Actually the rules state you can’t use Poly if your deck has ways of fusion summoning it’s self . Considering despia field spell , branded in red and the trap card all fusion summon Sam was not allowed to use Poly . Poly is only acceptable if you have a fusion deck and your deck does not have any way of summoning those fusion monsters .
Oh, so he cheated through that too. He also relied on a token generator in an earlier duel despite stating twice in this one that’s not allowed. The flagrant cheating continues.
@@HorizonStronghold was it a token for for the archetype he was playing? Rules only say they can't use spells/traps to summon monsters outside of the archetype. Genuine question since I don't remember
@@artonioo761 It was, so it was technically within the rules. I just find it funny that he reinforces it twice in this video that token generators are just straight up banned when they aren’t. If he abided by the rules he laid out to Seereax in the middle of the duels, he’d have been DQed a while ago.
@@JirenFan123 thats the whole point he didnt have the def boost… because Sam got 2 tax dragons out to punish him before he could set up his board… WOW its like the whole point of yugioh where its who can set up the harder board to break usually wins. 2 tax dragons out before Deus ex got flipped is why Seereax lost, he won because he got that out before the tax dragons could make it too costly for him 2 out of 3 times.
Rule Sam Broke: “If your deck has a Toon monster you cannot play toon support such as toon terror. The exceptions to this is Polymerization in the case your deck has a fusion monster but no archetypal fusion effect” (Running Poly when Despia has Branded in Red and Theater) Rule SeeReax Broke: “Spells/Traps that summon non-archetypal monsters of your type/attribute CANNOT be played, that means no Shade Brigandine in Warrior Decks or One Time Passcode in Cyberse decks.” (Worm Bait doesn’t summon specifically “Krawler” Tokens and are thus non-archetypal) Also: There is no rule anywhere in the rule book that states token-generating cards are not allowed, nor is there a rule that implies it. That would lock decks like Swordsoul from using any of its main deck monsters.
If that “also” were accurate it would mean that Sam cheated HARD to win an earlier duel. He tends to be quite selective with how he applies these “rules”.
i dont get that "Toon Support rule", what if someone gets the toon archetype? Are they only allowed to play the toon monmsters and toon world into the deck?
I'm stupid. I just reread the rule and understood it. The rule only applies when your deck has a single toon monster, like a "TOON Cyber Dragon" in a cyber dragon deck.
honestly i get Seereax using an related token generating card, especially since he needed a monster card of that type already on the field to even use it (in this case, an insect monster). it’s not a generic token creator. So i say it was fair.
honestly the only two things i want more from this series is more balance in decks and more detail in the rulings, feel like they need a judge or something
He’s just bad at the game at this point.. he made the rules and breaks the rules because he has no other way of building his decks. Which is sad considering how long and how much he knows about yugioh
Funny how Seereax playing literal insect support is cheating but Sam is playing 1. Poly for fusion 2. Allure for dark monster 3. EEV for dark 2.5k monsters 4. Few branded cards because they mention despia. For the 4th point I vaguely remember Sam claimed Seereax cheated for playing a monster from different archtype that mentioned cards from the archtype Seereax got for his wheel just like how branded cards mention despia. I don't remember the episode so of anyone else remembers please tell me in the comment.
token summoning spells/traps have never been allowed, this was established early on in the series. only in-archetype token summoning cards are allowed, like in the trickstar episode 1. poly has always been allowed for fusion decks AFAIK, and in other similar series they also have the same rule 2. non-archetypal attribute/type support like allure has always been allowed unless it summons a token, seereax has used the spirit charmer trap (spiritual wind art) in his majespecter deck for example because it mentions WIND 3. EEV seems iffy to me, but i suppose if seereax could play spiritual wind art then EEV is also allowed? 4. if the cards mention despia anywhere, then they are despia support plain and simple. branded and despia have a lot of overlap with their spells/traps because of lore reasons to your point, i dunno but sam will often jokingly say seereax can't do something but seereax usually just ignores him now because he does it so often
Sam also used a token generator a few duels ago despite saying those being banned multiple times in this episode. People tend to blame others the most for what they are most guilty of.
@@smackheadedsqueakyweasel4624 Bro poly is allowed if the deck doesnt have fusion which despja has 3 different cards for. Both EEV and allure are staples. They even fought before about playing staples but now suddenly it's fair because Sam is playing them? To counter your charmer argument, Sam literally filled half of his deck with firefist cards whenever he got beast warrior. Even though they are from different archtype, they are indeed beast warrior support so it's fair. Allure and EEV are generic dark staples and Sam even played light and dark chaos cards. Sam himself said if your deck is only one attribute you can play support for the attribute which Seereax did with magispectre. But despia is a dark fairy and light fiend deck. And Sam played both dark and light support. Tldr: Sam made vague rules on purpose and bends them whenever he needs to. Some of the rules are just BS and make no sense.
@@quackduckquack Fair enough on the poly one, but that only makes it 1 for 1 in terms of Sam and SeeReax using cards they should not have been using, in fact Sam even let him play the Token card after the fact so based upon that I'd say just chill and let him have Poly for these duels. He lost badly anyway! EEV and Allure are not listed on the staple wheel for this series, so I dunno how you can say they're staples. Here are a couple of rules from the site itself that you might want to familiarize yourself with. One in fact directly mentions Allure of Darkness "The ONLY spell/traps allowed are archetypal ones and ONES THAT SUPPORT THE TYPES/ATTRIBUTES INCLUDED WITHIN YOUR ARCHETYPE. Example: *Speedroid Dupligate can be played in any WIND deck, despite having Speedroid in the name because it is GENERIC WIND SUPPORT. *If your deck contains DARK Monsters, you CAN play cards like ALLURE OF DARKNESS since it directly supports DARK Monsters. *You cannot play cards like Trade-In because your deck contains Level 8 Monsters." Nowhere does it say just because you're playing multiple types or archetypes that you can't use external support for both, in fact it speaks of them in plural terms implying that you can. It also does not impose a limit on them, so Sam putting "half his deck" with Fire Fist Spells/Traps is not against the rules either. It might make it predictable like "oh Sam is just putting all these cards in again" but it's not against the rules. Here's the rule that explains why non-archeypal Token generating spells/traps can't be played "Spells/Traps that summon NON-ARCHETYPAL MONSTERS of your type/attribute CANNOT be played, that means no Shade Brigandine in Warrior Decks or One Time Passcode in Cyberse decks." So both Sam and SeeReax broke the rules once in this match, so I say let them both off the hook. If SeeReax actually had issues, he'd bring it up.
So after going through the rules, Sam is right about the Spell Card Worm Bait that SeeReax played. But I did find another rule that was interesting. "If your deck has a Toon monster you cannot play toon support such as toon terror. The exceptions to this is Polymerization in the case your deck has a fusion monster but no archetypal fusion effect" Polymerization can be used when the archetype has no archetypal fusion effects. But wait, the Despia Field Spell has a fusion effect, and so does Branded In Red the Quickplay Spell, and the Trap Branded Banishment, and let's not forget the Effect Monster Blazing Cartesia. Also, I feel like for balancing issues cards like the Virus Trap Cards and the Duality Spell Card are kinda busted to just have even if your archetype can support using them. Virus Traps have effects that can disrupt your opponent similar to other cards that are locked behind the Staple Wheel they spin after a loss, though I understand why it's not in the Staple Wheel because not all archetypes are gonna have Dark monsters so it would be dead in the water when you got something against it's requirements. We'd be having a different conversation if for instance the Virus Trap he had used was Deck Devastation Virus cause that would have completely killed Krawlers given the majority of them have less than 1500 ATK. And a Quickplay card that allows you to Special Summon a Fusion Monster by paying its cost is kinda broken when it can be used to close a game during the Battle Phase to give you an extra attack, but again it would be a poor card for the Staple Wheel cause you need Light or Dark monsters. Also, this is just a me thing but I never considered Blazing Cartesia as a Despia card. I know Granguignol needs her as one of the fusion materials and he lists Despia in his effect but otherwise, I consider her more of an Albaz card since she mentions Fallen of Albaz in her effect, but I digress since Albaz and Despia kinda go hand in hand with their effects supporting one another.
I do agree with the Despia cards and Ploymerization not being needed to fusion in the deck. Sam tries to find ways around his own rules which is dumb but worm bait should've been fine because you need a insect on the field to use the card. It can't even be a stable card because with no insect on the field you can't use the spell and it becomes a dead card. Sam makes these rules but he doesn't know what ever card do. Mostly he tries to make the rules benifit himself.
@@devinb3538 It's funny you mention the Allure of Darkness cause that is also listed in the Wheel rules. "The ONLY spell/traps allowed are archetypal ones and ones that support the types/attributes included within your archetype." "If your deck contains Dark Monsters, you can play cards like Allure Of Darkness since it directly supports Dark Monsters" "You cannot play cards like Trade-In because your deck contains Level 8 Monsters" I know there is a risk/reward to playing Allure if you don't have a Dark monster in hand, but having Allure but not allowing Trade-In is really weird given I would argue Allure is easier and stronger to activate and use since the cost only comes after the cards are drawn, especially in Despia thanks to Tragedy's effect working when sent to either GY or Banished.
@@PandaJerrett16 It really depends on which archetype you get because Allure is perfect for Despia, but not every archetype has a banish effect. Either way, that and Duality are strong in general.
I'm generally not a huge fan of Krawlers but respect that tbey were able to beat a deck that most people would think is superior. Plus Sam's face when he got swarmed and attacked directly was priceless.
I loooove this series, and I think it's way more interesting when the playing field is even like in this video. Sam has such an incredible depth of knowledge for these higher tier decks that it ends up being his biggest advantage. I wish Seereax had the time to really familiarize himself with the decks, so there was more back and forth instead of him losing because he isn't as knowledgeable about operating his archetype. I'm also curious, and maybe this was already answered, but how were the decks graded for the wheel? Is it based on the community full power decks or on the stripped-down archetype versions that they are actually playing?
Honestly the wheel is complete bs, you cam look through videos and see a complete imbalance in every grade. It's the same with the wheel they spin when they lose
they're most likely graded on how well they'd perform pure with no additional support from outside of the archetype, which might be why zoodiac was so low when at full power it's the second best deck in the entirety of yugioh behind full power tearlaments
Sam's rules state that "Only in archetype spells or spells that support the type/attributes of your monsters" can be played, Fusion is a card frame type, not a monster type. The various official Yu-Gi-Oh video games point this out by having an inbuilt search system for extra deck cards which is search by card frames, your options are: normal, effect, spell, trap, Fusion, synchro,xyz and link when using such features. Polymerization should only be usable under Sam's rules if using an elemental hero deck as Elemental Heroes blazeman and woodsman specifically mention it in their effect texts. I mean no ill will I'm just trying to clarify wording and statements used during the course of the video for anyone who may not understand the issues raised by Sam and Seereax.
You should feel lucky that Sam didn't use Branded fusion or Mirror Jade then by that logic. 💀 How the heck is he supposed to summon his boss monsters without polymerization?!
Eh, I feel like Polymerization is more of a grey area at most, a lot of fusion decks don't have an in house fusion and if the archetype is fusion based then Polymerization should be fair play, especially since Terraforming was allowed in decks based around field spells.
@@mrstealcar4702 doesnt his rules have a ruling where u cant use poly if ur deck has inbuilt polys witch despia clearly has and mirror jade is apart of branded so ofc its not gonna be used in despia instant DQ
Y'all always manage to make my day irregardless of who wins ...thanks again for the amazing video Sam, and Reax thanks again for letting Sam post these good videos on your chanel
So, I know I'm incredibly late, but if you are allowed to play poly for a deck archetype that already had a dedicated fusion spell/trap, then you should definitly be allowed to play book of moon for a flip archetype, maybe limit it to 2 or 1 considering the offensive applications, or the card reax was talking about that flips all monsters
Sam not throwing Fallen Albaz in there actually shows he’s trying to go by the rules …, but y’all right it’s not a competition without someone cheating 🤣! The comedy is A+ 🔥
And then he proceeded to throw in every single other branded despia support and poly despite poly only being allowed if the deck doesn’t have any other fusion cards (like branded in red).
@@blazeiken2thank god he’s not a stand up comedian and no one cares about likes on a UA-cam comment lol dude ain’t out here jacking ppl material to get famous lol he might be 13 lol leave him alone 😂
wow Sams face bro when Reax beats him HOW DO I BEAT YOUR MONSTERS I DONT NEED TOO HAHAHAH so funny with Sams face i love this series funniest yugioh series on UA-cam fact
@@aHumanBeing97 It is literally tier 3 on MD meta, and is still topping every tournament and has been ever since its release so yes it is most definitely still meta, theres is no "thinking" if it can be🤣
Well Allure of darkness IS different. Its a drawing card that literally says: "If you don't banish a dark monster your entire hand is banished" while token cards are free. Though i'm curious on how swordsoul would fair with the token generating rule. Unless its an archetype thingy
@@ThePurpleMartinwell by rule he played poly because he's deck is a "fusion deck" by that ruling krawlers are a "flip deck" so seereax should be capable of playing any "flip a monster card". Btw I'm against that rule since it makes some decks on specific tier more busted than others. It should just be only 3 rules 1. Pure archetype 2. Pure element support 3. Pure type support that is not part of another pure archetype deck. For example you can't play fire formation spells if you have a beast warrior deck unless it is under the fire formation archetype. That way cheating would be more controlled, duels would be more creative and fun. (Not saying this series is not fun or creative it just sometimes is not fair in the rules for both, lower tiers Sam had really bad decks because of lack of support and now seereax has gotten really bad decks because of lack of support. If you take the universal support out it balances things).
I agree honestly. Like for example he is using poly and I think It'd be fair if SeeReax could use cards like eclipse or book of Moon. Just keep it strictly to that archetype🤷🏾♂️🫡
Wanna read the rules? A lot of people's complains are just fixed by reading rules The token generation cards are not allowed if outside the archetype. You cannot use, for example, ohoton sanctuary if you got an archetype that is light but is not photon, but if you spinned photon then you can Your point about adventure thus makes no sense kek
no matter how hard they try to make SeeReax the "villain" he just isn't he doesnt have an annoying ass laugh and laugh and call people trash every 5 second when they make 1 mistake
KRAWWWLING, IN YOUR SKINNNNN
Krawling over Sam's monsters
Way to go king!
@Ninpo.lightskin.mode.activatedhe pinned a spoiler warning. I’d argue that’s a better choice.
SAM'S WOUNDS, THEY WILL, NOT HEEEAAAAAAAL!
@@danny18894I read that right when he said it lol
That look of shellshock when Seareax started attacking directly was hilarious.
😯
😵😵😵
Don't you ever get em fucked up again
Bruh Sam’s face was priceless 😂
Really was beautiful, he looked dead inside for a minute.
Seereax singing Linkin Park’s “Crawling” for Krawlers is top tier content.
That was way too fuckin funny
This is the way
Best Opportunity that wasn't wasted
Actually the rules state you can’t use Poly if your deck has ways of fusion summoning it’s self . Considering despia field spell , branded in red and the trap card all fusion summon Sam was not allowed to use Poly . Poly is only acceptable if you have a fusion deck and your deck does not have any way of summoning those fusion monsters .
Oh, so he cheated through that too. He also relied on a token generator in an earlier duel despite stating twice in this one that’s not allowed.
The flagrant cheating continues.
@@HorizonStronghold we out here competing who cheats more lmao
@@HorizonStronghold was it a token for for the archetype he was playing? Rules only say they can't use spells/traps to summon monsters outside of the archetype. Genuine question since I don't remember
@@artonioo761 It was, so it was technically within the rules. I just find it funny that he reinforces it twice in this video that token generators are just straight up banned when they aren’t. If he abided by the rules he laid out to Seereax in the middle of the duels, he’d have been DQed a while ago.
Damn Sam cheated and still lost; can’t use poly
🛡️Spoiler shield 🛡️
Thank you my lord
Actually really helpful.
May your pack openings forever be blessed
Doing gods work soldier
Ty sir
I laughed so loud for “what’s up my Neurogo” 😂 Seereax is something else
Getting Crawlers is a huge W for Seereax
Bro, that's like his deck, massive W
So glad he found one that he knows
It was jokes, plus the linkin park reference
I love how Sam now have PTSD hearing Seereax's "so you cheated?". LMAO
I can’t believe seereax beat the IRS deck with neo man-eater bug, weevil must be real proud of this one😂
sam doesnt know how to play despia i would have won he made soo many misplays
@@medussy_sam won with it on field duel 2
Because Seereax didn't have the def boost in game 2, dummy.
@@JirenFan123 thats the whole point he didnt have the def boost… because Sam got 2 tax dragons out to punish him before he could set up his board… WOW its like the whole point of yugioh where its who can set up the harder board to break usually wins. 2 tax dragons out before Deus ex got flipped is why Seereax lost, he won because he got that out before the tax dragons could make it too costly for him 2 out of 3 times.
@@medussy_ im not.
Rule Sam Broke:
“If your deck has a Toon monster you cannot play toon support such as toon terror. The exceptions to this is Polymerization in the case your deck has a fusion monster but no archetypal fusion effect”
(Running Poly when Despia has Branded in Red and Theater)
Rule SeeReax Broke:
“Spells/Traps that summon non-archetypal monsters of your type/attribute CANNOT be played, that means no Shade Brigandine in Warrior Decks or One Time Passcode in Cyberse decks.”
(Worm Bait doesn’t summon specifically “Krawler” Tokens and are thus non-archetypal)
Also:
There is no rule anywhere in the rule book that states token-generating cards are not allowed, nor is there a rule that implies it. That would lock decks like Swordsoul from using any of its main deck monsters.
thank you someone that actually knows what they're talking about
If that “also” were accurate it would mean that Sam cheated HARD to win an earlier duel. He tends to be quite selective with how he applies these “rules”.
i dont get that "Toon Support rule", what if someone gets the toon archetype? Are they only allowed to play the toon monmsters and toon world into the deck?
I'm stupid. I just reread the rule and understood it. The rule only applies when your deck has a single toon monster, like a "TOON Cyber Dragon" in a cyber dragon deck.
I am sure when he said tokens he was talking about the nonarchetype tokens
Seereax made all the krawler mains so proud.
Sam lectured Serrax on why he can’t play Worm Bait, but he ran Epidemic Virus in his Despia deck 😅
And I could be wrong but I could've sworn I remember Sam using a token card a few weeks ago.
honestly i get Seereax using an related token generating card, especially since he needed a monster card of that type already on the field to even use it (in this case, an insect monster). it’s not a generic token creator. So i say it was fair.
Sam cheating as usual
Didn’t Sam also use duality and cartesia?
And he used branded in red a BRANDED CARD
SeeReax didn't embarrass all five Gem Knight players.
They were already embarrassed.
As one of the five gem-knight players, I agree.
As another one of the 5 gem-knight players, I support my fellow comrade's opinion
@deepsavings3126 I was the sixth gem knight player then they took union carrier from me RIP
You both played a good game but Seereax came through with the Krawlers. Keep doing those push ups Sam
Sam's stunned look of "What just happened to me?" At 19:36 is absolutely KILLING me. 😂
Yep. 😂😂😂😂. That is the best pic of the video LOL
31:00 get ready for not only Sam´s worst and most hilarious attempt at acting but maybe the worst attempt of "baiting" Seereax ever :D
This was one of the best episodes in a long time. It was great getting to see Seereax actually know what his deck did. Good for him getting Krawlers.
Seereax is the main reason i play krawlers. Just by the mention of it i searched it and got super intrigued
19:26 LMFAOOOOOO SAM’S FACE AFTER TAKING DIRECT DAMAGE IS A LITERAL MEME 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Man I'm learning about so many ways to play just by watching this series. This is what I call food for the soul.
That first game Sam looked so lost when reax was attacking him directly 😂
and last game, despair
15:30 "What's up my Neurogo" is actually lit 🤣🤣
I very much enjoy this series. The dynamic between you two is great. Feels like I'm watching (personality wise) Kaiba vs. Jaden.
More like Kaiba vs Chazz😂
@@screamordie1000 CHAZZ! IT! UP! CHAZ! IT! UP!
THAT'S what the dynamic is, you're right!
honestly the only two things i want more from this series is more balance in decks and more detail in the rulings, feel like they need a judge or something
I love this series. Sam might be a villain on his own channel but i think he's great too. Him and Seereax put a smile on my face.
Sam starts every episode explaining why he’s not cheating 😂 .
He was also just flat out wrong. You can only play poly if your deck has no other fusion cards. Despia has 3 different types.
He’s just bad at the game at this point.. he made the rules and breaks the rules because he has no other way of building his decks. Which is sad considering how long and how much he knows about yugioh
And then he cheats anyway.
Yeah he cheats way to much but at this point it's funny
@@HorizonStrongholdI actually didn’t realize the part about it needing to have no other fusion method.
Fun fact: krawler represents the nervous system
I was figuring that. I was getting flashbacks to science class with words like dendrite and glial.
I think most of he yugioh community knows that
it has been in Farfas jeopardy game, Sam answered it
Funny how Seereax playing literal insect support is cheating but Sam is playing
1. Poly for fusion
2. Allure for dark monster
3. EEV for dark 2.5k monsters
4. Few branded cards because they mention despia.
For the 4th point I vaguely remember Sam claimed Seereax cheated for playing a monster from different archtype that mentioned cards from the archtype Seereax got for his wheel just like how branded cards mention despia.
I don't remember the episode so of anyone else remembers please tell me in the comment.
token summoning spells/traps have never been allowed, this was established early on in the series. only in-archetype token summoning cards are allowed, like in the trickstar episode
1. poly has always been allowed for fusion decks AFAIK, and in other similar series they also have the same rule
2. non-archetypal attribute/type support like allure has always been allowed unless it summons a token, seereax has used the spirit charmer trap (spiritual wind art) in his majespecter deck for example because it mentions WIND
3. EEV seems iffy to me, but i suppose if seereax could play spiritual wind art then EEV is also allowed?
4. if the cards mention despia anywhere, then they are despia support plain and simple. branded and despia have a lot of overlap with their spells/traps because of lore reasons
to your point, i dunno but sam will often jokingly say seereax can't do something but seereax usually just ignores him now because he does it so often
Sam also used a token generator a few duels ago despite saying those being banned multiple times in this episode.
People tend to blame others the most for what they are most guilty of.
@@smackheadedsqueakyweasel4624 Bro poly is allowed if the deck doesnt have fusion which despja has 3 different cards for.
Both EEV and allure are staples. They even fought before about playing staples but now suddenly it's fair because Sam is playing them?
To counter your charmer argument, Sam literally filled half of his deck with firefist cards whenever he got beast warrior. Even though they are from different archtype, they are indeed beast warrior support so it's fair. Allure and EEV are generic dark staples and Sam even played light and dark chaos cards.
Sam himself said if your deck is only one attribute you can play support for the attribute which Seereax did with magispectre. But despia is a dark fairy and light fiend deck. And Sam played both dark and light support.
Tldr: Sam made vague rules on purpose and bends them whenever he needs to. Some of the rules are just BS and make no sense.
@@quackduckquack Fair enough on the poly one, but that only makes it 1 for 1 in terms of Sam and SeeReax using cards they should not have been using, in fact Sam even let him play the Token card after the fact so based upon that I'd say just chill and let him have Poly for these duels. He lost badly anyway!
EEV and Allure are not listed on the staple wheel for this series, so I dunno how you can say they're staples.
Here are a couple of rules from the site itself that you might want to familiarize yourself with. One in fact directly mentions Allure of Darkness
"The ONLY spell/traps allowed are archetypal ones and ONES THAT SUPPORT THE TYPES/ATTRIBUTES INCLUDED WITHIN YOUR ARCHETYPE. Example:
*Speedroid Dupligate can be played in any WIND deck, despite having Speedroid in the name because it is GENERIC WIND SUPPORT.
*If your deck contains DARK Monsters, you CAN play cards like ALLURE OF DARKNESS since it directly supports DARK Monsters.
*You cannot play cards like Trade-In because your deck contains Level 8 Monsters."
Nowhere does it say just because you're playing multiple types or archetypes that you can't use external support for both, in fact it speaks of them in plural terms implying that you can. It also does not impose a limit on them, so Sam putting "half his deck" with Fire Fist Spells/Traps is not against the rules either. It might make it predictable like "oh Sam is just putting all these cards in again" but it's not against the rules.
Here's the rule that explains why non-archeypal Token generating spells/traps can't be played
"Spells/Traps that summon NON-ARCHETYPAL MONSTERS of your type/attribute CANNOT be played, that means no Shade Brigandine in Warrior Decks or One Time Passcode in Cyberse decks."
So both Sam and SeeReax broke the rules once in this match, so I say let them both off the hook. If SeeReax actually had issues, he'd bring it up.
Hyped for Krawlers, loving the banter. I like how no matter who is winning, someone is pouty 🤣
So after going through the rules, Sam is right about the Spell Card Worm Bait that SeeReax played. But I did find another rule that was interesting.
"If your deck has a Toon monster you cannot play toon support such as toon terror. The exceptions to this is Polymerization in the case your deck has a fusion monster but no archetypal fusion effect"
Polymerization can be used when the archetype has no archetypal fusion effects. But wait, the Despia Field Spell has a fusion effect, and so does Branded In Red the Quickplay Spell, and the Trap Branded Banishment, and let's not forget the Effect Monster Blazing Cartesia.
Also, I feel like for balancing issues cards like the Virus Trap Cards and the Duality Spell Card are kinda busted to just have even if your archetype can support using them. Virus Traps have effects that can disrupt your opponent similar to other cards that are locked behind the Staple Wheel they spin after a loss, though I understand why it's not in the Staple Wheel because not all archetypes are gonna have Dark monsters so it would be dead in the water when you got something against it's requirements. We'd be having a different conversation if for instance the Virus Trap he had used was Deck Devastation Virus cause that would have completely killed Krawlers given the majority of them have less than 1500 ATK. And a Quickplay card that allows you to Special Summon a Fusion Monster by paying its cost is kinda broken when it can be used to close a game during the Battle Phase to give you an extra attack, but again it would be a poor card for the Staple Wheel cause you need Light or Dark monsters.
Also, this is just a me thing but I never considered Blazing Cartesia as a Despia card. I know Granguignol needs her as one of the fusion materials and he lists Despia in his effect but otherwise, I consider her more of an Albaz card since she mentions Fallen of Albaz in her effect, but I digress since Albaz and Despia kinda go hand in hand with their effects supporting one another.
Doesn't matter what rules say. If Sam does it then it's not cheating.
I do agree with the Despia cards and Ploymerization not being needed to fusion in the deck. Sam tries to find ways around his own rules which is dumb but worm bait should've been fine because you need a insect on the field to use the card. It can't even be a stable card because with no insect on the field you can't use the spell and it becomes a dead card. Sam makes these rules but he doesn't know what ever card do. Mostly he tries to make the rules benifit himself.
I would consider Allure of Darkness within the realm of Duality and Virus because that's kind of cheap to get to draw 2 like that
@@devinb3538 It's funny you mention the Allure of Darkness cause that is also listed in the Wheel rules.
"The ONLY spell/traps allowed are archetypal ones and ones that support the types/attributes included within your archetype."
"If your deck contains Dark Monsters, you can play cards like Allure Of Darkness since it directly supports Dark Monsters"
"You cannot play cards like Trade-In because your deck contains Level 8 Monsters"
I know there is a risk/reward to playing Allure if you don't have a Dark monster in hand, but having Allure but not allowing Trade-In is really weird given I would argue Allure is easier and stronger to activate and use since the cost only comes after the cards are drawn, especially in Despia thanks to Tragedy's effect working when sent to either GY or Banished.
@@PandaJerrett16 It really depends on which archetype you get because Allure is perfect for Despia, but not every archetype has a banish effect. Either way, that and Duality are strong in general.
I'mma say it. Sam deserved that beatdown in game 3.
He deserves it every time
I'm generally not a huge fan of Krawlers but respect that tbey were able to beat a deck that most people would think is superior. Plus Sam's face when he got swarmed and attacked directly was priceless.
When SeeReax won game 3 and starting screaming about insects taking flight and flying around his head 😂😂😂😂🤣
Nobody gonna talk about how Sam drew 3 Polys' back to back to back LOL
Sam's face after the first duel was gold lol I love you guys!!!!!
“What am I supposed to do” while Quaeritis is right there is crazy
If you're referring to the 3rd duel, he can't use Quaeritus because of Deus X-Krawler
I loooove this series, and I think it's way more interesting when the playing field is even like in this video. Sam has such an incredible depth of knowledge for these higher tier decks that it ends up being his biggest advantage. I wish Seereax had the time to really familiarize himself with the decks, so there was more back and forth instead of him losing because he isn't as knowledgeable about operating his archetype.
I'm also curious, and maybe this was already answered, but how were the decks graded for the wheel? Is it based on the community full power decks or on the stripped-down archetype versions that they are actually playing?
Honestly the wheel is complete bs, you cam look through videos and see a complete imbalance in every grade. It's the same with the wheel they spin when they lose
they're most likely graded on how well they'd perform pure with no additional support from outside of the archetype, which might be why zoodiac was so low when at full power it's the second best deck in the entirety of yugioh behind full power tearlaments
Sam's rules state that "Only in archetype spells or spells that support the type/attributes of your monsters" can be played, Fusion is a card frame type, not a monster type. The various official Yu-Gi-Oh video games point this out by having an inbuilt search system for extra deck cards which is search by card frames, your options are: normal, effect, spell, trap, Fusion, synchro,xyz and link when using such features. Polymerization should only be usable under Sam's rules if using an elemental hero deck as Elemental Heroes blazeman and woodsman specifically mention it in their effect texts. I mean no ill will I'm just trying to clarify wording and statements used during the course of the video for anyone who may not understand the issues raised by Sam and Seereax.
You should feel lucky that Sam didn't use Branded fusion or Mirror Jade then by that logic. 💀 How the heck is he supposed to summon his boss monsters without polymerization?!
Eh, I feel like Polymerization is more of a grey area at most, a lot of fusion decks don't have an in house fusion and if the archetype is fusion based then Polymerization should be fair play, especially since Terraforming was allowed in decks based around field spells.
@@mrstealcar4702 doesnt his rules have a ruling where u cant use poly if ur deck has inbuilt polys witch despia clearly has and mirror jade is apart of branded so ofc its not gonna be used in despia instant DQ
@@mrstealcar4702Despia has like three different ways to fusion without poly, what do you mean?
Y'all always manage to make my day irregardless of who wins ...thanks again for the amazing video Sam, and Reax thanks again for letting Sam post these good videos on your chanel
"Trying your best doesn't mean you're beating the best" LMAO!
32:36 bro drew 3 polymerization in a row 😂
Every time Seereax plays a deck he knows, he simply wins 😅😅
This is what happens when SeeReax KNOWS what his deck does. Easy.
All I hear here is he should either listen to Sam’s advice. Or spend 5 mins to actually read the deck he is making.
@@aHumanBeing97😂😂
The moment in the beginning when Sam puts poly and seereax said alright you cheated right away😂😂😂
43:30 Sam's face says it all. Absolute Discuss. Hilarious
🤣🤣🤣 the Beauty
Sam’s face @19:15 was priceless
So, I know I'm incredibly late, but if you are allowed to play poly for a deck archetype that already had a dedicated fusion spell/trap, then you should definitly be allowed to play book of moon for a flip archetype, maybe limit it to 2 or 1 considering the offensive applications, or the card reax was talking about that flips all monsters
13:55
I had to pause the vid coz I f*ing laughed out loud 😂😂. Seriously watching the match before SeeReax unexpected funny comeback 😂🤣
Sam not throwing Fallen Albaz in there actually shows he’s trying to go by the rules …, but y’all right it’s not a competition without someone cheating 🤣! The comedy is A+ 🔥
And then he proceeded to throw in every single other branded despia support and poly despite poly only being allowed if the deck doesn’t have any other fusion cards (like branded in red).
Lol right? All these people getting mad about cheating are missing out on the fun
19:11 a completly masterpiece Let's gooooooo @SeaReax !!!!!!!!! Sam... Hats off to you for not crying pal. Love your channel bro!
That first duel victory was fucking amazing lol
Sam tries to explain why he can cheat at the start of every episode
this bit is mad old and shows how many ppl really do want attention
@@blazeiken2quiet prune
@@blazeiken2sorry bro i didn't know it was illegal to repeat jokes mb
@@theguywhoasked4718not illegal just boring af… Get a new bit
@@blazeiken2thank god he’s not a stand up comedian and no one cares about likes on a UA-cam comment lol dude ain’t out here jacking ppl material to get famous lol he might be 13 lol leave him alone 😂
Bro on god i have never laughed so FUCKING hard in my life as i did when i saw sam's face at 19:12. 🤣😂
Watching Sam fall into despair deeper and deeper every single direct attack had me rolling.
Legit!!! Sams face at the 19:25 mark is just epic....his whole world ruined lol
Thanks for a fun to watch duel and finally Seereax knew how to build a deck!!! I gotta congratulate him for this rarity :)
Congratz Seereax!
wow Sams face bro when Reax beats him HOW DO I BEAT YOUR MONSTERS I DONT NEED TOO HAHAHAH so funny with Sams face i love this series funniest yugioh series on UA-cam fact
Krillin?! Yeah right Sam's more like a Yajarobie😂
Sam's face when seerix does the flying noises haha there buzzing around your ears watch out 🤣🤣
19:31 that was insane Sam had no idea what was going on😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Beating Despia with Krawlers is unfathomably based, as per usual TeamSeereax1 delivers!
Worm bait versus Eradicator Virus.....I dunno, not exactly photon tokens or one time passcode.
Sam is legitimately Yajirobi! He pulls up and annoyingly cuts your tail off when you least suspect it
lmfao!!! the end of the first duel was hilarious af bro
Bro called him Donnie from The Wild Thornberries 😂😭
That definitely got Sam looking in the first duel lol
Nothing makes me happier than seeing Seereax use one of my favorite decks!!
Is Eradicator Epidemic Virus a Despia related card?
The Gigachad Krawler vs The Cringe Despian
I main Branded Despia and I was like there is no way Sam be doing this is B tier since that's like meta. Glad to see it's just despia.
Ong, i was worried sam was gonna sneak in albaz stuff like he did chaos archfiend during the Halloween wheel
Same here
I don’t think it can be meta with branded fusion at 1 honestly.
@@aHumanBeing97 It is literally tier 3 on MD meta, and is still topping every tournament and has been ever since its release
so yes it is most definitely still meta, theres is no "thinking" if it can be🤣
@@aHumanBeing97you underestimate how good Branded fusion is
QUALLLLLLLLIARK
Gotta be my new fave Reax catchphrase LOL
"Don't you ever get Mr f'ed up again" had me dying.
QUAAAALIARK!!!....my favorite part when he says that.
Seereax's krawlers Send Sam into the shadow realm then that means the hero has returned
TeamSeereaX1 cooked this episode 🙏
"Its my deck what do you want me to do"
I'm looking at the extra deck with 2 other fusions both of which you can make and one has an animation
Editor putting The Raptors when he says "Champions on my hat" is so based lol
5:58 The moment when they suddenly playing RUSH DUEL😂😂😂😂😂
"Stop glazing" is wild bro
So SeeReax cant use a card that's specifically an insect token card but Sam can play Allure of Darkness in any dark deck. Seems balanced.
Well Allure of darkness IS different. Its a drawing card that literally says: "If you don't banish a dark monster your entire hand is banished" while token cards are free. Though i'm curious on how swordsoul would fair with the token generating rule. Unless its an archetype thingy
@@ThePurpleMartinwell by rule he played poly because he's deck is a "fusion deck" by that ruling krawlers are a "flip deck" so seereax should be capable of playing any "flip a monster card". Btw I'm against that rule since it makes some decks on specific tier more busted than others. It should just be only 3 rules
1. Pure archetype
2. Pure element support
3. Pure type support that is not part of another pure archetype deck. For example you can't play fire formation spells if you have a beast warrior deck unless it is under the fire formation archetype.
That way cheating would be more controlled, duels would be more creative and fun. (Not saying this series is not fun or creative it just sometimes is not fair in the rules for both, lower tiers Sam had really bad decks because of lack of support and now seereax has gotten really bad decks because of lack of support. If you take the universal support out it balances things).
I agree honestly. Like for example he is using poly and I think It'd be fair if SeeReax could use cards like eclipse or book of Moon. Just keep it strictly to that archetype🤷🏾♂️🫡
Not only allure, he also played chaos cards and EEV. But wait till his fans come up with excuses for the cards 😂
@gravity2048 Wait was EEV not from his staple wheel?
When he won and began singing Crawling in your skin was hilarious 😂😂😂
43:30 sam looked so done with this 😂
Seereax with krawlers, you love to see it.
No tokens? So does that mean Adventure or whatever that relies on tokes is not at all on this wheel?
Wanna read the rules?
A lot of people's complains are just fixed by reading rules
The token generation cards are not allowed if outside the archetype. You cannot use, for example, ohoton sanctuary if you got an archetype that is light but is not photon, but if you spinned photon then you can
Your point about adventure thus makes no sense kek
@@komeiuo3465 I'm just asking cause I legitimately don't know. And hey guess what some of the rules aren't exactly clear. So better to ask to be sure.
no matter how hard they try to make SeeReax the "villain" he just isn't he doesnt have an annoying ass laugh and laugh and call people trash every 5 second when they make 1 mistake
we're back to Sam sulking again everything is perfectly balanced as all things should be
Sam searching up deus X-krawler was insane😂
I like how Sam was searching everything before he does anything second game🤣
Broooooooo when the attacks started coming..... I felt like i was watching yugioh. I GOT SO HYPED!!! I'M PLAYING MASTER DUEL TODAY!!
Bruh I love when they break into song 😂
It's a Good Day when we see Sam get Cooked lol
Is funny how different the duels go when seereax knows his deck
Sam as Krillin… for some reason I can‘t unsee it😂
Sereax literally did a lifeline on the Krawler deck
Sams reaction when SeeReax attacked him with all of his krawler monsters 😂
That was epic! Ahh Sam don’t ever stop making vids with Seereax! Next stop….DUEL-NIGHT BABY
Uncle Sam with the Tax again! 😂
Good luck everyone else - Asian chick from Family Guy driving - Seereax
Last time I checked Masquerade the blazing dragon is not a despia card
Bro the fact that Sam gets 3 poly in a row is crazy 💀
Bruh, no way Worm Bait is against the rules, but Eradicator Epidemic Virus is fine.