U.S. working to counter cheap Chinese exports

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 кві 2024
  • U.S. officials, from the president to the Treasury secretary, are accusing China of pushing cheap goods. Mark Wu, professor of law at Harvard University, joins CBS News to examine how low-priced Chinese products could impact American businesses, workers and the global economy.
    CBS News Streaming Network is the premier 24/7 anchored streaming news service from CBS News and Stations, available free to everyone with access to the Internet. The CBS News Streaming Network is your destination for breaking news, live events and original reporting locally, nationally and around the globe. Launched in November 2014 as CBSN, the CBS News Streaming Network is available live in 91 countries and on 30 digital platforms and apps, as well as on CBSNews.com and Paramount+.
    See more at cbsnews.com/prime-time-with-j...
    Subscribe to the CBS News UA-cam channel: / cbsnews
    Watch CBS News: cbsnews.com/live/
    Download the CBS News app: cbsnews.com/mobile/
    Follow CBS News on Instagram: / cbsnews
    Like CBS News on Facebook: / cbsnews
    Follow CBS News on Twitter: / cbsnews
    Subscribe to our newsletters: cbsnews.com/newsletters/
    Try Paramount+ free: paramountplus.com/home/?ftag=...
    For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 233

  • @mwqjdpk
    @mwqjdpk 13 днів тому +95

    Americans have every right to buy lousy yet expensive products made by their union workers.

    • @Dave05J
      @Dave05J 13 днів тому

      Chinese products are worse!

    • @danwelterweight4137
      @danwelterweight4137 13 днів тому +4

      Only 11% of all American workers are unionized.
      When American manufacturering was at it speak it was like 40%
      You destroyed the Unions and then shipped their jobs overseas.
      If the US actually protected its unions what happened to US manufacturering wouldn't have happened.

    • @wei270
      @wei270 8 днів тому +1

      @@danwelterweight4137 The moment the corps has the ability to move their production plants out of the country, is the moment the government lost their ability to protect the union. mobility is an advantage only the rich enjoys, and it is a powerful one.

    • @brotherbig4651
      @brotherbig4651 3 години тому

      @@wei270 The corps always have the ability.

  • @liamporter1137
    @liamporter1137 13 днів тому +87

    Based on US and Yellen logic, China should also tell US to tell Apple to produce fewer iPhone and Microsoft to reduce number of Windows licenses. Shocking that US can say such a thing. Does US and Yellen understand how business work?

    • @LanNguyen-vd4zt
      @LanNguyen-vd4zt 13 днів тому +3

      Chinese people so not used Microsoft licensing. 1 window license for every 200k laptop. All pirated

    • @JJJohnson441
      @JJJohnson441 13 днів тому

      Based on your statement, you don't know what logic is.

    • @Tdzzz450
      @Tdzzz450 12 днів тому +4

      Ban Apple asap

    • @LanNguyen-vd4zt
      @LanNguyen-vd4zt 12 днів тому

      @@Tdzzz450 need to ban your hair cut

    • @Tdzzz450
      @Tdzzz450 12 днів тому +4

      @@LanNguyen-vd4zt thanks for the advice vietcongbot

  • @user-ew5eh2co5p
    @user-ew5eh2co5p 13 днів тому +47

    There are no cheap Chinese imports. Only imports what Americans can afford.

  • @francoisguyot9770
    @francoisguyot9770 12 днів тому +32

    China did not produce cars a decade ago. BAck then, China could not compete against the US and EU. We would sell our cars at exorbitant prices, because we could not scale, and our labor and manufacturing was too expensive. So we went to china to exploit the huge Chinese market, lowering our prices by improving the scalability and cutting costs of production in labor supply chain as well as logistics. We made insane profits selling to China, who bought our cars for years without complaining, without jacking up tariffs... MOf course all we only allowed them to export cheap low quality stuffs.However the trade balance was still in their favor, because they produce in mass for Americans who loves cheap stuffs even if complaining about China's low quality. Now China caught up and make their own EV cars. They're super competitive, offering a range of prices and qualities that could easily allow us to start replacing our ICE cars and go green. But do we care about our citizens needs? Do do we even care about clean energy? US will never be able to produce our own EV cars - economically - Our labor is too high and our supply chain inexistant. So we just want to knee cap China, play nasty... even if it means shooting ourselves on the foot. Go figure America these days..? personally I can't !

  • @ghteo9766
    @ghteo9766 13 днів тому +98

    Among China's car production, only 15% are exported. As for German cars, 75% are sold to foreign countries. Why the US never call German car production overcapacity??

    • @bullpup1337
      @bullpup1337 13 днів тому +2

      because Germany respects WTO rulings

    • @franciscoduran74
      @franciscoduran74 13 днів тому

      ​@@bullpup1337 😒 for sure the west respects a lot of things, we know that...

    • @wilmeramadoraguilar47
      @wilmeramadoraguilar47 13 днів тому +24

      @@bullpup1337 Which ruling specifically?

    • @element2dd
      @element2dd 11 днів тому +14

      @@bullpup1337does US respect WTO rule?

    • @casawi1986
      @casawi1986 10 днів тому +6

      ​@@bullpup1337like ?

  • @michael511128
    @michael511128 13 днів тому +58

    Cheap Chinese goods are all Americans can afford or otherwise your Walmart wouldn’t place orders to have them made for you. Who are the sellers? Chinese or Americans? Use your head.

    • @williammurray1341
      @williammurray1341 13 днів тому +2

      Sam Walton started with a buy American ideal. Sadly, American producers couldn't or wouldn't compete with imports.

  • @tonyh7158
    @tonyh7158 13 днів тому +17

    Don't worry, American company will sell you a lot of over price 'made in USA' product and they will made a huge profit from that, who care the people are suffering.

  • @huanghermann5207
    @huanghermann5207 13 днів тому +49

    How much money does China have to print to subsidise all the products which the US accuses China have subsidised? China cannot print money as the US does.

    • @LanNguyen-vd4zt
      @LanNguyen-vd4zt 13 днів тому

      50 cent for your comment

    • @hasanpasha01
      @hasanpasha01 10 днів тому +4

      ​@@LanNguyen-vd4zt stop barking in every comment.

    • @LanNguyen-vd4zt
      @LanNguyen-vd4zt 10 днів тому +1

      @@hasanpasha01 who you ? Then let meet up in person, if you prefer that way

  • @milibibi2152
    @milibibi2152 13 днів тому +18

    Ban, threats and sanction that all the West can do... Why not trying to do better? Why not invest in education to have more ingineers?

    • @drk7016
      @drk7016 4 дні тому +1

      Invested money in Ukraine and Israel

  • @jazzman7167
    @jazzman7167 13 днів тому +50

    I need an inexpensive car, I don’t want an overpriced UAW clunker. You know cars that the middle class can’t afford.

    • @mariajones8304
      @mariajones8304 13 днів тому +3

      Plenty of cars here to choose from. What are you whining about? 😮

    • @marktrinidad7650
      @marktrinidad7650 13 днів тому +6

      @@mariajones8304 You high buddy?

    • @Coffeeholic1740
      @Coffeeholic1740 12 днів тому +1

      @@mariajones8304like which for example? The Detroit big 3 or the Korean junks?

  • @hyuxion
    @hyuxion 13 днів тому +38

    Those rich politicians clearly don’t under how average Americans live their lives, we all need affordable and good quality products!

  • @jonathangoodell1524
    @jonathangoodell1524 13 днів тому +24

    I own an ice company. Clearly small money not a government worry. But I can buy a brand new and great quality ice freezer and pay to ship all the way to California for $1840 American. Same product here $3450

    • @mariajones8304
      @mariajones8304 13 днів тому +1

      Going to have to support local businesses now. Better for you and USA.

    • @HafiZzZzZz
      @HafiZzZzZz 13 днів тому +6

      Every country out there should also support their own local companies instead of importing from USA, right ?

    • @vangpham2514
      @vangpham2514 13 днів тому +2

      @@mariajones8304 better said and done when it is not your money.

    • @soonpohtay4794
      @soonpohtay4794 12 днів тому +2

      @@mariajones8304are you willing to buy ice from him for 2times more?😂😂😂😂

    • @Drummer117
      @Drummer117 12 днів тому

      @@soonpohtay4794yes if it means people can breathe clean blue sky air and have green plants around.

  • @DistrustHumanz
    @DistrustHumanz 13 днів тому +55

    So, is capitalism bad now? Or is cheap stuff good when it's only made in the U.S.? Will the U.S. stop giving taxpayer-funded subsidies to its own private businesses that make inferior products?

    • @jefferyyounce5372
      @jefferyyounce5372 13 днів тому

      China gives subsidize to Chinese companies. Even the ones who peddle fentanyl to the USA.

    • @stevelundgren990
      @stevelundgren990 13 днів тому +5

      Thank you Chairman Xi.

    • @jeffrhorer1811
      @jeffrhorer1811 13 днів тому +2

      No thanks to Chinese vehicles.

    • @damham5689
      @damham5689 13 днів тому +8

      ​​@@jeffrhorer1811Buick, Volvo, and probably 60% of the parts in all cars are made in China. US mostly just assembled cars. Even Tesla uses a lot if Chinese parts. They even use BYD batteries in many of their cars.

    • @DW-op7ly
      @DW-op7ly 13 днів тому

      What most people don’t get?
      Is it is US multinationals making the lion share of those profits inflating the trade deficit between China to the USA
      Where Chinese companies mostly trade with their Belt and Road country partners these days
      These US multinationals are the ones sending you that junk
      These US multinationals are still using the same highly polluting labour intensive factories formula.
      As they were using more and more illegal labour smuggled in from South East Asia.
      Or more and more automation in their wholly owned factories in China these days
      These are the same companies who got those trump Corporate tax cuts you for sure cheered about
      Same companies based in China who derived 392 billion in sales into the Chinese domestic markets in 2018 when trump started his trade war
      Same companies averaging 20 to 40% of their earnings from China whose high flying stocks are in your 401k/Pensions
      Same companies who the American farmer and consumer were sacrificed. So the USA could try and get “more” or “better” access for the US multinationals, into those Chinese Domestic markets during the trade war
      Same companies whose HQ is in a North American city you can easily go stand outside and protest at….
      Why didn’t China pull the nuclear trade option and boot these US companies you might ask?
      They don’t believe in a zero sum game type of thinking
      As I can show you during the trade war.
      China didn’t pull out their big trade weapons, in fact they were lowering tariffs to most countries not raising them
      👇
      Trump’s ‘trade war’ with China won’t be so easy to win
      Having learned these value chain lessons, Beijing has worked hard to bring more of the high-value-adding parts of value chains into China, and to build hi-tech industries in which it can establish a globally competitive position.
      China has successfully done this in areas like high-speed trains (CRRC), digital telecoms networks (Huawei), drones (DJI) and hi-tech batteries (BYD).
      Trump’s team is not wrong to be worried about China’s competitive emergence here, and to target these new-tech sectors in the latest trade war sortie.
      But here’s the problem: China exports almost none of these new-tech products to the US, making US tariff threats meaningless. Rather, they go to developing economy markets - many embraced by the Belt and Road initiative - where China has succeeded in building a hi-tech, high-value brand reputation.
      As Trump’s team will quickly learn, the challenge of finding China’s pain points is bigger than expected: for a decade China’s priority has been to base growth on the domestic consumer economy and reduce reliance on the low-value-adding export processing industries (many of which are US- or Hong Kong-owned and concentrated in the Pearl River Delta)
      SCMP

  • @wentjen
    @wentjen 13 днів тому +17

    Cheap products means good news for all of us consumers in US. We should all thank China to make this possible instead. Don’t let the 1% makes you think otherwise!

  • @sunnychew905
    @sunnychew905 13 днів тому +14

    Ha ha he was stumped for a minute on How To answer that The west Is equally complicit on subsidizing its Key industries 😂😂

  • @jimkuan8493
    @jimkuan8493 13 днів тому +9

    I thought it was National Security ... have we changed the narrative?

  • @paulyi729
    @paulyi729 12 днів тому +5

    Professor of Law talks on technology issues?

  • @jeanlaikan8400
    @jeanlaikan8400 13 днів тому +19

    China should work to counter expensive US exports

  • @paulyi729
    @paulyi729 12 днів тому +7

    Cheap Chinese products? You should add cheap n excellent products.

  • @nmew6926
    @nmew6926 13 днів тому +14

    Cheaper products will allow people sufficient money left to pay rents. Otherwise more homeless on the streets

  • @binder666
    @binder666 13 днів тому +11

    What if American consumers *like* cheap Chinese goods? Limiting them would put Amazon out of business.

  • @marvinfok65
    @marvinfok65 13 днів тому +36

    US can continue to banned Chinese products, but people like us in Asia don't want to ban because it keeps our inflation low! US is exporting their inflation to the world while China is helping us to keep cost low!

  • @triple8331
    @triple8331 12 днів тому +7

    US getting desperate 🙄

  • @mwqjdpk
    @mwqjdpk 13 днів тому +16

    This anchor is very ignorant about China

  • @supremesoftware
    @supremesoftware 13 днів тому +20

    Let it go,. America. Nobody makes anything cheaper &. better than China, least of all, America.

  • @johnnywalker2870
    @johnnywalker2870 13 днів тому +7

    Hey US, keep up or get out of the way!

  • @Seven.Heavenly.Sins.666
    @Seven.Heavenly.Sins.666 12 днів тому +2

    Overcapacity = Overprinting of toilet papers.😂😅🤣😂🤣😅

  • @adamyami2902
    @adamyami2902 8 днів тому +2

    And the general public will be the ones paying the difference. 🎉

  • @Teting7484f
    @Teting7484f 13 днів тому +6

    What will amazon sell?

  • @JW-xr9kb
    @JW-xr9kb 11 днів тому +2

    China should investigate American’s cheap agriculture products

  • @teebone2157
    @teebone2157 11 днів тому +2

    If China can ship a product that's higher quality and cost less. I'm all for it. I'm tired of politicians and Washington in general, trying to keep prices high to benefit US corporations.

  • @truck-kun929
    @truck-kun929 13 днів тому +15

    Seems like China is subsidizing their economy rather than costly foreign wars. Good use of taxes.

    • @MSDGroup-ez6zk
      @MSDGroup-ez6zk 13 днів тому +4

      They don't subsidize. China and USA have different approaches on business. China like most east Asian countries want to sell their goods cheaper to get million customers while the USA concerns about large net profit with expensive goods. For people in the world, money spend is better less so they can put that money for investment. That's why the world loves China products. China helps people for saving.

  • @bobcat6751
    @bobcat6751 12 днів тому +2

    There is nothing wrong with investing! And successful investments benefit everyone as a whole! Notice how the US are NOT accusing China of "dumping" which is selling at below cost because they are not. From a economic and logic stand point China as a whole has to be making money at what they are selling if not where are they getting the money to keep funding new money losing projects like their 5G, Solar Panels, batteries, and now EV's. I understand they may be subsidizing the development of new projects with profits from their profitable mature products but that is just investing. In short I don't think the BYD or the solar panel you are buying off-the-shelf today are being sold to you at at lost, its R&D was subsidized during its development from profits from their previous projects but that is just INVESTING!

  • @peetymcfly8871
    @peetymcfly8871 11 днів тому +1

    It's infuriating to think about the colossal sums of money the U.S. government has squandered on wars and foreign aid, especially when considering the dire needs right here at home. If only they had prioritized subsidizing U.S. manufacturing companies and businesses, like China does, we could have tackled inflation head-on and reduced our reliance on foreign sources for essential goods and technologies. Instead, our tax dollars have been funneled into overseas conflicts and questionable international ventures, while American workers and industries struggle to compete in an increasingly challenging global economy. It's a shameful betrayal of the American people and a damning indictment of our government's misplaced priorities.

  • @samanthajones4877
    @samanthajones4877 9 днів тому +1

    We all need to complain about the over supply of US weapons and dollars.

  • @brotherbig4651
    @brotherbig4651 3 години тому

    I thought US people hate inflation? Now they are countering cheap and quality goods?

  • @FelipeLim-iu3bd
    @FelipeLim-iu3bd День тому +1

    OH BY PRINTING MORE GREENBUCKS...😝😝🤪😜

  • @meangreen6044
    @meangreen6044 13 днів тому +5

    Excellent news segment! I enjoy hearing about how foreign policies are impacting Americans

  • @Heterogeneity
    @Heterogeneity 13 днів тому +11

    So we are finally noticing the problem thirty years too late. 😂

    • @davidli9887
      @davidli9887 13 днів тому +1

      Wow after thirty years of enjoying cheap goods and better standards of living, US finally decided to embrace inflation. We have the king of logical reasoning here.

  • @shellysmith1037
    @shellysmith1037 13 днів тому +6

    doubtful that US actually is countering anything

  • @yapsiauwsoengie6507
    @yapsiauwsoengie6507 13 днів тому +5

    Yellen's brain is over capacity already

  • @pennypinchhomefinder7887
    @pennypinchhomefinder7887 10 днів тому +1

    I only buy Chinese products from amazon racist companies in us and loss prevention at stores ran me off

  • @3DNA_tech
    @3DNA_tech 13 днів тому +6

    Just spitballing here....
    Decoupling or de-risking is often floating in the news these days
    What is going on here and why?
    Does a managed economy have a structural competitive advantage?
    "Tendency for profits will be to fall towards zero"
    Is that what we see at play on the global market?
    Supply networks built by globalization undergo seismic disruption/reformation
    Geopolitical competition between market capitalism vs state subsidized
    Will capitalists deindustrialize their own countries if it means profit?
    It's not until those affected by De-Industrialization (De-I) mobilize politically
    Erect tariffs/trade barriers and make a strategic defense point against De-I
    That this conversation topic is even considered
    Conversely, subsidy yields high employment, industrialization, affordability
    Standards of living rising for the vast majority of the population
    But also overproduction and a dependency on foreign trade, precisely:
    Market capitalists profiting from globalization
    While looking the other way on De-I
    Is it ironic?
    Perhaps localized De-I caused by globalization is just a short time period
    A blip in digital transformation of the global economy at large.
    AI could usher in changes only dreamt upon in science-fiction
    We build an ever more robotic-automated industrialized
    Artificially-intelligent means of production, to serve us
    But may end up serving it.
    Fascinating theories underlying the interplay of economics and geopolitics
    Green Tech, Chips, E Cars, Steel, the list goes on

    • @sidimote
      @sidimote 13 днів тому

      "Does a managed economy have a structural competitive advantage?"
      Yes. That's why China has been thriving, and that's why... the US has been thriving. Stop believing the neoliberal propaganda in the media, the US doesn't do less protectionism or give less subsidies to its home companies than China does.
      What is the CHIPS and Science Act $280 BILLIONS subsidies, if not a managed protectionnist economy ? This is an obvious violation of WTO rules, but who cares ?

  • @FloatingCastle
    @FloatingCastle 13 днів тому +1

    They're countering all the exports and China has some high quality stuff.

  • @user-cy8zj9nd6q
    @user-cy8zj9nd6q 13 днів тому +2

    The US should get rid of unions so they can build stuff at a lower price

    • @teebone2157
      @teebone2157 11 днів тому

      Companies will still have to pay a wage that will supported workers living no way in hell.They're going to sit in those factories everyday for $11.An hour of building microchips no more slavery especially into days economy

  • @HelloWorld-hb7yt
    @HelloWorld-hb7yt 13 днів тому

    how?

  • @pluribus_unum
    @pluribus_unum 13 днів тому +12

    Instant landfill stuffing.

    • @DW-op7ly
      @DW-op7ly 13 днів тому

      What most people don’t get?
      Is it is US multinationals making the lion share of those profits inflating the trade deficit between China to the USA
      Where Chinese companies mostly trade with their Belt and Road country partners these days
      These US multinationals are the ones sending you that junk
      These US multinationals are still using the same highly polluting labour intensive factories formula.
      As they were using more and more illegal labour smuggled in from South East Asia.
      Or more and more automation in their wholly owned factories in China these days
      These are the same companies who got those trump Corporate tax cuts you for sure cheered about
      Same companies based in China who derived 392 billion in sales into the Chinese domestic markets in 2018 when trump started his trade war
      Same companies averaging 20 to 40% of their earnings from China whose high flying stocks are in your 401k/Pensions
      Same companies who the American farmer and consumer were sacrificed. So the USA could try and get “more” or “better” access for the US multinationals, into those Chinese Domestic markets during the trade war
      Same companies whose HQ is in a North American city you can easily go stand outside and protest at….
      Why didn’t China pull the nuclear trade option and boot these US companies you might ask?
      They don’t believe in a zero sum game type of thinking
      As I can show you during the trade war.
      China didn’t pull out their big trade weapons, in fact they were lowering tariffs to most countries not raising them
      👇
      Trump’s ‘trade war’ with China won’t be so easy to win
      Having learned these value chain lessons, Beijing has worked hard to bring more of the high-value-adding parts of value chains into China, and to build hi-tech industries in which it can establish a globally competitive position.
      China has successfully done this in areas like high-speed trains (CRRC), digital telecoms networks (Huawei), drones (DJI) and hi-tech batteries (BYD).
      Trump’s team is not wrong to be worried about China’s competitive emergence here, and to target these new-tech sectors in the latest trade war sortie.
      But here’s the problem: China exports almost none of these new-tech products to the US, making US tariff threats meaningless. Rather, they go to developing economy markets - many embraced by the Belt and Road initiative - where China has succeeded in building a hi-tech, high-value brand reputation.
      As Trump’s team will quickly learn, the challenge of finding China’s pain points is bigger than expected: for a decade China’s priority has been to base growth on the domestic consumer economy and reduce reliance on the low-value-adding export processing industries (many of which are US- or Hong Kong-owned and concentrated in the Pearl River Delta)
      SCMP

  • @hansolo8225
    @hansolo8225 13 днів тому +14

    Cheap products reduce prices for everyone!

    • @meangreen6044
      @meangreen6044 13 днів тому +2

      Except China mass produces cheap products that are also low quality. The lifetime of made in china products is very low, and is intentionally done to get repeat buyers who are drawn to the low cost but fail to realize they’ll be a loop of continuously buying the same thing, which is what China wants to boost their revenue

    • @DjDreyfuss
      @DjDreyfuss 13 днів тому +1

      idk about you but all the cheap crap from china is garbage and break easily. I would be ok if we stopped buying from them at all.

    • @DW-op7ly
      @DW-op7ly 13 днів тому

      What most people don’t get?
      Is it is US multinationals making the lion share of those profits inflating the trade deficit between China to the USA
      Where Chinese companies mostly trade with their Belt and Road country partners these days
      These US multinationals are the ones sending you that junk
      These US multinationals are still using the same highly polluting labour intensive factories formula.
      As they were using more and more illegal labour smuggled in from South East Asia.
      Or more and more automation in their wholly owned factories in China these days
      These are the same companies who got those trump Corporate tax cuts you for sure cheered about
      Same companies based in China who derived 392 billion in sales into the Chinese domestic markets in 2018 when trump started his trade war
      Same companies averaging 20 to 40% of their earnings from China whose high flying stocks are in your 401k/Pensions
      Same companies who the American farmer and consumer were sacrificed. So the USA could try and get “more” or “better” access for the US multinationals, into those Chinese Domestic markets during the trade war
      Same companies whose HQ is in a North American city you can easily go stand outside and protest at….
      Why didn’t China pull the nuclear trade option and boot these US companies you might ask?
      They don’t believe in a zero sum game type of thinking
      As I can show you during the trade war.
      China didn’t pull out their big trade weapons, in fact they were lowering tariffs to most countries not raising them
      👇
      Trump’s ‘trade war’ with China won’t be so easy to win
      Having learned these value chain lessons, Beijing has worked hard to bring more of the high-value-adding parts of value chains into China, and to build hi-tech industries in which it can establish a globally competitive position.
      China has successfully done this in areas like high-speed trains (CRRC), digital telecoms networks (Huawei), drones (DJI) and hi-tech batteries (BYD).
      Trump’s team is not wrong to be worried about China’s competitive emergence here, and to target these new-tech sectors in the latest trade war sortie.
      But here’s the problem: China exports almost none of these new-tech products to the US, making US tariff threats meaningless. Rather, they go to developing economy markets - many embraced by the Belt and Road initiative - where China has succeeded in building a hi-tech, high-value brand reputation.
      As Trump’s team will quickly learn, the challenge of finding China’s pain points is bigger than expected: for a decade China’s priority has been to base growth on the domestic consumer economy and reduce reliance on the low-value-adding export processing industries (many of which are US- or Hong Kong-owned and concentrated in the Pearl River Delta)
      SCMP

    • @Dave05J
      @Dave05J 13 днів тому +1

      And puts people in unemployment!

    • @hansolo8225
      @hansolo8225 13 днів тому +5

      @@Dave05J Protectionism is a form of social welfare where the consumer pays a tax in the form of higher prices to support the lifestyle of a domestic worker.

  • @richardrummage7830
    @richardrummage7830 12 днів тому +1

    Lol it's now a problem while this was promoted for decades

  • @teebone2157
    @teebone2157 11 днів тому

    I'm sorry, but United States. Citizens are dealing with a highly inflationary environment and if China has some cheap products that we can use daily, we need access to them. I'm tired of this b******* from my government.

  • @Bebraveonce
    @Bebraveonce 10 днів тому

    Not only cheap it’s toxic junk

  • @jackorange1882
    @jackorange1882 12 днів тому +7

    Alot of words & propaganda just to admit that America CANT compete. Sad

  • @isra3255
    @isra3255 5 днів тому

    Stop bringing those and put aranceles

  • @ronaldchua9712
    @ronaldchua9712 13 днів тому

    HOW TO COUNTER ??????????

  • @GotoHere
    @GotoHere 13 днів тому +1

    10% for the big guy.

  • @user-lr8zd6yl8m
    @user-lr8zd6yl8m 13 днів тому +14

    Nobody forced you to buy high quality products with low Price tag from China or you have the freedom to choose and to buy low price,low quality things from India.

  • @RacerX1971
    @RacerX1971 11 днів тому

    Why does she sound like Elmer Pud😂😂😂

  • @mrmustangman
    @mrmustangman 13 днів тому +1

    the place i work gets it's 2 inch lug screws from taiwan.... SMH 🤯 ....we use like 15,000 in 24 hours.!!!!

    • @tonyh7158
      @tonyh7158 13 днів тому

      Don't worry, In USA government mind, taiwan is not china.

  • @Steve-bw4oh
    @Steve-bw4oh 13 днів тому

    You mean cheap knockoffs that will fail and injure you...

  • @lostinmuzak
    @lostinmuzak 11 днів тому

    When you produce more than what’s needed you are unnecessarily worsening the climate issues.

  • @jacquelinesilvers5267
    @jacquelinesilvers5267 13 днів тому +2

    توهم

  • @casparcoaster1936
    @casparcoaster1936 10 днів тому

    Still can't believe Trump was the only guy to have the guts to impose tariffs...

  • @quencyhaynes2551
    @quencyhaynes2551 2 дні тому

    American and European can not compete at all

  • @pradanal.m.r.8276
    @pradanal.m.r.8276 11 днів тому

    Indonesia ask many times for investment for their battery industries but always being neglected. Batteries is about 30~40% of cost from any Renewable, be it EV, Solar, Wind... Now China has close the loop by dominating Indonesia baterry industry along with South Korean... I dont know a better word other than "stupid"

  • @amunra5330
    @amunra5330 12 днів тому

    So where will the US buy products?

    • @Drummer117
      @Drummer117 12 днів тому

      Hopefully from USA. But the government only seems to let us build high quality local stuff when we’re at war.

  • @richardrummage7830
    @richardrummage7830 12 днів тому

    Using your contrived logic then Merica over produces wheat, corn and rice so people should stop buying Merican grains😊. Who thinks like this? A child

  • @tristanx3508
    @tristanx3508 13 днів тому

    That's right. All American adult is so self-delusional to say that we ban all "cheap" Chinese hi tech product such as EV, computer, electronics, etc.

  • @marcionphilologos5367
    @marcionphilologos5367 12 днів тому

    hahahahahah. Is it louzy quality or state-subsidies?????? IT IS CAPITALISM.

  • @ckwong1533
    @ckwong1533 13 днів тому

    What happened to American competitive sprite 😢

  • @Coffeeholic1740
    @Coffeeholic1740 12 днів тому

    Oh yeah I’d like the inflation to get higher please

  • @Drummer117
    @Drummer117 12 днів тому

    Everyone would buy local produce if the price difference and wages weren’t wildly different. Non-profit, or greed induced wasteland?

  • @vincentto178
    @vincentto178 12 днів тому +1

    Nonsense

  • @samsamyiu
    @samsamyiu 7 днів тому

    Mr Wu. Aren’t you proud of China.

  • @jacobl5488
    @jacobl5488 13 днів тому

    cant wait for them CHINESE EVS!

  • @hakeemtheplace2959
    @hakeemtheplace2959 13 днів тому +1

    Lol gotcha.

  • @MillennialAngst
    @MillennialAngst 13 днів тому

    The West is against cheap Chinese goods in sectors higher up the value chain, not things that have historically been outsourced to China. The issue is also more about China offloading their overcapacity (which was done intentionally to prop up GDP) to foreign markets because domestic demand is so low. It’s a strategy fundamentally designed to devalue. And yes, national security is also one of the driving factors. As are human rights, especially the use of Uyghur forced labor.
    Everything China does these days has an insidious ulterior motive that seeks to undermine the West and its values.

    • @xfactor6099
      @xfactor6099 12 днів тому

      And the west doesn't do insidious things to harm the rest of the world?? Only now two can play the game.
      Now you see what the global south has been suffering in the hands of the USA

  • @tomsunuwar6940
    @tomsunuwar6940 10 днів тому

    Two tongues USA 🇺🇸 uk 🇬🇧 western 😂😂

  • @chetanjoshi2159
    @chetanjoshi2159 13 днів тому

    5th grade knows

  • @BuhodePiedra
    @BuhodePiedra 13 днів тому +2

    Just like with the cartels products, we’re willing buyers! Don’t hate the player, hate the game etc. if we would only not be addicted to bad drugs and cheap plastic chachkies, then all of our problems would be solved

  • @AsadAf-rs1mm
    @AsadAf-rs1mm 13 днів тому +2

    this is a what pat Buchanan talked 1996 and no body listen.

  • @roxbee97abc
    @roxbee97abc 13 днів тому +2

    Wow, how 🇺🇸survived during the cold war era without Cheap Chinese Goods. 🇨🇳, Stop posting spamming comments.

  • @ongsengfook
    @ongsengfook 12 днів тому

    US should be the next India.

  • @slayeroftrolls1200
    @slayeroftrolls1200 13 днів тому +2

    If only republicans understood money

    • @opinionated_take
      @opinionated_take 13 днів тому

      Why are conservative states in such better financial standing then their liberal counterparts? Why are wealthy and working Americans fleeing liberal states in record setting numbers?

    • @slayeroftrolls1200
      @slayeroftrolls1200 13 днів тому

      @@opinionated_take 9/10 of the biggest welfare states are red kiddo.

    • @Wolfcamp555
      @Wolfcamp555 13 днів тому

      Republican Money? Texas has its own currency. It's called the WTI Petro Dollar, backed by Black Gold. All the Red States use our currency.

    • @DW-op7ly
      @DW-op7ly 13 днів тому

      What most people don’t get?
      Is it is US multinationals making the lion share of those profits inflating the trade deficit between China to the USA
      Where Chinese companies mostly trade with their Belt and Road country partners these days
      These US multinationals are the ones sending you that junk
      These US multinationals are still using the same highly polluting labour intensive factories formula.
      As they were using more and more illegal labour smuggled in from South East Asia.
      Or more and more automation in their wholly owned factories in China these days
      These are the same companies who got those trump Corporate tax cuts you for sure cheered about
      Same companies based in China who derived 392 billion in sales into the Chinese domestic markets in 2018 when trump started his trade war
      Same companies averaging 20 to 40% of their earnings from China whose high flying stocks are in your 401k/Pensions
      Same companies who the American farmer and consumer were sacrificed. So the USA could try and get “more” or “better” access for the US multinationals, into those Chinese Domestic markets during the trade war
      Same companies whose HQ is in a North American city you can easily go stand outside and protest at….
      Why didn’t China pull the nuclear trade option and boot these US companies you might ask?
      They don’t believe in a zero sum game type of thinking
      As I can show you during the trade war.
      China didn’t pull out their big trade weapons, in fact they were lowering tariffs to most countries not raising them
      👇
      Trump’s ‘trade war’ with China won’t be so easy to win
      Having learned these value chain lessons, Beijing has worked hard to bring more of the high-value-adding parts of value chains into China, and to build hi-tech industries in which it can establish a globally competitive position.
      China has successfully done this in areas like high-speed trains (CRRC), digital telecoms networks (Huawei), drones (DJI) and hi-tech batteries (BYD).
      Trump’s team is not wrong to be worried about China’s competitive emergence here, and to target these new-tech sectors in the latest trade war sortie.
      But here’s the problem: China exports almost none of these new-tech products to the US, making US tariff threats meaningless. Rather, they go to developing economy markets - many embraced by the Belt and Road initiative - where China has succeeded in building a hi-tech, high-value brand reputation.
      As Trump’s team will quickly learn, the challenge of finding China’s pain points is bigger than expected: for a decade China’s priority has been to base growth on the domestic consumer economy and reduce reliance on the low-value-adding export processing industries (many of which are US- or Hong Kong-owned and concentrated in the Pearl River Delta)
      SCMP

    • @DW-op7ly
      @DW-op7ly 13 днів тому

      What most people don’t get?
      Is it is US multinationals making the lion share of those profits inflating the trade deficit between China to the USA
      Where Chinese companies mostly trade with their Belt and Road country partners these days
      These US multinationals are the ones sending you that junk
      These US multinationals are still using the same highly polluting labour intensive factories formula.
      As they were using more and more illegal labour smuggled in from South East Asia.
      Or more and more automation in their wholly owned factories in China these days
      These are the same companies who got those trump Corporate tax cuts you for sure cheered about
      Same companies based in China who derived 392 billion in sales into the Chinese domestic markets in 2018 when trump started his trade war
      Same companies averaging 20 to 40% of their earnings from China whose high flying stocks are in your 401k/Pensions
      Same companies who the American farmer and consumer were sacrificed. So the USA could try and get “more” or “better” access for the US multinationals, into those Chinese Domestic markets during the trade war
      Same companies whose HQ is in a North American city you can easily go stand outside and protest at….
      Why didn’t China pull the nuclear trade option and boot these US companies you might ask?
      They don’t believe in a zero sum game type of thinking
      As I can show you during the trade war.
      China didn’t pull out their big trade weapons, in fact they were lowering tariffs to most countries not raising them
      👇
      Trump’s ‘trade war’ with China won’t be so easy to win
      Having learned these value chain lessons, Beijing has worked hard to bring more of the high-value-adding parts of value chains into China, and to build hi-tech industries in which it can establish a globally competitive position.
      China has successfully done this in areas like high-speed trains (CRRC), digital telecoms networks (Huawei), drones (DJI) and hi-tech batteries (BYD).
      Trump’s team is not wrong to be worried about China’s competitive emergence here, and to target these new-tech sectors in the latest trade war sortie.
      But here’s the problem: China exports almost none of these new-tech products to the US, making US tariff threats meaningless. Rather, they go to developing economy markets - many embraced by the Belt and Road initiative - where China has succeeded in building a hi-tech, high-value brand reputation.
      As Trump’s team will quickly learn, the challenge of finding China’s pain points is bigger than expected: for a decade China’s priority has been to base growth on the domestic consumer economy and reduce reliance on the low-value-adding export processing industries (many of which are US- or Hong Kong-owned and concentrated in the Pearl River Delta)
      SCMP

  • @1611_KJV
    @1611_KJV 12 днів тому

    Rom 3:23
    For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
    Rom 6:23
    For the wages of sin is death;
    Psalms 9:17
    The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.
    Acts 8:37
    And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.
    Rom 10:9
    That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
    Corinthians 15:3-4
    For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
    Ephesians 2:8-9
    For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.
    .
    .
    .
    ''''😮

  • @bobcob3362
    @bobcob3362 13 днів тому +2

    So, bringing back trump policies?

  • @katateo328
    @katateo328 9 днів тому

    hahaha, chu sam vua muon an ngon lai vua muon ia thom nua ha DDD chu sam dang sang tao ra cong nghe sieu pham ha ta DDD

  • @cruzfairfield3326
    @cruzfairfield3326 13 днів тому

    The lack of news about how china has concentration camps and is using the people in them as slaves is so disconcerting

    • @tannen3339
      @tannen3339 13 днів тому +1

      based china, based german methods

    • @xfactor6099
      @xfactor6099 12 днів тому +3

      🤣🤣. American propaganda

  • @jeffrhorer1811
    @jeffrhorer1811 13 днів тому +4

    I would never buy a Chinese car or motorcycle/ scooter / electric bicycle.

    • @davidli9887
      @davidli9887 13 днів тому +9

      People said the same about Japanese cars 40 years ago.

    • @Jennifer-xg3iq
      @Jennifer-xg3iq 13 днів тому +6

      Don't worry, Chinese cars are for smart people 😅

    • @lifeisgood141
      @lifeisgood141 13 днів тому +3

      And the world cares about what you like or not like.

    • @christopersambeli2823
      @christopersambeli2823 13 днів тому +2

      your missing out then😂

    • @DW-op7ly
      @DW-op7ly 13 днів тому

      What most people don’t get?
      Is it is US multinationals making the lion share of those profits inflating the trade deficit between China to the USA
      Where Chinese companies mostly trade with their Belt and Road country partners these days
      These US multinationals are the ones sending you that junk
      These US multinationals are still using the same highly polluting labour intensive factories formula.
      As they were using more and more illegal labour smuggled in from South East Asia.
      Or more and more automation in their wholly owned factories in China these days
      These are the same companies who got those trump Corporate tax cuts you for sure cheered about
      Same companies based in China who derived 392 billion in sales into the Chinese domestic markets in 2018 when trump started his trade war
      Same companies averaging 20 to 40% of their earnings from China whose high flying stocks are in your 401k/Pensions
      Same companies who the American farmer and consumer were sacrificed. So the USA could try and get “more” or “better” access for the US multinationals, into those Chinese Domestic markets during the trade war
      Same companies whose HQ is in a North American city you can easily go stand outside and protest at….
      Why didn’t China pull the nuclear trade option and boot these US companies you might ask?
      They don’t believe in a zero sum game type of thinking
      As I can show you during the trade war.
      China didn’t pull out their big trade weapons, in fact they were lowering tariffs to most countries not raising them
      👇
      Trump’s ‘trade war’ with China won’t be so easy to win
      Having learned these value chain lessons, Beijing has worked hard to bring more of the high-value-adding parts of value chains into China, and to build hi-tech industries in which it can establish a globally competitive position.
      China has successfully done this in areas like high-speed trains (CRRC), digital telecoms networks (Huawei), drones (DJI) and hi-tech batteries (BYD).
      Trump’s team is not wrong to be worried about China’s competitive emergence here, and to target these new-tech sectors in the latest trade war sortie.
      But here’s the problem: China exports almost none of these new-tech products to the US, making US tariff threats meaningless. Rather, they go to developing economy markets - many embraced by the Belt and Road initiative - where China has succeeded in building a hi-tech, high-value brand reputation.
      As Trump’s team will quickly learn, the challenge of finding China’s pain points is bigger than expected: for a decade China’s priority has been to base growth on the domestic consumer economy and reduce reliance on the low-value-adding export processing industries (many of which are US- or Hong Kong-owned and concentrated in the Pearl River Delta)
      SCMP