Yeah Northern Ireland is part of the UK but NOT part of Britain! EVEN Scottish and Welsh don’t like being referred to as British and officially they ARE British!!😂😂
Although Emma is not European, the movie is British, so she gets some points for that... apart from her wonderful performance. If Sandra doesn't win here, it's the end for her. An Emily Blunt win here, or at the Oscars, would feel exactly like when Jamie Lee Curtis won last year 🫨
I think that as good as Sandra is in Anatomy, it's nothing I haven't seen begore and Emma is just on another level. Her growth is perfectly callibrated througout the movie. Her movements, the way she uses objects, the way she talks are all maturing, while still undoubtedly being the same character. Also, she has such a juvenile glance at the start and over the course of the movie she lets intelligence seep into her eyes. Especially at the end of the movie when you think back at were she started and how she convincingly got there is fantastic. I don't think anyone else could have played the part as convincingly as she did. That doesn't necessarily mean I think she'll win (especially since she has already won before and it's a fantasy movie), but I hope she does.
for me Sandra Huller performance is better than Emma Stone...Sandra has more depth and the acting is so realistic unlike Emma's who's acting is very mechanical
I’m with Sandra Huller for Best Actress. Much as I agree with a lot of what you both said, you were a bit scant in your praise for her performance in Anatomy of a Fall which I personally found riveting from start to finish. Plus Emma Stone is a recent winner and Sandra Huller has two acting nominations this year. I found her equally riveting in The Zone of Interest which I happened to see a week apart from Anatomy of a Fall. Seeing those performances close together reinforced my conviction that she is due an award this year.
I do, too. Although Emma is not European, the movie is British, so she gets some points for that... apart from her wonderful performance. If Sandra doesn't win here, it's the end for her.
I've got a question for anyone here. I'm a fairly new SAG-AFTRA member (I'm in the AFTRA part, I work in radio, which is why I'm clueless) my votes are due in a few days, and I'm quickly trying to catch up. How am I supposed to interpret "Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture"? I can see three ways of parsing this: 1. The best ensemble performance, the one that really feels like everyone is part of the same universe and telling the same story; 2. The movie with the greatest number of great actors doing great work; or 3. I shouldn't take the wording of the category too seriously and just think of this as SAG's version of the Best Picture award. It makes a difference, because I would vote for different movies depending on whether I'm just judging the acting in a certain way as opposed to picking what I think is the best film overall. What do you think? I welcome all opinions.
Another radio SAG-AFTRA member here. Personally I take "Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture" literally. I focus on the overall performances, not necessarily the movie as a whole. But I think a lot of voters view this category as SAG's Best Picture and vote accordingly. Just trust your gut and have fun!
Actually the conversation has moved towards Poor Things being divisive among people & Industry members, explains Hüller talk being an upset. Several awards pundits have remarked Thing’s “weird” sensibilities maybe is beginning to divide the older Academy voters. They mentioned it in more than one GoldDerby videos. Doing well at the Box Office doesn’t really count the amount of walk-outs the film has, so that’s not entirely true.
@@Fallen616 The "divisive talk is among a handful of influential folks on line, and a bunch of ratings bombers on film review sites that still could not push the film off its high perch (eg, 8.4 IMDb). Furthermore, its been debunked by Emma Stone herself, who has been an absolute charm in interviews and awards acceptance speeches throughout the hot streak of wins that started with the Golden Globes.
@@reeldeal3227Uh no, there’s been several incidences of the film being a divisive split-among critics & pundits circles. Ignore the general audience, Poor Things is starting to or becoming a hit or Miss for people, it’s European sensibilities will do great for BAFTA, but SAG? Awardsdaily posted a podcast today & there said there’s been chatter that PT is starting to become that divisive film where you love it or hate it. Since you mentioned Stone, yes, she’s been out campaigning & trying to justify her film as a feminist film against the backlash(inferring it’s more exploitative than empowering). That’s another clue, she’s having to speak & defend her film, they mentioned as I said on GoldDerby-I’m not making it up. Making do more research than living idly in your echo chamber.
@@Fallen616 I saw it and I do not see the exploitation argument. If it is divisive, I must be on the love side because I would rather see that win best picture than Oppenheimer and think Emma deserves best actress.
@@reeldeal3227No, the conversations are being had in critics & pundits circles, that Poor Things is becoming this divisive, hit-or-miss for some. The pundits at GoldDerby have mentioned it several times & a podcast episode from Awardsdaily referenced the blowback from several industry members. PT has very European sensibilities whereas actual Industry voters can become hesitant for a film where it’s sexual themes flirt w/ children’s minds(Actual critic line, not mine). Stone is magnetic on the campaign trail but she’s also having to defend the film from “exploitative” claims. Whether it’s front runner fatigue or the novelty shine has wore but the criticisms can follow it all the way to Oscar night.
Oppenheimer is going to win big at BAFTA and I’ll be very happy for the wins it’ll receive. Thank you for the video, hope you’re doing well and will have a great weekend. Take care!
I think you’re right. The BAFTAs, being the BRITISH Academy of Film and Television Awards do sometimes prefer films by Brits and Oppenheimer is one of the year’s obvious favourites.
I am ALL IN with Hüller all the way. Emma was superb, but Hüller, OMG she had me on the edge of my seat, with all mixed emotions, OH JESUS. No matter what, Hüller and Gretta Lee are my best performances of 2023
If All of Us Strangers wins anything at the BAFTAs, I'll be so happy. That was my favorite film of the year. It really stayed with me. Same goes for Past Lives. That was my second favorite.
An Irish born actor has never won lead actor at the oscars. So the idea of 'home vanatge' is ridiculous. The main pulling point is the biopic performance.
Another great video Brian. After too much consideration, here are my winners: FILM - Oppenheimer DIRECTOR - Christopher Nolan ACTOR - Cillian Murphy ACTRESS - Sandra Hüller SUPPORTING ACTOR - Robert Downey Jr. SUPPORTING ACTRESS - Da’Vine Joy Randolph ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY - Anatomy Of A Fall ADAPTED SCREENPLAY - Poor Things
Why does it seems you guys forgot the whole nomination process is different and that thats the reason this many omissions happen. Many of them don't make sense... But dont say "how did that happen", being an awards contender :)
I really do not understand where all the talk for Barbie to win Screenplay is coming from. The only way I can rationalize it is that the Academy will throw Barbie a sympathy award in screenplay since it does not look likely to win any other above the line award. Its a way to keep the legions of Barbie fans happy while also awarding Greta Gerwig and Noah Baumbach - who are very talented writers but Barbie is easily their weakest film. Its ridiculous that Barbie is even nominated for screenplay given that is has mediocre writing at best. Barbie started off with an interesting dynamic of the human + doll connection and how the human's emotions are impacting Barbie in Barbie world, but it completely abandoned this concept once Barbie reaches the real world and never fully explores it. The whole Mattel executives plotline barely had any impact on the movie (apart from giving us a silly hide-and-seek game in the offices and and an even worse car chase scene). The only good thing about the Mattel plotline was the old woman who Barbie meets, but it doesn't make up for the rest of the wasted time. The dialogue felt very surface-level and nothing special there, even the monologue by America Ferrera, which was just too direct. There are so many better ways to include social commentary in a film, ask Parasite - a worthy Screenplay winner among other awards. At the end of the day, Barbie was an average crowd-pleaser film with some good moments of humor, but not at all worthy of Oscar wins in the above-the-line categories, especially not when other brilliantly written films like Poor Things, Oppenheimer, KOTFM, American Fiction exist.
RDJ >> JOAQUIN PHOENIX. I AM READY TO BET THAT RDJ WILL WIN BAFTA FOR BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR. AH LAUGH WELL WHO LAUGHS LAST at those who say that Rdj doesn't know how to act after Endgame .
Although Emma is not European, the movie is British, so she gets some points for that... apart from her wonderful performance. If Sandra doesn't win here, it's the end for her.
My BAFTA Predictions Best Picture- Oppenheimer Best Actor- Cillian Murphy (Oppenheimer) Best Actress- Sandra Huller (Anatomy of a Fall) Best Supporting Actor- Robert Downey, Jr. (Oppenheimer) Best Supporting Actress- Da' Vine Joy Randolph (The Holdovers) Best Director- Christopher Nolan (Oppenheimer) Best Original Screenplay- Anatomy of a Fall Best Adapted Screenplay- Poor Things
Great list guys. I’m pretty much in agreement with either of you. FILM - Oppenheimer DIRECTOR - Christopher Nolan ACTOR- Cillian Murphy (so help me if the Brits let me down here especially after missing Andrew Scott too) ACTRESS - Sandra Hüller SUPPORTING ACTOR - Robert Downey Jr SUPPORTING ACTRESS - Da’Vine Joy Randolph ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY - Anatomy of a Fall ADAPTED SCREENPLAY - Oppenheimer (would be so stoked for All of us Strangers too)
Its so sad not seeing charles melton in the conversation anymore. At the beginning of award season ,i thought charles melton was gonna be big competition for robert downing jr. The way may December fizzled out.
I saw both performances of Sandra Huller and Emma Stone...in my opinion Sandra gave a better performance than Emma. Sandra's acting is superb that even if she doesn't speak you can see it in her eyes...while Emma Stone is good also but the acting feels mechanical...she is like the Bad Barbie version.
Cillian Murphy is Irish NOT British.
(Irish people will, quite rightly, get genuinely angry and upset if you call them British)
Yeah Northern Ireland is part of the UK but NOT part of Britain! EVEN Scottish and Welsh don’t like being referred to as British and officially they ARE British!!😂😂
Cillian is not from the uk, he’s Irish ☘️
According to the baftas it’s the same thing 🤭
But Northern Ireland is part of the UK. If you're referring to Cillian Murphy not being British, then you would be correct
@@oblebrunhe's from Cork
@@oblebrun he’s from the Republic of Ireland. Seriously
If an Irish person is popular, we British will claim them. Don’t think we won’t, just look at Pierce Brosnan.
Guys. Cillian is not from the UK.
❤
From Ireland though which is close to home
He’s undeniably Irish but indisputably big in the UK, not least as a result of his performance in Peaky Blinders.
He is. ireland is part of Uk
@@JayZinger Ireland hasn't been part of the UK since 1921
@@JayZinger ok Jay 😆
Murphy is from Ireland. Rosamund pike should win to show the Oscars they completely snubbed her. I hope mulligan wins too , but I doubt it
Although Emma is not European, the movie is British, so she gets some points for that... apart from her wonderful performance. If Sandra doesn't win here, it's the end for her.
An Emily Blunt win here, or at the Oscars, would feel exactly like when Jamie Lee Curtis won last year 🫨
I think that as good as Sandra is in Anatomy, it's nothing I haven't seen begore and Emma is just on another level. Her growth is perfectly callibrated througout the movie. Her movements, the way she uses objects, the way she talks are all maturing, while still undoubtedly being the same character. Also, she has such a juvenile glance at the start and over the course of the movie she lets intelligence seep into her eyes. Especially at the end of the movie when you think back at were she started and how she convincingly got there is fantastic. I don't think anyone else could have played the part as convincingly as she did. That doesn't necessarily mean I think she'll win (especially since she has already won before and it's a fantasy movie), but I hope she does.
Love Huller, but if Emma doesn't win I will be shocked. Can she ever top that performance ? No one could.
for me Sandra Huller performance is better than Emma Stone...Sandra has more depth and the acting is so realistic unlike Emma's who's acting is very mechanical
I think Sandra was better than Emma, but love both
@@eliudsosa2829+ Stone have all an BAFTA/Oscar
@@harmenmoes9138 So? If she gave the best performance, she should win.
no one could? she wasn't even better than cate's performance in tar lol
I’m with Sandra Huller for Best Actress. Much as I agree with a lot of what you both said, you were a bit scant in your praise for her performance in Anatomy of a Fall which I personally found riveting from start to finish. Plus Emma Stone is a recent winner and Sandra Huller has two acting nominations this year. I found her equally riveting in The Zone of Interest which I happened to see a week apart from Anatomy of a Fall. Seeing those performances close together reinforced my conviction that she is due an award this year.
This could be Sandra Hüller's best chance, But I think Emma Stone will win.
I do, too. Although Emma is not European, the movie is British, so she gets some points for that... apart from her wonderful performance. If Sandra doesn't win here, it's the end for her.
@@jonathanvelazquezph.d.2719 Exactly!
I've got a question for anyone here. I'm a fairly new SAG-AFTRA member (I'm in the AFTRA part, I work in radio, which is why I'm clueless) my votes are due in a few days, and I'm quickly trying to catch up. How am I supposed to interpret "Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture"? I can see three ways of parsing this: 1. The best ensemble performance, the one that really feels like everyone is part of the same universe and telling the same story; 2. The movie with the greatest number of great actors doing great work; or 3. I shouldn't take the wording of the category too seriously and just think of this as SAG's version of the Best Picture award. It makes a difference, because I would vote for different movies depending on whether I'm just judging the acting in a certain way as opposed to picking what I think is the best film overall. What do you think? I welcome all opinions.
2, but 3 is also valid. Vote for the movie you preferred and don't think too much about it ;)
Another radio SAG-AFTRA member here. Personally I take "Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture" literally. I focus on the overall performances, not necessarily the movie as a whole. But I think a lot of voters view this category as SAG's Best Picture and vote accordingly. Just trust your gut and have fun!
Baftas love a good war film.
They love historical dramas
Costume dramas.
Openheimer is definitely winning best picture at the bafta
Oppenheimer >>> Killer of the Flower Moon & Everything everywhere all at once
That Cameron fella is adorable
Poor things is doing so well at the box office. Emma stone has best actress in.the bag.
The hype for killers of the flower moon has died.
Actually the conversation has moved towards Poor Things being divisive among people & Industry members, explains Hüller talk being an upset. Several awards pundits have remarked Thing’s “weird” sensibilities maybe is beginning to divide the older Academy voters. They mentioned it in more than one GoldDerby videos. Doing well at the Box Office doesn’t really count the amount of walk-outs the film has, so that’s not entirely true.
@@Fallen616 The "divisive talk is among a handful of influential folks on line, and a bunch of ratings bombers on film review sites that still could not push the film off its high perch (eg, 8.4 IMDb). Furthermore, its been debunked by Emma Stone herself, who has been an absolute charm in interviews and awards acceptance speeches throughout the hot streak of wins that started with the Golden Globes.
@@reeldeal3227Uh no, there’s been several incidences of the film being a divisive split-among critics & pundits circles. Ignore the general audience, Poor Things is starting to or becoming a hit or Miss for people, it’s European sensibilities will do great for BAFTA, but SAG? Awardsdaily posted a podcast today & there said there’s been chatter that PT is starting to become that divisive film where you love it or hate it. Since you mentioned Stone, yes, she’s been out campaigning & trying to justify her film as a feminist film against the backlash(inferring it’s more exploitative than empowering). That’s another clue, she’s having to speak & defend her film, they mentioned as I said on GoldDerby-I’m not making it up. Making do more research than living idly in your echo chamber.
@@Fallen616 I saw it and I do not see the exploitation argument. If it is divisive, I must be on the love side because I would rather see that win best picture than Oppenheimer and think Emma deserves best actress.
@@reeldeal3227No, the conversations are being had in critics & pundits circles, that Poor Things is becoming this divisive, hit-or-miss for some. The pundits at GoldDerby have mentioned it several times & a podcast episode from Awardsdaily referenced the blowback from several industry members. PT has very European sensibilities whereas actual Industry voters can become hesitant for a film where it’s sexual themes flirt w/ children’s minds(Actual critic line, not mine).
Stone is magnetic on the campaign trail but she’s also having to defend the film from “exploitative” claims. Whether it’s front runner fatigue or the novelty shine has wore but the criticisms can follow it all the way to Oscar night.
Brian looks happy while he is talking with Cameron
Thank you for your amazing shows!❤
Brian, we love it when you say 'B' words like your name, BAFTA and "Barbie." Cameron's dimple!
Please do not insult the entire country of Ireland by saying Cillian Murphy is British. He is NOT British. He is a proud Irish man.
Oppenheimer is going to win big at BAFTA and I’ll be very happy for the wins it’ll receive. Thank you for the video, hope you’re doing well and will have a great weekend. Take care!
I think you’re right. The BAFTAs, being the BRITISH Academy of Film and Television Awards do sometimes prefer films by Brits and Oppenheimer is one of the year’s obvious favourites.
The baftas love claire foy (first man, all of strangers)
The oscars hate claire foy
I also love Claire Foy. In my opinion, the oscars are wrong on this one.
My wife is in the Emily camp for Baftas I am in Da'Vine. I am RDJ and she is Dominic Sessa otherwise we agree so it makes it watchable for us.
RDJ🖤👿 V JOAQUIN PHOENIX🤡👿
Team RDJ and Da’Vine 🙌🏼
Cillian Murphy famously moved his kids from the UK back to Ireland cause they were starting to sound too much like posh English kids
Your chuckles are so on point 😂😂
I am ALL IN with Hüller all the way. Emma was superb, but Hüller, OMG she had me on the edge of my seat, with all mixed emotions, OH JESUS. No matter what, Hüller and Gretta Lee are my best performances of 2023
If All of Us Strangers wins anything at the BAFTAs, I'll be so happy. That was my favorite film of the year. It really stayed with me. Same goes for Past Lives. That was my second favorite.
Omg I love Cameron! Such a cutie!
I'm predicting Oppenheimer, Nolan, Huller, Murphy, Blunt and Mescal. Screenplays = Anatomy of a Fall and Oppenheimer.
An Irish born actor has never won lead actor at the oscars. So the idea of 'home vanatge' is ridiculous. The main pulling point is the biopic performance.
Another great video Brian. After too much consideration, here are my winners:
FILM - Oppenheimer
DIRECTOR - Christopher Nolan
ACTOR - Cillian Murphy
ACTRESS - Sandra Hüller
SUPPORTING ACTOR - Robert Downey Jr.
SUPPORTING ACTRESS - Da’Vine Joy Randolph
ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY - Anatomy Of A Fall
ADAPTED SCREENPLAY - Poor Things
Great video! I think Cameron’s dead wrong about actress, but great video!
I feel like we could get some cool outlier wins here. Still hoping for a win for Pike just because… drama
Why does it seems you guys forgot the whole nomination process is different and that thats the reason this many omissions happen. Many of them don't make sense... But dont say "how did that happen", being an awards contender :)
If Emily blunt wins an academy award for that performance, I’ll lose completely faith in humanity.
I agree. Her performance was so weak. She wasn't given enough to work with imo
Still be better than Jamie Lee Curtis winning for EEAAO.
@ladonnakalala Nolan seems to have a problem with female characters in his films.
@@tofansultani8472 No, she would be just as terrible!
@@iamsoverybored878 well I thought Murph in Interstellar was well written female character.
I really do not understand where all the talk for Barbie to win Screenplay is coming from.
The only way I can rationalize it is that the Academy will throw Barbie a sympathy award in screenplay since it does not look likely to win any other above the line award. Its a way to keep the legions of Barbie fans happy while also awarding Greta Gerwig and Noah Baumbach - who are very talented writers but Barbie is easily their weakest film. Its ridiculous that Barbie is even nominated for screenplay given that is has mediocre writing at best.
Barbie started off with an interesting dynamic of the human + doll connection and how the human's emotions are impacting Barbie in Barbie world, but it completely abandoned this concept once Barbie reaches the real world and never fully explores it.
The whole Mattel executives plotline barely had any impact on the movie (apart from giving us a silly hide-and-seek game in the offices and and an even worse car chase scene). The only good thing about the Mattel plotline was the old woman who Barbie meets, but it doesn't make up for the rest of the wasted time.
The dialogue felt very surface-level and nothing special there, even the monologue by America Ferrera, which was just too direct. There are so many better ways to include social commentary in a film, ask Parasite - a worthy Screenplay winner among other awards.
At the end of the day, Barbie was an average crowd-pleaser film with some good moments of humor, but not at all worthy of Oscar wins in the above-the-line categories, especially not when other brilliantly written films like Poor Things, Oppenheimer, KOTFM, American Fiction exist.
Oppenheimer will sweep I know that. I am hoping Cillian wins best actor over Paul Giamatti.
Again I want chaos.
RDJ >> JOAQUIN PHOENIX.
I AM READY TO BET THAT RDJ WILL WIN BAFTA FOR BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR. AH LAUGH WELL WHO LAUGHS LAST at those who say that Rdj doesn't know how to act after Endgame .
I hope Saltburn wins a few categories. It was a great film, and it was much talked about . A brilliant observation of the times in Britain.
I think Sandra Huller will win bafta for best actress.
They are pure personal dreams if we go for something realistic, Emma Stone has it in the bag
Although Emma is not European, the movie is British, so she gets some points for that... apart from her wonderful performance. If Sandra doesn't win here, it's the end for her.
My BAFTA Predictions
Best Picture- Oppenheimer
Best Actor- Cillian Murphy (Oppenheimer)
Best Actress- Sandra Huller (Anatomy of a Fall)
Best Supporting Actor- Robert Downey, Jr. (Oppenheimer)
Best Supporting Actress- Da' Vine Joy Randolph (The Holdovers)
Best Director- Christopher Nolan (Oppenheimer)
Best Original Screenplay- Anatomy of a Fall
Best Adapted Screenplay- Poor Things
Paul Giamatti is going to win
love the earrings but the do has to go.
Great list guys. I’m pretty much in agreement with either of you.
FILM - Oppenheimer
DIRECTOR - Christopher Nolan
ACTOR- Cillian Murphy (so help me if the Brits let me down here especially after missing Andrew Scott too)
ACTRESS - Sandra Hüller
SUPPORTING ACTOR - Robert Downey Jr
SUPPORTING ACTRESS - Da’Vine Joy Randolph
ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY - Anatomy of a Fall
ADAPTED SCREENPLAY - Oppenheimer (would be so stoked for All of us Strangers too)
RDJ & CILLIAN MURPHY VS JOAQUIN PHOENIX.
JOAQUIN Phoenix/Joker:😂🤣😈🤡
Its so sad not seeing charles melton in the conversation anymore.
At the beginning of award season ,i thought charles melton was gonna be big competition for robert downing jr.
The way may December fizzled out.
And Carrey Mulligan end up victorious. Lol
I saw both performances of Sandra Huller and Emma Stone...in my opinion Sandra gave a better performance than Emma. Sandra's acting is superb that even if she doesn't speak you can see it in her eyes...while Emma Stone is good also but the acting feels mechanical...she is like the Bad Barbie version.
I heard Stone’s performance being described as slap-stick acting which, I can see. But great role.
Lyli Gladstone winners
That hair is annoyingly distracting.
Awkward
Lyli Gladstone winners