Could this actually be the location of ATLANTIS? (Richat Structure)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
  • Could this be where the lost city of Atlantis has be located and hiding all these years?
    The Richat structure has a lot of compelling similarities when compared to Plato's description of the Lost City of Atlantis. Could this actually be the location of Atlantis all along? hiding in plain sight in the middle of the Sahara Desert. Not the most likely of places when its supposed to be sunken underwater but there is a lot of compelling evidence to change that theory.
    #atlantis #richatstructure #ancienthistory

КОМЕНТАРІ • 111

  • @Gavriel-og6jv
    @Gavriel-og6jv 2 роки тому +12

    7:10 Because somebody still has to go there and excavate through tons of debris, sand and rests of magma, to see if there is any remains of a city, like ancient construction buildings and human elements and tools. That, of course, when the government of Mauritania allows it.

  • @MWolfe1080
    @MWolfe1080 2 роки тому +9

    Plato was not a proponent for telling myths as a form of entertainment. He did use allegories to explain deeper philosophical principles. However when Plato did use one of these allegorical mediums such as “the Cave” and “the ring of Gyges” they are without a doubt allegories. However let’s hypothetically say Plato is using Atlantis as an allegory. Why did he go into such extreme detail about the city’s location, the route the Atlantian army took to Greece, the animals that were native to the Atlantis, the mineral wealth of Atlantis, (which ironically is consistent with its current composition) geothermal heating of water and where the main source of fresh water came from out of the center. (which again is is ironically consistent with the modern day remains of the Richat Structure. Never mind the Egyptian text that claims they once were once a province of Atlantis. Troy was a myth, Agor Watt was a myth, Xanadu was just a myth, but then someone swam against the current scientific community and found them. Now they are just part of our history, and there are more than 25 lost cities that have been discovered in the past century alone.

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  2 роки тому

      Well said and totally agree

    • @MWolfe1080
      @MWolfe1080 2 роки тому

      Hey man, I don’t know if you want to read a bit more, but I actually wrote a graduate thesis on this hypothesis back in 2009. It was published in the AJA. Let me know and I’ll send it to you.

    • @cassiel11175
      @cassiel11175 Рік тому +1

      ​@@MWolfe1080 I'd love to read it!!!

  • @antoinepinnock1777
    @antoinepinnock1777 2 роки тому +11

    You do know that the mid Atlantic ridge is pushing the entire western section of the African continent upwards by 2.5 centimeters every year, which is why there are 2 rift valley all along the entire eastern section of the African continent and is why the richat structure is now 500 meters above sea level now, rather than being main feature of the coastline ... 12000 years ago it would have been at the coastline

  • @UTock
    @UTock 2 роки тому +9

    The desert was a jungle 12000 years ago and yes anything that was there would be completely gone by now this is the best evidence for the existence of Atlantis

    • @ajgunter8932
      @ajgunter8932 Рік тому

      nope

    • @SeanOptimoa
      @SeanOptimoa 8 місяців тому +1

      @@ajgunter8932
      It literally was. Theory or not it was PROVEN that the desert in Africa was a jungle. This is now known fact.

  • @TheLucifer92
    @TheLucifer92 2 роки тому +21

    I am obsessed with this theory for a few years now, glad you covered it. It's almost obvious that it was there, or at least something strange was.... Especially when you zoom out the map, you can see huge marks coming from the ocean, like something smudged the whole land mass, from far away it looks like a mud smudge on some shore...

    • @avidfather1864
      @avidfather1864 2 роки тому +1

      Let me tell you something. For one, Atlantis is and always was a myth. It never existed. And second, outside if the round, circular structures, which are a broad similarity, nothing concerning the eye of the Sahara actually matches Plato's description of Atlantis. It's not even an island.

    • @henrymonroe4300
      @henrymonroe4300 Рік тому +1

      @@avidfather1864 they said the same thing about the Trojan war heh 12k years ago that city was an island - ice melt on the NA continent caused a shift in elevation in the Atlantic and the meltwaturned to the sea, raising water level and flooding the lowland of Western Africa (from the Mediterranean south to the Atlantic, following the path of least resistance directly the the rishat

    • @ajgunter8932
      @ajgunter8932 Рік тому

      @@henrymonroe4300 there is so much wrong in that...fail

    • @SeanOptimoa
      @SeanOptimoa 8 місяців тому

      The marks are not coming "from" the ocean but rather into the ocean.
      It makes sense once you realize over 100 cultures around the world have different stories of a flood.

  • @caseylyles3104
    @caseylyles3104 2 роки тому +5

    There's a map of platos journey that shows Atlantis illustrated where the eye is. Also plato documented islands due west from the eye. About 200 miles off the coast. Now the islands are mostly gone. Ive heard that the cataclysmic event was there and washed sand east. Just my two pennies. Great topic

  • @SilverOasisPublishing
    @SilverOasisPublishing Рік тому +1

    Old maps suggest a city of Atlas where the Richat Structure currently is. A map made by Sebastian Münster (1554) shows Atlas, a map made by Willem Janszoon Blaeu (1644) also shows Atlas; Herman Moll (1732) shows "The Atlas"; Johann Matthia Hase (1737) shows Atlas; John Cary (1805) shows Atlas; J Andriveau-Goujon (1856) shows Atlas; E Andriveau-Goujon (1880) shows Atlas... however modern day maps do not. Perhaps it was a local government covering up ancient history and one hundred years later, we've all forgotten about the lost city that no longer shows up.

  • @Gavriel-og6jv
    @Gavriel-og6jv 2 роки тому +3

    I like the fact that you said "IF this was the location of Atlantis" and did not go to bombard us with all kinds of insinuations that it really is (like Jimmy, bright insight does). Only for this I am subscribing.

  • @captaindavejseddon8788
    @captaindavejseddon8788 Рік тому +2

    Considering it is south of the Atlas Mountains and the King of Atlantis was Atlas, I think you can safely say that this structure IS Atlantis. Also the amount of red rock debris laying around, which will be left overs from buildings. Good Video, keep up the good work. :)

  • @rhammond2152
    @rhammond2152 2 роки тому +5

    So, to add to the Africa mystery element....google-up on the map 'Tsodilo Hills' (Botswana). Turn on the imagery, and pull out about 40 miles in all four directions. Notice the 'ripples' (canals). All lead to a delta area to the east. Canals are straight....not a natural situation....have to be man-made. Area is probably half the size of Arizona.

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  2 роки тому

      oh that's super interesting, will definitely look into that! thanks for the tip

  • @iainpattison903
    @iainpattison903 Рік тому +2

    It was NOT Jimmy of Bright Insight who discovered that the Richat Structure was the lost City of Atlantis, it was George S Alexander & Natalis Rosen who discovered this.

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  Рік тому

      Did not know that, I just saw Jimmys video. Thanks for the clarification

  • @sonpacho
    @sonpacho 11 місяців тому +1

    I'm not into this subject matter so I might be wrong but I noticed something...
    How old is Gobleki Tepe? Isn't that considered the oldest known megalith structure?
    After watching this video, I wondered why there were no buildings/structures left, if it was Atlantis, since megalith construction was known.
    What if the construction of megaliths (Gobleki Tepe, Pyramids, etc) was in response to the cataclysm? They didn't have megaliths because nothing like that had ever happened before. Even in modern times a major weather/geological event can/will change the way buildings are constructed. What if that is what happened?
    It seems like the dates match.
    A thousand years after civilization destroying floods people started flood proofing their constructions.
    I could be wrong, it was just an observation.

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  11 місяців тому +1

      No idead if this is right or wrong but these thought provoking questions are what im after! Really interesting theory. Would be cool to look into it more

  • @Gustav4
    @Gustav4 Рік тому +1

    Atlantis is underwater, to find it we gotta look at the prehistoric coast line that are shown on the maps made 12500 years ago. The depth of Atlantis would probably be around 120 meters down.

  • @ajgunter8932
    @ajgunter8932 Рік тому +2

    Im a Geologist and this "theory" is the worst sort of pseudoscience nonsense. Plato made up the story after hearing about Santorini and the Minoans

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  Рік тому +2

      Could you elaborate more on your answer?, im curious and if something is missed or doesnt add up, then im all for more info. But you cant really make a statement like that and not explain yourself 😉 Its like if i say “im an engineer and the eiffel tower is horribly designed” but dont back it.

    • @ajgunter8932
      @ajgunter8932 Рік тому

      @@dansedran I guess I did kind of diverge there. My apologies. The richat structure is too far and too high in elevation to ever have been in the Atlantic. If that much of Africa had risen out of the sea at that time it would have left much more evidence. The way it looks like sand has flown over western Africa is because it blew on the wind from the east. The sand there is very fine and blows long distances. There are satellite pictures of dust storms leaving moving east to West and out over the Atlantic right where the patterns of sand line up.

    • @eliembys-davidson890
      @eliembys-davidson890 7 місяців тому

      What if the salt residue there really can be explained by wind carrying salt, but... Atlantis really was where the richat structure is, and instead of being surrounded by ocean it was actually surrounded by a very wide river.

    • @ajgunter8932
      @ajgunter8932 7 місяців тому

      @@eliembys-davidson890 there would be evidence of a river channel. Smooth, rounded stones, ripple marks, gravel beds, etc.

    • @Beauzesta
      @Beauzesta 6 місяців тому

      Are the emerald tablets real?

  • @REVIEWSONTHERUN
    @REVIEWSONTHERUN 2 роки тому +2

    Interesting! Thank you for sharing it. ✌️

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  2 роки тому

      Interesting topic to think about for sure! Thanks for watching 🙏

  • @change9929
    @change9929 Рік тому +1

    Refer to mudfossils University too.
    Superimpose the eye of Horus symbol on it.
    The atlantean city builders found this structure and built their city on it.Otherwise,no architect would make a circular town plan.

  • @edwardanthony7283
    @edwardanthony7283 Рік тому +1

    Roger Spurr at mud fossil university went into even deeper detail of the structure in his videos.

  • @dentonthomas5622
    @dentonthomas5622 Рік тому +2

    This area needs lidar and ground penetrating radar performed on it. Something has to be there besides rubble. Walls. Bases of columns. Streets. Heads of statues. Ancient writing and artwork. It has to be there.

  • @justinhobart8747
    @justinhobart8747 Рік тому +1

    To understand the Atlantis story, you must dive into the times of the ancient Greek the Latin language of the story and the knowledge of the world back then the earth was flat back... The story says the pillars of Hercules... Where are those pillars? Some say it's the straights of Gibraltar, But there's also some evidence that Hercules was African man, so... Some say Atlantic ocean however what does ocean translate in Latin. Latin word for ocean was "oceanus", in Greek mythology, it was the river that flowed around the Earth (conceived as flat). Well that fact the Atlantic ocean didn't even exist back then it was called the Atlantic sea. In fact the Atlantic ocean was broken up into several seas, some which that just came off the map a few hundred years ago, like the Aethiopian or Ethiopian Ocean, the Atlantic ocean that was South of the equator that is. On that fact there is a map of Africa from 1554, That actually has a kingdom labeled Atlas on the map. 😲 Still today's map You find a city called Ifrane Atlas-Saghir in the same area, along with the fact there is Atlas mountains... still to this day. The map points out other mythical locations like Monoculi where the tribe of one eye giants supposedly lived. Sounds very plausible to me that the city is real. Sounds also very plausible to me that the city is in Africa. Some say Africa how is that possible it says It's on an island in the Atlantic well again look at what the language of the time again. You also must realize Africa was a completely different place back then... Lots of rivers and Great Lake... Was a very wet tropical environment.

  • @sxphaa
    @sxphaa 2 роки тому +2

    Nice video bro

  • @jennitalia_925
    @jennitalia_925 2 місяці тому

    I think it’s very possible.Would love to see more testing in the area. A ground penetrating radar to see if there’s anything remaining underground. If they had technology and irrigation systems a head of their time some evidence of this could be left behind.

  • @jessiejunio3046
    @jessiejunio3046 6 місяців тому

    It's in Philippines in Asea.. the location is one of the Bay in Philippines.and the instructure.. Is near at the Sea..

  • @amandalouise9046
    @amandalouise9046 2 роки тому +1

    If this was Atlantis then can you imagine the level of engineering and complex building materials required, they would have to have been more advanced than the Egyptians. They should dig there😀

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  2 роки тому

      They should definitely dig. People have tried but funding and its location are the issue, no one wants to fund a dig and its really remote so getting there is another problem in itself. One day they might

  • @edwardanthony7283
    @edwardanthony7283 Рік тому +1

    They need to dig down 100 feet & Mauritania is very strict & won't permit it. Imprint settling.

  • @abbyzahugmonster471
    @abbyzahugmonster471 Рік тому +1

    It was totally real, but it’s so old it’s all gone.

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  Рік тому

      I feel the same way. But then again, the city of troy was a myth, until it was found

  • @Mortismors
    @Mortismors Рік тому +1

    Have you seen the Google Earth pics that show outlines of structures that once were on the Richat?

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  Рік тому

      I have not! But i will check that out!

  • @marjhuncantago9476
    @marjhuncantago9476 Рік тому +2

    WILLING TO EXCAVATE THE PLACE! and TERRAFORM IT.

  • @UTock
    @UTock 2 роки тому +1

    If the Egyptians said it existed then 100% it existed

  • @richardwarnock2789
    @richardwarnock2789 Рік тому +1

    Found the arch it's been under control now it was 50 years ago shape is a giant A it's only 1 part the other is 3,000 miles from that!

  • @czatron
    @czatron 2 роки тому +13

    Yes! The eye of the Sahara ! Atlantis !

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  2 роки тому +1

      Theres so much compelling evidence for this spot!

  • @Gavriel-og6jv
    @Gavriel-og6jv Рік тому +1

    Has anybody here checked out the Ampèr Seamount right at the opening of Spain and Morocco under the Atlantic ocean? the Russians went with a submersible there and took pictures of man-made structures all over, not made very open to the public though. It just fits the description of out of the pillars given by Plato.

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  Рік тому +1

      is there anywhere to view these pictures? would love to look into this more

    • @Gavriel-og6jv
      @Gavriel-og6jv Рік тому

      @@dansedran I have looked all over the internet but I could only find an opaque, black and white picture from a newspaper that does not show pretty much anything. One can definitely zoom in the ocean view on Google Earth and you can tell there are definitely rectangular-shape structures down there.

  • @fatjeezus420
    @fatjeezus420 Рік тому +1

    I fully believe this is Atlantis. The reason the structures are gone is the different types of erosion and the materials they used to build their city with. Just the description of it sounds so much like this structure.

  • @drb369
    @drb369 2 роки тому +1

    Read the Emerald Tablets of Thoth the Atlantean. I don’t know if its for real or not but they’re worth reading if you’re interested

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  2 роки тому

      Thanks for the reccomendation, I’ll definitely check them out!

  • @cristianspinelli4753
    @cristianspinelli4753 Рік тому +1

    according to Chan Thomas in his book, Adam and Eve Story, he resembles the fact on not only the meteore hit earth's surface but on this possibility (or a trade in the poles x equator planetary's position) the Earth has slowed down as much as possible for the wind and the oceans to continue its natural rotation meanwhile the land almost stopped, occuring the major instantaneous flood all over the planet, Africa included... reason why the water washing marks ans remains of salt there... it all makes lots of sense

  • @stellybrah
    @stellybrah 2 роки тому +1

    Check out Poverty Point in Louisiana. Just went there recently and you’ll be surprised at what you fine!

  • @dannyhernandez1212
    @dannyhernandez1212 Рік тому

    Two major problems, the location is all wrong and no one else ever talks about Atlantis.

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  Рік тому +1

      Care to elaborate? Theres a bunch of possible locations but where would you think the location is? Also, lots of people talk about atlantis

    • @dannyhernandez1212
      @dannyhernandez1212 Рік тому

      @@dansedran Plato (through the character Critias in his dialogues) describes Atlantis as an island larger than Libya and Asia Minor put together, located in the Atlantic just beyond the Pillars of Hercules-generally assumed to mean the Strait of Gibraltar

  • @izzynunyabeezwax8996
    @izzynunyabeezwax8996 Рік тому +1

    Atllantis will arise again when the last world war breaks out i believe

  • @ROHINIX-XZAAR
    @ROHINIX-XZAAR 25 днів тому

    Bro wtf you know that it is found in the Sahara desert and how far Atlantis is?

  • @johnsaxer3458
    @johnsaxer3458 7 місяців тому

    Ricshad structure is wrong as itis 20 times bigger than Atlantis.

  • @edwardanthony7283
    @edwardanthony7283 Рік тому +1

    Look at the giant fish & the dragon attacking the upper fin in NW Africa on google earth.

  • @LatterRainMessenger
    @LatterRainMessenger Рік тому +1

    The flood of Noah. Look into the Bible folks

  • @Megamaxx280
    @Megamaxx280 2 роки тому +2

    I do on land next to the sea

  • @Liltattyy
    @Liltattyy 2 роки тому +1

    I heard Lake Erie lol

  • @kevindina
    @kevindina 2 роки тому +3

    There is a region called kumari kandam.. Which could be a good candidate of being Atlantis.. Rather than Richat area.. It's a place which got sunken in sea and a civilization was lost. It was well documented in ancient literatures of India.. But there is no scientific proof yet.. It's a continent level land mass got sunken due to a big tsunami n earthquake according to the ancient literatures.. There is high chance egypt ppl know abt this.. As they do know about the civilization of ancient India..

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  2 роки тому

      Really interesting! Definitely gotta look into this!

    • @Mamahabu
      @Mamahabu 2 роки тому

      All I could find was that this Kumari Kandam is purely Mythical.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kumari_Kandam

  • @sabelsalvador3288
    @sabelsalvador3288 2 роки тому +1

    I do believe in Atlantis. But I don't we can still find it. Like you said before, the place must be decayed or maybe Atlantis was hidden somewhere where we can't be foind. Maybe.... 😊

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  2 роки тому

      Its definitely fun to think about, theres a lot of compelling evidense but at the same time we have no idea lol

  • @johnnwabuforudemezue1108
    @johnnwabuforudemezue1108 Рік тому +1

    Its Atlantis

  • @bennabiermoci3065
    @bennabiermoci3065 2 роки тому +1

    See the book of Enoch. A mind scrambler from the premises science makes about time clouds the solving of these mysteries. We who love the Lord Yahweh rest in a 5th dimensional spirit and keep to the scriptures that have simple truth as their foundation. 6000 years ago the earth was void and empty (emptied) from a previous age. Plato studied the remnant of knowledge and concluded what approximated but can not 'know (intimate knowledge) because he was a man who was fallen as Adam. But our Elohim and the multi-dimensional realm knows and understands (Sees) all this as clearly as we see ourselves in a mirror. We see the reflection but there is much more beneath the image. Our obedience is to the first commandment which results in our being restored to The Original Covenant, the prefall condition which is 'Born again". To him who has an ear; Selah

  • @tims8603
    @tims8603 Рік тому +1

    I was intrigued by this hypothesis a few years ago. However, Randall Carlson has pointed out that the measurements don't work. The Richat structure is too big to be the Capitol city of Atlantis. He gives good evidence that Atlantis was probably in the Azores. Parts of the Azores were above water in the glacial maximum. He is also a proponent of the cosmic impact hypothesis near the end of the glacial maximum that caused massive tsunamis and rapid melting of the glaciers.

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  Рік тому

      Ive heard a little bit of his points and they definitely do make sense. Theres good compelling points from both sides, and Im open to all possibilities. This one was one of the more compelling arguments but I definitely have to look into Randall’s explanation more

    • @tims8603
      @tims8603 Рік тому

      @@dansedran He also suggests that there might be a connection between the islands in the Azores and the west coast of Africa. Evidently, Atlantis was a sort of empire.

  • @PeterHalliday187
    @PeterHalliday187 2 роки тому +1

    There is 4 Rings at the richat not 3 and it is not Atlantis

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  2 роки тому

      Where are you seeing the forth ring? Unless you're counting the perimeter? Either way we may never know if it was or not but you gotta admit there's some interesting coincidences. Thanks for watching ✌️

    • @PeterHalliday187
      @PeterHalliday187 2 роки тому +1

      @@dansedran Hello my friend, here is the link to someone who has explained all the holes in the Richat structure theory, I am giving you the link to part one there is two parts, here is the link ua-cam.com/video/BqhMGVLUSB0/v-deo.html
      Please enjoy
      Thank you and Kind regards Peter Halliday

    • @PeterHalliday187
      @PeterHalliday187 2 роки тому +1

      @@dansedran Hello mate did you watch the link I sent you?

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  2 роки тому +1

      @@PeterHalliday187 Just getting to this now but very interested to see this video, and will watch it shortly! thanks for the link!

    • @PeterHalliday187
      @PeterHalliday187 2 роки тому

      @@dansedran Hello mate did you watch the link that I sent you, if you would like to see the Real Atlantis with the Rings still intact and Matching Platos Atlantis exactly, here is the link ua-cam.com/video/1d_mAS4DCLU/v-deo.html
      Please enjoy
      Thank you and Kind regards Peter Halliday

  • @JagannathaSuta
    @JagannathaSuta 2 роки тому +1

    Yes, Atlantis is real, but the technology of this culture enabled them to fly the city off of Planet Earth, they are on a different planet waiting for the current polluted age to pass.

  • @alkavyas6288
    @alkavyas6288 Рік тому

    it is real obviously 😂😂

  • @Null778
    @Null778 2 роки тому +1

    Doesn’t this make you question global warming. If all ice melted, there would water in the Sahara.

  • @jackwasley5079
    @jackwasley5079 2 роки тому +1

    I think Atlantis is real, somewhere in the ocean

  • @mariogaray2361
    @mariogaray2361 2 роки тому +1

    No!! Atlantis is in spain!! Tartessos was built on what was once atlantis. Makes more sense trust me! Go look at wayne herschels theory on it at his website the hidden records
    Jimmy from brightside can suck it!! He didnt find shit he just Watched a video and now people claim he found atlantis.

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran  2 роки тому

      I will definitely check out Waynes theory! thanks for the tip.

  • @dfkw7385
    @dfkw7385 Рік тому +1

    They said Troy was a meth and they found it