Tonight I'm Gonna Party Like Its 1939 - Dan Henry

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 120

  • @samdryden7944
    @samdryden7944 Рік тому

    I would like to relate my experience in buying this watch from Dan Henry. It was dead on arrival. I contacted the company at the weekend, knowing I would have to wait until Monday for a response. I got a reply same day, and was given a choice of taking the watch to a repair shop myself and being refunded the cost of the new battery, or sending it back to be repaired. I sent it back and they refunded the shipping and replaced the case because of an issue, as well as the battery. I was very impressed with this outstanding customer service.

  • @mikec3454
    @mikec3454 4 роки тому +28

    The people commenting "oh, but it's just a quartz" don't belong within the watch community. It is this exact mentality that adds toxicity and feeds fuel to the watch snobs around the world. I spent $7K CAD on a brand new Rolex 116000 four weeks ago; just a a few days ago I spent $340 CAD to buy the Dan Henry 1964. To say that a watch is somehow not worth looking at because it's quartz is such nonsense. I buy watches that bring joy when on the wrist. I decide which brands to support based on their history, their vision, sometimes marketing, and overall what they represent in the community. Dan Henry is doing an incredible thing for watch collectors everywhere.
    Just wait until the company grows and capital continues to come through the door, he's got some big plans up his sleeve I bet. I'm willing to give him my money now to support his efforts.

    • @wejpasadena1
      @wejpasadena1 4 роки тому

      Amen! I love good quartz watches with good design and I loathe mediocrity with automatic movements.

    • @IaMaPh1991
      @IaMaPh1991 4 роки тому

      I generally don't like quartz watches in general unless they put forth the effort to get a nice smooth sweep for their seconds hands, or forego a seconds hand entirely so that they don't immediately give away their nature. Otherwise, I don't bother and refuse to buy them; because, as another watch enthusiast is infamous for saying, "quartz watches dont have souls", but at the same time I won't diss anyone who legitimately enjoys them. On the bright side, at least they aren't digital watches... blech!
      But in regards to this watch, I feel like it's a bit inauthentic to make a line of vintage watches, especially chronographs, and then install them with a modern battery powered circuit movement that wouldn't have been used in the eras they are trying to invoke. At the very least, a hand wound movement would make more sense from that standpoint.

    • @mikec3454
      @mikec3454 4 роки тому

      @@IaMaPh1991 Your theory of putting a hand wound movement goes against everything Dan Henry is trying to accomplish here though. The watch is, what, $300 USD? Install a hand wound movement and you're likely closer to $800-1000.
      I asked Dan about mechanical movements on his Instagram, if you think he'd use something like the ST1901, think twice.
      And sorry, "quartz watches don't have souls" makes you sound even more like a fool. Just because one person said it doesn't make it accurate.

    • @IaMaPh1991
      @IaMaPh1991 4 роки тому

      @@mikec3454 If you like this watch and wish to buy it to enjoy it for yourself, then go ahead; I wholeheartedly encourage you to do so, as I would for anyone else who wishes to do the same. All collectors and collections are different and not everyone is going to go for the same things for various differing reasons.
      I simply will not buy this particular example, because it doesn't appeal to my personal sensibilities as a collector. Like they say, "don't like it, don't buy it", right?
      However, if another model is released that checks enough boxes for me, I'll consider throwing money at it.

    • @nearlyretired7005
      @nearlyretired7005 4 роки тому

      Be wise,don't buy a Rolex
      Everyone buys a Rolex,the sheep buy Rolex

  • @InspireWire
    @InspireWire 6 років тому +2

    Love this piece, it has so many features yet the dial doesnt look crowded 😊

  • @maidpretty
    @maidpretty 6 років тому +52

    World War II started in 1939. That was one hell of a party.

    • @greamespens1460
      @greamespens1460 6 років тому +3

      I believe from the Chinese perspective it was earlier 37 i think.

    • @greamespens1460
      @greamespens1460 6 років тому +1

      @MrAlphonsomango though Spain did not continue throughout WW2.

    • @Alejandro-me2py
      @Alejandro-me2py 6 років тому +3

      @@greamespens1460 we didn't. There was a volunteer division sent to the Eastern Front with the Germans, though.

    • @dodgydruid
      @dodgydruid 5 років тому +1

      Hmmm I don't think the loss of tens of millions of lives is much of a joke theme tbh

  • @KrisHandsome
    @KrisHandsome 6 років тому +2

    I love the 1939. I’ve got the 1968 and I think it looks incredible (my friend said it looked like something out of Star Wars), and I’m saving for the 1964 Gran Turismo chrono in the future. Great to see one of my favorite watch UA-camrs do a video on the new version of the 1939!

  • @chrismenes4995
    @chrismenes4995 6 років тому +5

    I agree and would pay an extra $20 for a sapphire crystal. As for quartz, my preference. I am a stickler for accuracy. My collection consists of various quartz models, atomic, satellite, solar, etc. I am particularly fond of my Certina Chronometer and my Bulova Precisionist

  • @tmorris93
    @tmorris93 4 роки тому +1

    As far as I can tell based on looking at the dial, I think this version of the 1939 offers only a telemeter and (spiral) tachymeter; the other version (first black dial, more recently a chocolate dial) does feature a pulsometer in addition to tel/tach

  • @fredlao6655
    @fredlao6655 6 років тому

    Was on vacation in the Philippines and I saw Dan Henry watch collection . I almost bought one . They are so beautiful . The dome glass on those watches .

  • @jasonm950
    @jasonm950 6 років тому +7

    Me too,I'll pay 20 or 25 extra for sapphire crystal,but all in all the timepiece is very well done.

  • @alexsdg3441
    @alexsdg3441 6 років тому +3

    Finally! a something unique and interesting watch that can really capture my attention all the way thru the review! It is a brilliant idea that Dan Henry came out with! Making a special watch thru the history of our lives, specially making them limited edition to the year in which the watch represents.
    In this 1939 watch, there are so many things are going on and surprisingly everything was put together quite well and even more amazingly they look retro & quite modern & hip!!!
    What a great job that Dan did.
    I understand that all of his watches are using Seiko or Miyota quarts movements which are not the luxury quarts brands, but proven and reliable ones. Also, it seems like he is not using sapphire glasses for his watches (probably to cut some cost for consumers) and that is also okay looking at the MSRP pricing.
    I am very impressed with the concept and how everything came out perfectly, mixing the history of the time yet making it relevant.... Great job Dan and great review Jody

  • @ofb7212
    @ofb7212 2 роки тому

    New version has sapphire crystal chocolate dial is beautiful. My favorite watch.

  • @Adam-Music-5
    @Adam-Music-5 6 років тому +1

    Enjoyed your review! I actually ordered the 1939 black dial last week...stupid post office strike is holding up delivery, but I am very excited. The choice between the two was razor thin

  • @stevenwymor1398
    @stevenwymor1398 6 років тому

    These types of watches usually aren’t my thing but this is the first chronograph that I could see actually using. It a very attractive package too. I hadn’t really looked at Dan Henry for some time. Thanks for reminding me that they’re out there. I like their design aesthetic. Well done Jody.

  • @47zero
    @47zero 6 років тому +14

    Nice one Jody, 9 minutes, you must be near maximum fact-cramming-factor, all delivered without any sense of panic 👍.
    I've ordered the 1970 40mm orange, got spooked when I heard they were nearly sold out, maybe don't hang about, especially now that you've properly woken up your audience to the brand ;)

  • @kevorknourian5442
    @kevorknourian5442 6 років тому

    Lovely time piece

  • @ericklinger6830
    @ericklinger6830 5 років тому +1

    Love the Doctor Who shirt. Also love the watch. Ordered a 1939&1970.

  • @dodgydruid
    @dodgydruid 5 років тому

    One of my Sekonda's is very very similar, having the blue hands and silvered dial and a 3 subdial Seiko quartz chrono movement which surprised the heck out of me seeing a Seiko movement in a lowly Sekonda. Does lack all the little ondial meters except the tachy on the outer ring. Even the case was kinda similar except the buttons which are bar type but the shape and slope of the case says to me someone at Sekonda HQ was quite impressed with the DH offering.

  • @YellowPinkie
    @YellowPinkie 4 роки тому

    Why has this video got so few likes? JOMW is my go-to for lockdown viewing!

  • @switzknight
    @switzknight 6 років тому +8

    Hello great review as always. Nice to see you showing interest in the Dan Henry products line. One small mistake however, the pulsometer is on the black dial variant not on the silver. Dan is going to release a new model in NYC on November 2 : the 1972. This time they are going for a sapphire crystal. Your wish is granted. That was fast ! Best regards.

  • @salvaph
    @salvaph Рік тому

    Love the doctor who shirt!

  • @FrankLavoy
    @FrankLavoy 4 роки тому

    Mr. Musgrove, even after 2 years, you convinced me to buy this version (1939). I was actually considering the 1964 version (Gran Turismo Chronograph - "Panda") and changed my mind after this review. Love the dial and most of all how the blue hands pop out.
    Great review! Thanks again.
    and BTW, @Mike C - I'm with you; we should all buy a watch that brings us joy when we wear it 👊🏼🙂

  • @mjbl3974
    @mjbl3974 6 років тому

    I've been going back and forth between the black and white dials. The pulsometer is only on the black dial. Unique, if not particularly useful, complications. I already own the larger size orange 1970. What a cool and interesting watch. Pull the trigger, you won't be disappointed.

  • @matthewsingh3254
    @matthewsingh3254 4 роки тому

    He just released a brand new updated version. It’s awesome.

  • @andreaiacolina
    @andreaiacolina 6 років тому

    Nice review! A few weeks ago I bought a DH 1964 Gran Turismo Chronograph and it looks great. My second choice anyway was this interesting 1939 model. Honestly all DH's models are very beautiful pieces.

  • @krustykrabb83
    @krustykrabb83 5 років тому

    Beautiful watch ⌚ very beautiful watch..

  • @TedCornish
    @TedCornish 6 років тому +8

    Ok you've found a quartz watch I like, boo to you Jody just boo ☺

  • @daspiper8941
    @daspiper8941 4 роки тому

    It's a nice looking watch.

  • @poorboy3136
    @poorboy3136 6 років тому +1

    Jody, watching this video and many others has made decide to cancel watch gang. This watch is really NICE and unique

  • @greenmarowak
    @greenmarowak 6 років тому

    It's nice to see somebody review this white variation of the 1939. Great review and fantastic capture of the dial!

  • @BarnOwl61
    @BarnOwl61 6 років тому +4

    Hallo Jody, i did find a good and cheaper quartz Chrono from Guanqin. See for yourself model GQ001-GQ006.
    This has a real Sapphire crystal for no more than 17 Euro's. It is great! It is in my collection now. Loved the review by the way!

  • @mariodavidpalacio
    @mariodavidpalacio 6 років тому

    Quirky little stuff is mostly what I like in watches. Balanced review as always. Thanks!

  • @markplayford5836
    @markplayford5836 6 років тому

    Hmmm quite nice if a little too busy for me. At least it won't cost chrono money for a service and you could argue that when the crystal has a few scratches and dings it will look even more vintage? Cracking review as ever sir.

  • @willfjeld1907
    @willfjeld1907 5 років тому +1

    Just one note of correction...take a closer look mate. That pouch is REAL leather and canvas, NOT faux pleather. I think the leather and canvas pouch is the perfect vintage feel to match the Dan Henry line.
    And it's quick and easier to use than the nicely buckled (faux leather) ones I have from Zelos.
    Also- a note on the "sapphire coated" mineral glass...
    I frequently wear my 3 Dan Henry watches (1939, 1962, & 1963). And, being the haunless gowk that I am, I've bonked them all plenty. But I'm pleased to report nary a single scratch so far. I've been wearing the '63 for nearly 2 years now, and it has a few nicks and scratches on the bezel but the glass is clean and clear as day one.

  • @DFW_AV8R
    @DFW_AV8R 6 років тому +1

    Love that dial. So retro cool. The 1963 is a contender too.

  • @DuxEtRex
    @DuxEtRex 6 років тому

    Can't wait to get me a Dan Ward

  • @juslitor
    @juslitor 3 роки тому

    No pulsometer on the silver dial, thats on the chocolate/black dial. Tachometer is nice though, usable for a bicycle.

  • @smirnoffvodka2618
    @smirnoffvodka2618 6 років тому

    why is iit that these watches (imo) always look best in white/silver with blue accents. i have the 'how many complications can you get for 50 dollars'. absolutely love the color scheme and the bit of chaos

  • @stusims6567
    @stusims6567 5 років тому

    Nice looking watch for the money. Love the blue hands, even if it’s just painted on. In the environment of a watch face, it probably doesn’t matter much anyway.

    • @mrjasonrowland
      @mrjasonrowland 4 роки тому

      Stu Sims According to the email I just got from Dan Henry, the hands are painted.

  • @tartanthing
    @tartanthing 6 років тому

    Jody am I imagining things or does the second hand sub dial pointer not mirror the centering of the left sub dial pointer on the track?

  • @rioriggs3568
    @rioriggs3568 6 років тому

    Love this watch! Good one J

  • @neilba1
    @neilba1 4 роки тому

    He's doing a good job Dan Henry....I think he's very fair with his pricing too. For me these are actually nicer than something like Christopher Ward with very similar specs....at a MUCH better price.

  • @davidmckenna1549
    @davidmckenna1549 6 років тому

    How much better is the K1 hardened crystal over a standard mineral crystal?

  • @3signets
    @3signets 5 років тому

    Great review very detailed.

  • @gregalonzo747
    @gregalonzo747 6 років тому +3

    How long does sapphire coating typically last?

    • @ThePearlyBumMC
      @ThePearlyBumMC 6 років тому +6

      I own the 1963. Don't buy into the hype, it nicks like a mineral crystal.

    • @gregalonzo747
      @gregalonzo747 6 років тому +1

      @@ThePearlyBumMC, thanks very much)))

    • @99thVeil
      @99thVeil 6 років тому +3

      I have managed to scratch mine quite easily. I think sapphire coating is just a marketing term. Jody would you be able to use your tester on it? Other than that the watch is amazing.

    • @mrjasonrowland
      @mrjasonrowland 4 роки тому

      Interesting. I wonder if the sapphire coating is what is actually chipping or scraping off and causing the nicks?

  • @daveho852
    @daveho852 6 років тому +1

    if not for its being a quartz i would have bought one from DH ... all very nice looking

  • @MrSlicer2424
    @MrSlicer2424 6 років тому +2

    Just one more wrist clock?

  • @poppad1187
    @poppad1187 6 років тому +1

    You should try that sapphire checker on that bad boy and see what happens?. Great looking piece. Dan Henry makes some stellar looking watches, a definite buy instead of those horrible fashion watches for the same price.

  • @neilpiper9889
    @neilpiper9889 4 роки тому

    I actually have a Kirovskie military watch made in 1939 at the 1st Moscow watch factory. Pie pan dial 44mm round dial tiny 14mm lugs. Big Onion crown. I have it on an old Bund strap from West Germany!
    18000bph movement which still keeps great time. I paid £70 for it.
    I didn't think they had mecaquartz in 1939. I pass on this.

  • @JJexciter
    @JJexciter 6 років тому

    These watches are really something. I prefer the other 1939 offering. The black gold and red dial looks amazing.
    I’ve been looking at the Dan Henry site over the past few months and tempted to get this or the 1964 Gran Turismo. Which is I believe 39mm- my sweet spot.
    It’s a bit of a bummer that it’s not mechanical so to be more accurate to the time period. And is 41mm accurate to the period as well?
    Great review, Jody, thanks! 👍

  • @Halfhoff
    @Halfhoff 6 років тому

    I've been thinking about the black version for a few weeks. But this one is also lovely. Love your reviews!

  • @xmassbesra22
    @xmassbesra22 6 років тому

    Your Subscriber from India 🤘

  • @craig2100
    @craig2100 6 років тому

    I like the wristband you're wearing

  • @issachunt3418
    @issachunt3418 6 років тому

    Blighty calling... Hmmm mineral/quartz.. love the 1970 styling watch. Ta for video :)

  • @FourIntoOne
    @FourIntoOne 6 років тому

    I have had most of the Dan Henry products. IMHO the killer of the range is the 1964 Gran Tourismo chrono - the rest are a little to large, particularly the 1947 which I cant wait to flip. I will be keeping the 1964.

  • @trappenweisseguy27
    @trappenweisseguy27 6 років тому

    What’s with the 5,7 and 11 numerals...or lack there of?.

  • @jamesbrent5533
    @jamesbrent5533 6 років тому

    Speaking of 70s divers I’ve got a question for the community. Why do so many 60s & 70s Swiss divers from “Value” watchmakers have the same case/case back with a diver under the surface, a fish, and ⭐️⭐️⭐️ on the case back and dial? Are they all mass produced cases that smaller makers used for their watches or are they different versions of one company’s watch? Are the ⭐️⭐️⭐️ a hallmark? Some of Orient’s watches also have it. Does anyone know?

  • @jabbathebum
    @jabbathebum 6 років тому +14

    What the flip does sapphire coating even mean in real life. I would love to see a scratch test.

    • @Joe-hl2ts
      @Joe-hl2ts 4 роки тому +1

      It'll do mostly the same as sapphire crystal would. So unless you're fond of scratching diamonds across your watch you should be fine.

    • @mrjasonrowland
      @mrjasonrowland 4 роки тому +1

      I have asked several Dan Henry owners on youtube their experience with the sapphire coated mineral. Many have since reported that the coating scratches as easily as mineral. A small few claim it works as well as sapphire.

  • @Zaiyetz
    @Zaiyetz 6 років тому +2

    Would love to see the review of the 1970!

  • @maxdalton1972
    @maxdalton1972 6 років тому

    Hey man, another great review. Hope you are having a great holoday and are suitably blootered back here in glasgow.

  • @williamparker2922
    @williamparker2922 6 років тому

    Great watch for the price.
    Great video and review.

  • @DrFrankLondon
    @DrFrankLondon 6 років тому

    The hands look like they are chemically blued and not painted, you usually see this on the junction between the hands, if they were painted they wouldn't be able to make them even enough where they are fastened to the movement. The two most used processes today is blued by heat and chemically blued, and chemically blued the cheaper option as it doesn't take as much precision as heat treating. I have never been a fan on DH and even though the watch looks fine and runs a well know Miyota movement, with such a domed mineral crystal it is a scratch magnet. I think I would rather go for a Graf Zeppelin a brand with more heritage , fabulous fit and finish, on the 8674-4 I think it is, a two eye chrono, you have one of the coolest lume jobs on the market and you can choose between auto and quartz, of course quartz much cheaper than the auto. They use mineral crystal as well, but it can easily be swapped out for a sapphire crystal as it is compatible with some Seiko aftermarket sapphire crystals.

    • @mrjasonrowland
      @mrjasonrowland 4 роки тому

      Frank Andre Holmestrand According to an email from Dan Henry himself, the hands are painted blue. They did an excellent job on them them for sure. He unfortunately didn’t answer my question about the durability of the sapphire coated mineral.

  • @powerofzeus
    @powerofzeus 6 років тому

    A 1970, 40mm ,coming in a few days :)

  • @KenSlager
    @KenSlager 6 років тому

    Much better. Obvious care in design.

  • @FitOutPost
    @FitOutPost 6 років тому

    I never saw a water resistance being depicted (on a caseback) as 50 MT instead of meters or simply m. Unless that was how it was done back in 1039. Nowadays MT means Metric Tons.

  • @pyclen
    @pyclen 6 років тому

    I own a 1939, black face, and hope you may get a 1947 or 1964 from DH in.
    Like your review of this and other watches.

  • @TravisClark1
    @TravisClark1 Рік тому

    Where are these manufactured??

  • @TheSweede12
    @TheSweede12 6 років тому

    I have considered buying a Dan Henry watch on several occasions however they are delivered by DHL who have a nasty habit of making large charges on the doorstep. If they used a different carrier I would already own the 1970.
    Great video again

  • @paulcrawford5437
    @paulcrawford5437 5 років тому

    Am I the only person that hates the more complicated movements? The only one I like is the 1947 but they are lovely looking watches.

  • @TheSpritz0
    @TheSpritz0 6 років тому +1

    Dan Henry was Vacheron Constantin's butler...

  • @woodyamsterdam
    @woodyamsterdam 6 років тому +3

    If only it was a manual wind...

    • @IaMaPh1991
      @IaMaPh1991 4 роки тому

      Same. Mechanical chronos or bust

  • @jackasskoev
    @jackasskoev 4 роки тому

    Where is the pulsometer???

  • @daytonaukpc9387
    @daytonaukpc9387 6 років тому

    If you check the web site you will see - CRYSTAL
    Sapphire coated double domed mineral glass with Anti-Reflective treatment.

  • @armandr1613
    @armandr1613 6 років тому +2

    Junkers Chrono probably a good alternative. Still crap quartz and mineral crystal but something to compare to price-wise.

  • @thewatchloungechris
    @thewatchloungechris 6 років тому

    These are def a lot of watch for the money.

  • @tahaibrahimi7846
    @tahaibrahimi7846 6 років тому

    Love it man, could you please try to get a hold of more Dan Henry watches. Love your reviews

  • @MrShoryuken1
    @MrShoryuken1 6 років тому +3

    Should have been an acrylic crystal for period style (if they aren't using sapphire). Mineral crystals shouldn't exist anymore, technology has made sapphire so cheap now. No excuse.

  • @theestimator
    @theestimator 6 років тому

    What do you make of LOCMAN , Italian watches ? .

  • @TinBin-Craig
    @TinBin-Craig 6 років тому

    nice watch for the price.. really like... do like the 1970 ones better

  • @syndicatedsatellite7288
    @syndicatedsatellite7288 6 років тому

    A review of a Ginautt watch by Jody would be cool.

  • @bravobear1844
    @bravobear1844 5 років тому +1

    Dang quarts, I could buy that movement for 30 bucks

    • @StephenCameron
      @StephenCameron 4 роки тому

      Dang quarts watches! I like my watches like I like my whisky! By the liter! Quarts... come on.

  • @maximilianfranz2158
    @maximilianfranz2158 4 роки тому

    I heard the Polish had a mad party going in 1939...

  • @blackburnheart
    @blackburnheart 2 роки тому

    Jordy, you buy so much chinese watches that aliexpress gifted you a complementary Mao bio. 😎

    • @JustOneMoreWatch
      @JustOneMoreWatch  2 роки тому +1

      Ha! I study Chinese history!

    • @blackburnheart
      @blackburnheart 2 роки тому

      @@JustOneMoreWatch Great! You can have a side channel: Just another chinese history fact. I will be the first suscriber 😁 PD: I will begin to listen a china history podcast.

  • @TheBadGuy1974
    @TheBadGuy1974 6 років тому +2

    Did you say HORRORogical?

  • @williamrhyne2639
    @williamrhyne2639 6 років тому

    Could you review the SEATEK ARGO? It looks like a great deal, check it out on Amazon :)

  • @progbl
    @progbl 6 років тому

    Please do the 1964

  • @HonestWatchReviewsHWR
    @HonestWatchReviewsHWR 6 років тому

    I love the look of the 1963 and 1968. Perhaps you could do a review on those sometime? 😛

  • @nicolashayek964
    @nicolashayek964 6 років тому +2

    just one more...quartz watch , needs somethhing more for the price movement relationship otherwise refreshing design

  • @Javi_C
    @Javi_C 6 років тому

    :)

  • @diesel5355
    @diesel5355 5 років тому

    Thats not a pulsometer

  • @martint8261
    @martint8261 4 роки тому +1

    ***Man's watch on a lady's strap*** I just recv'd my Dan Henry 1964 and although it is a somewhat decent watch, it is small. The area exposed inside the lugs look not finished and is the hallmark of a cheaply made case. Then there's the strap! Appalling to the point I can't wear it without feeling I am wearing my wife's watch. The strap tappers too much to the point that it feels like a child's toy watch and looks very small. Not a great feeling wearing it on the wrist. Too expensive to ship back so...

  • @raserx63
    @raserx63 6 років тому +2

    Great or not , Dude’s names on watches always reek of a 20$ fashion watch to me. Dan Henry , Jack Mason , Michael Kors, Donna Karan....see what I mean ?

  • @VegardLoke
    @VegardLoke 6 років тому

    (Mel: Jingle bells)
    Shitter watch
    Shitter watch
    Shilling everyday
    I know that it's a crappy watch, but I'll plug it anyway, HEY!
    Shitter watch
    Shitter watch
    Shilling everyday
    So please go spend your hard earned cash on some china quartz today!

  • @kermitage
    @kermitage 4 роки тому

    The "party of 1939" cost my country 6 million people (20% of total population). Please, reconsider your titles; this one shows nothing more but bad taste.