Nobel Prize Winners | Countries with Most Nobel Laureates
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- This is a comparison video of Nobel Prize Laureates by country.
The Nobel Prizes and Prize in Economic Sciences have been awarded 616 times to 962 Laureates.
This video is showing all nobel prize laureates by their respective ethnicity or place of birth.
I use Alien Art Charts to make those videos, use this link alienart.io/?r.... to make similar videos as mine.
Data: www.nobelprize... .
.
.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, Music, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Reference:
support.google....
www.multiplech......
bit.ly/3l8GUbc
Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976:
www.copyright.....
www.copyright.....
1)This video has no negative impact on the original works (It would actually be positive for them).
2)This video is also for teaching purposes.
3)It is not transformative in nature.
south korea 0…
Only 1 Nobel Peace Prize
But the peace prize has no value.
soon they will get many for making good zombie movies
Brasil - 1
Japan😤
and then they say- Asians are smart, they have high IQ
軍のランキングなんかよりこっちの方が良い
この投稿者の軍の動画500万再生か
自画自賛は恥ずかしいから辞めてくれ
本質はそっちじゃ無い
軍のランキングよりこっちでランクインする方が良いって話
まぁ書き方が悪いなら編集するけど
Curie Sklodowska was Polish not French. Her husband was french
And Nelly Sachs was a German-born Jew who wrote in German, she is still considered a Swedish Nobel laureate. Marie Curie made her achievements in France. Period
@@TheLastCrusader22 Exactly. Location does not determine nationality.
look up: naturalization
@@average-osrs-enjoyer Yeah, for sure woman that supported Polish independence movements and called herself Polish was French :V
@@average-osrs-enjoyer She even name discoverd element ,,polonium" hmmm, i wonder whyyy
I believe it was in 1920 when Fritz Haber won the Nobel prize for the Haber-Bosch process to create synthetic ammonia based fertilizer increasing crop production on a mass scale. Much controversy rose from Great Britain and France because he was also labeled the father of chemical warfare and he was the one behind the development of chlorine gas during WW1. Just a little tid bit.
Yup
@@ellidominusser1138stick that in a hole with an electric cap and some det cord, and you have yourself an explosion. ANFO loaders for underground mines. Instead of dynamite since the 60's.
The Peace Prize is a joke.
Also the one for Economics,it isn't even a real Nobel Prize.
St Lucia has 2 Noble Laureates ...no mention of any???
A small island nation of 172000 people
Muchos alemanes nacionalizados
Fue por la operacion paperclip solo que no conviene hablar sobre eso
Sab sa zyada noble prize USA ko mila hai
Nobel Peace prize is a joke right? How kissinger, obama and yaser arafat won,
I mean.. sereously?? 😂
Russia Got these with vodka
Very funny. Keep joking funny dude
@@n_rusta xd that was 1 yr ago
Corrupt profits for their own gain..
If the nobel prize would have started in 15 th century 🇬🇧 UK English would be on top for their great work in field of PHYSICS ,CHEMISTRY , ENGINEERING, MEDICINE
Germany would be 2 nd
A country that has the world's most pollution and young talent India is not this game 🙂
Indians are migrating to the US and Otherworld countries to do research and R&D. Indians are doing well in the money-making game and survival mode. Even the authority wants the same.
The US is the 2nd youngest country on the current list at a little over 240 years old, meanwhile some others are thousands of years old :)
You know americans are former europeans? Its not like they had to invent the fire again. Plus the prices just started at 1900. Its not like a German got a nobel price for the Print in ~1400.
The great-grandson of the famous businessman Philip Nobel told why the main prize of the world is much more often received by Americans. In 1896, Alfred left a condition in his will: the capital of the Nobel Fund must be invested in shares of strong companies that give a good profit. In the 1920s and 1930s, the fund's money was invested primarily in American corporations. Since then, the Nobel Committee and the US have had very close ties.
The choice of the Nobel Committee has repeatedly caused scandals, disputes and intrigues. - 80 percent of all laureates are Americans, - says Philip Nobel. Most often, US citizens received an economic bonus. In this century, only two or three times they did not fall into the number of laureates. I know many American award winners. These are really smart people, but are there really no geniuses in other countries? Of course it isn't. But they are simply ignored.
Most of all, the Nobel family was outraged when the Peace Prize was awarded to the American president in 2009. A glaring incident occurred in 1973. US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger received the Nobel Prize for his contribution to peace in Vietnam. After that, the war there continued for another two years. However, Philip and his family cannot influence the decision of the Nobel Committee. They do not have a say in the selection of laureates.
It is no secret that the award is often given for political reasons. The Swedish Academy rejected Leo Tolstoy and Anton Chekhov, Marina Tsvetaeva and Anna Akhmatova. Only those writers who quarreled with the Soviet authorities received the prize: Joseph Brodsky, Ivan Bunin, Boris Pasternak, Alexander Solzhenitsyn. But every sixth prize in literature is awarded to Scandinavian writers: Swedes, Norwegians, Danes.
The Americans hastened to turn the Nobel Prize in Literature into an effective weapon in the Cold War.
Boris Pasternak was awarded the prize in 1958. For the novel "Doctor Zhivago", which tells about the restless soul of a Russian intellectual during the revolutionary events of the early 20th century. This work is not considered an outstanding novel - an inexpressive plot, blurred personalities of characters who often do not know what they want, plus a heavy, viscous language.
The then President of the United States personally petitioned the Nobel Committee for Pasternak. And the fate of the literary award was decided...
The Americans acted even more cynically in 1970, when they won the prize for Alexander Solzhenitsyn's work The Gulag Archipelago. Here it is worth recalling that, in general, Nobel intended to give out money for literary works of an idealistic plan. That is, for such literature, which, although it may embellish reality, but serves as an ideal for humanity.
Do we see such people in Pasternak's novel? And what about Solzhenitsyn, who gives the reader a whole portrait gallery of scoundrels who organized a system of forced labor? Moreover, in the "Archipelago" there is still a great many historical inaccuracies. But the Americans were not interested in these nuances. For them, the main thing was that the writer made a powerful attack against the Soviet regime.
But there is evidence that the American intelligence services were behind this whole story with the Archipelago. One of Solzhenitsyn's publishers in the West was a certain British subject, Mr. Flegon. In the mid-70s, for some reason, the publisher and the writer quarreled with each other, after which Flegon admitted to a number of Western publications that the CIA directly financed not only the Archipelago, but also a number of the writer's works, choosing from them mainly those where there was the sharpest criticism of the communist system.
About the same anti-Soviet considerations in 1987, the Nobel Prize was awarded to the dissident poet Joseph Brodsky ...
With the beginning of perestroika, the Americans, not particularly embarrassed, began to directly contact some Soviet writers with "Nobel proposals." They acted through a member of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CPSU, who was responsible for ideological work in the party, Alexander Yakovlev, whom many historians, not without reason, consider to be the highest-ranking agent of American influence in the Soviet political leadership.
It was Yakovlev who organized the visit of some Soviet writers to Rome in 1990, where they met with dissidents who once fled our country. It was there that the Soviet writers were promised bonuses. But subject to harsh criticism of the Soviet system.
In 1938, the United States recognized Adolf Hitler as Man of the Year "For Spreading Democracy Around the World." In 1939, Hitler was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. The Nobel Committee included the dictator in the preliminary lists. On February 1, 1939, his name was deleted from there. However, Janusz Wisniewski confidently states that the members of the committee did this solely on the initiative of Joseph Goebbels. As Vishnevsky writes, Goebbels knew that the war would soon begin, and the Nobel Prizes simply would not be awarded. But the information that Hitler was nominated for the Peace Prize is forever preserved on the tablets of history.
You did a good research work.
Thankyou for sharing 🙏
Tall tales you tell. All of it seems bogus. The USA does not recognize any "Man of the Year," now or ever. The reason the USA wins so many Nobel is simply because it is the richest country is the world and therefore it can invest so much in research and development.
The US did not recognize Hitler. TIME Magazine did. There is a big difference between a company and a country. Please try harder Boris.
I realize a lot of Russians are angry for being overlooked and that may be due to the political disaster of Communism that they choose which squandered 2 1/2 to 3 generations of their talent in state glorification that essentially sidelined them and misdirected their greatest minds. Perhaps it would be helpful for you to list the years in which you think a Russian should have been awarded a prize rather than someone else, and not just in literature but in all the sciences too. As for the literature prize, I'm no fan of Pasternak, but he is regularly taught in Russian schools, so he seems celebrated in your society despite your personal dislike. He is hardly a minor writer to be passed over, nor is Solzhenitsyn. In hindsight of course Tolstoy or Chekov deserved it more than the other Russians and are greater. The problem with any 'prize' in the arts is that the true impact of an artist is not known often until many years after their passing. This can be true for science as well, but the results in scientific fields are often more readily apparent than in the arts. In the arts, it can take decades to play out, so no one knows if a person who appears MAJOR now will stand the test of time. Bulgakov is an excellent example of someone who probably should have received it in his lifetime had we known. Of course It would be better if people were awarded these prizes late in life or posthumously to allow a bit of history and time to unfold. But all that said, it would seem your complaint is that of a individual who invests too much mental energy into a prize. The Nobel often rewards 'disruptors" not status quo seekers. So it makes sense that some of the Russians who did win were fighting against a system that many felt was evil and that ultimately collapsed. Why would the west reward a corrupt system? You weren't doing us any favors. As for Hitler you are very sadly mistaken. He was nominated by TIME magazine, a private company. Private companies are something we had in the West in the 1930s when you did not. A situation still largely true today.
proud to be indian (quote)
USA have more so due many Europeans went there ALL Europeans invented physics advanced mathematics chemistry biology
Most of them were German, British and Irish
Germany, UK, France, USA...
Nobel prize is non-political award ever, no...
Makes sense. They made most of our world today.
@@pepehimovic3135 What about Russia? It stood two World Wars against Germany, the leader of Noble Prizers
And still stands nowadays against another Noble Prizers leader, USA.
@@grixmyron7637 stop what? they occupied eastern europe... even eastern europe didn't like communism... the world war was won by the allies not only Russia... you think the war was only in europe what about ASIA, Africa, the Pacific, the Atlantic?
Ruzzia is innocent, right 😂😂😂
Interesting to see the top countries with most money gained mainly from slavery and wars. I wonder whether it plays part in this.
Ok commie
Obviously not, I don’t even know which countries you are referring to because the top ones on this list did not get their money from slavery and wars.
Yeah the Slaves did tell Albert Einstein how he wins the nobel price, right? Also because you say "top countries with most money" you should know that USA makes a lot of money from war but germany doesnt and didnt. When Germany makes war, they have less money after it. When USA makes a war, they have more money ( or oil... ) after it. And the German Colonies, were small, short time period and not profitable. unfortunatly.
@@maxdavis7722 He's probably talking about the middle eastern countries and the countries in Africa, with their millennia of slave trading and wars. Oh wait, none of those countries are on this list.
Absolutely bullshit. Your comment is naive and incorrect. Cope with your envy elsewhere
It's crazy that a tiny country like Denmark is on that list. Our population is smaller than that of New York City, LOL ;-)
Japan carrying the whole asian on it's back
Germany doing amazing for the past 120 years for a relatively small country compared to the US.
😂😂😂
If Germany has the same area, same natural resources and same population, it’s hard to say which country has more noble prize winners
So? Britain is even smaller and not far behind Germany in 3rd. EDIT - Britain has now overtaken Germany and is now 2nd behind the USA.
@@pacsi325why are you laughing?
Britain has more and created the modern world.If we go back to 1700 with the prize, the Brits would be miles ahead.Germany wouldn't even be industrialised without British industrialists giving them consultations in the early to mid 1800's- But Germany does have a great legacy also
*Britain also has a smaller population and fewer natural resources
일본 대단해! 다음은 중국이 엄청 뻗어나갈 것 같아!
It’s a pity Stephen Hawking did not win a Nobel .
Nobel price is a joke... Even obama dit it
But Barrack Obama did (but for what?)
@@SV-kr9fu1 million deaths
The lithium-ion battery is a great invention that will change the world.
Rising sons🇯🇵
1:06 "Jesse, we need to nobel prize"
১৯০১ সালে নোবেল পুরস্কার প্রচলনের পর থেকে ২০১৯ পর্যন্ত ৪ জন বাঙালি ব্যক্তিত্ত্ব এই পুরস্কার জয় করেছেন। সর্বপ্রথম বাঙালি হিসাবে নোবেল পুরস্কার লাভ করেন রবীন্দ্রনাথ ঠাকুর, ১৯১৩ সালে, সাহিত্যে। পরবর্তীতে ১৯৯৮ সালে অমর্ত্য সেন অর্থনীতিতে এবং ২০০৬ সালে ড. মুহাম্মদ ইউনূস শান্তিতে এই পুরস্কার জয় করেন।(বাংলাদেশ)🇧🇩
Three things I noticed in 2020 (the end):
1. France needs to try harder
2. The UK is the top 'big' nation, based on population vs prizes ratio.
3. Sweden, home of the Nobel Prize Committee. has far too many awards and is HIGHLY SUS.
i get your point about sweden, but sweden has made alot of discoveries. but ye, hawking should had one.
Im from sweden and yea we discovered alot of medicines and much about radioactivity and magnets
@@Dennan Sweden has invented and discovered amazing things.
They are a small nation, but highly efficient. They aren't doing much nowadays tho
@@SilencedButNotForgotten i mean we are still reasearching. so dunno what you mean by that comment.
Per capita we swiss win.
Germany could've easily stay on top position if it wasn't for WW2.
Yes, Many US and UK scientists after WW2 came from Germany
No, these figures are bogus anyway as you can see by the end totals eg. Britans got far more nobels in 2022. Germany had double the population of the UK and France in the early 20th century… That's the reason for its initial spurt. The Brits also gave all the rivals all the secrets of industrialisation with consultations in London in the mid 1800's, for payment. Just look now, even if we don't go back to when the Brits dominated in the 19th century, they are still far ahead and only have 2/3 of the population and natural resources of Germany
@@finitatem 🤣your comment is based on nothing. you just confirmed Germany had much larger population. 85 million right now and they are still far behind
All metrics show the brits dominate. They invented legally protected rights in 1689 and industrialisation in mid 18thC , Germany didnt even exist. Then they copied. This is fact in both UK and Germany primary sources.
@@Rowlph8888 with their colonies they had more natural resources than everyone combined and also the advantage of constantly being ravaged by war by being an island
@swagkachu3784 They had colonies in the first place because they were the most innovative and ambitious culture, with the most individualism following constant uprisings and pressures from the different tribal groups down the centuries not coexisting without dissent constantly.This led to them being the first country to have a political and legal revolution, resulting in the first legislation (1689) and structures (1707) protected by law, making royalty fade into the background and more groups became enfranchised, and the gradual establishment of the eventual representative democracy started.USA was full of English colonists who adapted these structures and then Lafayette adapted the US structures, in turn, into the French system.Ultimately, we have emancipation, enfranchisement and free time, as common citizens, in the modern world due to England's ancestors being the catalyst when there was no other evidence of it happening globally - without that, we would still be working as peasants in feudalism to create value for Lord's
Seriously, properly trace history back to 1600, Britain took over from the middle of that century and literally created 80 % of what we see as valuable and meaningful around us. This is also why they developed the Industrial Revolution, from 1760 onwards, because there were more groups of ambitious politically protected citizens to invent the tech created the modern world, 75 years before any other country started doing it, mainly because other countries were full of peasants, without belief in their rights to personal ambitions and private property, and which came to them as a result of English philosophy and word-of-mouth spread
For Gabriel Garcia Marquez you spelled Colombia as “Columbia” it should be corrected fyi.
In Japan, there was Shibasaburo Kitasato, a phantom Nobel laureate. He could have won an award in the 19th century.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitasato_Shibasabur%C5%8D
Okay! All right! But Wikipedia 🤮 should not be the referenced base 😁
@@pacsi325Wikipedia editors has done more significant for future generations than you could ever achieve in your life
Oh thanks....😂No thanks!
Because it is controlled, because it is not independent, so it is harmful!
But scientific, authoritative journals are very good. There are such and it is also available here on the Internet! An exception is genderstadis.😊
@@pacsi325 They have endeavoring policies to counter it. They received all criticisms since the time of its inception. Their response for being a volunteer editor community and to achieve transparency are to cite reliable sources, addressed by daily or periodically checking biases and inaccuracies, NPOV (Neutral Point of View) a policy that endeavors to present facts with a balanced and unbiased perspective. Content oversight and review processes by the ability for readers to "flag" and cite by "talk" it is to rectify an appropriate action for any identified issues and a Collaboration with external organizations thus they also evolves and make progress. Why are you better than them? They honestly deserve a Nobel peace prize since they foster future minds to not think uncritically like you and just make fun of people, if he's (uncited) beliefs don't correspond with the reality.
@@pacsi325 also it's "Gender studies" kid. Gender studies address ongoing debates and prejudices about medical issues like transgender transitioning and LGBT rights which is still not universally accepted for some countries. The fact you would exclude Gender studies from being a distinct scientific field, prove the fact that you think more in your feelings than your brain.
Where is Hungary in this list? We have 14 Nobel prize owners altogether!
So the list: Lénárd Fülöp, Bárány Róbert, Zsigmondy Richard, Szent-Györgyi Albert, Hevesy György, Békésy György, Wigner Jenő Pál, Gábor Dénes, Milton Friedman, Carleton Daniel Gajdusek, Polányi János Károly, Elie Wiesel, Oláh György, Harsányi János, Kertész Imre
No, you don't have, it's just a Hungarian propaganda, which includes also non-Hungarians born in the territory of pre-war greater Hungary. For example, 2 of those 13 people were Slovakians and one of them, particularly the inventor of parashoot Štefan Banič, also fought against the Hungarian oppression in monarchy and didn't consider himself Hungarian at all. The other one, Filip Lenard, didn't even speak Hungarian, he was half Slovakian and the other half ethnic German. Hungary has officially only 8 nobel prize winners, who were born in the rightful territory of Hungary and claimed to be Hungarian themselves.
@@majstter7420 it seems to me rather than it is Slovakian propaganda.
the 14 (I am coccerting myself!) Hungarian Nobel prize list does not contain for example Štefan Banič.
So the list: Lénárd Fülöp, Bárány Róbert, Zsigmondy Richard, Szent-Györgyi Albert, Hevesy György, Békésy György, Wigner Jenő Pál, Gábor Dénes, Milton Friedman, Carleton Daniel Gajdusek, Polányi János Károly, Elie Wiesel, Oláh György, Harsányi János, Kertész Imre
Today Slovakians wants to deny that their ancestors were part of Hungarian kingdom for centuries, later Habsburg Austria-Hungary and they got vast areas with remarkable Hungarian population as minority from Hungary at Trianon. So you are denying the history, very good. And Benes decrets that created CZ needs in 1945! (Hungarians here were from 896 as a HUngarian kingdom created in 986!) and basics the false reference still alive! That is the biggest sin!
Hey! There are 12 hungarian with nobel prize.
Where are they from your list?
They were not all Hungarian. Officially only 7 people from Hungary has nobel prize, the other 5 were from abroad, from the territories that were controlled by Hungary until 1920. But now they are not considered as Hungarian, maybe they are in Hungary but definitely not internationally.
@@majstter7420 Flawed reasoning!;)
@@Graun Real reasoning, how can you consider Hungarian someone, who couldn't even speak your language, just was born and lived in a territory you occupied? Just like Philipp Lenard, who was an ethnic German in Slovak language area and his knowledge of Hungarian ended on "jo napot"
pepe you are wrong! please look after, we have 14 Nobel prize altogether!
Lénárd Fülöp, Bárány Róbert, Zsigmondy Richard, Szent-Györgyi Albert, Hevesy György, Békésy György, Wigner Jenő Pál, Gábor Dénes, Milton Friedman, Carleton Daniel Gajdusek, Polányi János Károly, Elie Wiesel, Oláh György, Harsányi János, Kertész Imre
15
Marie Skłodowska-Curie*
We wuz kangz
China only 11...
They contribute to themselves not the world.
It'll probably increase a lot in the coming decades
@@firstwavenegativity6379 It depends on how much influence government will have.
Lol, China give to world very more
Most achievements for which Nobels are awarded are many decades old. Expect a lot more in the future, in the sciences at least. The vast majority of their prizes have come in the 2000s
Why no prizes were awarded in 1940? Was it because of WWII?
Yeah
@@Rismannen nah Hitler got the nobel prite
I didn't know Sweden was that good!
The cofounder of the prize himself is swedish, chemistry 🧪 alfred Nobel...
Матери Терезе и Герберту Маркузе давать премию не за что
Videos That Trigger Koreans to Get Angry For Some Reason.
Video full of lies. UK has 138 Nobel Peace Prize winners.Germany has 108 - a massive difference.UK has invented far more than Germany - it invented the modern world, the structures from the USA are from English tradition, including all the most successful universities whose inception was over 100 years before USA was even established
*
Uk cope is real
@@swagkachu3784 UK truth.Germany doesn't comparing any shape or form. They wouldn't even be industrialised and German citizens would rights protected in law, if the Brits ancestors didn't invent these and have them adapted by nations around them - this is a fact, so it's you who's coping
You make these videos using which software
bar race of excel
Great video. I know science and technology essential knowledge economy over here in the UK. In addition, lots of collaboration with other countries like Germany and the United States who are also some of the largest exporters of services. In fact the most influential countries globally in soft power as of 2022!
白人のための賞。意味がない
0 to infinity ( Planets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0)
Infinite Momvement from infinity 1sec. from black board theoretical infinite Relativity Live by infinite Master Pawan Tiwari
Capability = Century/ 1sec.
Eligibility = Decade/ 1sec.
Infinite Planner Pawan Tiwari
Infinite Founder Pawan Tiwari
Infinite Reformer Pawan Tiwari
Infinite Master Pawan Tiwari
In infinity
Space Scientists
Atomic Scientists
Spritual Monk/ imaam/ Pop
Judicial team with top ranked certification 13000Km Diameter Earth where top seniority grade closed forever and starting journey is called infinite Master Pawan Tiwari
In infinity
Don’t have vetnam??
ドイツすごい！
aziz sancar
where is your cahit arf
R.I.P Dr. Kary Mullis
Must have been done by a Bruit. They do not include Ireland but put them all under UK.
Marie curie my Queen
Sweden inventera Nobel Pride
Hungary has 13 winners, yet we're not on the list for some reason...
Sun of the modern world arose in the West
really, "columbian"? do better
Looking at Sweden, punching way above it weight with such a small population, but the UK with only 20% of America's population and considerably less than Germany, has done pretty well also.
cope
the numbers in the video appear to be wrong. Anyway, here is a list of countries with laureates per capita: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Nobel_laureates_per_capita.
As you can see, we Swiss are the highest-ranking serious country (Saint Lucia? Luxembourg? Pfft.) followed by Sweden, Austria, Norway, Ireland, Denmark and then the British.
The numbers are not wrong, check the description, the video is showing nobel prizes by their ethnicity or place of birth
For example if a scientist was born and grown up in Germany and during or after the war immigrated to USA I didnt consider him american bur german.
Best per capita (aside from very small coutries): Sweden, Switzerland, Austria
America domined the whole world
Proud of my country and Europe. ❤️
p may....😮...game...movie related...regards
This list is unfortunately pretty wrong.
Germany and uk so much different to france
Peace Nobel Prize 2022 : Zelensky ? 🤣
Why?
@@ignatius9893 Because most of nobel prize are "propaganda" :)
@@philippe-lebel Yeah, that's right.
Ukrainian people 🗳️
@@philippe-lebel What are you on about? Even the Peace Prizes, which ARE most controversial yes, are hardly propaganda. But biased in favour of certain...things? Sure. Science is science, it doesn't lie
UK have total 137 nobel 🏆
Germany have 115
1930 there was no India .. India got independence in 1947
How come it appears on 1930 ?
India is one of the oldest country in world
Source- Google
@@ion171no it is not
E o Brasil? Fazueli
可惜的是得到诺贝尔奖的11名中国人科学家中只有2位是中国国籍，其余的都是美国籍。不过这也没办法，毕竟美国的科研环境比中国好是客观事实。希望中国大陆的诺贝尔奖获得者能越来越多
中国四大発明
製紙、火薬、印刷、羅針盤
他にもたくさんの発明があり、中国はすでに偉大な国です。
あなたのコメントは謙虚で凄くかっこいい
中国はそのうち日本と競うくらいになると思いけどね
日本人暂时还是东亚之光@@j-type2112
Your country is underrated
@@j-type2112Hey Namaste from India and greetings to China i want to show some Great Indian Invention
Fibre optics the fastest way of internet transmission
Radio waves or wireless technology
Cataract surgery
Hotmail
5g connectivity happened by the Contribution of Sir Jagdish Chandra Bose
sugar
Rockets
Number system
Trigonometry function Modern day used to measure height of higher altitudes of object
File Transfer protocol was developed by Indian
There is alot more still❤
No african or islamic countries, its easy to know why
Well probably because most people in Africa were illiterate.The Islamic Countried are a bit similar with some also beeing very illiterate.Also the Proboem is:Most of the Countries that are in the Toplist in 2021 were also in the Toplist of 1910.The Reason for that is that their headstart made a big impact.
african or islamic ? first there are a lot of muslims in china also ( of course most people there are not muslims i know ). But whats your point ? seems like in those countries other interests are more represented. Some countries dont make effort in some things. For example, China, India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, indonesia, all those countries with most people, are so weak in soccer. they just dont make enough effort.
Yeah... because scientific pursuit isn't as important to them...plus technological inferiority.
But go ahead and pretend it's racism so you can feel better.
Naghib Mahfouz of Egypt won
Morocco has Nobel prize
USA HATERS QUIET ON THESE POSTS
They're jealous, though they'd never admit it
Yeah, I really hate that I didn't get a nobel piece prize for drone striking civilians in 3rd world countries. Maybe next time ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Bueno, Argentina apareció por un segundo. No solo hacemos fútbol.
Countries with high number or people have Nobel prize doesn't mean that country have genious people. It is all about developed countries have opportunity and other doesn't.
No nobel prize winners who shining better than all of them
Mahatma Gandhi
Leo Tolstoy
Nikos Kazantsakis
India 💪
Bullshit....
Not bullshit at all. Cope with your jealousy somewhere else.
Money talks, eh USA?
Called brain drain, smart people from poor people move to USA get a higher education and win the Nobel price or do other brilliant thing, a huge problem in eastern Europe is the brain drain to, Germany, Sweden, Norway and other western countries, sometimes they even get an education at home and move as soon as they can apply for a jobb in a rich country and no progress is made at home.
Yes. More money in research and development will give you a lot of Nobel winners. Just like in sports, the more you practice the more you excel in your field.
Pretty much
I love watching people cope with American envy.
Considering how America acts today, the nobel Prize has become pure nonsense.
Where is asia? Half population and this is the result? 😂
Japan is ranked 6th. Well, Japan is the only country in Asia that is doing well...
Not one muslim country in the list !
Because the earth is flat 🤣😂
Because all the smart one. Like the one who tells the law of refraction died. A long time ago
why are you surprised?
Are you genuinely surprised or are you oblivious to the facts of life? Have you heard anything ground breaking coming out of such country lately, or in the past 100 years.
@@rayh.9130 Huh? Like what?
Japan is buying the Nobel prizes😅😅😅😅
Well, you have too much inferiority against Japan. 😂 At least, Japan is much better than your country, in terms of the future. Get a life bro. 😂😂
The idea of bribing is very Chinese.
I'm not a nationalist by any mean, but 13 Hungarians won Nobel prize since 1905. If they screwed up that country, wonder how accurate is this list exactly. Or it is not by nationality, but instead by the country where the actual person lived, when got the prize? Can you make an accurate list?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Hungarian_Nobel_laureates