Fortune-Telling with Python: An Intro to Facebook Prophet

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 вер 2017
  • A pythonic tour of Facebook's time series package. Intermediate level with basic statistics and time data familiarity required.
    Jonathan Balaban is a senior data scientist, strategy consultant, and entrepreneur with ten years of private, public, and philanthropic experience. He currently teaches business professionals and leaders the art of impact-focused, practical data science at Metis.
    Founded in 2003, Chicago Python User Group is one of the world's most active programming language special interest groups with over 1,000 active members and many more prestigious alumni. Our main focus is the Python Programming Language.
    ~~ Connect with us! ~~
    chipymentor.org
    @ChicagoPython
    chipy.slack.com
    chipy.org
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 32

  • @ronaktali
    @ronaktali 6 років тому +1

    fantastic package..

  • @charlielu05
    @charlielu05 6 років тому +1

    Awesome talk! Thanks for sharing this!

  • @ozziejin
    @ozziejin 4 роки тому +1

    great presentation!

  • @bhuvaneshmewar938
    @bhuvaneshmewar938 6 років тому +1

    Good explanation on the workings

  • @aok1425
    @aok1425 6 років тому +1

    that was really good; thanks!

  • @aryansehgal939
    @aryansehgal939 4 роки тому +1

    Cool way to explain the model. Nice one...

  • @tombrady7390
    @tombrady7390 3 роки тому

    his talk is clean like his dataset

  • @nitricpumps
    @nitricpumps 6 років тому

    Thanks

  • @weepingclown6402
    @weepingclown6402 Рік тому

    Just watched this, what a beautiful presentation! I wish everything I do some research on explained things as simply as this xD

  • @taiyuanxiaoze
    @taiyuanxiaoze 5 років тому

    I just used fbprophet model right now. To me, there are some limited parts: 1)Time problem:in daily case, one new data comes and use model to fit or predict again with almost same data except new one. 2) model: linear or logistic is not automatic decided, still analysis by human being, in the case we have a bunch of time series. 3) multiple seasonality: additive or keep some leave some out. It is decided by human being too.

  • @kemerogh
    @kemerogh 6 років тому +1

    would you consider releasing the example code you demo here?

  • @lakshmiprasath8675
    @lakshmiprasath8675 5 років тому

    possible to do high granular level - weekly/monthly etc?

  • @dastanaitzhanov2544
    @dastanaitzhanov2544 5 років тому +2

    Thanks for posting this, Jonathan! Do you have the link to the JP notebook?

    • @razmiknawa
      @razmiknawa 3 роки тому +2

      You can find a recreated one here: colab.research.google.com/drive/114Hj-4ui4weXGbUerhuqau-au91JOaS-?usp=sharing

  • @VLM234
    @VLM234 4 роки тому +2

    A great video, thank you so much.
    In the first ex. you have taken log of y so for actual predicted value doesn't need to take antilog ??

    • @jalbarracin
      @jalbarracin 3 роки тому +1

      YES. Predicted value should be corrected with numpy.exp(y_hat) to get the "human understandable" number :)

    • @VLM234
      @VLM234 3 роки тому +1

      @@jalbarracin thank you for your answer.... Actually I am doing the same conversion but didn't find it in the video so asked....

  • @ramp2011
    @ramp2011 6 років тому +19

    Can u share the link to the juputer notebook you used? Thx

    • @sparshgupta2931
      @sparshgupta2931 4 роки тому +2

      It is present on facebook's official github page for prophet package's documentation.

    • @danielcs88
      @danielcs88 4 роки тому +5

      github.com/ultimatist/ODSC17

  • @sunke552
    @sunke552 3 роки тому

    can this model take exogenous variables?

  • @EranM
    @EranM 6 років тому +4

    Where is the testing data comparing to the prediction data? wheres the error curve? evaluation metric?

  • @TheAnubhav27
    @TheAnubhav27 4 роки тому +5

    Only works on academic data. On real industrial dataset, it fails miserably. In case of clear seasonality, it works somewhat better

    • @hadialkhamees2744
      @hadialkhamees2744 3 роки тому

      Why so? Do you have any examples?

    • @TheAnubhav27
      @TheAnubhav27 3 роки тому +1

      @@hadialkhamees2744 I tried it on some industrial datasets but didn't work. Sometimes the error is even higher than the actual values resulting in negative accuracies.

    • @KumarHemjeet
      @KumarHemjeet 2 роки тому +1

      which package works better on Industrial data ?

  • @ritvikdhupkar5861
    @ritvikdhupkar5861 4 роки тому +1

    The link is given here-
    facebook.github.io/prophet/docs/quick_start.html

  • @jesusthesecond6847
    @jesusthesecond6847 3 роки тому

    Now Combine this with Mundane Astrology , You get a More Accurate Prophecy .