Love how you articulate things so intuitively, so that someone can understand the framework of quantum mechanics, rather than depending on confusing terms to build their internal model.
There's still something i don't understand... If we are supposed to be using simulations to explain the universe, why is it we only use gravity? Why don't we put electromagnetism in the supercomputers as well?
To exactly understand what? At the end of it, mathematical models are for you to be able to confirm what you can calculate with hand (in a super long time). But it doesnt mean that you throw everything in and the computer will find you the missing links in between different subjects. Finite element models are just complex calculators, not omniscient awareness machines.
Ah, a marvelous spectrum of infinitum and yet more to learn despite our lifetime. An adept observation to share here. Extraordinary content for a view alongside this quarter of an evening. Delightful nonetheless." :TBa
These simulations recreate and represent on the larger scale. Electromagnetism, strong, and weak forces, though they are magnitude more powerful than gravity, their properties are mainly observed to interact in the quantum realm. Did that explanation do anything for comprehension? Hope so.
Magnets and electrostaticly charged objects exert contiuous, measurable, attractive or repulisive forces on certain, relatively close materials but electromagnetic implies an energy that oscillates between a potential voltage field and a magnetic field while radiating from its source at the SOL through the medium of space time.
The simple answer is gravity is related to mass. It is a byproduct of the positive force that holds atoms together. The question should be what holds atoms together?
The positive force that holds atoms together is the strong nuclear force (not to be confused with the strong force carried by gluons). This force holds protons and neutrons together by transferring mesons which are spin 0 or 1 particles that are made of a quark and anti-quark (of different varieties so that they don’t annihilate). These mesons have been experimentally measured via particle decays that would only make sense if they exist. Because protons and neutrons are made of quarks, they can interact with the mesons via the strong force which then creates the strong nuclear force as a byproduct of quantum fluctuations and colour confinement (which is the property of the strong force that causes quarks to have to be bound to other quarks). The way that the strength of the strong force (and by extension the strong nuclear force) scales over distance does not match that of gravity (due to colour confinement), and therefore gravity is unlikely to be the byproduct of the force that holds atoms together.
no, the question should be what qualitatively is the vacuum, electric charge, mass and force. as long as physics is willing to embrace irrational dogmatic axioms that are not questioned and all kinds of logical contradictions inherent in quantum mechanics and relativity, there is no answering any fundamental question. modern physics is completely void of philosophy, and outright denies cause and effect. this cannot lead to anything productive. the universe is literally just a fluid medium in motion, and as long as this is denied, no progress will be made. everything can be and has to be explained in terms of fluid mechanics, not irrational childish stuff like "space time", time travel, probabilities or magical balls with magical abstract properties.
@@sshreddderr9409 there is actually a theory that has one differential equation (using only standard vector calculus) that is equivalent to both Newtonian gravity and general relativity (depending on a choice of metric for the dot product and the number of dimensions) that represents gravity as a fluid. The exact equation is v*V(V*v)+tr(DvDv)=-4πρ where V is nabla (can’t type it), * is the dot product, tr is the trace of matrices, Dv is the Jacobean matrix of v, v is the velocity field of the gravity fluid, and ρ is the mass density.
@magma90 I know there have been people who have noticed the analogy between fluid mechanics and gravity and electromagnetism. But Im not concerned with the mathematics of this because it's only quantitative information. My main concern is a qualitative, intuitive and logically consistent description of the universe, because this is what allows discovery through intuition, analogy and comparison. I personally think that through comparison with fluids, it's easy to intuitively understand magnetism and electromagnetic induction. Also, magnetic north poles, electronegative charge and circularly accelerated masses should be anti gravitational, and all of them should loose mass, levitate and fly off if they are sufficiently strong for a sufficiently light device that produces them, which requires orders of magnitude that are difficult to achieve. This has to be possible given the analogy with fluids, and most claimed methods of anti gravity I have read about one way or another boil down to this, even if the people who try to explain it don't necessarily articulate it that way. This works because a magnetic field is a flow field like the one produced by the rotor blades of a helicopter just using the vacuum as a medium. The north pole is the pole where the flow diverges from, and because it pushes against the medium, the medium resists it and exerts a force on the magnetic field, which is obviously very tiny, but if the field is strong enough enough, it can remove significant mass and even propell the field. I would predict that any magnet unaffected by gravity far away from another mass has a thrust in the direction of it's south pole. Gravity pushes the magnet towards any mass, but the north pole of it's magnetic field still gets pushed away from gravity, it's just that normally, the attraction dominates over the repulsion so severely that this isn't measurable unless the magnetic field is extremely strong relative to the magnets mass or maybe in space where gravity is weaker. Another important point is that this also implies that energy can be harvested from the earths gravitational pull by making anti gravity generators move in a circle by putting them on an angle, attaching them to something that can turn and induce coils. You would just need to transfer enough energy into the field for it to overcome the mass, then it would be accelerated away from the earth, and output would exceed input.
10:55 - So what does LIGO detectors are finding about gravitational waves, they've said they detect many gravitational waves all the time, so what is the difference between a "graviton" and gravitational waves? Is gravitational waves a group or a large sum bundle of gravitons? If so, it shouldn't be that complicated to figure out a thought experiment which can be applied in a lab to measure a single garviton.
it is similar analogy to a light wave and photon. There are some "measurements" based on some other relations such as Einstein-Plank constant and relations (which i have read some time ago), and we have some hypothetical wave-lenghts and energies of graviton you mentioned - as a thought experiment.
there is no graviton or photon. they are just waves in a universal medium that are arbitrarily labeled "particles". em waves have quantized wave lengths, but that doesnt mean that waves suddenly are balls. this kind of language does nothing but obscure and hide what is really going on. gravity waves propagate through the same medium as em waves, which is why they can affect light waves and be detected. this obviously must mean that all electromagnetic fields also influence gravity. "space time" ripples is not a thing. "space time" is just a goofy name for a coordinate system that maps spacial coordinates over time. its a mathematical object that describes motion over time. its just an abstraction that ultimately describes the exact same medium that electromagnetism moves through. its literally just different labels, thats it. any magnetic north pole or negative electric charge is repelled by gravity. any magnet is an anti gravity device and can become a free energy device. all that is needed is that it is sufficiently strong for the weight of the device that produces it. a capacitor with a very strong dielectric that is charged with a huge voltage will just fly off if its negative pole is pointing downwards, and the push of gravity is energy that can be harvested.
New technologies, new research tools Let me suggest for schoolchildren and students on one's own to measure the Universe, dark energy, black holes, etc. To do this, I propose two practical devices. «laser tape measure *+reference distance* 1,000,000 m”» and «Michelson-Morley HYBRID Gyroscope, fiber optic 500‡2». I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 500000 (In a laser tape measure, the length of the optical fiber is fixed at 1000000 ) meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 94/94/94 cm, and the weight is 94 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta)
Yeah, I don't like how they keep things secret but shares with a few. It's not like we are going to do anything with the info other than add to our knowledge.
@@Vile_Entity_3545 There's so much unknown and unseen. I'm not making a philosophical or religious statement. Just one of intellectual speculation. There's clearly more out there that we don't know than we do. If you need something to illustrate, *DARK ENERGY* *DARK MATTER*. It seems to be a greater reality but we *cant prove it* - only infer it. Surely, there is more to reality than our limited human senses and intellect can grasp. Thanks for engaging Vile_Entity
@@Vile_Entity_3545 im not a genius nor am i well versed in this but havent scientists transported qubits of information (i think that's corret?) through another "dimension" of space?
as time goes on, the entropy increases. i guess it could be seen as correlating to more space meaning more possible configurations thus resulting in greater entropy yeah i mean at leaast on an intuitive level it makes sense, however entropy presents itself in any and all systems found within the universe that operate over time.
@@No0dl_e-g2i i was pretty good at physical chemistry at uni and although we used entropy a lot, it's meaning less so, especially on cosmological scales. or time. Its like the expansion causes time, but then time like mind is fundamentally change ie difference as Deleuze would put it
I like the confusion regarding gravity " it's not a force , it's the effect of energy on space-time" and then, for the rest of the documentary refer to it as a force .
I have heard gravity explained by the difference between time dilation on the near side of an object vs the rear side of an object, creating a drag that brings an object of smaller mass quicker toward an object of bigger mass.
Looks like Everything in this universe is stuck in unending loop . And Nothing can be proven absolutely .The universe is a mere appearance, and reality is hidden.
But reality is not hidden, that's what's coming to a head here recently. We can see gravity's extra-dimensional-fabric-like qualities. Yet, we are struggling with scientific observation in the face of the unmanipulatable and unobservable. There might literally be nothing we can do with these extra-dimensions, barr creating black holes or gravity wells 50,000 years from now. Science is coming to the point where we will have an answer on whether or not quantum science is anything other than a study on hypotheticals, soon
This is what hindu scriptures and philosophy have thought about universe. This universe has existed and will continue to exist, the maya( illusion) is base of universes, Shiva(matter) and Shakti ( energy's) are responsible for appearance of universes. They also mention of multidimensional and 5:31 multiple univers interlinked. You will never know the true nature because it's keeps evolving. Great importance is given to akash ( space) and dance of matter and energy. Anyway we have come a long way in understanding the mystery. Hope we will have clarity and brake the illusion.
String theory might explain the great attractor, with great Repeller as the big bang in which strings emanate out to the web and the string recoil to form the next cycle of Penrose's CCC.
वर्तमान एक कृती हैं जो आकृति को संमातर करती हैं मतलब यह अनंत और निरंतर हैं पर यह अनेक नहीं हैं । वह खुद ही जुड़ती और छुटती है फिर वोह सामान्य हो व विशेष पर एक हैं । #ज्ञान
any magnetic north pole, electronegative charge or circularly accelerated mass oriented properly is anti gravitational. It doesn't just oppose gravity, it's true anti gravity in the sense that gravity itself is pushing them away from earth. It's just that the order of magnitude required to get them to visibly loose weight and levitate is very large, especially in relation to the weight of the generator, and therefore not observed unless the experiment is deliberately designed to achieve the necessary numbers. The simplest implementation of this would be a capacitor with a very strong dielectric that is charged with a huge voltage. Another one would be to accelerate a conductor ring of high mass in a magnetic and electric field to tremendous speeds, such as a heavy isotope of mercury or some heavy super conductor. any process that can transfer a large enough amount of energy into a field without increasing the mass of the generator should work.
I think about this all the time. Like how we have currents in the ocean. Space time is also like currents. They smash and rub against each other. Squeezing Gas into to stars. Water seems harmless, but when you get into certain depth, it can crush you to jelly.
gravity is a force ,and even if a mass does,not moove ,it still have a gravitationnal pull,,no matter what is the speed of the planets,traveling around the sun,, there gravity pull is directly related to their mass !🤔
Well for those who think gravity is a force ...understand that it is not gravity that holds us to the surface of matter but it's actual " down" . The curvature of space / time caused by mass . Not gravity, but the dielectric field collapse of an object. Down ...down is hard to wrap my mind around specialy understanding how objects in space know which way is down ?
4 motion of fabric is a bubble dimension suspended by the spin. Expanding bubble theory is true. Earth's core is round & spinning. Like water suspends surface mass. ❤❤
I personally think that gravity is a attractive force . Gravity as described is a spacial pressure . The more massive a body the more pressure can be applied .
@@keep_walking_on_grass well,,once resting on the surface of a mass ,time is zero (no more traveling ),but still objects on that mass are beeing attracted ,,,hold a significative weight isn,t it a force that you have to fight to keep holding it,suspend a weight by a spring ,that weight will relatively pull down on that spring why is that?if this is effectively time and space changes by the presence of a mass that is creating gravity ,that gravity act like a force ,doesn,it? so for me gravity is a force! n,b, space for me is filled with something,,because you cannot bend the void ,,if a mass bend space that space as to be something,dark matter maybe??🤔
The entangled granular quantum metric itself supports the point-to-point replication of forces and particles..the metric becomes forces or particles as necessary. The metric structure can be deformed either emergently or under influence, redirecting the trajectories of forces and particles.
You guys need to edit your script. Even a casual listening reveals a number of errors. Also, you use a completely implausible graphic of a black hole in several places that misses the point of the accretion disk’s deflection effect. Cmon, guys!
1:05 “ Everything we think we know about gravity could be wrong” I’m sure everything we think we know about most things are either wrong or incomplete.
Back inbthe 90's a brilliant Argentinian came up with ads cft correspondence, ide love to expand that into multi dimension maths. Maby each dimension requires specific maths. and the truths are in there relationships and correspondence
sending a spacecraft near a planet or even the sun using NEWTONS LAWS with a little correction of EINSTEIN RELATIVITY does perfectly the job,, this in relation with the size of the object in space,,,what if the object is infinitely small with infinite mass, wich laws then could be applyed,??🤔
I came up with this 42 years ago. Oct '82. And these are the why of how galaxies and solar systems rotate around a black hole or star (all stars have black holes at their centers, too). Black holes are nodes in the gravity wave field. The gravity waves are what curves space, which stars and planets and galaxies "fall" into. Back then I stated - NOT predicted - that there were black holes at the center of ALL galaxies - years before the Milky Way's 'black hole' was 'discovered'. And it was lots of years before the idea of black holes in every galaxy was a done deal. But black holes are not what they say. Sorry. I got there first.
Here is another , if you had a tube full of water and you pull the plug you get a spinning funnel shape. Much like a black hole . So why is a black hole seen as a flat warping of space and not a funnel shape?
What if gravity was a results of slight variations in the attractive and repulsive electromagnetic forces which we have normally believed to be equal and opposite,cancelling each other out,that if the attractive forces where slightly stronger than the repulsive forces which would be almost impossible to detect them being so weak and impossible to block all matter being equally attractive despite charge variations which can not neutralise the underlying effect
If I drop a pebble into a glass of water, it displaces the water in the glass. Rasing the water level level then would increase the density at the bottom of the glass due to pressure gradients of water being denser at 100ft than at the surface of a body of water, for example. What if matter displaces space and gravity is the equivalent of some kind of surface tension on a grander scale? A whirlpool displaces water and time is affected by the distance it travels? Lots of food for thought there, perhaps? I have long wondered if space might be equivalent to a liquid, perhaps. So maybe gravity isn't a force so much as an effect of space/time. If a light ray must travel around a massive galaxy/object(s) it has to travel a longer distance. Traveling a longer distance takes time. To stay at 186 Kps but the speed doesn't change means that time must change. If a one second is longer than the last, then time slows down around the object. Does time stop at 186 Kps? Maybe the light ray has already reached its destination "relative" to the rest of the univers. If an object passes through it original flight path, that path must bend and affect the energy level of the light beam and shift to the red side of the spectrum from an observational point of view? I alos believe in the fluidity of thought. If you got this far, good for you. Keep thinking, especially if you disagree with my speculations. Good for you. ;-)
I agree that space is obviously a fluid. I don't know what causes gravity. I think the vacuum is less dense between masses either because they shield each other from the vacuums pressure from the direction of the other mass, or through interference of the incoherent magnetic fields inside the masses causing a low pressure point between them, making the vacuum push them together. I certainly know how magnetism works though, and gravity likely is an effect that emerges from magnetic fields. Whatever its cause is, it's a fluid effect inside the same medium that electromagnetism induces, so electromagnetic fields can be pushed by gravity, and you should be able to harvest the energy of the earths gravity by making it move things horizontally instead of downwards. I think you can build science fiction like technology just with that, but truly understand how gravity arises I think requires a computer simulation of a fluid model of various magnetic flow fields interacting with each other. I think to get at how matter truly comes to be requires studying vorticity in superfluous. It should be eventually possible to create any material from electromagnetic energy alone.
Newton described gravitation as a universal force, and claimed that "the forces which keep the planets in their orbs must [be] reciprocally as the squares of their distances from the centers about which they revolve." I believe he was very careful to not describe gravity as an attraction, repulsive, differential or any other descriptor due to not having the evidence to support any descriptor. Why anyone would put forth some sort of magical "attraction" theory between celestial objects is I can only guess they had(/have?) an agenda to stall the discoveries of correct (complete) laws of universe physics. What about all the energy being emitted from all the stars in the universe, moving in literally every direction at the speed of light and due to being in motion for billions of years, be a sort of " push" force so that there would be a differential of these push forces between any two celestial objects? I can easily imagine that happening. Even if it isn't correct, at least it could be a possible solution. I know of no theory on the mechanics of how an attractive gravitational force could work. Doesn't anyone else see the errors that have been made? How does no one else notice the flagrant incomplete assumptions that are quite routinely made? Like the M&M exp. Showed no interference pattern so it's assumed it is the correct experiment to perform and therefore assume no aether and therefore assume red-shift is a Doppler effect and then the big assumption that the universe is expanding. Again, is this really not obvious to everyone? Light("EM") energy cannot be digital. Do the math!. It can only be a wave therefore there must be, I believe, a medium for all that energy bouncing around around the universe for only God knows how long. Big bang, what an utterly ridiculous theory. I really believe and hope all those involved in this "conspiracy" will be found out and be very embarrassed and/or roll over in their graves. Unfortunately, these people seem to have a stranglehold on this scientific institution so we may not have the correct laws for a long time, which is extremely unfair for the human race.
Gravity is a Material/element that has modified/morphed or is a natural element that is super heavy or could be as light as weightless. ! BUT IT HAS A PROPERTY INNITS STRUCTURE THAT IS ATTRACTED TO EVERYTHING!! Simple as that !! THE PROOF IS IN MAGNETISM ! If a magnet can attract ferrous metal then there could be another item that attracts everything
If gravity is a force then so is inertia because what ever scale you use to measure gravity and use the same scale to measure inertia they are directly related .take away from one will increase the other by an equal measure.
How can the theoretical "graviton be massless if it interacts with mass? I understand if gravity travels at the speed of light it must be massless. Gravity is not the result of mass but the distortion of the space the mass occupies. This" distortion is a well in space that bends the path of all objects traveling near it. The larger the mass the deeper (or stronger) the well or "force" we call gravity.
vibrational shockwaves from star activity which becomes compressed around a solid object in that space and warps it pushing downward toward the center of that object...i cant believe that people think the higgsfield is just there...ask what powers the field and you can figure out everything backwards...dont just look at the result of it and just say duh
Space and its vacuum creates force or pressure on an object. The larger the object the more force. This force is gravity and involves everything in space.
While gravity is close to the right answer it will never meet the goal. Like a repeating division.333 repeating X 3 will never equate to one no matter how close it gets
Expand of knowledge is not just study same subject with section still unknown or needs more details...some of it because try to find human every day problem... solution , example energy, today already found use magnetic rotation not fusion nukes....🥸...time move... try to find something probably solution rather than reach unknown...but good for extra knowledge...I think the foundation of this knowledge was,that person have reason to find answers other words they have objective.... rather than blind... not objective to expand more but have reason for benefits humanity...that make them forward...not this day they missing real objective... just opinion
Gravity is not a physical plane force, nor is it an ether vortex force. It works due to super ether forces which are very fine but they pull at the cores of all matter,
Better to say as Nassim Armenian mentioned to call it space_ memory and yet to go beyond dualities memory happens in virtual space and entanglement happens in virtual space though there is only one base ground that name rest to be defined .
What I find weird about gravity is how it only weakens over distance.. ...its such a small force in it's smallest force but when you have planets and stars generating gravity its a huge force which never weakens no matter how many objects it is influencing... Also it can't be blocked but yet it can be bent...mainly by itself mind boggling
For years the term "Einstein said/found/thought:..." I think his name may been used to say, "The science is settled" by some folk perhaps? It seems to use the "Monty Python" insinuation, "Nudge, nudge! Wink, wink! Say no more! Say no more?" Seems a bit congruent to me, maybe.
New technologies, new research tools Let me suggest for schoolchildren and students on one's own to measure the Universe, dark energy, black holes, etc. To do this, I propose two practical devices. «laser tape measure *+reference distance* 1,000,000 m”» and «Michelson-Morley HYBRID Gyroscope, fiber optic 500‡2». I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 500000 (In a laser tape measure, the length of the optical fiber is fixed at 1000000 ) meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 94/94/94 cm, and the weight is 94 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta)
Hi,as I say hope the communauty start to figure out I did not create hypotheses and theory juste for fun 😎 Philippe Martin so we can finaly do lots of stuff that humanity needs big Time,
It does not make sense when you think atrophy creates gravity one super reason you’re saying the planets stars the galaxies create atrophy so intern it creates gravity there’s no logic in that because it takes gravity to create stars in in the plants along with the Higgs boson and virtual particles which is a little more complex I could be wrong I think any intelligent man will admit he can be wrong
Since gravity acts over long distances, why would it fit into the small quantum world in the first place? Perhaps look for non- quantum gravity instead; whatever that would be.
Touche'. It's about time someone brought this up. Electricity & magnetism DO work in space at large distances (e.g. cosmic web being electromagnetic filaments connecting galaxies, stars & planets.)
Love how you articulate things so intuitively, so that someone can understand the framework of quantum mechanics, rather than depending on confusing terms to build their internal model.
This is one of the best channels on space science on UA-cam. Many thanks for all the great work.
The more we learn the more questions we have. 😊
I know that i know nothing opens the door to can be know everything ❤
Are you declaring and submitting this as a postulate for peer review? With the equations and theory to follow post haste, yes? 🤔
The first 30 minutes was very educational. Thanks to Narrator.
You explained SPIN so ingeniously, a thousand thanks to you.
There's still something i don't understand... If we are supposed to be using simulations to explain the universe, why is it we only use gravity? Why don't we put electromagnetism in the supercomputers as well?
Because our primitive prequantum computers are garbage and couldn't handle it
Gravity is dominate on large scales
To exactly understand what? At the end of it, mathematical models are for you to be able to confirm what you can calculate with hand (in a super long time). But it doesnt mean that you throw everything in and the computer will find you the missing links in between different subjects. Finite element models are just complex calculators, not omniscient awareness machines.
because we need an equation that unifies them.
@No0dl_e-g2i
As long as the mass at the pointbof singularity has mass but zero volune, we won't unify anything
Absolutely eye opening my friend
Thank you so much for your help and hard work ❤
Space matters your videos constantly very impress me.🌠
Although it's just AI?
Ah, a marvelous spectrum of infinitum and yet more to learn despite our lifetime.
An adept observation to share here. Extraordinary content for a view alongside this quarter of an evening. Delightful nonetheless."
:TBa
Great video. I shared it with my grandsons who are majoring in physics / astrophysics.
Thx for the outstanding content.
Electromagnetic universe
Electromagnetism only exists in the material realm not the dark matter or dark energy realm. Electromagnetism is chemistry.
These simulations recreate and represent on the larger scale. Electromagnetism, strong, and weak forces, though they are magnitude more powerful than gravity, their properties are mainly observed to interact in the quantum realm. Did that explanation do anything for comprehension? Hope so.
Great description of thoughts & wonderful movie I have seen uptill now.
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 wow super nice
Magnets and electrostaticly charged objects exert contiuous, measurable, attractive or repulisive forces on certain, relatively close materials but electromagnetic implies an energy that oscillates between a potential voltage field and a magnetic field while radiating from its source at the SOL through the medium of space time.
Great and can’t touch by heart 💜
The simple answer is gravity is related to mass. It is a byproduct of the positive force that holds atoms together. The question should be what holds atoms together?
The positive force that holds atoms together is the strong nuclear force (not to be confused with the strong force carried by gluons). This force holds protons and neutrons together by transferring mesons which are spin 0 or 1 particles that are made of a quark and anti-quark (of different varieties so that they don’t annihilate). These mesons have been experimentally measured via particle decays that would only make sense if they exist. Because protons and neutrons are made of quarks, they can interact with the mesons via the strong force which then creates the strong nuclear force as a byproduct of quantum fluctuations and colour confinement (which is the property of the strong force that causes quarks to have to be bound to other quarks). The way that the strength of the strong force (and by extension the strong nuclear force) scales over distance does not match that of gravity (due to colour confinement), and therefore gravity is unlikely to be the byproduct of the force that holds atoms together.
no, the question should be what qualitatively is the vacuum, electric charge, mass and force. as long as physics is willing to embrace irrational dogmatic axioms that are not questioned and all kinds of logical contradictions inherent in quantum mechanics and relativity, there is no answering any fundamental question.
modern physics is completely void of philosophy, and outright denies cause and effect. this cannot lead to anything productive.
the universe is literally just a fluid medium in motion, and as long as this is denied, no progress will be made. everything can be and has to be explained in terms of fluid mechanics, not irrational childish stuff like "space time", time travel, probabilities or magical balls with magical abstract properties.
@@sshreddderr9409 there is actually a theory that has one differential equation (using only standard vector calculus) that is equivalent to both Newtonian gravity and general relativity (depending on a choice of metric for the dot product and the number of dimensions) that represents gravity as a fluid. The exact equation is v*V(V*v)+tr(DvDv)=-4πρ where V is nabla (can’t type it), * is the dot product, tr is the trace of matrices, Dv is the Jacobean matrix of v, v is the velocity field of the gravity fluid, and ρ is the mass density.
@magma90 I know there have been people who have noticed the analogy between fluid mechanics and gravity and electromagnetism.
But Im not concerned with the mathematics of this because it's only quantitative information. My main concern is a qualitative, intuitive and logically consistent description of the universe, because this is what allows discovery through intuition, analogy and comparison.
I personally think that through comparison with fluids, it's easy to intuitively understand magnetism and electromagnetic induction.
Also, magnetic north poles, electronegative charge and circularly accelerated masses should be anti gravitational, and all of them should loose mass, levitate and fly off if they are sufficiently strong for a sufficiently light device that produces them, which requires orders of magnitude that are difficult to achieve. This has to be possible given the analogy with fluids, and most claimed methods of anti gravity I have read about one way or another boil down to this, even if the people who try to explain it don't necessarily articulate it that way.
This works because a magnetic field is a flow field like the one produced by the rotor blades of a helicopter just using the vacuum as a medium. The north pole is the pole where the flow diverges from, and because it pushes against the medium, the medium resists it and exerts a force on the magnetic field, which is obviously very tiny, but if the field is strong enough enough, it can remove significant mass and even propell the field.
I would predict that any magnet unaffected by gravity far away from another mass has a thrust in the direction of it's south pole.
Gravity pushes the magnet towards any mass, but the north pole of it's magnetic field still gets pushed away from gravity, it's just that normally, the attraction dominates over the repulsion so severely that this isn't measurable unless the magnetic field is extremely strong relative to the magnets mass or maybe in space where gravity is weaker.
Another important point is that this also implies that energy can be harvested from the earths gravitational pull by making anti gravity generators move in a circle by putting them on an angle, attaching them to something that can turn and induce coils. You would just need to transfer enough energy into the field for it to overcome the mass, then it would be accelerated away from the earth, and output would exceed input.
@magma90Wow. Thank you for the nice logic and comprehensiveness.
WHAT!! Holy ----! 10:45 (concerning graviton detectors) 😬
10:55 - So what does LIGO detectors are finding about gravitational waves, they've said they detect many gravitational waves all the time, so what is the difference between a "graviton" and gravitational waves? Is gravitational waves a group or a large sum bundle of gravitons? If so, it shouldn't be that complicated to figure out a thought experiment which can be applied in a lab to measure a single garviton.
it is similar analogy to a light wave and photon. There are some "measurements" based on some other relations such as Einstein-Plank constant and relations (which i have read some time ago), and we have some hypothetical wave-lenghts and energies of graviton you mentioned - as a thought experiment.
there is no graviton or photon. they are just waves in a universal medium that are arbitrarily labeled "particles". em waves have quantized wave lengths, but that doesnt mean that waves suddenly are balls. this kind of language does nothing but obscure and hide what is really going on.
gravity waves propagate through the same medium as em waves, which is why they can affect light waves and be detected. this obviously must mean that all electromagnetic fields also influence gravity.
"space time" ripples is not a thing. "space time" is just a goofy name for a coordinate system that maps spacial coordinates over time. its a mathematical object that describes motion over time. its just an abstraction that ultimately describes the exact same medium that electromagnetism moves through. its literally just different labels, thats it.
any magnetic north pole or negative electric charge is repelled by gravity. any magnet is an anti gravity device and can become a free energy device. all that is needed is that it is sufficiently strong for the weight of the device that produces it. a capacitor with a very strong dielectric that is charged with a huge voltage will just fly off if its negative pole is pointing downwards, and the push of gravity is energy that can be harvested.
Mass under compression is the development of gravitational pull. The greater the collective mass the greater the gravitational force.
New technologies, new research tools
Let me suggest for schoolchildren and students on one's own to measure the Universe, dark energy, black holes, etc. To do this, I propose two practical devices. «laser tape measure *+reference distance* 1,000,000 m”» and «Michelson-Morley HYBRID Gyroscope, fiber optic 500‡2». I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 500000 (In a laser tape measure, the length of the optical fiber is fixed at 1000000 ) meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 94/94/94 cm, and the weight is 94 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions.
Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven:
Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta)
Surely there's deeper more pround 'levels' of reality that we are not privy too.
Yeah, I don't like how they keep things secret but shares with a few. It's not like we are going to do anything with the info other than add to our knowledge.
Prove it
@@Vile_Entity_3545 prove what? Knowledge or kept knowledge, or speculation of the deep unknown.
@@Vile_Entity_3545 There's so much unknown and unseen. I'm not making a philosophical or religious statement. Just one of intellectual speculation. There's clearly more out there that we don't know than we do. If you need something to illustrate, *DARK ENERGY* *DARK MATTER*. It seems to be a greater reality but we *cant prove it* - only infer it. Surely, there is more to reality than our limited human senses and intellect can grasp. Thanks for engaging Vile_Entity
@@Vile_Entity_3545 im not a genius nor am i well versed in this but havent scientists transported qubits of information (i think that's corret?) through another "dimension" of space?
1:02:19 super nice graphic
so as the Universe expands, it's entropy increases as a result (more space, more possible configurations)?
as time goes on, the entropy increases. i guess it could be seen as correlating to more space meaning more possible configurations thus resulting in greater entropy yeah i mean at leaast on an intuitive level it makes sense, however entropy presents itself in any and all systems found within the universe that operate over time.
@@No0dl_e-g2i i was pretty good at physical chemistry at uni and although we used entropy a lot, it's meaning less so, especially on cosmological scales. or time. Its like the expansion causes time, but then time like mind is fundamentally change ie difference as Deleuze would put it
I like the confusion regarding gravity " it's not a force , it's the effect of energy on space-time" and then, for the rest of the documentary refer to it as a force .
I have heard gravity explained by the difference between time dilation on the near side of an object vs the rear side of an object, creating a drag that brings an object of smaller mass quicker toward an object of bigger mass.
That's 100% it
Looks like Everything in this universe is stuck in unending loop .
And Nothing can be proven absolutely .The universe is a mere appearance, and reality is hidden.
Well said
But reality is not hidden, that's what's coming to a head here recently. We can see gravity's extra-dimensional-fabric-like qualities. Yet, we are struggling with scientific observation in the face of the unmanipulatable and unobservable. There might literally be nothing we can do with these extra-dimensions, barr creating black holes or gravity wells 50,000 years from now. Science is coming to the point where we will have an answer on whether or not quantum science is anything other than a study on hypotheticals, soon
"The universe is a mere appearance, and reality is hidden" i have been trying to put that into words for a long time, thank you!!
Reality is saying the same thing...
This is what hindu scriptures and philosophy have thought about universe. This universe has existed and will continue to exist, the maya( illusion) is base of universes, Shiva(matter) and Shakti ( energy's) are responsible for appearance of universes. They also mention of multidimensional and 5:31 multiple univers interlinked. You will never know the true nature because it's keeps evolving. Great importance is given to akash ( space) and dance of matter and energy.
Anyway we have come a long way in understanding the mystery. Hope we will have clarity and brake the illusion.
String theory might explain the great attractor, with great Repeller as the big bang in which strings emanate out to the web and the string recoil to form the next cycle of Penrose's CCC.
वर्तमान एक कृती हैं जो आकृति को संमातर करती हैं मतलब यह अनंत और निरंतर हैं पर यह अनेक नहीं हैं । वह खुद ही जुड़ती और छुटती है फिर वोह सामान्य हो व विशेष पर एक हैं । #ज्ञान
Centrifugal force opposes gravity
any magnetic north pole, electronegative charge or circularly accelerated mass oriented properly is anti gravitational. It doesn't just oppose gravity, it's true anti gravity in the sense that gravity itself is pushing them away from earth. It's just that the order of magnitude required to get them to visibly loose weight and levitate is very large, especially in relation to the weight of the generator, and therefore not observed unless the experiment is deliberately designed to achieve the necessary numbers.
The simplest implementation of this would be a capacitor with a very strong dielectric that is charged with a huge voltage.
Another one would be to accelerate a conductor ring of high mass in a magnetic and electric field to tremendous speeds, such as a heavy isotope of mercury or some heavy super conductor.
any process that can transfer a large enough amount of energy into a field without increasing the mass of the generator should work.
Who is the narrator? Love the voice.
I think about this all the time. Like how we have currents in the ocean. Space time is also like currents. They smash and rub against each other. Squeezing Gas into to stars. Water seems harmless, but when you get into certain depth, it can crush you to jelly.
Great video
gravity is a force ,and even if a mass does,not moove ,it still have a gravitationnal pull,,no matter what is the speed of the planets,traveling around the sun,, there gravity pull is directly related to their mass !🤔
A graviton detector will also make your car go fast .......
What if gravity is the result Of the movement Of time itself?
Yes, yes. This is the feeling I have as well
But isn't time a function of movement?
@@RatzoBHarris time is the relative measurement of a secuence of events wich is constantly MOViNG forward
@@RatzoBHarris I’m not good at Math enough to prove it but i feel it that way
but time stops when the gravitational force is strong enough and if there's no time moving there then gravity would not emerge
GG Discovery channel, you had a good run.
Well for those who think gravity is a force ...understand that it is not gravity that holds us to the surface of matter but it's actual " down" . The curvature of space / time caused by mass . Not gravity, but the dielectric field collapse of an object. Down ...down is hard to wrap my mind around specialy understanding how objects in space know which way is down ?
this video is great example how much they not have a clou at all..
clue
You know maybe I have a answer or maybe I don’t but definitely I have a insane imagination:)
4 motion of fabric is a bubble dimension suspended by the spin. Expanding bubble theory is true. Earth's core is round & spinning. Like water suspends surface mass. ❤❤
I believe dimensions are unlimited.
I personally think that gravity is a attractive force . Gravity as described is a spacial pressure . The more massive a body the more pressure can be applied .
The first 10 minutes were mostly a repeat of what was stated in the first 2 minutes
Thank you. You saved me from losing 10 minutes of life. 😅
@@OnlyJalenPhd 👍🤣🤣🤣
Its already known gravity isn't a force.
@johnny71c-f4s wrong ,it,s gravity that as an effect on time and space !
@@robertpotvin8872 isn't it the mass that affects time and space and that effect is what we consider gravity?
@@keep_walking_on_grass well,,once resting on the surface of a mass ,time is zero (no more traveling ),but still objects on that mass are beeing attracted ,,,hold a significative weight isn,t it a force that you have to fight to keep holding it,suspend a weight by a spring ,that weight will relatively pull down on that spring why is that?if this is effectively time and space changes by the presence of a mass that is creating gravity ,that gravity act like a force ,doesn,it? so for me gravity is a force! n,b, space for me is filled with something,,because you cannot bend the void ,,if a mass bend space that space as to be something,dark matter maybe??🤔
Isn't it a fundamental force?
The entangled granular quantum metric itself supports the point-to-point replication of forces and particles..the metric becomes forces or particles as necessary. The metric structure can be deformed either emergently or under influence, redirecting the trajectories of forces and particles.
Arent strings frequency bands?
Our discovery of a single new dimension will unlock the understanding of just the one and not all. Therefore the keys need new approaches to be cut.
Gravity is space and the plasma of matter attracting each other while the space within matter repells.
You guys need to edit your script. Even a casual listening reveals a number of errors.
Also, you use a completely implausible graphic of a black hole in several places that misses the point of the accretion disk’s deflection effect. Cmon, guys!
1:05 “ Everything we think we know about gravity could be wrong”
I’m sure everything we think we know about most things are either wrong or incomplete.
Background music too loud
Back inbthe 90's a brilliant Argentinian came up with ads cft correspondence, ide love to expand that into multi dimension maths. Maby each dimension requires specific maths. and the truths are in there relationships and correspondence
multidimensional math exists in string theory
Einstein himself said to not rely on the geometric interpretation to describe gravity.
sending a spacecraft near a planet or even the sun using NEWTONS LAWS with a little correction of EINSTEIN RELATIVITY does perfectly the job,, this in relation with the size of the object in space,,,what if the object is infinitely small with infinite mass, wich laws then could be applyed,??🤔
It is energy form. Mass at distance attached by higher mass releases heat
I came up with this 42 years ago. Oct '82. And these are the why of how galaxies and solar systems rotate around a black hole or star (all stars have black holes at their centers, too). Black holes are nodes in the gravity wave field. The gravity waves are what curves space, which stars and planets and galaxies "fall" into. Back then I stated - NOT predicted - that there were black holes at the center of ALL galaxies - years before the Milky Way's 'black hole' was 'discovered'. And it was lots of years before the idea of black holes in every galaxy was a done deal. But black holes are not what they say. Sorry. I got there first.
might gravitons form at surface area on event horizon of black hole? carry quantum information in each Planck area?
I keep falling for this. Most accidents and mishaps are blamed for this invisible something else.
Here is another , if you had a tube full of water and you pull the plug you get a spinning funnel shape. Much like a black hole . So why is a black hole seen as a flat warping of space and not a funnel shape?
at time stamped 3:55, thats was other things he talked about, which not part of his theory of relativity
What if gravity was a results of slight variations in the attractive and repulsive electromagnetic forces which we have normally believed to be equal and opposite,cancelling each other out,that if the attractive forces where slightly stronger than the repulsive forces which would be almost impossible to detect them being so weak and impossible to block all matter being equally attractive despite charge variations which can not neutralise the underlying effect
If I drop a pebble into a glass of water, it displaces the water in the glass.
Rasing the water level level then would increase the density at the bottom of the glass due to pressure gradients of water being denser at 100ft than at the surface of a body of water, for example.
What if matter displaces space and gravity is the equivalent of some kind of surface tension on a grander scale? A whirlpool displaces water and time is affected by the distance it travels?
Lots of food for thought there, perhaps?
I have long wondered if space might be equivalent to a liquid, perhaps.
So maybe gravity isn't a force so much as an effect of space/time.
If a light ray must travel around a massive galaxy/object(s) it has to travel a longer distance.
Traveling a longer distance takes time. To stay at 186 Kps but the speed doesn't change means that time must change. If a one second is longer than the last, then time slows down around the object. Does time stop at 186 Kps? Maybe the light ray has already reached its destination "relative" to the rest of the univers. If an object passes through it original flight path, that path must bend and affect the energy level of the light beam and shift to the red side of the spectrum from an observational point of view?
I alos believe in the fluidity of thought. If you got this far, good for you. Keep thinking, especially if you disagree with my speculations. Good for you. ;-)
I agree that space is obviously a fluid. I don't know what causes gravity. I think the vacuum is less dense between masses either because they shield each other from the vacuums pressure from the direction of the other mass, or through interference of the incoherent magnetic fields inside the masses causing a low pressure point between them, making the vacuum push them together.
I certainly know how magnetism works though, and gravity likely is an effect that emerges from magnetic fields.
Whatever its cause is, it's a fluid effect inside the same medium that electromagnetism induces, so electromagnetic fields can be pushed by gravity, and you should be able to harvest the energy of the earths gravity by making it move things horizontally instead of downwards.
I think you can build science fiction like technology just with that, but truly understand how gravity arises I think requires a computer simulation of a fluid model of various magnetic flow fields interacting with each other. I think to get at how matter truly comes to be requires studying vorticity in superfluous.
It should be eventually possible to create any material from electromagnetic energy alone.
10:50 so a "graviton detector" is exactly a turbo charger for an internal combustion engine? What the hell?
Gravity is the result of difference in motions
Since Gravity is not a true force then I often wonder why Physicists insist it has to be described in Quantum Physics.
Newton described gravitation as a universal force, and claimed that "the forces which keep the planets in their orbs must [be] reciprocally as the squares of their distances from the centers about which they revolve." I believe he was very careful to not describe gravity as an attraction, repulsive, differential or any other descriptor due to not having the evidence to support any descriptor. Why anyone would put forth some sort of magical "attraction" theory between celestial objects is I can only guess they had(/have?) an agenda to stall the discoveries of correct (complete) laws of universe physics. What about all the energy being emitted from all the stars in the universe, moving in literally every direction at the speed of light and due to being in motion for billions of years, be a sort of " push" force so that there would be a differential of these push forces between any two celestial objects? I can easily imagine that happening. Even if it isn't correct, at least it could be a possible solution. I know of no theory on the mechanics of how an attractive gravitational force could work. Doesn't anyone else see the errors that have been made? How does no one else notice the flagrant incomplete assumptions that are quite routinely made? Like the M&M exp. Showed no interference pattern so it's assumed it is the correct experiment to perform and therefore assume no aether and therefore assume red-shift is a Doppler effect and then the big assumption that the universe is expanding. Again, is this really not obvious to everyone? Light("EM") energy cannot be digital. Do the math!. It can only be a wave therefore there must be, I believe, a medium for all that energy bouncing around around the universe for only God knows how long. Big bang, what an utterly ridiculous theory. I really believe and hope all those involved in this "conspiracy" will be found out and be very embarrassed and/or roll over in their graves. Unfortunately, these people seem to have a stranglehold on this scientific institution so we may not have the correct laws for a long time, which is extremely unfair for the human race.
Why does this video show a picture of a turbo when talking about a graviton detector
E=mc^2 is the recipe for frozen gravity!
Gravity is a Material/element that has modified/morphed or is a natural element that is super heavy or could be as light as weightless. ! BUT IT HAS A PROPERTY INNITS STRUCTURE THAT IS ATTRACTED TO EVERYTHING!! Simple as that !! THE PROOF IS IN MAGNETISM ! If a magnet can attract ferrous metal then there could be another item that attracts everything
At 10:50 why are you showing a car turbo charger as a planet sized Graviton Detector?
The one thing I don't get about gravity is why doesn't everything eventually come together???
5:23 Strong nuclear shows up twice in the diagram
could it be there are heavy elements in space that warp the space around it.
If gravity is a force then so is inertia because what ever scale you use to measure gravity and use the same scale to measure inertia they are directly related .take away from one will increase the other by an equal measure.
How can the theoretical "graviton be massless if it interacts with mass? I understand if gravity travels at the speed of light it must be massless. Gravity is not the result of mass but the distortion of the space the mass occupies. This" distortion is a well in space that bends the path of all objects traveling near it. The larger the mass the deeper (or stronger) the well or "force" we call gravity.
vibrational shockwaves from star activity which becomes compressed around a solid object in that space and warps it pushing downward toward the center of that object...i cant believe that people think the higgsfield is just there...ask what powers the field and you can figure out everything backwards...dont just look at the result of it and just say duh
Space and its vacuum creates force or pressure on an object. The larger the object the more force. This force is gravity and involves everything in space.
Gravity is the result of the formation of matter with mass that quantifies time and distance.
While gravity is close to the right answer it will never meet the goal. Like a repeating division.333 repeating X 3 will never equate to one no matter how close it gets
Expand of knowledge is not just study same subject with section still unknown or needs more details...some of it because try to find human every day problem... solution , example energy, today already found use magnetic rotation not fusion nukes....🥸...time move... try to find something probably solution rather than reach unknown...but good for extra knowledge...I think the foundation of this knowledge was,that person have reason to find answers other words they have objective.... rather than blind... not objective to expand more but have reason for benefits humanity...that make them forward...not this day they missing real objective... just opinion
Gravity is not a physical plane force, nor is it an ether vortex force. It works due to super ether forces which are very fine but they pull at the cores of all matter,
Gravity is not a force. It’s an illusion of geometry.
Was it behind a space ship?
I love the though❤please someone show me ❤
Gravity only attracts objects with a positive mass
Better to say as Nassim Armenian mentioned to call it space_ memory and yet to go beyond dualities memory happens in virtual space and entanglement happens in virtual space though there is only one base ground that name rest to be defined .
Instead of graviton I envision hot magma holding a magnetic charge to electrons which may originate from the nucleus itself due to nuclear chemistry
What I find weird about gravity is how it only weakens over distance..
...its such a small force in it's smallest force but when you have planets and stars generating gravity its a huge force which never weakens no matter how many objects it is influencing... Also it can't be blocked but yet it can be bent...mainly by itself
mind boggling
Quantum foam is merely the fluctuations of spacetime-gravity. The universe not yet being able to decide whether to come into existence or not.
The force of gravity is what comprised the force that preceded the so called big bang and its separation into individual galaxies.
😂 he said "there may be 10 dimensions, OR EVEN UP TO ELEVEN!" 😂😂 like ten is plausible but 11 is where we draw the line 😂
Problem is some don't like infinity, it breaks their brain cells, so if that might be the issue it will have to wait.
For years the term "Einstein said/found/thought:..."
I think his name may been used to say, "The science is settled" by some folk perhaps?
It seems to use the "Monty Python" insinuation, "Nudge, nudge! Wink, wink! Say no more! Say no more?" Seems a bit congruent to me, maybe.
New technologies, new research tools
Let me suggest for schoolchildren and students on one's own to measure the Universe, dark energy, black holes, etc. To do this, I propose two practical devices. «laser tape measure *+reference distance* 1,000,000 m”» and «Michelson-Morley HYBRID Gyroscope, fiber optic 500‡2». I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 500000 (In a laser tape measure, the length of the optical fiber is fixed at 1000000 ) meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 94/94/94 cm, and the weight is 94 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions.
Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven:
Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta)
Hi,as I say hope the communauty start to figure out I did not create hypotheses and theory juste for fun 😎 Philippe Martin so we can finaly do lots of stuff that humanity needs big Time,
It does not make sense when you think atrophy creates gravity one super reason you’re saying the planets stars the galaxies create atrophy so intern it creates gravity there’s no logic in that because it takes gravity to create stars in in the plants along with the Higgs boson and virtual particles which is a little more complex I could be wrong I think any intelligent man will admit he can be wrong
🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷
Since gravity acts over long distances, why would it fit into the small quantum world in the first place? Perhaps look for non- quantum gravity instead; whatever that would be.
"Everything we think we know about gravity may be wrong.". Next video!
Touche'.
It's about time someone brought this up.
Electricity & magnetism DO work in space at large distances (e.g. cosmic web being electromagnetic filaments connecting galaxies, stars & planets.)
It’s like 2012 old news
We don't understand our own reality..how are we ever gonna know what is real and what is not?