Products are ingenious. Here is my solution: X⁵ - 3X² - 216=0; add 3X² + 216 to both sides of the equation: X⁵ - 3X² - 216 + 3X² + 216 = 3X² + 216 X⁵ = 3X² + 216; 3 can be factored from the terms on the right side of this equation X⁵ = 3(X² + 72); now since X⁵ must be divisible by 3, only multiples of 3 need be tested for X: 3, 6, 9,12,...etc. testing 3: 3⁵=3(3² +72) 243 = 3(9+72) 243=3(81) 243=243; 3 checks out testing 6: 6⁵=3(6² + 72) 7,776=3(36+72) 7,776=3(108) 7,776=324; 6 fails since 7,776≠324 No other of the integers need to be tested since it is immediately evident that it's fifth power is going to be much larger than 3 times it's square + 216, because 6 already yielded a number much larger, and anything greater than 6 will yield a number larger still, so 3 is the sole solution.
Nice solution and explanation. There is a way to shorten the solution (from 4:38), as follows: In every one of the three presented scenarios, the expression x^3 - 3 must get an even value. This condition may be satisfied if and only if x is odd. Therefore, the single positive integer solution is: x = 3 .
I didn’t even need to pick up my pen. I was directly involved with the rules and concluded that there was only one factor in this equation. Then, I just imagined the value of two and realized that it would be small. Then I tried three, and got the answer.
Seems like you’re more interested in flexing your mental shortcuts than engaging with the purpose here. This isn’t about showing off; it’s about growth and understanding. If you’re missing that, maybe take a moment to reflect on what this space is actually for.
The equation can be written in the form (x-3)(x⁴+3x³+9x²+24x+72)=0, the first factor is zero for x=3 and the second factor is the sum of positive numbers and its minimum value is 72 and therefore it is not zero for every natural number x and thus the only solution to the equation in the set of natural numbers is x=3
Since the solution is a integer it should be a divisor of 216 by trial and error we get x=3 as solution. Then by Horner method the factors of x^5-3x^2-216 are x-3 and x^4+3x^3+9x^2+24x+72. The latter one has no positive solutions therefore x=3 is the only positive integer solution
Plot y=x^5 and y=3x^2+216 (parabolic formula y=ax^2+c), then only one intersection point can exist and that is either 3 or 4 (told to find positive integer). By substitution, when x=3, y=243 for both equations.
Sir I am an Indian 14 year old student. thank you for explaining all your videos in very curious and fun way😊😊. I have very keen interest in mathematics. and through your channel I got a medium to study more about maths can you make a video on following problem? If sin A, sin B, sin C are in AP and cos A, cos B, cos C are in GP, then Value of (cos²A+Cos²C - 4 Cos A•CosC )/1 - Sin A•Sin B if video is not possible then can you please explain it in comments
I should have known the diophantine part was relevant, since I tried to solve it like a normal quintic. I guessed x = 3 as one of the roots and then divided and got a polynomial with all positive coefficients. By that I reasoned that if that polynomial has any real roots, they must be negative since all the terms are positive [so they couldn't add up to 0 in any way]. That reasoning should have been enough for me to know that x = 3 was the only real root.
You forgot to check x = 1 216 = 1³ • 2³ • 3³ You only need to veify three cases for the factor x³-3: case x=1 x³ - 3 = 1³ - 3 = -2 No valid vale cause x² (x³-3)=216 and x² is positive and x³-3 is negative. Case x=2 x³ - 3 = 2³ - 3 = 5 No. Five is not a factor of 216. Case x=3 x³ - 3 = 3³ - 3 = 3 (3² - 1) = 24 Found. 24 is factor of 216. Test: x² (x³ - 3) = 3² • 24 = 216
We know that (x^3 - 3) divides 216=6^3. And x^3 must be smaller than 6^3. So it is just a matter of testing cubes less than 6^3. Working backward from x=5, we quickly find that x=3 is the only solution.
I used bijection theorem (don't know the english name) : I caluculate the derivate and then I saw there is only one real solution, greater than 1. Then, I also used the rationnal root theorem : if a positive integer is solution then it must divide 6^3. It works for x=3 □
it is easy to see that he function f(x)=x5-3x2 has a strictly positive derivative for integer x>1. f(2)=20 is too small , f(3)=216 is a solution and so is the only solution as as f'>0 for integer x>1.
Instead of putting the the number in the question and checking if it statisfies the equation you could've checked by using the factor (x3-3) For example, For x=2, instead of finding f(2), put x3= 54+3. x≠integer, hence rejected. It will make the solution faster.
Sir please do a limit question which was came in JEE Advanced 2014 shift-1 question number 57 it's a question of a limit lim as x-->1 [{-ax + Sin(x-1) + a}/{x + Sin(x-1) - 1}]^[{1-x}/{1-√x}] = 1/4 You have to find the greatest value of a It has 2 possible answers 0 and 2 But I want the reason that why should I reject 2 and accept 0 Because final answer is 0 Please help 😢
Sir please do a limit question which was came in JEE Advanced 2014 shift-1 question number 57 it's a question of a limit lim as x-->1 [{-ax + Sin(x-1) + a}/{x + Sin(x-1) - 1}]^[{1-x}/{1-√x}] = 1/4 You have to find the greatest value of a It has 2 possible answers 0 and 2 But I want the reason that why should I reject 2 and accept 0 Because final answer is 0 Please help 😢
Products are ingenious. Here is my solution:
X⁵ - 3X² - 216=0; add 3X² + 216 to both sides of the equation:
X⁵ - 3X² - 216 + 3X² + 216 = 3X² + 216
X⁵ = 3X² + 216; 3 can be factored from the terms on the right side of this equation
X⁵ = 3(X² + 72); now since X⁵ must be divisible by 3, only multiples of 3 need be tested for X: 3, 6, 9,12,...etc.
testing 3: 3⁵=3(3² +72)
243 = 3(9+72)
243=3(81)
243=243; 3 checks out
testing 6: 6⁵=3(6² + 72)
7,776=3(36+72)
7,776=3(108)
7,776=324; 6 fails since 7,776≠324
No other of the integers need to be tested since it is immediately evident that it's fifth power is going to be much larger than 3 times it's square + 216, because 6 already yielded a number much larger, and anything greater than 6 will yield a number larger still, so 3 is the sole solution.
Nice
I love your channel, please don't stop. I am self teaching myself maths and physics and your channel amaze me. Never stop.
The number 1 wasn’t invited to the perfect square party.😔
That was obvious prejudice against such an innocent number. I apologize.
To be fair, while it was an oversight... Pretty clearly, 1 - 3 - 216 =/= 0.
bro dosent know the existence of ≠
if we factorize the LHS further
(x-1)(x^2)(x^2+x+1)=216
then we can see that x cant be 1 because the presence of factor x-1.
also consider (x-1)
@@cristinafreitas6742 One needs an "equations editor" for it, not a standard KB.
Nice solution and explanation.
There is a way to shorten the solution (from 4:38), as follows:
In every one of the three presented scenarios, the expression x^3 - 3 must get an even value. This condition may be satisfied if and only if x is odd. Therefore, the single positive integer solution is:
x = 3 .
Love the approach - gives us opportunity to embrace our own version
By Descartes law of Signs, there is only 1 positive root or zero.
I didn’t even need to pick up my pen. I was directly involved with the rules and concluded that there was only one factor in this equation. Then, I just imagined the value of two and realized that it would be small. Then I tried three, and got the answer.
Seems like you’re more interested in flexing your mental shortcuts than engaging with the purpose here. This isn’t about showing off; it’s about growth and understanding. If you’re missing that, maybe take a moment to reflect on what this space is actually for.
i am wathing you from india i love your videos a lot
The equation can be written in the form (x-3)(x⁴+3x³+9x²+24x+72)=0, the first factor is zero for x=3 and the second factor is the sum of positive numbers and its minimum value is 72 and therefore it is not zero for every natural number x and thus the only solution to the equation in the set of natural numbers is x=3
Descartes' Rule of Signs tells us there is exactly one positive solution - which is quickly found to be 3 since 243 - 27 - 216 = 0.
Since the solution is a integer it should be a divisor of 216 by trial and error we get x=3 as solution. Then by Horner method the factors of x^5-3x^2-216 are x-3 and x^4+3x^3+9x^2+24x+72. The latter one has no positive solutions therefore x=3 is the only positive integer solution
Plot y=x^5 and y=3x^2+216 (parabolic formula y=ax^2+c), then only one intersection point can exist and that is either 3 or 4 (told to find positive integer). By substitution, when x=3, y=243 for both equations.
Nice solution as always.
Sir I am an Indian 14 year old student. thank you for explaining all your videos in very curious and fun way😊😊. I have very keen interest in mathematics. and through your channel I got a medium to study more about maths
can you make a video on following problem?
If sin A, sin B, sin C are in AP and cos A, cos B, cos C are in GP, then
Value of (cos²A+Cos²C - 4 Cos A•CosC )/1 - Sin A•Sin B
if video is not possible then can you please explain it in comments
You could have checked the solutions easier by seeing if the x you picked satisfied x^3-3 = , instead of plugging it into the origin equation
Very nice. Loved it…..
I should have known the diophantine part was relevant, since I tried to solve it like a normal quintic.
I guessed x = 3 as one of the roots and then divided and got a polynomial with all positive coefficients. By that I reasoned that if that polynomial has any real roots, they must be negative since all the terms are positive [so they couldn't add up to 0 in any way].
That reasoning should have been enough for me to know that x = 3 was the only real root.
You forgot to check x = 1
216 = 1³ • 2³ • 3³
You only need to veify three cases for the factor x³-3:
case x=1
x³ - 3 = 1³ - 3 = -2
No valid vale cause x² (x³-3)=216 and x² is positive and x³-3 is negative.
Case x=2
x³ - 3 = 2³ - 3 = 5
No. Five is not a factor of 216.
Case x=3
x³ - 3 = 3³ - 3 = 3 (3² - 1) = 24
Found. 24 is factor of 216.
Test: x² (x³ - 3) = 3² • 24 = 216
7:02 you can usethe factor theorem also just to see if you get any other solutions
We know that (x^3 - 3) divides 216=6^3. And x^3 must be smaller than 6^3. So it is just a matter of testing cubes less than 6^3. Working backward from x=5, we quickly find that x=3 is the only solution.
I used bijection theorem (don't know the english name) : I caluculate the derivate and then I saw there is only one real solution, greater than 1.
Then, I also used the rationnal root theorem : if a positive integer is solution then it must divide 6^3. It works for x=3 □
Let's get into the video... ❤ arousing my interest ever to watch More and more
It's easy to show that x = 3 is the single real solution to the equation: x^5 - 3x^2 - 216 = 0 .
Is it not true, that integer solutions are divisors of the constant term? Would brute force not work? Simply try +/-1, +/-2, +/-3, +/-6 -> done?
Z+ ? What happened to IN ?
Rational root theorem would get us there more mechanically
it is easy to see that he function f(x)=x5-3x2 has a strictly positive derivative for integer x>1. f(2)=20 is too small , f(3)=216 is a solution and so is the only solution as as f'>0 for integer x>1.
Instead of putting the the number in the question and checking if it statisfies the equation you could've checked by using the factor (x3-3)
For example,
For x=2, instead of finding f(2), put x3= 54+3. x≠integer, hence rejected.
It will make the solution faster.
Sir please do a limit question which was came in
JEE Advanced 2014 shift-1 question number 57
it's a question of a limit
lim as x-->1
[{-ax + Sin(x-1) + a}/{x + Sin(x-1) - 1}]^[{1-x}/{1-√x}] = 1/4
You have to find the greatest value of a
It has 2 possible answers 0 and 2
But I want the reason that why should I reject 2 and accept 0
Because final answer is 0
Please help 😢
f(2^x )+f(2^(-x) )=1,f(2)=? can you solve this? thanks
x^5+/-x^4+/-x^3-3x^2+/-x-216=0 , (x-3)(x^4+3x^3+9x^2+24x+72)=0 , / x^4+3x^3+9x^2+24x+72=0 , complex roots , not a solu / ,
1 -3 solu , x=3 ,
3 -9
9 -27
24 -72
72 -216
x=3ans
Dude just use synthetic division😂😂
x = 3 works Just start with x =1 and test, then x = 2 then test , x= 3 then test too easy
x²(x^3 - 3) = 4*54
x² = 4, x = 2, so x^3 - 3 = 5, not 54
more easy to see if it's a solution :p
Indians assemble here❤
Could you please stop commenting shit like this everywhere
Sir please do a limit question which was came in
JEE Advanced 2014 shift-1 question number 57
it's a question of a limit
lim as x-->1
[{-ax + Sin(x-1) + a}/{x + Sin(x-1) - 1}]^[{1-x}/{1-√x}] = 1/4
You have to find the greatest value of a
It has 2 possible answers 0 and 2
But I want the reason that why should I reject 2 and accept 0
Because final answer is 0
Please help 😢
Tonight