If we Consider absolute stillness of mind as the meaning of life that we seek And The non absolutely stillness is the virtue that makes all of us conscious Then it is a paradox , either the meaning loose its stillness or we loose our consciousness to get that meaning
"Your perspective is quite thought-provoking, especially the paradox between absolute stillness and consciousness. Perhaps the journey toward finding the meaning of life lies in balancing both, without completely sacrificing one for the other. What do you think?"
@@Wisdom-naThanks for the appreciation, But I think balancing the meaning of life with our consciousness seems to be temporary because of the unsettling or eternally changing nature of our consciousness the meaning that we use at a time to balance our consciousness will not balance it in some other time so we might use some other meaning for that time and so on till our death. I think we all are balancing our consciousness already in our daily life with stuff like hope ,love ,pleasure and all. But a static solution can't be an answer for a dynamic problem these are my thoughts
Its interesting that it seems to me like he summarises humanity into a view that excludes much of humanity But again, im saying this without knowing much about him
That’s an interesting observation. It does seem like such a perspective might oversimplify humanity, leaving out many complexities and nuances. But, as you said, it’s hard to judge fully without understanding more about his intentions or context. What aspects of humanity do you think are missing from this view?
❤
If we Consider absolute stillness of mind as the meaning of life that we seek
And
The non absolutely stillness is the virtue that makes all of us conscious
Then it is a paradox , either the meaning loose its stillness or we loose our consciousness to get that meaning
"Your perspective is quite thought-provoking, especially the paradox between absolute stillness and consciousness. Perhaps the journey toward finding the meaning of life lies in balancing both, without completely sacrificing one for the other. What do you think?"
@@Wisdom-naThanks for the appreciation, But I think balancing the meaning of life with our consciousness seems to be temporary because of the unsettling or eternally changing nature of our consciousness the meaning that we use at a time to balance our consciousness will not balance it in some other time so we might use some other meaning for that time and so on till our death.
I think we all are balancing our consciousness already in our daily life with stuff like hope ,love ,pleasure and all.
But a static solution can't be an answer for a dynamic problem
these are my thoughts
Its interesting that it seems to me like he summarises humanity into a view that excludes much of humanity
But again, im saying this without knowing much about him
That’s an interesting observation. It does seem like such a perspective might oversimplify humanity, leaving out many complexities and nuances. But, as you said, it’s hard to judge fully without understanding more about his intentions or context. What aspects of humanity do you think are missing from this view?