you see your watches as an investment the sub (for now) is a better option. Another classy, timeless option as an investment is the speedmaster wich hold it's value pretty good.

    • @benevolentautore4463
      @benevolentautore4463 4 роки тому +1

      @A. B. Subjective.

  • @phillippugh2161
    @phillippugh2161 6 років тому +15

    My local AD said Rolex is indeed holding back production of it's sport steel watches . No problem just offered a seamaster midsize

  • @djk2063
    @djk2063 5 років тому +7

    I bought the Omega Seamaster with the black dial and it's a stunning watch. With regard to the ability of the helium escape valve to be opened underwater, it's purpose I was told is that if you accidentally left the valve open while you were underwater it would not damage the watch. There would be no reason to intentionally open the helium escape valve underwater.

    • @damianfawcett1974
      @damianfawcett1974 4 роки тому

      Good point well made. The HEV is only for saturation diving which is never actually in the water but in a dry chamber. I know pretty much no one will ever unscrew this valve for the right reason but I like how Omega have retained it as their ‘thing’

  • @bobbysebastian3709
    @bobbysebastian3709 6 років тому +25

    I would definitely recommend & vote 🗳 for the omega

  • @jal2550
    @jal2550 6 років тому +17

    Just bought a new omega diver 2018 blue dial a few hours ago. LOVE IT!

    • @algorithm007ify
      @algorithm007ify 6 років тому +3

      Congrats ..

    • @Aramis_Production
      @Aramis_Production 5 років тому

      Yeah, where? You have no video content on your channel. And you're from India.

  • @mudachuka12345
    @mudachuka12345 5 років тому +10

    You have the ability to speak faster than I can think I’ve no idea how you can do that :-)

  • @chelious1973
    @chelious1973 5 років тому +2

    This is the best comparison review on youtube. Has that prize fight vibe. Without the pay per view!
    Good job Tim!

  • @jackylimaiksiang
    @jackylimaiksiang 6 років тому +8

    I own a sub, but I have to give it to Seamaster this time. The bracelet is so awesome. The Seamaster has a much modern look. Time to give credit when due.

  • @DavidDatura
    @DavidDatura 6 років тому +15

    Definitely the best Seamaster diver to date. I just don’t like the continued use of skeletonized hands or the fussily styled bracelet. Very close, but in the end I still think I’d go with the Rolex here.

    • @ralentinovossi8081
      @ralentinovossi8081 6 років тому +3

      Yeah the Omega bracelet makes it look very old-man-like. I'd only get it on a nato.

    • @AR-rk9nn
      @AR-rk9nn 6 років тому +8

      If the 300M didn’t have those signature designs it would look like another submariner clone

    • @algorithm007ify
      @algorithm007ify 6 років тому +2

      @@ralentinovossi8081 get the rubber version then.

    • @danielplainview4778
      @danielplainview4778 6 років тому +1

      None tapered bracelet on the omega is an eyesore

  • @patrick7474
    @patrick7474 5 років тому +23

    Omega: everyday watch, get rough and banged up, no hard feelings.
    Rolex sub: timeless piece, retains or even appreciates in value over time.
    Conclusion: buy both!

    • @neitherlink6612
      @neitherlink6612 5 років тому +4

      Patrick 747 to be honest, if I spend so much money on a steel watch, I’d rather use it every day.

    • @Tonkybro3
      @Tonkybro3 5 років тому

      Best post!!

    • @izzythomas848
      @izzythomas848 5 років тому

      This is a a great point, rather than the futility of arguing over one or the other. I have experience and own both brands. They are both great watches with different vibes and personalities, and can both easily be part of one's watch collection without feeling redundant. Everyone acts like they should make a decision about one or the other, when in reality most watch enthusiasts own multiple luxury watches. Hence, there is no comparison.

  • @ssvs0485
    @ssvs0485 6 років тому +40

    Omega
    Nicer dial.
    Nicer movement.
    Nicer bracelet.
    Nicer finishing
    A bezel with markers all the way around. = nicer.
    Lume is just as good.
    Winner Omega!

    • @eliransabak1447
      @eliransabak1447 6 років тому +13

      The omega bracelet looks really ugly

    • @ssvs0485
      @ssvs0485 6 років тому +3

      it's for me fantastic and that’s why we have so many choices for so many. For me it’s one of the few I like from the big watch names.

    • @rfsghsdjfyfh
      @rfsghsdjfyfh 6 років тому +4

      it's me Agreed, the bracket is ugly and helium escape value looks silly so Rolex wins here for me.

    • @eliransabak1447
      @eliransabak1447 6 років тому +6

      @@rfsghsdjfyfh the Rolex "bubble" above the date ruins it for me as well. Other than that I really like the Rolex look. Too bad it has been overdone by millions of Chinese copies . I went for Seiko because what's the point of getting a Rolex diver if everyone thinks it's a fake

    • @49fiori
      @49fiori 6 років тому

      Bravo!!!

  • @cliveb15
    @cliveb15 6 років тому +17

    Wow, big win for the Omega, I have the Omega and am currently saving for a Hulk, very tight call in my opinion , great video Tim , very interesting 👍⌚️

  • @BenTramer
    @BenTramer 6 років тому +6

    Why is this unlisted?...nice Apocalypse Now reference.
    I wish the SeaMaster wave pattern was smaller/more detailed like 2011 and earlier. Either way gimme the SM Pro...its a better watch money aside but offers more value anyway!

  • @andrewstohr
    @andrewstohr 6 років тому +24

    Does anyone else think the Rolex looks foggy?

    • @duncanleckie5639
      @duncanleckie5639 6 років тому +6

      This is because they infamously refuse to use AR coating on all their watches. Some speculate it’s so the crystal reflects light more to be more bling etc... oh and AR does not age well I have heard

    • @algorithm007ify
      @algorithm007ify 6 років тому +6

      @@duncanleckie5639 I think its for bling factor..unfortunately. Sadly, modern Rolex is now faux luxury as opposed to a well built tool watch.

  • @devinbrown7426
    @devinbrown7426 5 років тому +12

    Real scuba divers have 0 problems with the bezel on the Omega with gloves on 🤷🏽‍♂️.

    • @t28mcd
      @t28mcd 5 років тому +2

      Yeah because they are using a dive computer instead.

    • @devinbrown7426
      @devinbrown7426 5 років тому

      @@t28mcd Valid point 😂

    • @Hadzie
      @Hadzie 3 роки тому +1

      @@t28mcd Exactly, all the watch reviews go on about divers using these but I doubt any real professional or serious divers do

  • @cl4ssic
    @cl4ssic 6 років тому +11

    The logical choice would be the Submariner but i’m so in love with the omega‘s dial... hate the hands on both watches though.

    • @eyeheartsushi2212
      @eyeheartsushi2212 6 років тому

      Classic I feel exactly the same. Perhaps I’ll go with Tudor when the time comes (no pun intended).

    • @Pler1978
      @Pler1978 6 років тому +1

      The Mercedes hands are absolutely hideous on the Rolex...

    • @teamhonn
      @teamhonn 5 років тому +3

      The logical choice is the Omega. The emotional choice would be the Rolex. Given the price difference for the watches.

    • @MKVHD
      @MKVHD 4 роки тому

      The logical choice is OMEGA

  • @benevolentautore4463
    @benevolentautore4463 4 роки тому +4

    There is no way to choose between the two so I choose both, and a Speedmaster just in case I'm not in the mood to wear either of the others. And a Tudor 58.

  • @therichardchannel
    @therichardchannel 5 років тому +6

    That crystal on the omega is beautiful, almost looks like it's not even there. Whole Rolex still has that gross white haze on every single watch.

    • @ronniep9272
      @ronniep9272 3 роки тому

      It is beautiful but the double AR does get scratched.

  • @Thomasc1004
    @Thomasc1004 5 років тому +6

    Traded Submariner in for the Omega Seamaster diver 300 m in blue, steel band and made three times what I paid....got tired of the Sub after 20 years. Love the new Omega.

    • @HankTheTank23
      @HankTheTank23 2 роки тому

      Do you wear your Seamaster with a suit?

  • @metalobliteration
    @metalobliteration 5 років тому +1

    Having just purchased a blue Seamaster, and having gone in to try and purchase a sub. The customer experience is night and day. The Omega associates went out of their way to make every detail perfect, and even celebrated my purchase with complimentary tequila. The Rolex dealer thought there was no way a 24 year old accountant could afford the watch and I could feel they truly disdained my presence there. Plus, I was able to get the Seamaster I wanted right then and there without waiting. You can’t beat timeliness

  • @wiseguy724
    @wiseguy724 6 років тому +24

    I'd take the smooth dial smpc before both of these. Better looking bracelet end link integration/transition, grey bezel numerals, more subtle second markers around the dial circumference, lower pro He valve, applied omega logo instead of painted, it's the winner at under 3k used all day long.

    • @KeithBohling
      @KeithBohling 6 років тому +3

      Wiseguy724 Agreed. The only thing I wish the smooth dial had is the “10” marker on the bezel for nicer balance. But I’ll take the less flashy, slightly smaller, thinner, cheaper, lower profile He valve, less busy dial every time.

  • @rodolfonjaviermelendezhelo6657
    @rodolfonjaviermelendezhelo6657 6 років тому +7

    Definitely from your best videos Tim, very good!

    • @the1916companywatchreviews
      @the1916companywatchreviews  6 років тому +1

      Thank you, Rodolfon! I love both watches, so my enthusiasm for each drove the production of this feature.
      Best,
      Tim

  • @TheAnvil1971
    @TheAnvil1971 5 років тому +7

    I am going for the Seamaster. Modern Design, better technology and I don´t like the Rolex policy.

  • @dpjyule
    @dpjyule 6 років тому +9

    I personally have found Omega to always be more accurate than Rolex. I have bought several new Rolex and several new Omega and Rolex accuracy has always been pretty poor for the money. I think I may be unlucky in this regard as everybody seems to find the Rolex to be another level. Two new Rolex I have bought have also had poorly fitting end links which is very poor QC for the money. I have had no issues whatsoever getting Rolex to repair under warranty - but 2/3 is a bad hit rate. Have never had to take an Omega watch back for anything.
    I have the new Seamaster in blue and after seeing this and looking at the Aqua Terra I personally am dropping out of the Rolex buying game as it is a void price point for me. Omega are now king of this mid priced segment in my mind and JLC, Vacheron and AP are worth the extra over Rolex.

  • @JungleEddie
    @JungleEddie 6 років тому +18

    I like the feel of the Seamaster over the Submariner

  • @Lord-Snowflake
    @Lord-Snowflake 4 роки тому +5

    Yes, the bezel on the Seamaster is hard to get a purchase on, especially with gloves. However, there's the elephant in the room --you don't want the bezel to move once you are underwater,, or you will die--

  • @josepmariaaguascaribot9239
    @josepmariaaguascaribot9239 6 років тому +1

    I've a question : the valve to expel helium gas of the OMEGA model can be opened full time ?

    • @the1916companywatchreviews
      @the1916companywatchreviews  6 років тому +1

      It shouldn't be open full time simply because it becomes more vulnerable to shearing or impact. Best practice is to open the valve only when needed -- exactly like unscrewing the crown of the watch.
      Best,
      Tim

    • @stephens2r338
      @stephens2r338 6 років тому +1

      The helium valve Is only needed if you have finished a deep sea dive lasting weeks and you are now sitting in a decompression chamber bored surrounded by a mixture of helium and oxygen. Totally pointless to almost everyone. That you can open it during the dive is not a feature. It's saying that if it's left open during the dive your watch will still be ok. They fixed a weak point that doesn't exsist on the Rolex.

    • @josepmariaaguascaribot9239
      @josepmariaaguascaribot9239 6 років тому

      @@stephens2r338 : thank you. It was just only curiosity. I think that conceptually is better the SEA DWELLER valve system.
      Thanks again.

    • @stephens2r338
      @stephens2r338 6 років тому +1

      @@josepmariaaguascaribot9239 Your welcome. The point l was trying to make is in the video he calls it a feature. It's not!
      Nobody needs a helium valve. It's as usefull as fitting an alarm on a watch that's designed to be used in the vacuum of space such as the Omega (you won't hear it, so pointless) or making a watch that's water resistant to 1000m. If l was at that depth l would be crushed to the size of a football by the pressure and of corse be dead so pointless. I have a great idea, how about making a watch that's works at -256c then while lm swimming in liquid nitrogen l can still time my lengths.

  • @audiman7716
    @audiman7716 6 років тому +38

    This is why my subc hasn’t been worn since December 13, the day I picked up my new omega Diver. Absolutely love this watch. Running at +.3 sec a day average.

    • @algorithm007ify
      @algorithm007ify 6 років тому +5

      I sold my rolexes because of the SMP...

    • @audiman7716
      @audiman7716 6 років тому +3

      Watch Aficionado I have two subs left. Going to sell them soon. I usually wear even my older SMP 2254 more than them.

  • @menaseven9093
    @menaseven9093 6 років тому +14

    I choose the Omega Seamaster also Tim because the Omega Seamaster case and braccelet design is more modern then the Rolex Submariner classic design. I like the Omega display case back that let the watch owner admire the movement. The Omega Seamaster have the same quality as the Rolex Submariner but cost less.

  • @harry-eto
    @harry-eto 5 років тому

    An easy to turn Bezel is also prone to beeing turned accidentally.

  • @anthonytoner8145
    @anthonytoner8145 4 роки тому

    Both great watches but is the sub 3k better than SMP?

  • @richardbonanno7236
    @richardbonanno7236 6 років тому +19

    Omega all the way. It's been well received from a lot of critics as one of the best release in 2018. I'll be buying one soon.

  • @TruLai
    @TruLai 6 років тому +6

    Both are winners in this comparison. I have small wrists so the Rolex works better for me but both incredible watches. I guess Omega would win solely on availability these days haha.

    • @gpearce11
      @gpearce11 4 роки тому

      In my experience, the lug-to-lug measurement is more important for smaller wrists than the diameter. In this case, both watches are actually almost identical lug-to-lug, as the Omega has shorter lugs with pivoting endlinks, so they should actuall fit about the same in a smaller wrist.

  • @jeremydahm2124
    @jeremydahm2124 4 роки тому +3

    I'm seriously considering putting off the Moonwatch for this even though I have a 1st gen 41mm Bond chronometer. But id get the black so it's ok to own 2 Seamasters right? Pays homage in a confident modern way. Dynamite looking watch.

  • @paula5482
    @paula5482 6 років тому +4

    Nice video. I got the Omega blue dial recently. It is amazing!

  • @sfGiantsboi03
    @sfGiantsboi03 4 роки тому

    Would this omega hold it value or go up?

  • @JackProzac
    @JackProzac 5 років тому +3

    Just got the seamaster 300 blue dial from Govberg and couldn't be happier. It's gorgeous

  • @patriotsfan1236
    @patriotsfan1236 4 роки тому

    8:15 are you sure? I'm pretty sure the sea master is completely in house. I found this statement on omegas website. "Every part of an OMEGA watch is made in Switzerland, which goes far beyond the industry’s required standard".

    • @patriotsfan1236
      @patriotsfan1236 4 роки тому

      if the Rolex is considered all "in house" then so is the omega.

  • @martinnorden3870
    @martinnorden3870 5 років тому +1

    Maybe it's the camera angle but when you do the side on profile the Omega looks slimmer than the Rolex?

  • @JeremiahHartmanPhotography
    @JeremiahHartmanPhotography 4 роки тому

    would it be possible to get a Submariner vs 300m (ref 233 vintage reissue) review?

  • @matthewhill3996
    @matthewhill3996 4 роки тому +2

    I’m one of those watch guys that loves omega. And boast about its availability which is true cause I’m not ale to walk into a Rolex boutique and buy a model that’s semi popular. That’s a bummer....but I also secretly would love to own a Rolex sub. I won’t ever play the game of having to spend $ 20-40 grand on Rolex watches I don’t want, just to get the one I do. I still secretly want one though.
    With that said, I’m close to getting the omega in this video in blue!
    Thanks for the video

  • @merealzab
    @merealzab 4 роки тому +1

    Why does the Sub have no words/writings on the back case? Is there any specific reason behind this?

  • @stevefox8605
    @stevefox8605 4 роки тому +8

    No competition, rolex taking an antique but well made overpriced knife to a gunfight.

  • @benjaminbradshaw3995
    @benjaminbradshaw3995 6 років тому +10

    Gotta be said, the Rolex, albeit a timeless design, looks boring and underwhelming next to the omega. It's omega anyday from me

  • @Pavlis83
    @Pavlis83 5 років тому

    Is there a better watch than omega sp300 in blue color?

  • @MrKevflo
    @MrKevflo 5 років тому +4

    Just got mine on the 3rd March 19. AWESOME

  • @erikkalifornia5182
    @erikkalifornia5182 5 років тому +3

    The Omega certainly looks more appealing when side by side here. Also in terms of bang for your buck, the Omega wins HANDS DOWN. I'm biased because I own the Omega though... The Omega is amazing in person. There are just details you can't appreciate looking at it through a computer monitor. Plus, at the time of this comment, the Omega can be purchased brand new for almost 1/3rd the price. $4250 through jomashop, vs. $12,000 for the Rolex.

  • @bladeknockingon700
    @bladeknockingon700 4 роки тому +2

    Picked mine up yesterday (seamaster) and I love it. Blue rubber strap, grey wave dial. While the sub is a great watch, I love my seamaster as tech wise and looks it suits me better. The sub is a great watch as well, but after trying some on and seeing them in person, seems too common. I like that it's only watch geeks who know what omega watches are and I can wear it without the branding and status that Rolex has. Best purchase and possibly the only watch I wear for a long time.

  • @greycats99
    @greycats99 3 роки тому +1

    I love them BOTH, for different reasons. So I decided to buy the Omega 2 years after I bought my Sub. Never been happier!

  • @cityslickeroutdoors8306
    @cityslickeroutdoors8306 4 роки тому

    You coulda compared the blue 300m to the black sub. This black one is nice tho too. So is the white dial.

  • @TheBarts27
    @TheBarts27 6 років тому +1

    The cyclops is a bit getting used to, but I would buy the Rolex at listprice, but the Omega is tempting.

  • @alexmichael7997
    @alexmichael7997 6 років тому +5

    Agree , Omega is more interesting in every aspect , I like the waves on the dial , the lack of the cyclops eye , beautiful design , more modern than Rolex which seems a little boring and stuck in the past

  • @jorgemunds9171
    @jorgemunds9171 3 роки тому +3

    Always wanted a Breitling when I was a teen... Then a Sub, when I started my trainee...
    Now, I'm adult, team Omega and love my black 2018 SMP 😊💕
    This new dial is awesome 😍

  • @craigrees7939
    @craigrees7939 4 роки тому +2

    Tried on both, in plain steel and two tone... went for the Seamaster in steel and Sedna gold on the bracelet. Felt a lot more ‘special’ and refined to me even after the AD’s attempts to convince me how lucky I should feel to pay more for less with the Rolex. Wasn’t buying it, personally.

  • @VmanStudioz
    @VmanStudioz 3 роки тому

    Hey Tim - Where is that BIG correction for the Nautilus? This video is now two years old and the Nautilus has had quite the run?

  • @mattpeters6224
    @mattpeters6224 4 роки тому

    That which has the most meaning, the root of the issue is what I focus on. Rank ordering. Not “playing” anything. What are your motives?

  • @James-lp2sq
    @James-lp2sq 5 років тому +3

    i am a big fan of the sub but as an Englishman the heritage alone is enough to convince me to buy the omega. I just wish they'd do away with the manual helium escape valve for an automatic like on the ploprof.

    • @AJ-bi6ns
      @AJ-bi6ns 5 років тому

      Scully couldn’t agree more, it’s a wart on an otherwise beautiful watch

  • @rayban8680
    @rayban8680 4 роки тому +1

    Love this guy’s knowledge of watches and the way he describes them. Great videos.

  • @alanl2550
    @alanl2550 6 років тому +8

    LOVE the Omega! No contest between the two now. Plus the Omega has AR coating where the Sub does not.

  • @conradbo1
    @conradbo1 6 років тому +5

    I like the date placement at 6 o clock. It is so much more symmetrical. And the cyclopse on the Rolex is something I am not sure I am a fan of.

  • @sadaka201
    @sadaka201 6 років тому +2

    why is the rolex almost double price? real reasons please (no prestige crap etc.) i am waiting...

    • @algorithm007ify
      @algorithm007ify 6 років тому

      Marketing...

    • @karlomcastro
      @karlomcastro 6 років тому

      Because they can, as simple as that. If it was the other way around, meaning Omega with Rolex's brand equity, surely they will do the same. It's the same with all other luxury items; bags, shoes, cars. Cheers!

    • @sadaka201
      @sadaka201 6 років тому +1

      @@algorithm007ify meaning people pay the Rolex marketing budget. Pretty stupid IMO.
      By the way; the omega is the better looking watch, so it's my choise.

  • @Wvk5zc
    @Wvk5zc 4 роки тому +12

    Omega only need to make it 40mm, then it will sell like hotcakes. Rolex know that

  • @AFH5078
    @AFH5078 6 років тому

    Great review! How would you feel about the new Seamaster compared to a 16622 Rolex Yachtmaster? I've recently decided to buy one of the two but can't for the life of me decide between the more robust movement and newer design of the Omega or the ahead of its time, platinum/rolesium bezel Rolex with the classic 3135.

  • @hadleyderidder4541
    @hadleyderidder4541 5 років тому +1

    The way this guy delivers the information is awesome. Greatcity!

  • @asura2545
    @asura2545 6 років тому +2

    I waited ages for this! Thank you Tim :D

  • @frisbee544
    @frisbee544 5 років тому

    Thanks, Tim, for comparing the two and showing again the Rolex is still the watch to have.

  • @badassbren1
    @badassbren1 6 років тому +10

    Biased as I have just purchased one, the omega price point and quality just beat the Rolex!

  • @GiGi-wg9lq
    @GiGi-wg9lq 5 років тому +2

    People talk about how ugly the helium escape valve is on the Seamaster, but the cyclops on Rolex's are just as ugly.

  • @fugitive88888
    @fugitive88888 6 років тому +18

    omega if it were 40mm would be perfect

  • @narenreddy2329
    @narenreddy2329 6 років тому +4

    Submariner for me. A classic and a sports watch. Multipurpose use. Dont forget the glidelock. Loving my submariner no date.

    • @algorithm007ify
      @algorithm007ify 6 років тому +1

      Most Rolex owners have to keep the faith...Especially since they have invested so much into it. They defend their faith goes deep down inside, they know that it's a bad value proposition. If you want a high end diver, get a Blancpain FF bathyscaph

    • @narenreddy2329
      @narenreddy2329 6 років тому

      @Fernando Guerrero thanks

    • @narenreddy2329
      @narenreddy2329 6 років тому +2

      @@algorithm007ify thanks for your opinion. But rolex appeals to me like none other. The brand is very infectious. Once that bug catches it is very hard to look into other brands.

    • @Aramis_Production
      @Aramis_Production 5 років тому +1

      @Fernando Guerrero I own one here, best Sub.

  • @marceauratard6869
    @marceauratard6869 6 років тому +9

    Glad to see the seamaster take the crown, and it's less than half the price

  • @JamesK1963
    @JamesK1963 6 років тому +4

    I'm probably biased because I have one, but I like the Sub better. I do like the Omega though. I might get one of those too.

    • @algorithm007ify
      @algorithm007ify 6 років тому +1

      and when you do, you may sell your rolexes.. (Like I have).

    • @JamesK1963
      @JamesK1963 6 років тому +1

      @@algorithm007ify NOPE!

    • @algorithm007ify
      @algorithm007ify 6 років тому

      Jim K that’s what I would have said 4 weeks ago

    • @JamesK1963
      @JamesK1963 6 років тому +1

      @@algorithm007ify Not selling any of my Rolexes.

    • @Aramis_Production
      @Aramis_Production 5 років тому

      @@JamesK1963 You will sell the Omega, lol

  • @modty
    @modty 5 років тому +2

    Wow, Thank you very much for the comparison! Although the Sub is the all time dream watch, I like the new Omega Sea Master much more, and was going though the comments expecting the majority will vote for the Sub over the the Sea Master, I was very surprised to see most of the comments are actually seconding my personal opinion and liking the SM more! and for that I thank you again

  • @bloodymarvelous4790
    @bloodymarvelous4790 3 роки тому

    I don't get the Helium escape valve on the Omega. Doesn't the fact that you have to open it manually defeat its purpose? The Helium Escape Valve is there to prevent catastrophic failure during decompression after saturation diving (i.e. living in a hyperbaric chamber). This doesn't occur "under water", but in a decompression chamber, and unscrewing the crown has the same effect. The reason the Helium escape valve is there, is so that you don't need to unscrew the crown, so that it will protect your watch in case you forget to take manual action. On the Sea Dweller, the helium escape valve requires no manual action. It's always fully operational.

  • @f2mel2
    @f2mel2 3 роки тому

    Tried on a Sub at the mall from the 90s. Felt too much like my Seiko diver. Love my Citizen Promaster. Got the Aqua Terra.

  • @danielplainview4778
    @danielplainview4778 6 років тому +1

    Great comparison... the sub looks way more timeless, although the new seamaster is a home run I don’t think it will age the same, a little busy looking

  • @robertspinks835
    @robertspinks835 6 років тому +2

    If you only want one watch buy the sub
    Otherwise the omega a great value choice for a secondary watch not sure you could pull it off as an all rounder

  • @TheRunningManZ
    @TheRunningManZ 6 років тому +4

    The dial on the Omega is really reflective, as in the dial not the crystal. Like annoyingly so I think, i've never noticed that before, maybe the lighting in the vid I guess.
    I really want to like the Omega, take the valve off and I'm a buyer for sure I think. But i'd stick with the sub if I had to pick one, though i'd personally prefer the Hulk. It has more character to me and I love the sunburst green. Im sure it's the boring safe choice but there is something to that heritage and history when you look at a watch like the Sub, I kinda feel like the Seamaster would not feel like a watch for life, but a watch for now only. The sub is a timeless classic that i'd want to keep forever.

  • @77chupito
    @77chupito 3 роки тому

    Omega 300: diver vs Chrono, what's your choise?

  • @romangrom6853
    @romangrom6853 4 роки тому +2

    Omega; improve the bezel movement, improve the date window so we can see the date, change your skeleton hands so we can read time after 20 minutes in darkness. Next we can compare the Seamaster to Rolex Submariner. Then how are we going to deal with the Iconic recognition of the Sub as the most famous diver's watch in the world. Well let's give Omega next 50 years to change the image and see what happens.

  • @Vargadumi
    @Vargadumi 6 років тому

    Hi Tim,
    Nice review as always👍🏻 i hate the helium escape valve but i see your points about the SMP.
    Could you do a Omega Aqua Terra vs. Zenith Defy? Im searching for a non diver on a factory rubber strap with a clasp. Or if you could only tell your idea maybe. Ive already checked Sinn’s website wich i know you like these days...😊

  • @jumboJetPilot
    @jumboJetPilot 6 років тому +2

    I’d like to see you compare a Calibre de Cartier Diver vs. a Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Preferably both with blue dials 🔵🔵 and with bracelets rather than straps. Who knows, maybe even toss a CFB ScubaTec in there too!

  • @jasonamoako9729
    @jasonamoako9729 6 років тому

    Don't like the helium escape valve but I do like the Omega Aqua Terra but very expensive

  • @ArmandoXGG1
    @ArmandoXGG1 5 років тому +4

    OMEGA all the way. I love ROLEX too. Both are “State of Industry”, great calibers, successful design, ageless. I will get the two! 🔥♥️

  • @jackserious3282
    @jackserious3282 6 років тому +2

    You are the BEST! Thank you for this review. I requested it and you delivered. Like always!

  • @totogosu8698
    @totogosu8698 6 років тому +1

    Get both.
    Blue Omega Seamaster 300m for the summer.
    Submariner for the winter.