Doubling the bass with a bowed instrument is ahistorical for early 17th century repertoire. It's a mature baroque thing that started in France. The familiar modern sound of continuo with chordal instrument+bass should not be applied to music this early.
Taylor DiClemente the assumption you make is that this ensemble was going for 100.0% historical authenticity. Whereas I’m pretty sure, based on the MAGNIFICENT final product, that these music lovers were aiming to simply make great music. I’m a bit of a HIP snob myself, but when it turns into a joyless crossing t’s and dotting i’s we’ve lost our way. Did you like this? Did it move you? If yes, crank the volume and save the quibbling for a d-Phil dissertation on musicology where at least you’ll get credit for it. If not, maybe move on to another piece -or maybe rather another hobby altogether than the Barocco. This rendition, if you ask me, is sublime. So, thanks again for your short treatise on middle Baroque composition and play, we’ve all learned so so much, but from here on maybe tone down the hair-splitting and turn up the speakers. As for me? Maybe another Biber or Bertali before bed or maybe I’ll queue up that 100 piece orchestra performing Pachelbel’s Canon at 440. Why? Because I f**ing like how it sounds, that’s why. I’d pass along a link but I’m afraid you’d insult that joyful conductor and performers as well. By the way, don’t waste your time replying, instead invest it maybe listening to music instead of analyzing it; that is, recapturing your first love before you lost your way in pedantry. Cheers. Before Biber, I’m gonna play this magnificent Schmelzer again - even if not 100.0% to your liking.... uh.:. Because it sounds good. Sorry for what turned into my own dissertation and it’s accompanying rudeness. I’m sure you’ll read me as an ass hat, it’s just I never want to lose the music in the academic fog (so I fight it in myself and others). Cheers.
Schmelzer, para mi hasta hoy un desconocido pero vaya formidables compositor, que hermosa música.
che meraviglia. confesso che non lo conoscevo...
Unconscionable that this has such a low view count. Thanks for introducing me.
Excellent! I thought this combination of instruments would be dull. I was wrong. This music is exciting, even thrilling.
Just going to echo those below me, thanks for this. A rare achievement to reach such mastery. Loved it.
à chaque fois que j'écoute cette oeuvre, je la redécouvre.
Cada vez escucho de nuevo esa obra, la descubro de otra manera
Sencillamente ¡¡¡HERMOSO!!!😍
КАКУЮ ПРЕЛЕСТЬ, ГЕНИЙ ШМЕЛЬЦЕР ТВОРИЛ!!!!!!! ЛУЧШЕЕ ЛЕКАРСТВО ОТ ВСЕХ БОЛЕЗНЕЙ И ВИРУСОВ!!!!
what a nice piece of music
Very beautiful!! Not too many Schmelzer pieces on UA-cam. And I can see the Dutch flag on that sailboat!!
Joyful and uplifting! Thank you!
Schön .
Superb piece - thank you !
Assoluto!
Very calm. I've never heard of this composer
Wonderful
❤❤❤❤
Oh, yes, fayagirl973, with you, with this "muy grandiosa" music, I feel I can fly also, across a magical world: ahhhh!
Damn son! I love this piece. Voices of Music also a great live performance of this piece. Be sure to check them out! 👍
My guess is that the group playing is Chatham Baroque; Catham perhaps is a typo.
Thank you for the post. Most excellent. Rouffillac1066
cool, this is my last name..very nice piece of music.
What is the painting?
Lovely!
?: where is video playing of ApolloFire?
Yes totally other way but i like this !
viva stylus phantasticus !!!
It's ok.
Doubling the bass with a bowed instrument is ahistorical for early 17th century repertoire. It's a mature baroque thing that started in France. The familiar modern sound of continuo with chordal instrument+bass should not be applied to music this early.
Taylor DiClemente the assumption you make is that this ensemble was going for 100.0% historical authenticity. Whereas I’m pretty sure, based on the MAGNIFICENT final product, that these music lovers were aiming to simply make great music. I’m a bit of a HIP snob myself, but when it turns into a joyless crossing t’s and dotting i’s we’ve lost our way.
Did you like this? Did it move you? If yes, crank the volume and save the quibbling for a d-Phil dissertation on musicology where at least you’ll get credit for it. If not, maybe move on to another piece -or maybe rather another hobby altogether than the Barocco. This rendition, if you ask me, is sublime.
So, thanks again for your short treatise on middle Baroque composition and play, we’ve all learned so so much, but from here on maybe tone down the hair-splitting and turn up the speakers. As for me? Maybe another Biber or Bertali before bed or maybe I’ll queue up that 100 piece orchestra performing Pachelbel’s Canon at 440. Why? Because I f**ing like how it sounds, that’s why. I’d pass along a link but I’m afraid you’d insult that joyful conductor and performers as well.
By the way, don’t waste your time replying, instead invest it maybe listening to music instead of analyzing it; that is, recapturing your first love before you lost your way in pedantry. Cheers.
Before Biber, I’m gonna play this magnificent Schmelzer again - even if not 100.0% to your liking.... uh.:. Because it sounds good. Sorry for what turned into my own dissertation and it’s accompanying rudeness. I’m sure you’ll read me as an ass hat, it’s just I never want to lose the music in the academic fog (so I fight it in myself and others). Cheers.
@@AnHebrewChild Yes, i also like this ;-)
Thank you for the information !