Gotta love how the centurion driver gets a nice lil sheet of metal , not to protect from the inevitable blast but to kinda just make him forget the ammo is there so he can focus on his tasks lol
I'm fully convinced that the designers of the Soviet carousel autoloader and ammo storage felt that launching the tank's turret a hundred and twenty feet in the air on a catastrophic kill was a feature, not a bug, since if it was done at close enough range there's a chance the turret could possibly land on the enemy tank at high speed. "Since you were such a bad tanker that you ALLOWED yourself to he hit in the vulnerables, we're gonna give you one last chance to serve the Motherland even in death."
Catastrophic fire in soviet tanks is caused by extra amo storage in the turret and all around the tank. That's why crews of T80 and T72 have forbidden the storage of the extra amo in the turret, because is the cause of the 89% of all the catastrofic fires. Is true that the t64 autoloader was a lot more dangerous than the one of the T72, that's why the t64 autoloader was only use by the t64 and T80 that is a upgrade over the t64, the rest of the autoloaders that Rusia have are the horizontal or the one pice amo autoloader.
I feel like the Sherman Calliope should've been on here, a simple artillery shell that lands next to the tank will detonate the rockets or u can be in a hull down position and someone snipes the rockets sticking out
Not that it matters since that much ammo would obliterate everything in a 50 foot radius. Also, the BKAN already dies in one hit from everything since its massive and unarmored. It's a glass cannon, it yeets tanks at a ridiculous rate, and gets wrecked if it gets hit.
@@corneliusmcmuffin3256 For some stupid reason Bandkanon is surprisingly survivable in my experience, most of the frontal hits ricochet from hull (which is modified strv 103 btw) or get stuck in that enormous breach. I assume ppl don't know how to kill it properly since it's fairly new vehicle. 🌚
@@vczs also has a blowout pannel so in case of a fatal ammo hit the explosion blows outwards behind the turret and outside the tank, saving the crew. Meanwhile the russian autoloader is a barbeque if the ammo is hit.
I can't complain given I always used to wonder how tf I was meant to kill the flak with solid shot until I realised that box is a thing and most flak players love exposing it so they can drive away quicker if they miss
I feel like putting T-54 instead of Leo would be funnier since it has ammunition behind it's fuel tank. Leopards were designed as maneuverable long range tanks which explains them lacking armor and havin such ammo placement. I also don't see the issue with Tiger II since hitting it's ammunition is pretty much impossible if you know how to play on it properly.
realistically, the BKAN ammo storage is the safest. the ammunition is in a separate space, and incase of an explosion most of the force is going go go outwards. the crew will get severely injured, but theres a good chance they survive.
If you noticed with the T80s and also other Soviet tanks how the ammo is stored it causes them when hit to instantly explode, theres alot of Syrian war videos where you'll see this immense powerful flame shoot out the top hatch it sometimes launches crew members, but after that initial burst of powerful flames it explodes lol Some people will know what video I'm talking about, it's been around for a few years
Im the only madlad who plays with full ammo. I grinding for them, so i might as well use them ALL. The ammo explosion thing barely happens. Like every 15 matches i get killed by that, cause gaijin thinks that 1 ammo color dark = no dmg. Plus i play IJP tanks and Emperor Hirohito made those shells with his bare hands, so i could pour them all into my enemies throat.
I play like that too. In my eyes, Im dead no matter where I get shot. No point in "surviving" a shot if you end up too crippled to avoid the second. Just send me out in a glorious blast or eat 55 darts of depleted uranium.
Fun fact if you load your tank full with HE the chance off your turret flying off dosent increase i tested it with a friend out of 10 shots Directly hitting ammo only 3 times my turret flowen off 2 times it didnt cook off and rest was just a cook off what makes no sense tnt explodes
@@Zorro9129 I wouldn't have full ammo racks around 6.0 US but I decided to play France and I bring full racks now because: -It takes 10 rounds to kill someone with France low tier tanks no matter how good your shot placement is. - You die in one shot regardless of ammo. Generally just not getting shot works really well.
Sun Tzu said: If you place your men upon dying ground from which there is no fleeing and the only means of survival is victory, then your men will fight at their best.
Actually the Centurion one is pretty clever. They put the ammo far in front, beside the driver right under the sloped and better protected area. In a hull down position there is no way that ammo is going to explode unless, you know, you get gaijined.
The bkan1c i a artillery piece it was made for long range combat plus that it was magazine fed, it didn't need to see combat, it just needed to chuck rounds at the assigned coordinates. It was also resupplied with a truck that's on standby. The main objective of the bkan1c was to fire as many shells as possible then move out of the way before it gets shot itself
I was talking about T-80s and T-64s with a friend earlier. The convo can be summed up as laughing at the fact that their ammo racks are a literal wall of death, surrounding the crew.
even with the obvious ammo placement, ppl still shoot the bkan 1c on the hull, then the gunner, then they get gaijin'd 3 times in a row and fail to detonate the ammo. Happens everytime I drive it.
For tiger 2 bring low amounts of ammo so the sides do not have any, and hide your side turret at any cost, plus move your turret cheeks when you are going to be hit. Worked like a charm for me, played hundreds of matches like this.
I get it with Tank destroyers, like they are normally walking AT cannons then actual tanks, they are never actually meant to take fire, but the others.....
Actually the T-80s are pretty good in terms of ammo placement if you take the right number of rounds, I recommend taking 23 rounds max for all Carousel ammo rack type soviet MBTs, this way all random pieces of ammo scattered throughout the tank is removed leaving only the ammo in the carousel itself which recently has become rather cheeky in its ability to tank direct hits
Depending on what round you have, a side shot, even angled- against a Russian tank can kill it, since it's mostly chemical reactive armor instead of the usual front plating. Very useful against a turms if you cant get a shot on the driver optics
America is probably the only ones that realize that putting ammo around the crew is a bad idea and they should make a blowout rack incase the ammunition possibly explodes. At the end of the day Russia still doesn't die from a Ammo rack
Who remembers when the tiger II was historically accurate with the ammo loading in game and you could keep the ammo out of the turret? hate how they nerfed the tiger II by changing the ammo loading
As exposed as the bkan is, it also means the explosion will be farther away from the crew, or just act like a funnel and absolutely blast the crew with hot gas and shrapnel
Its seems like the Bkan 1C designers cold have easily made it one of the safest tanks ever to prevent ammo rack explosions and dropped the ball so hard
Can we update this when we get Modern Russian T-70s. There’s just something about being encircled by tank rounds in all directions that point directly at you.
Most of the British tanks I’ve played have the ammunition touching the front plate 😩 and considering how little armor the have to begin with fighting front faced isn’t even a good plan
Not only that, but the T-64/T-72/T-80's crew also seems to disappear after the ammo does, not to mention that sometimes, the turret just ejects itself from the hull, what gives?
most of these are in not in order or have actual sense. The ones that have their ammunition on top are just artillery tanks and don't have problem in ammo storage since they shouldn't meet the enemy face to face. the problems are the actual medium tanks like the centurion that literally has the ammo on its front, you know, where enemies shoot first..
they really weren't anyworse than the west except for the T-64/T-80 (the T-72's ammo isn't anymore likelyt o be hit than leo 2 or chally 2 irl). [the exception is the abrams, but that is unusually good, being the only tank ever with hull blowout panels. this is the real reason its the best tank in the world]
Bkan tank is a true Swedish tank it looks like straight out of IKEA, you bought the tank and you need to assemble it yourself but it's so complicated so you just gave up
Yeah, playing the Leo 1s annoys the shit out of me with the ammo placement. It's why I usually just stick to the 2A4. Not too powerful, but still fun not getting ammo racked every 5 seconds.
I wish they would add a thing so you could choose where u want to put your ammo would make tank duels a bit more interesting bc thats what most people go for and not only that but something where if it hits part of the ammo say the tip of a solid ap round it wont go off bc it just metal but if it hit the caseing yeah sure
M14 SPAA: lets use out 40mm bofor, high explosive, anti air rounds as armor!
*places ammo boxes AROUND the turret*
you mean m42
and m19
we did a custom and my friend Tiger H1 APCBC round bounced off that ammo box
amx 13 DCA 40 same
ZSU-37-2.
You forgot about Sturmpanzer. It's ammo is stored in a crate on top of the vehicle and can be detonated with a 50 cal.
The end of the 88mm Flakbus as well
Same thing with the flakpanzer 88.
To use the truck, you have to go reverse and expose the ammo box waaaay before your gun pops out of cover
Dont forget the yag-10 (29-k) it gets no armor and 2 ammo boxes at both ends of the truck.
I'm almost certain I've set the ammo off on a sturmpanzer with a 308 from the front before
I was wondering why that thing blew up when I sprayed through the smoke
The funny thing is the ammo placement of the M56 doesn't matter because people just mg you anyways
Ikr
same goes for the t55e1
M56 is literally hell to play I swear
racked by arty
@@paraphidd only if you do it wrong
Gotta love how the centurion driver gets a nice lil sheet of metal , not to protect from the inevitable blast but to kinda just make him forget the ammo is there so he can focus on his tasks lol
Bkan 1C might aswell have a gigantic neon sign saying “Aim Here!” With an arrow pointing at the huge ammo buldge
I mean yeah, but if you're playing the Bkan 1C right you very rarely are dealing with other tanks behind you
OWO notices your ammo bulge
Other great hits include the Matilda Hedgehog & 8.8cm Flak 37 Sfl.
Yeah but you would be surprised how often people bounce off the armour protecting the rack. Bkan is surprisingly survivable at times.
@@TH3C001 i hate this
I'm fully convinced that the designers of the Soviet carousel autoloader and ammo storage felt that launching the tank's turret a hundred and twenty feet in the air on a catastrophic kill was a feature, not a bug, since if it was done at close enough range there's a chance the turret could possibly land on the enemy tank at high speed.
"Since you were such a bad tanker that you ALLOWED yourself to he hit in the vulnerables, we're gonna give you one last chance to serve the Motherland even in death."
i wonder if a turret ever landed on another tank before
@@abandonedaccount123 who needs blowout panel when you've got blowout turret
Catastrophic fire in soviet tanks is caused by extra amo storage in the turret and all around the tank. That's why crews of T80 and T72 have forbidden the storage of the extra amo in the turret, because is the cause of the 89% of all the catastrofic fires. Is true that the t64 autoloader was a lot more dangerous than the one of the T72, that's why the t64 autoloader was only use by the t64 and T80 that is a upgrade over the t64, the rest of the autoloaders that Rusia have are the horizontal or the one pice amo autoloader.
For reference see current conflict
@@metalworker7925 current conflict is mainly incompetence by russian command
I feel like the Sherman Calliope should've been on here, a simple artillery shell that lands next to the tank will detonate the rockets or u can be in a hull down position and someone snipes the rockets sticking out
I was expecting the Calliope to be the last one to be honest.
Man, but those rockets are troll as fuck, they maybe *MAYBE* detonate if you hit them
Yeah... But most of the times for me they're just black... Nothing more.
Same for the Pershing tank with the rockets. Every single time I encounter one I always shoot it's rockets and it always detonates killing the player
You guys can shoot rockets and they detonate?
The M56 has worse problems then the ammo placement
The m56 has 0 armor that players use mgs to kill it
NGL the Bkan ammo is so hard to hit frontally, so the thing ends up being more tanky than it deserves to be.
it also isn't that bad compared to other tanks tbh, the Abrams Leo 2's and Type 90 store their ready ammo in an overhang too.
I've bounced it with DM33 followed by me blowing up.
Because every goddamn shell blows up the breech
Well i shot its ammo rack frontally and i bounced off of the top with 240mm pen aphe
The German Ru-251 has a special place in my heart for having a massive goddamn ammo rack right in front, behind the tinfoil front armor.
And this is how little Timmy learned to not bring full ammo.
BKAN ammo placement is actually the best one, since it let's you fire a 155mm howitzer every few seconds... It's also relatively far from the crew...
Not that it matters since that much ammo would obliterate everything in a 50 foot radius. Also, the BKAN already dies in one hit from everything since its massive and unarmored. It's a glass cannon, it yeets tanks at a ridiculous rate, and gets wrecked if it gets hit.
@@corneliusmcmuffin3256 For some stupid reason Bandkanon is surprisingly survivable in my experience, most of the frontal hits ricochet from hull (which is modified strv 103 btw) or get stuck in that enormous breach. I assume ppl don't know how to kill it properly since it's fairly new vehicle. 🌚
I have an idea, make the "ammo bulge" but have it empty while having the ammo somewhere else.
Bang, extra weight, less zoomy tank
"All warfare is based on deception" - Sun Tzu
@@tinycockjock1967 is it that much extra weight to have a thin, fake metal "ammo" bulge?
@@yoboikamil525 welp, time to use baloons i suppose, _better use than for the birthday stuff_
After one or two encounters, every enemy marksman would know that.
I'm disappointed since there's no M-60. That thing has ammo everywhere when you take full load.
The whole Patton series is a tinderbox in full load
@@andrewzheng4038 more or less, yeah. Abrams is a great improvement.
@@vczs also has a blowout pannel so in case of a fatal ammo hit the explosion blows outwards behind the turret and outside the tank, saving the crew. Meanwhile the russian autoloader is a barbeque if the ammo is hit.
A full load Sherman 75 (with the exception of the RoC M4A1 75 (W) and Jumbo 75) would've also made it onto the list
@@clientcomun1958 “he protec he attac
He have blow out ammo rac”
The flak 88 with the ammo box ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE FUCKING VEHICLE
I can't complain given I always used to wonder how tf I was meant to kill the flak with solid shot until I realised that box is a thing and most flak players love exposing it so they can drive away quicker if they miss
Also if the Italian 90/33 M41M tank destroyer was realistic, it would have had additional shells towed behind it on what amounts to a kiddie kart
Tiger I side racks: Are we a joke to you?
*keeps ammo capacity under 25
*is2 frontally pens you anyway
Bring 0 ammo:
Heat shell to the face
am i allowed to mention the rack located in the front left corner of the tiger 1?
Good ol' moment when I ammorack those Tiger 1, twice
I feel like putting T-54 instead of Leo would be funnier since it has ammunition behind it's fuel tank. Leopards were designed as maneuverable long range tanks which explains them lacking armor and havin such ammo placement. I also don't see the issue with Tiger II since hitting it's ammunition is pretty much impossible if you know how to play on it properly.
That are the old leos. Wait until the new leos come into this game
I wouldnt say hitting the ammo on tiger II is impossible considering its the biggest weak spot.
Something with enough pen can hit your turret ammo racks, and conveniently your turret is your weak spot
@@Future183 what about newer abrams
Aka
After 95
I'd like to know of this legendary playstyle where your giant ammo rack stops being a weakspot in the tiger II 📝
Should have put the Pershings on here, theres a ready rack just right of the mantlet. (if you're looking at the tank)
realistically, the BKAN ammo storage is the safest. the ammunition is in a separate space, and incase of an explosion most of the force is going go go outwards. the crew will get severely injured, but theres a good chance they survive.
you do make a good point, Kurt.
If you noticed with the T80s and also other Soviet tanks how the ammo is stored it causes them when hit to instantly explode, theres alot of Syrian war videos where you'll see this immense powerful flame shoot out the top hatch it sometimes launches crew members, but after that initial burst of powerful flames it explodes lol
Some people will know what video I'm talking about, it's been around for a few years
00:44
This tank : it's self propeller artilery
War thunder player's : used it as tank vs tank combat
Im the only madlad who plays with full ammo. I grinding for them, so i might as well use them ALL.
The ammo explosion thing barely happens. Like every 15 matches i get killed by that, cause gaijin thinks that 1 ammo color dark = no dmg.
Plus i play IJP tanks and Emperor Hirohito made those shells with his bare hands, so i could pour them all into my enemies throat.
A god amongst men, whose only concern is running out of ammo before running out of enemies to shoot.
I play like that too. In my eyes, Im dead no matter where I get shot. No point in "surviving" a shot if you end up too crippled to avoid the second. Just send me out in a glorious blast or eat 55 darts of depleted uranium.
based
and it doesnt even matter, you can get racked with zero ammo
bc gaijin will gaijin
Fun fact if you load your tank full with
HE the chance off your turret flying off dosent increase i tested it with a friend out of 10 shots Directly hitting ammo only 3 times my turret flowen off 2 times it didnt cook off and rest was just a cook off what makes no sense tnt explodes
@@Zorro9129 I wouldn't have full ammo racks around 6.0 US but I decided to play France and I bring full racks now because:
-It takes 10 rounds to kill someone with France low tier tanks no matter how good your shot placement is.
- You die in one shot regardless of ammo.
Generally just not getting shot works really well.
Sun Tzu said: If you place your men upon dying ground from which there is no fleeing and the only means of survival is victory, then your men will fight at their best.
The Ho-Ro, I shit you not, keeps it in a wooden box on the back of the tank.
Same with the Spj-fm/43
M4A1: Finally! A worthy opponent! Our battle shall be leg- *gets turret blown off*
Turret becomes a satellite XD
If you bring 30 rounds or less, it won't be that bad
Actually the Centurion one is pretty clever. They put the ammo far in front, beside the driver right under the sloped and better protected area. In a hull down position there is no way that ammo is going to explode unless, you know, you get gaijined.
*cries in AMX-50*
The bkan1c i a artillery piece it was made for long range combat plus that it was magazine fed, it didn't need to see combat, it just needed to chuck rounds at the assigned coordinates. It was also resupplied with a truck that's on standby. The main objective of the bkan1c was to fire as many shells as possible then move out of the way before it gets shot itself
I was talking about T-80s and T-64s with a friend earlier. The convo can be summed up as laughing at the fact that their ammo racks are a literal wall of death, surrounding the crew.
i dont understand why the Bkan's placement is bad. in reality, its basically a blowout ammo rack and an autoloader i think
even with the obvious ammo placement, ppl still shoot the bkan 1c on the hull, then the gunner, then they get gaijin'd 3 times in a row and fail to detonate the ammo. Happens everytime I drive it.
The music from everwhere at the end of time hits hard.
The most uncanny one shouldve been the caliope m4
Calliope: hold my rocket's
The Pumas wrap the driver on both sides with Ammo + the armor is thin enough to be pennd by .50s
You’d think the ammo door in the Abrams would be a lot thicker than it actually is…
For tiger 2 bring low amounts of ammo so the sides do not have any, and hide your side turret at any cost, plus move your turret cheeks when you are going to be hit. Worked like a charm for me, played hundreds of matches like this.
0:13
The moment u realize Germany Suffer because a lot of reasons (exclude noob players)
I get it with Tank destroyers, like they are normally walking AT cannons then actual tanks, they are never actually meant to take fire, but the others.....
Actually the T-80s are pretty good in terms of ammo placement if you take the right number of rounds, I recommend taking 23 rounds max for all Carousel ammo rack type soviet MBTs, this way all random pieces of ammo scattered throughout the tank is removed leaving only the ammo in the carousel itself which recently has become rather cheeky in its ability to tank direct hits
Depending on what round you have, a side shot, even angled- against a Russian tank can kill it, since it's mostly chemical reactive armor instead of the usual front plating. Very useful against a turms if you cant get a shot on the driver optics
I remember killing some Swedish tabk by literally detonating the round in the breech
America is probably the only ones that realize that putting ammo around the crew is a bad idea and they should make a blowout rack incase the ammunition possibly explodes.
At the end of the day Russia still doesn't die from a Ammo rack
There is a Japanese howitzer that has a box on the back with all the fuses I think
BMP-2M.
The VOG-30grenades atop the turret are modelled ammoracks.
You can machinegun it off
Who remembers when the tiger II was historically accurate with the ammo loading in game and you could keep the ammo out of the turret?
hate how they nerfed the tiger II by changing the ammo loading
Fun fact if you have less ammo loaded some if these storages will be empty
saw Bkan 1c, and hit it with M2A2's m2hb.... got 5 kills from its ammo rack .-.
At least the designers were honest (in terms of design) about what they were prioritizing when making these things.
Seems like a tradeoff between safety and reload speed.
Bkan is a artilary so its not ment to be used in 1 on 1 Combat, their for the autoloader could be placed with the ammo like that
If you take 20ish shots in the king tiger only side shots can detonate it. Honestly probably the best ammo placement before blowout pannels
All you're missing is a giant sign on the side saying: "WARNING: HIGH EXPLOSIVE"
With a 3 second reload rate, that’s why the BCAN-1C is a sleeping giant of a tank in an under appreciated nation
T-80's: I make armor out of shells!
Bkan: I make entire house just for shells!
You're forgetting the M4 Calliope and the Matilda Hedgehog...
God that ammo placement is cursed
As exposed as the bkan is, it also means the explosion will be farther away from the crew, or just act like a funnel and absolutely blast the crew with hot gas and shrapnel
Its seems like the Bkan 1C designers cold have easily made it one of the safest tanks ever to prevent ammo rack explosions and dropped the ball so hard
0:19 - The sturm-s has full automatic reloading)))
Can we update this when we get Modern Russian T-70s.
There’s just something about being encircled by tank rounds in all directions that point directly at you.
Abrams was put where it was with blowout panels so the crew wouldn't die if the ammo exploded
I really did expect to see the Sturer Emil or Nashorn in here since the ammo is behind a large weak plate on both sides.
The 8,8cm flak from the German tech tree has a box full of ammo on the back too
0:37 i really fucking new that one of the soviet tanks will be near the end, even if tanks before had far more worse or the same ammo placement.
SMK though- Its so easy to either die or lose all ammo if they fire from the front. They are 2 stories worth
With the Bkan, I'm fairly sure you are not supposed to be so close to the front line to start with.
Most of the British tanks I’ve played have the ammunition touching the front plate 😩 and considering how little armor the have to begin with fighting front faced isn’t even a good plan
Don't forget the Flak-bus. Ammo in un-armored crates at either end of the vehicle that will always be sticking out if you are shooting at someone.
Yeah, in a wooden crate, even a bumpy road will set it off
Eh, T-80s/72s/64s seem to have ammo that just disappears after being hit.
Not only that, but the T-64/T-72/T-80's crew also seems to disappear after the ammo does, not to mention that sometimes, the turret just ejects itself from the hull, what gives?
@@TR33ZY_CRTM that paragraph just got better as I read lmao
i meam, the scorpions ammo placement is the least of your concerns when driving it XD
most of these are in not in order or have actual sense. The ones that have their ammunition on top are just artillery tanks and don't have problem in ammo storage since they shouldn't meet the enemy face to face. the problems are the actual medium tanks like the centurion that literally has the ammo on its front, you know, where enemies shoot first..
Irl bkan 1c would be pretty good because theyre not near crew and im pretty sure they blow away from the crews direction mostly
What about Type 75 MLRS? It's got the biggest ammunition rack
IS 3 and t-55 glorious ammo placement in the turret, any penning shot will turn them into fireworks
The Tiger 2 and Leopard tanks are literally ASKING to explode.
"If the tank doesnt survive, neither do you!"
You forgot about the m4 tipo where some of the shells violate a crew member.
The M56's ammo storage is as good as it could possibly get on that vehicle it's the most protected thing on it.
Thats why i use only 21 rounds
Even historically, Soviet ammo storage was always a nightmare
they really weren't anyworse than the west except for the T-64/T-80 (the T-72's ammo isn't anymore likelyt o be hit than leo 2 or chally 2 irl). [the exception is the abrams, but that is unusually good, being the only tank ever with hull blowout panels. this is the real reason its the best tank in the world]
*notes down to ensure I blow up every tanks ammo I come across*
ZSU-57-2. It's like they want the crew to get BBQ'd.
The bkan 1c is kinda hard to keep alive. I saw the back of that thing and slapped it with a HEATFS shell once. Popped like a ballon.
i like how the type 75 mlrs isnt on here. literaly 70% ammo but never racks
Leopard 2K: lets protect ammo with fuel tank behind thin armor
You forgot about T-26,T-25 and T-34 Americans tanks with ammo placement in left front side of turrent also ammo at center of tanks
Bkan tank is a true Swedish tank it looks like straight out of IKEA, you bought the tank and you need to assemble it yourself but it's so complicated so you just gave up
With Stalinium, there is no need to be concerned about anything hitting ammunition
In real life every time we the US take out a t72 or a t80 the turrer section always Flys off due to ammo going up
The BMP-3M can be killed by hitting the ammo for the roof mounted grenade launcher. It does more damage to itself than enemy tanks
The Strv 103 has all it's ammo stored in a lower rear compartment that is literally the last thing a round can go through.
It's kind of easy to hit if you know where to aim with apds/apfsds
@@__--_-_-.__---___.__---__- If the tank is not facing you.
@@ZETH_27 no if you shoot the flat spot you can hit the ammo from the front
@@__--_-_-.__---___.__---__- It’d still be the last thing the round goes through.
The t 55a with its ammo in the front surrounded by FUEL TANKS
Yeah, playing the Leo 1s annoys the shit out of me with the ammo placement. It's why I usually just stick to the 2A4. Not too powerful, but still fun not getting ammo racked every 5 seconds.
Every hit in a Tiger 2 gets straight into the ammo.
Sometimes it makes you question what the hell were they thinking when they did this.
The surbaisse should be here. Literally the definition of ammo placement
fv4005, places giant 183mm hesh shells all along sides of paper thin walls the size of a barn
You can say what you want but 75% of the time I shoot at a T80's lower plate it just scratches the ammo and doesn't detonate it
You forgot about flakbus ammo, it is literally put in a box completely exposed
I wish they would add a thing so you could choose where u want to put your ammo would make tank duels a bit more interesting bc thats what most people go for and not only that but something where if it hits part of the ammo say the tip of a solid ap round it wont go off bc it just metal but if it hit the caseing yeah sure