Why Nobody Can Fix This $21BN Floating Airport

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 тра 2024
  • Kansai Airport in Japan is an engineering marvel but it's sinking and nobody can fix it. How can such a famous construction mega project go so badly wrong? Today we explore this floating airport and how engineers plan to rebuild this landmark to be fully operational again.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ► OTHER INTERESTING VIDEOS:
    Why Nobody Can Fix This New York Skyscraper
    • Why Nobody Can Fix Thi...
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 156

  • @TheImpossibleBuild
    @TheImpossibleBuild  16 днів тому +30

    Is this the most flawed airport design in the world?

    • @muzkat101
      @muzkat101 16 днів тому +5

      It is obvious that they miscalculated the height needed to ensure it would not subside or sink... keeping in mind erosion and natural subduction, and not sea-level rise. The only real issue now is to not abandon the airport but to incrementally rebuild over it; thereby, building it higher in sections where it is vitally needed most and gradually over other areas until it is high enough to last another 40 years. To do so, they need to sink under water cement deep enough as anchors to create pillars for support, then add stable topsoil filler to rise the foundation. I am pretty sure the whole project would cost a fraction of the previous build to rise and restabilize the foundation.

    • @MrDhandley
      @MrDhandley 15 днів тому

      Very good! 😉👍

    • @bailvik6390
      @bailvik6390 10 днів тому +1

      Germany's "new" airport takes that crown since it has never opened after more then almost 14 years of construction. it is 4 years ago since it was supposed to open.

    • @KevinNguyen-zn4vv
      @KevinNguyen-zn4vv 6 днів тому

      It's man vs nature and costs. They could have over engineered the airport's height if they wanted to but that would cost a lot of $_$.

    • @alexausberlin
      @alexausberlin 5 днів тому

      @@bailvik6390häh? Are you talking about Berlin Brandenburg Airport?

  • @JDHitchman
    @JDHitchman 16 днів тому +126

    Just to be clear, this airport is NOT floating. It is built on man made islands.

    • @laurentitolledo1838
      @laurentitolledo1838 15 днів тому +2

      something is amiss with the video author

    • @msenecal
      @msenecal 10 днів тому +5

      True... If the airport could float this problem wouldn't exist.

    • @l3enjamin5in
      @l3enjamin5in 19 годин тому +1

      It's tricky. If the airport sinks it means that that soil below liquified. If the soil is liquified then the airport is somehow floating, just not by design.

  • @computerjantje
    @computerjantje 15 днів тому +64

    The solution is rather simple: Ask the Dutch to fix it. The Dutch are specialized in solving exactly this.

    • @sabrinarodrigues629
      @sabrinarodrigues629 12 днів тому +1

      My thoughts exactly

    • @markanthony1004
      @markanthony1004 5 днів тому +3

      You are right in that The Dutch know how to keep the water back, but this airport is in the Pacific. It's not the same, BUT maybe The Dutch(love them ngl) can do it. I think Italy should call them too...Miami Just freaking sink I hate that city with a burning passion

    • @portcybertryx222
      @portcybertryx222 5 днів тому +1

      @@markanthony1004bruh what’s your problem with Miami. It’s a great city

    • @martentrudeau6948
      @martentrudeau6948 День тому

      I'll sure Japan has already consulted the Dutch and probably from the airport's beginning. They have are a lot of unknown variables to deal with and they will make it work out of necessity.

    • @Pepe-dq2ib
      @Pepe-dq2ib 14 годин тому

      ​@@martentrudeau6948no, asia is a copycat continent, they can't innovate or create any new technology on their own. They will need western intelligence to fix this and it's simple to them, but japan is stubborn.

  • @pullahuru9168
    @pullahuru9168 16 днів тому +114

    If it was floating airport it would not sink

    • @briancavanagh7048
      @briancavanagh7048 16 днів тому +2

      If its floating the airport would displace water to the weight and its relative volume of sea water.

    • @mohamedshakaal1545
      @mohamedshakaal1545 16 днів тому +2

      Floating Objects Often Sink as pressure is applied on them

    • @wongyoonchark5050
      @wongyoonchark5050 16 днів тому +3

      airport shaking at every wavse passing across

    • @youtubeuser6067
      @youtubeuser6067 15 днів тому +1

      Boats float and sink. That airport is subsiding under its own weight.

    • @puntabachata
      @puntabachata 5 днів тому

      Think of it as the set for the movie Waterworld. It sank several times during filming.

  • @KentBunn
    @KentBunn 16 днів тому +42

    Maybe they should just build an airport at the site of the mountains they removed to get the rock to build this sinking mess.

  • @crazylittlebigthings
    @crazylittlebigthings 15 днів тому +10

    If japan can build Gundams. Japan can also fix an airport.

  • @user-hx6dv8em2m
    @user-hx6dv8em2m 16 днів тому +16

    They already built it that means they can fix it. First, deconstruct all top buildings then strengthen the ground layers under sea. The matter is only how much it cost and how long it take. Also is it worth to fix ?

    • @shooting4star2023
      @shooting4star2023 15 днів тому +2

      Yes, fixing it is absolutely totally worth it. It will be expensive for sure. The alternative would be to build another brand new airport over again from nothing, you don't want to go that route. I can compare this to migrating to Mars, instead of fixing all the problems that we have on Earth.

    • @arizona_anime_fan
      @arizona_anime_fan День тому

      yes it will be worth it. as expensive as this island was to make, the cost of real-estate in Japan is so high and precious it would be more expensive to move it back inland.

  • @user-lg5df8br7d
    @user-lg5df8br7d 11 днів тому +2

    I don’t know how someone can think of a project with these many problems to face and then complete it. We really have crazy people in this world who can think big and actually execute the project. Ball of steel is required to complete such a project.

  • @sofjanmustopoh7232
    @sofjanmustopoh7232 7 днів тому +2

    During the built the construction committee decided the less than ideal compaction is enough .
    When engineering studies show further compaction to reduce sinking is needed .
    So here we are .
    Soon they would need a higher sea wall and one of the largest pumping facility .

  • @TheSocietyPage
    @TheSocietyPage День тому +1

    Winner of the prestigious Sinking Airport award

  • @danlowe8684
    @danlowe8684 16 днів тому +17

    This is no different than New Orleans, San Francisco, Manhattan, and many other coastal cities that were built and/or expanded atop organic material that decomposes naturally, leaving a void that causes the weighty material above to sink.

  • @seanstevenson7592
    @seanstevenson7592 15 днів тому +4

    Thank you for this video.I never knew this even existed. Was good content, good speeds?Please keep it up with more interesting videos

  • @user-ek5rk1er3f
    @user-ek5rk1er3f 16 днів тому +23

    It’s NOT a ‘floating’ airport👎👎

    • @hongqi5734
      @hongqi5734 16 днів тому

      Underwater airport to the underwater world. 😂

    • @billy.7113
      @billy.7113 14 днів тому

      👍👍 for your 👎👎

  • @kokonana4086
    @kokonana4086 14 днів тому +2

    For some odd reason, I'm thinking about Dubai's Palm Island Project all the way while watching this.
    Talking about Kasai, the ingenuity of Japanese engineering is remarkable here. Their method is simple yet works. They basically slide a piece of metal plate into the suspension column to keep the ground levelled.

  • @OfficialKaitheroleplayerYTNews
    @OfficialKaitheroleplayerYTNews 7 днів тому +3

    Don’t worry.they are just making it more higher every few years

  • @MrDhandley
    @MrDhandley 15 днів тому +1

    So why didn’t they make it a truly floating airport? Surely it would have been considerably cheaper and quicker to build.

  • @noobsfansub
    @noobsfansub 16 днів тому +3

    At the price of refreshments for everyone I'm surprised it wasn't cheaper to build a new airport on the spot.

    • @noobsfansub
      @noobsfansub 16 днів тому

      But man I just don't get it. In a country prone to earthquakes and typhoon, in an era when we're experiencing rising sea levels, building an airport there was very short sighted

    • @jonlaurenzreyes1902
      @jonlaurenzreyes1902 2 дні тому

      @@noobsfansub they knew that sea lvl will rise the problem was they miscalculated that the weight of the airport will increase the speed of sinking

  • @ichalid22
    @ichalid22 14 днів тому +1

    So if they know it will stop sinking at some point and it can be raised/adjusted with hydraulics, why not just build new and higher concrete walls around it to protect it from water?

  • @watchthe1369
    @watchthe1369 16 днів тому +4

    ooncrete grout injection? Drive some holes around the perimeter and make a sort of "batub by grouting with hydraulic curing grout?

    • @watchthe1369
      @watchthe1369 16 днів тому +1

      once that stabilizes everything you can refill the sinking bowl and just do that every decade or so until everything finally hit bedrock or equibrilium

  • @johnjones5354
    @johnjones5354 13 годин тому

    Floating? You can't possibly believe that airport is FLOATING!!

  • @stephenc2296
    @stephenc2296 11 днів тому +1

    I save beach land daily. I inject slow curing resin that hardens into sandstone.

  • @MissCheeseE
    @MissCheeseE 8 годин тому

    I flew to that airport last year, I went to visit my family in Hokkaido, then flew to Osaka in order to go to Kyoto via train.

  • @scottmarquardt3575
    @scottmarquardt3575 13 днів тому +1

    Raise the nearest mountain. Build a conveyor to send the dirt to the airport

  • @Binahx86
    @Binahx86 15 днів тому +1

    Human "ingeniuty" always has a limit, especially when financial limit is one of those limits. Here the problem was assuming the underwater base would "fully compress", How??? It is not confined to a specific area so it wont "fully" compress. If small volumes of foamy water can have its way with beach sand, imagine underwater currents versus any type of sand.

  • @treefarm3288
    @treefarm3288 2 дні тому

    Interesting to learn about this airport I have used a few times. Thanks.

  • @tommybotts
    @tommybotts 2 дні тому +2

    Why didn't they just build a huge keel underneath like a ship?

  • @Jude74
    @Jude74 7 днів тому +1

    They will build a replacement in the area nearest to the mainland and use the old islands as a buffer. Thats the only possible solution. Japan routinely replaces its buildings because of substantial and frequent earthquakes. They knew they would have to do this again someday.

  • @phgamer4393
    @phgamer4393 2 дні тому +1

    their mistake was not making a artificial barrier reef.

  • @Phil-D83
    @Phil-D83 16 днів тому +4

    It works, but has issues

    • @Flyingmachines350
      @Flyingmachines350 14 днів тому

      It's doing its job. The typhoon event was likely higher than the designed level event and the continuous settlement was going to eventually stabilize but the beyond design level typhoon event caused more weight on the dredged material that caused additional settlement. It's a circular problem that the engineers did well to contain and continue to improvise to keep the airport functioning for the past 25 years. It's no easy task but creating more landmass was needed.

  • @paulstanak689
    @paulstanak689 16 днів тому +2

    If you think you can push back the ocean…try very hard to think again…if you can !!!

  • @pukavoket
    @pukavoket 5 днів тому +1

    Next airport should be built on land, just level mountain tops, If they were able to fill..they can level!

  • @rjones6219
    @rjones6219 6 днів тому +1

    Going to make for interesting pre-take off calculations, with the runways below sea level.

  • @retepeyahaled2961
    @retepeyahaled2961 16 днів тому +2

    I think it is impossible to simply lift the entire airport. You can only demolish it, heighten the island and rebuild the airport. And all has to be done in stages, because meanwhile the airport has to stay in use, I guess.

    • @markbarta2369
      @markbarta2369 15 днів тому

      The airport buildings were built on jacks as they expected settlement. Just not as much as they're experiencing. So it's basically an infill/stabilization project and what is involved in stabilizing it... If it is even possible, which nobody is certain of.

  • @briancavanagh7048
    @briancavanagh7048 16 днів тому +2

    Potential repurposing of the facilities to a sea planes & flying boat port.
    Sunk costs?

  • @brucewilson1958
    @brucewilson1958 10 днів тому +1

    If they had built it on pillars set on bedrock and an I-beam substructure it would have worked. Or, if they had floated it on helium balloons from Walmart.

  • @Agapimo
    @Agapimo 16 днів тому +1

    Coupled with the varying rates of sea level rise, this seems like it was KNOWN to be structurally unsound from the beginning. Perhaps a truly FLOATING SUBPLATFORM would be the only lasting solution.
    I lived in Nagasaki prefecture and Nagoya city and Japan is UNIQUE in that it refuses to build much on hillsides, unlike cities such as Los Angeles which makes for beautiful nature preserving landscapes, but wastes arable land for cities.

  • @BenKlassen1
    @BenKlassen1 11 годин тому

    This is why they pre-compress soils with a tall pile of dirt first on major projects like this now.

  • @marsbearmcw3050
    @marsbearmcw3050 17 годин тому

    I’ve used this airport and it’s amazing. Much better than the nightmare at narita.

  • @TheOldTeddy
    @TheOldTeddy 13 годин тому

    They can calculate the weight of our Sun, the calculation of the weight of this structure is easily within the ability of engineering students in their 2nd year.

  • @edwardpatrickdetrafford-mo8347
    @edwardpatrickdetrafford-mo8347 16 днів тому +1

    ⚔️As a follower of this fascinating airport, since it inception; I’m thrilled to see this latest up date. Maybe ~ 25 ago when it was sinking, but had the jacks on top of the pylons; I felt that could finally be at peace. Until it was reported that the jacking system was maxed out. I did arrive at speculative solution, when there was no online place available for me to comment on it. Resistance: The first was because the clay acts in a similar way that aquifers do. Second was the extra weight being added with more asphalt to keep the airfield above water. One solution is to relieve the area of extra weight. But what do we use to keep its present elevation stable? I thought of a flood plain that raised every rainy season that put water weigh on the top of a concrete sewer infrastructure project I graded. Civil Engineers use wood chips from a local mill, above the sand that’s on top of the pipe, then the excavated native soil was added to the top of the wood chips, to counter the extra seasonal water weight. So, where beneath the airfield do we put this replacement, or what else besides pneumatic balloon materials filled with ~ air, is used? There’s always under the pinning procedure, to replace, the removed materials. Removal of the surface in a cylinder shape like the manholes used for infrastructure pipes maintenance, dug to a allowable depth, then added the above suggestion for replacement; that is done continually throughout the surface, could relieve enough weight/ pressure. My idea has also come from a Star Trek series, that when crews were faces with an alien invasion force, that increased their offensive power each time, the crew increased their level of defences. Finally, when it was decided to back off the defensive tactics, then so, did the alien’s force. Good luck. Thanks for the update. 🛡️

  • @halporter9
    @halporter9 4 дні тому

    Obviously pumping water deep below the airport won’t help, probably hurt. Sometimes this can help in areas where sinking is partly due to groundwater / petroleum has been pumped out over the years. Given possible liquefaction of the clay, it would have to below anyway.

  • @kyzoaryant9905
    @kyzoaryant9905 16 днів тому +2

    It easy to fix fillup to 100m above the sea

  • @mayuri4184
    @mayuri4184 День тому

    Last I went to Japan some one month ago, I first landed at Kansai International Airport. To think that the airport I landed in was sinking...

  • @mrMacGoover
    @mrMacGoover 15 днів тому +1

    You know the Bible talks of a parable of the unwise building their house upon the sand but the wise building upon the rock, it metamorphic but also rings true the real world as well.

    • @user-lg5df8br7d
      @user-lg5df8br7d 11 днів тому

      Bullshit. 😂

    • @mrMacGoover
      @mrMacGoover 11 днів тому

      @@user-lg5df8br7d Says the idiot who rarely has so much as glanced at a Bible.

  • @jimmanney4948
    @jimmanney4948 19 годин тому

    This man made island has been sinking since the day it was built. Filling in artificial islands isn’t a good idea.

  • @michaelwells7348
    @michaelwells7348 15 днів тому +2

    O Those Crazy Japanese ..... PH....

  • @OzzyTrespalacios
    @OzzyTrespalacios 16 днів тому +2

    Floating airport? Come on!

  • @noco-pf3vj
    @noco-pf3vj День тому

    It is not floating, I thought it was floating like a boat. The other problem this airport has, is Godzilla stomping around sometime.

  • @SanBrunoBeacon
    @SanBrunoBeacon День тому

    Japan needs to build a new airport before the ocean rises to a depth that floods Kansai, making it impossible for planes to use the airport. They can't stop the ocean from rising, and they can't afford to keep spending billions of dollars trying to stop the inevitable drowning of the airport.

  • @ArtFreeman
    @ArtFreeman 11 годин тому

    Tokyo is not a city. It is a prefecture or state with multiple cities. Whereas Oosaka is a city.

  • @YourOldUncleNoongah
    @YourOldUncleNoongah 9 годин тому

    Thats a LOT of Hecters!

  • @JosephSato-1997
    @JosephSato-1997 12 днів тому +1

    The title is misleading, it is not a floating structure. And no, it cannot be fixed. The more weight added to the structure, at the very bottom of the structure the soil will be pushed aside and it will simply sink further. It is doomed.

  • @andrewfoster259
    @andrewfoster259 16 днів тому +12

    It's not bloody floating

  • @Johnny-pp7dx
    @Johnny-pp7dx 16 днів тому +1

    Maybe joey can buy them a new one

  • @onexoxtoo
    @onexoxtoo 13 днів тому

    They expected it would sink and has the solution for it, only that the sinking rate is faster so they have to work faster and cost more.

  • @Nail56
    @Nail56 14 днів тому

    Actually, the've stoped the sinking with 999 steel pilings. This has been so successful they're going to build another island,

  • @davidofshield4452
    @davidofshield4452 16 днів тому +1

    Floating airport the engineering modern marvel will end up as a big mistake....no?

  • @iliketacos6067
    @iliketacos6067 18 годин тому

    WALLS AND PUMPS thats all i gotta say

  • @jimmanney4948
    @jimmanney4948 19 годин тому

    Not an engineering marvel it more like a nightmare

  • @teonorman1892
    @teonorman1892 16 днів тому

    The ocean is claiming every shores around the world.

  • @mrparkerdan
    @mrparkerdan 11 днів тому

    Rising global sea levels will also be an issue

  • @laurentitolledo1838
    @laurentitolledo1838 15 днів тому

    Man made it, only Man can fix it!
    ..what do you expect? animals and/or plants to fix the airport?

  • @ManuelGarcia-ww7gj
    @ManuelGarcia-ww7gj 11 днів тому

    Is the airport floating, or is it sinking? Kind of hard to have it both ways, yes?

  • @KaliforniaLA
    @KaliforniaLA 14 днів тому

    Apparently the narrator doesn’t know what the “floating” means. It’s not floating. It has not drifted off the coast of California.

  • @fr57ujf
    @fr57ujf 10 годин тому

    If it's on an island, it isn't floating. Duh.

  • @maxhugen
    @maxhugen 15 днів тому +1

    Why does the Title describe this as *"Floating"* since these are islands? Silly clickbait.

  • @aca9876
    @aca9876 8 днів тому

    Just put a water tight wall all around it....

  • @mattcolver1
    @mattcolver1 15 днів тому +1

    I remember landing there shortly after it opened.
    Coming in for landing, looking out the window you feel like you're going to land in the ocean. You're so low over the water then at the last second there's the runway.

  • @giselavaleazar8768
    @giselavaleazar8768 15 днів тому

    I guess the Dutch were not involved in creating this land from water.

  • @frankfeng4728
    @frankfeng4728 6 днів тому

    Is there hope? Even the islands stop sinking, the sea level will rise due to climate change. Right?

  • @illuminaughty2929
    @illuminaughty2929 9 днів тому

    Dubai has no problems with water and planes

  • @ltdees2362
    @ltdees2362 16 днів тому

    🤣I say to "hector" with the whole damn sinking mess...whatever a "hector" is 😛

    • @timmied8461
      @timmied8461 16 днів тому +1

      "Hector" is the guy whom built the airport! 🤣

    • @ltdees2362
      @ltdees2362 16 днів тому

      @@timmied8461 Lol !! poor Hector better find a bigass mountain to fill in that bigass sink hole 🤣

  • @youbewb5581
    @youbewb5581 15 днів тому

    Good puns, good puns.

  • @chandrachurniyogi8394
    @chandrachurniyogi8394 16 днів тому +2

    there's a way to minimise the sinking rate of the island airport . . . concentrated air pressure at temperatures not exceeding 74°C . . .

  • @epicshade3463
    @epicshade3463 16 днів тому +1

    I figured at this point it would of been known that artificial islands will never be the permanent place they want.SO now not just screwing yourselves but the people who actually pay for it.

    • @timlass6103
      @timlass6103 15 днів тому

      The artificial islands will become permanent, eventually; once the settling stops. It just sank farther and faster than engineers expected. This airport will eventually be fine, but major renovations to keep it operating must continue until the sinking stops.

  • @bosoerjadi2838
    @bosoerjadi2838 2 дні тому

    Right, so it can't be fixed because.. it can't be fixed?

  • @hyy3657
    @hyy3657 11 днів тому

    planet same coral maybe it will be land again

  • @user-vw7ig5by9u
    @user-vw7ig5by9u 15 днів тому +2

    The seismic activity was always going to destroy this airport. It's should have been a no-brainer. It was always going to be a matter of time before the breakup began.
    "Despite the sinkage problem, the airport proved to be quite resilient!" Despite getting ripped open by the iceberg, the Titanic held up well!

  • @charliechristie2949
    @charliechristie2949 15 днів тому

    For the Japanese government to construct an airport where they are constantly at odds with nature, they just have too much money and too many nutty engineers.

    • @joelshack85
      @joelshack85 15 днів тому

      Another case of the government "experts" failing it's population.

  • @johnlaw6735
    @johnlaw6735 10 днів тому

    China does, they turned it down. Because the Chinese didn't want to sing "American Pie" and the SKs don't know either🤣

  • @zzzzzsleeping
    @zzzzzsleeping 15 днів тому +1

    You can't fool mother natures

  • @LawpickingLocksmith
    @LawpickingLocksmith 14 днів тому

    They fixed 2 craters made by the Yanks, this will be peanuts to fix!

  • @ronoconnor8971
    @ronoconnor8971 19 годин тому

    China built a military base on a Chinese built island. What a shame to hope for typhoons

  • @kapikoyli
    @kapikoyli 16 днів тому

    🛸🛸✈✈🚀🚀

  • @hillaryclinton1314
    @hillaryclinton1314 18 годин тому

    Its called contingency planning. They dont got it

  • @Ytevel
    @Ytevel 15 днів тому +1

    Maybe I have an idea of how to stop the sinking. How can I create contact with the right people?

  • @Krashman666
    @Krashman666 16 днів тому +1

    what a waste of money and resources. Dubai is facing the same issue with so much waste to create to only be destroyed. all coastal cities in the world will be decimated from rising sea levels, flooding and earthquakes. a small rise in global sea levels has massive effects on flooding. 1 inch of rise can shift tides to several feet. People keep talking about the year 2100 but in reality its already happening now and the flooding is getting worse every year. Rapid escalation of global weather crisis and spending trillions of dollars holding water back isn't the answer. Holding water back is temporary for relocation and its a major financial burden waste of resources. Do your research on flooding the past 60 years because thats how long i have been watching the world change. Change is happening much much faster than they are saying. I see the devastation around the world already. You all need to relocate to 200 feet above sea level for future generations to be sustainable.

  • @USMilitaryOnSpot
    @USMilitaryOnSpot 4 дні тому

    We love Japanese

  • @coolandgood0062
    @coolandgood0062 2 дні тому

    Everybody knows it is not floating...

  • @jennyjansen754
    @jennyjansen754 16 днів тому +1

    Can't build on land because Japan doesn't have eminent domain.

  • @whocaresdude2001
    @whocaresdude2001 16 днів тому

    Waste of 10 minutes. This was a 2 minute video, it settled faster than expect no end in sight.

  • @antnam4406
    @antnam4406 16 днів тому

    Could have just built it on land.

  • @shooting4star2023
    @shooting4star2023 16 днів тому +2

    Strictly speaking, it's not built in an "ocean." The surrounding sea is Osaka Bay, part of the Seto Inland Sea, not part of Pacific Ocean.

  • @mukuldave7767
    @mukuldave7767 13 днів тому +1

    Raise the steel walls corner to corner below Airport from seabed till it touches to under surface of airport.
    Fill this cornered regions with High density extremely thick foam .
    Side walls prevent foam spreading to ocean.
    Foam raises Airport evenlyfrom seabed.
    Allow water escape at clearance near seabed as foam expand it displaces water.
    When foam is expanding make sure it is expanding within cubical form. Making it like Foam bricks supporting Airport.
    Side walls shall never allow foam to escape.
    It shall maintain uplifting Airport upward and sinking would stop.
    Also if Airport raises to initial limit then anchors could be realigned to initial first mark position.
    This is how one can surely stop Airport sinking.
    Hope your goodself would pass this comment. To Japan Authority of Airports.

  • @tonbopro
    @tonbopro 16 днів тому

    built too low?

  • @glennlittle1580
    @glennlittle1580 8 днів тому

    It was built because theres no land

  • @clintosorus2647
    @clintosorus2647 15 днів тому +2

    3:08 "Japan is a relatively large country" Um. What?

  • @JadaCole8
    @JadaCole8 15 годин тому

    Wat a worst of money

  • @Hendramail2000
    @Hendramail2000 14 днів тому

    Good post

  • @samfrancisco8095
    @samfrancisco8095 13 днів тому

    Its not floating