Gun culture 1.0 was where everyone was armed. Gun culture 2.0 was a time where going armed was still common but not ubiquitous and was starting to fade some. Gun culture 3.0 was where going armed was rare and guns were a fringe thing. We are now in gun culture 4.0. I hope that brings us back to gun culture 1.0 again.
Doesn’t quite line up with facts and sounds like a fudd take. Concealed Carry has spiked in the last decade and firearms ownership in general has increased year over year since the AWB sunset in 04.
Kind of interesting how people view history, the Constitution, and the general right to self defense with arms. I hope that we are moving to more respect when it comes to natural rights.
Waiting on Range v Garland 3rd Circuit and the 9th Circuit en banc panel decision on 18 USC 922 g(1) pertaining to nonviolent felons as this affects me directly.
Rights don’t disappear during a state of emergency, in the same way that the constitution does not grant the federal government any extra powers during a state of emergency, beyond those enumerated in the constitution.
Judge selection is another area where the likelihood that Republicans gain a majority in the Senate will limit what Harris can do and give more leeway to Trump -Steve
Title 10 usc 246 The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard. (b) The classes of the militia are- (1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and (2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia. (Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 14, § 311; Pub. L. 85-861, § 1(7), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1439; Pub. L. 103-160, div. A, title V, § 524(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1656; renumbered § 246, Pub. L. 114-328, div. A, title XII, § 1241(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2497.)
It’s unconstitutional that states are currently allowed to have either open carry or concealed carry, but not both as long as they have one. That’s too burdensome on the right. It definitely hinders the exercise of the right. That means it’s an infringement. It’s also unconstitutional that states can still require a carry permit. I feel like Bruen ruled on a point that should have been a moot point, and chose to allow the root infringement to continue. Everyone is so star struck with heller and Bruen, and they ignore the fact that both rulings allow and even support unconstitutional infringements by the government; creating new challenges to the new usurpations they created.
agreed luckily i live in ky were we are permitless open and concelaed carry have to be 21 to conceal and open carry is actually in the state constituion
Unfortunately, what you describe is the natural consequence of having a large and diverse population. Not everyone will see things the way you do. Fortunately, the founding fathers created a way to resolve such disputes.
33:00 on.. You lost me on Trump trying to undo the election. That’s a ridiculous talking point for the left. Has absolutely nothing to do with reality.
What's up, UA-cam? Your overlords don't like the message this vid presents, so you're going to make it skip and hiccup and cough and lock up in hopes folks give up trying to watch it?
Gun culture 1.0 was where everyone was armed. Gun culture 2.0 was a time where going armed was still common but not ubiquitous and was starting to fade some. Gun culture 3.0 was where going armed was rare and guns were a fringe thing. We are now in gun culture 4.0. I hope that brings us back to gun culture 1.0 again.
Doesn’t quite line up with facts and sounds like a fudd take. Concealed Carry has spiked in the last decade and firearms ownership in general has increased year over year since the AWB sunset in 04.
Kind of interesting how people view history, the Constitution, and the general right to self defense with arms. I hope that we are moving to more respect when it comes to natural rights.
Waiting on Range v Garland 3rd Circuit and the 9th Circuit en banc panel decision on 18 USC 922 g(1) pertaining to nonviolent felons as this affects me directly.
That's one of the Second Amendment cases with the best chance of making it up to SCOTUS in the short term -Steve
Rights don’t disappear during a state of emergency, in the same way that the constitution does not grant the federal government any extra powers during a state of emergency, beyond those enumerated in the constitution.
Your name is stupid
2A rights depend extremely on who gets elected next because of judge selection.
No matter whats written down on a sheet of paper, dont give an inch
Judge selection is another area where the likelihood that Republicans gain a majority in the Senate will limit what Harris can do and give more leeway to Trump -Steve
I liked that you greated your viewers with the phrase "ladies and gentlement" instead of the irking term "hi guys". That says something.
We try to keep things classy around here.
Rahimi says only dangerous criminals can be temporarily stripped of 2nd amendment right everyone else can't be banned or stripped of their rights.
@@mccjoe01 18-21 years can't be found to be dangerous so they can't be banned from owning.
@@mccjoe01 so they can't even be temporarily banned from owning
Title 10 usc 246
The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are-
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 14, § 311; Pub. L. 85-861, § 1(7), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1439; Pub. L. 103-160, div. A, title V, § 524(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1656; renumbered § 246, Pub. L. 114-328, div. A, title XII, § 1241(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2497.)
Current law .
Nonviolent convictions decades in the past and still can't own a gun. State and federal pardons are rarely ever granted.
I had no idea that it's approval rating was so high, thank you for the upload y'all.
Thanks for watching!
It’s unconstitutional that states are currently allowed to have either open carry or concealed carry, but not both as long as they have one. That’s too burdensome on the right. It definitely hinders the exercise of the right. That means it’s an infringement. It’s also unconstitutional that states can still require a carry permit. I feel like Bruen ruled on a point that should have been a moot point, and chose to allow the root infringement to continue. Everyone is so star struck with heller and Bruen, and they ignore the fact that both rulings allow and even support unconstitutional infringements by the government; creating new challenges to the new usurpations they created.
agreed luckily i live in ky were we are permitless open and concelaed carry have to be 21 to conceal and open carry is actually in the state constituion
Unfortunately, what you describe is the natural consequence of having a large and diverse population. Not everyone will see things the way you do. Fortunately, the founding fathers created a way to resolve such disputes.
bro ur voice is immaculate
Steve or Jake?
33:00 on.. You lost me on Trump trying to undo the election. That’s a ridiculous talking point for the left. Has absolutely nothing to do with reality.
Of course, it's popular. Bruen is based on the Constitutional principles. Our forefathers were brilliant!!!
What's up, UA-cam? Your overlords don't like the message this vid presents, so you're going to make it skip and hiccup and cough and lock up in hopes folks give up trying to watch it?
Only people who watch too much main stream propaganda think the Supreme Court has been getting less popular.