It is, and my friend is one and literally a couple weeks before all this, she seemed more stressed with all the DEI BS. Which I found very interesting that Trump immediately called them out, makes me wonder what’s really going on in those towers.
I went to A&P school with a recently fired ATC man (Regan fired them all when they went on strike) and he said getting fired was the best thing that ever happened to him. He'd been having multiple health issues that all went away after losing his job. That kind of stress is not good for you...and being understaffed makes a difficult job even worse.
@@joesmith4443I knew some idiot would blame Trump for this Lear jet explosion. And egg prices went up because Biden forced farms to slaughter 100 million chickens last year. FJB
It is doubtful that the engines stopped on the LearJet. ADS-B radar data, which uses inputs from the plane's avionics systems indicated that the aircraft was over 200 knots most of the time. Furthermore, with an overcast ceiling of between 400 and 600 feet no one could have seen the airplane 'stop in mid air.' It climbed to about 1,600' or so, and then at some point, nosed over. It was travelling at over 11,000' per minute on it's final radar data. If the ceiling was overcast to 600', it would have been only seen for three or four seconds max. This is proven in the door cam video were we seen the aircraft appear out of the clouds and impact the ground within a few seconds. Also, audio for that video appears to indicate that the engines were both developing full power. So, anyone would be hard pressed to convince me that the engines had failed on the aircraft. One of the most plausible things I have heard so far is 'spatial disorientation' where the pilot, once entering the clouds loses his reference to the ground. Having experienced this personally, I know how important it is to get on the instruments. But, I even have issues with this. Both pilots would need to have this happen to them at the same time, and that is unlikely. What I would believe more would be a catastrophic avionics failure. I don't know if '-UCI' had analog gauges or EFIS gauges, but a failure of a specific electrical buss or multiple busses might have caused the Attitude Indicators to trip offline, and in the clouds, that's the absolute worst place for it to happen. Was there an explosion on the aircraft? We don't know. Tower cleared them to take off on runway 24 and then turn right to a heading of 290, or a 50º turn. Radar data indicated they began the turn as they were climbing, but didn't get very far into the turn and then the aircraft started back to the left and started descending. We don't know the details, we may never know the details.
It's obvious that the plane was on fire prior to impact. What was the source of the fire? Engine exceeded fan surge margin from ingesting rain is the most likely explanation.
@@GaryMCurran , hummm. You may have something there. I was on short final one day in a LR 35 that had a lightning strike previously. All at once almost all the red and yellow panel lights lit up. My co-captain picked up the checklist, but didn’t know even where to start. He looked at me and said “just land, we’ll figure it out on the ground.” We did. Years later I ran across another crew flying it, and they asked me if we ever had electrical problems. So maybe, black cockpit could certainly been an issue.
If there was an oxygen leak which led to an explosion that would make perfect sense because I worked on Air ambulances. Nurses would complain all the time that the oxygen bottles were leaking and they were right most of the time.
Oxygen would not start a fire. Oxygen would support a fire that was already going. It would take a spark of some kind. I will wait until the NTSB brings out the report with the facts.
the problem is oxygen by itself is not flammable; otherwise our atmosphere would burn.. it makes a great accelerant.. anything catches fire though.. . it does burn EXCESSIVELY.
It could very likely cause a flash fire if it was at a high enough concentration! Best bet is to be patient and let the crash investigators do their job.
This guy has no idea what he’s talking about! “The plane nearly stopped and nosed over.” There is no data or footage that says anything like this. He’s seriously watching the video of it coming down head-on and thinks that when it crosses left-to-right that it’s stopping??! And to say he “saw an explosion” in the footage as well?! So the lights of the plane coming out of 400 ft. overcast is obviously an explosion apparently smh. Ridiculous. Why are they interviewing this guy?!
I agree! I have seen no footage of anything even remotely resembling an explosion on board this aircraft. My opinion, is a sabotage of this aircraft by remote control, possibly inducing spatial disorientation in one or both pilots.
The pilot got into the low clouds and became disoriented and/or lost situational awareness and was unable to regain control before flying into the ground. Those Learjets are high performance aircraft and at low altitude there is no time for recovery. That plane was only around 1200 feet high and traveling at 250 knots, or approx. 400 feet per second.
We do, look up the Aviation Safety Network. It tracks all aircraft accidents and incidents. A majority of them just don’t get reported by mainstream news. Pilots go through a lot of training to prevent making these mistakes, but with the thousands of flights every single day, you’re gonna hear about these simple yet fatal mistakes happening from time to time
Agree with the explosion angle. There was an oxygen fire on an ambulance in Honolulu in 2022 that killed the patient and severely injured the paramedic.
I just read about it. Yes there was an o2 leak. However they were unable to determine what the ignition source was and they were unable to determine a fuel source. O2 does not burn, it merely makes things burn faster.
A fire aft wouldn't immediately incapacitate the crew. And it strongly appears they were in a high-G attempted pullout all the way to the ground, suggesting they were fighting with the controls until impact.
Errrr this isnt ever comparable to that Hawaii incident even if... (Pardon the pun..Ex..plane how an oxygen tank would cause a Lear jet to crash at full throttle like a missle? Unlike the Hawaii episode yer jabbering about
From a former CRJ pilot - I disagree that it was an explosion. Due to low ceilings, the "fire" was possibly aircraft lights. Plus, their gentle left after take off is dispositive to an emergency, or loss of control. Making a left turn, yet told right, is an indication of spatial disorientation.
They were in the soup/IMC - rather than turn right on course to 290 after take off from RW 24, they started a left turn. RIP.
@@GTMemes2 Not making a direct comparison between the ambulance fire and the airplane crash. I was just making a point that medical oxygen can cause a fire and an explosion. Also, a portable O2 bottle can become a missile if the neck break off. I've actually seen that. Not saying that's what happened. Keep working on your spelling, grammar and punctuation.
Did you know US-registered aircraft operate regularly in other countries without adhering rigidly to each country's maintenance standards? An operator adheres to the standards held by the authority which holds their operating certificate.
No ice. Could be fuel related issues. Mechanical failure and/or poor maintenance issues. Remember the TWA 800 747 out of New York in 1996 that exploded (fuel tank and exposed wiring design).
@@aafjeyakubu5124 I do, and OUR standards are higher than theirs. This is the 2nd crash from this Mexican run company with this type of plane. The other was in Mexico.
I thought the footage made it look as if it the Lear Jet had bright flash of light coming from within as it plunged down . My 1st thought was "Oh sh***t that was an internal explosion!"
That's my thought. It looked like it was on fire. The fact that it just basically stopped and fell to the Earth at 11,000 feet per minute. I don't by the spatial disorientation. Less than a minute after takeoff? There's also a co-pilot so did he get it at the same time? I still something exploded.
Juan is an active airline pilot, if he's on a trip he wouldn't be available. In a day or two when he is back on the ground he will brief us all on the Philly and DC incidents. So chill-out and wait for our expert. To hell with Fox and all the other bubble-heads.
That sucker didn't fall to the ground it rocketed to the ground. It's certainly possible there was some explosion like an O2 bottle that wrecked the elevator controls, but I really think that at least one engine was full throttle.
@@Dan-q6v1v Some experts. Said that model aircraft. Has fuel bladders. In the front. If anything from the engine malfunction… would have created the problem! The other is the oxygen tanks?.. the Black box.. well tell…sad day.
The black hawk was in a visual training excercise, not using instruments. It made a bee line into the airplane. Air Traffic control can't prevent that. 🤷🏾♂️
Was a woman "chief-pilotting" the hawk? Just wondering because the LIE that a woman can do all (what) a man can do easily & accurately well, is causing much damage, but it's being swept under the carpet. Many top tasks or jobs that only men should do because they're naturally physically, & mentally built for them, are under threat because political correctness & diversity allows women to be included, consequently, standards & quality are sadly compromised & diluted....because these positions are not women's natural habitats. The military, the air force, the army, the POTUS, or any security roles, are NOT & SHOULD NOT be for women. They'll slow down the army/train. Look at some of them on UA-cam flaunting, & sexualising their body parts in lipstick & in butt-tight uniforms, in suggestive & sensual poses....so disgraceful & unprofessional & a sign of weakness & corruption to that country.
This guy is an ambulance chaser!!! He is the reason we all pay extra for insurance. Totally clueless. Fox, interview a real pilot like Juan Browne in the Blancolirio
Has any of these people that are saying this man doesn't know what he's talking about watched the video and questioned why the plane fell to earth as a fireball.
Why WOULD the jet company say something was wrong with the plane? Company: “uh, yeah there’s something off with the plane, probably shouldn’t fly it..”
@ Thanks you. 17K hours (10K airline) over 40 years, ATP with 2 type ratings, FAA, JCAB, EASA certified instructor, A&P mechanic, ALPA accident investigation.
Occam's Razor people... "the simplest explanation is usually the best. 1. Medical flight 2. Oxygen on board 3. Flaming fireball falling out of the sky. Figure it out.
ATC informed the helicopter TWICE that there was a plane in front of them. TWICE the helicopter acknowledged they had the plane in sight, and requested 'visual separation' ... which simply meant that they would avoid it. This guy is a MORON if he believes ATC was responsible for the DC crash.
The ATC tower was understaffed as one of the controllers was allowed to leave early, when that individual should have been there; ATC will have some culpability in this when it’s all said and done.
@@Zapattack321 What would the tower have done differently if they were fully staffed? Warned them THREE times there was a plane in their path? If you have not heard it, go listen to the tower recording. The warned them the first time when they were probably 2-3 miles out. PAT25 (the helo) acknowledged the plane, and requested "visual separation". That literally means " I see it. I will fly around it". The tower AGAIN warned them roughly 10-15 seconds before the collision, and EVEN told them to "go behind". They literally TOLD them where to fly. And the last transmission from the chopper was once again "Request Visual Separation", for the SECOND time. This accident is 100% the fault of helicopter pilots.
@@RepentfollowJesus There was another plane about a half mile behind the one they hit. The assumption is that they were looking at (fixated on) that plane.
Juan is an active airline pilot, if he's on a trip he wouldn't be available. In a day or two when he is back on the ground he will brief us all on the Philly and DC incidents. So chill-out and wait for our expert. To hell with Fox and all the other bobble-heads.
According to the best source on the net, Juan Browne/Blancolireo, there was no on board fire. Looks like a blazing plane to me, but it's just the landing lights coming through the muck, ceiling was 400-600 AGL. Going to be a tough one to figure out, not much left.
Best post crash analysis channel out there by far. Main stream media has absolutely no clue what they’re talking about and are capitalizing on the deaths of innocent people.
Agree, looks just like the visual effect of landing lights breaking out of the cloud ceiling. But I can also understand how it might look like fire to a casual observer unfamiliar with the effect.
Seems to me, when it started nosing down, from a few of the videos, it started to screech, as if it was going as fast as it can (911 they revved the engines to max before they hit). Also it started to spin or tumble as if the wings had come off, then the explosion occurred. It looked like a missile not a plane. Hopefully they will investigate histories of everyone on board.
😂... because an on fire projectile doesn't make noise. But you, you can say both engines are functioning through the explosion in the air and at the impact. 😂 👌
This is called a 24 hour news cycle.. meaning any "OMG can you believe it" will be met with a yes, why not? Bad things happen every millisecond.. such is life.
@@lenaadams786 The high-pitch whine of a small turbine in unmistakable with aerodynamic noise. At least one engine was clearly operational, probably at close to takeoff power.
I believe it did explode before heading to the ground, it looked like it did with a flash in the sky. Seemed on fire too. May God be with those who have lost loved ones and those injured and passed on the ground. Prayers for all. Peace!
Yea good point I saw that and before it hit the ground the sky lit up orange . This has to be one of worst things I ever seen and a lot of people are going to struggle with PTSD the human brain isn’t made for this type of horrors etc
@@Sergei__v On day one, President Diaper Don promised to tackle inflation-his one big mandate. Instead, egg prices are still soaring, and now we’re dealing with planes falling out of the sky. How’s the weather in Moscow Sergei?
Blancolirio explains what the light was on his UA-cam. probably does the best job of explaining these accidents what they’re looking for etc. no nonsense
The Washingtron crash, I would say the Helicopper pilot was clearly in the wrong and some people are saying the wrong height for what they were meant to be doing and they are also saying the crew lost sight of the plane, likely mistaking it for another plane. The Philly crash, something happened onboard the plane, to cause it to nose dive like a brick into the ground killing everyone onboard as it appeared to be extremely rapid and not sprialling out of control!
The engines were reported to be screaming at full throttle at impact. People heard the engines before the explosion and on the video you can hear the acceleration
Seeing the fire ball coming down, I believe there was an explosion inside the plane and that all on board were killed before they hit the ground. Such a tragic event.
It did not explode in the air. It exploded on impact. The lights seen in the air are the lights from the plane, not an explosion. The experts have all weighed in on this.
An in-flight explosion is a definite possibility. But multiple views show the plane was pulling hard Gs before impact, suggesting the pilots had some elevator control. This is more consistent with spatial disorientation, runaway trim or yaw damper malfunction imo.
I don’t see flames when the plane is comi g down I see landing lights, no sign of flame. The data does not show a stall at any point. The plane was well above stall speed throughout the duration of the flight. This guy is giving out bad info.
@@jordanhenshaw Yeah, in a fully loaded 747-400. Not a chance in a Lear 55. Even if there was a catastrophic load shift, you have strong laminar flow for days. That plane would have shot up another 1,000 feet in the air if there was any input close to stalling a Lear 55 wing at 210kts airspeed imo. You also would have necessarily seen a dramatic groundspeed drop prior to commencement of the dive.
It looks like fire to me. It’s not just a light, it’s rolling light of different tones, at different heights at times, like in fire. It was foggy, but I don’t think that would account for making landing lights look like fire.
@@helix1061 Yep we’re talking about boxes and boxes of highly classified U.S. secrets stored at Mar-a-Lago, open to the public bathroom, until the FBI did their job and raided the place. Now President Diaper Don wants to fire them for doing their duty. He’s setting himself up for a major loss in court over this.
This guy does not know what he’s talking about. It’s much more likely the crew suffered spatial disorientation. The ceiling was 400’ AGL, so in a Lear 55 they were off the runway only a few seconds before going IMC. For a fact based analysis watch the Blancolirio video. Juan has all the ADSB data and looks at the crash without resorting to pure conjecture.
@@watchgoose No. Oxygen tanks don't just magically start fires or explode. And even if one tank was leaking, causing an oxygen rich environment, there won't be a massive fire.
No mayday, not call of emergency , just plummets to ground. Leaves only a few options which apply. Those are most likely incident renders pilot crew incapacitated or pilot crew intentionally flew plane into ground.
@@rangersmith4652 The first reports on the 31. Fox had videos that showed the explosion!! From rings security cameras!!. A BIG EXPLOSION!! Plainly visible…the reporter was there at the time.. way?..
Through the clouds, I saw landing lights, not fire. On the same door camera video also heard one if not both engines running at high throttle. This is not going to be a quick investigation. I hope the cause is determined in spite of little to no evidence that survived the impact site. Prayers to all.
There was no in flight explosion with exception of the black hawk hitting the AA jet. The other had no explosion, it was a take off stall, then a nose dive on the other med evac.
This is credible reporting. It's the only answer that checks all the boxes. An inflight explosion that incapacitated the pilot / copilot and also pushed their bodies forward onto the control yoke. That makes sense because at this point in the flight and with the existing weather, highest likelihood is that the pilot was hand-flying the plane versus using the autopilot. That would explain the near vertical dive attitude.
Where did you see an in air explosion? Egines were running when it hit the ground.. the ring camera where the guy and lady walk out the door.. there is sound to that video you can hear the engines clearly..
@@JenniferCassell-m5b landing lights. Think headlights with high beams in fog. It glows. The jet flew out of the clouds (the same stuff that fog is made of) so it appeared to glow
Dude, look at all the videos. The plane is intact and not on fire. Looks like spatial disorientated in IMC. There were five controllers, two were local. Do you have to take a loyalty pledge to work for Fox?
My my…so many so call experts here giving their observations and being harsh on other people’s opinions. To each its own opinion and let’s be respectful
Well that's just not the internet way mate🤣. People that would normally be very respectful when in front of people cause they are scared of getting smacked in the chops get on here and become arse holes due to the protection of the keyboard. It sucks and shouldn't be that way but unfortunately it is 👍🍻🇭🇲
Something happened suddenly to incapacitate the pilot and/or possibly the others. Even if this was spacial disorientation as suggested, why didn’t we hear from the pilot even in the last moments?
Blancolirio channel has much better analysis. It is the opposite of what this guy is pushing. Not on fire or exploding in the air. Both engines still firing. Not only accelerating, but out of the pilots control.. due to disorientation.
Another report states contact with terrain but spatial disorientation is the evolving theory. There was no explosion, it's the landing lights you see in the video.
Sorry. This “expert” is clueless. ADSB data shows a pretty clear case of spatial disorientation. Oxygen is not “extremely flammable.” That’s just silly. Oxygen is merely an oxidizer. If oxygen was flammable then its hazmat placard would indicate so, and it doesn’t.
He really is. As you mention, Oxygen doesn't burn. It reacts with things that burn. Also, the plane didn't stop mid-air and drop. That would be impossible. It nosed over into the ground, indicating that the pilots either completely lost control or were dead.
@@pilatus421 Other experts are saying it suffered a loss of lift on the left wing, nosed over and dropped like a rock. Nobody is saying an explosion but this is fox and they like their sensational stories without basis in facts.
I was actually wondering if an oxygen tank exploded..I mean knowing what was on board, seeing the fireball torpedo into the ground like a missile. Seems a little different from the other crashes.
Oxygen is consumed but there has to be a lot of something able to be oxidized rapidly there for the oxygen to be consumed. Flame is just quicker oxidization than rust is.
Explosion on the ground was jet fuel mixing with the oxygen. O2 on it's own doesn't explode. It provides the oxygen needed for OTHER chemicals to burn.
No. Oxygen tanks don't just magically start fires or explode. And even if one tank was leaking, causing an oxygen rich environment, there won't be a massive fire.
My money is on the fact that Philly airplane accident is not just an accident. The other airplane helicopter collision I disagree with the gentlemen speaking poorly of a controller person. The best analysis in my opinion so far was a review by Captain Steeeve channel, a pilot.. he puts it in the easy to understand perspective. But both are tragedies for sure. So sad.
You could CLEARLY see the plane on fire coming down in one of the recordings they have. Also, there was an explosion in the sky right before the plane hit the ground.
This guy is CLUELESS. There was no in-flight explosion whatsoever. This was almost certainly a loss of control due to spatial disorientation. Smarten up!
Were you there? The plane was on fire on the way down. You can clearly see it, like a comet or missile. It makes sense that an oxygen tank exploded, causing the literal drop from the sky.
@sonofhibbs4425 It wasn’t on fire. I love how everyone is watching a bunch of grainy low res video of a fast moving plane in fog and thinking they’re seeing fire somehow. You people are IDIOTS.
There are unconfirmed reports of debris falling off before crash, so we just have to wait. NTSB had not heard that report and promised to comment tomorrow.
Oh really? Trump's first mass firing was on Thursday..And it was at the FBI.. Other federal employees he demanded they come back out to work ( most work at home) or be fired.. I don't think FAA employees were EVER allowed to work from home.. COPE HARDER..
@danechristmas6570 Trump & his administration fired several federal employees including TSA & FAA agents. TWO plane crashes in ONE week, 75 people dead. Deal with it MAGA.😂
Speculation for sure but it’s nice to see Fox find actual experts. As a pilot, pressurized aircraft have oxygen on board and engines are typically where fires happen on aircraft. But a catastrophic explosion… terrifying
Bottles of oxygen are not a bomb son. Oxygen is not flammable. Oxygen is necessary for combustion son. So unless they had an open flame close t on flammable material your conspiracy theory is nonsense son
Being an Air Traffic Controller is one of the most nerve racking jobs anyone can ever have
It is, and my friend is one and literally a couple weeks before all this, she seemed more stressed with all the DEI BS. Which I found very interesting that Trump immediately called them out, makes me wonder what’s really going on in those towers.
It is certainly a job I could never do.
"A thing happens.. we overreact.. and it is always a win for us somehow"
@@cherieree Probably orgies.
I went to A&P school with a recently fired ATC man (Regan fired them all when they went on strike) and he said getting fired was the best thing that ever happened to him. He'd been having multiple health issues that all went away after losing his job. That kind of stress is not good for you...and being understaffed makes a difficult job even worse.
You can clearly hear that at least one engine was operating at near full speed when it hit the ground.
Yup, I agree. Heard it on a video.
I thought I heard that. Actually I didn't know.
Drone strike?
Egg prices are soaring and now Planes are exploding from the sky. FDJT 🇺🇸
@@joesmith4443I knew some idiot would blame Trump for this Lear jet explosion. And egg prices went up because Biden forced farms to slaughter 100 million chickens last year. FJB
It is doubtful that the engines stopped on the LearJet. ADS-B radar data, which uses inputs from the plane's avionics systems indicated that the aircraft was over 200 knots most of the time. Furthermore, with an overcast ceiling of between 400 and 600 feet no one could have seen the airplane 'stop in mid air.' It climbed to about 1,600' or so, and then at some point, nosed over. It was travelling at over 11,000' per minute on it's final radar data. If the ceiling was overcast to 600', it would have been only seen for three or four seconds max. This is proven in the door cam video were we seen the aircraft appear out of the clouds and impact the ground within a few seconds. Also, audio for that video appears to indicate that the engines were both developing full power.
So, anyone would be hard pressed to convince me that the engines had failed on the aircraft.
One of the most plausible things I have heard so far is 'spatial disorientation' where the pilot, once entering the clouds loses his reference to the ground. Having experienced this personally, I know how important it is to get on the instruments. But, I even have issues with this. Both pilots would need to have this happen to them at the same time, and that is unlikely. What I would believe more would be a catastrophic avionics failure. I don't know if '-UCI' had analog gauges or EFIS gauges, but a failure of a specific electrical buss or multiple busses might have caused the Attitude Indicators to trip offline, and in the clouds, that's the absolute worst place for it to happen.
Was there an explosion on the aircraft? We don't know. Tower cleared them to take off on runway 24 and then turn right to a heading of 290, or a 50º turn. Radar data indicated they began the turn as they were climbing, but didn't get very far into the turn and then the aircraft started back to the left and started descending. We don't know the details, we may never know the details.
It's obvious that the plane was on fire prior to impact.
What was the source of the fire?
Engine exceeded fan surge margin from ingesting rain is the most likely explanation.
@@GaryMCurran , hummm. You may have something there. I was on short final one day in a LR 35 that had a lightning strike previously. All at once almost all the red and yellow panel lights lit up. My co-captain picked up the checklist, but didn’t know even where to start. He looked at me and said “just land, we’ll figure it out on the ground.” We did. Years later I ran across another crew flying it, and they asked me if we ever had electrical problems. So maybe, black cockpit could certainly been an issue.
@@curtischilders3024obvious? I haven’t seen anything that indicates it was on fire
Sounds very plausible, thank you.
Lol, so you're saying the pilots didn't realize the nose was vertically pointing at the ground?
A video posted last night, you couldn't see the crash, but you could hear at least one engine under power before the explosion
If there was an oxygen leak which led to an explosion that would make perfect sense because I worked on Air ambulances. Nurses would complain all the time that the oxygen bottles were leaking and they were right most of the time.
Oxygen would not start a fire. Oxygen would support a fire that was already going. It would take a spark of some kind. I will wait until the NTSB brings out the report with the facts.
I honestly don’t understand where you fools come up with this pure nonsense.
@ FAA safety training is where we come up with this pure nonsense. lol. 😂
No sign of explosion on board.
Don't feed the trolls = "Never argue with stupid people. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience". -Mark Twain
the problem is oxygen by itself is not flammable; otherwise our atmosphere would burn.. it makes a great accelerant.. anything catches fire though.. . it does burn EXCESSIVELY.
The tanks have concentrated oxygen. Our air has other things as well.
TRUE DAT!!!
It could very likely cause a flash fire if it was at a high enough concentration!
Best bet is to be patient and let the crash investigators do their job.
How can they say there was nothing wrong with the plane? It’s way too early to speculate that!
zip it nicky
@ zip it? Who the F%@k are you? Do you find something offensive about my opinion?? Take a hike!
@ looser!
@@LizDarrow-Bellingham
Having a bad day Lizzy?
This guy has no idea what he’s talking about! “The plane nearly stopped and nosed over.” There is no data or footage that says anything like this. He’s seriously watching the video of it coming down head-on and thinks that when it crosses left-to-right that it’s stopping??! And to say he “saw an explosion” in the footage as well?! So the lights of the plane coming out of 400 ft. overcast is obviously an explosion apparently smh. Ridiculous. Why are they interviewing this guy?!
I agree! I have seen no footage of anything even remotely resembling an explosion on board this aircraft.
My opinion, is a sabotage of this aircraft by remote control, possibly inducing spatial disorientation in one or both pilots.
They use this guy all the time. Speculation does no one any good.
Yeah, I believe it never went below about 210kts indicated airspeed.
The pilot got into the low clouds and became disoriented and/or lost situational awareness and was unable to regain control before flying into the ground. Those Learjets are high performance aircraft and at low altitude there is no time for recovery. That plane was only around 1200 feet high and traveling at 250 knots, or approx. 400 feet per second.
well said fake news
Fox News please quit using this guy for aviation related pieces. He’s an uninformed clown.
why would you say that? because he blames Mexico?
If these accidents were nothing but slight simple mistake then we should be having plane crashes all the time
We do, look up the Aviation Safety Network. It tracks all aircraft accidents and incidents. A majority of them just don’t get reported by mainstream news.
Pilots go through a lot of training to prevent making these mistakes, but with the thousands of flights every single day, you’re gonna hear about these simple yet fatal mistakes happening from time to time
Agree with the explosion angle. There was an oxygen fire on an ambulance in Honolulu in 2022 that killed the patient and severely injured the paramedic.
I just read about it. Yes there was an o2 leak. However they were unable to determine what the ignition source was and they were unable to determine a fuel source. O2 does not burn, it merely makes things burn faster.
A fire aft wouldn't immediately incapacitate the crew. And it strongly appears they were in a high-G attempted pullout all the way to the ground, suggesting they were fighting with the controls until impact.
Errrr this isnt ever comparable to that Hawaii incident even if...
(Pardon the pun..Ex..plane how an oxygen tank would cause a Lear jet to crash at full throttle like a missle?
Unlike the Hawaii episode yer jabbering about
From a former CRJ pilot
- I disagree that it was an explosion.
Due to low ceilings, the "fire" was possibly aircraft lights.
Plus,
their gentle left after take off is dispositive to an emergency, or loss of control.
Making a left turn, yet told right, is an indication of spatial disorientation.
They were in the soup/IMC
- rather than turn right on course to 290 after take off from RW 24, they started a left turn.
RIP.
@@GTMemes2 Not making a direct comparison between the ambulance fire and the airplane crash. I was just making a point that medical oxygen can cause a fire and an explosion. Also, a portable O2 bottle can become a missile if the neck break off. I've actually seen that. Not saying that's what happened. Keep working on your spelling, grammar and punctuation.
Why is a Mexican plane that’s maintained by Mexico operating with this kind of regularity in the US without following the US maintenance standards?
Exactly my thoughts !
Did you know US-registered aircraft operate regularly in other countries without adhering rigidly to each country's maintenance standards? An operator adheres to the standards held by the authority which holds their operating certificate.
Ask Biden.
No ice. Could be fuel related issues. Mechanical failure and/or poor maintenance issues. Remember the TWA 800 747 out of New York in 1996 that exploded (fuel tank and exposed wiring design).
@@aafjeyakubu5124 I do, and OUR standards are higher than theirs. This is the 2nd crash from this Mexican run company with this type of plane. The other was in Mexico.
Why isn’t anyone talking about possible sabotage? An explosion mid-air seems too coincidental to just be a mechanical failure!
Come on man the simplest thing is usually the answer
Or a drone strike
An explosion in mid air seems too coincidental to not be an oxygen tank explosion.
I thought the footage made it look as if it the Lear Jet had bright flash of light coming from within as it plunged down . My 1st thought was "Oh sh***t that was an internal explosion!"
That's my thought. It looked like it was on fire. The fact that it just basically stopped and fell to the Earth at 11,000 feet per minute. I don't by the spatial disorientation. Less than a minute after takeoff? There's also a co-pilot so did he get it at the same time? I still something exploded.
@@venusdistorted5170 oxygen canister.
Where do you get these “experts”??? Guy has no clue. Blancolirio or bust!!!
hey we need air time. get the janitor, hes been on a plane and get him a tie.
Juan is an active airline pilot, if he's on a trip he wouldn't be available.
In a day or two when he is back on the ground he will brief us all on the Philly and DC incidents.
So chill-out and wait for our expert. To hell with Fox and all the other bubble-heads.
That sucker didn't fall to the ground it rocketed to the ground. It's certainly possible there was some explosion like an O2 bottle that wrecked the elevator controls, but I really think that at least one engine was full throttle.
Thete were oxygen canisters found a quarter mile away from the wreckage...
What ignited the Ox in the cabin?
Ladies and gentlemen we have homegrown terrorists who know how to bring planes down and do all sorts of things this is going to continue to happen
@@Dan-q6v1v
Some experts. Said that model aircraft. Has fuel bladders. In the front. If anything from the engine malfunction… would have created the problem! The other is the oxygen tanks?.. the Black box.. well tell…sad day.
MY SENTIMENTS EXACTLY!! 🔥 IWAS THINKING THE EXACT SAME THING!
The black hawk was in a visual training excercise, not using instruments. It made a bee line into the airplane. Air Traffic control can't prevent that. 🤷🏾♂️
Was a woman "chief-pilotting" the hawk? Just wondering because the LIE that a woman can do all (what) a man can do easily & accurately well, is causing much damage, but it's being swept under the carpet. Many top tasks or jobs that only men should do because they're naturally physically, & mentally built for them, are under threat because political correctness & diversity allows women to be included, consequently, standards & quality are sadly compromised & diluted....because these positions are not women's natural habitats. The military, the air force, the army, the POTUS, or any security roles, are NOT & SHOULD NOT be for women. They'll slow down the army/train. Look at some of them on UA-cam flaunting, & sexualising their body parts in lipstick & in butt-tight uniforms, in suggestive & sensual poses....so disgraceful & unprofessional & a sign of weakness & corruption to that country.
I thought this video was about the Learjet crash
@@tonyclifton8102 Watch the entire video.
@@GranFinale would it not be the ATC to DIRECT air traffic?? 100 % it’s there job!
Oxygen!! Medical oxygen.
Don't all planes have oxygen to compensate for the thinning air outside as the plane climbs?
@@88KeysIdaho NO...
This guy is an ambulance chaser!!! He is the reason we all pay extra for insurance. Totally clueless. Fox, interview a real pilot like Juan Browne in the Blancolirio
Juan Browne went over nixing the explosion / fire before crash theory. The light was from the aircraft nav / landing lights.
Has any of these people that are saying this man doesn't know what he's talking about watched the video and questioned why the plane fell to earth as a fireball.
Footage shows fire, then a “boom” [oxygen canister explosion].
There was data registered all the way to the ground. Landing lights were visible. No sign of fire. Guy doesn't know.
Why WOULD the jet company say something was wrong with the plane?
Company: “uh, yeah there’s something off with the plane, probably shouldn’t fly it..”
Leave it to Fox to find a totally ignorant former pilot.
They shoulda got you!
Do tell what is your resume? Do you have a pilot license and if so what are your ratings?
@ Thanks you. 17K hours (10K airline) over 40 years, ATP with 2 type ratings, FAA, JCAB, EASA certified instructor, A&P mechanic, ALPA accident investigation.
Maybe it was an oxygen tank
"compressed air can be extremely flammable"... Fox News you need to take this guy's name out of your Roladex.
Medical grade O2 is nothing like compressed air. You can thank your teacher for that not so smart remark. Research O2 and oil, or O2 and iron.
Occam's Razor people... "the simplest explanation is usually the best.
1. Medical flight
2. Oxygen on board
3. Flaming fireball falling out of the sky.
Figure it out.
They can't. They don't have the ability to think things through logically.
ATC informed the helicopter TWICE that there was a plane in front of them. TWICE the helicopter acknowledged they had the plane in sight, and requested 'visual separation' ... which simply meant that they would avoid it. This guy is a MORON if he believes ATC was responsible for the DC crash.
The ATC tower was understaffed as one of the controllers was allowed to leave early, when that individual should have been there; ATC will have some culpability in this when it’s all said and done.
The helo saw an aircraft near them but not the one atc was warning about.
@@Zapattack321 What would the tower have done differently if they were fully staffed? Warned them THREE times there was a plane in their path?
If you have not heard it, go listen to the tower recording. The warned them the first time when they were probably 2-3 miles out. PAT25 (the helo) acknowledged the plane, and requested "visual separation". That literally means " I see it. I will fly around it".
The tower AGAIN warned them roughly 10-15 seconds before the collision, and EVEN told them to "go behind". They literally TOLD them where to fly. And the last transmission from the chopper was once again "Request Visual Separation", for the SECOND time.
This accident is 100% the fault of helicopter pilots.
The plane was 150 feet above the helicopters' height. How also could they not see a huge plane right in front of them??
@@RepentfollowJesus There was another plane about a half mile behind the one they hit. The assumption is that they were looking at (fixated on) that plane.
Juan is an active airline pilot, if he's on a trip he wouldn't be available.
In a day or two when he is back on the ground he will brief us all on the Philly and DC incidents.
So chill-out and wait for our expert. To hell with Fox and all the other bobble-heads.
According to the best source on the net, Juan Browne/Blancolireo, there was no on board fire. Looks like a blazing plane to me, but it's just the landing lights coming through the muck, ceiling was 400-600 AGL. Going to be a tough one to figure out, not much left.
Best post crash analysis channel out there by far. Main stream media has absolutely no clue what they’re talking about and are capitalizing on the deaths of innocent people.
Agree, looks just like the visual effect of landing lights breaking out of the cloud ceiling.
But I can also understand how it might look like fire to a casual observer unfamiliar with the effect.
Seems to me, when it started nosing down, from a few of the videos, it started to screech, as if it was going as fast as it can (911 they revved the engines to max before they hit). Also it started to spin or tumble as if the wings had come off, then the explosion occurred. It looked like a missile not a plane. Hopefully they will investigate histories of everyone on board.
Plus cheap, fixed lens doorbell cameras.
It wouldn't have landing lights on after takeoff.
As far as oxygen tanks leaking....all you need is an exposed electrical wire.
Not exposed. But a spark, Duhh.
A few seconds of pure hell. God Almighty! RIP
Oxygen is not flammable.
Oxygen is not flammable but will make any fuel sorse
Did either of these experts actually watch these videos? You can clearly hear at least one if not, both engines are running prior to impact.
😂... because an on fire projectile doesn't make noise. But you, you can say both engines are functioning through the explosion in the air and at the impact. 😂 👌
This is called a 24 hour news cycle.. meaning any "OMG can you believe it" will be met with a yes, why not? Bad things happen every millisecond.. such is life.
@@lenaadams786 The high-pitch whine of a small turbine in unmistakable with aerodynamic noise. At least one engine was clearly operational, probably at close to takeoff power.
It sounded like a plane trying to take off . Like in the 70s when travel was often done in a DC 10.
I believe it did explode before heading to the ground, it looked like it did with a flash in the sky. Seemed on fire too. May God be with those who have lost loved ones and those injured and passed on the ground. Prayers for all. Peace!
Landing lights glaring off the clouds.
Ikr Planes are exploding in the sky, Egg prices are soaring all under a False prophet President Diaper Don FDJT 🇺🇸 🙏🏻
Yea good point I saw that and before it hit the ground the sky lit up orange . This has to be one of worst things I ever seen and a lot of people are going to struggle with PTSD the human brain isn’t made for this type of horrors etc
It didn’t explode in the air. You people are CLUELESS.
The Philly crash looks like a classic case of spatial disorientation.
Yep and Egg prices are skyrocketing thanks President Diaper Don for lying it will solved on a Day One 🤥
That's the evolving theory.
@@joesmith4443what a silly statement. Now show us where Trump said anything like this. TDS much?
@@Sergei__v On day one, President Diaper Don promised to tackle inflation-his one big mandate. Instead, egg prices are still soaring, and now we’re dealing with planes falling out of the sky. How’s the weather in Moscow Sergei?
@@joesmith4443 Go back to felching Hunter…
Two crashes in one week is a bit much.🤕
Another expert said that both engines had to be at full speed going down
Blancolirio explains what the light was on his UA-cam. probably does the best job of explaining these accidents what they’re looking for etc. no nonsense
The Washingtron crash, I would say the Helicopper pilot was clearly in the wrong and some people are saying the wrong height for what they were meant to be doing and they are also saying the crew lost sight of the plane, likely mistaking it for another plane. The Philly crash, something happened onboard the plane, to cause it to nose dive like a brick into the ground killing everyone onboard as it appeared to be extremely rapid and not sprialling out of control!
This is the most plausible explanation
My heart goes out to these very specific families.. that we are all watching.. get spammed and made a spectacle of.. for the kiddo's.
The engines were reported to be screaming at full throttle at impact.
People heard the engines before the explosion and on the video you can hear the acceleration
the medical transport jet had O2 bottles in it also.
Looks so to me, because that explosion on impact was huge!
Oxygen by itself is not flammable 😂It only accelerates fire/explosion!
Hospitals have always had signs ( especially back when it was legal to smoke in the hospital) which said No Smoking Oxygen in Use. It is concentrated.
DRONE Collision???
It was a medical flight i wouldnt be surprised if it was caused by medical equipment malfunction
It was anything but hitting a drone. Got it.
It's in part about regurgitating videos to keeping the money coming in from UA-cam
Seeing the fire ball coming down, I believe there was an explosion inside the plane and that all on board were killed before they hit the ground. Such a tragic event.
Are we holding Mexico accountable for the damages?
They will ignore claims. As usual..
The plane was inspected in Philly before it took off.
Per leftist logic that guns shoot by themselves, so, are democraps going to protest bans against planes for this mass plane killing of 7?
Spatial disorientation.
Exploding cell phones in the engine compartment maybe!??😳🛩️
I bet its an ADI failure, no radio call would suggest they never knew anything was wrong
It did not explode in the air. It exploded on impact. The lights seen in the air are the lights from the plane, not an explosion. The experts have all weighed in on this.
it was on fire coming down fam. at least thats what one of the videos showed
Well, it appeared to be on fire before the explosion on impact, on the ground? God knows exactly what happened & if there's more to it.
@@JohhnMontgomery no fire. lights from the plane
An in-flight explosion is a definite possibility. But multiple views show the plane was pulling hard Gs before impact, suggesting the pilots had some elevator control. This is more consistent with spatial disorientation, runaway trim or yaw damper malfunction imo.
I don’t see flames when the plane is comi g down I see landing lights, no sign of flame. The data does not show a stall at any point. The plane was well above stall speed throughout the duration of the flight. This guy is giving out bad info.
Flight profile is a classic stall. Cog too far aft may have contributed.
@@jordanhenshaw Yeah, in a fully loaded 747-400. Not a chance in a Lear 55. Even if there was a catastrophic load shift, you have strong laminar flow for days. That plane would have shot up another 1,000 feet in the air if there was any input close to stalling a Lear 55 wing at 210kts airspeed imo. You also would have necessarily seen a dramatic groundspeed drop prior to commencement of the dive.
landing lights?? it looked like a missile . I have no idea what video you saw
It looks like fire to me. It’s not just a light, it’s rolling light of different tones, at different heights at times, like in fire. It was foggy, but I don’t think that would account for making landing lights look like fire.
@@josephpa05flames are orange. All I see is white light. Landing/ navigation lights moving very fast obviously.
Oxygen is "not explosive", as it's "not flammable". It ALLOWS other materials to "oxidize" or "burn".
Horribly sad!!!😢
Agreed. I think it was an oxygen tank explosion on board. It already appeared to be on fire before it hit the ground.
The black boxes should have a lot of detailed information?
Beep beep beep... Hey, I am over here. When the boxes get wet, they start beeping so they can be found on the floor of the ocean.
@@helix1061 Yep we’re talking about boxes and boxes of highly classified U.S. secrets stored at Mar-a-Lago, open to the public bathroom, until the FBI did their job and raided the place. Now President Diaper Don wants to fire them for doing their duty. He’s setting himself up for a major loss in court over this.
Did they get the black box? Looks too violent for anything to survive even the black box.
Plane of this age didnt have them.
blaming the air controller when it has been known shortage with air traffic controllers. Understaffed. one traffic controller has limitations
This guy does not know what he’s talking about. It’s much more likely the crew suffered spatial disorientation. The ceiling was 400’ AGL, so in a Lear 55 they were off the runway only a few seconds before going IMC. For a fact based analysis watch the Blancolirio video. Juan has all the ADSB data and looks at the crash without resorting to pure conjecture.
Juan is a good man but was not thinking about O2 bottles and may not have seen the one I did laying on the ground.
@@watchgoose No. Oxygen tanks don't just magically start fires or explode. And even if one tank was leaking, causing an oxygen rich environment, there won't be a massive fire.
Yep, Juan is my go to source for everything aviation.
Apparently, visuals now show the jet on fire 🔥 before impacting the ground.
Spatial disorentiontation. The landing lights were still on. No explosion
Where is this footage of the aircraft exploding before it nosed over?
Doesn't exist. This guy is a complete tool looking for 15 minutes of fame, but getting 2 minutes of shame instead.
didn't explode before the fire but was ON fire.
@ Yep. Dozens of these supposed experts are chiming in.
No mayday, not call of emergency , just plummets to ground. Leaves only a few options which apply. Those are most likely incident renders pilot crew incapacitated or pilot crew intentionally flew plane into ground.
@@rangersmith4652
The first reports on the 31. Fox had videos that showed the explosion!! From rings security cameras!!. A BIG EXPLOSION!! Plainly visible…the reporter was there at the time.. way?..
Oxygen does not explode. Find another excuse of why there was an explosion.
Concentrated does if there is a tiny spark.
Here's the three culprits that went through my mind immediately, oxygen on board, a stupid poorly trained pilot, a poorly maintained airplane.
as in contaminated fuel
Oxygen doesn’t make planes explode, it’s on even flammable.
Easy clap.. Stop flying places and stay at home.. Don't even leave. You did enough already.. impulsively... for no real reason you can identify.
None of the above! You people are ridiculous!!
@@Johnfisher12345
So what do you think caused the huge fireball on impact?
Either an oxygen tank explosion or an overweight aircraft that stalled
Through the clouds, I saw landing lights, not fire. On the same door camera video also heard one if not both engines running at high throttle. This is not going to be a quick investigation. I hope the cause is determined in spite of little to no evidence that survived the impact site. Prayers to all.
I'm thinking the plane was in full throttle accent and possibly a hydraulic line blew and the flaps dropped...
Not sure we will ever know.
Dan Gyer could figure it out
@@dougjohnson4702 now there seems to be some agreement as to the yaw damper system...
There was no in flight explosion with exception of the black hawk hitting the AA jet. The other had no explosion, it was a take off stall, then a nose dive on the other med evac.
Hello baby how are you cn u share your Instagram?
This is credible reporting. It's the only answer that checks all the boxes. An inflight explosion that incapacitated the pilot / copilot and also pushed their bodies forward onto the control yoke. That makes sense because at this point in the flight and with the existing weather, highest likelihood is that the pilot was hand-flying the plane versus using the autopilot. That would explain the near vertical dive attitude.
Where did you see an in air explosion? Egines were running when it hit the ground.. the ring camera where the guy and lady walk out the door.. there is sound to that video you can hear the engines clearly..
You can see it glow before it actually hit the ground! Only an onboard explosion can cause it to glow like that!
@@JenniferCassell-m5b landing lights. Think headlights with high beams in fog. It glows. The jet flew out of the clouds (the same stuff that fog is made of) so it appeared to glow
They said they found debris in a remote area which may have come from the Lear before the rapid descent and impact to the ground
It looked more like the landing lights breaking out of the cloud deck than an explosion.
So heartbreaking 💔
Dude, look at all the videos. The plane is intact and not on fire. Looks like spatial disorientated in IMC.
There were five controllers, two were local.
Do you have to take a loyalty pledge to work for Fox?
My my…so many so call experts here giving their observations and being harsh on other people’s opinions. To each its own opinion and let’s be respectful
Well that's just not the internet way mate🤣. People that would normally be very respectful when in front of people cause they are scared of getting smacked in the chops get on here and become arse holes due to the protection of the keyboard. It sucks and shouldn't be that way but unfortunately it is 👍🍻🇭🇲
You are so right! Too many bullies with superiority complex and bitterness…poisonous tone and tongue! Gee, I hate that…
That's exactly what I thought from the beginning,,,,a fire or explosion mid flight that sent that plane down....this guy is good 👍
Something happened suddenly to incapacitate the pilot and/or possibly the others. Even if this was spacial disorientation as suggested, why didn’t we hear from the pilot even in the last moments?
What a tragegy & mess!! Sad sad!!
Also that infrared video shows the 2 engines still intact and they are bright white cuz they are the hottest thing in that video
Always assuming! Why not wait for the data? The plane lost lift.
@@Doc5thMech it didn’t seem to be on fire or anything before hitting the ground so ya, I agree, way to early to speculate on anything!
Blancolirio channel has much better analysis. It is the opposite of what this guy is pushing. Not on fire or exploding in the air. Both engines still firing. Not only accelerating, but out of the pilots control.. due to disorientation.
If you want science, rationality, or logic don't come to this channel.
Don't blame Mexico for this plane! We still don't know what happened!
Another report states contact with terrain but spatial disorientation is the evolving theory. There was no explosion, it's the landing lights you see in the video.
Sorry. This “expert” is clueless. ADSB data shows a pretty clear case of spatial disorientation.
Oxygen is not “extremely flammable.” That’s just silly. Oxygen is merely an oxidizer. If oxygen was flammable then its hazmat placard would indicate so, and it doesn’t.
He really is. As you mention, Oxygen doesn't burn. It reacts with things that burn. Also, the plane didn't stop mid-air and drop. That would be impossible. It nosed over into the ground, indicating that the pilots either completely lost control or were dead.
Yeah I don't know where they're getting their experts from but this guy's a moron. This was a clear case of spatial disorientation or loss of control.
@@pilatus421 Other experts are saying it suffered a loss of lift on the left wing, nosed over and dropped like a rock. Nobody is saying an explosion but this is fox and they like their sensational stories without basis in facts.
Atomphere 21% Oxygen.
Oxygen canisters 100% Oxygen.
Oxygen feeds flames.
Who would have ever thought Fox would get many things wrong
Naaa, my money is on Spatial disorientation.
Stop speculating
Ridiculous comment. Grow up.
@@cailancook9720 You first.
@cailancook9720 that's a common sense answer
I'm gonna gather that the possible in-flight explosion probably had something to do with one or all of those oxygen tanks. 🤔
How did you see an explosion? They were in the clouds.
I was actually wondering if an oxygen tank exploded..I mean knowing what was on board, seeing the fireball torpedo into the ground like a missile. Seems a little different from the other crashes.
Wasn't that a particularly large explosion? That's oxygen?
Oxygen is consumed but there has to be a lot of something able to be oxidized rapidly there for the oxygen to be consumed. Flame is just quicker oxidization than rust is.
Explosion on the ground was jet fuel mixing with the oxygen. O2 on it's own doesn't explode. It provides the oxygen needed for OTHER chemicals to burn.
O2 plus jet fuel fumes. When my last house burned, the 02 cylinders I had went off like bombs!
No. Oxygen tanks don't just magically start fires or explode. And even if one tank was leaking, causing an oxygen rich environment, there won't be a massive fire.
Most probable is the stabilizer failed or improper setting.. Second possibility is hitting a drone.
My money is on the fact that Philly airplane accident is not just an accident. The other airplane helicopter collision I disagree with the gentlemen speaking poorly of a controller person. The best analysis in my opinion so far was a review by Captain Steeeve channel, a pilot.. he puts it in the easy to understand perspective. But both are tragedies for sure. So sad.
I said this last night. The plane was obviously on fire before it crashed.
No it wasn’t.
So was Trump's presidency
@@sherlockhomo-ph4su you took the vaccine didn’t you 😅😅😅😅 how do you feel that Biden pardon Fauci?
Night flying drones over Philly? Seen lately by star gazers? May have been cause !
@@bcask61 Go watch the video.
It was stall this guy has no idea what hes talking about
No fire. Look again. Lights from plane. Other angles don’t show fire. Both engines running.
Is it any surprise Fox got something wrong again? I should say most likely got it wrong - odds favor no fire.
Oh I didn't know know you had an eagle eye
You could CLEARLY see the plane on fire coming down in one of the recordings they have. Also, there was an explosion in the sky right before the plane hit the ground.
Too sad, but it Make sense,the helicopter is Mexican’s not American’s
This guy is CLUELESS. There was no in-flight explosion whatsoever. This was almost certainly a loss of control due to spatial disorientation. Smarten up!
Were you there? The plane was on fire on the way down. You can clearly see it, like a comet or missile. It makes sense that an oxygen tank exploded, causing the literal drop from the sky.
@@tanana2070 definitely looked to be on fire. It wasn’t just landing lights.
@tanana2070 🤣🤣🤣🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
@sonofhibbs4425 It wasn’t on fire. I love how everyone is watching a bunch of grainy low res video of a fast moving plane in fog and thinking they’re seeing fire somehow. You people are IDIOTS.
That angle of decent was pretty steep, and the huge explosion on impact... Unreal!
i wish they would put sean hannity on so he can tell us what to think.
😂
You want to get the information from the least qualified person for the issue. I love you MAGA you make me laugh!
😂👍
There are unconfirmed reports of debris falling off before crash, so we just have to wait. NTSB had not heard that report and promised to comment tomorrow.
Lets not forget that donald trump fired hundreds of FAA employees since taking office two weeks ago.
Oh really?
Trump's first mass firing was on Thursday..And it was at the FBI..
Other federal employees he demanded they come back out to work ( most work at home) or be fired..
I don't think FAA employees were EVER allowed to work from home..
COPE HARDER..
@danechristmas6570 Trump & his administration fired several federal employees including TSA & FAA agents. TWO plane crashes in ONE week, 75 people dead. Deal with it MAGA.😂
No relation to someone flying stupid. Like you are. Im a pilot instructor.
@@JavierBrent Sure you are...🤣🤣🤣. He did fire them, there is quite literally ZERO room for any discussion. It happened.
The engine is screaming on the ring cam!
Are these crashes going to start derailing trains, causing them to crash into meat packing plants then starting wildfires?
Donald needs to explain how he uses a cotton candy machine to do his hair every morning.
👍
Speculation for sure but it’s nice to see Fox find actual experts. As a pilot, pressurized aircraft have oxygen on board and engines are typically where fires happen on aircraft. But a catastrophic explosion… terrifying
Bottles of oxygen not properly electrically grounded to the aircraft.
Literally oxygen… 🤦♂️
Bird strikes
Bottles of oxygen are not a bomb son. Oxygen is not flammable. Oxygen is necessary for combustion son. So unless they had an open flame close t on flammable material your conspiracy theory is nonsense son
@@toxico1152literally not
@@Dwade689not there.