@Bellerophon2200 Apple is in a unique position in the computer industry. They can dictate the hardware requirements for their systems needs because they make the OS and the machines themselves, so they won't be putting out stuff that needs more power than they can deliver with their machines, and most developers of the Mac platform also work this way. Lots of Windows devs have the assumption "people will just upgrade, who cares about optimised code", because in that world it's sad but true.
@DeedMDavid The "core" series of CPU's were a HUGE improvement over the Pentium line because they moved to a radically changed architecture. The Nehalem stuff we have now is the kind of performance boost seen going from Pentium to Core, from Core to Nehalem. Intel only really "beat" PPC because IBM focused their development on the server/supercomputer market. The G5 was never really made to be a consumer chip, it needed way more cooling/power than it could get in anything but a PowerMac/XServe.
lol "...and the competitors haven't even caught up to our first generation." It's a shame that they can't say that now, considering how the iMac is just RECENTLY got an i7 while I've been using my 920 (sometimes overclocked) for about a year now. ___________________________ posted from my Asus CG 5290 i7 2.63 Ghz GTX260 1TB HDD 32" LCD
>aol - excellent are you fucking kidding me? And i cant help but wonder if towards the end, it was comparing its processors to the low end ones ie. Much like comparing a 17in macbook processor with an intel atom.
@TalesOfWar That is true and I understand that they want to make a high quality machine by matching the hardware and the software well. I just think that his argument is invalid, because Apple is obviously not on the cutting edge in terms of its PCs. I personally have a 3rd Gen 32 GB iPod touch and I love it, but when it comes to PCs, Apple is most certainly not on the cutting edge.
@TalesOfWar Exactly. Apple can't adapt and be flexible. When the next generation of processors comes out, Apple will still lag behind because it can't adapt.
> implying smaller laptop = better >nice fans on the back - laughtrack oh its bad to cool the processor, thats why the new macbooks with i7s overheat =), cuz thats just better >6 buttons >implying less options and customizability = better. new gaming controllers have more buttons than old, i guess that means old games are better. >way ahead of other competitors > no quadcore configs on macbook.
This guy has no idea what the fuck he's talking about rofl. Macs are JUST NOW getting quadcore processors, and even those still suck pretty hard. The rest of what I'd like to say is kinda already posted by @MoonKittinJD. I wonder what this guy has to say about my Terabyte HDD, 6 Gigs of RAM, Sapphire Radeon 5850, and quadcore processor running at 3 Ghzs each.
![Steve Jobs in Sweden, 1985 [HQ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2qLuerYx2IA/mqdefault.jpg)
@Bellerophon2200 Apple is in a unique position in the computer industry. They can dictate the hardware requirements for their systems needs because they make the OS and the machines themselves, so they won't be putting out stuff that needs more power than they can deliver with their machines, and most developers of the Mac platform also work this way. Lots of Windows devs have the assumption "people will just upgrade, who cares about optimised code", because in that world it's sad but true.
This video is really making me laugh!
He hardly gets jealous of others he is best💯
He was soo jelo
was this recorded on a windows pc?
"I don't think it can be more black and white." HAHAHAHA
1:29 - HAHAHA I had a computer exactly like that. Pretty good for gaming for those days
@DeedMDavid The "core" series of CPU's were a HUGE improvement over the Pentium line because they moved to a radically changed architecture. The Nehalem stuff we have now is the kind of performance boost seen going from Pentium to Core, from Core to Nehalem. Intel only really "beat" PPC because IBM focused their development on the server/supercomputer market. The G5 was never really made to be a consumer chip, it needed way more cooling/power than it could get in anything but a PowerMac/XServe.
...Screamers.. Okay.
lol "...and the competitors haven't even caught up to our first generation."
It's a shame that they can't say that now, considering how the iMac is just RECENTLY got an i7 while I've been using my 920 (sometimes overclocked) for about a year now.
___________________________
posted from my Asus CG 5290 i7 2.63 Ghz GTX260 1TB HDD 32" LCD
>aol - excellent
are you fucking kidding me?
And i cant help but wonder if towards the end, it was comparing its processors to the low end ones ie. Much like comparing a 17in macbook processor with an intel atom.
SUPERB. -
@TalesOfWar That is true and I understand that they want to make a high quality machine by matching the hardware and the software well. I just think that his argument is invalid, because Apple is obviously not on the cutting edge in terms of its PCs. I personally have a 3rd Gen 32 GB iPod touch and I love it, but when it comes to PCs, Apple is most certainly not on the cutting edge.
can you list the keynotes you used?
I'll make Steve Jobs a screamer.
@TalesOfWar Exactly. Apple can't adapt and be flexible. When the next generation of processors comes out, Apple will still lag behind because it can't adapt.
Bellerophon2200 Apple can make its own processors and surely will not lag behind for its market (i.e. employees, artists, musicians, etc.)
> implying smaller laptop = better
>nice fans on the back - laughtrack
oh its bad to cool the processor, thats why the new macbooks with i7s overheat =), cuz thats just better
>6 buttons
>implying less options and customizability = better.
new gaming controllers have more buttons than old, i guess that means old games are better.
>way ahead of other competitors > no quadcore configs on macbook.
..Personal Preference people; just pick want you want. Like Apple? Get a damn iPhone. Like Samsung? Get a Samsung phone, and just ssh.
The fun part is their hardware is still shit.
3:20 Steve Jobs dies 10/5/2011,
9/20/2013 Apple actually ships plastic junk iPhones to customers...
Вот это прикол!
This guy has no idea what the fuck he's talking about rofl.
Macs are JUST NOW getting quadcore processors, and even those still suck pretty hard. The rest of what I'd like to say is kinda already posted by @MoonKittinJD.
I wonder what this guy has to say about my Terabyte HDD, 6 Gigs of RAM, Sapphire Radeon 5850, and quadcore processor running at 3 Ghzs each.
If you're going to attempt a controversial and disparaging post, at least learn how to use basic English grammar first.
@TurnYourBrainOn2 i came from /g/ and steve jobs is still a scam artist