Thanks Craig this is awesome ... Clear well presented demonstrating as per usual. And hey what two hundred pounds you say (!) that be over 90kg ... What a heavy beast Anyway - greetings from the southern hemisphere. Cheers
@@user-ku2qb1pq7e I disagree, seems like Craig is saying widening the vector angle dramatically improves the 2:1 ratio of a basal tie system but still doesn't accomplish the 1:1 of MRS. It has other advantages though like changing the angle that force is applied the limb and union, plus safety and convenience.
@@maclolma I interpret that he's showing the conversion of force by means of torque at the limb union transferring to compression through the canopy. I believe he's showing that you can distribute load not necessarily reduce the absolute force value..? 🤗 (It's safer to distribute a force of 2:1 through compression and torque rather than a 1:1 of solely torque
Thanks Craig this is awesome ... Clear well presented demonstrating as per usual.
And hey what two hundred pounds you say (!) that be over 90kg ... What a heavy beast
Anyway - greetings from the southern hemisphere. Cheers
Valuable info, well explained. Thanks!
Great video
Hi ! Where did you found your top ?
When you open that vector, are you getting less torque or force applied to the limb than with a MRS 1:1 system?
Yes. MRS would pull straight down on the TIP, which torques the limb attachment more than a basal tie would.
@@user-ku2qb1pq7e I disagree, seems like Craig is saying widening the vector angle dramatically improves the 2:1 ratio of a basal tie system but still doesn't accomplish the 1:1 of MRS. It has other advantages though like changing the angle that force is applied the limb and union, plus safety and convenience.
@@maclolma I interpret that he's showing the conversion of force by means of torque at the limb union transferring to compression through the canopy. I believe he's showing that you can distribute load not necessarily reduce the absolute force value..? 🤗 (It's safer to distribute a force of 2:1 through compression and torque rather than a 1:1 of solely torque