Pastor Bruscha, thank you so much for the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery given to the Apostle Paul as found in the King James Bible. I’m so grateful to have stumbled across this teaching. The truth of Christ still stands. Amen. Grace be unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ. 🙏
How is that anathema? And how it it, all you can do is gracelessly sling mud at brothers who trust your Savior? Both those terms you used are H A Ironside's pejoratives.. so please say why Baptism is absolutely required. Also, please state when Peter ever preached salvation by grace alone apart from the law prior to his Acts 15 reconsideration (forced on him by Paul) to not foist laws and circumcision upon the gentiles.. It would seem Acts 2 folks just can't biblically part with water tanks and illegitimately taking up tithes from their members. Please do tell, since there are scarcely 150 mid-Acts churches in all the US, why are they always penny-less? FWIW, Bullinger was best known for sadly taking an Acts 28 (ultra dispensational) view at the turn of the century and very late in life (80+) when he was swayed by Sir Robert Anderson and Charles Welsh. It was this aged tired old soul that Ironside posthumously wrote against in "Wrongly Dividing the Word of Truth: Ultra-Dispensationalism Examined" (1938). But did you know his first edition of "sailing with Paul" did not even support Baptism? Did you also know he denied it later?
@@kwpctek9190 Hummm...Peter didn't preach "Grace"? You are, along with your fellow Hyperdispensationalist false teaching brethren sadly mistaken - 1 Peter 1:2-4 makes it very plain that Peter did in fact preach Grace - " according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, by the sanctifying work of the Spirit, to obey Jesus Christ and be sprinkled with His blood: May grace and peace be multiplied to you. Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to obtain an inheritance which is imperishable, undefiled, and will not fade away, reserved in heaven for you." Further, Peter preached salvation by the blood of Jesus Christ by God's free mercy and new birth. Same Gospel Paul preached as witnessed by the following - "...and regard the patience of our Lord as salvation; just as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given him, wrote to you, as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things, in which there are some things that are hard to understand, which the untaught and unstable distort, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction. You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, be on your guard so that you are not carried away by the error of unscrupulous people and lose your own firm commitment, but grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To Him be the glory, both now and to the day of eternity. Amen." - 2 Peter 3:15-18. - NASB. And it matters little that Paul confronted Peter about his misbehavior. You Mid-Acts people read into that situation way too much and misapply the lesson you should learn. Oh, and BTW - an apt description of you and your perversion of the Gospel is found in these verses - "untaught and unstable and unscrupulous people" - that's you to the core. In fact, you people preach another gospel that does not save. Period! And that's why I say you and the message you bring are anathema!
@@SAOProductions1955 That was not in the Acts transitional period and Peter's epistle was written long after Paul set him straight. By the time 2 Peter's written, he's got no answers to his little flock Jewish Kingdom saints as to why their promised Kingdom never came, so in chapter 3 old Peter's acquiescing deeper questions to the writings of brother Paul. I should have known you'd persist in casting pejoratives, since your channel playlist shows a lot of tip-toeing through the TULIP. Imagine that, a dictatorial cosmic puppet-master is the highest thought you can muster about the God of heaven. I might as well go hold debate with a 4-year old.
@@kwpctek9190 There is absolutely no reason to think there was anything as a "transitional period" in the preaching of the Gospel by the first century church - nor is there any reason to think that Peter preached a different Gospel than the one Paul proclaimed. Like so many others of your Hyperdispensationlist framework, you're the ones who follow a distorted use of the Scriptures. if you guys are correct in your hermneutical endeavors, for over nineteen years the church has missed this conclusion that you people have come to most recently that says there are at least two gospels and may be as many as four as C. T. Stam and others purport. There is only one Gospel of the Kingdom and even Paul was preaching the Kingdom and the need for repentance right up to the very end of his life. (Acts 28) So if Paul was given the "mystery" that somehow superseded even the teachings of Jesus on the subject, looks like your theological hero missed it too.
![Grace Bible Church [www.rightlydividing.org]](http://yt3.ggpht.com/ytc/AIdro_nSDBwyABqv8SVMEVno3QYuH5hV9y3nAl9f92PkQMhRRA=s48-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj)
Pastor Bruscha, thank you so much for the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery given to the Apostle Paul as found in the King James Bible. I’m so grateful to have stumbled across this teaching. The truth of Christ still stands. Amen.
Grace be unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ. 🙏
I love your videos!
That makes me happy, check out channel for more that we have uploaded.
You Hyperdispensationalist's/Bullinger-ites (or mid-Acts people) have done a great disservice & harm to the body of Christ. ἀνάθεμα
How is that anathema? And how it it, all you can do is gracelessly sling mud at brothers who trust your Savior? Both those terms you used are H A Ironside's pejoratives.. so please say why Baptism is absolutely required. Also, please state when Peter ever preached salvation by grace alone apart from the law prior to his Acts 15 reconsideration (forced on him by Paul) to not foist laws and circumcision upon the gentiles.. It would seem Acts 2 folks just can't biblically part with water tanks and illegitimately taking up tithes from their members. Please do tell, since there are scarcely 150 mid-Acts churches in all the US, why are they always penny-less?
FWIW, Bullinger was best known for sadly taking an Acts 28 (ultra dispensational) view at the turn of the century and very late in life (80+) when he was swayed by Sir Robert Anderson and Charles Welsh. It was this aged tired old soul that Ironside posthumously wrote against in "Wrongly Dividing the Word of Truth: Ultra-Dispensationalism Examined" (1938). But did you know his first edition of "sailing with Paul" did not even support Baptism? Did you also know he denied it later?
@@kwpctek9190 Hummm...Peter didn't preach "Grace"? You are, along with your fellow Hyperdispensationalist false teaching brethren sadly mistaken - 1 Peter 1:2-4 makes it very plain that Peter did in fact preach Grace - " according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, by the sanctifying work of the Spirit, to obey Jesus Christ and be sprinkled with His blood: May grace and peace be multiplied to you.
Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to obtain an inheritance which is imperishable, undefiled, and will not fade away, reserved in heaven for you." Further, Peter preached salvation by the blood of Jesus Christ by God's free mercy and new birth. Same Gospel Paul preached as witnessed by the following - "...and regard the patience of our Lord as salvation; just as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given him, wrote to you, as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things, in which there are some things that are hard to understand, which the untaught and unstable distort, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction. You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, be on your guard so that you are not carried away by the error of unscrupulous people and lose your own firm commitment, but grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To Him be the glory, both now and to the day of eternity. Amen." - 2 Peter 3:15-18. - NASB. And it matters little that Paul confronted Peter about his misbehavior. You Mid-Acts people read into that situation way too much and misapply the lesson you should learn. Oh, and BTW - an apt description of you and your perversion of the Gospel is found in these verses - "untaught and unstable and unscrupulous people" - that's you to the core. In fact, you people preach another gospel that does not save. Period! And that's why I say you and the message you bring are anathema!
@@SAOProductions1955 That was not in the Acts transitional period and Peter's epistle was written long after Paul set him straight. By the time 2 Peter's written, he's got no answers to his little flock Jewish Kingdom saints as to why their promised Kingdom never came, so in chapter 3 old Peter's acquiescing deeper questions to the writings of brother Paul. I should have known you'd persist in casting pejoratives, since your channel playlist shows a lot of tip-toeing through the TULIP. Imagine that, a dictatorial cosmic puppet-master is the highest thought you can muster about the God of heaven. I might as well go hold debate with a 4-year old.
@@kwpctek9190 There is absolutely no reason to think there was anything as a "transitional period" in the preaching of the Gospel by the first century church - nor is there any reason to think that Peter preached a different Gospel than the one Paul proclaimed. Like so many others of your Hyperdispensationlist framework, you're the ones who follow a distorted use of the Scriptures. if you guys are correct in your hermneutical endeavors, for over nineteen years the church has missed this conclusion that you people have come to most recently that says there are at least two gospels and may be as many as four as C. T. Stam and others purport. There is only one Gospel of the Kingdom and even Paul was preaching the Kingdom and the need for repentance right up to the very end of his life. (Acts 28) So if Paul was given the "mystery" that somehow superseded even the teachings of Jesus on the subject, looks like your theological hero missed it too.