With markets tumbling, inflation soaring, the Fed imposing large interest-rate hike, while treasury yields are rising rapidly-which means more red ink for portfolios this quarter. How can I profit from the current volatile market, I'm still at a crossroads deciding if to liquidate my $125k bond/stock portfolio.
You should not liquidate your assets, especially during a recession, this is a time for great wealth to be created, if you know what to look for. Pulling all the money out will only allow inflation to eat away at it. There are actually a lot of ways to make high yields in a crisis, but such trades are best done under the supervision of Financial advisor.
Right, I've been in constant touch with a financial-analyst since covid. You know these days it's really easy to buy into trending stock's, but the task is determining when to buy or sell. My advisor decides entry and exit commands on my portfolio, l've accrued over $550k from an initially stagnant reserve of $150K.
Planned retreat can be done passively too. For example, after Hurricane Sandy, homeowners on some of the flooded barrier islands off of New Jersey were offered government buyouts for their wrecked houses. The smart ones took the money and rebuilt inland. Changes to zoning law, tax law, city services and insurance regulations can strongly encourage people to move themselves out of harm's way.
The dumb ones shouldn't even have been given the choice to rebuild in the same location again. Pandering to these idiots whims is holding everyone back.
@@ozymandes Germans want to send them in the eastern part or the nation to rebuilt. What the migrants want is to sit all day in pubs, drinking beer with a top heavy young blonde German gal on their laps... ( Don't we all ? Can you blame them ? )
@@sneckotheveggieavenger9380 not skilled but able bodied worker that want ,can and willing to do the hard labour work that young local wont because they want to do other high skill work
Environmental scientist here. The tipping points have been pushed hard enough by us to become self-sustaining feedback loops. We don't have anything left to do but brace for a crisis on the same scale as Yellowstone. You don't have anywhere to run when the Earth itself becomes your enemy.
There are definitely places that are less exposed to risks associated with climate change. The issue is corrupted institutions in the third world. Money for food, energy, and infrastructure is looted and the people suffer.
So, it stands to reason that only when there are no more humans, there will be peace on Earth. Submit to the Earth, humans. extinguish yourselves. Every single one.
I keep seeing this word 'brace' everywhere. Should I put my head between my knees and sing kumbaya? Exactly how is anyone supposed to 'brace' for imminent civilisational collapse? I've got a better idea. Don't have kids.
We had decades to do something about emissions, I hope the public awareness is now at a point that we don't wait until it's too late with this issue too.
@@cdybft9050 China gets more of its energy from renewables than the USA, China gets 25% of its energy from renewables while the usa is at under 20%. China is going to be exporting the future of electrical production while the USA clings to 19th and 20th century tech.
Its unfair saying this. The average German has a CO2 footprint 50-times as big as the average Congolese, the top 1% of people are responsible for 50% of emissions. Change should start first & foremost with the lifestyles of the developed world. But we know that won’t happen
we need to take a hard look at unsustainable, out of control capitalism. Stop with the delusional psycopathic notion of infinite growth, stop praising countries that grown x% last year.. stop allowing pornographically rich useless leeches to exist and have the power they have
you are an urban dweller and i can smell it from your rhetoric, when you are poor and there are no jobs around because you live in a farm the only way to lift up from poverty is by having more kids and developing a small economy around your household. When your are a city dweller this has the opposite effect and kids become a burden. The best path as i see it is to depopulate farmland, concentrate human activity in as fewer mega cities as possible and produce food the same way Netherlands has done for the last 100 years. 90% of the earth should be out of reach from our hands, making something as small as logging a tree would mean jail time.
True, but less people means less food production, which means less people (vicious circle), and also less younger generation members will be there to care for the elderly.
Population needs to be in balance with jobs, resources, nature and the environment. Having a bigger population in any country than the country can support makes no sense. Access to food, water, shelter, energy and jobs should guide population levels. The worlds population is still expected to add another billion people to feed, clothe and produce pollution. Humans are crowding out all other species of plants and animals. Education and birth control are key to reducing poverty and hunger. Having a child that you can not provide for yourself is cruel and irresponsible. We need solutions not just sympathy. Endless population growth is not sustainable on a finite planet. Every country needs to "TRY" to be more self sufficient. When there are not enough resources to sustain a population something has to give. Countries need to focus on quality of life for their citizens and not just quantity of life for cheap labor. Why import fossil fuels when wind and solar energy can be produced locally and solar energy can power electric vehicles. We need solutions not just sympathy.
@@aci6828 The planet may not be able to survive the additional destruction caused by an additional billion more people needing resources and polluting the planet.WE are destroying the very air, land and water resources we all need to survive. WE are only one species and we are crowding out all other species of plants and animals.
Yes, absolutely, in the aggregate. But the resources to support a population are usually concentrated with a minority, so without redistribution someone struggling with survival will never sacrifice when other live in abundance. That is true on a global level, since the biosphere does not stop at national borders. And it isn’t just having enough resources. Extraction, production, consumption and disposal have wider impacts on everyone, while resource use often depletes finite stocks that was a shared endowment. As I see it the larger the population and greater the speed and intensity of energy and resource use, the more constrained the species is as a whole. Under current conditions, there are two options. Either complete planetary equality around consumption levels of developing countries with central planning to ensure minimum standards are met, and maximum impact is not exceeded. Here a high quality of life could be met through essential public services in a paradigm of private ‘sufficiency’ and public luxury. Or local agrarian economies similar to the 17th century, but hopefully with internet and some essential medical capabilities. Either way, the dream of green capitalism is simply not viable for at least another century or two when population levels come down to within planetary boundaries.
This is a crucial and timely topic that needs to be addressed by all nations. Climate change is causing devastating effects on many communities and it is our responsibility to support and help those who are forced to migrate. The solutions presented in this video are eye-opening and I hope that governments and international organizations will take them into consideration. We all have a role to play in fighting climate change and protecting those affected by it. Thank you for raising awareness on this issue.
How much of the CO2 in the atmosphere is the result of unnecessary manufacturing due to planned? When do you ever hear economists talk about planned obsolescence? The don't even measure and report the annual depreciation of automobiles and other durable consumer garbage.
I find it video's like this one, incredibly important. Showing us how real climate change is, and the suffering that comes with it. Excellent, to the point, compact video. Thank You
If you think it only affects poorer nations, think again! Natural disasters don't pick their locations. I am experiencing this in a first world country! I live in Germany and already lost months of sleep (accumulated in the last 6 years) due to hotter than "usual" summers. Modern apartments are NOT being built with passive house certification, nor basic geothermal cooling. The horrendous housing market isn't making it easier either. It's nearly impossible to find a decent place to live in, let alone ideal place and design. Old buildings are constantly being renovated, but renovation doesn't solve their fundamental design intentions, which were to survive through winters, not summers.
I work in a restaurant in Washington, DC. The entire kitchen are all immigrants from central and south America. I talk to them daily. I have asked them how many came to the US because of climate change? ZERO. They came for money.
Ever heard of anecdotal evidence? Is the people you meet at your work a valid sample of all people around the world? Ask Pakistani, Sub-Saharian, Indian farmers. Ask farmers depending on the Colorado river. Ask Chilean farmers. Look at Argentina news and watch people crying on their starving cattle. Check the increasing prices of coffee and cacao beans. I could look at my yard and say, "nope, that earthquake thing they are telling in the news is false, my house is just fine."
Well, right now climate change is only just starting to have a real effect. So only places like low-lying islands are feeling enough of it right now to have to move. So unless the immigrants you know came from a place like Tangiers Island, I wouldn't expect them to be fleeing climate change right now. But, by around 2050-2070, I'd expect a lot more people to be fleeing climate change, and that's something we have to plan for.
The open border policy that is flooding European and North America with immigrants is NOT caused by climate change. It is a plan and being financed by the UN and other NGO'S. I have spoken to many immigrants to the US and they are getting prepaid credit cards and other government benefits to ENCOURAGE the migration. This is a financial decision and had nothing to do with climate change. It is quite a stretch to blame current migration patterns to what happens in 2070.
It's too late for that. We should have halted gas and oil decades ago, coupled with the whole world going vegan, recycling everything including all plastics etc, and even THEN we'd still have to pull all the excess carbon out of the air as it has a long-term effect just sitting in the atmosphere.
@@francisskyes "Younger Dryas" Did you learn what the Younger Dryas is in school like normal people or did you learn it in a conspiracy theory website/video?
@@soraiya2065 even 1 super rich can not feed 1 billion poor for very long We are now feeding the grand children of the children we did save in the 1980s. They reproduce regardless of their financial situation. It is in their culture: they have 12 children because they know they will loose 9 to war and then they will have 3 left to take care of them in old age. If we save all 12 children, WE CREATE FAMINE.
Hello, I want to translate this video in Korean so that the people in our country are also aware of this issue and are more exposed to this issue in the media. Will I be able to re-upload in my UA-cam account with the translated subtitles?
Give us a break with all these scaring worldwide problems. Europe is full of overpopulation coming from countries not at war. Many countries under development should teached their populations not to have so many children if they can't feed them.
Relocation planning and relocation is one thing - climat change will decimal avaliable agricultural land - the same level question to relocation is certainly food production.
@@oldineamiller9007 no there litterally are the us has thousands of them showing up at it's border every month and it's not just humans entire animal population from central America are moving into the us
Organisations, people and countries are so focused on wealth generation, they throw their money and leverage technology Innovation to create more wealth rather than fix the ecosystems that exist and spend money there. Much like Elon Musk spending money on the Mars mission rather than solve problems here on earth.
You understand that fossil fuels placed satellites into orbit that record the temp of the Earth right? Technology and innovation are what created the modern world. It's the modern world that keeps you safe, and allows us the resources to become increasingly better stewards of the environment.
@@xyeB You arrogantly claim I'm uneducated and yet you don't even understand that satellites are contained inside rockets that are launched into space with fossil fuels, measured in tons. Did you think they used a sling shot? They were also created using fossil fuels. Maybe next time try to generate an actual argument without hurling insults like a child and embarrassing yourself.
We've already hit a tipping point, within the next 5-10 years we will no longer be the #1 cause of temperature increase, and there's not much to stop that process even if we stopped emitting everything today.
It's problematic that the people causing most of the problem (in the north) are not the ones really suffering from the effects. Perhaps more would be done if it was London or New York that were turning inhabitable.
New York City has spent billions of city and county tax dollars on flood control measures and hosting climate change immigrants. This is not a north vs. south problem. You are an example of the "political" opposition that the video refers to as a major problem.
@@trobinson14kc You obviously have no idea of the kind of impact that these changes have in poorer regions of the world if you think New York's problems are anywhere close to the suffering that it causes in developing countries. Just look at the average pollution that someone in the US causes compared to people in poorer countries. Looking at the US energy matrix, it doesn't look like they care too much. Probably not surprising, really, considering there are a lot of people there denying that the problem even exists in the first place.
Not to defend the US, but remember that the per capita pollution for US citizens also includes the pollution done by the US military all around the world. An American could live Amish eating nuts and berries and still have a climate impact greater than citizens of most countries.
@@Zyo117 That is true, the US military consumes more fossil fuels than entire countries. Though to be fair, those numbers for the other countries also include their militaries (obviously much, much smaller). Even if you remove the US military from the actual number (not that you should), it still is many times more than many developing countries, in a per capita basis.
Drive less, fly less, WFH if you can, don't build a house where there was no house before, and make sure your company pays at least 75, 100, or $200 per ton for carbon offsets. Even then you will almost certainly need to increase your income taxes in order to pay for more flood walls, flood barriers across waterways, and floodgates.
Incredible how the Economist can kick off this piece with images from refugee camps that have little to nothing to do with climate change. The majority of poor Africans who are being ravaged by climate change simply cannot afford to leave. Pastoralist communities in the Horn lose virtually all their assets (livestock) during times like now when major droughts strike (sadly, a more frequent occurence now). Those fleeing such places and other areas like north west Africa, really aren’t predominantly ‘climate migrants’ but persecuted people fleeing war, terror, and authoritarian power structures. My bet is we’ll see a whole lot of people from the rich world - California, the Gulf, parts of Europe, and rich coastal cities - really the kind of people with the means and access to migrate - make up the majority of climate migrants. Another stereotype we seriously need to move away from is that Africa cannot possibly be a place of refuge, too
3C is a doom's day scenario for our species even 1.5C will result in over a billion refugees. 3C? We talking about civilization ending event and the racists will use this scenario to rise in power and exterminate nonwhites not to mention the fascists. Corporations are already siding with these fringe groups because they would rather deal with societal collapse than curve their greed.
Yes! Like, I don't know why we're not all on tour around the world for the world. Fresh eyes in a place provides new perspective. I live where I live because it's where I live. I don't travel. I'm not smart or ambitious enough to get invited into a foreign country to do work. Like... it's dumb that we dont use cruise liners for actual transportation.
@@alexm9903 The rich most certainly can fix pollution by paying their taxes and also committing to only use 2 tons of carbon dioxide a year. That still allows them to pollute, but overtime enforces a carbon tax for the richest people who use yachts and private planes. You seem to ignore what is possible and resign to doom humanity in the defense of the rich. Why do that? We know the rich are the problem, why not side against them? Your children and grandchildren will thank you as the future of humanity is all, but doomed if we get to 3C increase by 2100.
Climate change is not an issue for one nation. The world must unit as one force, no matter friends or foes, to take immediate action to settle climate disasters in the world.
It's time for them to stand on their own. There's plenty of money in African countries, their leaders are billionaires. Saying they have had no finger in it is just a lie. And something that's going to shut the eyes of others. Blame game will not work.
Errr.. Communities? I'd talk about moving whole countries. Like Nauru, Bangladesh and so on. We are talking about moving billions, not millions of people in this century. But that af course means that we want to keep them alive. First shots against climate refugees has been shot already in borders like mediterraneian and US south. We are rather building walls (USA, India, Hungary, Finland, ...) or blocking refugees with any means possible, like EU did with Syrian refugees with agreeing Turkey to keep them. The recent refugee crisis was too hard to handle for EU, but that was a minor one when you start to compare it with the ones that are coming because of the climate and ecological crisis. But also keep in mind that even moving to other locations won't always help. Whole mediterraneian is on fire and under heat/drought/floods. Moving from Africa to southern EU won't help much. Even in not that hard hit Scandinavia food crop has vained many years in a row. We should really start planning how to manage incoming population in masses. What happens to a country that currently has 10 million people and there is 50 million people that wants to move there? Even if there is enough land to move, it will change the whole country to something else. And building infrastructure for them, will make huge emissions and environmental impacts that will make things even worse. And ofc economy is altered too. We have already huge opposition that is called rightwing racists, that often are against migration and against scientific facts including manmade climate change. And their numbers will rise when situation worsens. I bet that mass migration that is coming will cause wars. It already has. We are currently at 1,5C (august, 2023). Temporarily, but soon permanently. Climate chaos effects are rising all across the globe.
One must pull the best back to the rural communities. We are only moving them through fractal growth. We are the non governmental non national stage groups all over the Biosphere as an independent non territorial system beholden to only the natural Indigenous resources. Back to the farms we go with technologies emerging and those re emerging We are the Civil Re Engineers that work through back door Channels of the Government’s and Farmers from California to Patagonia. We have done what you are stating already before. Keep moving the Data. MWM
yes i just saw the documentary and i want to know whats the plan right now and i ned to know about the dow jones or nasdaq im not sure if i can film an episode here so let me know what to do. heres an idea lets do heads first apple second and putin last cause it makes no sense to anyone but barak usain bolt who wont exist and thats final jay z.
Como será o segundo êxodo das alterações climáticas ...após o primeiro da globalização e guerras?! Será mais épico e mais mortal?! É um problema enorme ...que agora se está a ser difícil de enfrentar, as pessoas fogem de um lado para não morrer ...e encontram a morte no outro lado!! Um assunto muito importante!! Porque não conseguem resolver com o drama de milhares ...como conseguirão resolver o problema de milhões que são despojados pela alteração da natureza e para a qual contribuímos?!
Wells, water, shade, A/C, battery technology, and hyper optimized food and fertilizer storage logistics.. also, looks like French will become useful agqin if you live in the Eastern Hemisphere. Spanish if you're living in the West. Gotta look this problem in the eye- it'll last for 60 years and will only accelerate. Prepare yesterday.
Can we ask public figures and the middle class to pledge not to take vacations requiring flights? "Alternatively, we could ask climate refugees to pledge to purchase carbon offsets for their travel." Funny that "climate change no vacation" gets 0 hits on UA-cam. The silence speaks volumes about us. (" " = sarcasm)
@@michelledavies2197 No. There are about 600 billionaires in the U.S. They only have 600 butts. Only so many flights can be taken by those butts and only so much waste can come from those butts. Your personal obligation to make thoughtful choices is important; don't pass the buck.
and gibralta wins again not only will it get cooler cause more clouds but also the see gets warmer (this is why their are more coulds) which makes the migrants drown fast
Nobody is fleeing climate or any climate related issues. People are fleeing poverty, persecution and violence. As always. This is not some kind of new phenomenon.
Go vegan. It is the single most important step to do, and the biggest one. UN has been urging us to switch to plant-based from 2006. Animal agriculture is responsible for 14.5-18% of all gas emissions, which makes it responsible for more than the entire transportation system. Animal agriculture uses up to 25% of the entire land in the world (not counting ice covered lands), it is the leading cause of rainforest deforestation (80% of Amazon forests deforestation is due to animal agriculture), water usage, water pollution, species extinction, ocean dead zones etc.
Just so that everyone is absolutely clear here; climate is long-term shifts, and weather is what is going on outside right now. With that out of the way, what the world is going through this year, how winter has all but just skipped us; that is NOT climate change. That is weather. The HungaTonga - Hunga A'apai volcano reupted in January, last year. It was mostly under water, and it had the opposite effect on our atmosphere than what above ground volcanos have. So instead of cooling our atmosphere down, it warmed it up. The moisture and other gases it ejected into our atmosphere, giving a very strong greenhouse effect; allowing light in, but acting as a mirror across the blackness of space. And it is classified as weather because this is not a long-term phenomenon, as it will dissipate over the course of the next year or two. And then we will get back to our regularly scheduled climate change discussion. Sadly, we have to pretty much bury the climate change debate for a bit. We cannot honstly point to what is going on right now and keep brandishing climate change as the cuase, and holding a debate right now about it is equally as useless. All we have is "Yes, but what about after the effects of Hunga Tonga - Hunga A'pai are over?!" And that is not going to work in a debate with people who are already refusing take into account existing evidence. And as to migrants? Well, take them in, give them a place to stay, and open up opportunities for them to find a new path. And as to those who can't? Well, all I have to say is, we are a part of nature, we are merely animals, and when push comes to shove we got to let nature take care of the weak ones. Why bother wasting precious resources trying to help those who *_WILL NOT_* help themselves(even after being educated and informed)? WILL NOT
This is a discussion of disaster relief management and resettlement, from emissions caused by Europe and US legacy emissions from the past century. ‘Combatting’ climate change is another matter. The rich world needs to pay more dollars to move it’s own. Developing nations need fast development and wealth to empower them to activate and finance climate adaptation. This may need allowing Africa and Asia to use fossil fuels, the way we did to get rich.
The problem is that the extraction of hydrogen from water is really energy intensive, and since very few countries have strong renewable energy infrastructure, that extraction is dependent on fossil fuels.
This is the world war we all should fight against than each other.
Let's see what you think when your overrun with refugees
climate refugees will be one of the most hated groups on the planet
With markets tumbling, inflation soaring, the Fed imposing large interest-rate hike, while treasury yields are rising rapidly-which means more red ink for portfolios this quarter. How can I profit from the current volatile market, I'm still at a crossroads deciding if to liquidate my $125k bond/stock portfolio.
You should not liquidate your assets, especially during a recession, this is a time for great wealth to be created, if you know what to look for. Pulling all the money out will only allow inflation to eat away at it. There are actually a lot of ways to make high yields in a crisis, but such trades are best done under the supervision of Financial advisor.
Right, I've been in constant touch with a financial-analyst since covid. You know these days it's really easy to buy into trending stock's, but the task is determining when to buy or sell. My advisor decides entry and exit commands on my portfolio, l've accrued over $550k from an initially stagnant reserve of $150K.
@@badeni_zlsn Please can you leave the info of your investment advisor here? I'm in dire need of one.
Best advice, always pick profitable stock to invest in and get yourself a pro broker to start with.
Connect with her on "INSTAGRAM'.
Planned retreat can be done passively too. For example, after Hurricane Sandy, homeowners on some of the flooded barrier islands off of New Jersey were offered government buyouts for their wrecked houses. The smart ones took the money and rebuilt inland. Changes to zoning law, tax law, city services and insurance regulations can strongly encourage people to move themselves out of harm's way.
The dumb ones shouldn't even have been given the choice to rebuild in the same location again. Pandering to these idiots whims is holding everyone back.
Hurricane Katrina Ian Laura Ida Delta Zeta Harvey Irma Maria Not Sandy
Katrina Is Worse Than Sandy Thanks To Global Warming
Maybe they should never have built there in the first place. 🙄
Generally speaking , there is not enough land in Europe to meet all those people
@@ozymandes it's because rich nations are getting older. They desperately need young skilled migrants. Despite what ultra right populists say.
@@ozymandes Germans want to send them in the eastern part or the nation to rebuilt. What the migrants want is to sit all day in pubs, drinking beer with a top heavy young blonde German gal on their laps...
( Don't we all ? Can you blame them ? )
@@pavelkozlov7163 most climate refugees won't be skilled
@@sneckotheveggieavenger9380 not skilled but able bodied worker that want ,can and willing to do the hard labour work that young local wont because they want to do other high skill work
there's plenty of space in canada though
Environmental scientist here. The tipping points have been pushed hard enough by us to become self-sustaining feedback loops. We don't have anything left to do but brace for a crisis on the same scale as Yellowstone. You don't have anywhere to run when the Earth itself becomes your enemy.
That's a blatant alarmist lie. There isn't and never ever was before a tipping point in the climate science.
There are definitely places that are less exposed to risks associated with climate change.
The issue is corrupted institutions in the third world. Money for food, energy, and infrastructure is looted and the people suffer.
ppft, I wish it was comparable to yellowstone. Methane hydrate released from CO2 induced global warming caused the Permian Extinction.
So, it stands to reason that only when there are no more humans, there will be peace on Earth. Submit to the Earth, humans. extinguish yourselves. Every single one.
I keep seeing this word 'brace' everywhere. Should I put my head between my knees and sing kumbaya? Exactly how is anyone supposed to 'brace' for imminent civilisational collapse?
I've got a better idea. Don't have kids.
750 million people have already started moving. In the next 5-10 years that number will triple.
We had decades to do something about emissions, I hope the public awareness is now at a point that we don't wait until it's too late with this issue too.
Tell China and Latin -America
@@cdybft9050 China gets more of its energy from renewables than the USA, China gets 25% of its energy from renewables while the usa is at under 20%. China is going to be exporting the future of electrical production while the USA clings to 19th and 20th century tech.
@@cdybft9050the US wants to be # 1, until we have to address climate change.
We need to take a hard look at unsustainable, out of control population growth.
A part of the problem sure. However there's more than enough to go around if those in the minority world would consume less.
Its unfair saying this. The average German has a CO2 footprint 50-times as big as the average Congolese, the top 1% of people are responsible for 50% of emissions.
Change should start first & foremost with the lifestyles of the developed world.
But we know that won’t happen
we need to take a hard look at unsustainable, out of control capitalism. Stop with the delusional psycopathic notion of infinite growth, stop praising countries that grown x% last year.. stop allowing pornographically rich useless leeches to exist and have the power they have
Education and birth control are key to reducing poverty and hunger.
Having a child that you can not provide for yourself is cruel and irresponsible.
you are an urban dweller and i can smell it from your rhetoric, when you are poor and there are no jobs around because you live in a farm the only way to lift up from poverty is by having more kids and developing a small economy around your household. When your are a city dweller this has the opposite effect and kids become a burden.
The best path as i see it is to depopulate farmland, concentrate human activity in as fewer mega cities as possible and produce food the same way Netherlands has done for the last 100 years. 90% of the earth should be out of reach from our hands, making something as small as logging a tree would mean jail time.
True, but less people means less food production, which means less people (vicious circle), and also less younger generation members will be there to care for the elderly.
No it's the ultra rich causing the most problems
Population needs to be in balance with jobs, resources, nature and the environment. Having a bigger population in any country than the country can support makes no sense. Access to food, water, shelter, energy and jobs should guide population levels. The worlds population is still expected to add another billion people to feed, clothe and produce pollution. Humans are crowding out all other species of plants and animals. Education and birth control are key to reducing poverty and hunger. Having a child that you can not provide for yourself is cruel and irresponsible. We need solutions not just sympathy. Endless population growth is not sustainable on a finite planet. Every country needs to "TRY" to be more self sufficient. When there are not enough resources to sustain a population something has to give. Countries need to focus on quality of life for their citizens and not just quantity of life for cheap labor. Why import fossil fuels when wind and solar energy can be produced locally and solar energy can power electric vehicles. We need solutions not just sympathy.
This is all true but by 2100 the world population will reach its peak
@@aci6828 The planet may not be able to survive the additional destruction caused by an additional billion more people needing resources and polluting the planet.WE are destroying the very air, land and water resources we all need to survive. WE are only one species and we are crowding out all other species of plants and animals.
try telling any of that to a Muslim in the developing world....
Yes, absolutely, in the aggregate. But the resources to support a population are usually concentrated with a minority, so without redistribution someone struggling with survival will never sacrifice when other live in abundance. That is true on a global level, since the biosphere does not stop at national borders. And it isn’t just having enough resources. Extraction, production, consumption and disposal have wider impacts on everyone, while resource use often depletes finite stocks that was a shared endowment. As I see it the larger the population and greater the speed and intensity of energy and resource use, the more constrained the species is as a whole. Under current conditions, there are two options. Either complete planetary equality around consumption levels of developing countries with central planning to ensure minimum standards are met, and maximum impact is not exceeded. Here a high quality of life could be met through essential public services in a paradigm of private ‘sufficiency’ and public luxury. Or local agrarian economies similar to the 17th century, but hopefully with internet and some essential medical capabilities. Either way, the dream of green capitalism is simply not viable for at least another century or two when population levels come down to within planetary boundaries.
@@Rnankn Humans are crowding out all other species of plants and animals that we need to survive. We are only one part of an ecosystem.
The current population growth is 67 million people per year. It is getting crowded.
It's probably more like 85 million, so you're putting it mildly.
This is a crucial and timely topic that needs to be addressed by all nations. Climate change is causing devastating effects on many communities and it is our responsibility to support and help those who are forced to migrate. The solutions presented in this video are eye-opening and I hope that governments and international organizations will take them into consideration. We all have a role to play in fighting climate change and protecting those affected by it. Thank you for raising awareness on this issue.
100% a bot no human speaks like this
Republicans have been lying intentionally for 40 years.
Do you think they are going to stop Lying about this ?
How much of the CO2 in the atmosphere is the result of unnecessary manufacturing due to planned? When do you ever hear economists talk about planned obsolescence? The don't even measure and report the annual depreciation of automobiles and other durable consumer garbage.
I find it video's like this one, incredibly important. Showing us how real climate change is, and the suffering that comes with it. Excellent, to the point, compact video. Thank You
Let nature take its course
If you think it only affects poorer nations, think again! Natural disasters don't pick their locations. I am experiencing this in a first world country! I live in Germany and already lost months of sleep (accumulated in the last 6 years) due to hotter than "usual" summers. Modern apartments are NOT being built with passive house certification, nor basic geothermal cooling. The horrendous housing market isn't making it easier either. It's nearly impossible to find a decent place to live in, let alone ideal place and design. Old buildings are constantly being renovated, but renovation doesn't solve their fundamental design intentions, which were to survive through winters, not summers.
We'll cross that bridge when we get to it except the bridge will be washed out.
I work in a restaurant in Washington, DC. The entire kitchen are all immigrants from central and south America. I talk to them daily. I have asked them how many came to the US because of climate change? ZERO. They came for money.
Interessante.
Ever heard of anecdotal evidence? Is the people you meet at your work a valid sample of all people around the world?
Ask Pakistani, Sub-Saharian, Indian farmers. Ask farmers depending on the Colorado river. Ask Chilean farmers. Look at Argentina news and watch people crying on their starving cattle. Check the increasing prices of coffee and cacao beans.
I could look at my yard and say, "nope, that earthquake thing they are telling in the news is false, my house is just fine."
inva si v 3 species
Well, right now climate change is only just starting to have a real effect. So only places like low-lying islands are feeling enough of it right now to have to move. So unless the immigrants you know came from a place like Tangiers Island, I wouldn't expect them to be fleeing climate change right now. But, by around 2050-2070, I'd expect a lot more people to be fleeing climate change, and that's something we have to plan for.
The open border policy that is flooding European and North America with immigrants is NOT caused by climate change. It is a plan and being financed by the UN and other NGO'S. I have spoken to many immigrants to the US and they are getting prepaid credit cards and other government benefits to ENCOURAGE the migration. This is a financial decision and had nothing to do with climate change. It is quite a stretch to blame current migration patterns to what happens in 2070.
There is a need of collective efforts to combat climate change
Younger Dryas
It's too late for that. We should have halted gas and oil decades ago, coupled with the whole world going vegan, recycling everything including all plastics etc, and even THEN we'd still have to pull all the excess carbon out of the air as it has a long-term effect just sitting in the atmosphere.
@@francisskyes "Younger Dryas"
Did you learn what the Younger Dryas is in school like normal people or did you learn it in a conspiracy theory website/video?
@@nunofoo8620 I learned that Napoleon was short in school.
Tell that to the greedy rich.
Very ineresting video, The economist should push out more of these so people become aware
Intresting video about the current environmental situation. Thanks for the video👏
Sharing, Justice, and Peace for All - Save Our Planet
Economist Thank You So Much For This Documentary. (Please Save The Earth🙏🙏🙏) (Please Save The People🙏🙏🙏).
Poor countries need more birth control just saying.
Nah
A major cause of the problem is the super rich and wealthy countries. You're looking in the wrong direction.
They need it retro-active from year 1400
Any way...too late now.
Well... let Allah save his people.
@@soraiya2065 even 1 super rich can not feed 1 billion poor for very long
We are now feeding the grand children of the children we did save in the 1980s.
They reproduce regardless of their financial situation. It is in their culture: they have 12 children because they know they will loose 9 to war and then they will have 3 left to take care of them in old age.
If we save all 12 children, WE CREATE FAMINE.
Hopefully, this happens to you and your family . Just saying 😌
This video is giving lot of information about present and future trend of ecomony
Europistan.
Hello, I want to translate this video in Korean so that the people in our country are also aware of this issue and are more exposed to this issue in the media. Will I be able to re-upload in my UA-cam account with the translated subtitles?
Or if you could kindly add Korean subtitles for this video, I will share the link in a blog!
Give us a break with all these scaring worldwide problems. Europe is full of overpopulation coming from countries not at war. Many countries under development should teached their populations not to have so many children if they can't feed them.
Relocation planning and relocation is one thing - climat change will decimal avaliable agricultural land - the same level question to relocation is certainly food production.
The planet earth need to be look after that and need to take it seriously to prevent disaster for thr earth
we need to do something, what’s next? this is a serious issue.
eat the rich they are causing most of the global climate change at this point
No it isn't.
@@oldineamiller9007 no there litterally are the us has thousands of them showing up at it's border every month and it's not just humans entire animal population from central America are moving into the us
@@oldineamiller9007 go educate yourself
@@michelledavies2197
I did. That's why I'm a walking climate wiki now. How about you?
We just need massive population decline, live in a world controlled at a certain population that is more sustainable
au schwitz that doesn't sound quite right.
Will you volunteer ? ? ?
Global Warming and melting of ice, This Will increase water level
The world could not provide some basic food for the poor in this age of abundance, the world will do nothing about climate.
Great reporting.
Organisations, people and countries are so focused on wealth generation, they throw their money and leverage technology Innovation to create more wealth rather than fix the ecosystems that exist and spend money there. Much like Elon Musk spending money on the Mars mission rather than solve problems here on earth.
Exactly
@theeconomicist what number above? And a text to who?
You understand that fossil fuels placed satellites into orbit that record the temp of the Earth right? Technology and innovation are what created the modern world. It's the modern world that keeps you safe, and allows us the resources to become increasingly better stewards of the environment.
@@anthonymorris5084 no are you uneducated? Most people know that satellites use solar panels,no fuel.
@@xyeB You arrogantly claim I'm uneducated and yet you don't even understand that satellites are contained inside rockets that are launched into space with fossil fuels, measured in tons. Did you think they used a sling shot? They were also created using fossil fuels. Maybe next time try to generate an actual argument without hurling insults like a child and embarrassing yourself.
Very informative video, telling us about the present situation, much needed content.
Hello from TÜRKİYE there is all peoples.What can we do it for our world.
we really need to do something regarding climate change, it is getting out of our hand.
We've already hit a tipping point, within the next 5-10 years we will no longer be the #1 cause of temperature increase, and there's not much to stop that process even if we stopped emitting everything today.
It's problematic that the people causing most of the problem (in the north) are not the ones really suffering from the effects. Perhaps more would be done if it was London or New York that were turning inhabitable.
New York City has spent billions of city and county tax dollars on flood control measures and hosting climate change immigrants. This is not a north vs. south problem. You are an example of the "political" opposition that the video refers to as a major problem.
@@trobinson14kc You obviously have no idea of the kind of impact that these changes have in poorer regions of the world if you think New York's problems are anywhere close to the suffering that it causes in developing countries.
Just look at the average pollution that someone in the US causes compared to people in poorer countries. Looking at the US energy matrix, it doesn't look like they care too much. Probably not surprising, really, considering there are a lot of people there denying that the problem even exists in the first place.
Not to defend the US, but remember that the per capita pollution for US citizens also includes the pollution done by the US military all around the world. An American could live Amish eating nuts and berries and still have a climate impact greater than citizens of most countries.
@@Zyo117 That is true, the US military consumes more fossil fuels than entire countries. Though to be fair, those numbers for the other countries also include their militaries (obviously much, much smaller).
Even if you remove the US military from the actual number (not that you should), it still is many times more than many developing countries, in a per capita basis.
@@Zyo117 And the homeless sleeping in tents on the streets of LA - have no money to pay to move others into housing they can't themselves afford.
Nothing until we change our ways! It will only get worse!
Our earth will die. It may not happen later. May not happen now. All we can do right now is prolong the inevitable
Drive less, fly less, WFH if you can, don't build a house where there was no house before, and make sure your company pays at least 75, 100, or $200 per ton for carbon offsets. Even then you will almost certainly need to increase your income taxes in order to pay for more flood walls, flood barriers across waterways, and floodgates.
Tax the rich who have multiple houses, fly private jets and never use public transport these people are the worst.
o y v 3y . Take communism as a solution, g0 y
Incredible how the Economist can kick off this piece with images from refugee camps that have little to nothing to do with climate change. The majority of poor Africans who are being ravaged by climate change simply cannot afford to leave. Pastoralist communities in the Horn lose virtually all their assets (livestock) during times like now when major droughts strike (sadly, a more frequent occurence now). Those fleeing such places and other areas like north west Africa, really aren’t predominantly ‘climate migrants’ but persecuted people fleeing war, terror, and authoritarian power structures. My bet is we’ll see a whole lot of people from the rich world - California, the Gulf, parts of Europe, and rich coastal cities - really the kind of people with the means and access to migrate - make up the majority of climate migrants. Another stereotype we seriously need to move away from is that Africa cannot possibly be a place of refuge, too
3 degree plus is not the worst case scenario, but the expected...
3C is a doom's day scenario for our species even 1.5C will result in over a billion refugees. 3C? We talking about civilization ending event and the racists will use this scenario to rise in power and exterminate nonwhites not to mention the fascists. Corporations are already siding with these fringe groups because they would rather deal with societal collapse than curve their greed.
We can be in the same circumstances in AFRICA and in Kenya.Climate change Action is urgently required
How about governments eliminate pullution so they don’t have to worry about relocating people
We must do something.
Migrants to your house and bedroom then
@@Gudha_Ismintis no thanks
Let's send them all to I sr a 3l
Disaster Risk managemnt.Preparation, Mitigation Measures, Response, Recovery and Rehabilitation.Should be Taken serious
People should be divided to other countries rather than only one
Yes! Like, I don't know why we're not all on tour around the world for the world. Fresh eyes in a place provides new perspective. I live where I live because it's where I live. I don't travel. I'm not smart or ambitious enough to get invited into a foreign country to do work. Like... it's dumb that we dont use cruise liners for actual transportation.
What can be done ???
Build walls !!
Instead of addressing climate change and pollution? Instead of taxing the rich and preparing for climate catastrophe you want a wall? smh
@@jalicea1650 ta ong the rich can’t fix pollution.
Climats is always changing.
And a wall protect From invaders.
@@alexm9903 The rich most certainly can fix pollution by paying their taxes and also committing to only use 2 tons of carbon dioxide a year. That still allows them to pollute, but overtime enforces a carbon tax for the richest people who use yachts and private planes. You seem to ignore what is possible and resign to doom humanity in the defense of the rich. Why do that? We know the rich are the problem, why not side against them? Your children and grandchildren will thank you as the future of humanity is all, but doomed if we get to 3C increase by 2100.
@@jalicea1650 thé riches are NOT the problème.
We are too many on the planet.
Natural selection is the cure.
Authorities should relocate the city to high land
Let’s try PLANNED PARENTHOOD first!
It’s is most definitely happening! The Global Climate Adaptation Catastrophe of enormous Indigenous Opportunity!
Shine Bright!
MWM
Climate change is not an issue for one nation. The world must unit as one force, no matter friends or foes, to take immediate action to settle climate disasters in the world.
Younger Dryas
Tell that to the ultra rich
It's time for them to stand on their own. There's plenty of money in African countries, their leaders are billionaires. Saying they have had no finger in it is just a lie. And something that's going to shut the eyes of others. Blame game will not work.
This issue involves everyone! Important information... people need to be educated
So you call misinformation and blatant lies education now?
The rich need to be educated
Errr.. Communities? I'd talk about moving whole countries. Like Nauru, Bangladesh and so on. We are talking about moving billions, not millions of people in this century. But that af course means that we want to keep them alive. First shots against climate refugees has been shot already in borders like mediterraneian and US south. We are rather building walls (USA, India, Hungary, Finland, ...) or blocking refugees with any means possible, like EU did with Syrian refugees with agreeing Turkey to keep them. The recent refugee crisis was too hard to handle for EU, but that was a minor one when you start to compare it with the ones that are coming because of the climate and ecological crisis.
But also keep in mind that even moving to other locations won't always help. Whole mediterraneian is on fire and under heat/drought/floods. Moving from Africa to southern EU won't help much. Even in not that hard hit Scandinavia food crop has vained many years in a row.
We should really start planning how to manage incoming population in masses. What happens to a country that currently has 10 million people and there is 50 million people that wants to move there? Even if there is enough land to move, it will change the whole country to something else. And building infrastructure for them, will make huge emissions and environmental impacts that will make things even worse. And ofc economy is altered too. We have already huge opposition that is called rightwing racists, that often are against migration and against scientific facts including manmade climate change. And their numbers will rise when situation worsens.
I bet that mass migration that is coming will cause wars. It already has.
We are currently at 1,5C (august, 2023). Temporarily, but soon permanently. Climate chaos effects are rising all across the globe.
Lol
One must pull the best back to the rural communities. We are only moving them through fractal growth.
We are the non governmental non national stage groups all over the Biosphere as an independent non territorial system beholden to only the natural Indigenous resources. Back to the farms we go with technologies emerging and those re emerging
We are the Civil Re Engineers that work through back door Channels of the Government’s and Farmers from California to Patagonia. We have done what you are stating already before. Keep moving the Data. MWM
yes i just saw the documentary and i want to know whats the plan right now and i ned to know about the dow jones or nasdaq im not sure if i can film an episode here so let me know what to do. heres an idea lets do heads first apple second and putin last cause it makes no sense to anyone but barak usain bolt who wont exist and thats final jay z.
Como será o segundo êxodo das alterações climáticas ...após o primeiro da globalização e guerras?! Será mais épico e mais mortal?! É um problema enorme ...que agora se está a ser difícil de enfrentar, as pessoas fogem de um lado para não morrer ...e encontram a morte no outro lado!! Um assunto muito importante!! Porque não conseguem resolver com o drama de milhares ...como conseguirão resolver o problema de milhões que são despojados pela alteração da natureza e para a qual contribuímos?!
Very informative
Lake Turkana in Marsabit county.rising water level has displaced people
Wells, water, shade, A/C, battery technology, and hyper optimized food and fertilizer storage logistics.. also, looks like French will become useful agqin if you live in the Eastern Hemisphere. Spanish if you're living in the West. Gotta look this problem in the eye- it'll last for 60 years and will only accelerate. Prepare yesterday.
I'm going to Lima Peru.
2023(Gregorian) “Respect and dignity.” Furthermore:
5:11 what's that?
What’s next ? Farting neighbors migrants ?
This is how Battlefield 2042 started. And 2042 was a dumpster fire.
The rich doesn't care so long they can keep their money .. shame on them
Cant this be solved?
Can we ask public figures and the middle class to pledge not to take vacations requiring flights? "Alternatively, we could ask climate refugees to pledge to purchase carbon offsets for their travel." Funny that "climate change no vacation" gets 0 hits on UA-cam. The silence speaks volumes about us. (" " = sarcasm)
Can we ask the ultra rich to use public transport instead of their private planes.
@@michelledavies2197 No. There are about 600 billionaires in the U.S. They only have 600 butts. Only so many flights can be taken by those butts and only so much waste can come from those butts. Your personal obligation to make thoughtful choices is important; don't pass the buck.
Sink the boats. Problem solved.
and gibralta wins again not only will it get cooler cause more clouds but also the see gets warmer (this is why their are more coulds) which makes the migrants drown fast
A sinking island nation isn’t going to have a lot of leverage in relocation negotiations.
music is overdone
Very simple. We eat them.
And now we have earthquakes.
3:56- 10:02
found the old constution scratched it off and back in civil form and im taking back china por eor engand cause im confuse like zac from england
Honestly if you really think this will be planned and organised and solved???
Nobody is fleeing climate or any climate related issues. People are fleeing poverty, persecution and violence. As always. This is not some kind of new phenomenon.
Go vegan. It is the single most important step to do, and the biggest one. UN has been urging us to switch to plant-based from 2006. Animal agriculture is responsible for 14.5-18% of all gas emissions, which makes it responsible for more than the entire transportation system.
Animal agriculture uses up to 25% of the entire land in the world (not counting ice covered lands), it is the leading cause of rainforest deforestation (80% of Amazon forests deforestation is due to animal agriculture), water usage, water pollution, species extinction, ocean dead zones etc.
All should go to Europe
Just so that everyone is absolutely clear here; climate is long-term shifts, and weather is what is going on outside right now. With that out of the way, what the world is going through this year, how winter has all but just skipped us; that is NOT climate change. That is weather. The HungaTonga - Hunga A'apai volcano reupted in January, last year. It was mostly under water, and it had the opposite effect on our atmosphere than what above ground volcanos have. So instead of cooling our atmosphere down, it warmed it up. The moisture and other gases it ejected into our atmosphere, giving a very strong greenhouse effect; allowing light in, but acting as a mirror across the blackness of space. And it is classified as weather because this is not a long-term phenomenon, as it will dissipate over the course of the next year or two. And then we will get back to our regularly scheduled climate change discussion. Sadly, we have to pretty much bury the climate change debate for a bit. We cannot honstly point to what is going on right now and keep brandishing climate change as the cuase, and holding a debate right now about it is equally as useless. All we have is "Yes, but what about after the effects of Hunga Tonga - Hunga A'pai are over?!" And that is not going to work in a debate with people who are already refusing take into account existing evidence.
And as to migrants? Well, take them in, give them a place to stay, and open up opportunities for them to find a new path. And as to those who can't? Well, all I have to say is, we are a part of nature, we are merely animals, and when push comes to shove we got to let nature take care of the weak ones.
Why bother wasting precious resources trying to help those who *_WILL NOT_* help themselves(even after being educated and informed)?
WILL NOT
We better learn Esperanto (as the second, third language).
They should learn the language of the country they parasite from
Give them Jobs 🙏🏼
Global warming! Everacge 14 degree celcius in April.. 😒
Why do americans convert everything into rugby fields?
>
4:54 is the warning map. Migrate sooner better than later if you live in red areas, ok, understood.
5:35 worst case scenario
Enough of the disaster music - too loud! And unnecessary, I get that climate change is serious. The music is supposed to make it exciting?
Baker.. Coliseum…..Raider.. Squater.. Field burn back 1.. then 2 ( Silo.. Silo Invader/ destruction.. Refugees… The Biblical Cycle
So irritadet with that "epic" music and theatrical effects. If you want to tell some interesting information, those things are excess
This is a discussion of disaster relief management and resettlement, from emissions caused by Europe and US legacy emissions from the past century. ‘Combatting’ climate change is another matter. The rich world needs to pay more dollars to move it’s own. Developing nations need fast development and wealth to empower them to activate and finance climate adaptation. This may need allowing Africa and Asia to use fossil fuels, the way we did to get rich.
King Charles should look into this
henrik isnt his royal bright ness. its president henrik no mr shoo sho. bloomberg
If there is too much water then convert them to hydrogen fuel and use that energy. Like crude oil, depletion of water so no flood.
The problem is that the extraction of hydrogen from water is really energy intensive, and since very few countries have strong renewable energy infrastructure, that extraction is dependent on fossil fuels.
"Have you tried killing the poor?"
Canada found that also works well for depressed people and disabled veterans!
That's what we are doing now.