Utahns react to Supreme Court ruling on domestic violence gun ownership

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
  • The Supreme Court decided Friday to uphold a federal gun control law intended to protect victims of domestic violence.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 68

  • @bbreezy2060
    @bbreezy2060 3 місяці тому +19

    The domestic violence laws are a complete joke in Utah.

    • @jonslg240
      @jonslg240 3 місяці тому

      You can get convicted of DV just by being in a yelling match. You can get convicted of DV by grabbing your partners wrists so they can't keep hitting you (it happens a LOT).
      Just imagine if we used a law like this to not just restrict, but outright ban people's First Amendment rights. How about 5th ammendment rights? It's already being used to ban their Second Amendment rights.. AND their Fourth Amendment rights.

    • @KaiWatson
      @KaiWatson 3 місяці тому

      True. Chauvinism capital of America. Thanks Mitt Romney + pals.

  • @edwardkaufman8930
    @edwardkaufman8930 3 місяці тому +8

    So innocent until proven guilty is out of the question in Utah. Can you say UnConstitutional.

    • @calebfoster4855
      @calebfoster4855 3 місяці тому

      @@edwardkaufman8930 well if you've committed a crime that is also one of the most dangerous to respond to for officers yeah, they probably shouldn't have the right to own a gun.

  • @robs4517
    @robs4517 3 місяці тому +4

    I know far more men who are victims of a crazy stalker girlfriend than I know women who've been victims of men.

    • @raymondspogo
      @raymondspogo 3 місяці тому

      This is your first thought? What difference does it make?

    • @robs4517
      @robs4517 3 місяці тому

      @raymondspogo just want to ensure that equality is applied equally.

    • @alistairmackintosh9412
      @alistairmackintosh9412 3 місяці тому

      Found the incel...

    • @robs4517
      @robs4517 3 місяці тому

      @alistairmackintosh9412 Found it no doubt, in your mirror. But, I'll give you a courtesy laugh for your sad effort.

  • @kayduhaime8390
    @kayduhaime8390 3 місяці тому

    *it?

  • @splinter1055
    @splinter1055 3 місяці тому

    I thought we were equal?

    • @raymondspogo
      @raymondspogo 3 місяці тому

      What? This isn't just for women. It's for men also.

  • @nogunnofear6703
    @nogunnofear6703 3 місяці тому +3

    Can't take rights away!? See roe v Wade.

    • @FRUITSAMURAIX
      @FRUITSAMURAIX 3 місяці тому +7

      Where does it say in the bill of rights about Roe v Wade?

    • @ZachariahtheMessiah
      @ZachariahtheMessiah 3 місяці тому +2

      @@FRUITSAMURAIX there are numerous rights we hold as citizens that are not in the Bill of Rights - so you're insisting that r*pe victims should be forced to carry to term because the bill of rights say otherwise?

    • @FRUITSAMURAIX
      @FRUITSAMURAIX 3 місяці тому +2

      @ZachariahtheMessiah Yes, and it says nothing in the Bill of Rights about Roe v Wade. But it does say the right to bare arms. Maybe less victims if the girl just carried a gun.

    • @scdrescher1
      @scdrescher1 3 місяці тому +1

      @@FRUITSAMURAIXthe bill of rights says nothing about the wearing of sleeveless shirts.

    • @weezem
      @weezem 3 місяці тому +1

      ​​@@ZachariahtheMessiah Last time I checked, rights are for everyone equally and don't discriminate based off of race, religion, and sex. Thinking something that only half the population can partake in is not a right, it's a privilege. Abortion is a privilege, not a right.

  • @coachanderson2704
    @coachanderson2704 3 місяці тому +6

    Victims safety; is having a gun to protect yourself, from your crazy BF is the best way you can do! Bills on paper don't work, just go ask my friend who was gun downed by her crazy ex-husband! Get a gun and get training, and carry daily! That is the only way!

    • @raymondspogo
      @raymondspogo 3 місяці тому

      Well gun owners won't let us pass red flag laws, so this is the best we can do.

    • @darrenremund5680
      @darrenremund5680 3 місяці тому

      That's because red flag laws are unconstitutional. If you don't like that then I don't think that the US is the place for you.

  • @BaobobMiller
    @BaobobMiller 3 місяці тому +3

    Interpreting law is the simultaneous repealing and passing of new law.

  • @annarcher5198
    @annarcher5198 3 місяці тому +27

    I had women sitting at my bar talking to each other about fake DV claims they have gotten away with...

  • @DennisLock-x8f
    @DennisLock-x8f 3 місяці тому +1

    Just round about infringment.

  • @carlday-jy7ct
    @carlday-jy7ct 3 місяці тому +1

    Taking 2nd Amendment rights away for future crimes is unconstitutional. If you are on parole or probation, you have a conditional release from custody and your rights can be waived voluntarily in order for that release. Protection orders can now violate 1st and 2nd amendments. If someone has committed violence, then put them in jail. No guns in jail.

  • @skippypeanutbutter9136
    @skippypeanutbutter9136 3 місяці тому +17

    yeah no... there won't be any red flags or false accusations now. nope. never

    • @10Wk3y84R
      @10Wk3y84R 3 місяці тому +3

      Better to temporarily disarm someone (which, how often does that happen?) than let some domestic abuser use his guns on someone innocent.

    • @raymondspogo
      @raymondspogo 3 місяці тому

      And if there is we should just ignore the real DV situations.

    • @oldscratch3535
      @oldscratch3535 3 місяці тому

      ​@@10Wk3y84RSure, let's just assume guilt.

  • @marcofguzman3075
    @marcofguzman3075 3 місяці тому +7

    Only after do process 😅

  • @davidcook9616
    @davidcook9616 3 місяці тому

    The Constitution is not up for interpretation, if you don't understand it get educated, good grief man

  • @synthdave1158
    @synthdave1158 3 місяці тому

    Agreed why go the fast route with domestic violence using a gun when you can spend all night using your fists!

  • @Ziggyman-jx4vy
    @Ziggyman-jx4vy 3 місяці тому +6

    Domestic violence calls are the most dangerous ones any police officer can confront. Allowing the perpetrators to obtain or keep guns not only makes it dangerous for the police but is even more dangerous for the victims and their families.

  • @TheRealBarshonk
    @TheRealBarshonk 3 місяці тому +2

    Cant buy a gun in Florida if you are registered for medical cannabis

  • @warmwomyn
    @warmwomyn 3 місяці тому +23

    Supreme court didn't think twice to take women's civil rights away.

    • @caucasianafrican1435
      @caucasianafrican1435 3 місяці тому +3

      What civil right?

    • @toussaintchivars9005
      @toussaintchivars9005 3 місяці тому

      Body autonomy. Please try to keep up or stop watching Fox Spews for information. ​@caucasianafrican1435

    • @weezem
      @weezem 3 місяці тому

      Which civil rights were those?

    • @wipatriot510
      @wipatriot510 3 місяці тому +1

      What "civil rights" were taken away...???

    • @johnabbott3896
      @johnabbott3896 3 місяці тому +2

      Abortion is NOT a Civil Right....The Court merely kicked the wuestion back to the States....where it belonged all along.

  • @user-wp8vk6ro6y
    @user-wp8vk6ro6y 3 місяці тому +1

    Clowns in the courts in utah also restrict archary equipment.