Pelican - Most Detailed Breakdown

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 лип 2024
  • In this episode: We give the D77-TC Pelican the Most Detailed Treatment!
    SUPPORT THE CHANNEL!
    -PATREON: / installation00
    -PAYPAL: www.paypal.me/MartinSmith052
    -MEMBERSHIP: / @installation00
    GET CONNECTED!
    -DISCORD: / discord
    -TWITCH: / installation00twitch
    -SUBREDDIT: / installation00
    SOCIAL MEDIA!
    -FACEBOOK: bit.ly/2PB4riV
    -TWITTER: / installation001
    -INSTAGRAM: / installation.00
    -Installation00 Amino - bit.ly/2oFfDzx
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,3 тис.

  • @chippsdubbo990
    @chippsdubbo990 4 роки тому +845

    "You don't have the fire power sir"
    "No... But I've got the mass"

    • @tranminh-hm2nk
      @tranminh-hm2nk 4 роки тому +85

      Roger that. Hit ‘em hard boss

    • @matthewleto1180
      @matthewleto1180 4 роки тому +26

      The subtitles say “I’ve got the math”, but I know what you mean.

    • @chippsdubbo990
      @chippsdubbo990 4 роки тому +32

      @@matthewleto1180 that's strange I mean mass makes more sense

    • @sidewinder1176
      @sidewinder1176 4 роки тому +53

      @@tranminh-hm2nk You're on your own NOBLE. Carter out

    • @matthewleto1180
      @matthewleto1180 4 роки тому +4

      I made this channel to comment cal, oh crap. You’re right. I must’ve read and heard it wrong. Whoops

  • @DezzarTac
    @DezzarTac 4 роки тому +738

    I admit I have a problem: I am utterly obsessed with the Pelican. I love all the human vehicles from the original game, but the Pelican takes the cake, eats it, and bakes another f******* cake.

    • @GretchentheAlligator
      @GretchentheAlligator 4 роки тому +43

      I hope Halo Infinite lets us actually fly one of the classic pelicans a lot.

    • @majorchimera2494
      @majorchimera2494 4 роки тому +30

      @@GretchentheAlligator better yet allow it to be used in multiplayer and forge mod.

    • @sophisticatedraccoon
      @sophisticatedraccoon 4 роки тому +15

      @@GretchentheAlligator yeah instead of. Single mission where you just fly km and that's it.

    • @MaximusOfTheMeadow
      @MaximusOfTheMeadow 4 роки тому +10

      @@sophisticatedraccoon if it's in campaign/multiplayer maybe a pilot and a gunner seat? Like in 4 but better

    • @koeryn
      @koeryn 4 роки тому +9

      @@GretchentheAlligator I kind of now want a Foe Hammer HALO CE, where you're taxiing troops into/out of combat zones and occasionally rescuing Master Chief on HALO as the baddest pelican in the series.

  • @yab01keef67
    @yab01keef67 4 роки тому +476

    "It can land virtually anywhere."
    Pelican pilot: Land?

    • @andrewowens4421
      @andrewowens4421 4 роки тому +84

      Yeah, as much as I love the Pelicans, they were notorious for being shot down.

    • @AdmiralBison
      @AdmiralBison 4 роки тому +85

      @@andrewowens4421 well, they would be priority targets especially if they were carrying "demons".

    • @simpleisbetter4132
      @simpleisbetter4132 4 роки тому +28

      @@andrewowens4421 They should save time and stop building landing gears for them.

    • @omartorres5688
      @omartorres5688 4 роки тому +22

      @@andrewowens4421 that is because most don't have guns or missiles and the pilots don't make the first shot as a 70mm chain gun would have ripped open that scarab turret

    • @narenthebeesechurgerman422
      @narenthebeesechurgerman422 3 роки тому +4

      @@omartorres5688 probably not but that pelican was also unarmed

  • @hummerskickass
    @hummerskickass 4 роки тому +705

    I once asked my dad; a lifelong pilot, what he thought of the pelican. He didn’t have to look at the picture for more than five seconds to tell me it would fly like a brick.
    After I got done laughing at his unintentional Sergeant Johnson reference I had to completely agree with him. It may fly like a brick but it’s a brick that can haul a main battle tank, and infantry support from one side of the solar system to the other.
    I miss you dad, you magnificent aviator.

    • @LMG1792
      @LMG1792 3 роки тому +66

      hummerskickass as Foe Hammer says in CE “ this pelican won’t turn on a dime”

    • @FlameDarkfire
      @FlameDarkfire 3 роки тому +39

      Looking at how many avionics, controls, and assisting modules it has (read: needs) I can believe it.

    • @BeKindToBirds
      @BeKindToBirds 3 роки тому +58

      It flies like a brick because it's meant to be stable transitioning from hypersonic to supersonic during fast re entry.
      The space shuttle was also a flying brick and it didn't do combat drops

    • @Longslide7
      @Longslide7 3 роки тому +40

      The F-4 Phantom II. Proof that with a big enough engine even a brick will fly

    • @FlameDarkfire
      @FlameDarkfire 3 роки тому +8

      @@BeKindToBirds not with that attitude

  • @battlelord852
    @battlelord852 4 роки тому +992

    Installation 00: Most Detailed Pelican video
    U.S. Military: (Takes notes)

    • @isaachinds3736
      @isaachinds3736 4 роки тому +98

      U.S ONI: Already built it.

    • @LoneWolf20213
      @LoneWolf20213 4 роки тому +72

      I really hope the military make a pelican in real life

    • @GretchentheAlligator
      @GretchentheAlligator 4 роки тому +36

      It would be incredible to see a real one built.

    • @n8dogue
      @n8dogue 4 роки тому +59

      @@LoneWolf20213 I would imagine that it wouldn't be too difficult as we already have comparable vehicles irl e.g. the V-22 Osprey

    • @LoneWolf20213
      @LoneWolf20213 4 роки тому +27

      Nathan Morgan that is nowhere near as amazing or effective though

  • @thomasa5619
    @thomasa5619 4 роки тому +558

    “The pelican doesn’t look that big”
    Well no, not from a 7’ tall half ton point of view.

    • @thomasa5619
      @thomasa5619 4 роки тому +41

      Also, one pelican can hold half a Spartan II cohort, and a modified one with standard engines can EASILY hold twice the whole spartan II cohort?

    • @darrvenomfier790
      @darrvenomfier790 3 роки тому +50

      Ya their kinda ridiculously useful... the simple fact that they can hold that much and go between Exo and atmospheric flight says something about how fucking powerful those engines are...

    • @WingManFang1
      @WingManFang1 3 роки тому +3

      😹

    • @WingManFang1
      @WingManFang1 3 роки тому +5

      @@darrvenomfier790 just imagine the amount of Fuel they use

    • @LockheedC-130HerculesOfficial
      @LockheedC-130HerculesOfficial 3 роки тому +3

      i mean even in the games from a marine POV they aren't they big

  • @The_Viscount
    @The_Viscount 4 роки тому +584

    I know this ship was inspired by the Colonial Marines dropship, but the pelican blows it away.

    • @strategosopsikion8576
      @strategosopsikion8576 4 роки тому +50

      I know right! It’s such a cool ship! I wish they a had a model kit for the OG pelican. As I’m not as big of a fan of the new 343 pelican.

    • @padfoot1178
      @padfoot1178 4 роки тому +1

      SoldierlyOyster the new pelicans is one of the newer models

    • @Stallnig
      @Stallnig 4 роки тому +21

      I believe that CM and the likes were exactly the source for the whole beloved gritty artstyle, which 343 never grasped and trew out the window.

    • @The_Punisher
      @The_Punisher 4 роки тому +2

      It's a beauty

    • @The_Viscount
      @The_Viscount 3 роки тому +2

      @@Stallnig right?

  • @piercepayumo4212
    @piercepayumo4212 4 роки тому +1340

    Foe Hammer: You know our motto, "We deliver".

  • @NoNameTaken117
    @NoNameTaken117 4 роки тому +829

    See, theirs one military equipment that has been here for more than 200 years...
    Knives.

  • @teryn3723
    @teryn3723 4 роки тому +407

    Technically a pelican will save your ass by giving you something to use like ammo, tanks, and personnel, and close air support
    "REMEMBER ECHO"

    • @keyloh9386
      @keyloh9386 4 роки тому +17

      *salutes*
      Remember Echo!
      Btw, my best ship in elite dangerous is named after her pelican and carries her call sign as it's designation in remembrance.

    • @benjaminrobledo5466
      @benjaminrobledo5466 4 роки тому +3

      Who's Echo?

    • @manicmangomango8118
      @manicmangomango8118 4 роки тому +11

      @@benjaminrobledo5466 foehammer from ce

    • @benjaminrobledo5466
      @benjaminrobledo5466 4 роки тому +5

      @@manicmangomango8118
      Oh. Yes. Her. Lol.
      Sorry. Its just that I just finished Reach and just started CE. I'm in that snowy mission. Assault on the Control Room, I believe. Haven't played any of the Halo games except these 2. Just got MCC for PC. :)

    • @strangeonexd4776
      @strangeonexd4776 4 роки тому +9

      Remember her motto;
      We deliver!

  • @StacheMan26
    @StacheMan26 4 роки тому +173

    Y'know, the Warthog being hydrogen powered makes more sense once you take into account the Pelican (and presumably all the other dropships and other aerospace craft in UNSC service) being fueled by hydrogen. It's the space going future equivalent of the current US military requirement that every vehicle in inventory be capable of running on JP8 (their preferred blend of jet fuel), even if its not ideal for the performance or efficiency of the particular platform, because its one less logistical hurdle to overcome when the system gets stressed.
    And that's just with one nation on one planet (that's generally regarded as being pretty damn good at logistics), take space travel and accompanying limits in cargo volume into account and its a lot easier for the system to get stressed to a point where delivery of multiple different fuel types to the combat zone in sufficient quantity to fulfill needs becomes difficult or impossible, so they cut it down. No more fussing about with "30th Division needs X amount of petrol, Y diesel. No I said Z diesel, you ingrate!", instead UNSC logistics just goes "You get hydrogen! And you get hydrogen! So do you! Everyone gets hydrogen!"

    • @thelvadam2884
      @thelvadam2884 4 роки тому +19

      HYDROGEN FOR EVERYONE!!!

    • @johnwotek3816
      @johnwotek3816 4 роки тому +46

      It also help hydrogen is the most abundand form of matter in the universe.

    • @phoenixjones7191
      @phoenixjones7191 4 роки тому +29

      Not to mention you could probably replenish fuel easily seeing as hydrogen is so common. Even if you needed a specific isotope you could make them on the ship and just pull hydrogen from space.

    • @UNSCPILOT
      @UNSCPILOT 4 роки тому +21

      That is actually a brilliant point, I wondered why the Hog was Hydrogen rather than electric, matching the fuel with other equipment makes sense, saves on extra training and simplifies logistics

  • @teryn3723
    @teryn3723 4 роки тому +273

    Finally something about the workhorse of UNSC!

    • @matchesburn
      @matchesburn 4 роки тому +10

      Virgin: "The workhorse of the UNSC - the Warthog!"
      The Chad: [snickers in Pelican]

    • @sorrenblitz805
      @sorrenblitz805 Рік тому

      ​@@matchesburn the warthog has been in UNSC service for 300 years it's definitely the work horse. The pelican is the truck that delivers that horse.

  • @ROBOHOLIC1
    @ROBOHOLIC1 4 роки тому +209

    Our budget only allows for one crashed Pelican per mission.

    • @cfdeers
      @cfdeers 4 роки тому +50

      ehh fuck it. It's a rental

    • @autumngottlieb3071
      @autumngottlieb3071 3 роки тому +20

      "Right. Land. That just means 'stop flying,' right?"
      "Brace for impact!"
      "Oh shit! This is gonna suck!"

    • @DartLuke
      @DartLuke 3 роки тому +10

      Halo 4-Lets's crush 3 Pelicans in one mission

    • @deltadude7417
      @deltadude7417 3 роки тому +1

      @@DartLuke I mean the infinity has like 150 on regular and their hangers aren’t even that full

    • @elijahaitaok8624
      @elijahaitaok8624 3 роки тому +1

      North Korea can only afford the cannons for half a year

  • @HildegardActual
    @HildegardActual 4 роки тому +171

    Fell in love with the Pelican the moment I saw it.

    • @RSAleft9
      @RSAleft9 4 роки тому +4

      Same. I still love her to this day. Hands down the best Sci Fi aircraft out there minus the Valkyrie from 40k.

    • @jaerpanzer
      @jaerpanzer 4 роки тому +1

      I did not like your comment because 69 gigity

    • @HildegardActual
      @HildegardActual 4 роки тому

      @@jaerpanzer Nice.

    • @ace-jc8iu
      @ace-jc8iu 3 роки тому

      @@RSAleft9 couldn't agree more

  • @sergeantmarcusstackerM1903
    @sergeantmarcusstackerM1903 4 роки тому +242

    Virgin’s D79 vs. Chad’s D77

    • @PS-mw9cc
      @PS-mw9cc 4 роки тому +39

      Fun fact sir! : james cameron took inspiriation for the huge ass space shuttle in the Avatar movies from the D77 Pelican

    • @sergeantmarcusstackerM1903
      @sergeantmarcusstackerM1903 4 роки тому +28

      And the pelican was inspired by the dropship from Aliens

    • @Allstar-yl1ek
      @Allstar-yl1ek 4 роки тому +18

      @@sergeantmarcusstackerM1903 the circle(jerk) of life

    • @sniperbait6950
      @sniperbait6950 4 роки тому +14

      The D79 kinda reminds me of that horribly refurbished picture of Jesus, Ecce Homo. Poor gal you deserved better D77.

    • @kevinweber5919
      @kevinweber5919 4 роки тому +1

      No, no you said it backwards!

  • @siphonicstorm7191
    @siphonicstorm7191 4 роки тому +249

    The Pelican was always my favorite dropship in Halo. To be honest, I'd prefer to be transported by a Pelican. In my opinion, I prefer the D-77 Pelican dropship over the D-79 models.

    • @siva4wotblitzhero531
      @siva4wotblitzhero531 4 роки тому +48

      The D-79 is the Ugly,Starved looking ones from Halo 4 and onward right?

    • @sergeantmarcusstackerM1903
      @sergeantmarcusstackerM1903 4 роки тому +14

      SIVA mem.2769 SIVA mem. code 6359 you bet your ass

    • @danward4681
      @danward4681 4 роки тому +36

      The D-77 is sleeker, prettier and much more visually appealing than the D-79, it also provides a more functional shape for the cockpit glass, the almost globed shape of the D-79 cockpit which makes no sense and would actually make it weaker, again, makes no sense

    • @tristanbackup2536
      @tristanbackup2536 4 роки тому +11

      DC-79 is more aerodynamic for in-atmosphere flights to put less strain on the engines. It's just common technological innovation, can't rock the 77 forever.

    • @awesomenessnetwork213
      @awesomenessnetwork213 4 роки тому +9

      @DAS ist gut The D79 you're talking about is another variant. The normal D79 actually has less weapons than the D77 (D79 only has the chin mounted 70mm). The D77 has everything you said about it, along with two heavy missile pods ( one on each wing) and is heavily armored.

  • @jamesmartel8381
    @jamesmartel8381 4 роки тому +113

    Playing Combat Evolved as a kid, me and my friends, always said just wait till halo 2 we will get to fly a pelican !! I absolutely adore this vehicle such a great design

    • @thelvadam2884
      @thelvadam2884 4 роки тому +2

      Same, , its a piece of art

    • @Jose_Doe
      @Jose_Doe 4 роки тому +1

      And funny enough we actually can with a glitch

    • @havoccreations6746
      @havoccreations6746 4 роки тому +9

      One day. We will get to spawn the majestic aircraft that is the pelican in Forge and fly it around in Custom games.
      One day.

    • @potatowizard6252
      @potatowizard6252 4 роки тому +10

      You can fly it in Reach on the Alexander mission. But you have to press some buttons and fly through a donut.

    • @LOUDcarBOMB
      @LOUDcarBOMB 4 роки тому

      PC and mods my friends and people have done it already on the Insider Program for Halo 3 just a few days ago.

  • @ShaneA112
    @ShaneA112 4 роки тому +53

    Pilot: "York send that little green guy up here."
    York: "You heard her Delta, go on."

    • @PyroMaster87
      @PyroMaster87 4 роки тому +9

      "Did you just create a backup of yourself?"
      "I am confident in your abil.."
      "Dick move."
      "I am"
      "DICK....move."

    • @dylancasey1702
      @dylancasey1702 4 роки тому +1

      Man i love red vs blue

  • @thermalvision203
    @thermalvision203 4 роки тому +86

    3:34 The Mosin Nagant comes close as it was first produced in 1891. The USS Consitution and HMS Victory are still both technically active warships and they were launched in 1797 and 1765 respectively, though as neither has seen combat in over 200 years, I don't think they count.

    • @Xenonfastfall
      @Xenonfastfall 4 роки тому +3

      Which military actively uses Mosins in combat though

    • @Nyx_2142
      @Nyx_2142 4 роки тому +12

      @@Xenonfastfall The Mosin has been used in more conflicts than almost any other gun. Read up on it a bit. Pre-WW1 and still sees use in active conflicts in the Middle East and whichever neighbor Russia is invading this year.

    • @OrileyBomb
      @OrileyBomb 4 роки тому +7

      Xenonfastfall if you want to add the stipulation of it has to be deployed by a organized national military then the round the Mosin fires (7.62x54R) was developed in 1891 with the Mosin and is still used today in Russian PKM machine guns.

    • @LOUDcarBOMB
      @LOUDcarBOMB 4 роки тому +3

      I know my reply is a technically correct answer, but the U.S. military (Navy and Coast Guard) still uses the .45-70 Gov. cartridge that was designed from 1873 and is 147 years old. This round does not have a bullet since it uses it's gunpowder for line-propelling purposes.
      Off topic, but the little door on lever-action rifles where you insert cartridges that goes into the magazine tube (called King's Patent Loading Gate) was designed and patented in 1866 and used on the Winchester 1866. That rifle was so influential that it caused the Russians to design the Mosin Nagant by the massive losses from the Battle of Plevna (outgunned by a way smaller Ottoman force). The gate is still in use today and is 154 years old.

    • @jmfowler9062
      @jmfowler9062 4 роки тому +1

      @@LOUDcarBOMB I'm going to need to see the source you found that says 45-70 govt is a cartridge without a bullet so that I may laugh at it.

  • @herbderbler1585
    @herbderbler1585 4 роки тому +67

    2120 youtuber: I challenge you to find a single example of military equipment still in use today after being originally introduced in the 1950s.
    2120 commenter: B-52 Stratofortress, what's my prize?

    • @stuglife5514
      @stuglife5514 3 роки тому +6

      The M2 browning or the AK-47 and AKM would be good guesses. As long as there is war there will be two things for the foreseeable future. The maduce and the kalash

    • @immortalwarrior2695
      @immortalwarrior2695 3 роки тому +1

      @@stuglife5514 Bolt action rifles. Let's be honest, Bolt action sniper rifles are always preferred by Snipers

    • @commanderbracey7501
      @commanderbracey7501 3 роки тому

      Bayonet 🤔

  • @jamesneumann2003
    @jamesneumann2003 4 роки тому +52

    I don't know of any military equipment still in use from the 1860's but the Madsen MG was first introduced in the 1890's, its last know use was in 2016 by the Brazilian Military Police.

    • @christopherjohnson532
      @christopherjohnson532 4 роки тому +4

      Swords and knives

    • @liamblack1558
      @liamblack1558 4 роки тому +2

      The sextant was produced in numbers in the late 1700s, and remains in regular use by modern navies.

    • @jonathangardner8481
      @jonathangardner8481 4 роки тому

      Gatling gun. It was first fielded during the civil war, if I recall correctly.

  • @RSAleft9
    @RSAleft9 4 роки тому +18

    I do love how Bungie really thought out the Pelican and how she could operate.. with out realizing it completely mind you but you can get this brick to fly and that makes me so happy. The Pelican is one of my favorite drop ships of all time. Knowing she's similar to a 130 makes me just smile even more!

  • @ardoronro6677
    @ardoronro6677 4 роки тому +81

    I'd rather crash and die in a D-77 then live to fly a D-79. That's why they the pilots never make it and I'm with them all the way.

    • @thegoldengrunt3414
      @thegoldengrunt3414 4 роки тому

      But the d79 gunship... thats another thing. Also im pretty sure the d79 is russian

    • @screech-screecher536
      @screech-screecher536 4 роки тому +6

      He’s talking about the 343 designed pelican the D-79

  • @awesomenessnetwork213
    @awesomenessnetwork213 4 роки тому +23

    Installation00: *briefly talks about SSTOs*
    KSP players: hey, hey. I've seen this one!

  • @Abrxas01
    @Abrxas01 4 роки тому +15

    That picture you showed of the 'C-130' loading an M1 was in fact a C5 Galaxy. While I'm not sure about the internal dimensions of the C-130 cargo bay, I am certain it cannot carry an M1 Abrams. The Abrams weighs 68 tons while the max cargo weight of the C 130 is 24 tons.

    • @syndromeofadowns
      @syndromeofadowns 2 роки тому

      A d- 77pelican can carry a 66 ton scorpion tank with ease

    • @thearnorianruby4681
      @thearnorianruby4681 Місяць тому

      ​@@syndromeofadowns with its magnet, not in its cargo bay.

  • @Trollo_Swaggins
    @Trollo_Swaggins 4 роки тому +25

    I’ve been having a rough go of it lately (anxiety and depression are a bitch aren’t they).
    Seeing an alert for a new Installation 00 lore video, especially the Most Detailed Videos really does make me happy
    Thank you

  • @riktor3005
    @riktor3005 4 роки тому +14

    @Installation00 - List of Military equipment in use since the 1860s:
    Flagpole + Flag.
    Bayonet.
    That's it, I think...

  • @jamesmartel8381
    @jamesmartel8381 4 роки тому +30

    Also not a vehicle but a military hardware introduced in the 1860s and still in use today it the Gatling gun(introduced in civil war ) which they put a motor on and turned into the minigun

    • @SuperHornetPilot
      @SuperHornetPilot 4 роки тому +3

      And then they made a bigger version that fires 20mm ammo and put it onto just about every US fighter jet as the M61 Vulcan and finally an even bigger version in the form of the GAU-8 on the A-10 Warthog. Not bad for something that started out as a hand-cranked weapon mounted on what looks like a mount for artillery of that same era.

    • @alfredforbessealy524
      @alfredforbessealy524 2 роки тому

      yeah but it's not like we're using the exact same model of the same hardware made in the same way, as the pelican. You can discern lots of common points between the 1860s one and the present day one, but apart from their basic functions they're almost nothing alike

  • @Justice094
    @Justice094 4 роки тому +12

    The classic art style pelican is one sexy bird. Its long since been a reason of why i wanted to be a pilot.

  • @thatguyj5596
    @thatguyj5596 4 роки тому +130

    a piece of equipment used since the 1860s, if not earlier:
    Binoculars.
    Do I win a prize? (jk)

    • @LoT945
      @LoT945 4 роки тому +5

      the bayonet circa early 1600s

    • @SBRtime69420
      @SBRtime69420 4 роки тому +7

      @@LoT945 yeah, but a 1860s bayonet and a modern day bayonet are extremely different whereas a D77 and a D79 are fairly similar

    • @fubar9629
      @fubar9629 4 роки тому +2

      the longest serving piece of equipment that i can think of is prob the mosin nagant... pre ww2 i believe

    • @stahl1624
      @stahl1624 4 роки тому +1

      Fubar96 Only because you’re a Sovietboo who knows nothing outside of your small brain.
      You’re probably a Yank as well, says it all really lmfao

    • @mechredd
      @mechredd 4 роки тому +1

      The 45-70 cartridge was developed in 1873 and is still in active duty use with the United States Navy.

  • @_Raven_
    @_Raven_ 3 роки тому +6

    I know it's already been done, but I've always wanted to build my own Pelican in Space Engineers. This video has given me enough information to design one in real life, let alone in a game. You are a credit to the Halo fanbase. Thank you for your service.

  • @CoffeeCrowgasm
    @CoffeeCrowgasm 4 роки тому +152

    Another 50 years and the M1911 will just about be there lol.

    • @sergeantmarcusstackerM1903
      @sergeantmarcusstackerM1903 4 роки тому +16

      And still going strong. John Browning is a saint

    • @fluent4530
      @fluent4530 4 роки тому +16

      When it’s able to enter space on its own thrust then I’ll be impressed

    • @Mcree114
      @Mcree114 4 роки тому +12

      The M2 Browning HMG too

    • @zennyblades
      @zennyblades 4 роки тому +9

      Time to strap a rocket to a 1911

    • @thomasbrand2650
      @thomasbrand2650 4 роки тому +4

      The 1911 left service in 1986 when it was replaced by the Beretta M9.
      Even most special forces carry other sidearms such as SEALs and the P226.

  • @Leitis_Fella
    @Leitis_Fella 4 роки тому +19

    160+years of service for the pelican eh?
    The closest real-world example of military equipment over a century old still being in use is the 7.62x54r rifle cartridge, introduced in 1891 for the Russian Empire's Mosin-Nagant M91 bolt-action rifles, and used today in PKM machine guns and SVD and PSL marksman rifles.

    • @kennethbedwell5188
      @kennethbedwell5188 4 роки тому +3

      B-52. By the time it leaves service it will be over 100 years old.

    • @sergeantmarcusstackerM1903
      @sergeantmarcusstackerM1903 4 роки тому

      Even the AR-15 family is getting old

    • @Bird_Dog00
      @Bird_Dog00 3 роки тому

      To be fair, the past 200 years have seen some very fast technological advancement.
      In that time frame we got rid of the flintlock and have now developed the railgun...

    • @mizzinfamous9746
      @mizzinfamous9746 3 роки тому

      @@Bird_Dog00 crazy to think how fast we went from no internet and limited medicine and damn near no space travel( no self landing rockets) among other great technology is seemingly just one lifetime it’s like as soon as we found out what electricity was and can use it technology was literally just off to the races. Just like how our grandparent don’t understand current technology much it’s hard to believe that I’m prolly gonna be that grandparent who can’t understand my grandkids toys and technology

    • @Bird_Dog00
      @Bird_Dog00 3 роки тому

      @@mizzinfamous9746 I don't think electricity had much to do with it beyond making some things like communication easier.
      The real game changer were the printing press, the mechanisation of agriculture, freeing up much manpower and improving food supply thus allowing more people to devote their time to things other than food production and more universaly available education.
      Those factors combined were a force multiplier for collective learning.

  • @VictusPrime
    @VictusPrime 4 роки тому +48

    Always loved the Pelican, it's probably my favorite vehicle. It's just so recognizable. It's too bad 4 and 5 fudged the design.

    • @Vatniks_are_clowns
      @Vatniks_are_clowns 4 роки тому +1

      agreed

    • @immortalwarrior2695
      @immortalwarrior2695 4 роки тому +5

      I love halo 4 design. It has lots of goodies also so bonus points

    • @trinalgalaxy5943
      @trinalgalaxy5943 4 роки тому +1

      @@immortalwarrior2695 the halo 4 design just does not feel right. the cockpit traded out that "halo" look for something more hind like. the back feels even smaller and the few time you see it there are no lights providing a black hole to keep you from realizing that it is not detailed AT ALL! like so much of H4, there were good ideas with bad implementation, and then royally fucked by H5. that being said, the H5 take on the bird is at least slightly improved in a few points: larger and detailed bay.

    • @Xenonfastfall
      @Xenonfastfall 4 роки тому +1

      I like Halo wars 2's use of it in heavy lifting and the cooler one for personnel transport, makes it look to fit its role there

    • @paulnathanmullock6214
      @paulnathanmullock6214 4 роки тому +1

      Halo 4 and 5 fudged up a lot of designs.

  • @_Hodgepodge
    @_Hodgepodge 4 роки тому +62

    What is the plural of "Mongoose"?
    Most people: Mongooses
    Instalation 00: Mongeese
    Me: I say Mongoosen

  • @StreakedSilver
    @StreakedSilver 4 роки тому +7

    F in the chat for Foehammer. the best written character in the fewest amount of lines who you never see the face of.

    • @alfredforbessealy524
      @alfredforbessealy524 2 роки тому +1

      he is died
      F
      edit : just here to rectify mistake : she is died

  • @privatepessleneck
    @privatepessleneck 4 роки тому +8

    "Like rocks with wings, seriously! Never see one land the side up you want, or even land it on purpose."
    ~Dimkee Hotay

  • @nicholaswalsh4462
    @nicholaswalsh4462 4 роки тому +35

    The Scorpion Tank is undergunned and over-engineered.

    • @TheArtistKnownAsNooblet
      @TheArtistKnownAsNooblet 4 роки тому +3

      it's just a big ass rotating turret on a set of treads innit

    • @thomaspriewasser6660
      @thomaspriewasser6660 4 роки тому +2

      @@TheArtistKnownAsNooblet but it's quad tracks, so even worse

    • @nicholaswalsh4462
      @nicholaswalsh4462 4 роки тому +2

      @@TheArtistKnownAsNooblet with a gun that stopped being used by armies on earth in the 1950s.

    • @TheArtistKnownAsNooblet
      @TheArtistKnownAsNooblet 4 роки тому +8

      @@nicholaswalsh4462 correction: ammunition that stopped being used in the 50's. The gun itself looks pretty advanced being significantly smaller than modern turrets and having an impressive fire rate of 15 rounds per minute using an auto loader and having much greater variation in the z-axis (seriously that mother fucker can almost look straight up) also the turret turns pretty fast, I don't know how fast exactly but it's way faster than most real tanks

    • @madcourier6217
      @madcourier6217 3 роки тому +5

      @@TheArtistKnownAsNooblet Well to be fair the 90mm their using for the Scorpion tank is supposed to be a Ultra High Velocity cannon.

  • @CoffeeCrowgasm
    @CoffeeCrowgasm 4 роки тому +45

    Oh my God you said mongeese I finally feel less alone haha

    • @schwig44
      @schwig44 4 роки тому +2

      @Kit Andrei Maniquis it is known

    • @irondudeful
      @irondudeful 4 роки тому

      @Kit Andrei Maniquis I hate to completely ruin your life, but the plural for "mongoose" is actually "mongooses". Somebody told me that once and.. low and behold, Google was there to ruin me, and now you guys as well.

    • @kjoege1000
      @kjoege1000 4 роки тому +3

      @@irondudeful both are correct, as is listed on many online dictionaries. Don't just trust what people tell you, same for me, go check the merriam-webster dictionary, that's one i personally trust.

    • @irondudeful
      @irondudeful 4 роки тому

      @@kjoege1000 ohhhh I see, thank you for the correction!

  • @lostatsauce2625
    @lostatsauce2625 4 роки тому +2

    If 343 ever makes an in universe documentary you have to be part of the project

  • @genemonai9592
    @genemonai9592 4 роки тому +8

    A weapon that was developed in the 1860s that is still used today, hough heavily upgrades would be the gatling gun.

  • @LoneWolf20213
    @LoneWolf20213 4 роки тому +12

    If I were to change one thing, I’d be to have a Covenant power plant to power the ship, some of those engines for better speed and maneuverability, plasma weapons and shields, but keep the design the same

    • @phoenixjones7191
      @phoenixjones7191 4 роки тому +2

      There's one in the books. Sorta hybrid designed ship. The infinity has forerunner based slip space engines and shields and actual forerunner engineers fixing her up

    • @schwig44
      @schwig44 4 роки тому +1

      @@phoenixjones7191 true, not even the ones that the covies had, fresh Huragok, nothin like it

  • @UNSCrearadmiral
    @UNSCrearadmiral 4 роки тому +2

    So happy that we discussed the d77 and not the cheap knockoff that is the D79

  • @Sanya6496
    @Sanya6496 4 роки тому +7

    The best and most venerated Pelican model finally gets an in depth review.

  • @PolymurExcel
    @PolymurExcel 4 роки тому +19

    Damn, 160 years, the closest thatthe US millitary has ever gotten to that are the M2 Browning and the M1911, both are just over 100 years.

    • @Neion8
      @Neion8 3 роки тому

      I thought the browning came into service in 1933 (ergo 87 years rather than over 100)? The M1911 is a good example though. Only other thing I can think of (which is kinda sketch at that) is the Lee Enfield rifle (in service 1895-1957) which continued to see use in other countries armies until the 70's and recently mostly used either for training (up until 2016 was the training weapon for the Canadian rangers) or by relatively poorly equipped fighting forces (such as ISIL in 2019).
      Though, depending on how much leeway is given to a modification before it's declared an entirely different entity (comparative to the Pelican's model numbers), one could argue that a heavily modified version of the Gatling gun ( original in service 1862-1911) exists today in the M61Vulcan minigun and the GAU-8 Avenger given that the basic operating principle (though not the systems that power them) are very similar - in fact, miniguns are often referred to as a subcategory of gatling guns.

    • @PolymurExcel
      @PolymurExcel 3 роки тому

      @@Neion8 Oh was it? I must have confused the year it was fiished with the year it entered service, my bad. The Maxim/Lewis guns were in service for almost a hundred years though. I do expect the M2 Browning to hit that 100 year mark, the US honestly tried to make a better one but it ultimately failed to be as reliable. They instead went and upgraded them making the M2A1 and the GAU 21.

    • @Neion8
      @Neion8 3 роки тому

      @@PolymurExcel No probs, and yeah I think the M2 browning is a design that will keep with us for as long as guns like it have a place on the battlefield; any changes you make sacrafice something, whether it's reliability, accuracy, rate of fire, cost or ease of maintainance.

    • @Nyx_2142
      @Nyx_2142 3 роки тому

      @@Neion8 Recommend you watch Forgotten Weapons newest video on the M2 for an actual history on it. It just missed WW1 and is technically over 100 years old seeing as it was made in 1918, and saw service officially in 1922.

    • @Neion8
      @Neion8 3 роки тому

      @@Nyx_2142 Okay cheers for the shout, always grateful to be corrected :)

  • @yoloman3607
    @yoloman3607 4 роки тому +11

    Well, the browning m1911 has been around since....1911. Its well over a century old and many variants see service with police or as a choice for military personnel in many countries.

    • @commanderbracey7501
      @commanderbracey7501 3 роки тому +2

      A field knife. (Around for centuries in one form or another)

    • @1014p
      @1014p Рік тому

      Does it act as a vehicle? No it does not. Pretty sure he was pointing out a vehicle platform going that long. At present C-130 is most likely on that path and A-10 Warthog though retired might see a revision update soon.

  • @kingjameson3643
    @kingjameson3643 3 роки тому

    I just found this channel and I'm absolutely loving it. The level of detail you go into is amazing and easy to grasp. Keep up the great work and I look forward to seeing much more.

  • @AscendingBliss
    @AscendingBliss 4 роки тому +2

    For as long as I can remember, Pelicans have been my absolute favorite transport ship out of any sci-fi universe.

  • @Vatniks_are_clowns
    @Vatniks_are_clowns 4 роки тому +4

    Has always been my favorite scifi dropship, such an awesome and unique looking ship. Thanks for the video!

  • @CovfefeDotard
    @CovfefeDotard 4 роки тому +33

    I hope you do a breakdown of the gravemind next

  • @alienatedjam5767
    @alienatedjam5767 4 роки тому +4

    This guy literally makes huge essays on halo! Respect.

  • @justinh6709
    @justinh6709 4 роки тому

    I've been watching you for a while and I love your content!! Really can't wait to see your Chanel explode. Thank you!

  • @letsoveranalyze2135
    @letsoveranalyze2135 4 роки тому +73

    The Halo 4 and 5 Pelicans are inferior to the originals. Glad 343i is going back to the original design.

    • @trinalgalaxy5943
      @trinalgalaxy5943 4 роки тому +3

      lets not jump that gun to early, but we can still have our fingers crossed that it is a return to form.

    • @bryan4194
      @bryan4194 4 роки тому

      Your profile pic is glorious

    • @BrSgtJordan
      @BrSgtJordan 4 роки тому

      @Jeremiah Hyde the D78 is just a D77 with new engines and avionics

    • @AdmiralBison
      @AdmiralBison 4 роки тому

      They are the equivalent to "Spartan" IVs.

    • @deltadude7417
      @deltadude7417 3 роки тому

      yeah but have you heard of C O N D O R

  • @robertwelch2843
    @robertwelch2843 4 роки тому +11

    As an upcoming aerospace engineer, I hate the pelican. As a a Halo fanboy, God is it beautiful. Something about it just does it for me, she has a wonderful design.

    • @MarcusWolfWanders
      @MarcusWolfWanders 4 роки тому

      i work in a factory that casts/finishes the blades for the hot section of jet engines. i feel you on both fronts.

    • @gavinstarks2761
      @gavinstarks2761 4 роки тому

      Is it just physically impossible? Or could the pelican really exist?

    • @irondudeful
      @irondudeful 4 роки тому +2

      @@gavinstarks2761 it would be possible to recreate something similar (like we could make a functional aircraft that looks like it), but the design is impractical so you'd never see anybody do it.
      For one- we don't have efficient propulsion that could lift something like that (the weight) the way it does, and beyond that, to add extra weight/passengers would be even harder.
      Possible? Yea, we could probably do it, but it would cost millions of dollars that no one would be willing to blow. It would fly like a brick.

    • @gavinstarks2761
      @gavinstarks2761 4 роки тому

      Living in False Eyes thanks for the response. Sad but hey maybe in the future

    • @GoldPicard
      @GoldPicard 3 роки тому

      I turned wrenches on H-60's so I feel it too, the VTOL aspects of it I can get behind mostly and the whole "lifting body" ability of the fuselage is maybe believable but it would be nowhere near enough to take most of the weight. But I can kinda maybe believe it could go supersonic if you shove powerful enough engines on it but hypersonic? No.

  • @icyknightmare4592
    @icyknightmare4592 4 роки тому +1

    3:35 While I can't think of anything still in use that's specifically from the 1860s (i'm not counting knives or bayonets), there are some bits of hardware that have been going for over a century, and some will probably be in use for longer than that length of time.
    1. 7.62x54mmR - A Russian rifle cartridge in military service since 1891. Many modern rifles are chambered in 7.62x54, and it won't be going away anytime soon.
    2. Mosin Nagant - Firing the above round, this bolt action rifle has also been in active service since 1891 with a variety of countries.
    3. Kommuna - A Russian salvage ship launched in 1915, and still in active use.
    4. M1911 pistol - In use around the world since 1911, including by some special forces today.
    5. M2 HMG - The M2 has been in use for 87 years, and there are no plans to retire it, even though far newer 12.7mm machine guns exist. It will definitely go over 100 years.
    Halo also makes some predictions about ammo we use today. Maybe some of them will actually last over 500 years. The UNSC regularly uses 7.62x51mm (NATO, since 1954), 12.7x99mm (US, since 1921), and 14.5x114mm (USSR, since 1941).

  • @StrifeA217
    @StrifeA217 4 роки тому

    Yes dude! I was waiting for the Pelican! I love this channel.

  • @halometroid
    @halometroid 4 роки тому +17

    The most sexy ship in the universe

    • @halometroid
      @halometroid 4 роки тому

      @@cancelanime1507 The halo universe is sexy!

    • @trinalgalaxy5943
      @trinalgalaxy5943 4 роки тому +1

      @@cancelanime1507 to each their own, but where the longsword has had significant changes to its look over the course of HCE through HR, the Pelican managed to remain much more consistent in that same span.

    • @waletsplayer7159
      @waletsplayer7159 4 роки тому +1

      I think the phantom is the best looking!

  • @FilterBySubgenre
    @FilterBySubgenre 2 роки тому +3

    for military equipment still in use today from the 1860s you are looking for the Gatling gun of 1861 made by Richard Jordan Gatling. Though a big difference of the m61 gatling gun
    of today vs the original.

  • @ryzokusovai3403
    @ryzokusovai3403 3 роки тому +2

    The pelican is one of my favourite vehicles from any universe and it's just amazing how much detail they put into there stuff like how it works and everything

  • @anthonyboyce6321
    @anthonyboyce6321 4 роки тому

    yo im new on this channel but man your videos are legendary how you are breaking down everything,and making it easy to follow,keep it up bro

  • @_Xerota_
    @_Xerota_ 4 роки тому +5

    My favourite Sci-Fi vehicle, great video dude.

  • @Perseus-17
    @Perseus-17 4 роки тому +14

    Here before the notification!

  • @etiennelelievre4614
    @etiennelelievre4614 4 роки тому

    So happy to see how far your come and doing big numbers now good on you mate

  • @bmxdude1337
    @bmxdude1337 4 роки тому +1

    I love the Pelican. When I first saw it, I was blown away by its majesty.

  • @waletsplayer7159
    @waletsplayer7159 4 роки тому +5

    Try two: Most detailed breakdown of the Ghost, to bring in more of both factions.

  • @barrybend7189
    @barrybend7189 4 роки тому +6

    Oldest issued US military equipment: the standard issue military canoe.

  • @waywardwhiskey117
    @waywardwhiskey117 2 роки тому +2

    I adore this even a year later! Installation00, You would make my entire nerdlife if you did a video for the GA-TL Longsword like this. That would be truly fantastic my guy.

  • @ArchCone
    @ArchCone 4 роки тому +1

    Amazing work as always my good man.

  • @feralprocessor9853
    @feralprocessor9853 4 роки тому +5

    Instalation 00's next video should cover all forms of covenant "spirit" Transport.

  • @PS-mw9cc
    @PS-mw9cc 4 роки тому +5

    Can you please do the albatross dropship next? I love these videos!

  • @Kaiserland111
    @Kaiserland111 3 роки тому +1

    Minor correction: jet fuel does not detonate, it combusts, when in a jet engine. A detonation would explosively destroy the engine, a much less desirable outcome than an exothermic chemical reaction producing hot, expanding exhaust gasses. Fantastic video as usual!

  • @MadGaming_TV
    @MadGaming_TV 3 роки тому +1

    I love the pelicans design. It's so cool. If the military used this irl I would definitely sign an application to pilot one of those bad boys

  • @grantlauzon5237
    @grantlauzon5237 4 роки тому +5

    5:56 So I say to the guy. “If it can carry a tank then why not put the guns on the tank on it and use it instead?”

  • @VNM-Venom252
    @VNM-Venom252 4 роки тому +6

    How does this man do it? He could probably make an hour video about a coffee mug.

    • @sergeantmarcusstackerM1903
      @sergeantmarcusstackerM1903 4 роки тому +2

      He could get Ahoy to narrate, that’ll keep your attention

    • @tristanbackup2536
      @tristanbackup2536 4 роки тому +2

      A true old school geek. We get obsessed with stats, engineering & mathematics of anything.

  • @sqwatchy1010
    @sqwatchy1010 3 роки тому

    As an aircraft mechanic, the breakdown of the engines and propulsion systems was very interesting and very well researched. Of course, I wouldn't expect anything other than a well researched video from the lore master himself. Love these videos sir, and I'm really enjoying the Cartographer series.

  • @LockheedC-130HerculesOfficial
    @LockheedC-130HerculesOfficial 3 роки тому

    5:23
    damn I didn't know I was gonna be mentioned in this video, thanks for the shoutout 👌

  • @starcraftre
    @starcraftre 4 роки тому +6

    "A single example of military equipment still in use after being introduced in the 1860's"
    Pelican has been modified, updated, etc, so using those same terms...
    How about a Gatling Gun? (1862) Still the basis of CIWS, GAU-8 Avenger, Minigun, etc.

    • @Nyx_2142
      @Nyx_2142 4 роки тому

      The Gatling Gun has been a concept for hundreds of years. And if you count prototype gunpowder and arrow weapons that the Chinese and Koreans supposedly made, thousands of years.

  • @blitz3700
    @blitz3700 4 роки тому +4

    3:35, I know it’s not 160 years but the M2 browning HMG has been in service for more than a hundred years which is pretty impressive

    • @ajobdunwell2585
      @ajobdunwell2585 Рік тому

      I think kbar's are still made with bayonet mounts.

    • @cattledog901
      @cattledog901 Рік тому +1

      ​@@ajobdunwell2585 The M2 browning is older than the KABAR and the KABAR was never a bayonet its a knife only. Do you even know what you are talking about?

    • @ajobdunwell2585
      @ajobdunwell2585 Рік тому

      @@cattledog901 excuse me, the M9 (formerly M7) bayonet. Fits the M16 and M4 and is still issued.

    • @cattledog901
      @cattledog901 Рік тому +1

      @@ajobdunwell2585 And the M9 bayonet isn't a KABAR genius it's a seperate design entirely.

    • @ajobdunwell2585
      @ajobdunwell2585 Рік тому

      @@cattledog901 Now explain to me the entirety separate design elements of attaching a knife to a gun barrel. I think that for as long as the US has been fielding an army, they've been equipping those soldiers with bayonets. Updating them to fit the current issue weapon rather than designing the guns to fit the bayonet.

  • @buttholefartgaming3934
    @buttholefartgaming3934 4 роки тому

    I've been wanting in-depth halo vehicle videos, thanks!

  • @danielwest7285
    @danielwest7285 4 роки тому +1

    There is one weapon system that is getting close to the number of years, Browning .50 cal machine gun. Started in 1919, officially issued as of 1921.

  • @zenopssmdk
    @zenopssmdk 4 роки тому +4

    After watching this I'm expecting some revolutionary technology from the mongoose

    • @phoenixjones7191
      @phoenixjones7191 4 роки тому +2

      I mean. It runs on hydrogen. So ya know that's pretty fucking useful.

  • @danielreyesvela6471
    @danielreyesvela6471 4 роки тому +5

    i would love to be a pelican pilot is my dream

  • @JadenIttanenn3
    @JadenIttanenn3 4 роки тому +2

    You challenged us to find a piece of military hardware that's been in use starting in the 1860's... I don't have one of those, the closest I can think of though is the B-52 bomber, the last one built was in the 1960's, and they're trying to push it out to 2060... which is pretty crazy if you think about it

    • @shaq6976
      @shaq6976 4 роки тому

      The Gatling gun was introduced in 1861 and is still in service, it’s only main Upgrade was its use of electric motors rather than spinning the barrels by hand

    • @Nyx_2142
      @Nyx_2142 4 роки тому

      @@Vitekc45c The M1919 still sees some use in other militaries around the world. Not sure if the US still uses them.

  • @nestorgamer9746
    @nestorgamer9746 4 роки тому

    Awesome as always Mr. 00

  • @thesurvivalist.
    @thesurvivalist. 4 роки тому +6

    Make her Slip space capable, and I will take one!
    I hope Elon Musk pays attention to these specs, would love to see one in operation in our time!
    Would love to see an Arc Plasma engine, for space injection!

  • @Tjrissi96
    @Tjrissi96 4 роки тому +1

    Introduced in the 1860's was the Gatling gun, designed by Richard Jordan Gatling.
    Although you no longer crank the gun by hand, its nowadays powered by an electric motor.
    The design was later updated into the Minigun and the M61 Vulcan.

  • @oogaboogaman4180
    @oogaboogaman4180 3 роки тому

    This helped me build a replica of a Pelican so much, *good video.*
    *in a video game obviously*

  • @BattleUnit3
    @BattleUnit3 4 роки тому +1

    A D77-TC Pelican Dropships is a brick. With which you crush the dreams of aliens.

  • @DerekHerchko
    @DerekHerchko 4 роки тому

    The comparison to the C130 really put into perspective for me. Thanks!

  • @Kyokon11
    @Kyokon11 4 роки тому

    I learned about my favorite game and real life science!
    Nice video, like it.

  • @B0tch0
    @B0tch0 8 місяців тому +1

    Just a couple notes:
    Pressure would be 1/3 of a bar. Similar to what can be seen in the space station.
    The weight is likely due to the reactor's shielding. The US made a prototype of a nuclear bomber during the cold war (the USSR also did) both were abandoned due to the immense weight of the reactor and the radiations from the engine design.
    Single stage to orbit is close to impossible with chemical rockets, although a UK company is building a prototype of an engine similar to what was mentioned in the video, minus the nuclear part (I think the project was cancelled quite recently 2023) Nasa is currently working on nuclear propulsion for space applications. A nuclear rocket would probably be impractical and wasteful (and extremely dangerous) within earth gravity but once in space they expect those to be much more efficient than chemical rockets.

  • @SyntaxScout
    @SyntaxScout 4 місяці тому +2

    The pelican use a stronger alloy than titanium with a reflective,anti heating coating,lighter than a C130,with a main ion pulse reactor with massive infinite amounts of power making the Pelican versatile in space or any type of atmosphere.Same technology is used in the main vessels. This technology actually will become a reality for the US military forces.

  • @THEANIMAL359
    @THEANIMAL359 4 роки тому

    I legit could not believe it when I saw this video. I actually lost it lol. Well done man.

  • @hammer1349
    @hammer1349 4 роки тому +1

    The halo infinite pelican definitely looks like it could fit an Abrams in it that's for sure. Gives you a proper feeling of just how big the pelican is on the inside

  • @biglenin7306
    @biglenin7306 4 роки тому

    Damn! 2 most detailed so close together? Thanks bro!

  • @cmbara102
    @cmbara102 3 роки тому

    The US Army still uses the M2 Browning .50 machine gun. Which has been in service since 1933. When I was in the Army, we got to check out some of the Air Force's KC-135 refuelers, and it had been built in 1958. At the time it was 56 years old. So, it makes sense that the Pelican would be in service for that long, based on how long military equipment, aircraft especially, can remain in service.

  • @oneal3224
    @oneal3224 4 роки тому +1

    As an aircraft Mechanic I feel compelled to point out that each stage of the compressor can compress the air at a ratio of 30:1. Meaning the pressure inside the engine is far greater than 30 times the ambient pressure

  • @GretchentheAlligator
    @GretchentheAlligator 4 роки тому

    That thumbnail is so realistic and badass! I wish the UNSC Pelicans were real cause they’re so cool.

  • @xxsickmo7lonzxx524
    @xxsickmo7lonzxx524 4 роки тому

    I was looking forward to this detailed breakdown of the peilcan.

  • @CaptainSovereign
    @CaptainSovereign 4 роки тому +3

    i've been looking forward to this....