You are right. Speaking in public is different when it comes for delivery of justice, that does not reflect what is in public. Brahmin culture is working everywhere.
A person gets chance to become judge once in his life. He should, there fore deliver proper justice to the victims avoiding all pressure . The history recalls every good nd bad
Respected honorable chief justice, now it is very much required to look the situation of West Bengal Judiciary System where many lawyers and few judges are definitely not doing Justice. there is evidence of corruption and common people are not getting Justice at present. judiciary almost under the control of specific political groups and criminals. If such type of Immortal activities by judiciary continue then why scientists and engineers will not follow the same path to safeguard their identity and Society at Large. West Bengal judiciary is totally limping and High Court also partially breakdown. I hope honorable Justice chandrachur will take the appropriate action urgently to save the society and human kind. I am available to provide in-depth evidences based on which I have made the above comments. thanks and God blessed you.
37:08 Number of cases does not mean trust, it means hope, and courts many times shatter that hope by running cases for decades, more people buy lottery tickets than those who file court cases does not mean they all trust that everyone trust lottery, its just hope that they can win, so CJI is just giving twisted example here, same with people who buy train tickets even after accidents happening every day, people using bridges even when they fall every day, its not because of trust, people have no other choice, and many times advocates to earn money tell people to file cases, 99% cases are forever pending
@@gilbertdsouza7752All economic offenders have been bailed out except Kejriwal, he too will get bail sooner or later. Once criminal is out he returns to his old business.
With due respect, He is a TedEx talker, He can lecture for hours but his inaction over the cases of Personal liberty and Fundamental rights is rightly shows that he bent down before the executive. Starting from Babri Masjid case to recent case of Current CM's denying the bail for no reason.
Respected CJI , with humility and folded hands ,we the common citizens pray to your higest chair and you to save the country and its people at large from this unholy alliance of the govt in power before you retire .
Why can't our Indian suprem court pass clear and cogent ruling on every section of criminal laws, which will bind all the lower courts, including High Courts, in delivering judgment and orders. Why do some judges act according to their whims and fancies in the name of facts and circumstances. Favourism is one of the key issue in indian judiciary.
Because the facts and circumstances of each case is different and there is need to apply judicial mind . If there are strict guidelines how can judges/magistrate will apply their judicial mind. And in procedural law procedure is handmaiden of justice not its jealous mistress.
80 % cases facts and circumstances are same except time, place and number of alleged offenders, there is no need to apply judicial mind much except writting a prudent judgment or order in line with Apex court binding ruling on a question of fact and question of law. Let the Apex court clearfy when or when not to apply, then the chances of Favourism can be minimized, and it would also be helpful in speedy disposal of the case. Further, the court may take the help of AI to understand and summarize the entire pleading, including the question of law and question of fact presented before the Hon'ble court to arrive on an judgment or order. These steps probably help in eliminating prejudices or Favourism, even corruption.
@@kader1435 with all due respect to ur view. Ur data of 80% is incorrect. Every case is unique in itself. AI can never take places of judges rather it can assist And applying of judicial mind is sine qua non
CJI should deliver judgements he talks about in the right time and it should be taken to a logical end. His recent judgement on electrol bonds came very late and when it came nothing could be done to the wrongdoers. It only served entertainment value to media and judicial community and the elite educated. Nothing was there in it for the common man
Did he make effort to humanise the monstrous Modi regime through his judgements? THE ANSWER IS NO. Great preacher with little substantial action.Basically he and his team(except the likes of Judge Nagaratna) lacks spine to stand up to the fascist executive of Modi.
Nowadays in Calcutta High Court, all judges are not using live streaming due to some or otter reason(s). Some one need to investigate why such selective for live-streaming and what is the reason(s) behind such selective live broadcasting. Specially few judges’ courtrooms never goes on live-streaming. Thanks.
It takes 15-20 years for justicing. Justice delayed is justice denied. The punishment in terms of fine, is far far less. The actual fees of advocates is not at all a consideration. Lakhs of cases pending, Courts remain closed for yearly vacation. No one wants to find out a way to restrict cases which are without any basis and meant to harass only. Wild card decision was applied once in Assam considering the verdicts of cases of similar nature. Justicing is beyond the means upto upper middle class. Are we heading for judicial anarchy as present practices seem justice unachievable in terms of time and expenditure. Will the new Samhita will be a boon to common man?
CJI doesn't owe an explanation to anyone. Except to give justice based on evidence or law. Expect impartiality in hearing petitions and not taking sides for political parties. But CJI gives to many media interviews
Can the honourable Supreme Court of India by utilizing technology, such as, available artificial intelligence, not be able to conduct a judicial audit of the correctness of the judgments delivered by the lower courts, such as, high courts in India and if necessary, afford complete justice to the party in a particular justice failed matter.
The best example of dehumanising law by judiciary is to progressively misinterpret the urban tenancy laws over 6 decades for the suitability of tenants lobby and convenience of government against the interest of house owners and against all economic principles and practices anywhere in the world under similar demographic challenges.
As a pakistani i am ashmed to confess that our chief justice Qazi Fiaz Isa also belongs to this category of hypocrateswho misuse their authority for their personal advantage and have no respect for justice.
He speaks better than what he decides in the court ,most of his jugment and orders thereof are inconclusive and has not made much impact in the field of law practice
Namaste CJI Chandrachuda sir ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤.. We are great honour of Indian judiciary and Head lordship of Supreme court. Really appreciate your immense involvement every decision.Have a great day.👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍. Please bless our like young tasty boys.... .
If India could have a great persion like DY Chandrachud as Prime Minister of India, it would a blessing. But, do you think that the Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud would ever contest in a General Election. Mr. Jai Shankar never contested in an election. He was picked up be Modi on account of his diplomatic experience in different countries. It would be nice if any winning party in General Election would pick up Mr. DY Chandrachud after his retirement and place him in the position of Prime Minister of India. There is every possibility to contest in any MP Constituency to fulfil the formality within 6 months of taking up the position of PM. BUT will DY Chandrachud ever accept such an offer even if he is preferred for the position of PM. It is unlikely that he will. That is the standard of his credibility. A big salute to our CJI, DY Chandrachud. ❤️🙏🇮🇳❤️
His words have wisdom but sadly his actions in the supreme court is a great let down.
How?
@@aj_wuweiDue to him entire EVM ka rona dhona went in wane.
You are right. Speaking in public is different when it comes for delivery of justice, that does not reflect what is in public. Brahmin culture is working everywhere.
A person gets chance to become judge once in his life. He should, there fore deliver proper justice to the victims avoiding all pressure . The history recalls every good nd bad
Respected honorable chief justice, now it is very much required to look the situation of West Bengal Judiciary System where many lawyers and few judges are definitely not doing Justice.
there is evidence of corruption and common people are not getting Justice at present.
judiciary almost under the control of specific political groups and criminals.
If such type of Immortal activities by judiciary continue then why scientists and engineers will not follow the same path to safeguard their identity and Society at Large. West Bengal judiciary is totally limping and High Court also partially breakdown.
I hope honorable Justice chandrachur will take the appropriate action urgently to save the society and human kind.
I am available to provide in-depth evidences based on which I have made the above comments.
thanks and God blessed you.
Failing to mention it is the judges who also dehumanize the law.
Wakey wakey. Lets talk about incompetency of the judicial system.
Why judgement was not gicen by SC in case of Kejriwalji when the date was fixed. Were they waithing for the CBI to arrest gim again?
🎉👏
It was his lunch time, so he went to england to enjoy lunch
37:08 Number of cases does not mean trust, it means hope, and courts many times shatter that hope by running cases for decades, more people buy lottery tickets than those who file court cases does not mean they all trust that everyone trust lottery, its just hope that they can win, so CJI is just giving twisted example here, same with people who buy train tickets even after accidents happening every day, people using bridges even when they fall every day, its not because of trust, people have no other choice, and many times advocates to earn money tell people to file cases, 99% cases are forever pending
❤
His words are exactly opposite of his actions...
Yes .All corrupt politicians have been bailed except one.He too will get bail sooner or later. 😂
Talks sweet like a religious leader. Our taxed money goes to him to only act strong.
this judge only speaks and does opposite of what he says
😂
You are right. All the scamesters have got bail,except Kejriwal. He too will get bail sooner or later.
COMMITTED JUDICIARY IS THE CURSE OF OUR JUDICIARY.
Biased ???
@@pbghosh5305
Yes
Committed to Gujarat Mafia
@@gilbertdsouza7752Show one example.😊
@@gilbertdsouza7752All economic offenders have been bailed out except Kejriwal, he too will get bail sooner or later. Once criminal is out he returns to his old business.
Talk more and act less.
That's what he is
The way in which anker is sitting in front of Hon'ble chief Justice is highly deplorable....
With due respect, He is a TedEx talker, He can lecture for hours but his inaction over the cases of Personal liberty and Fundamental rights is rightly shows that he bent down before the executive. Starting from Babri Masjid case to recent case of Current CM's denying the bail for no reason.
Respected CJI , with humility and folded hands ,we the common citizens pray to your higest chair and you to save the country and its people at large from this unholy alliance of the govt in power before you retire .
NONSENSE..HE IS JUST PLEASING HIMSELF...I WILL TELL HOW PATHETUC IS JUDICIARY AND SYSTEM IN INDIA
STIP PATRONIZING SELF WOKE GUY
सरजी ,आज सायेद कानून डिकटेट शुनने मे दिलचस्ती राखते है ??
Why can't our Indian suprem court pass clear and cogent ruling on every section of criminal laws, which will bind all the lower courts, including High Courts, in delivering judgment and orders.
Why do some judges act according to their whims and fancies in the name of facts and circumstances.
Favourism is one of the key issue in indian judiciary.
Because the facts and circumstances of each case is different and there is need to apply judicial mind . If there are strict guidelines how can judges/magistrate will apply their judicial mind. And in procedural law procedure is handmaiden of justice not its jealous mistress.
80 % cases facts and circumstances are same except time, place and number of alleged offenders, there is no need to apply judicial mind much except writting a prudent judgment or order in line with Apex court binding ruling on a question of fact and question of law.
Let the Apex court clearfy when or when not to apply, then the chances of Favourism can be minimized, and it would also be helpful in speedy disposal of the case. Further, the court may take the help of AI to understand and summarize the entire pleading, including the question of law and question of fact presented before the Hon'ble court to arrive on an judgment or order.
These steps probably help in eliminating prejudices or Favourism, even corruption.
Ur talking abt AI come and experience district court buddy it's beyond ur imagination..@@kader1435
@@kader1435 with all due respect to ur view. Ur data of 80% is incorrect. Every case is unique in itself. AI can never take places of judges rather it can assist And applying of judicial mind is sine qua non
I have completely lost faith in this Spineless judge. Very very sad
Hindi valo ke liye niche hindi me subtitle bhi chala diya kariye. Is se apne channel ka view badenge or hindi bhashi bhi samjh payenge
They humanise the law and let go the criminals scot free
Humanize the law? It isinhuman in india
CJI should deliver judgements he talks about in the right time and it should be taken to a logical end. His recent judgement on electrol bonds came very late and when it came nothing could be done to the wrongdoers. It only served entertainment value to media and judicial community and the elite educated. Nothing was there in it for the common man
Besides, one issue is left undecided. Whether passing electoral bond through money Bill bypassing the upper house was right or not. It's not decided.
Did he make effort to humanise the monstrous Modi regime through his judgements?
THE ANSWER IS NO.
Great preacher with little substantial action.Basically he and his team(except the likes of Judge Nagaratna) lacks spine to stand up to the fascist executive of Modi.
Nowadays in Calcutta High Court, all judges are not using live streaming due to some or otter reason(s). Some one need to investigate why such selective for live-streaming and what is the reason(s) behind such selective live broadcasting. Specially few judges’ courtrooms never goes on live-streaming. Thanks.
It takes 15-20 years for justicing. Justice delayed is justice denied. The punishment in terms of fine, is far far less. The actual fees of advocates is not at all a consideration. Lakhs of cases pending, Courts remain closed for yearly vacation. No one wants to find out a way to restrict cases which are without any basis and meant to harass only. Wild card decision was applied once in Assam considering the verdicts of cases of similar nature. Justicing is beyond the means upto upper middle class. Are we heading for judicial anarchy as present practices seem justice unachievable in terms of time and expenditure. Will the new Samhita will be a boon to common man?
CJI doesn't owe an explanation to anyone. Except to give justice based on evidence or law. Expect impartiality in hearing petitions and not taking sides for political parties. But CJI gives to many media interviews
Can the honourable Supreme Court of India by utilizing technology, such as, available artificial intelligence, not be able to conduct a judicial audit of the correctness of the judgments delivered by the lower courts, such as, high courts in India and if necessary, afford complete justice to the party in a particular justice failed matter.
The best example of dehumanising law by judiciary is to progressively misinterpret the urban tenancy laws over 6 decades for the suitability of tenants lobby and convenience of government against the interest of house owners and against all economic principles and practices anywhere in the world under similar demographic challenges.
As a pakistani i am ashmed to confess that our chief justice Qazi Fiaz Isa also belongs to this category of hypocrateswho misuse their authority for their personal advantage and have no respect for justice.
He speaks better than what he decides in the court ,most of his jugment and orders thereof are inconclusive and has not made much impact in the field of law practice
Humanities doesn't mean passing the buck.
Your Lordship desperately needs to hear yourself speak while driving towards Tilak Marg.
अदालतों पर शक करने के पर्याय कारण और उदाहरण हैं।
Is the interviewer an dian origin trying very effort fully imitating british diction ,accent.
You are main colprit of my moderland ,your oder on chanda take 8year😂😂😂😂😂😂
Four Chief Justices Sat on it.
@@pbghosh5305 sir it is on the flour of supreme coat ,it should be insured,🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻😃
Very enlightening lecture sir
It's ok nobody is blind so much worst going on in the country and you are doing nothing for the betterment of people
CJI wake up when high court judges are pro a political party.
Namaste CJI Chandrachuda sir ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤.. We are great honour of Indian judiciary and Head lordship of Supreme court. Really appreciate your immense involvement every decision.Have a great day.👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍. Please bless our like young tasty boys....
.
Too long a question
He should be the PM that would be amazing.
He can easily run a stint there, too, as Gogoi is doing.
If India could have a great persion like DY Chandrachud as Prime Minister of India, it would a blessing. But, do you think that the Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud would ever contest in a General Election.
Mr. Jai Shankar never contested in an election. He was picked up be Modi on account of his diplomatic experience in different countries.
It would be nice if any winning party in General Election would pick up Mr. DY Chandrachud after his retirement and place him in the position of Prime Minister of India. There is every possibility to contest in any MP Constituency to fulfil the formality within 6 months of taking up the position of PM.
BUT will DY Chandrachud ever accept such an offer even if he is preferred for the position of PM. It is unlikely that he will.
That is the standard of his credibility.
A big salute to our CJI, DY Chandrachud. ❤️🙏🇮🇳❤️
This is the flavor of the month. Next month something else.
Well explained & expressed the soul of Law.
Preaching and practice is a different.
Hndstnptro🙄
Joker 🤡
But the fact remains if this happens in India ???
It was amazing to listen to Mr Chandrachud n digest the critical analysis. Thank u Law Today.
It's always better to see it happening than listening.
Young generation will make it happening.😊
@@krishnakalidas572 of course, HOPE IS BETTER ALTERNATIVE THAN DESPAIR, Chomsky said in utter hopelessness, though. 👍