Paul McCartney vs Billy Shears - voice comparison - Yesterday 1965 vs 1973. Very different voices.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
- From original video • Beatles yesterday live... , • Paul McCartney & Wings...
Paul McCartney vs Billy Shears - voice comparison - Yesterday 1965 vs 1973 - Two different voices. Only 8 years between the two interpretations.
@justiceforjamespaulmccartney
/ justicefor_jamespaulmc...
![The Beatles • “Yesterday” • LIVE 1965 [Reelin' In The Years Archive]](/img/n.gif)
This is superb. I am a sound engineer of 40+ years. JPM sings with conviction, like he OWNS it. Billy sings it like a COVER artist. The core accent/dialect is different : Billy delivering his naturally LESS Scouse pronunciation. Billy is over compensating and introducing 'passion' in the wrong places.... "She wouldn't say" : JPM throws that line out in a totally unique way. Billy stretches the line to try and INJECT 'feeling' and 'yearning'. Over thinking the Delivery of FEELING often ends up with the voice emanating more from the nazel head chamber. Nice try Billy, but nowhere close. Love your channel. Love JPM. 😊❤️
Thanks for the comment.
❤❤❤❤ well said! JPM sings with conviction from the ❤
JPM’s vice has a strength and clarity that the other clearly lacks. The difference in tone depth is obvious.
WOw, exactly. Billy has a nasal pitch and tone. Sounds a bit thin and forced.
I tell you truly this has been the greatest cover up in Rock history!
Oh my, the REAL JPM had the most beautiful voice that radiated from head to toe through all of his fans male/female young/old. I miss JPM terrible and await the day that the truth comes out and we attain some type of peace and justice. 😇🥰❤
Paul has a more throaty sound with a bass to it as well as higher notes where faul is a just a higher flat sound. Faul sounds like a guy doing a very good impression of Paul but not quite 100 percent
When your face grows long it really does a number on your voice. But if the part on your head changes and you grow 5 incbes taller...forget about it.
...or, blame it on acid.
Just grown sume mustache and everyone think you dead
@@solithd3995 a moustache and 5 inches in height..
@khalgarrison , Fault is six feet two and a half inches tall. That's 3 and a half inches taller than Paul was, at 5'11".
Paul: Yesta-day
Faul: Yester-day
U are right 😢
You are right! That "r" placement from Faul was a glaring error.
The “yes-ta-day is how vocal coaches teach you to handle consonants like R sounds. This keeps you from sounding twangy or countryish.
@@wiiztecOr even Yes-ter-day. It’s the song title. The writer would not fundamentally change the pronunciation in this bizarre fashion- or become a Tenor when once he was a rich Baritone.
The older fellow has a much bigger chin.
The real Paul's has a youthful resonant clear octave and has less pause, off the cuff. The other voice is lower more contrived thought out.
Thanks for the comment.
❤️❤️❤️❤️
Wtf is this Billy character anyway….go get your own career✌️
Not only are the voices different but Paul's voice has a beauty that Billy's never has.
Yes, Paul's voice was wonderful.
I agree. Paul had that innocent quality and purity that Karen Carpenter had in buckets. The new Paul sounds, as a previous commenter put it, like a cover act.
Wanna hear real Paul's voice? Listen to "the night before", there's no way faul could sing with such a full voice.
This is hard for me to believe, but I can definitely tell something is off there. Great channel and I'll be going down this rabbit hole!
After many years of singing the same song artists typically change the style/mood even melody and harmony for performances. Their voices sound very much alike in a lot of ways but I guess we should just ignore that completely.
A good reveal is in the way they say "yesterday". Paul mutes the R while Faul accentuates the R
Paul had a lovely dry edge to his voice, and a ‘cocky’ personality to match. In the nicest possible way….
Wow! Really have a big difference
My support brother
And why does Paul choose to stand and Faul choose to sit? Maybe Faul stuggles to play guitar left handed?
good point. and one wears a suit and the other a clown shirt. says it all.
@@cl9826 , Paul had class and style, in all of the clothes that he wore. Billy/Fault never has had any good taste or style in anything.
The one word that does for me is believe,not even close
JPM sings on the sharp side and Billy is flat. It's so clear to me as is their faces! I'm amazed how people have no perception skills to see and hear the differences.
Thanks for the comment.
Nailed it with this comment. 👌
It's insane
@pmonte1872, a lot of people live in a world where they don't want anything to change their "rose colored" view of things. They're so set against change that they deny the truth, put right in front of them, for fear of changing the "status quo".
The eyes are a mirror to the soul. They are not even close.Look deep into their eyes. Paul carries a pain Billy cannot fake.
Paul's eyes are dark brown and Billy's are hazel
That's really good work and clear comparison.
It sounds like faul is singing whilst putting on the fake accent to sound like the real Paul.
Yes!!! Even says "yesteeRday" in the middle
Brilliant vid. What a difference! The real Paul had a real depth and beauty to his voice that Billy Shears never had.
Hi
Thanks again for your brilliant research on this issue. For a long time I was 90% sure there was something different about the later 'Paul'. But I was fooled because I was convinced paperback writer(real Paul) was after Strawberry Fields and Penny Lane in 1967. thanks to following your work I have further investigated and found paperback writer was from May 1966. Now no doubt 100% there is Paul and there is Faul. Great work. Now everything Heather Mills said makes perfect sense.
Just played this to my 18yo grandson who loves 60 and70s music. His verdict 100% NOT the same person
He’s actually singing about his impending death. “There’s a shadow hanging over me”; “why (I) have to go, I don’t know, (my controllers) won’t say”; “(deals made) were such an easy game to play”; “now I long for yesterday”. Sad
It sounds like Billy is singing through his nose more try to imitate JPM.
There is a version by Faul from as early as 1970 only 5 years apart. Not only can you tell by the voice but he struggled playing left handed
In addition to all the great comments, Paul could hold his notes longer, Faul has to try and sneak a breath in.
I never understood why Wings sounded so mediocre when Paul McCartney and John Lennon had written the songs for the Beatles, and the Beatles were rather good. Around 15 years ago, I got a double CD 'Best Of' of Wings from the library and barely played it that week: I found it very uninspiring and bland. Now, discovering 'the truth' this past week, it all makes sense as to Wings was so mediocre. Because the real Paul McCartney was not the singer or song-writer!
Yes, Billy Shepherd is a mediocre musician. I never listen to Wings. The real James Paul McCartney (1942-1966) was a genius.
Remember: Only 8 years between the two interpretations!
Faul is skating on top of the song, Paul is fully immersed.
Paul McCartney died and was replaced in 1966. I hope that one day Paul will find justice.
No sooner had I posted the com, I found a Billy song posted, save us from his official site, spooky...
With headphones the difference is even clearer! How can anyone think that the second voice here is Paul McCartney! It's a completely different tone and sound the more the evidence is layed out the more obvious it is that Paul died and William Campbell took over I just wish he would confess to what happened before he passes and give Paul the recognition he deserves!
Thanks for the comment.
The Memoirs of Billy Shears is the full confession. REVELATIONS. Also PAUL MCCARTNEY IS DEAD on Tubi as told by George Harrison. Check out the bread crumbs… the evidence is everywhere!
Justice does a great daily reminder!
Billy sings very slowly and likes to drag the words longer. Paul sings faster and more confidently
@canopyfields, It was easy for Paul to sing any song with confidence, because he knew how to "own" every song and "make it his own", while he was singing it. That's the mark of a great singer, as opposed to a weak, mediocre one like Faul.
La voce di Paul è più calda e decisa ,l'altra è più nasale
They used to call Billy the man of a thousand voices. He is very good at mimicking. But there's a definite difference when you isolate the vocals.
It's not earthly possible that it's the same voice, and Faul can't sing.
To everyone who reads these posts please go on youtube and play Strawberry Fields forever 1967 with subtitles on. 'NOTHING is REAL'. Very enlightening ! Twice when they sing nothing is real Faul looks right down camera.
I do not compare them by their voice and style, what is more noticeable for me is the way they plays the guitar, James Paul McCartney plays it nice smooth and easy without looking at the chords while Billy is always looking at the chords with uncertainty, and they have different strumming stroke,,
I’m sure you get this comment all the time but I’m new to this and that is absolutely not the same singer. Unless there is funny business with the second version. I saw a comment about for this to be true this Billy had to go on and do all this incredible music accomplishments like Wings etc…. I think ironically that type of comment and thinking is kind of the point. It this happened it was because it was a once in a trillion chance to have someone talented enough that looked like Paul to pull it off. That and the time 1966. All information and media was controlled and disseminated in a fashion that could sincerely help pull this off. It would have been hard and maybe even touch and go those first 6 to 12 months but the farther away from the incident they got the easier it got until they get a sense that they pulled it off. They saw Billy was good enough to blur the lines forever. It was then that you maybe can interpret a cocky type attitude emerge as they know it’s really unprovable especially at that moment in time. So you see the limit get pushed farther and farther with the tributes etc…
ua-cam.com/video/grQGNvri0Dc/v-deo.html
Turn off the audio and look at the head shape, that's more than enough.
Paul has a wider face and likely a wider mouth. This allows him to have richer and more effortless harmonics then Billy with a more narrow face/mouth. You can hear a thinner more trebly sound with Billy although he can hit the high notes easily.
The two singers have slightly different tonal and even a bit different accents... interesting.
you can hear a slight scottish tilt in bill’s…
Pauls voice is like a full orchestra. Fauls voice is like a rusty fiddle.
Paul say "Goodbye", Faul say "Hello"!
I don't know why Paul say, "Goodbye", Faul say, "Hello"...
Paul say, "¿Why?"
And Faul say, "I don't know"
Hi!
Make a video about that clip please!
I mean "Hello, Goodbye".
Ok.
@@justiceforjamespaulmccartney Thanks!
Paul has a full and round tone to his vocals. Billy's vovals are thin and sound strained and slightly flat in terms of a lack of fullness of sound
Check the phrasing/timing of the words/lines.
Especially "why she had to go, I don't know, i couldn't say"
Paul is living it. There is anticipation.
Faul is clinical..."on the beat"
The orig Paul is really beautiful than the fake Faul
Paul M is original. Billy is totally different. I’m hoping that someday, Billy will tell the whole world that he’s not the real Paul M. It’s almost 60 years now that he’s fooling the world.
Heather Mills eventually found out and couldn't get away from him quick enough. It looks as if she received 25 million quid hush money and probably had to sign so many NDAs that she run out of pens.
Don't forget George often called him Billy Beatle. Even his wife Olivia greeted him one time with, 'Hello, Billy.'
Both Paul and John had great natural vocals. It seemed as easy as talking to them. Fauls voice sounds contrived, almost like he is trying to copy someone else. Very obvious in a side by side comparison. Great detective work Watson 😂
Thank you!
Sources: Paul ua-cam.com/video/4j3uytP4aCg/v-deo.html , Billy ua-cam.com/video/grQGNvri0Dc/v-deo.html
Is no one gonna talk about the jaw difference, THE NOSE THE BIG ASS JAW BILLIE HAS COMPARED TO PAUL my god , i can see why it was easier to fool people back then when technology wasnt as advanced as it is now, people werent able to put comparisons together, but not only that the beatles have already lived and everything in the past from them is recorded and can be investigated more thouroughly..im completely shocked i didn't catch on or realize it sooner. ALSO when i watched the now and then little documentary, and saw "Paul" Billie, i was like "wth? Why does his face looks like hes had cosmetic surgery before" peoples faces look really weird and kinda waxy when they have had work done on their face and they age real old.. now that i found out about billie 30 minutes ago it makes sense now 💀
Oltre ad essere diversa,la voce di paul è piu bella e armoniosa rispetto a quella di Billy.
Yesterday was incredibly never released as a single. Faul could never have pulled it off singing it live whilst playing left handed in 1967.
Yes the real Paul did die in the fall of 1966. My heart goes out to his family. Why is this important? Because if they can replace a rock star, they can replace a President, Prime Minister, etc. Make sense? Ok trolls....let's go! :)
Billy's Stimme ist viel dünner😂 als JPM's
Billy's voice is much thinner 😢
RIP JPM❤
LOVE from Germany /Bavaria, Ingrid (62 years young✨)
👍
Rip Paul McCartney
Also listen to Paul's voice in Besame Mucho!! Very pure.
No se parecen no es Paul
Great job!
I was wondering, besides a listening analysis, has there ever been an audio forensic analysis conducted using tools such as spectrum analyzers, etc.?
I mean, what we've just heard in the video might be debatable and contestable, so could it be shown in terms of waveforms instead? If I'm not mistaken, in many police investigations, such tools are used to explore potential matches or discrepancies between voices presumed to be the same...
It was done in the 70s by, if I'm not mistaken, the inventor of it. Guess the verdict?
Also, I dont remember whether it was in that analysis or another, it was found that there were 3 different "Paul" voices in the Sgt. Peppers album alone
Faul has a weak and nasally voice. Pauls is beautiful and full of emotion.
Have any of you read The Memoirs of Bill Shears? Explains pretty much everything. William "Billy Shears" Shepherd replaced Paul in 1966 after Paul died in a car crash.
Paul sounds more full, chest voice. Billy is nasally and thin.
Yes those voices do sound a bit different indeed 🤔 However, the spirit of the music also changed after 66. When that white album was released, was quite a shock to this long time beatles fan. Truth is didn't recognize the group any longer and stopped listening to them 😯
Avril Lavigne was replaced too. A video comparing her voice in 2003 vs 2007 shows a clear difference, but enough similarities to fool the masses. I was fooled too, i grew up with her music. She died in 2003 and was replaced by a girl named Melissa Vandella.
I have perfect pitch and have played musical instruments and sang since age 6.
These are definitely two different voices. The first is a rich Baritone, the second a weaker Tenor pitcher male voice. The first has a natural northern accent which is clear in the pronunciation of words- especially Yesterday, itself. The second is a neutral non-natural pronunciation where the Tenor voice attempts to remove all traces of accent from the words, and in some places, a false Trans-Atlantic pronunciation is applied to words - again, Yesterday. He sounds like many tribute act singers still do today in that respect. They are categorically not the same voice.
I suggest that anyone in doubt looks at and listens to “The Analogues” and “the Beatles Magical Orchestra “ on UA-cam and listen without video.
Both of the singers who sing the “JPM” parts of songs do a better impression of Paul McCartney than this second singer.
Thank you for the comment!
@@justiceforjamespaulmccartney You’re welcome. I am a critical thinker and analyse purely by data and factual evidence. Your excellent video shocked me as I wasn’t aware of the “Paul is Dead” theory at all prior to this so had no preconceptions. I was just searching and listening to some of my favourite Beatles songs here while writing a paper.
Your video came up and at first glance I thought ???? But I was intrigued. My comment is my first impression, however I listened many times again and this only reinforced my first analysis.
JPM's northern influence comes out extremely strongly in this comparison. Enough said.
@Justice for James Paul McCartney
There's a video of Paul McCartney leaving the studio speeding down the road and crashing I saw a few years ago. I pretty sure it got taken off UA-cam. If you can hunt it down if you know what it is. That would be a great video for your channel.
ua-cam.com/video/jtLnzoxltd4/v-deo.html
@Justice for James Paul McCartney
Not sure that's how I remember the video, but thanks. Was there someone in the car with Paul. That I didn't know.
Billy’s voice is so much more nasal
True, Faul doesn't sing like our Paul, nor, does he Talk like Him,....Faul, may be a Canadian Police Officer, the Beatles met during one of their Concert Tour's!
Paul clearly had way better diction and tone than Billy who sounds much more nasal. Also Billy has a long douchey face while Paul had a cute round face.
I don't think Billy sounds all that bad. He hits some higher notes actually. But what a shame.
Its because its not the same person. Very simple folks.
This is a beautiful song. I think he wrote about his mother on the 10 year anniversary of her death and sadly i think he just found it all too much
I'm not even sure the picture of Billy on the right is actually Billy. It looks like one of his doubles, and this particular double always looked Denny Laine to me
@@carlosimotti3933 Is Billy.
OMYGOD BRO YOU OPEN MY MIND FUCK FAUL I WANNA HEAR PAUL REAL PAUL IRL PLS GOD DO IT 😭😭😭
xd
Hasta Bernardo del zorro notaría la diferencia
Who is Billy Shepherd?
Billy Shepherd replaced Paul McCartney in 1966 after Paul's death.
I guess the “replacement’s “ person was William Campbell not shepherd.
@@stoicminds777 Shepherd, Shears or Campbell.
Faul is nasaly and pronounces the R in "yesterday" lol
And bends up to reach the note...
Well I can definitely hear the difference. Billy sounds just like Wings of course. I grew up with Billy's voice and always thought Paul was different.
Paul= ai dont nou she ud'n sey pronunciación britanica
Faul= ai dont nou she urn' t sey pronunciación americana.
Minuto 1:40
And finally I know, why I never liked him 😮
While the one and only REAL JPM is such a likeable, lovely sweet man❤
SYMPHATICO😍😘🥰
👍
Fake Paul has narrower head.
Why can’t you get a Paul fingerprint and Billy shears fingerprint, and see who is who- after all or after Faul,
jamesleroywilson.medium.com/the-paul-mccartney-mystery-388e1501aae5
If You need proof watch 1966 paperback writer then Penny lane 1967. Not same person. Great songs but not Paul
Also video of strawberry fields forever from 1967. Not same person
Paul is on top of the High Notes , Faul is Reaching and goes into Falsetto lower than Paul.
Blimey what a difference 🤔🤔🤔
the face especially mouth small
Photos don't lie nor do the voices. It's apparent to the human eye that 2 diff people are involved here.
Your right he can,t sing I think it,s a freemason's trick!
Faul = Fake Paul
If you wanna convince me maybe link below the two recordings you used.
ua-cam.com/video/4j3uytP4aCg/v-deo.html , ua-cam.com/video/grQGNvri0Dc/v-deo.html
😮
Faul sad, got roped into the scam , probably had no choice
What about hs family? No one of his family made anything to unmask the imposter?
They were forced to keep everything secret.
My God! Shears must HATE the internet.
I kinda think he loves it. He knows we’re still the minority, yet he feels at least some folks know what I pulled off and I still get to keep Paul’s money and name!
I agreed, Paul was a genius, Billy was great though..
Paul has a stout neck. Teddy boy has a giraffe neck