“They weren’t even celebrating after the fight.” Cherneka Johnson & Nina Hughes Post Fight Presser
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 тра 2024
- Wild scenes at the Nina Hughes v Cherneka Johnson fight where Nina Hughes was incorrectly called the winner before being recalled in Cherneka Johnson's favour on the Vasiliy Lomachenko v George Kambosos undercard.
Remember to like, comment and subscribe for more boxing content.
#boxing #hughesjohnson #lomachenkokambosos
No robbery here congrats to the winner
Dont matter who you ask who won the judges gave it to the home fighter so all you can do is get the rematch on
The following controversy was more interesting than the fight
Another black eye to the sport of boxing
Everything I’ve seen has Nina as a clear loser
You say you won use the legend in your own mind 😄😜
Rematch get paid again win again crack on
Reeks of a fixed result from what I saw
You should watch the fight. It wasn't close. All of the commentators had it for Sugar as well. The announcer is just a moron. He announced the scores wrong in the previous fight too.
Nina lost.
@@babyyoda2219you know commentators can be bias right 😂 but yeah 💯 fixed unless your an Australian 🇦🇺 then it’s not fixed,
Nina lost 💥💯
@@trojanboxing9873 Generally not all 3 commentators, the ref, compubox, and 2 judges 🤣 watch the fight again and get real.
What a robbery, disappointing for the UK gal.
Why no drug testing?
Coz not every company does it
She won, stop crying and begging
Because they tried to cheat her and they told them before camp started that no drug testing will be done so gives either fighter the green light to cheat.
she literally said she took a drug test
@@thephantomzoneboxing but said they wasn’t going to do drug test. A couple of weeks in the training. They said no drug test fight. So HAD TO DO A DRUG TEST WOULDN’T SURPRISE ME IF THAT IS A FAKE TEST.
Definitely a robbery
Did you see this fight? Sugar easy winner.
what fight were you watching?
gente tonta que no sabe de boxeo
Nah close fight but Nina lost
@@chuycasas9584 I could ask you the same question my guy
Everyone that thinks Nina won need to wake up and think before they speak they can say they are humble and shit like that but at the end of the day they sat there for 10 minutes crying and complaining I don’t know what else has to be said but sugar won no disrespect to Nina and the team she is a good fighter just wasn’t the better fighter at the end of the day.
Blatant robbery and the promotor is lying through his teeth. The only people around the world who think I’m this isn’t a robbery are casuals and Australians FACTS!! Wanted no DRUG TEST CHANGED THE JUDGES THEN THE PROMOTOR SAY NO I WANTED THE OTHER JUDGES AS THEY WAS BEETER TRYING TO PULL THE WOOL OVER THE FIGHTERS EYES. edie dropped her Lou picked her up probaly came up with a plan with edie by bunging him some money for her, the whole thing stinks. 😷 it worries me that some people are that delusional that they can’t see this.
Yeah, all 3 "casual" commentators (2 of which were pros), the ref, two judges, compubox, all in on it. Lol. You are the casual. Lol 🤣
@@babyyoda2219 top rank payed commentators it’s not unheard of is it, I used to watch boxing with the volume down because if the bias shit they splutter. Yes you are a casual you have got a clue what you’re talking about. Guaranteed if this shit happened on American soil and against an Australian fighter you would be saying exactly the same as the rest of the world.
@@babyyoda2219
Jeff horn v manny pacquiao
Maxi hughes v George kambosa jnr
Nina hughes v Chenika Johnson.
the 3 fights above speaks for it self corruption is ripe for Australian fighters.
@@trojanboxing9873 I guess you thought Maloney won too. 🤣
@@trojanboxing9873 stop with the nonsense. Sugar controlled the vast majority of that fight, landed more, was pushing Hughes back. Easy win for Sugar. All the commentators, the ref, entirety of Reddit, two judges had it for Sugar. You're just a sore loser.
It's not hard to read the name of the winner. It is definitely something suspicious and corrupt.