Deep dive into Docker storage drivers

Montreal, April 13, 2015 - Jerome Petazzoni presents how aufs and btrfs drivers compare from a high-level perspective, explaining their pros and cons. This will help the audience to make more informed decisions when picking the most appropriate driver for their workloads.
* Jérôme Petazzoni: sflx.ca/jpet
* Slides: sflx.ca/jpdock
* MP53: sflx.ca/mp53e
Recorded and edited live by @ChristianAubry at Montréal-Python 53 (Sanctified Terabit) with a little help from Savoir-faire Linux (sflx.ca/jobs).

[@jadia]

Jerome's talks and articles are extremely informative. I've learn a lot because of his contribution. Thanks for the video.

[@ajnbin]

Thanks a lot for te video, Jerome makes complex stuff very simple!

[@hwkd5416]

I enjoyed the talk and learned a lot! Great presentation.

[@yakulgarg9588]

He said in AUFS performance,tuning :- when there are lots of packages installed in python PATH, importing them would require traversing through each layer for each file, but if we have installed the packages ourselves after taking the python image as the base container, wouldn't those be present in the write(top) layer? Can someone clear that up for me? But, Nice video :)

[@dailysongsradio8202]

63 likes? It should be 63 dislikes!!! Those people just talk. They don't know how to implement stuff. How to implement aufs, zfs... in practice Would be a good video. The trash he was talking about are here docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/dockerd/#daemon-storage-driver

[@hungmol5989]

How do you know that they don't know to implement the storage drivers stuff? Are you suggesting we reinvent the wheel instead of using it?

[@ideaparkcc]

you can you talk, no can no fucking speak.