I think its like "fillers" that's y they keep on saying y'now or they just think of words to say , maybe they are also running out of words. There are some instances im also like that.
Listen to the Paul McCartney BBC 1966 interview on UA-cam. He also says 'you know' at the end of each sentence. And this was 1966 before Paul apparently died in a car crash according to you Paul is dead believers
@@Dingoplexor Yes! Besides the forensic evidence: fake Paul is two inches taller, has green eyes, as a longer face, and if you are a true fan of Paul McCartney: Paul had a sweetness in his eyes, the sweetness of his gentle soul. The fake Paul never ever had that sweetness in his eyes. Eyes are the windows of the Soul.
Irrespective of who says it, it is an absurd, irritating expression. When people use this phrase when talking to me, I think to myself, "I don't know, because you are telling me" - unless they are confirming what I actually did know. I believe that YOU KNOW is a shorter version of "You Know what I mean", which makes a little more sense.
@@ryanpatrickwhite97 Paul was always this strange. Look at the very first filmed Beatles performance. He was always staring up at the wall like he was spastic.
Just six months before Paul was ending the shows with Long Tall Sally. The transformation was from 1965 to 1967 was one of the most shocking and incredible transformations in pop music history.
@Forensic Files: Paul is Dead, Knowledge is Power this goes for everyone in show business. Many transgendered people have played the role of " paul McCartney ". He is a character with a backstory, not a real person. Many people dont know anything about how show business works.then they think you're mental for telling the truth. What about brown eyed paul on " let it be", or short paul on the 1963 swedish tv show. Not to mention the raspy voice taller paul on the help movie.
@@thepossessor The realization that you are not your body/ego and that we are all the universe playing a game with itself, and this body is only a vehicle for that. And spirituality for me is practicing that detachment from the body and ego and applying that to your life, I believe that by doing this, your mind can run limitless and free and it can become an antena for awesome ideas, music and art in general.. I think Paul really knows, I can feel it in the joy of his music
@@thepossessor I also think that the Beatles taking LSD really changed them, their music became d e e p e r , a universe in itself! That is what I believe made the big/shocking transformation
MY GOD! Paul didn't have a moustache before 1967, it MUST be a different person! He's wearing different clothes as well! I must say, the man who replaced him did a good job by writing songs such as Hey Jude, Penny Lane, Lady Madonna, Let It Be, She's Leaving Home, Helter Skelter etc etc, and replicating exactly McCartney's mannerisms, accent, dialect and intonation, bass-playing style and personality. And it was also a stroke of luck that he looked exactly like him!
Here you listen here in only saying if he is dead you also have to give the guys respect and think about what his sition might have been and dont call me anything cause you also dont know "Y KNOW"
People who believe in the 'Paul is dead' talk have dead brains. Just let it go, people. What are the percentages of finding someone that looks exactly like McCartney plus possess the same musical talents? Think about it if you can.
Many of us have been blessed with the gift of being able to see the difference. That's all I can say. STUDY IT and you can get there too, and discover how we were being deceived back then sa now. Please don't worship an imposter.
+Maggie M Well if this "imposter" was responsible for some of the greatest music of our time, then I guess Paul wasn't really that special if you can so easily find someone just as artistic as he is.
Exactly. This utter shit is honestly funny at this point. People trying to convince or threaten others because of *not proven evidence* of Pauls “death”.
And look at early Beatles concerts and notice Paul’s height. Then look at pictures of them doing later albums and the height difference. Paul had suddenly grew taller than Lennon when he was originally 5’11”
If Paul McCartney REALLY DIED then "fake Paul" is doing an EXCELLENT JOB. If he were really dead then the beatles found a person who can sing, write, and talk and look exactly like Paul.
You all got it wrong. This is actually Faul McCartney's twin brother Johnny. Faul wasn't able to make the interview in time so he asked his brother to fill-in for him.
@@cocohotheatclips8264 I too am a musician that has spent my whole life analyzing Paul and haven’t gotten so lucky lol… there are a lot of mysteries and underground information in this world but it is really just plain ridiculous and sad to not be able to appreciate all the incredible music that Paul has created, not to hear his creative voice and evolution, his love for his family, and just attribute it to “a cover up” to “spare the fans” and “make money”
It’s all about discernment. For those of us who were early fans and lived this period of history, yes, there was a perceivable change and difference in Paul after summer 1966. The softness was gone from his eyes and his manner. There was another spirit operating there. (This could later be felt in the band’s subsequent music.) Within a three to nine month period of time (counting from late summer 1966), Paul’s features, mannerisms, spiritual energy, and character had all changed. Even his posture and manner of sitting (legs formerly always crossed from the thigh downward) had changed. That former beautiful, gentle spirit had changed. The change could have resulted from heavy drug use or maybe he had been replaced or maybe some kind of spiritual possession had occurred. (I still wonder about that trip to Kenya with Mal Evans in late 1966, and “Paul’s” cryptic masonic hand sign - devil horns (?) shown in Mal Evans’ Kenya home movie). Honestly speaking as an early fan… Since the summer of 1966, I have not been able to register, recognize, identify, perceive or visually capture any of the beauty, mannerisms, gestures, sweetness or joviality that once belonged to Beatle Paul from 1960 through late summer 1966. The 1967 (and onward) Paul exhibited none of those things. All of those attributes disappeared after 1966. More correctly, all of those cherished attributes ceased after 1966. Something happened that changed Paul in a very short amount of time (in just a few months). I’m just not sure what happened.
@helendropinski3754 I don’t agree. I have two sons both in their 30s. They look pretty much the same way they did in their early 20s. They have matured some, but their features, personality, mannerisms, etc., are all intact. Paul changed in a matter of MONTHS from September 1966 to December 1966. If you are able to view the August 1966 tour press conferences from the Warwick Hotel and Capitol Records and compare that Paul to this Paul from early 1967, it’s obviously not the same person. Little things too, for instance, Paul was a chain smoker. He always had his cigarettes at hand. They are noticeably missing here. His hand gestures, accent, and mannerisms are also off. His eyes are different as well. They are harsher, more glaring. Personal note, since 1972, I have collected images of rock stars from all over the world, David Bowie, Elton John, Mick Jagger, Roger Daltrey, John Lennon, Paul McCartney, etc. I have over 5,000 images of Paul alone (no lie, no exaggeration). There was a change. In my collection, the change is visually documented. However, to each his own. Like many others, I recognize the difference.
@marileelockwood5408 Thank you. I appreciate your reply. Yes, there was definitely a change of some profound sort between September and December of 1966. Maybe one day we’ll receive an honest and complete answer. (I hope that answer comes within my lifetime.)
Tooo funny. Paul lives. Listen to his interviews from 1964 till present day. Same mannerism same "uhh" when thinking of a response. THIS IS PAUL PEOPLE. Nobody ever looks the same forever. I know I went through all kinds of looks and styles thru my years. Paul and the rest of the band fooled you guy's. Great music great sales tricks they were the best at everything.
you're so delusional it's sad. You can adopt someone else's mannerisms. That does not explain the facial changes (in less than a year might I add), him wearing colored socks (real Paul ONLY wore black socks and said he HATED multicolored socks), fake Paul has 6 toes, fake Paul has a Scottish accent that slips out at times. Fake Paul has been caught lying about the history of the Beatles (him saying he met George as a child when they met at Academy). There's plenty more examples
Olivia Harrison greeting him with "hello Billy"...Ringo reacting to him calling John's death a drag "its a drag isn't it William "..him not going to his father's funeral ..I remember hearing on the late night news in the UK that Paul McCartney had been involved in a serious road crash..then the media went quiet on it
Let's clear your whole statement out, as I've been The Beatles' fan ever since I was a 5 year old kid. 1. The reason why Olivia called him "Billy" is because she knew about the PiD conspiracy theory, since every single newspaper article in any country - especially America - was about it. She didn't believe in the whole thing like the rest of the normal human-beings - including the other band members and their wives and families - and her greeting was meant to be ironic. If you've watched the whole Get Back documentary, you would know the point instead of thinking it's another one of the clues Paul is dead and was replaced by some random person named William "Billy Shears" Campbell Shepherd. 2. Same thing for Ringo calling him "William". Even though they knew Paul's sad people go around the world saying he's dead - when he's, in fact, not - his closest people still joked around sometimes with him about it all. He took them like jokes as they are and didn't mind anything. Not because he doesn't have anything to say because "everyone's paid by him to keep the secrets" and he's basically "caught". It's just he doesn't want to discuss about something that's still going on worldwide and makes him really sad. Note that Americans started with PiD, due to "The Beatles are more popular than Jesus" controversy during their last tour in 1966 where Paul was always defending the entire group and John who the whole continent hates even up to this day, even though the band broke up decades ago and he was shot in front of his apartment in New York City circa 1980. Knowing America is messing with them ever since 1964 is just tragic. America really showed its true bad side and lashed out on some 20 year old boys making music and being infinite times better than them. Even Bob Dylan was jealous enough, so he destroyed them by introducing them to drugs for the first time. If this ever means to you, the rest of the band members were calling him names and stuff, just because he kept refusing to take any drugs they've had, especially LSD. Though, since Paul couldn't take the gradation from his own friends, he decided to take some as well. Though, they've been forcing him to do so more and more until they all became addicts. 3. The only two reasons why Paul never attended to his father Jim's funeral in 1974 was because he wasn't treated normally and fairly by his own father AND he didn't want The Beatles' fans swarming up the whole graveyard, just because Paul's there (later on, he paid Michael for the funeral to be private, so he can have some peace while mourning over his father, even though he treated Paul like he's some sort of man toy who he can play it when it comes to emotions). If you knew Jim called Paul ugly and fat when he first came out of his mother Mary's womb and always hated the fact John would come in their house to study and make music, you wouldn't think it was because he's a replacement, so he doesn't care about his family members. You know already Jim treated him terribly and was even forcing him to wed Dot Rhone. I've researched everything deeply and, well, Paul didn't want to marry her himself, but it was a forced marriage all by his father, Jim McCartney. Anyway, after all his father's done negatively to him - in verbal and mental ways - he still decided to respect him as a Liverpudlian (family originated from Scotland). All in all, Paul's still alive. He's changed much physically, but that all depends on age, angle and light. His sudden physical change in 1967 was due to a huge intake of LSD (as much as the rest of the members were taking as well). Sometimes his nose can be small, sometimes big, but it depends on the angle and clearance of the source. You know the cameras in the '60s weren't very much professional up until 1967-1968, especially the journalists' video cameras. No, it's not an excuse, but a fact. My grandparents were alive back then and I have one of their cameras at home. Bad quality, that's for sure. It was bought in 1964-1965. I keep it as a memoir to one of them. The reason you see his eye color changing in lots of photos is because he has hazel eyes. Hazel eyes are mostly known for their color change, which is a result to light changing. So, for example, if there's light shining on your eyes, they'll immediately change into green - just like in the Hey Jude music video - and if there's low light or darkness, they'll change into brown. Lots of his photos which aren't black & white indicate he has brown eyes. Though, people keep saying his eyes are black, but it's either the source is black & white or it's been recolored in a non-natural way. When he was questioned for the newspapers, lots of sources put "brown" as his hair and eye color, which is true. No, this whole text isn't me defending my favorite Beatle. It's just the facts you and the rest of the PiD believers refuse to accept and just go in your own way. He's never damaged your lives enough, so you can accuse him of being some sort of replacement ("Faul") of Paul and he paid everyone Paul knew to not even say a word or they'll be executed. Blah, blah, blah. Come on, wake up. It's 2023. It'll be 2024 for 4 months and you're still acting like fools on the same hill (The Beatles reference). Grow up for once. Especially those who are from America. And, no, I'm not looking forward to fight about Americans being pretty princesses and calling me a retard for being against them. Call me whatever and say I'm a fake fan. I don't care. Those who are true fans like me would know who is speaking the truth and who's not. Have an amazing day/night. I hope you wake up from this silly PiD schizophrenia you still believe in after decades. 😁 P.S - Don't reply to me if you have some stupid excuses to say. No offense.
I just watched a Paul McCartney interview from 1964 and then watched the interview with this guy, not the same person not even close. The real Paul in the interview in 1964 never said "you know" once.
I feel like everyone forgets the drug part about Paul McCartney. He took enough LSD, smoked enough cigarettes, and drank enough to the point that it changed the way he looked physically and acted mentally. It's still Paul. Case closed.
Cassie Rosa and he got his head stuck in a wine press, while his feet were stretched by holding on to a post with his legs. See beatles cartoon "the night before" from episode 60IF
Because he is. You can’t help,but follow,the media narrate. This guy is nothing like the real Paul. This guy is Billy Shears. Why do you think George had a tough time with this character. George says something terrible happened in 66, he had to go to India
@Resolution I know William Campbell very well. He is a real person. Not from Scotland. From Ottawa. He did win a contest. But he is a very old man now. And doesn't really look like him anymore. Paul is not William Shears Campbell It is time to give up on a 60s teenage fantasy born out of a satirical article making fun of a burgeoning teenage rumor back then and then spurred on by an opportunistic record company and kept alive now by very impressionable and stupid people (who think they are smart) who are convinced by the flimiest of evidence like an aging face and voice over a span of 60 years that we all go through and quotes and video evidence taken out of context, and people who don't understand height illusions in photography. George and Olivia said the Billy thing in front of Paul if there was a camera around on purpose as much as they could as part of their dry sense of humor. So did John.
Oh my god what does this even mean? After years of learning more about art and music and getting used to media exposure of course PAUL would be more confident
Folks try to say Paul was high and that is why he makes no sense, but it seems more logical this is Faul, a new person trying to come to grips with the limelight and being a Beatle.
I think it's so funny how people believe that he's really dead. All someone has to do is manipulate a couple of photos and compare pictures of him when he had more of a baby face and all of a sudden everyone has their tin foil hats on. Just hilarious. Lovely interview though.
cubomania3 i guess people who dont believe in the magical man in the sky with a beard and Pauls “death” should be banished into hell Yes? You’re hilarious.
Great interview! It's Paul, not Faul, guys. You'd think you would get the basics right after all these years. You just can't find a person to come along and replace a talent like this man! Shit... Even he knows how great he is!!! Ha Ha! Egos aside... This is Paul and he's brilliant... And that's it! End of story!
also let’s give John and George and Ringo (and George Martin!) some credit… as if they would go a long with a “cover up” to “spare the media” or “make more money” … insane
actually he isn't any of those things, but he's definitely trying to say something, it's just his delivery is kinda scatterbrained, and I get that since he's an artist first and foremost not an orator.
lsd man, also dude became a full blown hippy by this point trying to promote the youth movement. before then he was just trying to make a name for himself and the beatles, so they were on their best behavior.
@@Hester-l6k to me, his accent is a tad different than the prior Paul. Like you said, I do think it's a bit more Scottish. I don't think it's the same as original Paul, although I don't claim to know what became of original Paul. It just looks like some 'sleight of hand', a lot of plastic surgery, goofy wigs, etc were used to replace him. People say, 'well the next guy was too much of a musical genius!'. Maybe Faul is actually a far better all around musician, but it's likely Faul's creative output was created by Tavistock, deliberately promoted on the airwaves.
He's saying such great things about open-mindedness and I read such shit people are talking about his mustachio and whether he died in a playpark slide accident and shit .
*Stop mucking around in these tinfoil hat sites that prey on the easily fooled and convince them that they are the "critical thinkers" and everyone else are the unthinking sheep. Going into these sites is not doing research, lol.* *There are many many pre-1966 pictures where he has a long face. As many as the round face. It's as if you are brand new to this planet. Different angles will give you different looks. Even with pictures of yourself. Faulers are missing that nuance gene. Though his mop top did a lot of the work rounding out his face too.* *On Justice for James she actually passed off Paul's Stage IEM as a prosthetic ear and you all ate that up. Lol.* *On Sage Of Quay he did an "investigation" into how it would be impossible for them to write and record and arrange Rubber Soul from October 12th to November 15th* *But what he forgot to mention was that they came in dry into the October recordings only after their June recordings were already completed* *He knew that you all only get your info from these moronic sites and so you wouldn't know that very well known fact. That's how I know he's a scammer.* Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime. *A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece.* *And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible malleable fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin and that distinctive arched line under his brow and above his eyelids as 1963 Paul had. Stella and Mary too also have that distinctive line above their eyelids*** *And at 20 James looks exactly like 1963 Paul but with his mother's blonde hair. And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael.* *James and Stella gets their strawberry blond reddish light features from Linda. Not from Vivian Stanshall.* *How can James look like a disguise? Lol* *As that is what Vivian and Faul are supposed to be. Faul with surgeries and daily latex every time he goes out (lol) and Vivian with strawberry blond reddish wigs and Hollywood prosthetics. Lol (as "William is supposed to most resemble his first character Phil Averill, bahahaha, even having to say "his first character" lowered my IQ by 50 points, lol).* Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only song that his dad lied about and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding and pictures of them together. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back *Paul buying that Scotland farm on June 17, 1966, etc* *Tons of pictures him and his dad laughing together in the late 60s and 70s.* *Google The Beatles Sweden Press conference. You'll see 1964 lefthanded Paul smoking mostly with his right hand. Also a video on Paul Is Not Dead channel of over 100 pictures of him using both hands before and after 66. Just a product of living in a right-handed world. Most prevalent in older generation lefthanders like myself and Paul.* ==== *He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs.* *And a lot of the time you are comparing a baby fat faced Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat on his face in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward.* *And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline simple. Every single photo that these tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day* *These tinfoil hat sites prey on the easily fooled and convince them that they are the "critical thinkers" and everyone else are the unthinking sheep.* Do you really think they and all his friends and family are that stupid to call him Billy whenever cameras are around? It's part their dry British humor. But mostly their nickname for him since back in the day when he would sign into hotels and recording sessions as Billy Martin. You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962-1970. If you reply TLDR I'll give you my bored yawn now.
I know what you mean. When i first noticed the replacement i thought "well i prefer the albums with Billy". But saying that, i much prefer the Lennon / Harrison songs to Bill's.
Amazing how Faul looked identical and has the exact same voice/accent as Paul and played guitar and bass left handed and wrote songs in exactly the same style as Paul. 🤡
Would you compare trash like Wild Honey Pie written by William (1937-) with Yesterday by James Paul McCartney (1942-1966)? William is NOT a genius like people say. Hey Jude is just filled with Nah's that it makes it awful.
So why do my Beatles albums credit Lennon-McCartney? Wouldn't that other genius composer want the credit and $$? You people are just hilarious😂 I'm sure there will be a genius with a totally logical answer.
James Paul McCartney died in car crash on September 11 1966. Brian Epstein with the consent of the authorities at the time and the three Beatles, he decides to replace Paul with a right-handed session musician named William Shepherd. Everyone involved, including their families, vowed to keep everything a secret. However, The Beatles produced over a hundred clues about Paul's death in their albums and images. William underwent numerous cosmetic surgeries to resemble Paul. William is two inches taller than Paul, William has green eyes, William has a weaker and thinner voice than Paul, William has totally different manners. Musically, Paul was a genius, William is just a good musician.
@@olskzeri2723 hes been enlightened maaaaan probably got stoned out his mind and saw the unity in everything, that's what hes trying to explain in this interview, but he can't seem to get it across because it's too deep of a concept and he doesn't lack the intellectual jargon like Alan Watts could.
I'm neutral just investigating and his replacement is very smart..Don't forget he is playing Paul...The story was Squashed and the Beatles on had 2 years in...1966 Paul crashed his car and was beheaded...That's why in 1969 they pumped out tons of their stuff from his old recording material added it too Lennons lines in the studio until 1969 John says in an interview on the latenight show (1971)it was no fun playing with The band anymore because the fans didn't hear their music because they were so loud..."Poor Excuse"Another poor excuse Lennon gave was they didn't sit down and write together like they used too..Him and Faul were bestfriends since High School and he despised the new Paul..He wasn't seen live with him since the Beatles...They did it to bring in Billions of dollars and even kept him alive, married to his illuminati handler ,making Billions more in sales over the Years...The 80's was a huge seller for them after Lennon was Assassinated by the CIA....
God gave me Eyes to see things others can't...Why would he clearly be wearing a fakr mustache..So Fake it almost fell off and he had to fix it...Just that 1 fact makes this whole thing suspicious...
Andrew Thomas I live in Las Vegas, and here it's all about the odds. So what are the odds that after Paul supposedly died, they found a guy who looked like Paul, sounded like Paul, acted like Paul, (And here you have think this guy has to look, sound, and act enough like Paul to fool, at the very least, casual acquaintances.), was about the same age as Paul, is left handed, plays multiple instruments, and is a pretty damn good song writer? And having to do all of this within a week or two of when Paul supposedly died, seeing as we have photos of Paul from November of 1966 shortly after the 9th when he supposedly died. We're talking trillions to one just to find a guy like that, let alone to be lucky enough to find him within a week of the supposed death. Sorry guy, Paul did not die; he's alive and well. Time to move on to some other conspiracy. Try the masons, that thing hasn't died in centuries.
It's true people. It really is. But not only that... George died in 1967 and was replaced by an Indian Swami; John died in 1968 and was replaced by a post-op transgender japanese schoolgirl; and Ringo died in 1969 and was replaced by a tapir. I read it all on the internet and it must be true.
In five months, Paul's voice sounds faster, much more mature than the last 1966 interview. Scores of other points are screaming this is not the real Paul.
even if he never did die, which there is, without a doubt, really weird/convincing stuff to it, he changed so much, enough to make John really not like Paul too much.
@@patcola7335 Exactly. People never think about Paul's family, friends, or every other Beatle member when thinking about the theory. How the fuck would The Beatles accept replacing Paul jusy like that? I'm just tired of this theory.
@@bautibonzini2835 his family was informed about the switch after Paul died....they all knew, and everyone in the industry knows, but its taboo to speak of openly
@@Mrgattes1 So? What about the other Beatles, I wouldn't believe any of them, especially George or John for example, to agree with this kind of shit. Fighting for truth and learning aboit spirituality but then lying and saying their friend is dead.
@@bautibonzini2835 of course they were told about it...they had no choice but to go along. That's why they stopped touring and band broke up 4 years later... Lennon was starting to slip up so they dealt with him. Listen to the song 'How do you sleep' by Lennon. The Beatles were not an organic band that made it big. They were a Tavistock project. Good books are out there the explain it all
To all the people who think this is a fake Paul McCartney, I think I figured out why you think he died in 1966. You just have to listen to what he’s saying, but instead you’re so busy comparing his mannerisms that you miss the whole point. Paul got ENLIGHTENED by using LSD and by going do India (like George and John, i don’t know about Ringo). He’s talking about human shared counciousness and ideas of personal freedom and realisation, these are ideas at the core of spiritual teachings. Having these realizations (and doing drugs) DRAMATICALLY CHANGE a person. It’s also called an ego-death. The whole person you thought you were disappears, and the real you emerges. The drugs, cigarettes and alcohol deteriorated his voice like almost any other rock singer. Even your face changes over time.’ He became mature and aware, you’re all just missing a kid who in some sense actually died, he’s a man now.
if you have any experience with pot, it's obvious to see that paul is just baked as hell in this video. the way he's rambling, and the kind of vacant look in his eyes and the squinty eyebrows. they're all common signs that before he came into the studio he was probably puffing on the biggest reefer that side of amsterdam
So you're telling me they (whoever they are) found a guy that looked EXACTLY like paul, sounded like him had the same mannerisms and talent who threw his old life away, and whos kids look exactly like paul..and did all of that within a few months? where is "billys" family at anyways?
This one’s full on confident and doesn’t stop for a breath the original Paul was thoughtful about his words this one talks without a breath ya ya ya ya ya
If you look at the Paul from the movie "help" and then after 1967 singing "im a loser" with John, you can tell it is a different man. He is thinner and taller, and very weird looking. John is really cold and distant and shifts his eyes to him singing "I am not what I appear tp be".
Paul's face was heart shaped. Here you see a long face. Listen to Paul's voice prior to 1966. I understand that your voice changes but within 2 years. No! And what about his green eyes? Paul had brown eyes.
I was surprised too. You're right in my opinion. The nose changed, the ears changed ( & part looks like it fell off in one interview. ( in the wings era) eye colour too. & it's not just him , there are heaps of examples of this stuff with others.
@Truth & Light compare George in 64 to him in 67. He obvious changed a lot but no one mentions that. I personally think Paul's not dead. After all, why would they put obvious clues in their music? It's just a dumb hoax
Sweet n' Sour Sauce do u think there is any truth to the John Halliday rumors? I believe John Halliday looks more like the real Paul than this Arabic lookin guy here!
One things for sure this guy is rather serious, and doesnt smile much. Paul really lost his sense of humour?.. And I know maybe Faul liked Grandad suites with ties. I mean he's literally wearing the shittest suite in the world, with a hawaiian tie. Did Paul ever dress this shit before??.. He seems to me somewhat incoherant, and definitely not content or relaxed.
STILL, YOU KNOW, IT'S A FANTASTIC STORY! THIS MAN---BILLY---GAVE UP HIS IDENTITY, HIS LIFE, WENT THROUGH PLASTIC SURGERIES, ETC TO GIVE THE WORLD THE BEATLES, AND A LOT OF GREAT MUSIC! YES, HE FOOLED US! BUT, STILL, IT'S A FANTASTIC STORY!
that is paul in the video, there is no billy shears. it doesn't take a genius to see that the reason mccartney is acting off in this video is that he's high as a kite, and i know that because he sounds exactly like me after i've had a few joints.
Faul's chin is shorter than Paul's was. His ears are different. He's 2 inches taller. He grew 2 inches from 66 to 67? Faul is no where near as handsome as Paul was. Faul's hair is lighter and thinner. Paul had black hair and it was the thickest hair I have ever seen. Faul's eyes are light. Paul's eyes were very dark. I think Faul is Paul's twin. Paul is dead. Pics of his body are on the internet.
Yes they were identical twins. Look at pictures of Paul as a little boy. There’s a picture of his twin who is supposed to be younger than Paul but in the picture they’re exactly the same age. And they’re identical. As adults they didn’t look alike at all. I don’t believe that Mike guy is Paul/Fouls brother at all. Just a relative perhaps playing a part.
Anne Mott -- Faul's hair grows in the opposite direction that Paul's did. Paul's hair naturally parted on his the left and flowed over toward the right of his head.
You’re close. Faul(Bill Shepherd) actually dies his hair because it’s actually blonde. He also doesn’t have the hair loss gene as where Paul was losing his hair and wrapped it around where it looked like a toupee. Also their hair grows different from each other. The Who sang it “Parted to the left now parted to the right.”
Viendo esos viejos videos, George y los otros tenían razón, es incomprensible tanta locura. George, la tercera voz importante de Los Beatles, sabía calar hondo en sus compañeros cuando hablaba. Casualmente fue el primero en querer irse de la banda. John lo ha dicho. Se cansaron de ser graciosos muñequitos para adorno que cantaban hermosas canciones de amor; se hartaron de ser utilizados para distintos eventos como si fueran sanadores que curaban males con su sola presencia. No eran ellos mismos como lo ha expresado Lennon. Ellos sólo eran músicos, sabes, artistas. Pretendían hacer arte con la música y eran vanguardistas desde la primera época. En los primeros años de Hamburgo, se habían juntado con un grupo de artistas de vanguardia quienes les diseñaron sus peinados, muy locos para la época y con el cual sorprendieron a todos. Ese fue su gran secreto, también fueron una banda pop muy fashion con reminiscencias vanguardistas. A mediados de los 60 sentían que se caían artísticamente y el concierto de Candlestick Park marcó el final de la locura. Es un concierto horrible y allí dijeron basta.
Oh no guys, Paul just died, lets find someone that looks, sounds, and plays like him. You guys are idiots if you believe this. If you say the Abbey road picture with his shoes off is not because he was wearing sandals, look up pictures from the photo shoot , you will find some with his sandals on. How do you find someone that plays bass as good as him? I am a bassist and I can confirm, that can not be replicated. This is just stupid.
THERE IS A LOT OF DIFFERENCE IN THE FACE THIS ONE WHICH LATER WAS CALLED FAUL. THE FACE IS SKINNER, SHAKEN. THE ORIGINAL HAD A ROUNDER FACE. IT IS LOGICAL THAT IT IS NOT THE SAME PERSON.
It looks like he's using his right hand in his body language a lot more than his left. When he's referring to himself, he puts his right hand close to his chest.
Highly intelligent guy. It was clear when he was -- what, 24? 25? -- and his success since then has confirmed it. Paul McCartney is a living legend, and deservedly. When he leaves this planet, he'll be missed for (I believe) centuries. That being said, I still love Beatles music, though only select songs, and yet haven't liked anything Paul has made since then. Matter of taste, of course. Regardless, he is a giant.
Casey Nova Not what he was saying at all. He said to have an open mind and always be looking for truth. Not sure what could possible be controversial about that.
this is the fake paul... watch the movement of his eyebrow, and compare this interview to the interview of Paul with David Frost in 1964. The Paul in 1964 hardly moved his eyebrow, very less expressive compared to this one. Even when in excitement, the eyebrows tell it all. Notice also the difference in the jaw line and the voice. Remember, in 1964 Paul was fully grown man at early/mid twenties. As such, the voice pitch/tone/vibration shouldn't change that much... Definitely, Paul has died and was replaced by this guy Faul...
+Its Me If you are actually being serious, you know that Paul was arrested several times for possession of marijuana, the whole "Faul" thing would come out to light then, clearly Paul is Paul , there's no "doubles"....
Oh, come now, all you conspiracy boys and girls. Two left-handed geniuses who can compose, then play, some of the world's most astonishing music??? In the 60s we were just beginning to understand audio. Recording studios were constantly upgrading with the latest technology. TV/radio stations were, however, all over the map as far as technology. There was no consistency as there is today with inexpensive digital audio. Paul (or John, George and Ringo) could go from station to station for interviews and easily sound like completely different people. You had to be there. Give it a rest, folks.
Wow, looks just like him, sounds just like him, plays bass just like him, writes songs just like him, writes lyrics just like him, sings just like him and acts just likes him. How gullible do you have to be to jump on the conspiracy bandwagon?
@@crazycat1345 who even cares if this weak conspiracy is true? Sounds like you might be the one “asleep”, wasting your time on this shit. The Beatles are legendary regardless. Go invest your time into a conspiracy theory with more weight, at the very least. But really, ultimately, you need to go outside, take off your flip flops, and touch some sweet,sweet grass.
Profound fucking interview that is still relevant today and a bunch of people are joking about it. Regardless of drugs, what he is saying is exactly where we are at today!
Take a shot everytime he says "y'know". I'm sure by the end of it you'll be off your face
Ellie Louise hahaha I did, but with juice 😂 you’re not old.fangled right? Just a fan page?
Why does musicians always says "You know" in interviews???
I think its like "fillers" that's y they keep on saying y'now or they just think of words to say , maybe they are also running out of words. There are some instances im also like that.
@@lizaginandoy197 Yes, he says "You know" while he think of the next thing to say.
Εllie Louise I need 1000000 cups for that. 😂🤣😆
"You know"
-Paul McCartney -1967
Listen to the Paul McCartney BBC 1966 interview on UA-cam. He also says 'you know' at the end of each sentence. And this was 1966 before Paul apparently died in a car crash according to you Paul is dead believers
smallie210 so u think he wouldn’t know his vocabulary if they pulled off a stunt like that? That’s a weak argument
Its Paul McCartney you fucking idiot
@@Dingoplexor Yes! Besides the forensic evidence: fake Paul is two inches taller, has green eyes, as a longer face, and if you are a true fan of Paul McCartney: Paul had a sweetness in his eyes, the sweetness of his gentle soul. The fake Paul never ever had that sweetness in his eyes. Eyes are the windows of the Soul.
@@randolphstevens6664 definitely looks like 2 different ppl to me
It must have been a hell of a question 'cuz his answer ran nearly 6 minutes.
ABoxOfBroken8Tracks - Paul never smugly rambled on like this. Paul was very friendly and had conversations with people. He was very likeable.
It was about Pink Floyd
@@bethlast4269 yea seems pretty obvious..this guy nevrr shuts up
Why you have a fake moustache? The question is.
Nervous rambling haha it’s so true. He’s guilty rambling.
They should've used this as a "Just Say No!" commercial in the '80s. 😂😂😂
Just say y'know.
@Forensic Files: Paul is Dead, Knowledge is Power To clarify, are you referring to the channel or me?
The Paul in the early days was able to communicate reasonably clearly. The 1967+ version never seems to know what he is saying, you know.
👁️👎🏁🤺🎯
@@amarshmuseconcepta6197 You know, that is as difficult to understand as the revised Paul.
@@electronwave4551
EYE-lluminati🏁
wants....
🤺 *us* 🤺
deceived & ⚰️👊🎯
😉"deciphered👍
He became like that in the early days of Beatlemania. But he's always been awkward.
He said "y'know about 53 times. I counted.
Liars often do that
@@ryanpatrickwhite97 so do people from Liverpool.
Past three commenters got all F's in listening and comprehension...
Irrespective of who says it, it is an absurd, irritating expression. When people use this phrase when talking to me, I think to myself, "I don't know, because you are telling me" - unless they are confirming what I actually did know.
I believe that YOU KNOW is a shorter version of "You Know what I mean", which makes a little more sense.
@@ryanpatrickwhite97 Paul was always this strange. Look at the very first filmed Beatles performance. He was always staring up at the wall like he was spastic.
Just six months before Paul was ending the shows with Long Tall Sally. The transformation was from 1965 to 1967 was one of the most shocking and incredible transformations in pop music history.
@Forensic Files: Paul is Dead, Knowledge is Power this goes for everyone in show business. Many transgendered people have played the role of " paul McCartney ". He is a character with a backstory, not a real person. Many people dont know anything about how show business works.then they think you're mental for telling the truth. What about brown eyed paul on " let it be", or short paul on the 1963 swedish tv show. Not to mention the raspy voice taller paul on the help movie.
Weed and LSD are gateways to spirituality for some people
@@lovinglili5204 How do you define spirituality?
@@thepossessor The realization that you are not your body/ego and that we are all the universe playing a game with itself, and this body is only a vehicle for that. And spirituality for me is practicing that detachment from the body and ego and applying that to your life, I believe that by doing this, your mind can run limitless and free and it can become an antena for awesome ideas, music and art in general..
I think Paul really knows, I can feel it in the joy of his music
@@thepossessor I also think that the Beatles taking LSD really changed them, their music became d e e p e r , a universe in itself!
That is what I believe made the big/shocking transformation
MY GOD! Paul didn't have a moustache before 1967, it MUST be a different person! He's wearing different clothes as well! I must say, the man who replaced him did a good job by writing songs such as Hey Jude, Penny Lane, Lady Madonna, Let It Be, She's Leaving Home, Helter Skelter etc etc, and replicating exactly McCartney's mannerisms, accent, dialect and intonation, bass-playing style and personality. And it was also a stroke of luck that he looked exactly like him!
What the fuck?
No that is true
Give the guy respect he also did write music
@@StLouisGrammarSchool1922 THAT IS NOT TRUE, THAT IS A DAMN CONSPIRACY THEORY, YOU IDIOTS ARE AS STUPID AS THE COVID THEORETICS ARE!!!!
YOU IDIOTS
Here you listen here in only saying if he is dead you also have to give the guys respect and think about what his sition might have been and dont call me anything cause you also dont know "Y KNOW"
Simple and profound. McCartney is and has always been a well rounded mature guy. Super cool and laid back. Live and let live......
"Instead of looking with anger- just look..."
they were all mature and thoughtful interviewed alone. interviewed as a group they acted like children
People who believe in the 'Paul is dead' talk have dead brains. Just let it go, people.
What are the percentages of finding someone that looks exactly like McCartney plus possess the same musical talents? Think about it if you can.
Exacly and they say plastic chirurgie Hahaaa. Not possible in 1966 there is no faul , paul is paul and of story
+SiSenior No chance at all. And that's why there is such a marked difference in the two men.
+Maggie M ...... There isn't
Many of us have been blessed with the gift of being able to see the difference. That's all I can say. STUDY IT and you can get there too, and discover how we were being deceived back then sa now. Please don't worship an imposter.
+Maggie M Well if this "imposter" was responsible for some of the greatest music of our time, then I guess Paul wasn't really that special if you can so easily find someone just as artistic as he is.
paul or faul thats a great interview
Do you want honestly believe that, or is that a joke
@@hughesbrownstudios4728 You Know Your Grammar.
@@Mayhem665 thank you
@@hughesbrownstudios4728 Your Welcome.
@@Mayhem665 Absolutely lethal. Well done 😂😂
Stop talking bollocks about "Faul" and let's talk about what a cool motherf****r Paul is here!
@@Physics99 Correct
Finally someone with a brain
Exactly. This utter shit is honestly funny at this point. People trying to convince or threaten others because of *not proven evidence* of Pauls “death”.
m.ua-cam.com/video/04IyjV66B8M/v-deo.html
And look at early Beatles concerts and notice Paul’s height. Then look at pictures of them doing later albums and the height difference. Paul had suddenly grew taller than Lennon when he was originally 5’11”
Just waiting for someone in the crowd to yell out, "What ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?!"
If Paul McCartney REALLY DIED then "fake Paul" is doing an EXCELLENT JOB. If he were really dead then the beatles found a person who can sing, write, and talk and look exactly like Paul.
Oscar Rojas well we have the DNA tests now so we know that Paul died in 1966.
What DNA Tests?
If the real Paul Died, then Faul wrote my favorites Beatles songs. AND THE ABBEY ROAD CONCEPT!!!!!
And left handed
@@buick4013 Post them, liar.
You all got it wrong. This is actually Faul McCartney's twin brother Johnny. Faul wasn't able to make the interview in time so he asked his brother to fill-in for him.
Lol
+rowan morrison its not like hes growing old.
Who told you this?
😂😂😂😂
Yeah, that's obviously Johnny. He's the cute one, just like Paul (rip) was the cutest Beatle🥰
Thank goodness Faul just happens to be just of an amazing of a song writer/musician
Faul worked his whole life copying and analyzing paul
@@cocohotheatclips8264 And ends up being even more talented and creative... Wow the illuminati must of gotten really lucky am I right?
@@cocohotheatclips8264 I too am a musician that has spent my whole life analyzing Paul and haven’t gotten so lucky lol… there are a lot of mysteries and underground information in this world but it is really just plain ridiculous and sad to not be able to appreciate all the incredible music that Paul has created, not to hear his creative voice and evolution, his love for his family, and just attribute it to “a cover up” to “spare the fans” and “make money”
Paul never died, stop thinking stupid theories
@@soyelfestus7773 my comment was completely sarcastic
It’s all about discernment. For those of us who were early fans and lived this period of history, yes, there was a perceivable change and difference in Paul after summer 1966. The softness was gone from his eyes and his manner. There was another spirit operating there. (This could later be felt in the band’s subsequent music.) Within a three to nine month period of time (counting from late summer 1966), Paul’s features, mannerisms, spiritual energy, and character had all changed. Even his posture and manner of sitting (legs formerly always crossed from the thigh downward) had changed. That former beautiful, gentle spirit had changed. The change could have resulted from heavy drug use or maybe he had been replaced or maybe some kind of spiritual possession had occurred. (I still wonder about that trip to Kenya with Mal Evans in late 1966, and “Paul’s” cryptic masonic hand sign - devil horns (?) shown in Mal Evans’ Kenya home movie).
Honestly speaking as an early fan… Since the summer of 1966, I have not been able to register, recognize, identify, perceive or visually capture any of the beauty, mannerisms, gestures, sweetness or joviality that once belonged to Beatle Paul from 1960 through late summer 1966. The 1967 (and onward) Paul exhibited none of those things. All of those attributes disappeared after 1966. More correctly, all of those cherished attributes ceased after 1966. Something happened that changed Paul in a very short amount of time (in just a few months). I’m just not sure what happened.
Everyone, especially men, change alot between age 20 to 27. 1962 Paul was 20. 1967 Paul was 25 big change years from a boy to a young man.
@helendropinski3754
I don’t agree. I have two sons both in their 30s. They look pretty much the same way they did in their early 20s. They have matured some, but their features, personality, mannerisms, etc., are all intact. Paul changed in a matter of MONTHS from September 1966 to December 1966. If you are able to view the August 1966 tour press conferences from the Warwick Hotel and Capitol Records and compare that Paul to this Paul from early 1967, it’s obviously not the same person. Little things too, for instance, Paul was a chain smoker. He always had his cigarettes at hand. They are noticeably missing here. His hand gestures, accent, and mannerisms are also off. His eyes are different as well. They are harsher, more glaring. Personal note, since 1972, I have collected images of rock stars from all over the world, David Bowie, Elton John, Mick Jagger, Roger Daltrey, John Lennon, Paul McCartney, etc. I have over 5,000 images of Paul alone (no lie, no exaggeration). There was a change. In my collection, the change is visually documented. However, to each his own. Like many others, I recognize the difference.
This is a very good comment. Thankyou for your sincerity. ✨
@@thescienceofhomeThankyou for your honesty. I agree with you. ✨
@marileelockwood5408 Thank you. I appreciate your reply. Yes, there was definitely a change of some profound sort between September and December of 1966. Maybe one day we’ll receive an honest and complete answer. (I hope that answer comes within my lifetime.)
Tooo funny. Paul lives. Listen to his interviews from 1964 till present day. Same mannerism same "uhh" when thinking of a response. THIS IS PAUL PEOPLE. Nobody ever looks the same forever. I know I went through all kinds of looks and styles thru my years. Paul and the rest of the band fooled you guy's. Great music great sales tricks they were the best at everything.
Exactly.
@@BeatlemaccaAR you are in denial
you're so delusional it's sad. You can adopt someone else's mannerisms. That does not explain the facial changes (in less than a year might I add), him wearing colored socks (real Paul ONLY wore black socks and said he HATED multicolored socks), fake Paul has 6 toes, fake Paul has a Scottish accent that slips out at times. Fake Paul has been caught lying about the history of the Beatles (him saying he met George as a child when they met at Academy). There's plenty more examples
Paul Mccartney real si murió, y tú mamacita a de estar viva no?!
@@kevinking2468 nah, she's just smart
Olivia Harrison greeting him with "hello Billy"...Ringo reacting to him calling John's death a drag "its a drag isn't it William "..him not going to his father's funeral ..I remember hearing on the late night news in the UK that Paul McCartney had been involved in a serious road crash..then the media went quiet on it
Olivia said "hey babes"
shut the fuck up, if you heard that on the radio, it would be public record.
@@bellott7397 No, no she didn't
Let's clear your whole statement out, as I've been The Beatles' fan ever since I was a 5 year old kid.
1. The reason why Olivia called him "Billy" is because she knew about the PiD conspiracy theory, since every single newspaper article in any country - especially America - was about it. She didn't believe in the whole thing like the rest of the normal human-beings - including the other band members and their wives and families - and her greeting was meant to be ironic. If you've watched the whole Get Back documentary, you would know the point instead of thinking it's another one of the clues Paul is dead and was replaced by some random person named William "Billy Shears" Campbell Shepherd.
2. Same thing for Ringo calling him "William". Even though they knew Paul's sad people go around the world saying he's dead - when he's, in fact, not - his closest people still joked around sometimes with him about it all. He took them like jokes as they are and didn't mind anything. Not because he doesn't have anything to say because "everyone's paid by him to keep the secrets" and he's basically "caught". It's just he doesn't want to discuss about something that's still going on worldwide and makes him really sad. Note that Americans started with PiD, due to "The Beatles are more popular than Jesus" controversy during their last tour in 1966 where Paul was always defending the entire group and John who the whole continent hates even up to this day, even though the band broke up decades ago and he was shot in front of his apartment in New York City circa 1980.
Knowing America is messing with them ever since 1964 is just tragic. America really showed its true bad side and lashed out on some 20 year old boys making music and being infinite times better than them. Even Bob Dylan was jealous enough, so he destroyed them by introducing them to drugs for the first time.
If this ever means to you, the rest of the band members were calling him names and stuff, just because he kept refusing to take any drugs they've had, especially LSD. Though, since Paul couldn't take the gradation from his own friends, he decided to take some as well. Though, they've been forcing him to do so more and more until they all became addicts.
3. The only two reasons why Paul never attended to his father Jim's funeral in 1974 was because he wasn't treated normally and fairly by his own father AND he didn't want The Beatles' fans swarming up the whole graveyard, just because Paul's there (later on, he paid Michael for the funeral to be private, so he can have some peace while mourning over his father, even though he treated Paul like he's some sort of man toy who he can play it when it comes to emotions). If you knew Jim called Paul ugly and fat when he first came out of his mother Mary's womb and always hated the fact John would come in their house to study and make music, you wouldn't think it was because he's a replacement, so he doesn't care about his family members. You know already Jim treated him terribly and was even forcing him to wed Dot Rhone. I've researched everything deeply and, well, Paul didn't want to marry her himself, but it was a forced marriage all by his father, Jim McCartney. Anyway, after all his father's done negatively to him - in verbal and mental ways - he still decided to respect him as a Liverpudlian (family originated from Scotland).
All in all, Paul's still alive. He's changed much physically, but that all depends on age, angle and light.
His sudden physical change in 1967 was due to a huge intake of LSD (as much as the rest of the members were taking as well).
Sometimes his nose can be small, sometimes big, but it depends on the angle and clearance of the source. You know the cameras in the '60s weren't very much professional up until 1967-1968, especially the journalists' video cameras. No, it's not an excuse, but a fact. My grandparents were alive back then and I have one of their cameras at home. Bad quality, that's for sure. It was bought in 1964-1965. I keep it as a memoir to one of them.
The reason you see his eye color changing in lots of photos is because he has hazel eyes. Hazel eyes are mostly known for their color change, which is a result to light changing. So, for example, if there's light shining on your eyes, they'll immediately change into green - just like in the Hey Jude music video - and if there's low light or darkness, they'll change into brown. Lots of his photos which aren't black & white indicate he has brown eyes. Though, people keep saying his eyes are black, but it's either the source is black & white or it's been recolored in a non-natural way. When he was questioned for the newspapers, lots of sources put "brown" as his hair and eye color, which is true.
No, this whole text isn't me defending my favorite Beatle. It's just the facts you and the rest of the PiD believers refuse to accept and just go in your own way. He's never damaged your lives enough, so you can accuse him of being some sort of replacement ("Faul") of Paul and he paid everyone Paul knew to not even say a word or they'll be executed. Blah, blah, blah. Come on, wake up. It's 2023. It'll be 2024 for 4 months and you're still acting like fools on the same hill (The Beatles reference). Grow up for once. Especially those who are from America. And, no, I'm not looking forward to fight about Americans being pretty princesses and calling me a retard for being against them. Call me whatever and say I'm a fake fan. I don't care. Those who are true fans like me would know who is speaking the truth and who's not.
Have an amazing day/night. I hope you wake up from this silly PiD schizophrenia you still believe in after decades. 😁
P.S - Don't reply to me if you have some stupid excuses to say. No offense.
John and George called him "Beatle Billy."
I just watched a Paul McCartney interview from 1964 and then watched the interview with this guy, not the same person not even close. The real Paul in the interview in 1964 never said "you know" once.
Then watch every other interview, he says “Y’know” at least once.
And just because he says 1 word a lot means he’s dead? What?
@@Caine462 It's just one clue, there are dozens.
@@lennyanders1639 No matter what clues you give, Paul McCartney, is alive and well. Your clues are false
@@Caine462Polite correction..."You know" is 2 words.
@@davidbrown8763 Y’know is one word buddy
Longer face, darker hair, different personality....different guy.
Wrong
@@liveinthepresent219 No.
@@leemendez7876 Yes
@@liveinthepresent219 No.
@@leemendez7876 Yes
I feel like everyone forgets the drug part about Paul McCartney. He took enough LSD, smoked enough cigarettes, and drank enough to the point that it changed the way he looked physically and acted mentally. It's still Paul. Case closed.
Cassie Rosa I always thought the same thing!
Cassie Rosa Oh, this *is Paul*. One has to watch out for Fingo, Foerge, and, Fohn.
Lol LSD and cigarettes, in only a few months, change the shape of your skull, eyes, nose, mouth, and neck. And only in this one guy.
Cassie Rosa and he got his head stuck in a wine press, while his feet were stretched by holding on to a post with his legs. See beatles cartoon "the night before" from episode 60IF
Kr W what are you fucking talking about? 2Pac is alive!!!! 9/11 never really happened!!! James Holmes was never born!!!
Why do people believe that he is dead? It's ridiculous.
People like kinky conspiracy. )
They really don't - like flat-earthers they just want to tease the hell out of everyone.
Or could it be the wig and fake mustache?@@olgacaplinska93
They're stupid.
Because he is. You can’t help,but follow,the media narrate. This guy is nothing like the real Paul. This guy is Billy Shears. Why do you think George had a tough time with this character. George says something terrible happened in 66, he had to go to India
That is, you can't, you know, tune in but it's alright; that is, I think it's not too bad.
I think Paul came up with the "you know" bit in that song
This isn’t real Paul M. The real Paul M died in 1966. It’s a cover up between the UK govt, the Beatles and music industry.
Are you sure about that?
-John Cena
that's using a lot of words to say acid is fucking great
+degree7 No he didn't.
Not on that evidence
The real Paul was never so talkative. Billy has verbal diorrhea in a verbal panic.
@Resolution I know William Campbell very well. He is a real person. Not from Scotland. From Ottawa. He did win a contest. But he is a very old man now. And doesn't really look like him anymore.
Paul is not William Shears Campbell
It is time to give up on a 60s teenage fantasy born out of a satirical article making fun of a burgeoning teenage rumor back then and then spurred on by an opportunistic record company and kept alive now by very impressionable and stupid people (who think they are smart) who are convinced by the flimiest of evidence like an aging face and voice over a span of 60 years that we all go through and quotes and video evidence taken out of context, and people who don't understand height illusions in photography.
George and Olivia said the Billy thing in front of Paul if there was a camera around on purpose as much as they could as part of their dry sense of humor. So did John.
Oh my god what does this even mean? After years of learning more about art and music and getting used to media exposure of course PAUL would be more confident
"...no one's better than anyone else..." What a great guy.
Folks try to say Paul was high and that is why he makes no sense, but it seems more logical this is Faul, a new person trying to come to grips with the limelight and being a Beatle.
@@MarkBarna1 You are correct. 👍🏼
I think it's so funny how people believe that he's really dead. All someone has to do is manipulate a couple of photos and compare pictures of him when he had more of a baby face and all of a sudden everyone has their tin foil hats on.
Just hilarious. Lovely interview though.
@cubomania3 Idiot.
cubomania3 you’re a fucking tin head lmao
cubomania3 do you also believe in the magical man in the sky?
cubomania3 i guess people who dont believe in the magical man in the sky with a beard and Pauls “death” should be banished into hell
Yes? You’re hilarious.
A lot of people just take photos of Paul where he’s at a different angle, or the camera was using a different lens lmao
Great interview! It's Paul, not Faul, guys. You'd think you would get the basics right after all these years. You just can't find a person to come along and replace a talent like this man! Shit... Even he knows how great he is!!! Ha Ha! Egos aside... This is Paul and he's brilliant... And that's it! End of story!
Letsgo! People thinking he is faul its just stupid
Yeah Who the fuck could replace the man of music RIGHT!
also let’s give John and George and Ringo (and George Martin!) some credit… as if they would go a long with a “cover up” to “spare the media” or “make more money” … insane
He's bright, insightful and articulate. And it is beyond sicking what passes for music these days.
LOL. Like Kanye and Rihanna who he worked with.
actually he isn't any of those things, but he's definitely trying to say something, it's just his delivery is kinda scatterbrained, and I get that since he's an artist first and foremost not an orator.
@@metrab8901 right. He tries to explain a very simple thing and tries to hard to look heavy and bright.
It's a word salad. Nothing of substance. Trying to be articulate and failing spectacularly. If that's JPM, my cock's a kipper....
and even seven years later it continues to decline
He looks like a Brit who has been cast as a Chinaman for a low budget TV movie.
@@marcopervo 🤣
Gives out arsehole vibes. The original Paul didn’t. Voices don’t match. Not to mention they look different.
lsd man, also dude became a full blown hippy by this point trying to promote the youth movement. before then he was just trying to make a name for himself and the beatles, so they were on their best behavior.
that's my take. Faul has a thicker 'brogue' sort of accent, like he pronounces various words or vowels in a more 'British' way.
@@monkeyb1820 Some believe this guy is Scottish, do you hear that accent at all?
@@Hester-l6k to me, his accent is a tad different than the prior Paul. Like you said, I do think it's a bit more Scottish. I don't think it's the same as original Paul, although I don't claim to know what became of original Paul. It just looks like some 'sleight of hand', a lot of plastic surgery, goofy wigs, etc were used to replace him. People say, 'well the next guy was too much of a musical genius!'. Maybe Faul is actually a far better all around musician, but it's likely Faul's creative output was created by Tavistock, deliberately promoted on the airwaves.
@@monkeyb1820 or Faul sang the songs Paul wrote before he died. Loads of singers write songs years before they actually release them.
if u a true beatle fan youll know
cesar Padilla y,know
Damn then you beatle fans are retarded then if you believe this
Que onda loco y ese nombre chingon
Soy Padilla y mi padre también su nombre es cesar
Absolute Absurd True TRUE Beatles fans know this sh** ain’t true.
He's saying such great things about open-mindedness and I read such shit people are talking about his mustachio and whether he died in a playpark slide accident and shit
.
yup...that irony
+John David There's a great point there, but Jesus, isn't he rambling on. If only he knew how to put it across in a more coherent way.
That’s because most people are to dumb to comprehend what he’s talking about.
@@violatress I think it’s pretty coherent and put together in an articulate and intelligent manner
I am curious to know if Paul’s willy length changed around November 1966 and January 1967 🤔
They couldn't find a better fitting wig?
He was just coming off the set of his other gig as VIV and didnt have time to change it
I thought the same thing lol!
*Stop mucking around in these tinfoil hat sites that prey on the easily fooled and convince them that they are the "critical thinkers" and everyone else are the unthinking sheep. Going into these sites is not doing research, lol.*
*There are many many pre-1966 pictures where he has a long face. As many as the round face. It's as if you are brand new to this planet. Different angles will give you different looks. Even with pictures of yourself. Faulers are missing that nuance gene. Though his mop top did a lot of the work rounding out his face too.*
*On Justice for James she actually passed off Paul's Stage IEM as a prosthetic ear and you all ate that up. Lol.*
*On Sage Of Quay he did an "investigation" into how it would be impossible for them to write and record and arrange Rubber Soul from October 12th to November 15th*
*But what he forgot to mention was that they came in dry into the October recordings only after their June recordings were already completed*
*He knew that you all only get your info from these moronic sites and so you wouldn't know that very well known fact. That's how I know he's a scammer.*
Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime.
*A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece.*
*And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible malleable fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin and that distinctive arched line under his brow and above his eyelids as 1963 Paul had. Stella and Mary too also have that distinctive line above their eyelids***
*And at 20 James looks exactly like 1963 Paul but with his mother's blonde hair. And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael.*
*James and Stella gets their strawberry blond reddish light features from Linda. Not from Vivian Stanshall.*
*How can James look like a disguise? Lol*
*As that is what Vivian and Faul are supposed to be. Faul with surgeries and daily latex every time he goes out (lol) and Vivian with strawberry blond reddish wigs and Hollywood prosthetics. Lol (as "William is supposed to most resemble his first character Phil Averill, bahahaha, even having to say "his first character" lowered my IQ by 50 points, lol).*
Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only song that his dad lied about and gives it to him in the 70's as a present).
His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding and pictures of them together.
Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back
*Paul buying that Scotland farm on June 17, 1966, etc*
*Tons of pictures him and his dad laughing together in the late 60s and 70s.*
*Google The Beatles Sweden Press conference. You'll see 1964 lefthanded Paul smoking mostly with his right hand. Also a video on Paul Is Not Dead channel of over 100 pictures of him using both hands before and after 66. Just a product of living in a right-handed world. Most prevalent in older generation lefthanders like myself and Paul.*
====
*He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs.*
*And a lot of the time you are comparing a baby fat faced Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat on his face in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward.*
*And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline simple. Every single photo that these tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day*
*These tinfoil hat sites prey on the easily fooled and convince them that they are the "critical thinkers" and everyone else are the unthinking sheep.*
Do you really think they and all his friends and family are that stupid to call him Billy whenever cameras are around? It's part their dry British humor. But mostly their nickname for him since back in the day when he would sign into hotels and recording sessions as Billy Martin.
You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962-1970.
If you reply TLDR I'll give you my bored yawn now.
@@agitatedmongoose Why the wig and fake mustache?
1966 Paul McCartney was the shit🔥🔥
I think 1967 Paul is his best era.
Regardless of who’s being interviewed, Paul/Faul spit some profound wisdom.
If Faul is the man Paul turned into after taking LSD then it makes a lot of sense
I know you won't see this but. Thank you William for all you've done for music
Sad to say, but he helped make my favorite beatle albums. Every single album after set pepper is pure gold
Bullshit
I know what you mean. When i first noticed the replacement i thought "well i prefer the albums with Billy". But saying that, i much prefer the Lennon / Harrison songs to Bill's.
Gullible dumbasses
Alix McCann Why do so many idiots believe the Paul is dead theory
Paul McCartney was an intelligent and charming man. This impostor is annoying
DAMN. Why you gotta disrespect Paul?
Amazing how Faul looked identical and has the exact same voice/accent as Paul and played guitar and bass left handed and wrote songs in exactly the same style as Paul. 🤡
Would you compare trash like Wild Honey Pie written by William (1937-) with Yesterday by James Paul McCartney (1942-1966)?
William is NOT a genius like people say. Hey Jude is just filled with Nah's that it makes it awful.
So why do my Beatles albums credit Lennon-McCartney? Wouldn't that other genius composer want the credit and $$? You people are just hilarious😂 I'm sure there will be a genius with a totally logical answer.
@@thegreatdonato478you took their worst song and compared it to their best, hilarious
@@Beepcassy Paul McCartney died and was replaced with William.
@@thegreatdonato478fool
He gives a very natural and articulate explanation of the Bill of Rights.
James Paul McCartney died in car crash on September 11 1966. Brian Epstein with the consent of the authorities at the time and the three Beatles, he decides to replace Paul with a right-handed session musician named William Shepherd. Everyone involved, including their families, vowed to keep everything a secret. However, The Beatles produced over a hundred clues about Paul's death in their albums and images. William underwent numerous cosmetic surgeries to resemble Paul. William is two inches taller than Paul, William has green eyes, William has a weaker and thinner voice than Paul, William has totally different manners. Musically, Paul was a genius, William is just a good musician.
Cool story, weirdo.
@@Niko3387Y Get a brain, weirdo.
@@Niko3387Y Get a brain, weirdo.
@@Niko3387Y This is the truth, weirdo.
@@justiceforjamespaulmccartney "the truth" 🤣🤣
Interesting he says "you know" constantly, in the Frost interview doesn't say that
The real Paul used that word in some Interview and Bill picked up on that.
He says it a lot in the 1966 Memphis interview
@@thomascars1 it still doesnt make it anything other than a bizarre impersonation of Paul McCartney. And the tone of the voice is different.
ua-cam.com/video/04IyjV66B8M/v-deo.html
This is the real Paul
@@olskzeri2723 hes been enlightened maaaaan probably got stoned out his mind and saw the unity in everything, that's what hes trying to explain in this interview, but he can't seem to get it across because it's too deep of a concept and he doesn't lack the intellectual jargon like Alan Watts could.
Paul looks so hot here!!!
PERFECT!!!
The Paul is dead theory is irrelevant. Any way you go, whether you believe he’s dead or not, he would still continue to make great music even today.
His nose grew so much within several months. A real Pinocchio.
Billy... he loves to lie. He's been fooling for 56 years or something.
And dig the Viv wig billy be sporting here@@nadiachristiansen7599
For all those guys who say that the drugs changed him, people, the drugs doesn't change you in 3 or 4 months.
count how many times he says: ' you know' ...it's staggering
I'm neutral just investigating and his replacement is very smart..Don't forget he is playing Paul...The story was Squashed and the Beatles on had 2 years in...1966 Paul crashed his car and was beheaded...That's why in 1969 they pumped out tons of their stuff from his old recording material added it too Lennons lines in the studio until 1969 John says in an interview on the latenight show (1971)it was no fun playing with The band anymore because the fans didn't hear their music because they were so loud..."Poor Excuse"Another poor excuse Lennon gave was they didn't sit down and write together like they used too..Him and Faul were bestfriends since High School and he despised the new Paul..He wasn't seen live with him since the Beatles...They did it to bring in Billions of dollars and even kept him alive, married to his illuminati handler ,making Billions more in sales over the Years...The 80's was a huge seller for them after Lennon was Assassinated by the CIA....
You're incredibly naive. But hey, if chasing your tail with this bullshit keeps you out of trouble, enjoy yourself.
God gave me Eyes to see things others can't...Why would he clearly be wearing a fakr mustache..So Fake it almost fell off and he had to fix it...Just that 1 fact makes this whole thing suspicious...
Andrew Thomas I live in Las Vegas, and here it's all about the odds. So what are the odds that after Paul supposedly died, they found a guy who looked like Paul, sounded like Paul, acted like Paul, (And here you have think this guy has to look, sound, and act enough like Paul to fool, at the very least, casual acquaintances.), was about the same age as Paul, is left handed, plays multiple instruments, and is a pretty damn good song writer? And having to do all of this within a week or two of when Paul supposedly died, seeing as we have photos of Paul from November of 1966 shortly after the 9th when he supposedly died.
We're talking trillions to one just to find a guy like that, let alone to be lucky enough to find him within a week of the supposed death. Sorry guy, Paul did not die; he's alive and well. Time to move on to some other conspiracy. Try the masons, that thing hasn't died in centuries.
You don't seem neutral to me, you effing tool.
Andrew Thomas - didn't you mean to write that the real Paul and John were friends since high school.
It's true people. It really is. But not only that...
George died in 1967 and was replaced by an Indian Swami; John died in 1968 and was replaced by a post-op transgender japanese schoolgirl; and Ringo died in 1969 and was replaced by a tapir. I read it all on the internet and it must be true.
Hilarious!!!
yknow yknow yknow yknow yknow some many yknow!!!!😱😱
In five months, Paul's voice sounds faster, much more mature than the last 1966 interview. Scores of other points are screaming this is not the real Paul.
MicheleGer ever heard of “aging”
Andy May who the fuck ages DRASTICALLY in 5 months?
@@ringosnose5304 THANK YOU FINALLY A SMART PERSON
@@Hester-l6k ANYONE you aren't Paul's friend you don't know he might've got sick
To be fair, if anyone in the beatles changed fast it would be John Lennon. Look at john's photo in early 66 and mid 66, the change is staggering.
I've read John and Paul were doing speedballs during this period.
Paul never did H wrong info
even if he never did die, which there is, without a doubt, really weird/convincing stuff to it, he changed so much, enough to make John really not like Paul too much.
john wanted to be an activist and paul wanted to be a pop singer, they both grew up a lot and changed a lot too
How they duped so many for so long is astonishing.
'Look-alike' yes, very good, but accepted as Paul for 50 years?
If you really still believe this then you must be delusional. His family and the Beatles are horrible monsters if any of this proven lie were true.
@@patcola7335 Exactly. People never think about Paul's family, friends, or every other Beatle member when thinking about the theory. How the fuck would The Beatles accept replacing Paul jusy like that? I'm just tired of this theory.
@@bautibonzini2835 his family was informed about the switch after Paul died....they all knew, and everyone in the industry knows, but its taboo to speak of openly
@@Mrgattes1 So? What about the other Beatles, I wouldn't believe any of them, especially George or John for example, to agree with this kind of shit. Fighting for truth and learning aboit spirituality but then lying and saying their friend is dead.
@@bautibonzini2835 of course they were told about it...they had no choice but to go along. That's why they stopped touring and band broke up 4 years later... Lennon was starting to slip up so they dealt with him. Listen to the song 'How do you sleep' by Lennon. The Beatles were not an organic band that made it big. They were a Tavistock project. Good books are out there the explain it all
C`mon guys. Get rid of this paranoia !
Paul's voice changed from 1967
my voiced changed too when i was getting older
@@Andrew-ve9ls Not from 24 to 25 years old
To all the people who think this is a fake Paul McCartney, I think I figured out why you think he died in 1966.
You just have to listen to what he’s saying, but instead you’re so busy comparing his mannerisms that you miss the whole point.
Paul got ENLIGHTENED by using LSD and by going do India (like George and John, i don’t know about Ringo). He’s talking about human shared counciousness and ideas of personal freedom and realisation, these are ideas at the core of spiritual teachings.
Having these realizations (and doing drugs) DRAMATICALLY CHANGE a person. It’s also called an ego-death. The whole person you thought you were disappears, and the real you emerges.
The drugs, cigarettes and alcohol deteriorated his voice like almost any other rock singer. Even your face changes over time.’
He became mature and aware, you’re all just missing a kid who in some sense actually died, he’s a man now.
Paul McCartney died in 1966. End of story.
i dont think any of them were enlightened especially john that veg
@@thegreatdonato478crétin !
@@FishIde418 It's a bit too controlled, Y'know!
Lsd doesnt change your face structure as far as i know, not even hard drugs do that.
I can't believe they duped us for so long.. This clearly is not the guy (Paul) on David Frost a few months before
Actually the interview with David Frost was 2 years before. But you're right this is quite different.
if you have any experience with pot, it's obvious to see that paul is just baked as hell in this video. the way he's rambling, and the kind of vacant look in his eyes and the squinty eyebrows. they're all common signs that before he came into the studio he was probably puffing on the biggest reefer that side of amsterdam
Who cares, Billy has done a fine job since takin over. Thanks William
He said “y’know” about 44 times :)
So you're telling me they (whoever they are) found a guy that looked EXACTLY like paul, sounded like him had the same mannerisms and talent who threw his old life away, and whos kids look exactly like paul..and did all of that within a few months? where is "billys" family at anyways?
This is Faul giving his manifesto.
This one’s full on confident and doesn’t stop for a breath the original Paul was thoughtful about his words this one talks without a breath ya ya ya ya ya
If you look at the Paul from the movie "help" and then after 1967 singing "im a loser" with John, you can tell it is a different man. He is thinner and taller, and very weird looking. John is really cold and distant and shifts his eyes to him singing "I am not what I appear tp be".
So you think Lennon suspected?
Lennon knew all along@@jeffryphillipsburns
@@jeffryphillipsburns Haha!
Paul McCartney was so mature even at the young age of 25. His band mates too.
ITS FAUL ALLRIGHT, he sounds like a cop doesn't he, OLD FLATTOP, HE COMES GROOVIN UP SLOWLY, HE GOT JOOJO EYEBALLS..............he's wearing contacts,
After this interview and the infamous LSD one you would never see Faul being interviewed alone as a Beatle. Rambling and not used to the spotlight.
That’s not true look up the 1968 Paul McCartney interview. That is done alone.
@@dachille1 These PID people can't be bothered with facts, you're wasting your time.
A brave effort by Paul, lol. He must have been terrified of being found out.
Huh
He is the biggest imposter in the world.😎
Paul's face was heart shaped. Here you see a long face. Listen to Paul's voice prior to 1966. I understand that your voice changes but within 2 years. No! And what about his green eyes? Paul had brown eyes.
I was surprised too. You're right in my opinion. The nose changed, the ears changed ( & part looks like it fell off in one interview. ( in the wings era) eye colour too. & it's not just him , there are heaps of examples of this stuff with others.
All the Beatles look different after 1966 you gullible losers
@Truth & Light compare George in 64 to him in 67. He obvious changed a lot but no one mentions that. I personally think Paul's not dead. After all, why would they put obvious clues in their music? It's just a dumb hoax
Sweet n' Sour Sauce do u think there is any truth to the John Halliday rumors? I believe John Halliday looks more like the real Paul than this Arabic lookin guy here!
One things for sure this guy is rather serious, and doesnt smile much. Paul really lost his sense of humour?.. And I know maybe Faul liked Grandad suites with ties. I mean he's literally wearing the shittest suite in the world, with a hawaiian tie. Did Paul ever dress this shit before??.. He seems to me somewhat incoherant, and definitely not content or relaxed.
STILL, YOU KNOW, IT'S A FANTASTIC
STORY! THIS MAN---BILLY---GAVE UP
HIS IDENTITY, HIS LIFE, WENT THROUGH PLASTIC SURGERIES, ETC
TO GIVE THE WORLD THE BEATLES,
AND A LOT OF GREAT MUSIC!
YES, HE FOOLED US! BUT, STILL, IT'S
A FANTASTIC STORY!
@@GuitarJoe316 "IT WAS A FAKE MUSTACHE"
that is paul in the video, there is no billy shears. it doesn't take a genius to see that the reason mccartney is acting off in this video is that he's high as a kite, and i know that because he sounds exactly like me after i've had a few joints.
Looks like he's wearing a wig.
Faul's chin is shorter than Paul's was. His ears are different. He's 2 inches taller. He grew 2 inches from 66 to 67? Faul is no where near as handsome as Paul was. Faul's hair is lighter and thinner. Paul had black hair and it was the thickest hair I have ever seen. Faul's eyes are light. Paul's eyes were very dark. I think Faul is Paul's twin. Paul is dead. Pics of his body are on the internet.
Yes they were identical twins. Look at pictures of Paul as a little boy. There’s a picture of his twin who is supposed to be younger than Paul but in the picture they’re exactly the same age. And they’re identical. As adults they didn’t look alike at all. I don’t believe that Mike guy is Paul/Fouls brother at all. Just a relative perhaps playing a part.
Billy Shears
William Shepard
Billy Shepard
Billy Pepper
Sargent Pepper
exactly
Cosmic Seer William Campbell
Faul was so high here
True! And Paul would never ramble and talk so much like fake paul did here.
is that a wig? his hair looks bizarre, even for a Beatle. I'm not saying I do or don't believe Paul is dead... but that hair is funny.
Anne Mott -- Faul's hair grows in the opposite direction that Paul's did. Paul's hair naturally parted on his the left and flowed over toward the right of his head.
Anne Mott nah it’s just being shampooed, hair dryed and hairsprayed. Big thing back then.
Looks like Paul McCartney to me.
@@mrog5481 The word in here is "looks". This is not Paul McCartney. Just a Fool blabbing on and on.
@@bethlast4269 Read the lyrics to "Wont get fooled again". The band "The Who" was part of the inner Circle and They knew about Pauls death.
Haha Paul is probably on a good acid trip, and it's easy to converse LSD is the bomb! you go paul. 27 and living life!
You Know, you know, you know, you know...
that is obviously a wig. I mean it clearly is. Plain as day
I was thinking that too. Looks like he got a bouffont around 1967. What are the theories on this?
You’re close. Faul(Bill Shepherd) actually dies his hair because it’s actually blonde. He also doesn’t have the hair loss gene as where Paul was losing his hair and wrapped it around where it looked like a toupee. Also their hair grows different from each other. The Who sang it “Parted to the left now parted to the right.”
@@MetalPete_the_metalfan cmon do you really believe this shit, that paul is dead and that this is a replacement
@@pimprijs2120 no
Yes it looks like a syrup
Viendo esos viejos videos, George y los otros tenían razón, es incomprensible tanta locura. George, la tercera voz importante de Los Beatles, sabía calar hondo en sus compañeros cuando hablaba. Casualmente fue el primero en querer irse de la banda. John lo ha dicho. Se cansaron de ser graciosos muñequitos para adorno que cantaban hermosas canciones de amor; se hartaron de ser utilizados para distintos eventos como si fueran sanadores que curaban males con su sola presencia. No eran ellos mismos como lo ha expresado Lennon. Ellos sólo eran músicos, sabes, artistas. Pretendían hacer arte con la música y eran vanguardistas desde la primera época. En los primeros años de Hamburgo, se habían juntado con un grupo de artistas de vanguardia quienes les diseñaron sus peinados, muy locos para la época y con el cual sorprendieron a todos. Ese fue su gran secreto, también fueron una banda pop muy fashion con reminiscencias vanguardistas. A mediados de los 60 sentían que se caían artísticamente y el concierto de Candlestick Park marcó el final de la locura. Es un concierto horrible y allí dijeron basta.
Oh no guys, Paul just died, lets find someone that looks, sounds, and plays like him. You guys are idiots if you believe this. If you say the Abbey road picture with his shoes off is not because he was wearing sandals, look up pictures from the photo shoot , you will find some with his sandals on. How do you find someone that plays bass as good as him? I am a bassist and I can confirm, that can not be replicated. This is just stupid.
BeatleTales
lol, exactly.
THERE IS A LOT OF DIFFERENCE IN THE FACE THIS ONE WHICH LATER WAS CALLED FAUL. THE FACE IS SKINNER, SHAKEN. THE ORIGINAL HAD A ROUNDER FACE. IT IS LOGICAL THAT IT IS NOT THE SAME PERSON.
this actually looks like normal paul with a wig. weird.
Ringo and Mick Jagger knew Paul and could tell us about Paul's funeral . It's so big that they can't tell the truth .
i'm on ritalin and this is cracking me the fuck up
@@lennypane62 Smoke one on top of yer meds You will soon believe
is that billy shepherd wearing a Paul McCartney mask
wig and fake stache
If you met him you would make some excuse to get away from this guy.
It looks like he's using his right hand in his body language a lot more than his left. When he's referring to himself, he puts his right hand close to his chest.
Paul is right handed, he just plays bass left handed.
He talks more like John's accent Paul had a little more of an American sounding accent... Just me idk
Paul , the real Paul, wouldn't ramble on and on like this one.
Highly intelligent guy. It was clear when he was -- what, 24? 25? -- and his success since then has confirmed it. Paul McCartney is a living legend, and deservedly. When he leaves this planet, he'll be missed for (I believe) centuries. That being said, I still love Beatles music, though only select songs, and yet haven't liked anything Paul has made since then. Matter of taste, of course. Regardless, he is a giant.
He's not PJM and it's obvious.
*****
I 'fess to gullibility. Dammit. Well, there is always hope that before I die, I will shuck it. And be....ungullible?
Casey Nova Not what he was saying at all. He said to have an open mind and always be looking for truth. Not sure what could possible be controversial about that.
A word salad, nothing of substance. Trying to sound erudite and failing...
This is the real Paul
@@garryleeks8655 no it’s not
this is the fake paul... watch the movement of his eyebrow, and compare this interview to the interview of Paul with David Frost in 1964. The Paul in 1964 hardly moved his eyebrow, very less expressive compared to this one. Even when in excitement, the eyebrows tell it all. Notice also the difference in the jaw line and the voice. Remember, in 1964 Paul was fully grown man at early/mid twenties. As such, the voice pitch/tone/vibration shouldn't change that much... Definitely, Paul has died and was replaced by this guy Faul...
+Its Me If you are actually being serious, you know that Paul was arrested several times for possession of marijuana, the whole "Faul" thing would come out to light then, clearly Paul is Paul , there's no "doubles"....
Oh, come now, all you conspiracy boys and girls. Two left-handed geniuses who can compose, then play, some of the world's most astonishing music??? In the 60s we were just beginning to understand audio. Recording studios were constantly upgrading with the latest technology. TV/radio stations were, however, all over the map as far as technology. There was no consistency as there is today with inexpensive digital audio. Paul (or John, George and Ringo) could go from station to station for interviews and easily sound like completely different people. You had to be there. Give it a rest, folks.
They never toured after august 66 .Shears plays right handed in studio .
Cromwell Bear, Arthurs line. Idiot
Quincy Jones disagrees on that talented part
@@CPI99 Quincy's entitled to his opinion. Doesn't make him right.
Wow, looks just like him, sounds just like him, plays bass just like him, writes songs just like him, writes lyrics just like him, sings just like him and acts just likes him. How gullible do you have to be to jump on the conspiracy bandwagon?
You are still asleep my friend. But it is not your fault the programming is strong.
@@crazycat1345 who even cares if this weak conspiracy is true? Sounds like you might be the one “asleep”, wasting your time on this shit. The Beatles are legendary regardless. Go invest your time into a conspiracy theory with more weight, at the very least. But really, ultimately, you need to go outside, take off your flip flops, and touch some sweet,sweet grass.
@@crazycat1345 Wow you must be an expert about "programming".
Profound fucking interview that is still relevant today and a bunch of people are joking about it. Regardless of drugs, what he is saying is exactly where we are at today!
bungalow billy, not, paul mccartney
He is Lucy in the sky with diamonds
No he’s Rocky Racoon
"I Will"
@@frankfacts6207 exactly 👍🏼