Alexander Zverev domestic abuse case dropped after settlement reached | The Break
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 чер 2024
- --
Tennis Channel is the only 24-hour network dedicated to tennis: both sport and lifestyle. It’s the number one destination for breaking news, live scores, pop culture, entertainment, and travel-all to help fans stay on top of the game.
Subscribe to Tennis Channel Plus to stream over 4,500 live and on-demand matches from over 100 ATP & WTA events buytcplus.com.
Watch live and exclusive content at: tennischannel.com
Read the latest at: www.tennis.com/
Stay on top of on-and off-court tennis content: baseline.tennis.com/
Twitter: / tennischannel & / tennis
Instagram: / tennischannel
Facebook: / tennischannel & / tennismedia
TikTok: / tennischannel
Snap: / tennis.channel
Threads: www.threads.net/@tennischannel - Спорт
he's out there like an idiot saying this proves he's innocent. no, he settled to avoid admitting guilt
I'm sorry but as a survivor of abuse there's no amount of cash that would make me not pursue my claim legally.
The fact that this person could put a price tag on it seems duplicitous to me.
That is not how law works. We are innocent until proven otherwise beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law. There was no ruling thus his innocence is maintained. The prosecution withdrew their case after the ex-girlfriend was questioned. She doesn't receive any money & he gets joint custody. The settlement covers court costs related to the trial.
No he did not settle to avoid admitting guilt. The settlement was connected to child custody and he finally won joint custody. There was no payment to accuser. She withdrew the charges because there was so much evidence of her lying if you read the German news summary of the first day of trial of the defense evidence. When it came time to testify she reported stopped her testimony and left court early. Then the next day of trial she withdrew the charges and agreed to joint custody finally because she was about to be exposed as a fraud. She was simply a gold digger who used a rich, young good looking athlete as a sugar daddy sperm donor, tried to keep their child from having a relationship with her father and finally lost that pursuit. Shame on her.
@@got2bjosh presumed innocent not proven.
@@jerguskrc Yes, you don’t prove innocence in court, per se. Innocence is presumed (i.e-taken as already being true) & therefore needs to be disproven beyond a reasonable doubt or upheld in a court of law. There’s mere semantics & then there’s clarity in distinction.
This is the second incident he was accused of. For those saying they suspect she was lying, I can say that what we see is a potential pattern of behaviour by Zverev.
Deutsche Marks TALK!!!!
Always Suspicious of the abused accepting pay off... especially against a high profile person WHY? destroys her credibility? especially when a 3yr old child was also used against her case against Zverev ...
The prosecution withdrew their case after questioning her in preparation for cross examination. She doesn't receive any money. The settlement covers court costs related to the trial.
It’s all about the money money money but we’ve known thattt
There's a lot of conjecture out there, so let's just stick to the facts.
The court case originally began as a protracted custody battle with his ex-girlfriend. She wanted full custody & he wanted joint custody. She then leveled abuse allegations against him. The court then issued a penalty order which carried a hefty fine & admission of guilt. He rejected this & appealed for a closed door criminal trial to protect their daughter. He was not required to attend in person. During the trial, the ex-girlfriend gets questioned. The prosecution swiftly withdraws their case. He is awarded joint custody. She gets no money. The settlement covers court fees related to requesting the trial & is £250K less than the original penalty order. There is no ruling either way, thus his innocence is maintained throughout. Case closed.
We are innocent. It is the burden of the prosecution to prove otherwise beyond reasonable doubt using different levels of scrutiny (legal term) depending on the nature of the case (civil, criminal, Constitutional, etc.) Courts do not award custody rights to men lightly. The fact that he got joint custody, didn't have to appear in court, didn't have to pay her any money, & the prosecution withdrew after questioning her says a lot. He requested the trial, so of course he has to pay for those legal costs regardless of outcome.
You can't control what other people decide to do, only your response. He responded to the allegations by trusting the legal system to sort it out. Public opinion is not the same thing as due process. Recommended reading: The Oresteia. Law moves from a Chthonic form of justice to an Oronic one with dispassionate law eclipsing the emotion-based, retributive nature of The Furies. A classic from Greek antiquity essential to the legal system of the West.
Two unrelated women claiming he assaulted them, I think it's okay to draw your own conclusions :)
@@ChuppaChuck People can say what they want to say. Whether claims, allegations, etc. hold up in the court of law is a different matter.
Very well put. Are you a tennis fan and a legal fan or just smart?
@@graeme5060 Thanks, I suppose all three!
@got2bjosh it did hold up you genius. He was found guilty last October! This was an appeal.
1.The court says he's not guilty
2. Not even a penny from Sasha to his ex from this settlement
3. That's it. Everyone should move on and mind their own business now. Sorry the shit show is over find yourselves new hobbies
He was found guilty last October this was an appeal. Good God do your homework before you mindlessly comment.
The court's pecuniary penalty order was not a final verdict. An admission of guilt would've only been possible if he accepted the preliminary decision. Instead, a closed door criminal trial was held and the case against him was later withdrawn by the prosecution before cross-examination began. A settlement to pay court costs was reached and his innocence was maintained throughout the legal process.
I'm sorry but if you can put a price on your suffering and your pain as an abuse survivor then I question the legitimacy of the abuse.
Someone with integrity would not cash out she didn't do it for his benefit so that means the number was high enough that she could be bought.
I have a problem with that.
As someone who was raped repeatedly as a child and this was an alleged strangulation,
People wanting to throw Sasha to the wolves I'm sorry because he had an outburst on the tennis court doesn't make him an abuser.
The only people that know the truth are the two people involved and the fact that she was able to cash out to me ruins her credibility not his.
@@SScott-nr9vl She didn't receive any money. So where does that leave you with your argument?
@@artemisianwell5122 Yes, but she did have the option to pursue this case legally. The fact that she didn't take the legal route raises questions of whether or not she was really abused.
@@tarun_sanu It raises no questions for me
@@artemisianwell5122 You are free to think that, but from a legal point of view he will always be presumed innocent until he is proven guilty.
From what insiders say, Zverev's ex latched on to him early when his star began to rise. She issued her claim suddenly after he broke up with her and they were in a custody battle. Any expert will tell you that this is the number one scenario where false allegations are made between ex partners. Cross examination is the must truth determining part in any trial and she bailed at the time when she was going to be cross examined. That screams of someone who is lying. Zverev challenged the ruling and put himself at risk of prison time all in order to prove his innocence. He won in that the judgement against him was lifted and he didn't pay a dime to the [ex] in that regard. Infer what you will from these facts. Good luck in the finals Sascha!
Or he paid the guilty judgment from last year because he knew he was going to be found guilty. This is 2 women BTW that accused him. I guess you've never heard of a pattern.
@@maximilian2974 that judgement (without his participation) was NOT a settlement, and it was for 400k. He never paid a dime of that and this whole proceeding was him challenging that. He only paid for court fees and child stuff. Right when the ex was going to be cross examined (which is the most truth determining process) SHE decided to quit the case. That speaks volumes. As far as your 2 girlfriend stuff, we as a society know how those numbers work, it's so fake and all of a sudden. They all accuse after another bc it helps each of their plots. Blood sucking lawyers help coordinate this, obviously. Why don't we go and ask all the ex bfs of these women about them, and let's see how the numbers work then.
He did not pay the court's penalty order which was a preliminary decision. Instead, he appealed for a closed criminal trial. The case against him was subsequently withdrawn by the prosecution and a settlement to pay court costs was reached.
There's a lot of Amber2.0 there. And I can see that from this case as well. It's such a shame because it will tarnish his name forever. Xx
His personal life is none of my business, but I’m glad that Sascha can put this issue behind him. Now back to the tennis!