Thanks again for the great lecture! I’ve actually have experienced a product failure last year which was due to absence of interfaces management and failure mode effectiveness analysis. 4 canonical categories of interface : Physical connection, energy flow, mass flow, information flow
I like to listen to knowledge outside of my field, to get the deeper underlying pattern many fields use to structure things and concepts. Thank you for sharing this content with the world.
Thanks again for the great lecture! I’ve actually have experienced a product failure last year which was due to absence of interfaces management and failure mode effectiveness analysis.
4 canonical categories of interface : Physical connection, energy flow, mass flow, information flow
I like to listen to knowledge outside of my field, to get the deeper underlying pattern many fields use to structure things and concepts. Thank you for sharing this content with the world.
Interfaces are the most neglected and most interesting aspects of System Engineering.
I assume it's because so many engineers still are all part-oriented instead of system-oriented.
@@BunKerFunK3r Subject-matter Experts know all about "their box".
That's why System Engineers have to think outside of the box!
@@douglasstrother6584 can’t agree more
Read about "Integration Readiness Levels" which are metrics comparable to TRLs regarding the maturity of integration.
Thank you for the video, I hope this will be helpful towards my upcoming interview for my SI internship
Good stuff nicer than music I love it
Thank you MIT❤️❤️❤️❤️
5:00
so, a human to motion detector interface would fall under physical interface?
On a high level Yes... but you would have to define on a low level what part of the motion detector is getting triggered by the human
damn shame he had to present this lecture remotely from EPFL. Audio quality is bad and its more difficult to understand when the slide advance