So check it. eons ago when i was young. i built a stroker using an old turbo diesel crank. e rods. I think 528i euro pistons. 272 schrick cam. some automatic computer, they were capable of more fueling dont quote me on that. a chip from turnermotorsports. 325is block and head. it made 230 at the motor and over 300ftlbs. loved it. want to build another.
@@ChristopherRyan-j8u i am assuming it was a naturally aspirated engine and if so the reading would make it about 20% higher than the best NA engines of all time which is just not happening with that spec of a 2.7L. Clearly either the dyno was in error such as a faulty rpm signal which would over estimate torque or the software output was not giving the true torque that other dynos give such as a Mainline dyno where the torque is defined differently than say a dynojet.
Sounds great
So check it. eons ago when i was young. i built a stroker using an old turbo diesel crank. e rods. I think 528i euro pistons. 272 schrick cam. some automatic computer, they were capable of more fueling dont quote me on that. a chip from turnermotorsports. 325is block and head. it made 230 at the motor and over 300ftlbs. loved it. want to build another.
No way it made 300ftlb
@@dmc5681really man. i was there. 315ftlb. the guy running the dyno even said something. it was an amazing engine. i thrashed for years
@@ChristopherRyan-j8u i am assuming it was a naturally aspirated engine and if so the reading would make it about 20% higher than the best NA engines of all time which is just not happening with that spec of a 2.7L. Clearly either the dyno was in error such as a faulty rpm signal which would over estimate torque or the software output was not giving the true torque that other dynos give such as a Mainline dyno where the torque is defined differently than say a dynojet.
Hallo
What compression ratio which cam and engine ecu? Thanks
engine power or wheel power?