@@SCIArcChannel Heh. I'd actually say that it should be taught three ways: 1. The Traditional - but very traditional, i.e. ancient - really focusing on our root psychologies, where people like Vitruvius focused on these sort of divine, mathematical forms. 2. Hypercreative, hyper innovative, out-there designs. 3. Hybrid approach, and everything in the middle. I actually kind of hate the war between traditionalism and modernism. They should be like Yin and Yang, building off of one another. I love the stuff I saw in this video, and I also love stuff that I see in Petra, Jordan. I honestly think the most cutting edge modern architecture and ancient architecture are the two styles I prefer the most. I just hate boring architecture and I want to be a part of facilitating great architecture in the future, although I am not an architect.
@@hellomate639 Thank you for your comment, In fact, what you described as "balance between the two" is what SCI-Arc actually practices. There is a misconceived idea of SCI-Arc being only about Avant grade, Post-Digital, and Post-Human Architecture. When in reality, if you know the school really well, there is a great mix of everything. Different positions, ways of thinking, and discourse. Its a very open-ended school and doesn't practice a single thing or approach. I would highly encourage you to further look into the school to know more about it, instead of judging books by their covers. I know its easier said than done. I fall into that trap as well in many things hahah. But anyway thank you for your comment once again. Oh, and by the way, I am just a student of SCI-Arc.
@@ivanmariscalcampos5374 might be using Processing (code language specifically developed to make visual art) or it could be some plug in for After Effects, or it could be an effect made in the VFX page in DaVinci Resolve c:
It's a hit-or-miss search for new aesthetic forms. Open to failure, as not "anything goes" -- one has to wonder if the idea of centuries-long architectural precedent is sitting outside in some SCI-Arc dumpster. Encouraging experimentation is laudable but some of this work is forgettable, even amateurish.
This feels new and fresh.. and is from 2016. This guys are way ahead the status-quo.
I fucking hate my school. I really want to go SCI - Arc.
This is how we should teach architecture.
:)
@@SCIArcChannel Heh. I'd actually say that it should be taught three ways:
1. The Traditional - but very traditional, i.e. ancient - really focusing on our root psychologies, where people like Vitruvius focused on these sort of divine, mathematical forms.
2. Hypercreative, hyper innovative, out-there designs.
3. Hybrid approach, and everything in the middle.
I actually kind of hate the war between traditionalism and modernism. They should be like Yin and Yang, building off of one another.
I love the stuff I saw in this video, and I also love stuff that I see in Petra, Jordan. I honestly think the most cutting edge modern architecture and ancient architecture are the two styles I prefer the most.
I just hate boring architecture and I want to be a part of facilitating great architecture in the future, although I am not an architect.
@@hellomate639 Thank you for your comment, In fact, what you described as "balance between the two" is what SCI-Arc actually practices. There is a misconceived idea of SCI-Arc being only about Avant grade, Post-Digital, and Post-Human Architecture. When in reality, if you know the school really well, there is a great mix of everything. Different positions, ways of thinking, and discourse. Its a very open-ended school and doesn't practice a single thing or approach. I would highly encourage you to further look into the school to know more about it, instead of judging books by their covers. I know its easier said than done. I fall into that trap as well in many things hahah. But anyway thank you for your comment once again. Oh, and by the way, I am just a student of SCI-Arc.
how did they do the effect at 0:41
In the text
@@ivanmariscalcampos5374 might be using Processing (code language specifically developed to make visual art) or it could be some plug in for After Effects, or it could be an effect made in the VFX page in DaVinci Resolve c:
It can be done in after effects
It's a hit-or-miss search for new aesthetic forms. Open to failure, as not "anything goes" -- one has to wonder if the idea of centuries-long architectural precedent is sitting outside in some SCI-Arc dumpster. Encouraging experimentation is laudable but some of this work is forgettable, even amateurish.