Restoration of the NRX Reactor: The First Meltdown (1959)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 64

  • @swokatsamsiyu3590
    @swokatsamsiyu3590 5 днів тому +2

    Yes! You have digitised new reactor goodies for us. These old films are such a joy to watch. The Polygone voice over, the way these people envisioned the world is somehow incredibly endearing. And to think they engineered everything with slide rules, not computers. The skills these builders had is phenomenal!

  • @jhonbus
    @jhonbus 10 днів тому +14

    That pinhole gamma-camera idea was absolute genius!

    • @sashimanu
      @sashimanu 10 днів тому +6

      Pinhole collimator gamma imaging seems to be a field in development even today. Another interesting concept is a coded aperture, used for the same purpose.

  • @joshjones3408
    @joshjones3408 10 днів тому +28

    Fun fact..A guy that helped clean this up ....later on he also was the only us president allowed to go to a nuclear accident... which was three mile island....
    Jimmy cater....

    • @whatisnuclear
      @whatisnuclear  10 днів тому +6

      Yeah when I got this digitized and was watching it I was looking out for a young Jimmy Carter. Not sure if I see him in there or not.

    • @FixItStupid
      @FixItStupid 10 днів тому

      He's Nuclear Stupid & Had Cancer How Many Times FJC & FJB

    • @FixItStupid
      @FixItStupid 10 днів тому

      @@whatisnuclear @ 41 CPM Vent & Leak See Vogel Is In A Bad WAY Right NOW Cancer FOR ALL = Nuclear

    • @BlackPill-pu4vi
      @BlackPill-pu4vi 9 днів тому +5

      I remember Jimmy Carter. Far more educated and qualified than any POTUS after him but yet, his presidency was mostly a failure. Just shows that intelligence and moral character are not always good measures of political leadership.

    • @Muonium1
      @Muonium1 9 днів тому +4

      And as of this writing the only president to reach 100 years old.

  • @AppliedCryogenics
    @AppliedCryogenics 11 днів тому +19

    Fantastic video! Thanks for sharing. Sometime in the future, if society ever decides to reprioritize real problems over manufactured ones, we're gonna need archives like this to get back to work.

    • @FixItStupid
      @FixItStupid 10 днів тому

      Nuclear Stupid To Be Smart 24 k Years OF Death ALL GREED LIES OF NUCLEAR COME DUE IN THE CANCER LOTTO

  • @syfieldsjr1576
    @syfieldsjr1576 3 дні тому

    Amazing video and editing! Thanks

  • @heintmeyer2296
    @heintmeyer2296 10 днів тому +7

    I love how the techniques used by the engineers to deal with the wrecked reactor (wrapping with tarps, fussing around with ropes) were well know to pirates.

    • @sashimanu
      @sashimanu 10 днів тому +3

      - Arr! What's them dose rate, matey?
      - Shiver me timbers! Ten bloody Roentgens per hour, Cap'n

    • @weathermaniac1
      @weathermaniac1 10 днів тому

      It does indeed make one think

  • @winstonsmith478
    @winstonsmith478 10 днів тому +4

    Very interesting and, WOW, what a major PITA.

  • @erdngtn9942
    @erdngtn9942 День тому +1

    What strikes me here is that no problem cannot be solved. Making nature our bitch.

  • @dglcomputers1498
    @dglcomputers1498 9 днів тому +1

    There's a now being decommissioned nuclear site not too far from here where some low level contaminated waste water was literally pumped about 4.5 miles out to sea.
    Look up Winfrith, Dorset. There's is/was a video on here on them installing/building the pipeline back in the 60's(?). The site itself was somewhat interesting as unlike all our commercial nuclear power plants were sited right next to the sea/rivers whereas this was a few miles inland, though the only power generator here was a lower power SGHWR test/prototype reactor, all other reactors were just test/prototype reactors that weren't built for electricity generation.

  • @ljubomirculibrk4097
    @ljubomirculibrk4097 10 днів тому +8

    Dumping radioactive water in a creek?
    Inovative

    • @FixItStupid
      @FixItStupid 10 днів тому

      Cancer For ALL The Earth

    • @Jack_Luck.v2
      @Jack_Luck.v2 9 днів тому +3

      They did specify that the water was filtered through a sand a clay dike into a canal leading to the creek. The canal did not contain radioactivity, so the water was technically clean*.
      But, let's be honest, wtf are they going to do with the contamination that is now present in that dike? It feels like a Hanford.

    • @MadScientist267
      @MadScientist267 9 днів тому

      ​@@Jack_Luck.v2Solid form is much easier to deal with than liquid.

    • @Nill757
      @Nill757 9 днів тому +1

      Low dose, like the water in human bodies.

    • @_ruddegar
      @_ruddegar 8 днів тому +1

      They probably pump and defuse it through clay and dirt, then take the clay and dirt to a secure dump cite.

  • @registromalplena2514
    @registromalplena2514 11 днів тому +3

    I want to know when the washing the laundry do they use regular water heavy water or something somewhere in between?

    • @whatisnuclear
      @whatisnuclear  10 днів тому +5

      I think it was medium water

    • @registromalplena2514
      @registromalplena2514 10 днів тому

      @whatisnuclear yeah I think I did hear that somewhere before. But it seems like something that on the surface seems like it'd be really straightforward and simple and you don't really think about.

    • @sashimanu
      @sashimanu 10 днів тому +1

      Regular water obviously. Heavy water is very expensive and its properties are not required for plain old detergent action.

    • @bythecringe
      @bythecringe 10 днів тому +1

      It would have been regular water: Heavy water's special property is that it's good at encouraging nuclear fission reactions. Handy in a reactor - less so in a laundry.

    • @FixItStupid
      @FixItStupid 10 днів тому

      Drink Up Cancer Rate Shows The Facts 3 Nuclear Melt Downs In The Sea Never Stopped @ 41 CPM

  • @kellysmith4625
    @kellysmith4625 9 днів тому +1

    Wow...this preceeded the Kyshtym meltdown by about 5 years.

    • @dmacpher
      @dmacpher 8 днів тому

      Canadas role in both the Manhattan project and the nuclear power industry in general isn’t well known. But Canada and the UK had a program before the U.S. called “Tube Alloys”, it’s what eventually became manhattan.

  • @jimsvideos7201
    @jimsvideos7201 9 днів тому +1

    I don’t even want to think about how many people got dosed and how badly.

  • @kellysmith4625
    @kellysmith4625 9 днів тому

    In watching their method(s) of radioactive cleanup, I just shook my head. Filtering into a creek?

  • @davidwarm6799
    @davidwarm6799 9 днів тому +2

    The solution to pollution was dilution.

    • @tomkatt2321
      @tomkatt2321 9 днів тому +1

      It usually is, even today.

  • @kainhall
    @kainhall 6 днів тому

    when they said "natural uranium" i started to get RBMK flashbacks........

    • @kainhall
      @kainhall 6 днів тому

      "because cooling water had boiled out of some channels"
      .
      oh god.... it is like the RBMK.......

    • @swokatsamsiyu3590
      @swokatsamsiyu3590 5 днів тому

      An RBMK cannot be critical on natural uranium. It needs some enrichment in order to be able to reach criticality. But yeah, both reactors are a pressure tube design. And also yes, the CANDU shares the pesky positive void coefficient with our big, grumpy Soviet reactor, albeit much smaller. And in case of an emergency, a CANDU can dump its moderator out of the Calandria. Something that is impossible with graphite blocks. That's why that coefficient is much more troublesome, not to mention dangerous, in an RBMK.

  • @deathhawk81
    @deathhawk81 9 днів тому +1

    It was Dyatlov I tell you! He was in charge of this one as well, claiming he was on the toilet

  • @mattharvey8712
    @mattharvey8712 8 днів тому

    Wow.......sand filter.......above ground burrial .......that was the reactor.......hmmmm........they did one in my back yard to........rocketdynn .....
    It a supper fund site ......

  • @markrix
    @markrix 9 днів тому

    Still cant believe dood got spiked to the ceiling, but id take that over radiaton death over weeks..

    • @rtqii
      @rtqii 9 днів тому +3

      Different reactor excursion. That happened in an army test reactor in Idaho I believe... Three dead when forcing a stuck control rod out, the steam explosion sheared off the pressure head bolts and impaled one of the deceased to the ceiling. SL-1 reactor.

    • @markrix
      @markrix 9 днів тому

      @rtqii thx I wasn't quite sure!

    • @allangibson8494
      @allangibson8494 8 днів тому

      @@rtqiiThe SL-1 had a single control rod… The runaway happened when they lifted it out to recouple it to its actuator…

    • @MrPither999
      @MrPither999 7 днів тому

      Still can't figure out how to spell dude either..

  • @mnblkjh6757
    @mnblkjh6757 8 днів тому

    🇨🇦👍🙂

  • @widescreennavel
    @widescreennavel 10 днів тому

    Seep that radiation through sand and mud? Chef's Kiss to the guy who told this lie to the public. This is why NP will never make a comeback.

    • @heathcliff8624
      @heathcliff8624 10 днів тому +15

      Your ignorance is evident.

    • @richardflint2215
      @richardflint2215 10 днів тому

      @@heathcliff8624 He kind of has a point. It's the ignorance shown in this video that is most evident. Not sure where to dump millions of gallons of radioactive water? I know, we'll dump it in a creek! Got a giant steel disc that is dangerously radioactive? I know, we'll cover it with a tarpaulin and bury it in the ground! Got basement full of fission products? Well sand and grind the radionuclides off the porous concrete surfaces and paint over it! (Gosh, I hope there wasn't a lot of dust! - or did that go up in the Dyson they were using?)

    • @BlackPill-pu4vi
      @BlackPill-pu4vi 9 днів тому

      Nuclear power won't make a comeback because the West has been deintelligenced. A better word won't pass the cneorss. We don't have the schools, the workforce, the leadership, or the industrial habits to build new nuke power plants. When we did over 40 years ago, it was a clusterfkkk because each power plant was a one-of-a-kind boondoggle that went far over budget and had many problems before being commissioned. France and Sweden did it right. They came up with one good design and made them all the same. An engineer in one can work in another and the economies of scale made repairs and maintenance relatively affordable by nuclear standards.

    • @allangibson8494
      @allangibson8494 8 днів тому

      President Jimmy Carter was directly involved in the clean up of this accident. His UNEXPOSED relatives mostly died of cancer…