Thank you Peter for a very fair review of the Hydromax, warts and all. As you are aware I own an identical version, coming up to its first anniversary. As you point out it is (very) inexpensive, especially when bought on special. I would say stunning value for money when compared to the micro brands and entry level 'name' brands. I was somewhat disappointed that you failed to mention that the bracelet incorporates a very serviceable ratcheted divers extension, helium release valve and the GMT functionality was not further emphasised. The other omission, if I could be so bold, is the Invicta's WEIGHT !. The Hydromax is a serious lump on one's wrist and wearing it should not be taken lightly ... pardon the pun.
Appreciate Video clip! Sorry for the intrusion, I would love your thoughts. Have you ever tried - Dinanlinson Energy Source Approach (erm, check it on google should be there)? It is a good one off guide for discovering super food to super charge your energy minus the hard work. Ive heard some amazing things about it and my m8 after a lifetime of fighting got great results with it.
Amazing watch. Great Quality. An awesome beater. I love the Invicta Pro Divers with the Seiko, Myota and Silleta movements. I have all three. Thank you for sharing.
With that thinking in mind, a deeper depth rating would equate to a deeper reach in my pocket as well. I cannot find a watch that goes deeper under $1000. I have a Hydromax as well as other watches, including a Rolex, and I believe Invicta nailed it with this watch. It is beautiful, can be purchased for under $200, beats all other watches for depth rating for the price, and goes to show how superior a super deep sea watch really is if you pay the price. Can this watch be the king depth rating for the price? I think it is.
I would like to see a video of this watch tested to destruction...Interesting watch to own but looks terrible to wear in public...People would think you're...Special....good video thanks for sharing.
The thing is, if you like it and like the way it looks on you that's the only thing that matters. I sometimes wear my big invictas in public and get stupid looks but who f ing cares, my life doesn't revolve around other people's feelings or opinions.
I’ll agree to disagree! There was no need to make this a 4000 m diver. The fact that it’s a homage watch doesn’t mean it has to live up to every aspect of the original it simply means Rolex built this incredible watch that we would like to honor it by designing our watch to look similar to the original not to be an exact copy of the original there’s simply no need and especially if you want to keep the price low! People who know watches will understand what exactly it is and I think I’m happy with the end results! Anyway great review !
Well I get your point about the thickness and the 1000m limit. But lets be honest, When people go under 1000m depth they have to be in a special submarine in order to survive it, so isn't more than 1000m for a wristwatch not enough already? Just mentioning this. If I'm wrong feel free to correct me. The thing thats bothering me more is the fact that this model didn't come out yet with an automatic movement. Or do automatic movements do not operate well in extreme deep water?
The timing crystal might be the limiting factor of depth rating - the pressure inside the watch will crush the crystal can - and that's about what you can expect from an inexpensive off-the-shelf Ronda movement.
great video and review peter.. it is a somewhat attractive watch..I also own several normal sized invictus and feel they are great bang for the buck..but I can't say that for this model..if I'm not mistaken here in the states I can pick up the borealis bull shark or sea farer 2 for either same or less money..and would be getting a much better made watch..with sapphire crystal to boot. all in all enjoyed the review keep up the great work I retract my remark about the cost..must have dropped drastically since last time I had checked watch out..I now feel it's a good value for price..
Good morning, and nice video! As a new subscriber, and fan of Invicta watches, I must admit the Hydromax is at the epicenter of my growing collection. I own several Pro Divers and Grand Divers but the Hydromax captures the essence of what a large, simplistically elegant watch looks like. Keep up the great videos! Be Well! JMc from Big D
speaking from experience with a hydromax, they don't like water. i snorkeled with mine once when it was new, and everything was tight. it fogged up badly for days. i was lucky that no signs remained once it dried, but suffice to say, it is not my dive watch any longer lol.
another problem with this watch is that if you have to change the battery, the water resistance is toast unless you send it back to invicta or a company that knows what their doing
I have 3 Hydromax.....en or es....and 15 other Invicta's. I like big watches. So i like the Godzilla of watches! HYDROMAX rules. I have also a couple of Bolt Zeus.....es .. And btw, €500,- is not cheap....ok it's not expensive aswell.
I have to agree with you. This is a monstrosity for no good reason. 5000 metres would have been perfect. It looks amazing looking directly at the face. But when you get a side angle view, it looks ridiculous. I was on the bench about buying this watch. Thankfully I saw your review and I totally agree it is ridiculous. I chose an Addiesdive homage Captain Willard for about the same price.
Therein lays the issue with Invicta, and I really want to like them, but can't. Their marketing and design team consistently disappoints. They are all flash and their function rarely lives up to its looks. They're just embarrassing to wear in front of watch connoisseurs. They seriously need new management. Why make a tacky watch, when it's just as easy to make a classy watch?
Hoop Well, here's an answer ... if you live your life by what other people think of you and what you wear...what does that make you? Last I checked we were born alone and we will die alone...so what is your purpose of life? To wear shit that people who you don't even know you or judge you by what you wear? Unbelievable damn you're sad sack of life homie, grow a pair, smfh...Obama years has done your mentality in for the worse....Sad!
It is an homage to the Rolex deep sea challenge of which only 4 were made. It’s a great watch and great quality. Learn your Horology before you comment.
PS: if you can dive to 1000 feet let me know. You are amazing. So who cares below 500 feet what the watch is set to go? It is what it is for history more than your love of a watch. Buy the Reserve Divers of 330m or 200m if what you want is thin. My opinion.
it’s a cool looking watch, but the depth is ridiculous...also a swiss quartz movement is a falacy... a battery is a battery...is a battery...that being said, their watches look cool...also, usually it’s more impressive to fit a movement into a watch with minimal depth...also, you have to be mindful of not smashing the watch when you turn corners
If you are talking about technology we have very low cost way to build super accurate watches but the holy Trinity are still stuck in the days from before electricity so there Look at the monstrosity of today's mechanical watches and the associate cost but the ridiculous lack of accuracy make them nothing more than toys
it's all base on any individual for watch lovers.. it's like songs and music... personally I don't like Adele's song... Sorry.. no doubt it's good though
Just bought it and it's the coolest watch in my collection.
Thank you Peter for a very fair review of the Hydromax, warts and all. As you are aware I own an identical version, coming up to its first anniversary. As you point out it is (very) inexpensive, especially when bought on special. I would say stunning value for money when compared to the micro brands and entry level 'name' brands. I was somewhat disappointed that you failed to mention that the bracelet incorporates a very serviceable ratcheted divers extension, helium release valve and the GMT functionality was not further emphasised. The other omission, if I could be so bold, is the Invicta's WEIGHT !. The Hydromax is a serious lump on one's wrist and wearing it should not be taken lightly ... pardon the pun.
Appreciate Video clip! Sorry for the intrusion, I would love your thoughts. Have you ever tried - Dinanlinson Energy Source Approach (erm, check it on google should be there)? It is a good one off guide for discovering super food to super charge your energy minus the hard work. Ive heard some amazing things about it and my m8 after a lifetime of fighting got great results with it.
As far as the size, if someone asked, I would just say that it helps balance the weight of the M1911 that I carry on the other side... :)
Just bought it. With the white dial rose gold combination, beautiful love it.
Amazing watch. Great Quality. An awesome beater. I love the Invicta Pro Divers with the Seiko, Myota and Silleta movements. I have all three. Thank you for sharing.
Very good review. I must say it is quite large at least for my wrist. I will agree everyone loves a depth rating weather they're into diving or not.👍
With that thinking in mind, a deeper depth rating would equate to a deeper reach in my pocket as well. I cannot find a watch that goes deeper under $1000. I have a Hydromax as well as other watches, including a Rolex, and I believe Invicta nailed it with this watch. It is beautiful, can be purchased for under $200, beats all other watches for depth rating for the price, and goes to show how superior a super deep sea watch really is if you pay the price. Can this watch be the king depth rating for the price? I think it is.
Great review on this watch and a fantastic video. I just bought one this week. Thanks Peter.
wear what you like and what makes you smile. not for its value or anything. screw everyone else! i quite like these...
Eine starke Uhr für Starke Männer.
I would like to see a video of this watch tested to destruction...Interesting watch to own but looks terrible to wear in public...People would think you're...Special....good video thanks for sharing.
The thing is, if you like it and like the way it looks on you that's the only thing that matters. I sometimes wear my big invictas in public and get stupid looks but who f ing cares, my life doesn't revolve around other people's feelings or opinions.
I’ll agree to disagree! There was no need to make this a 4000 m diver. The fact that it’s a homage watch doesn’t mean it has to live up to every aspect of the original it simply means Rolex built this incredible watch that we would like to honor it by designing our watch to look similar to the original not to be an exact copy of the original there’s simply no need and especially if you want to keep the price low! People who know watches will understand what exactly it is and I think I’m happy with the end results! Anyway great review !
Well I get your point about the thickness and the 1000m limit. But lets be honest, When people go under 1000m depth they have to be in a special submarine in order to survive it, so isn't more than 1000m for a wristwatch not enough already? Just mentioning this. If I'm wrong feel free to correct me. The thing thats bothering me more is the fact that this model didn't come out yet with an automatic movement. Or do automatic movements do not operate well in extreme deep water?
I like big watches and suprisingly they dont look too ridiculous on me even though I'm skinny and have skinny wrists
The timing crystal might be the limiting factor of depth rating - the pressure inside the watch will crush the crystal can - and that's about what you can expect from an inexpensive off-the-shelf Ronda movement.
great video and review peter..
it is a somewhat attractive watch..I also own several normal sized invictus and feel they are great bang for the buck..but I can't say that for this model..if I'm not mistaken here in the states I can pick up the borealis bull shark or sea farer 2 for either same or less money..and would be getting a much better made watch..with sapphire crystal to boot.
all in all enjoyed the review keep up the great work
I retract my remark about the cost..must have dropped drastically since last time I had checked watch out..I now feel it's a good value for price..
Good morning, and nice video! As a new subscriber, and fan of Invicta watches, I must admit the Hydromax is at the epicenter of my growing collection. I own several Pro Divers and Grand Divers but the Hydromax captures the essence of what a large, simplistically elegant watch looks like. Keep up the great videos! Be Well! JMc from Big D
Just got this. Love it.😁
speaking from experience with a hydromax, they don't like water. i snorkeled with mine once when it was new, and everything was tight. it fogged up badly for days. i was lucky that no signs remained once it dried, but suffice to say, it is not my dive watch any longer lol.
another problem with this watch is that if you have to change the battery, the water resistance is toast unless you send it back to invicta or a company that knows what their doing
Oh man i bought this watch it is great but somehow the gmt hand runs faster by at least an hour each day i have no idea why????
Hi
Try wearing it under your shirt sleeve.
Or wear one on each wrist and you would never have to lift weights again :-)
I have 3 Hydromax.....en or es....and 15 other Invicta's. I like big watches. So i like the Godzilla of watches! HYDROMAX rules. I have also a couple of Bolt Zeus.....es .. And btw, €500,- is not cheap....ok it's not expensive aswell.
pop the caseback, maybe theres a decent size watch inside
the back is cool
Great review of a terrible looking watch in my opinion 😂
I have to agree with you. This is a monstrosity for no good reason. 5000 metres would have been perfect. It looks amazing looking directly at the face. But when you get a side angle view, it looks ridiculous. I was on the bench about buying this watch. Thankfully I saw your review and I totally agree it is ridiculous. I chose an Addiesdive homage Captain Willard for about the same price.
Good review
even if it had a 20k depth reach.. nobody dives 1k meters anyways 🤷♂️
Therein lays the issue with Invicta, and I really want to like them, but can't. Their marketing and design team consistently disappoints. They are all flash and their function rarely lives up to its looks. They're just embarrassing to wear in front of watch connoisseurs.
They seriously need new management. Why make a tacky watch, when it's just as easy to make a classy watch?
Hoop Well, here's an answer ... if you live your life by what other people think of you and what you wear...what does that make you? Last I checked we were born alone and we will die alone...so what is your purpose of life? To wear shit that people who you don't even know you or judge you by what you wear? Unbelievable damn you're sad sack of life homie, grow a pair, smfh...Obama years has done your mentality in for the worse....Sad!
Wu-Blood Kin why does his opinion bother you. do you live your life getting offended by people who hate the watches you like. get over yourself
It is an homage to the Rolex deep sea challenge of which only 4 were made. It’s a great watch and great quality. Learn your Horology before you comment.
@@tombryan1 Because ppl like him judging ppls tastes makes them fuck wits!
Invicta laughs all the way to the bank.
who cares about ridiculous depth ratings...as long as it is water resistant
I don't think the seconds hand is lining up with the indices well.
Rasheed What? The Second hand lines up perfectly with them from what I see.
What accent is this? I mean I know you're from England (unless you emmigrated) but where abouts in England?
Posh!
PS: if you can dive to 1000 feet let me know. You are amazing. So who cares below 500 feet what the watch is set to go? It is what it is for history more than your love of a watch. Buy the Reserve Divers of 330m or 200m if what you want is thin. My opinion.
A more "serious" depth rating than 1000M? Give me a break!
it’s a cool looking watch, but the depth is ridiculous...also a swiss quartz movement is a falacy... a battery is a battery...is a battery...that being said, their watches look cool...also, usually it’s more impressive to fit a movement into a watch with minimal depth...also, you have to be mindful of not smashing the watch when you turn corners
Fill it with silicone oil
Not only its only 1000 meters, but any serious dive watch would be an automatic I would think.
well normaly yes, but there are a quite a few VERY good divers that are quartz watches. So this is not the problem here :-) Thanks for watching
Philip Janes take a look at many of the seiko marine master watches..then let's revisit a real divers watch won't use quartz
Who dives beyond 1000 meters?
@@pearlbullet I dove the Mariana trench last week!
@@NathanChisholm041 damn you are lucky ,that must be so amazing
If you are talking about technology we have very low cost way to build super accurate watches but the holy Trinity are still stuck in the days from before electricity so there
Look at the monstrosity of today's mechanical watches and the associate cost but the ridiculous lack of accuracy make them nothing more than toys
who the the hell is diving 3200ft......
it's all base on any individual for watch lovers.. it's like songs and music... personally I don't like Adele's song... Sorry.. no doubt it's good though
MURDER WEAPON!
That watch looks absolutely ridiculous...
Horrible looking watches.