This was a good and respectfully done video. I think there needs to be more curiosity about why things may not work all the time. It’s not like attempting to punch people has the same effect on everyone (due to differences in body mass, defense skills, evasion skills, etc). I think the last few minutes, where hypnosis is discussed and what is possible under newtonian physics or quantum mechanics are some areas to explore in greater detail. The thing about hypnosis is that “susceptible” means “willing”. For hypnosis to work you have to want it to work. Also, hypnosis doesnt work instantly or every time. Your own stresses and amount of exposure affect the likelihood you will experience something again. It is entirely possible under hypnosis to create triggered muscular reactions. Triggers can come from almost anywhere. I have experienced a spontaneous triggered mental and muscular reaction in response to seeing an emoji. But at the same time, having experienced “qi” emission and having experienced hypnosis, i can say it absolutely wasnt hypnosis in my case , because the room was silent the first time i experienced it, and there was no warning or prior demonstration or training about what was going to happen… and everyone in the room experienced it. I think the statement that qi isnt possible or explainable with newtonian physics or quantum mechanics is actually a lazy and unsupportable assertion. Just because you may not have the explanation doesnt mean an explanation is impossible. It may be accurate to say that nobody thus far that you are aware of has explained it using those frameworks, but that statement is of course limited to your own personal perspective. I think it’s important to maintain the humility that your own perspective isnt automatically correct. There may be explanations that you simply havent entertained or been exposed to. It is well documented that living things emit energy (heat, light, sound, electricity, and other forms of energy). It is entirely possible that measuring qi is simply difficult, in the same way that understanding whale communication is inherently a difficult task.
Thanks for writing such a long and thoughful reply. Could I ask about which teacher you experienced the chi emission? Would you be interested in discussing this experience further? I don't think either of us suggested that Newtonian physics disproves chi. I think we were arguing that 'no touch' fajin could not be explained by physics.
@@walkonthewooside i have some experience with the no touch/empty force stuff. Its a "real" phenomenon, just rather useless for martial arts in my opinion. can also explain the basic mechanics of "fajin/jin" without the woo or chinese terms, and which conditions it works or doesnt. ua-cam.com/video/STEoIKnlrp0/v-deo.htmlsi=UelPHfOwcba-mU9M
Nice one. Keep'em coming
Great episode. Nice to hear a Chinese speaker who is also a Chinese martial artist talking about the language
‘Hypnosis’ is just applied psychology (in a folk sense rather than academic sense)
This was a good and respectfully done video. I think there needs to be more curiosity about why things may not work all the time. It’s not like attempting to punch people has the same effect on everyone (due to differences in body mass, defense skills, evasion skills, etc).
I think the last few minutes, where hypnosis is discussed and what is possible under newtonian physics or quantum mechanics are some areas to explore in greater detail.
The thing about hypnosis is that “susceptible” means “willing”. For hypnosis to work you have to want it to work. Also, hypnosis doesnt work instantly or every time. Your own stresses and amount of exposure affect the likelihood you will experience something again. It is entirely possible under hypnosis to create triggered muscular reactions. Triggers can come from almost anywhere. I have experienced a spontaneous triggered mental and muscular reaction in response to seeing an emoji.
But at the same time, having experienced “qi” emission and having experienced hypnosis, i can say it absolutely wasnt hypnosis in my case , because the room was silent the first time i experienced it, and there was no warning or prior demonstration or training about what was going to happen… and everyone in the room experienced it.
I think the statement that qi isnt possible or explainable with newtonian physics or quantum mechanics is actually a lazy and unsupportable assertion. Just because you may not have the explanation doesnt mean an explanation is impossible. It may be accurate to say that nobody thus far that you are aware of has explained it using those frameworks, but that statement is of course limited to your own personal perspective. I think it’s important to maintain the humility that your own perspective isnt automatically correct. There may be explanations that you simply havent entertained or been exposed to.
It is well documented that living things emit energy (heat, light, sound, electricity, and other forms of energy). It is entirely possible that measuring qi is simply difficult, in the same way that understanding whale communication is inherently a difficult task.
Thanks for writing such a long and thoughful reply. Could I ask about which teacher you experienced the chi emission? Would you be interested in discussing this experience further?
I don't think either of us suggested that Newtonian physics disproves chi. I think we were arguing that 'no touch' fajin could not be explained by physics.
@@walkonthewooside i have some experience with the no touch/empty force stuff. Its a "real" phenomenon, just rather useless for martial arts in my opinion.
can also explain the basic mechanics of "fajin/jin" without the woo or chinese terms, and which conditions it works or doesnt. ua-cam.com/video/STEoIKnlrp0/v-deo.htmlsi=UelPHfOwcba-mU9M